Skip to main content

Full text of "The Coleopterists' bulletin"

See other formats


cr> 


OF  THE 

U  N  I  VERS  ITY 
Of  ILLINOIS 


595.705 

C0L.B 

v. 


BIOLOGY 


The  person  charging  this  material  is  re¬ 
sponsible  for  its  return  to  the  library  from 
which  it  was  withdrawn  on  or  before  the 
Latest  Date  stamped  below. 


Theft,  mutilation,  and  underlining  of  books 
are  reasons  for  disciplinary  action  and  may 
result  in  dismissal  from  the  University. 


UNIVERSITY  OF  ILLINOIS  LIBRARY  AT  URBANA-CHAMPAIGN 


L161  — 0-1096 


The  Coleopterists’  Bulletin 


A  QUARTERLY  PUBLICATION  DEVOTED  TO  THE  STUDY  OF  BEETLES 


VOLUME  18,  1964 


Published  by 


THE  CATHOLIC  UNIVERSITY  OF  AMERICA  PRESS 
WASHINGTON,  D.  C.  20017 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS*  BULLETIN 

Founded  1947  by  Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr. 

The  Coleopterists’  Bulletin  is  published  by  The  Catholic  University  of  America 
Press,  Washington,  D.  C.  20017  and  edited  by  T.  J.  Spilman.  It  is  issued  four  times  a 
year  beginning  with  March.  All  business  matters  should  be  addressed  to  The  Cole¬ 
opterists’  Bulletin  at  the  Press.  Manuscripts  and  other  editorial  matter  should  be 
addressed  to  the  editor,  U.  S.  National  Museum,  Washington,  D.  C.  20560. 


Subscriptions:  The  subscription  price  for 
each  annual  volume  of  four  numbers  is 
$5.00  payable  in  advance.  All  sub¬ 
scriptions  begin  with  the  first  issue  of 
the  year  and  those  subscribing  later  in 
the  year  will  receive  the  back  issues  of 
the  volume. 


Back  volumes:  A  stock  of  back  volumes 
is  maintained  and  may  be  purchased  as 
follows:  3  to  date,  $5.00  ea.;  single  num¬ 
bers,  $1.25  each;  all  prices  postpaid. 
Missing  numbers:  Issues  lost  in  the  mail 
will  be  supplied  free  of  charge  if  notified 
within  three  months  after  mailing. 


EDITORIAL  BOARD 


Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr.,  Ph.D. 

Department  of  Biology 
Catholic  University  of  America 

O.  L.  Cartwright 

U.  S.  National  Museum 
Washington,  D.  C.  20560 

Eugene  J.  Gerberg,  Ph.D. 

Insect  Control  and  Research,  Inc. 
Baltimore,  Md. 


James  A.  Magner,  Ph.D.,  S.T.D. 

Business  Manager  of  the  Bulletin 
Catholic  University  of  America 

Theodore  J.  Spilman 

U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture 
Washington,  D.  C.  20560 

Eileen  R.  Van  Tassell 

Department  of  Biology 
Catholic  University  of  America 


NOTICE  TO  AUTHORS 


Manuscripts  will  be  considered  ONLY 
FROM  SUBSCRIBERS.  Authors  should 
consult  STYLE  MANUAL  FOR  BIO¬ 
LOGICAL  JOURNALS,  prepared  by  the 
Committee  on  Form  and  Style  of  the  Con¬ 
ference  of  Biological  Editors,  and  pub¬ 
lished  by  the  American  Institute  of  Bio¬ 
logical  Sciences,  2000  P  St.,  N.W.,  Wash¬ 
ington,  D.  C.  20006.  The  Bulletin  requires 
that  all  manuscripts  be  prepared  according 
to  instructions  in  the  Style  Manual.  Illus¬ 
trations  should  be  sent  mounted,  and 
numbered.  The  manuscript  should  be 
marked  to  indicate  the  location  of  text 
figures  or  the  position  of  full  page  plates. 

Manuscripts  will  be  acknowledged  upon 
receipt.  As  soon  as  possible  thereafter  the 
author  will  be  notified  as  to  acceptance 
after  review  by  the  Editorial  Board.  If 
the  manuscript  is  accepted,  a  tentative 
date  of  publication  will  be  set.  In  general, 


all  papers  will  be  published  in  their  order 
of  receipt,  but  the  editor  reserves  the  right 
to  use  articles  out  of  order  in  the  interest 
of  a  balanced  magazine. 

The  editor  will  make  no  text  changes 
without  advanced  notice  to  the  author. 
Galley  proof  will  be  sent  for  correction. 
These  galleys  are  sent  out  well  in  advance 
and  do  NOT  indicate  the  date  or  order  of 
publication. 

Twenty-five  tear  sheets  of  one  page 
notes  will  be  supplied  free  to  the  author  if 
requested  when  returning  galley  proofs. 
Reprints  of  articles  printed  free  of  extrane¬ 
ous  matter  will  be  supplied  with  or  with¬ 
out  covers  at  cost.  Reprints  MUST  be 
ordered  on  the  form  provided  when  re¬ 
turning  galley  proofs.  The  approximate 
cost  of  reprints  will  be  supplied  with  this 
form. 


EDITORIAL  POLICY 

Any  article,  note,  or  news  items  likely  cases,  descriptions  of  new  species  must  be 
to  be  of  interest  to  readers  of  the  Bulletin  illustrated.  Descriptions  of  new  species  or 
will  be  considered.  Articles  with  illustra-  genera  MUST  contain  keys  or  be  corre- 
tions  are  particularly  desired,  and  in  all  lated  with  existing  keys. 


BIOLOGY 


TABLE  OF  CONTENTS 

Volume  18,  1964 


Anderson,  D.  M.,  A  review  of  the  specific  names  in  North  American  Miarus  (Cole- 
optera:  Curculionidae) . 

Arnett,  R.  H.,  Jr.,  Some  nomenclatural  changes  in  Oedemeridae  (Coleoptera).... 

- Notes  on  Karumiidae  (Coleoptera) . 

- B-p-hydroxyphenylethylamine-hydrochloride  on  Trox  sp.  (Cole¬ 
optera:  Scarabaeidae) . 

Barr,  T.  C.,  Jr.,  Non-troglobitic  Carabidae  (Coleoptera)  from  caves  in  the  United 
States . 

Bell,  R.  T.,  Does  Gehringici  belong  to  the  Isochaeta?  (Coleoptera:  Carabidae) . 

Burke,  H.  R.,  Studies  on  the  genus  Antfionomus  in  North  and  Central  America 
(Coleoptera:  Curculionidae)  II.  The  subgenus  Anthonomorphus  Dietz . 

Campbell,  J.  M.,  and  J.  D.  Marshall,  The  ocular  index  and  its  application  to 
the  taxonomy  of  the  Alleculidae  (Coleoptera) . 

Cartwright,  O.  L.,  Lectotype  designations  and  new  synonymy  in  the  genus 
Ataenius  (Coleoptera:  Scarabaeidae) . 

Hardy,  A.,  Studies  on  Oxygrylius  Casey  (Coleoptera:  Scarabaeidae:  Dynastinae) 

Herman,  L.  H.,  Jr.,  Nomenclatural  consideration  of  Nicrovhorus  (Coleoptera: 
Silphidae) . 

- A  revision  of  Orus  Casey.  I.  Subgenus  Leucorus  Casey  and  a 

new  subgenus  (Coleoptera:  Staphylinidae) . 

Kingsolver,  J.  M.,  The  genus  Neltumius  (Coleoptera:  Bruchidae) . 

Krause,  N.  L.  H.,  Some  leaf-mining  chrysomelids  of  Lantana  (Coleoptera) . 

Leech,  H.  B.,  A  new  species  of  Agabus  from  the  Death  Valley  region  of  California 
(Coleoptera:  Dytiscidae) . 

Lloyd,  J.  E.,  Description  of  a  brachypterous  firefly  female  of  the  genus  Photinus 
(Coleoptera:  Lampyridae) . 

Macnamara,  J.  P.,  Two  new  names  for  North  American  species  of  Sclonodon 
(Coleoptera:  Cebrionidae) . 

Marshall,  J.  D.,  see  Campbell,  J.  M.,  and  J.  D.  Marshall. 

Miller,  D.  C.,  Notes  on  Enochrus  and  Cymbiodyta  from  the  Pacific  Northwest 
(Coleoptera:  Hydrophilidae) . 

Moore,  I.,  Manda,  a  genus  new  to  the  Nearctic  region  (Coleoptera:  Staphylinidae) 

- A  new  key  to  the  subfamilies  of  the  Nearctic  Staphylinidae  and 

notes  on  their  classification . 

Russell,  L.,  Range  extension  for  two  introduced  dung  beetles  (Coleoptera: 
Scarabaeidae) . 

Triplehorn,  C.  A.,  A  synopsis  of  the  genus  Cryptoglossa  Sober  (Coleoptera: 
Tenebrionidae) . 

Van  Tassell,  E.  R.,  A  note  on  Hemiosus  exilis  LeConte  (Coleoptera:  Hydro¬ 
philidae) . 

Vaurie,  P.,  A  new  species  of  Hyphantus ,  a  synonym,  and  various  notes  (Cole¬ 
optera:  Curculionidae:  Otiorliynchinae) . 

Warner,  R.  E.,  Apion  longirostre  Olivier,  widely  distributed  in  North  America 
(Coleoptera:  Curculionidae) . 

- Ceutorhynchus  assimilis  (Payk.),  new  to  eastern  North  America 

(Coleoptera:  Curculionidae) . 


21 

33 

65 

95 

1 

59 

7 

42 

101 

122 

5 

112 

105 

92 

79 

127 

18 

69 

57 

83 

121 

43 
53 
37 
17 
61 


_ Unusual  host  records  for  Gymnaetron  pascuorum ,  Hexarthrum 

ulkei,  Chalcodermus  aeneus,  and  Hyper  a  nigrirostris  (Coleoptera:  Curculioni- 
dae) .  96 

_ Sphenophorus  cicatristriatus  damaging  blue  grass  lawns  in 

Washington  state  (Coleoptera:  Curculionidae) .  Ill 

Wooldridge,  D.  P.,  Two  new  species  of  Berosus  from  the  southeastern  United 

States  (Coleoptera:  Hydrophilidae) .  97 

Zimmerman,  E.  C.,  On  the  supposed  North  American  Trachodinae  (Coleoptera: 

Curculionidae) .  25 


Beetle  Talk .  24 

Book  Review .  52,  62 

Current  Research  Programs .  20,  41 

Literature  Notice .  36,  68,  94 

Notice .  4,  78 

LIST  OF  NEW  TAX  A  PROPOSED  IN  VOLUME  18,  1964 

Agabus  rumppi  Leech,  n.  sp.  (Dytiscidae) .  79 

Anthonomus  cognatus  Burke,  n.  sp.  (Curculionidae) .  15 

Berosus  corrini  Wooldridge,  n.  sp.  (Hydrophilidae) .  99 

Berosus  youngi  Wooldridge,  n.  sp.  (Hydrophilidae) .  97 

Cryptoglossa  laevis  papillosa  Triplehorn,  n.  subsp.  (Tenebrionidae) .  48 

Cymbiodyta  hatchi  Miller,  n.  sp.  (Hydrophilidae) .  76 

Cymbiodyta  leechi  Miller,  n,  sp.  (Hydrophilidae) .  75 

Enochrus  ( Enochrus )  piceus  Miller,  n.  sp.  (Hydrophilidae) .  70 

Hyphantus  fausti  Yaurie,  n.  sp.  (Curculionidae) .  37 

Mcmda  nearctica  Moore,  n.  sp.  (Staphylinidae) .  58 

Nivorus  Herman,  n.  subgen.  of  Orus  (Staphylinidae) .  119 

Oxacis  trirossi  Arnett,  n.  name  (Oedemeridae) .  34 

Philostratus  Zimmerman,  n.  gen.  (Curculionidae) .  29 

Selonodon  arizonensis  Macnamara,  n.  name  (Cebrionidae) .  18 

Selonodon  josephi  Macnamara,  n.  name  (Cebrionidae) .  18 

DATES  OF  PUBLICATION  OF  VOLUME  18,  1964 

March  (No.  1),  pp.  1-32,  April  22,  1964. 

June  (No.  2),  pp.  33-64,  July  17,  1964. 

September  (No.  3),  pp.  65-96,  September  24,  1964. 

December  (No.  4),  pp.  97-128,  February  5,  1965. 


// 

// 


THE 
COLEOPTERIS 


BULLETIN 


CARABIDAE:  On  Non-troglobites,  by  Barr .  1 

CEBRIONIDAE:  Selonodon  names,  by  Macnamara .  18 

CURCULIONIDAE:  Anthonomus  Studies  II,  by  Burke .  7 

CURCULIONIDAE:  On  Apion  longirostre,  by  Warner .  17 

CURCULIONIDAE:  Miarus  names,  by  Anderson .  21 

CURCULIONIDAE:  On  supposed  Trachodinae,  by  Zimmerman.  .  .  25 

SILPHIDAE:  The  Name  Nicrophorus,  by  Herman .  5 


Beetle  Talk .  24 

Current  Research  Programs .  20 

Notice  .  4 


THE  CATHOLIC  UNIVERSITY  OF  AMERICA  PRESS 
WASHINGTON  17,  D.  C. 


A  Quarterly  Publication  Devoted  ,  .  ]  BRARy 
_ to  'I**  Study  of  Beetles  HALL 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS*  BULLETIN 

Founded  1947  by  Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr. 

The  Coleopterists*  Bulletin  is  published  by  The  Catholic  University  of  America 
Press,  Washington  17,  D.  C.  and  edited  by  T.  J.  Spilman.  It  is  issued  four  times  a  year 
beginning  with  March.  All  business  matters  should  be  addressed  to  The  Coleopterists* 
Bulletin  at  the  Press.  Manuscripts  and  other  editorial  matter  should  be  addressed  to 
the  editor,  U.  S.  National  Museum,  Washington  25,  D.  C. 


Subscriptions:  The  subscription  price  for 
each  annual  volume  of  four  numbers  is 
$5.00  payable  in  advance.  All  sub¬ 
scriptions  begin  with  the  first  issue  of 
the  year  and  those  subscribing  later  in 
the  year  will  receive  the  back  issues  of 
the  volume. 


Back  volumes:  A  stock  of  back  volumes 
is  maintained  and  may  be  purchased  as 
follows:  3  to  date,  $5.00  ea.;  single 
numbers,  $1.25  each;  all  prices  postpaid. 
Missing  numbers:  Issues  lost  in  the  mail 
will  be  supplied  free  of  charge  if  no¬ 
tified  within  three  months  after  mailing. 


EDITORIAL  BOARD 


Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr.,  Ph.D. 

Department  of  Biology 
Catholic  University  of  America 

0.  L.  Cartwright 

U.  S.  National  Museum 
Washington  25,  D.  C. 

Eugene  J.  Gerberg,  Ph.D. 

Insect  Control  and  Research,  Inc. 
Baltimore,  Md. 


James  A.  Magner,  Ph.D.,  S.T.D. 

Business  Manager  of  the  Bulletin 
Catholic  University  of  America 

Theodore  J.  Spilman 

U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture 
Washington  25,  D.  C. 

Eileen  R.  Van  Tassell 

Department  of  Biology 
Catholic  University  of  America 


NOTICE  TO  AUTHORS 


Manuscripts  will  be  considered  ONLY 
FROM  SUBSCRIBERS.  Authors  should 
consult  STYLE  MANUAL  FOR  BIO¬ 
LOGICAL  JOURNALS,  prepared  by  the 
Committee  on  Form  and  Style  of  the  Con¬ 
ference  of  Biological  Editors,  and  pub¬ 
lished  by  the  American  Institute  of  Bio¬ 
logical  Sciences,  2000  P  Street,  N.W., 
Washington  6,  D.  C.  The  Bulletin  requires 
that  all  manuscripts  be  prepared  according 
to  instructions  in  the  Style  Manual.  Illus¬ 
trations  should  be  sent  mounted,  and 
numbered.  The  manuscript  should  be 
marked  to  indicate  the  location  of  text 
figures  or  the  position  of  full  page  plates. 

Manuscripts  will  be  acknowledged  upon 
receipt.  As  soon  as  possible  thereafter 
the  author  will  be  notified  as  to  accept¬ 
ance  after  review  by  the  Editorial  Board. 
If  the  manuscript  is  accepted,  a  tentative 
date  of  publication  will  be  set.  In  general, 


all  papers  will  be  published  in  their  order 
of  receipt,  but  the  editor  reserves  the 
right  to  use  articles  out  of  order  in  the 
interest  of  a  balanced  magazine. 

The  editor  will  make  no  text  changes 
without  advanced  notice  to  the  author. 
Galley  proof  will  be  sent  for  correction. 
These  galleys  are  sent  out  well  in  advance 
and  do  NOT  indicate  the  date  or  order 
of  publication. 

Twenty-five  tear  sheets  of  one  page 
notes  will  be  supplied  free  to  the  author  if 
requested  when  returning  galley  proofs. 
Reprints  of  articles  printed  free  of  extrane¬ 
ous  matter  will  be  supplied  with  or  with¬ 
out  covers  at  cost.  Reprints  MUST  be 
ordered  on  the  form  provided  when  re¬ 
turning  galley  proofs.  The  approximate 
cost  of  reprints  will  be  supplied  with  this 
form. 


EDITORIAL  POLICY 

Any  article,  note,  or  news  items  likely  cases ,  descriptions  of  new  species  must  be 
to  be  of  interest  to  readers  of  the  Bulletin  illustrated.  Descriptions  of  new  species  or 
will  be  considered.  Articles  with  illustra-  genera  MUST  contain  keys  or  be  cor¬ 
dons  are  particularly  desired,  and  in  all  related  with  existing  keys. 


A  QUARTERLY  PUBLICATION  DEVOTED  TO  THE  STUDY  OF  BEETLES 


The  Coleopterists’  Bulletin 

Volume  18  March  (No.  1)  1964 


NON-TROGLOBITIC  CARABIDAE  (COLEOPTERA)  FROM 
CAVES  IN  THE  UNITED  STATES1 

By  Thomas  C.  Barr,  Jr.2’  3 

Much  has  been  written  concerning  the  troglobitic  (^obligatorily  caverni- 
colous)  Carabidae  of  the  United  States.  Beetles  belonging  to  the  genus 
Pseudanophthalmus  Jeannel  and  other  troglobitic  genera  of  the  tribe  Tre- 
chini  are  widespread  in  caves  of  unglaciated  areas  in  the  eastern  United 
States,  within  the  region  underlain  by  Paleozoic  rocks  (see  Barr,  1960a, 
for  generic  key;  Barr,  1960b,  for  bibliography).  The  aberrant  troglobite 
Horologion  speokoites,  discovered  in  a  West  Virginia  cave  by  Valentine 
(1932),  is  probably  best  considered  the  sole  representative  of  the  tribe 
Horologionini.  It  was  placed  in  the  Psydrini  by  Van  Emden  (1936)  and 
in  a  distinct  family,  Horologionidae,  by  Jeannel  (1949).  Unfortunately, 
it  is  known  only  from  the  unique  male  type.  Rhadine  LeConte,  a  distinctive 
subgenus  of  Agonum  (Agonini),  includes  several  closely  similar  troglobitic 
species  which  inhabit  caves  in  the  eastern  Edwards  plateau  of  Texas  (Barr, 
1960c). 

It  is  the  purpose  of  this  paper  to  emphasize  the  repeated  occurrence  of 
a  limited  number  of  non-troglobitic  ground  beetles  in  caves  of  the  United 
States,  in  addition  to  the  troglobitic  representatives  mentioned.  In  the 
terminology  of  J.  R.  Schiner,  as  amplified  and  defined  by  Racovitza  (1907  ), 
these  are  troglophiles  if  they  can  and  do  complete  their  fife  cycle  within 
a  cave,  or  trogloxenes  if  they  commonly  occur  in  caves  but  must  return 
to  the  surface  for  at  least  part  of  their  life  cycle.  Troglophiles  also  occur 
outside  of  caves  in  dark,  humid  microenvironments,  but  do  not  exhibit  the 
same  degree  of  evolutionary  modification  which  restricts  troglobites  to  caves. 
The  term  cavernicole  means  simply,  “an  animal  living  in  caves.”  Troglobites, 
troglophiles,  and  trogloxenes  are  all  cavernicoles.  Cave  accidentals  are  not. 
This  system  of  classification,  still  unfamiliar  to  some  American  zoologists 
despite  widespread  acceptance  in  Europe,  is  summarized  in  Table  1.  An 


1  This  investigation  was  supported  in  part  by  a  grant  (G-18765)  from  the  National 
Science  Foundation. 

-  Department  of  Zoology  and  Institute  of  Speleology,  University  of  Kentucky, 
Lexington. 

I  wish  to  thank  Dr.  Philip  J.  Darlington,  Jr.,  Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology, 
Harvard  University,  and  Dr.  Carl  Lindroth,  Zoological  Institute,  University  of  Lund, 
Sweden,  for  assistance  in  specific  determinations  of  bembidiines.  Leslie  Hubricht, 
Meridian,  Mississippi;  Richard  E.  Graham,  Rutgers  University;  John  R.  Holsinger, 
University  of  Kentucky;  and  James  R.  Reddell,  Austin,  Texas,  collected  some  of 
the  material  reported  in  this  paper. 


2 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


example  drawn  from  the  Carabidae  is  given  for  each  category.  I  assume 
that  a  non-troglobitic  carabid  may  be  considered  a  troglophile  if  a  cave 
population  of  the  species  includes  several  larvae  and/or  tenerals. 

Table  1. 

Classification  of  Cave  Animals 

I.  Cavernicoles 

A.  Obligate 

1.  Troglobites — e.g.  Pseudanophthalmus  pubescens  (Horn) 

B.  Facultative 

1.  Troglophiles  (entire  life  cycle  in  caves) — e.g.  Bembidion 
lacunarium  (Zimmermann) 

2.  Trogloxenes  (only  part  of  life  cycle  in  caves) 

a.  Habitual — e.g.  Agonum  refiexum  (LeConte) 

b.  Occasional — e.g.  Patrobus  longicornis  Say 


II.  Accidentals 

E.g.  Harpalus  ( Pseudophonus )  compar  LeConte 

Many  carabids  occur  sporadically  in  the  crepuscular  (^twilight)  zone 
of  caves  or  are  washed  considerable  distances  underground  by  sinking 
streams.  These  can  only  be  considered  accidentals  or,  if  commonly  en¬ 
countered  in  caves,  threshhold  trogloxenes.  They  include  common  epigean 
species,  for  the  most  part.  For  this  group,  I  have  U.  S.  records  of  species 
belonging  to  the  following  genera:  Acupalpus,  Agonoderus*  Agonum* 
Amara,  Anillinus*  Anisodactylus*  Badister,  Bembidion  *  Brady cellus, 
Calathus,  Carabus,  Colliuris,  Dyschirius,  Galeritula,  Harpalus  *  Helluo- 
morphoides,  Lebia,  Micratopus,  Nebria*  Notiophilus,  Odontonyx,  Patro¬ 
bus*  Pterostichus*  Scaphinotus,  Selenophorus*  Sphaeroderus,  Steno- 
lophus*  and  Tachys*  Repeated  occurrence  of  a  genus  is  indicated  by  an 
asterisk  (*).  The  other  genera  are  probably  all  accidentals. 

This  list  shows  at  least  two  things:  first,  that  a  variety  of  carabids  crawl, 
fall,  or  are  washed  into  caves;  second,  that  most  of  the  group  consists  of 
beetles  usually  found  in  meadows  or  fields,  or  under  cover  alongside 
streams.  Common  riparian  species,  such  as  Agonum  extensicolle  (Say), 
Nebria  pallipes  Say,  and  Patrobus  longicornis  (Say)  apparently  wander  up 
the  banks  of  streams  issuing  from  caves  and  follow  the  streams  under¬ 
ground.  I  have  never  found  Nebria  outside  of  the  crepuscular  zone,  but 
A .  extensicolle  and  especially  P.  longicornis  occasionally  wander  a  hundred 
meters  or  more  inside  a  cave.  It  is  probably  significant  that  a  late  September 
(1963)  abundance  of  P.  longicornis  along  the  Little  Barren  River  in  Green 
County,  Kentucky,  coincided  with  the  appearance  of  numerous  individuals 
of  the  species  along  the  stream  in  Woodard  Cave,  near  Donansburg.  The 
cave  stream  is  a  direct  tributary  of  the  Little  Barren.  The  Scaphinotus 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


3 


observed,  S.  (Steniridia)  loedingi  Valentine  and  S.  (Steniridia)  andrewsi 
germari  Chaudoir,  were  seen  near  entrances  walking  over  the  rock  walls 
of  the  caves.  They  were  probably  hunting  for  snails,  many  of  which  were 
nearby.  The  small,  eyeless,  depigmented  bembidiines  of  the  genus  Anillinus 
Casey  show  some  of  the  morphological  attributes  of  good  cave  species,  but 
are  more  common  in  deep  soil  and  humus  than  in  caves,  where  they  prob¬ 
ably  occur  under  special,  unknown  conditions  or  accidentally. 

Certain  genera  which  are  common  on  the  surface  in  the  cave  regions 
are  missing  from  the  list  or  have  been  found  only  once  or  twice  in  hundreds 
of  caves.  There  are  only  two  cave  records  for  Calathus,  and  one  of  these 
was  at  the  bottom  of  a  pit  30  meters  deep.  Both  records  are  for  single 
individuals.  There  is  one  cave  record  for  a  single  specimen  of  Lebia  ornata 
Say,  taken  in  a  small  Alabama  cave  in  February,  where  it  may  have  been 
hibernating.  Species  of  Lebia  are  predominantly  arboreal,  however,  and 
are  not  likely  to  be  accidentally  washed  into  caves  or  to  crawl  along  the 
banks  of  streams  into  caves.  The  same  generalization  may  be  applied  to 
the  species  of  Calosoma,  which  I  have  never  found  in  a  cave.  It  is  more 
difficult  to  account  for  the  absence  of  common  streamside  species  of 
Chlaenius,  Ardistomis,  and  Clivina. 

Five  common  epigean  species  are  frequently  found  in  caves  of  the 
eastern  United  States,  the  Ozark  plateau,  and  Texas.  Bembidion  ( Peryphus ) 
lacunarium  (Zimmermann),  Agonum  (Platynus)  reflexwn  (LeConte),  and 
Atranus  pubescens  (Dejean)  occur  in  caves  throughout  the  region.  Bem¬ 
bidion  (Amerizus)  wingatei  (Bland)  is  a  frequent  inhabitant  of  caves  from 
eastern  Kentucky  to  West  Virginia  and  Pennsylvania.  Tachys  ( Tachyura ) 
jerrugineus  (Dejean)  occurs  rarely  in  eastern  caves,  but  is  extremely  com¬ 
mon  in  both  the  limestone  caves  of  central  Texas  and  the  gypsum  caves 
of  northwest  Texas,  as  shown  by  the  abundant  collections  of  Mr.  James 
R.  Reddell.  I  have  seen  all  five  species  from  many  caves,  have  seen  many 
tenerals,  and  have  no  doubt  that  all  except  Agonum  reflexum  are  troglo- 
philes.  They  have  no  close  troglobitic  relatives.  A.  reflexum  is  an  habitual 
trogloxene  which  readily  enters  the  aphotic  zone. 

Two  groups  of  troglophiles  remain  for  consideration.  One  is  the  genus 
Trechus,  in  the  tribe  Trechini.  T.  (Microtrechus)  tennesseensis  Barr  and 
T.  (Microtrechus)  tuckaleechee  Barr  are  known  only  from  East  Tennessee 
caves,  and  T.  (T.)  cumberlandus  Barr  occurs  in  caves  and  deep  ravines  in 
the  Cumberland  plateau  of  Tennessee  and  Kentucky  (Barr,  1962).  Cave 
tenerals  of  all  three  species  have  been  collected,  and  they  undoubtedly 
reproduce  in  the  caves.  A  small  colony  of  T.  (T.)  ovipennis  californicus 
Motschulsky  formerly  inhabited  Empire  Cave,  Santa  Cruz  Co.,  California, 
where  Mr.  Richard  E.  Graham  collected  specimens  for  me.  1  have  seen 
no  tenerals  from  Empire  Cave.  The  cave  is  now  permanently  closed.  None 
of  these  four  species  shows  reduction  of  eyes  or  pigmentation  in  the  cave 
colonies. 

In  the  subgenus  Rhadine  (genus  Agonum)  we  find  not  only  troglobitic 
species  but  several  troglophilic  species,  as  well  as  species  which  probably 
never  enter  caves.  Some  Rhadine  can  be  trapped  in  large  numbers  from 
rodent  burrows.  In  caves  they  are  often  very  abundant.  I  treated  the 


4 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


cavernicoious  Rhadine  (both  troglobites  and  troglophiles)  in  detail  in  an 
earlier  paper  (Barr,  1960c).  The  obviously  and  supposedly  troglophilic 
species  known  at  that  time  were  A.  (R.)  caudatum  (LeConte) — Va.,  Tenn., 
Ala.;  A.  (R.)  jonesi  Barr — Ala.;  A.  (R.)  ozarkense  (Sanderson  and  Miller) 
— Arkansas;  A.  (R.)  longicolle  (Benedict) — N.  Mex.;  A.  (R.)  rubrum 
Barr — Texas;  A.  (R.)  howdeni  Barr  and  Lawrence — Texas;  and  A.  (R.) 
babcocki  Barr — Texas.  Since  writing  that  paper  I  have  seen  three  other, 
undescribed  species  of  Rhadine,  probably  troglophiles,  from  Oklahoma, 
Texas,  and  Arizona,  respectively.  A.  (R.)  longiceps  (Van  Dyke),  from 
southwest  Texas,  has  also  appeared  in  recent  cave  collections. 

In  summary,  the  non-troglobitic  cave  carabids  of  the  United  States,  as 
presently  known,  consist  of  three  groups:  (1)  a  large  number  of  accidentals 
and  threshhold  trogloxenes;  (2)  a  small  assemblage  (4  troglophiles  and 
1  habitual  trogloxene)  of  common  epigean  species  which  readily  adapt  to 
cave  life;  and  (3)  a  moderate  number  (15  species)  of  troglophiles  closely 
related  to  the  two  principal  lineages  of  troglobitic  carabids  in  the  United 
States. 


Literature  Cited 

Barr,  T.  C. 

1960a.  A  new  genus  of  cave  beetle  (Carabidae:  Trechini)  from  southwestern 
Virginia  with  a  key  to  the  genera  of  the  Trechini  of  North  America  north 
of  Mexico.  Coleop.  Bull.  14:65-70. 

1960b.  Introduction  To:  Symposium,  Speciation  and  raciation  in  cavernicoles. 
American  Midi.  Nat.  64:1-9. 

1960c.  The  cavernicoious  beetles  of  the  subgenus  Rhadine,  genus  Agonum 
(Coleoptera:  Carabidae).  Ibid.,  45-65. 

Jeannel,  R. 

1949.  Les  coleopteres  cavernicoles  de  la  region  des  Appalaches.  Etude  sys- 
tematique.  Notes  Biospeologiques,  4,  Publ.  Mus.  Nat.  Hist.  Nat.  (Paris), 
no.  12:37-104. 

Racovitza,  E.  G. 

1907.  Essai  sur  les  problemes  biospeologiques.  Arch.  zool.  exp.  et  gen. 
36:371-488. 

Valentine,  J.  M. 

1932.  Horologion,  a  new  genus  of  cave  beetles  (fam.  Carabidae).  Ann  Ent.  Soc. 
America  25:1-8,  pi.  1-2. 

Van  Emden,  F. 

1936.  Bemerkungen  zur  Klassification  der  Carabidae:  Carabini  und  Harpalinae 
piliferae.  Ent.  Blatter  32:12-52,  11  figs. 


NOTICE 

The  French  magazine  L’Entomologiste,  Revue  d’Amateur,  has  in  each  issue  a 
section  called  “Offres  et  demandes  d’echanges.”  That  section  is  loaded  with  offers 
of  and  requests  for  beetles. 

Wanted:  Cerambycidae  from  the  eastern  United  States.  Offered  in  exchange: 
Beetles  from  the  western  United  States.  By  Donald  E.  Rich,  4063  Moore  St.,  Los 
Angeles  66,  California. 


1964 


THE  COL  EO  PTE  R I  STS'  BULLETIN 


5 


NOMENCLATURAL  CONSIDERATION  OF  NICROPHORUS 

(COLEOPTERA:  SILPHIDAE) 

By  Lee  H.  Herman,  Jr.1 

Fabricius  (1775)  erected  a  new  genus  using  the  name  Nicrophorus  in¬ 
cluding  in  it  N.  germanicus  (L.)  and  N.  vulgaris.  The  generic  name  was 
used  subsequently  by  Fabricius  (1776,  1778,  1787,  1792,  1800),  Olivier 
(1790),  Latreille  (1796)  and  others  not  cited  here.  However,  Illiger 
(1798)  used  Necrophorus  and  was  followed  in  that  spelling  in  1801  by 
Fabricius.  Subsequent  workers  have  used  the  names  interchangeably.  The 
Leng  Catalogue  (1920)  used  Necrophorus  but  Hatch  (1928)  used 
Nicrophorus;  supplements  to  the  Leng  Catalogue  retained  Nicrophorus. 
Necrophorus  was  acknowledged  by  Hatch  (1932)  as  an  emended  spelling, 
and  he  further  stated,  “There  is  widespread  authority  for  the  use  of  such 
an  emended  spelling  .  .  but  did  not  mention  which  should  be  accepted. 
Mazokhin-Porshnyakov  (1953)  used  Necrophorus  and  Mrocykowski 
(1959)  used  Nicrophorus,  examples  of  the  most  recent  new  species  de¬ 
scriptions  using  these  names.  Recently  Necrophorus  has  been  listed  as  a 
junior  synonym  by  Hatch  (1957)  and  Arnett  (1961). 

Another  error  was  in  the  use  of  Nigrophorus  by  Fabricius  (1787)  on 
page  48  and  Nicrophorus  on  page  viii.  The  International  Code  of  Zoological 
Nomenclature  (1961)  states  an  emendation  must  be  a  “.  .  .  demonstrably 
intentional  change  in  the  original  spelling  .  .  [Art.  33(a)].  Nigrophorus 
does  not  satisfy  this  definition  since  the  original  spelling  was  cited  in  the 
same  publication  and  cited  again  by  its  author  (Fabricius)  in  1792.  The 
change  is  therefore  unintentional,  not  an  emendation,  and  as  an  incorrect 
subsequent  spelling  has  no  nomenclatural  status  [Art.  33(b)]. 

If  Necrophorus  is  considered  an  unintentional  change  then  Art.  33(b) 
applies  and  the  name  is  rejected,  but  since  the  name  is  used  several  times 
by  Illiger  (1798,  pp.  352-355,  498,  508)  and  Fabricius  (1801,  pp.  xiv, 
333)  it  can  be  considered  an  emendation  (intentional  change). 

Emendations  are  either  justified  or  unjustified.  The  former  “.  .  .  is  the 
correction  of  an  incorrect  original  spelling  .  .  [Art.  33(a)  (i)].  “The 
original  spelling  of  a  name  is  to  be  retained  as  the  ‘correct  original  spelling’ 
unless  there  is  in  the  original  publication  clear  evidence  of  an  inadvertent 
error  .  .  [Art.  32(a)  (ii) ]. 

This  problem  seems  to  be  one  of  transliteration.  Transliteration  of  the 
Greek  vck pos  is  Necros  and  translates,  a  dead  body  or  corpse;  the  Greek 
-phore  translates  bearer  or  carrier.  The  prefix  Nicro-  translates  or  trans¬ 
literates  from  neither  Greek  nor  Latin.  One  may  presume  that  Nicrophorus 
was  an  incorrect  transliteration  and  should  have  been  Necrophorus  meaning 
corpse  carrier,  a  habit  characteristic  of  this  genus.  There  is  no  evidence 
of  a  “lapsus  calami”  since  the  name  Nicrophorus  was  used  twice  in  the 
original  publication  (Fabricius  1775,  pp.  1,  71)  and  several  times  subse¬ 
quently  including  Fabricius  (1778,  p.  Ill)  when  Nicrophorus  was  used 
with  the  Greek  letters  w*po</>opo?  beside  it. 

1  Catholic  University  of  America,  Department  of  Biology,  Washington  17,  D.  C. 


6 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


Assuming  this  to  be  an  incorrect  transliteration  Art.  32(a)  (ii)  would 
apply  in  stating  .  .  (incorrect  transliterations  .  .  .  are  not  to  be  consid¬ 
ered  inadvertent  errors  .  .  the  original  spelling  should  therefore  be 
retained  as  correct. 

By  definition,  the  change  made  by  Illiger  (1798)  was  an  unjustified 
emendation.  Art.  33(a)  (ii)  states,  “.  .  .  any  other  emendation  is  an  ‘un¬ 
justified  emendation’;  the  name  thus  emended  has  status  in  nomenclature 
with  its  own  date  and  author,  and  is  a  junior  objective  synonym  of  the 
name  in  its  original  form.” 

The  correct  name  is  Nicrophorus  Fabricius,  1775  [Art.  32(a)  (ii)], 
rather  than  Necrophorus  Illiger,  1798,  a  junior  objective  synonym  of  the 
original  [Art.  33(a)  (ii)].  Nigrophorus  has  no  status  [Art.  33(b)]. 

The  type-species  for  Nicrophorus  is  N.  vespillo  (L.);  a  name  listed  as  a 
junior  synonym  of  N.  vulgaris  F.  in  the  original  publication.  The  designa¬ 
tion  was  by  Latreille  (1810,  p.  427). 

Literature  Cited 

Arnett,  R.  H. 

1961.  The  Beetles  of  the  United  States.  Part  II.  Fascicle  17.  The  Catholic  Uni¬ 
versity  of  America  Press.  Washington,  D.  C.  P.  333. 

Fabricius,  J.  C. 

1775.  Systema  Entomologiae.  Pp.  1,  71.  Lipsiae. 

1776.  Genera  Insectorum.  Pp.  2,  25.  Chilonii. 

1778.  Philosophia  Entomologia.  Pp.  90,  111,  156. 

1787.  Mantissa  Insectorum.  Part  I.  Pp.  viii,  48.  Hafniae. 

1792.  Entomologia  Systemica.  Pp.  xiii,  246,  247.  Hafniae. 

1800.  Epitome  Entomologiae  Fabricianne  Sive  Nomenclatore  Entomologicus 
emendatus.  Pp.  viii,  3,  38. 

1801.  Systema  Eleutheratorum.  Part  I.  Pp.  xiv,  333.  Kiliae. 

Hatch,  M.  H. 

1928.  Silphidae  II.  Coleopterorum  Catalogus.  Pars.  95.  P.  126. 

1932.  “Necrophorus”  or  “Nicrophorus.”  Jour.  New  York  Ent.  Soc.  40:391. 
1957.  The  Beetles  of  the  Pacific  Northwest.  University  of  Washington  Press. 
Seattle.  P.  11. 

Illiger,  J.  K.  W. 

1798.  Verzeichniss  Der  Kafer  Preussens.  Pp.  352-355,  498,  508. 

Latreille,  P.  A. 

1796.  Precis  Des  Caracteres.  Pp.  12,  103.  Bordeaux. 

1810.  Considerations  Generates  Sur  L’ordre  Naturel  Des  Crustaces,  Des  Arach- 
nides,  Et  Des  Insectes.  P.  427.  Paris. 

Leng,  C.  W. 

1920.  Catalogue  of  the  Coleoptera  of  America,  North  of  Mexico.  Mount 
Vernon,  N.  Y. 

Mazokhin-Porshnyakov,  G.  A. 

1953.  Coleoptera,  Necrophorini  of  Northeast  China.  Zool.  Zhurn.  32:235-236. 
P.  236.  (Not  seen.) 

Mrocykowski,  M. 

1959.  Nicrophorus  ( Nicrophorus )  kieticus  sp.  n.  from  the  Solomon  Islands 
(Coleoptera,  Silphidae).  Ann.  Zool.  Warsaw.  18:65-69.  P.  66.  (Not  seen.) 

Olivier,  A.  G. 

1790.  Entomologie  au  Histoire  Naturelle  Des  Insectes.  Coleopteres.  Tome  II. 
No.  10.  Paris. 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


7 


STUDIES  ON  THE  GENUS  ANTHONOMUS  IN  NORTH  AND 
CENTRAL  AMERICA  (COLEOPTERA:  CURCULIONIDAE) 
II.  THE  SUBGENUS  ANTHONOMORPHUS  DIETZ1  2 

By  Horace  R.  Burke 

The  subgenus  Anthonomorphus  was  erected  by  Dietz  (1891:194)  to 
include  Anthonomus  fulvus  LeConte,  Anthonomus  peninsularis  Dietz,  and 
Anthonomus  pervilis  Dietz.  Dietz  considered  the  size  and  position  of  the 
eyes  to  be  the  most  distinctive  characters  of  the  subgenus,  describing  these 
as  “small,  subrostral  in  their  position  and  somewhat  approximate  upon  the 
front.”  Comparison  of  the  size  of  the  eyes  of  members  of  this  subgenus  with 
those  of  other  Anthonomus  indicates  that  this  character  is  of  no  taxonomic 
value  in  defining  the  subgenus;  however,  the  position  of  the  eyes  is  a  useful 
criterion  for  distinguishing  Anthonomorphus  from  most  other  species- 
groups  of  Anthonomus.  The  eyes  appear  to  be  located  on  the  base  of  the 
rostrum  rather  than  on  the  head;  this  illusion  is  accentuated  by  the  head 
being  somewhat  conical  and  more  or  less  constricted  on  the  sides  behind 
the  eyes. 

While  searching  for  additional  characters  to  define  Anthonomorphus , 
a  number  of  similarities  between  this  subgenus  and  Trichobaropsis  Dietz 
were  noted.  Trichobaropsis  was  proposed  as  a  subgenus  by  Dietz  (1891: 
196)  to  include  Anthonomus  texanus  Dietz,  and  was  separated  from  other 
subgenera  primarily  on  the  basis  of  the  emarginate  prosternum  and  the 
seventh  funicular  segment  of  the  antenna  being  somewhat  more  closely 
associated  with  the  club.  The  first  of  these  characters  is  shared  with  several 
species  of  Anthonomus,  including  fulvus  and  peninsularis,  while  the  second 
one  alone  does  not  appear  sufficiently  distinct  to  justify  recognizing 
Trichobaropsis  as  a  subgenus.  Since  good  subgeneric  characters  are  lack¬ 
ing  and  as  texanus  shares  many  features  in  common  with  fulvus  and 
peninsularis,  Trichobaropsis  is  here  considered  a  junior  synonym  of 
A  nthonomorphus. 

Males  of  Anthonomorphus  can  be  readily  recognized  by  the  meso- 
trochanters.  The  male  mesotrochanter  (figs.  11,  13)  is  nearly  parallel¬ 
sided,  with  the  apex  broadly  angulate  or  obliquely  truncate,  and  the  extreme 
apical  portion  is  free  from  the  side  of  the  femur.  The  outer  margin  of  the 
mesotrochanter  of  the  male  does  not  form  a  continuous  line  with  the  inner 
margin  of  the  femur  as  in  other  Anthonomus,  including  females  of  An¬ 
thonomorphus.  The  mesotrochanter  (fig.  12)  of  the  female  is  elongate- 
triangular,  with  the  apex  acutely  pointed  and  applied  closely  to  the  side 
of  the  femur. 

Some  characters  of  apparent  value  in  delimiting  Anthonomorphus  were 
also  found  in  the  male  genitalia.  The  median  lobe  (figs.  7-10)  is  a  fairly 
stout,  flattened  structure  with  rather  long,  slender  basal  apodemes.  The  most 


1  The  first  paper  of  this  series  was  published  in  the  Southwestern  Naturalist,  1962, 
7(3-4) :  202-2 1 0. 

2  Technical  Contribution  No.  4514,  Department  of  Entomology,  Texas  Agricultural 
Experiment  Station,  Texas  A  &  M  University,  College  Station. 


8 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


distinctive  feature  of  this  component  of  the  genitalia  is  the  broad  apex 
with  the  usually  well  defined  median  projection  and  poorly  to  well  devel¬ 
oped  lateral  processes.  This  form  of  apex  of  the  median  lobe  has  not  been 
observed  in  any  other  of  the  approximately  100  species  of  Anthonomus  I 
have  dissected  for  examination  of  genitalia.  In  addition  to  possessing  char¬ 
acters  apparently  diagnostic  for  the  subgenus,  the  median  lobe  is  also 
useful  in  separating  species  of  Anthonomorphus.  It  should  be  used  with 
caution  for  this  purpose  since  considerable  intraspecific  variation  was 
observed  in  the  material  at  hand.  However,  this  does  not  present  a  problem 
in  recognition  of  the  species  since  they  are  easily  identifiable  by  external 
characters. 

An  additional  sexual  dimorphic  character  is  found  in  the  apical  armature 
of  the  metatibiae.  The  metatibia  of  the  male  is  expanded  apically  into  a 
large  mucro  (fig.  14)  which  is  roughly  triangular,  somewhat  twisted,  and 
deeply  concave  on  the  outer  side.  The  female  mucro  (fig.  15)  is  much 
smaller  and  more  spike-like  in  appearance.  The  two  sexes  may  be  easily 
separated  by  this  character,  a  fact  which  to  my  knowledge  has  not  hereto¬ 
fore  been  mentioned  in  connection  with  Anthonomus.  Some  other  species 
of  the  genus  have  this  type  of  male  mucro,  but  it  is  usually  not  as  prominent 
as  in  Anthonomorphus. 

In  addition  to  the  weevils  originally  placed  here  by  Dietz,  several  Nearctic 
and  Neotropical  species  have  been  assigned  to  Anthonomorphus  and  Tri- 
chobaropsis  by  more  recent  workers  (Hustache,  1929;  Schenkling  and 
Marshall,  1934;  Voss,  1944).  I  have  examined  several  of  these  species 
(A.  eugenii  Cano,  A.  julvipes  Champion,  A.  grandis  Boheman,  A.  griseis- 
quamis  Champion,  and  A.  rubiginosus  Champion)  in  light  of  the  new 
taxonomic  characters  presented  here  and  they  are  clearly  not  assignable  to 
Anthonomorphus.  It  is  obvious  from  descriptions  alone  that  other  species 
have  been  incorrectly  assigned  to  the  subgenus.  Anthonomus  grandis  is 
the  only  one  of  the  above-mentioned  species  which  presents  much  of  a 
problem  as  to  its  relationship  to  members  of  the  subgenus.  I  have  been 
unable  to  find  characters  which  would  exclude  females  of  grandis  from 
Anthonomorphus,  but  it  is  quite  evident  from  males  that  this  species  be¬ 
longs  elsewhere.  Although  males  of  grandis  resemble  species  of  Anthon¬ 
omorphus  by  having  the  eyes  evenly  convex  and  somewhat  subrostral,  and 
the  head  feebly  constricted  on  the  sides  behind  the  eyes,  they  differ  dis¬ 
tinctly  in  the  mesotrochanters  and  genitalia. 

This  study  is  based  on  material  in  the  following  collections:  Boll  Weevil 
Research  Laboratory  of  the  U.S.  Dept,  of  Agriculture,  British  Museum 
(Natural  History),  Canadian  National  Collection,  California  Academy  of 
Sciences,  California  Department  of  Agriculture,  Carnegie  Museum,  Cornell 
University,  Illinois  Natural  History  Survey,  Museum  of  Comparative  Zo¬ 
ology,  Michigan  State  University,  Ohio  State  University,  Oklahoma  State 
University,  Texas  A  &  M  University,  University  of  California  at  Berkeley, 
University  of  Kansas,  U.S.  National  Museum,  and  the  private  collections 
of  D.  G.  Kissinger  and  C.  W.  O’Brien.  I  am  deeply  indebted  to  persons  in 
charge  of  the  above  collections  for  their  generous  loan  of  material  for 
study.  I  would  especially  like  to  thank  Hugh  B.  Leech  of  the  California 
Academy  of  Sciences  for  the  loan  of  a  large  series  of  peninsularis  and  for 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


9 


making  available  to  me  most  of  the  specimens  on  which  the  description  of 
cognatus  is  based.  The  assistance  of  V.  S.  House  of  College  Station,  Texas, 
in  making  the  photographs  included  in  this  paper  is  also  gratefully  ac¬ 
knowledged. 

Measurements  reported  herein  were  made  as  described  in  the  first  paper 
of  this  series. 


Subgenus  Anthonomorphus  Dietz 

Anthonomorphus  Dietz,  1891,  p.  194  (type,  A.  fulvus  LeConte,  by  original 
designation);  Voss,  1944,  p.  45;  Gilbert,  1953,  p.  41. 

Trichobaropsis  Dietz,  1891,  p.  196  (type,  A.  texanus  Dietz,  by  original 
designation  and  monotypy).  (NEW  SYNONYMY) 

Body  elongate-oval;  pubescent.  Rostrum  slender,  slightly  to  distinctly  curved;  dor- 
sally  with  three  prominent  carinae  extending  from  base  to  point  opposite  antennal 
attachments;  lateral  rostral  groove  directed  toward  lower  front  margin  of  eye.  An¬ 
tennal  funicle  7-segmented;  club  elongate-oval.  Eyes  evenly,  moderately  convex,  not 
free  behind;  located  at  base  of  rostrum.  Head  conical,  sides  feebly  to  distinctly  con¬ 
stricted  behind  eyes;  front  foveate.  Prothorax  with  sides  feebly  rounded  and  strongly 
narrowed  from  base  to  apex;  prosternum  emarginate  before  coxae.  Elytra  slightly 
to  distinctly  wider  at  base  than  prothorax;  humeri  feebly  to  strongly  rounded. 
Femora  bidentate,  outer  tooth  smaller  and  may  be  absent  on  hind  femora.  Meso- 
trochanter  of  male  prominent,  apex  broadly  angulate  to  obliquely  truncate,  ex¬ 
treme  apical  portion  free  from  side  of  femur;  female  mesotrochanter  elongate- 
triangular,  closely  applied  to  side  of  femur  throughout  entire  length,  apex  acutely 
pointed.  Tibiae  along  inner  margins  distinctly  sinuate  and  finely  carinate;  metatibia 
of  male  with  large,  triangular  apical  mucro,  that  of  female  small,  inconspicuous, 
spike-like.  Tarsal  claws  each  bearing  a  long,  slender  tooth  on  inner  side.  Median 
lobe  of  male  genitalia  feebly  curved  in  lateral  view,  flattened  dorsoventrally;  median 
dorsal  and  ventral  pre-phallotremic  areas  entirely  membranous;  endophallus  (in¬ 
ternal  sac)  bearing  numerous  small  spines;  apex  broad,  with  a  short  median  pro¬ 
jection  and  with  poorly  to  well  developed  lateral  processes. 

Key  to  Species  of  the  Subgenus  Anthonomorphus 

(Measurements  made  from  30  specimens  of  each  species) 

1.  Coarse,  white  pubescence  forming  patterns  on  elytra,  elsewhere  vestiture  finer,  less 
dense  (fig.  1);  meso-  and  metasternum,  and  sometimes  also  abdominal  sternites, 
piceous  or  black,  distinctly  darker  than  rest  of  body;  length  of  body,  3.70-5.37, 


average  4.62  mm.;  width,  1.81-2.59,  average  2.18  mm. - FULVUS 

Elytral  pubescence  moderately  dense,  evenly  distributed,  never  forming  patterns; 

meso-  and  metasternum  not  noticeably  differing  in  color  from  rest  of  body -  2 


2.  Prothorax  at  base  distinctly  narrower  than  elytra;  length  of  prothorax  along  dorsal 

midline  equal  to,  or  but  slightly  greater  than,  width  of  an  elytron  immediately 
behind  humerus;  humeri  prominent  (fig.  3);  length  of  body,  4.18-5.70,  average 

4.92;  width,  2.00-2.74,  average  2.44  mm. - PENINSULARIS 

Prothorax  at  base  only  slightly  narrower  than  elytra  (figs.  2,  4);  length  of  prothorax 

along  dorsal  midline  distinctly  greater  than  width  of  an  elytron  behind  humerus  -  3 

3.  Elytral  humeri  slightly  rounded  (fig.  4);  most  setae  on  antennal  funicle  tapering  to 

fine  points;  antennal  club  not  longer  than  preceding  four  funicular  segments 
combined;  body  robust;  length  of  body,  4.33-5.55,  average  4.88  mm.;  width, 

1.96-2.59,  average  2.21  mm. - COGNATUS 

Elytral  humeri  less  strongly  rounded  (fig.  2);  most  setae  on  antennal  funicle 
parallel-sided  with  blunt  apices;  antennal  club  slightly  to  distinctly  longer  than 
preceding  four  funicular  segments  combined,  sometimes  as  long  as  preceding 
five;  body  narrower,  usually  smaller;  length  of  body,  3.22-4.80,  average  4.11  mm.; 
width,  1.59-2.22,  average  1.89. - TEXANUS 


Volume  18 


10 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Figures  1-6,  Anthonomus  spp.  1 — A.  fulvus,  male,  dorsal  view.  2 — A.  texanus, 
male,  dorsal  view.  3 — A.  peninsularis,  male,  dorsal  view.  4 — A.  cognatus,  holotype 
male,  dorsal  view.  5 — A.  peninsularis,  female,  lateral  view.  6 — A.  cognatus,  female, 
lateral  view. 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


1  1 

Anthonomus  fulvus  LeConte 
(Figs.  1,  7,  13-16) 

Anthonomus  fulvus  LeConte,  1858,  p.  79;  LeConte  and  Horn,  1876,  p. 

197;  Dietz,  1891,  p.  195. 

Anthonomus  fulvus  is  easily  recognized  by  its  reddish  brown  body  with 
the  darker  meso-  and  metathorax,  and  the  distinctive  pattern  of  white 
scale-like  pubescence  on  the  elytra.  The  prothorax  is  usually  more  closely 
and  coarsely  punctate  than  in  other  members  of  the  subgenus.  The  male 
median  lobe  is  more  strongly  narrowed  apically  than  in  other  Anthonomor- 
phus  and  the  apex  usually  has  only  poorly  defined  median  and  lateral 
processes. 

This  species  was  described  by  LeConte  from  specimens  sent  him  by 
Lt.  Horace  Haldeman  from  Ringgold  Barracks  at  Rio  Grande  City  in  Starr 
County,  Texas.  I  have  seen  no  specimens  of  fulvus  which  were  definitely 
known  to  have  been  collected  in  the  Lower  Rio  Grande  Valley  of  Texas, 
but  the  occurrence  of  the  species  there  would  not  be  surprising  since  it  is 
quite  common  about  150  miles  north  of  the  area.  Haldeman  collected  in 
several  localities  in  southern  and  southwestern  Texas,  all  of  which  are  within 
the  known  range  of  fulvus.  In  view  of  the  lack  of  specimens  of  this  large 
and  distinctive  species  from  the  rather  extensively  collected  Lower  Rio 
Grande  Valley,  the  possibility  exists  that  the  examples  sent  to  LeConte 
from  Ringgold  Barracks  were  actually  collected  elsewhere  in  the  State. 

There  is  a  male  and  female  specimen  of  fulvus  bearing  type  labels  and 
a  third  specimen  labeled  only  “Tex”  in  the  LeConte  Collection.  In  addi¬ 
tion  to  these,  I  have  examined  171  specimens  from  the  following  localities: 
KA  NS  A  S — CLARK  CO.:  (no  other  locality  data).  EDWARDS  CO.: 
Nettleton.  GOVE  CO.  (no  other  locality  data).  PAWNEE  CO.:  Larned. 
SCOTT  CO.:  Scott  State  Park.  SEDGWICK  CO.:  Mount  Hope.  ST.  JOHN 
CO.  (no  other  locality  data).  SUMNER  CO.:  Wellington.  THOMAS  CO. 
(no  other  locality  data).  WALLACE  CO.:  Wallace.  OKLAHOMA — 
CARTER  CO.:  "  Ardmore.  CHOCTAW  CO.:  Hugo.  GRADY  CO.: 
Chickasha.  TEXAS — BEXAR  CO.:  San  Antonio.  BRAZOS  CO.:  College 
Station.  BREWSTER  CO.:  Marathon.  DALLAS  CO.:  Dallas.  LAVACA 
CO.:  Hallettsville.  LEE  CO.:  Fedor.  MARION  CO.:  Jefferson.  REFUGIO 
CO.:  Austwell.  SAN  PATRICIO  CO.:  2  mi.  S.  Gregory.  VICTORIA  CO.: 
Victoria. 

I  have  also  seen  a  specimen  of  fulvus  labeled  “Olympia,  Wash”  in  the 
California  Academy  of  Sciences  and  another  one  labeled  “Ohio”  in  the 
Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology.  Since  these  localities  are  considerably 
outside  the  range  of  fulvus  as  now  understood,  and  as  I  am  unable  to 
find  additional  evidence  of  the  occurrence  of  the  species  in  the  two  states, 
these  records  are  here  considered  questionable. 

Anthonomus  fulvus  has  frequently  been  collected  on  Callirrhoe  invol- 
ucrata  in  Texas.  According  to  Pierce  (1907:  268)  “The  adults  feed  on  the 
floral  column  [of  Callirrhoe  involucrata].  The  egg  is  laid  in  the  flower  bud 
and  the  larva  develops  at  the  expense  of  the  floral  column,  finally  eating 
its  way  into  the  capsule  and  pupating,  or  if  the  flower  has  been  sealed 


12 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


properly  and  prevented  from  opening,  pupation  may  take  place  in  the 
fallen  corolla.”  Several  specimens  in  the  U.S.  National  Museum  from  San 
Antonio,  Texas,  bear  label  data  indicating  they  were  reared  from  Callirrhoe 
digitata. 


Figures  7-15,  Anthonomus  spp.  (7-10  drawn  to  same  scale;  11-15  greatly  en¬ 
larged.) 

Figures  7-10,  Male  median  lobe,  dorsal  view.  7 — A.  fulvus.  8 — A.  peninsularis. 
9 — A.  cognatus.  10 — A.  texanus. 

Figures  11-13,  Lateral  view  of  left  mesocoxa,  trochanter,  and  base  of  femur.  11 — 
A.  texanus,  male.  12 — A.  texanus,  female.  13 — A.  fulvus,  male. 

Figures  14-15,  A.  fulvus,  outer  aspect  of  metatibia.  14 — Male.  15 — Female. 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


13 


Adults  of  this  weevil  have  been  collected  from  early  April  until  the 
middle  of  July,  with  most  of  the  available  collection  records  being  in 
April.  Mitchell  and  Pierce  (1911:54)  found  larvae  in  buds  of  C.  involucrata 
as  early  as  March  4  in  Victoria  County,  Texas. 

The  pupa  of  fulvus  was  illustrated  by  Pierce  (1907:299);  the  larva 
has  not  yet  been  described. 


Anthonomus  peninsularis  Dietz 
(Figs.  3,  5,  8,  16) 

Anthonomus  peninsularis  Dietz,  1891,  p.  195;  Gilbert,  1953,  p.  41. 
Anthonomus  pervilis  Dietz,  1891,  p.  196. 

This  species  may  be  readily  separated  from  other  Anthonomorphus  by 
having  the  prothorax  smaller  in  comparison  to  the  size  of  the  elytra  (fig.  3), 
and  by  the  more  nearly  erect  pubescence  of  the  body.  Peninsularis  is  most 
likely  to  be  confused  with  cognatus;  in  fact,  representatives  of  the  two 
species  were  mixed  in  some  collections  I  examined.  These  two  species  are 
quite  different  and  may  be  readily  separated  by  characters  given  in  the 
accompanying  key.  Additional  differences  are  presented  under  the  discus¬ 
sion  of  the  relationships  of  cognatus. 

Gilbert  (1953:41)  synonymized  pervilis  with  peninsularis,  attributing 
the  differences  described  by  Dietz  to  sexual  dimorphism  involving  the 
degree  of  convexity  of  the  eyes  and  the  color  of  the  body.  After  examining 
the  types  of  peninsularis  and  pervilis  (both  in  the  Ulke  Collection  at  the 
Carnegie  Museum),  I  agree  that  this  synonymy  is  warranted.  However, 
the  differences  between  these  two  specimens  are  due  to  normal  intraspecific 
variation  rather  than  sexual  dimorphism.  The  types  of  both  peninsularis 
and  pervilis  are  males;  Dietz  considered  the  pervilis  type  to  be  a  female  and 
was  apparently  followed  in  this  erroneous  assumption  by  Gilbert.  Sexual 
dimorphism  in  peninsularis  is  most  noticeably  exhibited  in  the  mesotrochan- 
ters  and  apical  armature  of  the  metatibae.  Members  of  this  species  do  vary 
considerably  in  color,  the  body  being  usually  black  or  ferrugineus  with 
occasional  intergrades,  but  this  variation  in  color  occurs  about  equally  in 
both  sexes.  Gilbert  (loc.  cit.)  states  that  the  eyes  of  males  of  peninsularis 
are  larger  and  more  strongly  convex  than  those  of  females.  I  have  been 
unable  to  find  any  consistent  differences  in  the  size  and  degree  of  convexity 
of  the  eyes  of  the  two  sexes.  The  eyes  of  females  of  this  species  are  often 
as  prominent,  and  sometimes  more  prominent  than  those  of  males. 

In  addition  to  the  type  of  peninsularis,  I  have  examined  170  specimens 
from  the  following  localities:  ARIZONA — PIMA  CO.:  Molino  Basin,  Mt. 
Lemmon;  Sabino  Canon,  Catalina  Mts.  YAVAPAI  CO.:  Jerome.  CAL¬ 
IFORNIA — INYO  CO.:  Argus  Mts.;  4  mi.  E.  Bigpine;  Bishop;  Cave 
Springs;  Inyo  Mts.;  Keeler  to  Darwin  Road;  Lone  Pine;  Olancha;  Owens 
Lake;  Owens  Valley;  Panamint  Mts.;  Suprise  Canyon,  Panamint  Mts.; 
Westgard  Pass  Plateau.  RIVERSIDE  CO.:  Palm  Springs;  Pinon  Flat, 
San  Jacinto  Mts.  SAN  DIEGO  CO.  (no  other  locality  data).  NEVADA  — 
ESMERALDA  CO.:  Goldfield.  LYON  CO.:  Yerington. 


14 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


Dietz  states  that  the  type  of  peninsularis  came  from  “Lower  California; 
exact  locality  not  given.1  This  specimen  in  the  Ulke  Collection  is  labelled 
only  “Cal.” 

According  to  label  data,  peninsularis  has  been  collected  on  Sphaeralcea 
ambigua,  Malacothamnus  orbiculatus,  and  Encelia  jarinosa  in  California, 
and  Riddellia  cooperi  in  Arizona.  Sphaeralcea  ambigua  is  the  most  fre¬ 
quently  listed  plant  on  labels  of  material  I  have  examined,  but  additional 
evidence  is  needed  to  determine  whether  or  not  it  is  a  true  host  of 
peninsularis.  This  weevil  has  been  collected  in  April,  May,  and  June. 


Figure  16 — Geographic  distribution  of  species  of  the  subgenus  Anthonomorphus. 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


15 


Anthonomus  texanus  Dietz 
(Figs.  2,  10-12,  16) 

Anthonomus  texanus  Dietz,  1891,  p.  197;  Champion,  1903,  p.  187; 

Pierce,  1908,  p.  174. 

Anthonomus  texanus  most  closely  resembles  cognatus  from  which  it  is 
easily  separated  by  the  key  characters.  Specimens  of  texanus  vary  consider¬ 
ably  in  size,  but  are  usually  smaller  and  the  body  is  narrower  than  that  of 
other  members  of  the  subgenus.  The  median  lobe  of  the  male  genitalia  is 
stouter  and  the  sides  are  only  slightly  narrowed  toward  the  apex. 

The  male  type  from  Texas  in  the  Dietz  collection  in  the  Museum  of 
Comparative  Zoology  has  been  examined.  In  addition,  I  have  seen  70 
specimens  from  the  following  localities:  United  States — ARIZONA 
(State  label  only).  NEW  MEXICO — DONA  ANA  CO.:  Las  Cruces. 
/ EXAS — BREWSTER  CO.:  Chisos  Mts.;  Marathon;  “Rio  Grande.”  EL 
PASO  CO.:  El  Paso.  HUDSPETH  CO.:  Indian  Hot  Springs.  PECOS  CO.: 
3.6  mi.  N.  Bakersfield.  PRESIDIO  CO.:  Presidio;  Ruidosa.  VAL  VERDE 
CO.:  Devil’s  River.  Mexico— A GUASCALIENTES—FzbQUon.  CHI¬ 
HUAHUA — Guadalupe;  6  mi.  WSW  Jimenez;  Ojinaga.  GUANAJUATO 
— Tupataro;  9  mi.  S.  San  Luis  de  la  Paz.  HIDALGO — Langunillo.  MEX¬ 
ICO — Santa  Clara;  Teotichuacan. 

Pierce  (1908:174)  reported  rearing  a  specimen  of  texanus  from  a  bud 
of  Sphaeralcea  angustifolia  in  Texas.  Label  data  of  specimens  examined 
indicate  texanus  has  been  collected  on  Sphaeralcea  angustifolia,  S.  ambigua 
and  S.  emori-variabilis  in  Texas,  and  on  S.  fenderli  in  New  Mexico.  This 
weevil  has  been  collected  on  plants  from  April  through  September  and  in 
ground  trash  around  cotton  fields  in  January  and  February. 


Anthonomus  cognatus  Burke,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  4,  6,  9,  16) 

Holotype  male:  Body-length,  4.85  mm.  Rostrum-length,  2.04  mm.  Prothorax-length, 
1.26  mm.;  width,  1.63  mm.  Elytra-length,  3.70  mm.;  width,  2.37  mm. 

Oblong-oval;  body  black,  rostrum  and  legs  reddish  brown,  scape,  basal  segments  of 
funicle  and  tarsi  slightly  paler  in  color;  pubescence  coarse,  gray,  uniformly  distributed, 
semierect  on  dorsal  surface,  recumbent  on  abdomen  and  underside  of  thorax. 

Rostrum  slightly,  evenly  curved,  feebly  wider  near  apex;  distinctly  tricarinate  from 
base  to  point  opposite  antennal  attachments,  carinae  minutely  punctate;  apical  por¬ 
tion  shining,  bearing  small,  oval,  scattered  punctures.  Antennae  attached  slightly  be¬ 
fore  middle  of  rostrum;  scape  slender,  feebly  curved,  rather  suddenly  enlarged  on 
apical  fifth;  first  funicular  segment  slender  and  as  long  as  2  +  3,  segment  2  as  long 
as  3  +  4,  remaining  segments  about  equal  in  length,  segment  7  distinctly  broader, 
each  segment  bearing  a  whorl  of  inclining  white  setae  which  taper  to  fine  points, 
setae  becoming  progressively  longer  toward  club;  club  as  long  as  preceding  four 
funicular  segments  combined.  Eyes  strongly  convex,  nearly  round,  separated  on  front 
by  distance  equal  to  length  of  first  funicular  segment  of  antenna.  Head  with  sides 
converging  to  a  rather  distinct  constriction  behind  eyes;  front  rugosely  punctate, 
striate  between  eyes;  vertex  finely  punctate,  bearing  a  few  scattered  coarse  hairs; 
fovea  deep,  round.  Prothorax  with  sides  subparallel  in  basal  two-thirds  thence  con¬ 
verging  into  a  fairly  distinct  subapical  constriction;  disc  rather  densely  covered  with 
small,  deep  punctures,  each  of  which  has  a  slender  scale-like  hair  arising  from  its 


16 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


posterior  margin,  raised  areas  between  punctures  smooth.  Scutellum  with  sides  sub¬ 
parallel,  posterior  margin  broadly  rounded.  Elytra  wider  than  prothorax  at  base; 
humeri  moderately  rounded;  sides  diverging  slightly  from  behind  humeri  to  about 
middle,  thence  rather  evenly  rounded  to  apices;  intervals  nearly  flat  on  disc  of  elytra 
except  at  base  where  they  are  slightly  more  convex;  striae  deeply  impressed  through¬ 
out.  Abdomen  with  first  sternite  depressed  in  middle;  suture  between  stermtes  1  and  2 
indistinct,  especially  in  middle.  Legs  slender;  femora  rather  strongly  clavate;  tarsi 
slender. 

Female  allotype  (body-length,  5.33  mm.;  width,  2.44  mm.)  differs  from  holotype 
in  having  a  slightly  straighter  rostrum,  antennae  attached  just  behind  middle  of 
rostrum,  and  first  abdominal  sternite  flattened  in  middle.  Elytra  and  prothorax  of 
allotype  dark  reddish  brown  whereas  those  of  holotype  are  black,  but  this  is  an 
individual  rather  than  sexual  difference.  Vestiture  on  head  and  rostrum  (these  areas 
rubbed  in  holotype)  consists  of  semierect  pubescence  on  and  immediately  above 
interocular  area,  and  finer  pubescence  in  striae  on  basal  half  of  rostrum. 

Paratypes  agree  well  with  holotype  and  allotype  except  for  some  slight  size 
(for  size  range  see  measurements  in  key)  and  color  differences.  Vestiture  of  a  few 
paratypes  is  more  noticeably  dense  than  in  others  due  to  their  being  in  a  better 
state  of  preservation.  Vestiture  of  members  of  this  species  is  very  easily  abraded  by 
rubbing. 

Anthonomus  cognatus  most  closely  resembles  texanus;  the  several  diff¬ 
erences  between  these  two  species  are  given  in  the  key  and  under  the  dis¬ 
cussion  of  texanus.  Since  cognatus  might  also  be  confused  with  peninsularis, 
it  should  be  noted  that  in  addition  to  the  characters  used  in  the  key,  females 
of  the  two  may  be  separated  by  the  almost  straight  rostrum  of  cognatus  as 
compared  with  the  distinctly  curved  one  of  peninsularis  ( cf .  figs.  5  and  6). 
The  antennal  club  of  cognatus  is  never  longer  than  the  preceding  four 
funicular  segments  combined  while  that  of  peninsularis  is  always  longer 
than  these  segments. 

The  only  reference  to  a  plant  on  the  label  data  of  members  of  the  type 
series  of  cognatus  is  that  accompanying  five  specimens  from  22  miles  west 
of  Patterson,  Calif.,  each  of  which  is  labeled  “on  Salix.”  Since  it  is  either 
definitely  known  or  strongly  indicated  that  malavaceous  plants  are  hosts  of 
other  members  of  the  subgenus,  the  willow  referred  to  on  these  labels  was 
possibly  serving  only  as  a  resting  site. 

Holotype  male,  Potwisha,  Sequoia  Natl.  Park,  California,  V-9-1931, 
Van  Dyke  Collection,  alt.  3000-5000  ft.;  Allotype  female,  same  data  except 
collected  V-19-1920  and  alt.  2000-5000  ft.;  and  60  paratypes  as  follows: 
6  $  $  ,  8  2  $  ,  same  data  on  holotype;  2  5$,  same  data  as  allotype;  \2  $  S  , 
12$  $,  Potwisha,  Sequoia  Natl.  Park,  Calif.,  V-20-30,  alt.  2000-5000, 
Van  Dyke  Collection;  1  $  ,  Potwisha,  Sequoia  Natl.  Park,  V-19-30,  2000- 
3000  ft.,  A.  T.  McClay;  4  $  <5,3$  $  ,  Sequoia  Natl.  Park,  Calif.,  V-9-31, 
A.  T.  McClay,  2  $  $  ,  2  $  $  ,  Sequoia  Natl.  Park,  Calif.,  VI-9- 1931,  A.  T. 
McClay;  2  $  $  ,  Lebec,  Calif.,  alt.  4000  ft.,  V-15-1928,  J.  O.  Martin; 
1  $  ,  8  mi.  N.  Lake  of  the  Woods,  Kern  Co.,  Calif.  VII- 15-61,  5200  ft., 
C.  W.  O’Brien;  4  $  $  ,  1  $  ,  Adobe  Creek  22  mi.  W.  Patterson,  Calif., 
Stanislaus  Co.,  IV-23-49,  Hugh  B.  Leech,  on  Salix. 

The  holotype  and  allotype  of  cognatus  are  deposited  in  the  California 
Academy  of  Sciences;  paratypes  are  deposited  there  and  in  the  collections 
of  California  Department  of  Agriculture,  University  of  Kansas,  Texas 
A  &  M  University,  and  C.  W.  O’Brien. 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


17 


Literature  Cited 


Champion,  G.  C.  . 

1902-1906  (1903).  Rhynchophora,  Curculionidae,  Curculionmae  (part).  Biologia 
Centrali-Americana,  Insecta,  Coleoptera,  IV(4):750  pp. 

Dietz,  W.  G. 

1891.  Revision  of  the  genera  and  species  of  Anthonomini  inhabiting  North 
America.  Trans.  American  Ent.  Soc.,  18:177-276. 

Gilbert,  E.  E. 

1953.  Sexual  dimorphism  and  synonymy  in  Anthonomus  (Anthonomorphus) 
(Coleoptera:  Curculionidae).  Pan-Pacific  Ent.  29(1):41. 

Hustache,  A. 

1929.  Curculionides  de  la  Guadeloupe.  Faune  des  Colonies  Frangaises  3:165- 
267. 

LeConte,  J.  L. 

1858.  Description  of  new  species  of  Coleoptera,  chiefly  collected  by  the  United 
States  and  Mexican  Boundary  Commission,  under  Major  W.  H.  Emory, 
U.S.A.  Proc.  Acad.  Nat.  Sci.  Philadelphia,  pp.  59-89. 

LeConte,  J.  L.  (asst,  by  G.  H.  Horn). 

1876.  The  Rhynchophora  of  America  north  of  Mexico.  Proc.  American  Philos. 
Soc.  15(96),  455  pp. 

Mitchell,  J.  D.,  and  W.  D.  Pierce 

1911.  The  Weevils  of  Victoria  County,  Texas.  Proc.  Ent.  Soc.  Washington 
13:45-62. 

Pierce,  W.  D. 

1907.  On  the  biologies  of  the  Rhynchophora.  Ann.  Rept.  of  Nebraska  St.  Bd. 
of  Agric.  pp.  249-319. 

1908.  Descriptions  of  new  curculionid  beetles  of  the  tribe  Anthonomini.  Proc. 
United  States  Nat.  Mus.  34:173-181. 

Schenkling,  S.,  and  G.  A.  K.  Marshall 

1934.  Curculionidae:  Anthonominae,  In  Junk,  W.,  Coleopterorum  Catalogus, 
Berlin,  Pars  139:1-82. 

Voss,  E. 

1944.  Anthonominen-Studien  (Col.,  Cure.).  Stettiner  Ent.  Zeitung  105:34-51. 


APION  LONGIROSTRE  OLIVIER,  WIDELY  DISTRIBUTED  IN 
NORTH  AMERICA  (COLEOPTERA:  CURCULIONIDAE) 

Apion  longirostre  Olivier  commonly  known  as  the  ‘hollyhock  weevil’  is  a  species 
introduced  from  Europe  and  is  recently  coming  to  attention  in  the  United  States. 
It  breeds  in  the  seeds  of  hollyhock  and  is  becoming  widely  distributed  here.  It  has 
now  been  found  in  the  following  States:  New  York,  Pennsylvania,  Ohio,  Maryland, 
Virginia,  Illinois,  Missouri,  Arkansas,  Kentucky,  Tennessee,  North  Carolina  and 
Wisconsin;  and  in  Canada,  in  Ontario  (Simcoe,  Norfolk  Co.,  and  Chatham).  Ob¬ 
servations  have  indicated  that  A.  longirostre  feeds  only  on  hollyhock,  but  according 
to  Shchegolev,  V.  N.,  Znamenskii,  A.  V.,  and  Bey-Bienko,  G.  J.  (1937,  Insect  Pests 
of  Field  Crops,  Moscow,  2nd  ed.:  486-487)  it  is  a  pest  of  field  crops  in  U.S.S.R. 
The  name  appears  in  a  list  of  cotton  pests  by  Iyriboz  (1941,  T.  C.  Ziraat  Vekaleti 
Nesriyati  Umum  No.  237  [Turkey],  Mahsul  Hastaliklari  No.  1:80).  For  information 
on  the  life  history  and  habits  of  A.  longirostre  see  Tuttle  (1954,  Ann.  Ent.  Soc. 
America  47(2)  :306)  and  Tattershall  and  Davidson  (1954,  Jour.  Econ.  Ent.  47(1): 
182,  figs.  1,  2). — Rose  Ella  Warner,  Ent.  Res.  Div.,  A.R.S.,  U.  S.  Department  of 
Agriculture,  Washington,  D.  C. 


18 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


TWO  NEW  NAMES  FOR  NORTH  AMERICAN  SPECIES  OF 
SELONODON  (COLEOPTERA:  CEBRIONIDAE) 

By  J.  P.  Macnamara,  S.J.1 

The  preparation  of  a  revision  of  Dalla  Torre’s  world  catalog  of  the 
family  Cebrionidae  reveals  two  primary  homonyms  in  the  new  world  genus 
Selonodon  Latreille,  1834.  In  a  catalog  of  the  type-species  of  the  genera 
of  the  Cebrionidae,  Arnett  (1949)  moved  the  “American  species  of 
‘Cebrio’  ( Cebrio  of  recent  American  authors  and  Anachilus  LeConte)”  to 
Selonodon  Latreille.  Those  generic  changes  have  temporarily  obscured 
these  two  homonyms. 

Selonodon  josephi  Macnamara,  NEW  NAME 

In  1916  Schaeffer  described  Cebrio  antennatus  from  Arizona  which 
became  a  primary  homonym  of  Cebrio  antennatus  Chevrolat,  1874,  from 
Greece.  This  species  is  renamed  Selonodon  josephi. 

Selonodon  josephi  Macnamara,  NEW  NAME 

Cebrio  antennatus  Schaeffer,  1916  (not  Chevrolat,  1874),  Bull. 
Brooklyn  Ent.  Soc.  11:107. 

Selonodon  arizonensis  Macnamara,  NEW  NAME 

Another  Arizona  cebrionid,  Cebrio  pallidipennis  Van  Dyke,  1949,  is  a 
primary  homonym  of  Cebrio  pallidipennis  Chevrolat,  1874.  Van  Dyke’s 
C.  pallidipennis  is  here  referred  to  Selonodon  Latreille,  1934,  according  to 
Arnett’s  1949  paper  which  appeared  prior  to  Van  Dyke’s  description.  This 
species  is  renamed  Selonodon  arizonensis. 

Selonodon  arizonensis  Macnamara,  NEW  NAME 

Cebrio  pallidipennis  Van  Dyke,  1949  (not  Chevrolat,  1874),  Pan- 
Pacific  Ent.  25:52. 

The  present  composition  of  the  genus  Selonodon  is  as  follows.  The  generic 
changes  listed  here  should  be  credited  to  Arnett,  1949,  with  the  exception 
of  Selonodon  arizonensis  Macnamara. 

Selonodon  Latreille,  1834 

Selonodon  Latreille,  1834.  Ann.  Soc.  Ent.  France  3:136.  (Type-species: 
Selonodon  bicolor  (Fabricius,  1801).  Monobasic.) 

Boscia  Leach,  1824.  (not  Leach,  1814,  Schweigger,  1819,  or  Ferussac, 
1822)  Zool.  Jour.  1:37.  (Type-species:  Boscia  picea  Leach,  1824. 
Designated  by  Arnett,  1949,  p.  53.) 

Anachilus  LeConte,  1861.  Smithsonian  Misc.  Coll.  3:175.  (Type-species: 
Anachilus  mandibularis  LeConte,  1863.  By  being  the  first  included 
species,  by  LeConte,  1863,  Smithsonian  Misc.  Coll.  6:86.) 


1  Department  of  Biology,  Catholic  University  of  America,  Washington,  D.  C. 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


19 


Selonodon  abnormis  (Werner,  1943). 

Cebrio  abnormis  Werner,  1943. 

Selonodon  arizonensis  Macnamara,  NEW  NAME. 

Cebrio  p  alii  dip  enni  s  \  an  Dyke,  1949  (not  Chevrolat,  1874). 

Selonodon  atokanus  (Werner,  1943). 

Cebrio  atokanus  Werner,  1943. 

Selonodon  bicolor  (Fabricius,  1801). 

Cebrio  bicolor  Fabricius,  1801. 

Boscia  picea  Leach,  1824. 

Cebrio  picea  (Leach,  1824). 

Selonodon  brusei  (Werner,  1943). 

Cebrio  brusei  Werner,  1943. 

Selonodon  compositus  (Fall,  1907). 

Cebrio  compositus  Fall,  1907. 

Selonodon  confusus  (LeConte,  1853). 

Cebrio  confusus  LeConte,  1853. 

Selonodon  convexifrons  (Knull,  1935). 

Cebrio  convexifrons  Knull,  1935. 

Selonodon  emarginatus  (Schaeffer,  1916). 

Cebrio  emarginatus  Schaeffer,  1916. 

Selonodon  estriatus  (Horn,  1881). 

Cebrio  estriatus  Horn,  1881. 

Selonodon  glaber  (Leach,  1824). 

Boscia  glabra  Leach,  1824. 

Cebrio  glaber  (Leach,  1824). 

Selonodon  josephi  Macnamara,  NEW  NAME. 

Selonodon  antennatus  (Schaeffer,  1916). 

Cebrio  antennatus  Schaeffer,  1916  (not  Chevrolat,  1874). 

Selonodon  knause  (Van  Dyke,  1932). 

Cebrio  knause  Van  Dyke,  1932. 

Selonodon  mandibularis  (LeConte,  1863). 

Anachilus  mandibularis  LeConte,  1863. 

Cebrio  mandibularis  (LeConte,  1863). 

Selonodon  minutus  (Leach,  1824). 

Boscia  minuta  Leach,  1824. 

Cebrio  minutus  (Leach,  1824). 

Selonodon  olivaceus  (Leach,  1824). 

Boscia  olivacea  Leach,  1824. 

Cebrio  olivaceus  (Leach,  1824). 

Selonodon  punctatus  (Leach,  1824). 

Boscia  punctata  Leach,  1824. 

Cebrio  punctatus  (Leach,  1824). 

Selonodon  simplex  (LeConte,  1853). 

Cebrio  simplex  LeConte,  1853. 

Selonodon  speratus  (Fall,  1928). 

Cebrio  speratus  Fall,  1928. 


20 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


Literature  Cited 


Arnett,  R.  H.,  Jr. 

1949.  Notes  on  the  genera  included  in  the  family  Cebrionidae  (Coleoptera). 
Coleopt.  Bull  3:49-54. 

Chevrolat,  L.  A.  A. 

1874.  Revision  des  Cebrionides.  Ann.  Soc.  Ent.  France  (ser.  5),  4:9-38;  363-426; 
507-540. 

Dalla  Torre,  K.  W. 

1911.  Cebrionidae.  Coleoptorum  Catalogus,  pars  25:1-18. 

Schaeffer,  C. 

1916.  Two  new  species  of  Cebrio.  Bull.  Brooklyn  Ent.  Soc.  11:107-108. 

Van  Dyke,  E.  C. 

1949.  New  species  of  American  Coleoptera.  Pan-Pacific  Ent.  25:49-56. 


CURRENT  RESEARCH  PROGRAMS 

These  announcements  of  research  underway  on  beetles  are  not  meant  to  be  requests 

for  specimens  or  information  unless  stated  to  the  contrary;  a  letter  to  the  researcher 

will  determine  whether  or  not  specimens  or  information  are  wanted.  All  research 

workers  are  invited  to  send  notices  of  research  in  progress  to  the  Editor. 

CERAMBYCIDAE:  Revision  of  Moneilema.  By  Arthur  G.  Raske,  Dept,  of  Ento¬ 
mology  and  Parasitology,  Univ.  of  California,  Berkeley,  Calif. 

CURCULIONIDAE:  Study  of  cocooning  and  diapausing  in  Hypera  postica.  By  Sara 
S.  Rosenthal,  Dept,  of  Entomology  and  Parasitology,  Univ.  of  California,  Berkeley, 
Calif. 

CURCULIONIDAE:  Revision  of  Dorytomus.  By  Charles  W.  O’Brien,  Dept,  of 
Entomology  and  Parasitology,  Univ.  of  California,  Berkeley,  Calif. 

DERMESTIDAE:  Taxonomy  of  Attagenus.  By  Richard  S.  Beal,  Jr.,  Arizona  State 
College,  Flagstaff,  Ariz. 

NITIDULIDAE:  Review  of  Stelidota  Erichson.  By  W.  A.  Connell,  Univ.  of  Dela¬ 
ware,  Newark,  Dela.  (Need  specimens  from  Gulf  States  and  southwestern  United 
States  and  from  Central  and  South  America.) 

SCAPHIDIIDAE:  Revision  of  Baeocera.  By  Jim  F.  Cornell,  Dept,  of  Entomology, 
North  Carolina  State  College,  Raleigh,  N.  C. 

SCOLYTIDAE:  Morphology  of  stridulating  organ  in  lps.  By  Barbara  A.  Barr,  Dept, 
of  Entomology  and  Parasitology,  Univ.  of  California,  Berkeley,  Calif. 

SCOLYTIDAE:  Host  selection  behavior  of  bark  beetles.  By  David  L.  Wood,  Dept, 
of  Entomology  and  Parasitology,  Univ.  of  California,  Berkeley,  Calif. 

SCOLYTIDAE:  Biology  of  Conophthorus  lambertianae.  By  William  D.  Bedard, 
U.  S.  Forest  Service,  Pacific  Southwest  Forest  and  Range  Experiment  Station, 
Berkeley,  Calif. 

SCOLYTIDAE:  Efficiency  of  woodpeckers  as  predators  on  western  pine  beetle.  By 
Imre  S.  Otvos,  Dept,  of  Entomology  and  Parasitology,  Univ.  of  California, 
Berkeley,  Calif. 

STAPHYLINIDAE:  Review  of  the  Nearctic  Staphylinidae  exclusive  of  the  Steninae 
and  Aleocharininae.  By  Ian  Moore,  547  El  Monte  Road,  El  Cajon,  Calif. 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


21 


A  REVIEW  OF  THE  SPECIFIC  NAMES  IN 
NORTH  AMERICAN  MIARUS 
(COLEOPTERA:  CURCULIONIDAE) 

By  D.  M.  Anderson1 

During  a  study  of  the  immature  stages  of  the  North  American  species 
of  the  genera  Miarus,  Mecinus,  and  Gymnaetron  (tribe  Mecinini),  it  be¬ 
came  evident  that  the  status  of  most  of  the  names  proposed  for  North 
American  species  of  Miarus  was  rather  uncertain.  Therefore,  a  study  of 
the  type  specimens,  and  other  material  mentioned  by  the  authors  of  those 
names,  was  undertaken.  The  synonymy  proposed  as  a  result  of  this  study 
is  presented  below,  with  a  discussion  of  each  name  following  in  subsequent 
paragraphs.  Unless  otherwise  indicated,  all  specimens  mentioned  are  located 
in  the  collection  of  the  U.  S.  National  Museum  and  have  been  examined 
by  the  writer. 

Miarus  Schoenherr,  1826 

The  original  author  of  the  name  Miarus  apparently  is  Schoenherr  (1826, 
p.  320),  as  indicated  by  LeConte  (1876),  Pierce  (1919),  and  Neave 
( 1940),  although  Reitter  (1907),  Klima  (1934),  and  more  recent  authors, 
such  as  Franz  (1947)  and  Hoffmann  (1958),  have  recognized  Stephens 
(1831,  p.  15)  as  the  first  author  of  that  name. 

Miarus  hispidulus  LeConte 

Miarus  hispidulus  LeConte,  1876,  p.  221.  Lectotype,  here  designated: 
Female,  labeled  “Ill.”;  second  of  four  syntypes  in  J.  L.  LeConte 
collection;  Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology  Type  No.  5225. 

Miarus  hispidulus  Reitter,  1907,  p.  46.  (Described  as  a  new  species  from 
“Andalusien”;  type  series  not  seen.)  Preoccupied  by  Miarus  hispidulus 
LeConte,  1876. 

Miarus  hispidus  Bovie,  1909,  p.  17.  (New  name  for  Miarus  hispidulus 
Reitter,  1907.) 

Miarus  puritanus  Casey,  1910,  pp.  143-144.  Type:  Male,  labeled  “Mass.”; 
U.  S.  National  Museum  Type  No.  36782.  (NEW  SYNONYMY) 

Miarus  consuetus  Casey,  1910,  p.  143.  Lectotype,  here  designated:  Male 
(?),  labeled  “Ks.”;  first  of  two  syntypes  in  T.  L.  Casey  collection; 
U.  S.  National  Museum  Type  No.  36781. 

Miarus  nanus  Casey,  1910,  p.  144.  Type:  Male  (?),  rostrum  entirely 
missing,  labeled  “Mass.”;  U.  S.  National  Museum  Type  No.  36783. 
(NEW  SYNONYMY) 

Miarus  illini  Casey,  1910,  p.  144.  Type:  Female,  labeled  “Ill.,”  pin  also 
bearing  a  white  paper  disc  with  “6/20”  on  it;  U.  S.  National  Museum 
Type  No.  36784.  (NEW  SYNONYMY) 


1  Entomology  Research  Division,  Agric.  Res.  Serv.,  U.  S.  Department  of  Agri¬ 
culture,  Washington,  D.  C. 


22 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


Miarus  micros  (Germar),  1821,  sensu  Pierce,  1919,  p.  36.  [Misidentifica- 
tion] 

Miarus  meridionalis  (Brisout),  1862,  sensu  Pierce,  1919,  p.  36.  [Mis- 
identification] 


Miarus  erebus  Casey 

Miarus  erebus  Casey,  1910,  pp.  142-143.  Lectotype,  here  designated: 
Female,  labeled  Mex.  with  a  solid  bar  over  e  and  x  [from  near  Coloma 
Carcia,  Sierra  Madre  Mts.,  Chihuahua,  elev.  7,300  ft.,  collected  by 
C.  H.  T.  Townsend,  according  to  the  original  description];  first  of 
five  syntypes  in  T.  L.  Casey  collection;  U.  S.  National  Museum  Type 
No.  36780. 


Discussion 

Miarus  hispidulus  Reitter  (renamed  Miarus  hispidus  by  Bovie,  1909) 
was  first  placed  in  synonymy  with  M.  hispidulus  LeConte  by  Pierce  ( 1919) 
without  any  indication  of  the  reasons  for  this  action.  More  recently,  Franz 
(1947),  having  seen  some  specimens  evidently  used  by  Reitter  (1907)  in 
describing  his  Miarus  hispidulus,  decided  that  those  specimens  are  examples 
of  M.  hispidulus  LeConte,  which  were  actually  collected  in  North  America 
but  not  so  labeled  by  the  collector  (G.  Strobl),  and  presented  to  Reitter, 
who  had  mistakenly  thought  that  they  had  originated  in  southern  Spain 
and  that  they  represented  an  undescribed  species. 

Examination  of  the  type  specimens  of  Miarus  puritanus  Casey,  M.  illini 
Casey,  and  M.  nanus  Casey,  all  of  which  were  described  from  single  speci¬ 
mens,  revealed  no  features  that  would  consistently  separate  them  from 
Miarus  hispidulus  LeConte,  as  represented  by  the  lectotype  specimen  and 
by  102  specimens  in  the  National  Museum  collection.  A  survey  of  the 
latter  material,  collected  at  various  localities  from  Michigan  south  to 
Florida,  indicated  that  individual  variation  would  account  for  the  dis¬ 
tinguishing  features  given  by  Casey  (1910)  for  his  M.  puritanus,  M.  nanus, 
and  M.  illini. 

For  reasons  rather  uncertain  to  the  writer,  Leng  (1920)  listed  nanus 
and  illini  as  varieties  of  puritanus,  but  listed  M.  consuetus  Casey  as  a 
variety  of  M.  hispidulus  LeConte.  Klima  (1934)  apparently  followed 
Leng  (1920)  in  listing  M.  illini  as  a  synonym  of  M.  puritanus,  but  his 
reasons  for  placing  M.  nanus  as  a  synonym  of  M.  meridionalis  (Brisout  ) 
are  not  evident  to  the  writer. 

The  two  specimens  from  Kansas,  upon  which  Casey  (1910)  based  his 
Miarus  consuetus,  do  differ  from  most  of  the  Miarus  hispidulus  specimens 
examined  in  having  all-white  vestiture  arranged  in  single  rows  on  most 
of  the  elytral  intervals,  rather  than  a  mixture  of  brown  and  white  (or  pale 
gray)  vestiture  arranged  in  two  or  more  rows  on  each  elytral  interval. 
However,  these  differences  are  not  entirely  consistent.  A  few  specimens 
in  the  National  Museum  collection  from  Kansas  and  Iowa  were  found  to 
agree  in  all  respects  with  the  lectotype  of  M.  consuetus,  but  other  specimens 
from  the  same  area  (particularly  Lake  Okoboji,  Iowa)  were  seen  to  be 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


23 


intermediate  between  them  and  most  other  specimens  of  M .  hispidulus  in 
having  some  brownish  vestiture  on  the  prothorax  and  elytra,  or  in  having 
vestiture  that  is  white  but  arranged  in  more  than  one  row  on  each  elytral 
interval.  No  differences  in  the  genitalia  of  either  sex  or  consistent  differ¬ 
ences  in  other  characters,  such  as  size  and  body  shape,  could  be  found 
between  specimens  agreeing  with  the  lectotype  of  M.  consuetus  and  ex¬ 
amples  conforming  with  the  lectotype  of  M.  hispidulus.  Because  of  the 
lack  of  consistent  differences  between  the  specimens  studied,  M.  consuetus 
and  M.  hispidulus  are  interpreted  here  as  one  species. 

The  two  specimens  from  Winnipeg,  Manitoba,  identified  as  Miarus 
micros  (Germar)  by  Pierce  (1919)  are  also  apparently  representatives  of 
Miarus  hispidulus  LeConte  having  whitish  vestiture.  They  definitely  do 
not  agree  with  European  specimens  identified  as  Miarus  micros  in  the 
National  Museum  collection,  which  have  a  yellowish  decumbent  vestiture, 
nor  do  they  agree  with  Germar’s  (1821)  original  description  of  M.  (then 
Cionus)  micros,  or  with  the  more  recent  description  and  drawings  of  that 
species  by  Hoffmann  (1958). 

The  single  specimen  from  Douglas  Co.,  Kansas,  identified  by  Pierce 
(1919)  as  Miarus  meridionalis  (Brisout)  does,  as  stated  by  Pierce,  agree 
closely  with  the  specimens  described  by  Casey  (1910)  as  Miarus  consuetus, 
and  is  likewise  interpreted  here  as  an  example  of  Miarus  hispidulus  Le¬ 
Conte  having  white  vestiture. 

Miarus  erebus  Casey  is  evidently  a  distinct  species.  The  specimens  in 
the  type  series  are  easily  separated  from  Miarus  hispidulus  LeConte  by  the 
characters  given  in  the  key  by  Casey  (1910),  particularly  by  the  long, 
white,  erect  vestiture  of  the  prothorax  (and  to  some  extent,  the  elytra), 
which  gives  M.  erebus  a  much  more  hirsute  appearance. 

Literature  Cited 

Bovie,  a. 

1909.  Coleoptera,  fam.  Curculionidae:  subfam.  Gymnaetrinae,  Genera  insec- 
torum,  fasc.  92: 1-20,  2  pis. 

Brisout  de  Barneville,  H. 

1862.  Monographic  du  genre  Gymnetron.  Ann.  Soc.  Ent.  France  (Ser.  4) 
2:625-668. 

Casey,  T.  L. 

1910.  On  some  new  species  of  Balanini,  Tychini,  and  related  tribes.  Canadian 
Ent.  42:114-144. 

Franz,  H. 

1947.  Beitriige  zur  Curculioniden-systematik  I.  Revision  der  europaischen  Arten 
der  Gattung  Miarus  Steph.  Ann.  Natnrhist.  Mus.  Wien  55:210-249. 

I  Germar.  E.  F. 

1821.  Genera  quaedam  Curculionitum  proposita,  et  speciebus  observatis  illu- 
strata.  Mag.  Ent.  4:309. 

Hoffmann,  A. 

1958.  Coleopteres  Curculionides  (troisieme  partie).  Faune  de  France,  vol.  62, 
1839  pp.,  illus. 


24 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


Klima,  A. 

1934.  Curculionidae:  Gymnetrinae,  Nanophyinae.  Coleopterorum  catalogus, 
pars  135:1-94. 

LeConte,  J.  L. 

1876.  In  LeConte  and  Horn,  The  Rhynchophora  of  America  North  of  Mexico. 
Proc.  American  Philos.  Soc.  15:vii-xvi,  1-469. 

Leng,  C.  W. 

1920.  Catalogue  of  the  Coleoptera  of  America,  North  of  Mexico.  J.  D.  Sherman, 
Mount  Vernon,  N.  Y.,  470  pp. 

Neave,  S.  A. 

1940.  Nomenclator  zoologicus  3:1-1065. 

Pierce,  W.  D. 

1919.  Contributions  to  our  knowledge  of  the  weevils  of  the  superfamily  Cur- 
culionoidea.  Proc.  Ent.  Soc.  Washington  21  (2):21-36. 

Reitter,  E. 

1907.  Bestimmungs-T abellen  fur  die  Curculionidengruppe  der  Mecinini  (Gym- 
netrini)  aus  Europa  und  den  angrenzenden  Landern.  Verh.  Naturf.  Ver. 
Brunn  55:43-49. 

SCHOENHERR,  C.  J. 

1826.  Curculionidum  disposito  methodica  .  .  .  ,  partem  4.  Lipsiae.  x  -f-  338  pp. 
Stephens,  J.  F. 

1831.  Illustrations  of  British  entomology  .  .  .  Mandibulata,  4:1-366,  pis.  20-23. 


- 


BEETLE  TALK 

Under  this  department,  Beetle  Talk,  we  solicit  your  opinions,  ideas,  news,  ques¬ 
tions,  answers,  impressions,  challenges,  complaints,  announcements,  etc.,  or  just 
about  anything  of  an  informal  nature.  Perhaps  one  of  our  readers  has  the  answer 
to  some  of  the  questions  now  vexing  you.  Here,  under  Beetle  Talk,  you  can  put 
those  questions  to  quite  a  few  coleopterists.  We  solicit  your  beetle  talk. 

It  may  be  wondered  whether  the  “Origin  of  Species’  would  have  been  written 
if  Mr.  Lawson  had  not  existed.  .  .  .  Of  course,  Mr.  Lawson  s  part  in  no  way 
diminishes  Darwin’s  achievement,  for  it  was  not  so  much  the  fact  of  geographical 
variation,  as  its  interpretation,  that  required  genius.  Nevertheless,  credit  should  be 
given,  as  Darwin  gave  it,  to  Mr.  Lawson,  who  must  have  been  a  naturalist  of 
perspicacity  and  accuracy.  Herein  lies  the  moral,  for  perhaps  one  of  us  will  un¬ 
knowingly  provide,  perhaps  has  already  provided  without  knowing  it,  a  key  fact  for 
the  Darwin  of  the  next  generation. — David  Lack,  American  Scientist  51:13,  1963. 

The  spread  of  education  adds  to  the  writer’s  burdens  by  multiplying  that  pestilent 
fellow  the  critical  reader.  No  longer  can  we  depend  on  an  audience  that  will  be 
satisfied  with  catching  the  general  drift  and  obvious  intention  of  a  sentence  and  not 
trouble  itself  to  pick  holes  in  our  wording;  the  words  used  must  nowadays  actually 
yield  on  scrutiny  the  desired  sense;  to  plead  that  anyone  could  see  what  you  meant, 
or  so  to  write  as  to  need  that  plea,  is  not  now  permissible — H.  W.  Fowler,  A  Dic¬ 
tionary  of  Modern  English  Usage,  1937,  p.  256. 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


25 


ON  THE  SUPPOSED  NORTH  AMERICAN  TRACHODINAE 
(COLEOPTERA:  CURCULIONIDAE) 

By  Elwood  C.  Zimmerman1 

While  working  on  a  problem  concerning  Indo-Pacific  weevils,  I  have  had 
to  stLidy  the  “Trachodinae”  of  the  world,  and  I  have  found  that  the  species 
assigned  to  this  subfamily  in  America  do  not  belong  to  it.  Instead  of  having 
the  results  of  my  study  of  the  North  American  species  immersed  entirely 
in  my  Pacific  monographs,  I  have  thought  it  best  to  present  these  few  notes 
where  they  will  be  easily  available  to  North  American  students. 

This  work  was  accomplished  during  the  tenure  of  National  Science 
Foundation  research  grant  G- 18933,  “Pacific  Island  Weevil  Studies,”  for 
which  1  am  most  grateful.  I  am  also  indebted  to  Rose  Ella  Warner  Spilman 
who  assisted  me  in  this  study  at  the  United  States  National  Museum,  and 
for  arranging  for  the  loan  of  specimens  from  that  institution,  and  to  the 
Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology,  Harvard  University,  for  use  of  their 
excellent  library  and  for  permission  to  study  the  great  collections  of 
LeConte  and  Fall. 

LeConte  (1876:190)  erected  the  “Tribe  Trachodini”  for  the  genus 
Trachodes  Germar,  and  in  it  he  placed  the  following  three  species: 
Trachodes  ptinoides  Germar,  1824,  Trachodes  quadrituberculatus  (Mot- 
schulsky,  1845)  Mannerheim,  1852,  and  Trachodes  horridus  Mannerheim, 
1852.  Unhappily,  none  of  these  species  belongs  to  Trachodes.  Thus,  the 
characters  upon  which  LeConte  based  his  “Trachodini”  do  not  agree  with 
the  type  genus,  Trachodes. 

The  three  species  named  above  were  listed  in  Trachodes  by  G.  R.  Crotch 
in  his  “Check  List  of  the  Coleoptera  of  America  North  of  Mexico,”  1873, 
and  repeated  in  E.  P.  Austin’s  “Supplement”  to  that  work  in  1880.  In 
1885,  the  three  species  again  were  catalogued  similarly  by  Samuel  Henshaw 
in  his  “List  of  the  Coleoptera  of  America,  North  of  Mexico.”  None  of  these 
references  listed  localities  or  gave  bibliographic  notes,  but  that  information 
was  then  to  be  found  in  the  Gemminger  and  Harold  “Catalogus  Coleop- 
terorum,”  1871,  where  the  species  are  also  listed  under  Trachodes.  After 
a  lapse  of  35  years  from  the  publishing  of  Henshaw’s  catalogue,  the  “Leng 
Catalogue”  appeared  in  1920,  and  there  we  find  ptinoides  and  quadrituber- 
culatus  under  Trachodes  and  horridus  under  “Aparapion.”  These  are  placed 
in  the  “Trachodini”  which  is  situated  between  the  “Erirhinini”  and  the 
“Tychini.”  Various  errors  were  made  in  these  listings.  The  “Trachodini” 
are  not  allied  to  the  groups  between  which  they  were  placed;  Trachodes 
quadrituberculatus  is  credited  to  Mannerheim  instead  of  to  Motschulsky, 
and  “Aparapion"  is  a  misspelling  for  Aparopion.  No  authority  for  the 
transfer  of  horridus  to  Aparopion  was  given,  but  it  was  Heyden,  1879: 167. 

In  1936,  L.  L.  Buchanan,  a  devoted  and  excellent  worker,  wrote  a  paper 
entitled  “Systematic  Notes  on  the  Trachodinae.”  Buchanan  demonstrated 
that  none  of  the  species  we  are  concerned  with  belongs  to  Trachodes 


1  Peterborough,  New  Hampshire. 


26 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


(whose  type  was  designated  by  Schoenherr  in  1826  as  the  European 
hispidus  Linnaeus).  Buchanan  resurrected  Sthereus  Motschulsky,  1845 
(which  incorrectly  had  been  synonymized  with  Trachodes  by  Lacordaire, 
who  had  not  seen  specimens  of  the  genus),  for  quadrituberculatus  Mot¬ 
schulsky  (which  Buchanan  designated  type  of  Sthereus),  ptinoides  (Germar) 
and  a  new  species,  multitub erculatus  Buchanan.  Buchanan  created  a  new 
genus,  Lobosoma,  for  Trachodes  horridus  Mannerheim,  and  he  also  erected 
a  new  allied  genus,  Gastrotaphrus,  for  barberi,  a  new  species.  Peculiarly, 
Buchanan  did  not  describe  his  Lobosoma,  although  he  gave  a  lengthy  de¬ 
scription  of  Gastrotaphrus.  He  said  of  Lobosoma  only:  “LOBOSOMA, 
new  genus.  (Aparopion  of  American  lists,  not  Hampe.)  ”.  Unfortunately, 
the  results  of  Buchanan’s  studies  were  not  included  in  Schenkling  and 
Marshall’s  “Coleopterorum  Catalogus,”  pars  154,  Trachodinae,  1937. 

Further  confusion  exists  in  literature  because  of  some  errors  made  by 
Sir  Guy  Marshall.  In  1932:344,  Sir  Guy  referred  Sthereus  and  Trachodes 
to  the  Trachodinae.  (Bedel,  1884:92,  footnote,  had  earlier  stated  that 
“Stereus”  [Vc]  belonged  to  the  “Trachodini,”  and  he  gave  characters  to 
separate  it  from  Aparopion  with  which  some  authors  had  merged  it.)  The 
Marshall  usage  was  followed  by  Schenkling  and  Marshall  in  1937,  in 
“Coleopterorum  Catalogus,”  pars  154,  Trachodinae,  but  there  the  con¬ 
fusion  is  compounded  further,  because  Sthereus  is  erroneously  placed  as  a 
synonym  of  Trachodes.  In  1948:427,  Marshall  continued  to  be  confused 
by  considering  Sthereus  to  be  a  synonym  of  Trachodes  and  incorrectly 
believing  the  type  of  Trachodes  to  be  ptinoides.  He  noted  then  that 
ptinoides  is  a  hylobiid,  and  he  erected  a  new  genus,  Metrachodes,  for 
hispidus  (Linnaeus)  and  other  species  which  he  assigned  to  the  Acic¬ 
nemidinae.  Evidently,  he  discovered  his  errors  when  his  paper  was  in  page 
proof,  because  there  is  a  footnote  beneath  his  description  of  Metrachodes 
stating,  correctly,  that  the  type  of  Trachodes  is  hispidus,  and  therefore  his 
“ Metrachodes  falls  as  a  synonym  of  Trachodes [Morimoto  has  failed  to 
note  this  synonymy,  and  he  uses  Metrachodes  incorrectly  for  Trachodes 
subfasciatus  Voss,  in  his  recent  “Preliminary  Check  List  of  the  Families 
Curculionidae  (II)  and  Rhynchophoridae  of  Japan,”  of  1962.] 

The  original  purpose  of  this  paper  was  to  demonstrate  that  not  only  do 
none  of  the  American  species  discussed  belong  to  Trachodes,  but  none  of 
them  belong  to  the  “Trachodinae.”  They  are  all  flightless  Hylobiinae. 
Hence,  the  subfamily  “Trachodinae”  should  be  deleted  from  the  American 
faunal  lists,  and  the  included  species  should  be  transferred  to  the  Hylobiinae. 
Moreover,  the  name  Trachodinae  (LeConte,  1876)  is  a  synonym  of 
Acicnemidinae  (Lacordaire,  1866).  In  so  far  as  is  now  known,  the 
Acicnemidinae  are  an  Old  World  group  whose  present  great  proliferation 
of  species  is  in  the  Indo-Pacific  area. 

It  should  be  noted  here,  also,  that  the  genus  Ancylocnemis  Marshall, 
now  listed  in  the  Trachodinae  in  “Coleopterorum  Catalogus,”  should  be 
transferred  to  the  Anthonominae  and  evidently  placed  near  Bradybibastes. 
When  Marshall  described  the  genus,  he  placed  it  in  the  Anthonominae, 
but  in  1932:344,  he  incorrectly  transferred  it  to  the  Trachodinae.  Heller, 
1930:5,  considered  it  to  belong  to  the  Anthonominae.  Although  it  may 
be  shown  eventually  that  Ancylocnemis  is  not  a  typical  member  of  the 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


27 


Anthonominae,  it  is  obvious  that  it  does  not  belong  to  the  Acicnemidinae. 
During  this  study,  1  have  examined  only  Ancylocnemis  sternalis  Marshall. 
It  differs  from  the  Acicnemidinae  in  facies,  it  lacks  postocular  lobes,  it 
lacks  the  peculiar  scaling  along  the  metepisternal  suture  that  is  typical  of 
the  Acicnemidinae,  its  fore  coxae  are  contiguous,  the  eyes  are  more  frontal 
and  the  claws  are  appendiculate.  Ancylocnemis  species  are  known  to 
attack  fruits,  and  this  is  a  habit  characteristic  of  many  Anthonominae  but 
foreign  to  the  Hylobiinae  and  the  Acicnemidinae  whose  larvae  are  char¬ 
acteristically  wood-borers. 

The  geographical  distribution  of  the  flightless  Hylobiinae  now  under 
discussion  is  significant.  They  are  distributed  from  northern  California 
through  Oregon,  Washington,  northwestern  Idaho,  British  Columbia,  Alas¬ 
ka  and  across  the  Aleutian  Islands  to  Kamchatka. 

These  weevils  are  inhabitants  of  forest  ground  litter  and  are  also  found 
in  and  under  driftwood.  Comparatively  few  specimens  have  been  collected, 
and  the  ranges  of  the  species  remain  to  be  determined. 


Key  to  the  North  American  Associates  of  Sthereus 


1.  Anterior  margin  of  prosternum  entire,  not  emarginate;  pronotum  without  a  median 

carina;  length  less  than  3.5  mm. - STHEREUS  Motschulsky 

Anterior  margin  of  prosternum  deeply,  conspicuously  emarginate  (somewhat  re¬ 
sembling  the  formation  found  in  some  Cryptorhynchinae);  pronotum  with  a  narrow 

median  carina;  length  usually  greater  than  3.5  mm. -  2 

2(1).  Metasternum  and  ventrites  one  and  two  with  large,  deep,  extraordinary  excava¬ 
tions  - GASTROTAPHRUS  Buchanan 

Metasternum  and  venter  without  any  excavations -  3 

3(2).  Antennal  club  elongate-ovate,  less  than  one-half  as  broad  as  long,  broadest  near 
distal  one-third;  dorsum  conspicuously  multituberculate;  legs  densey  squamose, 
femora  each  with  a  low,  obtuse  tooth  within  a  cluster  of  setae,  vestiture  of 
coxae  dense  and  conspicuous,  anterior  and  middle  coxae  moderately  densely 
squamose;  metepisternum  almost  completely  indistinguishable;  distance  between 
metacoxae  less  than  median  length  of  metasternum;  first  abdominal  suture  con¬ 
tinued  coarsely  and  conspicuously  across  middle  of  venter - L0B0S0MA  Buchanan 

Antennal  club  stoutly  ovoid,  about  three-fourths  as  broad  as  long,  broadest  at  about 
middle;  dorsum  not  tuberculate;  legs  finely  setose,  femora  not  toothed,  coxae 
appearing  bare  and  shiny  (with  only  a  few  fine  setae);  underside  sparsely  setose; 
metepisternum  distinct  throughout  its  length;  distance  between  metacoxae  greater 
than  median  length  of  metasternum;  first  abdominal  suture  obsolete  across  middle 
of  venter - PHILOSTRATUS  Zimmerman 


It  was  not  my  intention  when  I  began  this  research  to  describe  new 
American  categories,  because  for  nearly  30  years  I  have  confined  my  work 
to  the  faunas  of  the  Pacific  Ocean.  However,  I  have  found  that  the  generic 
name  Sthereus  has  included  two  American  genera.  One  of  these  is  un¬ 
recognized  in  literature  and  requires  description.  Hence,  to  record  more 
fully  the  results  of  my  research,  the  genus  Philostratus  is  described  below. 

The  following  are  the  American  genera  and  species  that  should  be  trans¬ 
ferred  from  the  “Trachodinae”  to  the  Hylobiinae: 


28 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


Genus  Sthereus  Motschulsky 
Motschulsky,  1845:373. 

Lacordaire,  1863:374,  footnote,  there  in  synonymy  under  Trachodes. 
Buchanan,  1936:178. 

Bedel,  1884:92,  footnote.  Stereus  [s/c] 

Type-species:  Sthereus  quadrituberculatus  Motschulsky,  designated  by 
Buchanan,  1936:178. 


Key  to  the  American  Species  of  Sthereus 

1.  Pronotum  without  any  fascicles  of  erect  setae;  tubercles  on  elytra  low  and  poorly 

developed,  most  prominent  on  interval  three  and  obsolescent  or  absent  on  intervals 
five  and  seven;  intervals  three,  five  and  seven  not  or  only  feebly  elevated  be¬ 
tween  the  fascicles  _ QUADRITUBERCULATUS  Motschulsky 

2.  Pronotum  with  four  fascicles  of  erect  setae  on  a  transverse  line  cephalad  of  middle, 

the  two  fascicles  on  the  disc  most  prominent  and  those  at  the  sides  obsolescent 
in  some  examples;  tubercles  on  elytral  intervals  three,  five  and  seven  very 

prominent  and  the  intervals  prominently  elevated  between  the  tubercles - 

_ MULTITUBERCULATUS  Buchanan 

In  addition  to  these  species,  Sthereus  borealis  Motschulsky,  1845:374, 
and  Sthereus  jasciculatus  Motschulsky,  1845:374,  both  from  Kamchatka, 
which  are  presumed  to  belong  to  Sthereus,  but  which  I  have  not  seen, 
should  follow  the  American  species  into  the  Hylobiinae.  It  is  possible,  how¬ 
ever,  that  these  species  belong  to  Philostratus.  LeConte,  1876: 190,  said  that 
he  had  received  from  Col.  Motschulsky,  specimens  of  Sthereus  ptinoides 
under  the  name  Sthereus  jasciculatus,  and  this  statement  might  be  con¬ 
strued  to  mean  that  jasciculatus  is  a  synonym  of  ptinoides  (placed  herein 
under  Philostratus) .  This  has  evidently  led  to  the  incorrect  listing  of  such 
synonymy  in  “Coleopterorum  Catalogus.”  Motschulsky,  1845:374,  said 
that  he  had  been  confused  by  the  two  species,  but  he  noted  that  on 
jasciculatus  the  pronotum  is  “in  medio  caniculato,”  whereas  ptinoides  has 
a  fine  median  carina  on  the  pronotum.  I  have  examined  the  Motschulsky 
specimens  mentioned  by  LeConte  in  his  collection  at  the  Museum  of 
Comparative  Zoology  at  Harvard,  and  they  are  ptinoides  as  we  now 
recognize  it.  Unfortunately,  the  specimens  lack  locality  data. 

Sthereus  multitub erculatus  Buchanan,  1936:179. 

Oregon  (type  locality:  Astoria)  to  Alaska. 

Sthereus  quadrituberculatus  Motschulsky,  1845:375,  pi.  7,  fig.  4,  I-V. 
Buchanan,  1936:178. 

Trachodes  quadrituberculatus  (Motschulsky)  Mannerheim,  1852:355. 
LeConte,  1876:190. 

Northern  California  to  Alaska  (type  locality:  Sitka). 

Mannerheim  (1832:355)  said  that  this  species  had  been  found  on  bark 
and  in  logs  of  pine. 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


29 


Genus  Philostratus  Zimmerman,  NEW  GENUS 

Rather  similar  to  Lobosoma,  but  dorsum  not  tuberculate  and  vestiture 
less  dense,  especially  on  ventral  surfaces  which  are  not  hidden  by  vestiture 
as  they  are  on  Lobosoma. 

Head  with  eyes  moderately  convex,  coarsely  faceted,  the  individual  facets  con¬ 
spicuously  convex;  interocular  distance  fully  as  great  as  greatest  breadth  of  base 
rostrum.  Rostrum  with  several  fine  carinae  behind  antennal  insertions;  mandibles 
tri-dentate,  but  the  basal  tooth  small  and  much  less  conspicuous  than  the  prominent 
middle  and  anterior  teeth;  upper  margin  of  scrobe  directed  to  lower  corner  of  eye; 
without  any  long,  tactile  setae  on  sides  just  behind  bases  of  mandibular  sinuses  or 
on  underside  behind  maxillary  sinuses  and  none  on  prementum.  Antennae  sparsely 
setose,  inserted  just  beyond  middle  of  rostrum;  apex  of  scape  nearly  reaching  eye 
(separated  by  about  one-fourth  the  diameter  of  club  of  scape  from  eye  on  type, 
viewed  from  side);  funiculus  with  first  two  segments  elongate,  first  segment  some¬ 
what  longer  and  much  stouter  than  second,  second  as  long  as  three  plus  four 
combined,  segments  three  to  seven  subspherical;  club  compact,  stout,  ovoid,  about 
three-fourths  as  broad  as  long,  broadest  near  middle,  about  as  long  as  preceding 
four  funicular  segments.  Prothorax  rather  loosely  squamose,  punctate,  finely  granulate; 
dorsum  moderately  uneven,  with  a  fine,  longitudinal,  median  carina  and  a  sulcus 
along  basal  margin;  subapical  constriction  well  developed  on  sides  and  continued 
across  prosternum;  sides  with  moderately  developed  postocular  lobes  which  partly 
cover  the  eyes  when  head  is  retracted,  and  the  inner  edges  of  the  lobes  behind  the 
eyes  armed  with  a  fringe  of  setae  (post-ocular  vibrissae)  which  extend  over  the 
posterior  edges  of  the  eyes  when  head  is  retracted.  Scutellum  concealed.  Elytra  ovate, 
without  humeri,  setose  and  squamose,  ten-striate,  stria  ten  well  impressed  only  basad  of 
metacoxae  and  at  apex  but  marked  by  a  continuous  line  of  punctures  between  these 
areas;  stria  nine  continuous  to  base.  Wings  absent.  Legs  slender;  femora  not  dentate, 
hind  pair  reaching  about  to  apex  of  ventrite  four;  tibiae  slightly  sinuous,  strongly 
uncinate;  tarsi  long  and  slender,  hind  tarsi  more  than  half  as  long  as  tibiae, 
sparsely  setose  dorsally  and  much  less  densely  setose  beneath  than  Lobosoma 
(obviously  not  “spongy”),  third  tarsal  segment  deeply  cleft,  the  sinus  reaching  near 
base  (on  type  the  inner  lobe  is  smaller  than  outer  lobe  on  hind  tarsus).  Sternum 
sparsely,  finely  setose;  coxae  and  trochanters  appearing  mostly  bare,  with  only  a 
few  fine  setae;  anterior  margin  of  prosternum  conspicuously,  broadly,  arcuately 
emarginate  in  front,  the  disc  broadly  and  shallowly  concave;  the  anterior  and 
posterior  intercoxal  processes  well  separated  and  the  coxal  cavities  thus  distinctly 
coalescent;  procoxae  large,  strongly  protuberant;  mesosternum  with  intercoxal  process 
steep,  subtruncate  behind,  the  distance  between  the  mesocoxae  equal  to  one-third 
or  more  of  the  length  of  the  metasternum  at  its  narrowest  point  between  meso- 
and  metacoxae;  division  between  mesepisternum  and  mesepimeron  visible;  mestaster- 
num  with  narrowest  point  between  meso-  and  metacoxae  subequal  to  breadth  of  a 
mesocoxa;  metacoxae  eye-shaped,  obviously  transverse  (less  than  three-fourths  as 
long  as  broad  on  type);  metepisternum  distinct  throughout  its  length,  but  the  suture 
well  defined  only  basad  of  middle.  Venter  with  intercoxal  process  of  first  ventrite 
broadly  arcuate,  its  breadth  between  the  metacoxae  greater  than  median  length  of 
mesosternum;  median  length  of  first  ventrite  subequal  to  lengths  of  ventrites  two  and 
three  combined;  its  narrowest  point  behind  the  metacoxae  one-half  the  median  length; 
suture  between  first  and  second  ventrites  obsolete  on  disc,  well  impressed  laterad, 
the  other  sutures  vertical  and  very  strong;  ventrite  two  as  long  next  to  the  elytra  as 
ventrite  three  plus  about  one-half  of  four;  ventrite  five  subequal  in  length  to  ventrite 
three  plus  four;  thickened  ventral  margin  of  pygidium  visible  beyond  ventrite  five  in 
male. 


Type-species;  Sthereus  ( Trachodes )  ptinoides  (Germar)  Buchanan. 

Philostratus  is  derived  from  the  Greek  character  of  that  name  and  is 
masculine. 


30 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


The  concave  anterior  margin  of  the  prosternum  removes  this  genus  easily 
from  Sthereus  and  associates  it  with  Lobosoma  and  Gastrotaphrus.  Gas- 
trotaphrus  is  easily  distinguished  by  its  unusual  underside  as  well  as  other 
features.  Philostratus  is  much  like  Lobosoma,  but  there  are  numerous 
differences  between  the  two,  and  the  more  obvious  differences  are  sum¬ 
marized  in  the  key.  Lobosoma  has  a  narrower  sternum  with  the  inter- 
coxal  processes  of  the  meso-  and  metasternum  and  first  ventrite  all  narrower 
and  more  accuminate.  The  hind  coxae  are  more  nearly  round  on  Lobosoma 
( only  about  one-fifth  broader  than  long),  but  they  are  obviously  more 
transverse  on  Philostratus. 

Philostratus  ptinoides  (Germar)  Zimmerman,  NEW  COMBINATION. 

Trachodes  Ptinoides  Germar,  1824:327.  Schoenherr,  1836:513. 
Fahraeus,  1843:408.  Mannerheim,  1853:240,  “ Var .  b.”  Le- 
Conte,  1876:190. 

Pissodes  ptinicollis  Sturm,  1826:184,  nomen  nudum. 

Sthereus  ptinoides  (Germar)  Buchanan,  1936:178. 

Northern  California  to  the  Aleutian  Islands,  Alaska  (type  locality: 
Unalaska),  and  Kamchatka  (new  record). 

The  Kamchatka  record  is  based  upon  my  determination  of  two  males 
in  the  U.  S.  National  Museum  which  bear  the  following  data:  Peptropaul- 
ski,  Kamtschatka,  June  and  July,  1882,  L.  Stejneger  collector.  These 
specimens  appear  to  come  within  the  range  of  variability  of  ptinoides,  and 
the  aedeagi  are  similar. 

Mannerheim,  1853:240,  and  Van  Dyke  (1921:166)  say  that  this  weevil 
breeds  in  or  is  found  under  driftwood. 

It  is  possible  that  Sthereus  borealis  Motschulsky  and  Sthereus  fasciculatus 
Motschulsky,  from  Kamchatka,  belong  here.  See  the  discussion  after  the 
key  to  Sthereus,  above. 


Genus  Lobosoma  Buchanan 

Buchanan  1936:180. 

Type-species:  Trachodes  horridus  Mannerheim,  by  original  designation 
and  monotypy. 

Lobosoma  horridum  (Mannerheim)  Buchanan,  1936:180. 

Trachodes  horridus  Mannerheim,  1852:345.  LeConte,  1876:190. 

Schenkling  and  Marshall,  1937:2. 

Aparopion  horridus  (Mannerheim)  Heyden,  1879:167. 

Aparapion  [s/c]  horridus  Mannerheim,  Leng,  1920:320. 

Oregon  to  Alaska  (type  locality:  Sitka). 

W.  W.  Baker,  as  recorded  by  Buchanan  (1936:180),  stated  that  he 
collected  this  weevil  “by  sifting  debris  from  the  forest  floor  or  close  to  the 
edges  of  timber.” 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


31 


Genus  Gastrotaphrus  Buchanan 
Buchanan,  1936:180. 

Type-species:  Gastrotaphrus  barberi  Buchanan,  by  original  designation 
and  monotypy. 

Gastrotaphrus  closely  resembles  Lobosoma,  and  the  dorsum  of  each  is 
conspicuously  multituberculate.  The  conspicuously  foveate  sternum  and 
abdomen  of  Gastrotaphrus  makes  possible  the  easy  separation  of  the  two 
groups,  and  I  have  used  this  feature  as  an  easily  observed  character  in  the 
generic  key.  However,  I  would  not  have  considered  the  foveae  by  them¬ 
selves  as  of  generic  importance,  but  there  are  other  differences  between 
Gastrotaphrus  and  Lobosoma,  and  some  of  the  more  obvious  features  may 
be  assembled  as  follows: 

Club  of  antenna  elongate-ovate;  eyes  about  ten  facets  broad;  all  coxae  conspicuously 
squamose  overall,  internally  and  externally;  femora  with  a  low  tooth  beneath  and 
the  hind  pair  reaching  about  to  apex  of  elytra;  third  tarsal  segment  with  the  distal 

emargination  (as  seen  from  beneath)  extending  basad  of  middle -  LOBOSOMA 

Club  of  antenna  stoutly  ovoid;  eyes  only  about  five  facets  broad;  coxae  with  squamae 
confined  to  a  patch  on  mesal  areas  of  pro-  and  mesocoxae  only,  bare  elsewhere; 
femora  not  toothed,  the  hind  pair  reaching  about  to  middle  of  ventrite  five;  third 
tarsal  segment  (viewed  from  beneath)  with  the  distal  emargination  not  reaching  the 
middle  - . - GASTROTAPHRUS 

Gastrotaphrus  barberi  Buchanan,  1936:181. 

California  (type  locality:  Eureka),  and  probably  also  Oregon,  Wash¬ 
ington  and  British  Columbia. 

It  is  probable  that  this  species  has  been  taken  by  sifting  ground  litter  in 
redwood  forests. 


Literature  Consulted 

Austin,  E.  P. 

1880.  Supplement  to  the  [Crotch]  Check  List  of  the  Coleoptera  of  America, 
North  of  Mexico.  Pp.  1-67.  S.  E.  Cassino,  Boston. 

Bedel,  L. 

1882-1888.  Faune  des  Coleopteres  du  Bassin  de  la  Seine  6:1-442,  pi.  1.  Societe 
Entomologique  de  France. 

Blackwelder,  R.  E. 

1939.  Fourth  Supplement,  1933  to  1938  (inclusive)  to  the  Leng  Catalogue  of 
Coleoptera  of  America,  North  of  Mexico.  Pp.  1-146.  John  D.  Sherman. 
Mount  Vernon,  New  York. 

Buchanan,  L.  L. 

1936.  Systematic  Notes  On  The  Trachodinae.  Proc.  Ent.  Soc.  Washington, 
1935  [1936]  37(9):  178-183.  (Issued  Feb.  4,  1936.) 

Crotch,  G.  R. 

1873.  Check  List  of  the  Coleoptera  of  America,  North  of  Mexico.  Pp  1-136. 
Naturalists’  Agency,  Salem,  Massachusetts. 

Fahraeus,  O.  J. 

1843.  In  Schoenherr,  Genera  et  Species  Curculionidum  .  .  .  7(2):  1-461.  Roret, 
Paris. 

Gemmingf.r,  M.,  and  Baron  von  Harold 

1871.  Catalogus  Coleopterorum  .  .  .  8:2181-2668.  E.  H.  Gummi  (G.  Beck), 
Monachii. 


32 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


Germar,  E.  F.  .  . 

1824.  Coleopterorum  Species  Novae  Aut  Minus  Cogmtae,  Descriptiombus  lllus- 
tratae.  Pp.  i-xxiv,  1-624,  pis.  1,  2,  J.  C.  Hendelii  et  Filii,  Halae. 


Heller,  K.  M. 

1930  Eine  neue  Ancylocnemis  und  Bradybibastes-art.  Entomologische  Blaetter 
26(1)  :5-7. 


Henshaw, 

1885. 


List  of  the  Coleoptera  of  America,  North  of  Mexico.  Pp.  1-161.  American 
Ent.  Soc.,  Philadelphia. 


Heyden  L.  von 

1879.  Synonymische  Bemerkungen.  Deutsche  Entomologische  Zeitschrift  23: 
167-168. 


Lacordaire,  Th. 

1863.  Genera  des  Coleopteres  6:1-637.  Roret,  Pans. 
1866.  The  same,  7:1-620.  Roret,  Paris. 


LeConte,  J.  L.,  and  G.  H.  Horn 

1876.  The  Rhynchophora  of  America  North  of  Mexico.  Proc.  American 
Philosophical  Soc.  15(96)  :i-xvi,  1-455. 

1883.  Classification  of  the  Coleoptera  of  North  America.  Smithsonian  Mis¬ 
cellaneous  Collections  26(507)  :i-xxxviii,  1-567. 


1920.  Catalogue  of  the  Coleoptera  of  America,  North  of  Mexico.  Pp.  i-x,  1-470. 
John  D.  Sherman,  Mount  Vernon,  New  York. 

Mannerheim,  G.  C.  G. 

1845.  Beitrag  zur  Kaefer-Fauna  der  Aleutischen  Inseln,  der  Inseln  Sitka  und 
Neu-Californiens.  Bull.  Soc.  Imp.  Nat.  Moscou  16:117-224  [Curculioni- 
dae]. 

1852.  Zweiter  Nachtrag  zur  Kaefer-Fauna  Der  Nord-Amerikanischen  Laender 
Der  Russischen  Reiches.  Bull.  Soc.  Imp.  Nat.  Moscou  25(2)  :283-387. 

1853.  The  same,  Dritter  Nachtrag.  Bull.  Soc.  Imp.  Nat.  Moscou  26(2)  :95-273. 


Marshall,  G.  A.  K. 

1932.  Notes  on  the  Hylobiinae.  Ann.  Mag.  Nat.  Hist.  (X)9:341-355,  figs.  1-4. 
1948.  Entomological  results  from  the  Swedish  Expedition  1934  to  Burma  and 
British  India — Coleoptera:  Curculionidae.  Novitates  Zoologicae  42(3): 
397-473,  1  map. 

Morimoto,  K. 

1962.  Preliminary  check  list  of  the  families  Curculionidae  (II)  and  Rhyncho- 
phoridae  of  Japan.  Sci.  Bull.  Faculty  Agric.  Kyushu  Univ.  19(3 ) : 34 1-368. 

Motschulsky,  V. 

1845.  Observations  sur  le  Musee  entomologique  de  l’Universite  imperiale  de 
Moscou.  Article  I.  Bull.  Soc.  Imp.  Nat.  Moscou  18(2)  :332-388,  illus. 

Schenkling,  S.,  and  G.  A.  K.  Marshall 

1937.  Trachodinae,  in  Coleopterorum  Catalogus,  pars  154:1-4.  W.  Junk,  ’s- 
Gravenhage. 

SCHOENHERR,  C.  J. 

1826.  Curculionidum  Dispositio  Methodica  .  .  .  pp.  i-x,  1-338.  F.  Fleischer, 
Lipsiae. 

1836.  Genera  et  Species  Curculionidum  .  .  .  3 (2)  :507-858.  Roret,  Paris. 
Sturm,  J. 

1826.  Catalog  Meiner  Insecten-Sammlung,  pp.  i-viii,  1-207.  Nurnberg. 
VanDyke,  E.  C. 

1921.  Coleoptera  From  The  Pribilof  Islands,  Alaska.  Proc.  California  Acad. 
Sci.  (IV)  11(14):  156-166. 


-BACK  ISSUES- 

The  Coleopterists'  Bulletin 


Per 

Single 

Volume 

Issue 

Vol.  3,  1949,  6  issues 

(Nos.  I  &  2  o.p.)  $5.00 

$1.00 

Vol.  4,  1950,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol.  5,  1951,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol.  6,  1952,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol.  7,  1953,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol.  8,  1954,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol.  9,  1955,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol.  10,  1956,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol.  11,  1957,  2  issues 

5.00 

3.00 

Vol.  12,  1958,  1  issue 

5.00 

5.00 

Vol.  13,  1959,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol.  14,  1960,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol.  15,  1961,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol.  16,  1962,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol.  17,  1963,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

(above  prices  Postpaid) 


. ATTENTION  READERS! . 

From  time  to  time  we  receive  requests  from  our  subscribers  who 
wish  to  complete  their  holdings  of  the  Bulletin.  We  would  appre¬ 
ciate  it  if  any  readers  possessing  copies  of  Vol.  3,  No.  1,  with  which 
they  are  willing  to  part,  would  inform  the  Bulletin. 


★ 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS1  BULLETIN 

620  Michigan  Avenue,  N.E. 
Washington  17,  D.  C. 


P republic ation  Announcement 

CURCULIONIDAE  OF  AMERICA  NORTH  OF  MEXICO 

A  key  to  the  genera 

by  D.  G.  KISSINGER,  Atlantic  Union  College 

•  Key  to  42  subfamilies 

•  Keys  to  nearly  400  genera 

•  Up-to-date  through  1963 

•  Principal  characters  illustrated 

•  Six  new  genera  described 

•  Biological  data  summarized 

•  Bibliography  with  600  entries 

Approximately  150  pages,  8^4  by  11  inches,  paperbound,  illustrated. 
Available  July  1.  $7.50  postpaid  if  remittance  accompanies  order. 
20%  off  on  prepublication  orders.  Send  orders  to: 

TAXONOMIC  PUBLICATIONS 
Box  278,  South  Lancaster,  Mass. 


Now  in  its  37th  year  — 

Anthropological  Quarterly 

(formerly  Primitive  Man) 

Issued  January,  April,  July  and  October 

<r*o 

Some  Recent  Contents: 

Grasshoppers  as  Food  in  Buhaya . P.  O.  Mors 

A  Pygmy  Group  Newly  Discovered  in  New  Guinea.  .Martin  Gusinde 

Eskimo  Reindeer  Herding . Robert  T.  Anderson 

Rock  Paintings  of  South  Africa . Abbe  Henri  Breuil 

The  Assinboin  Horse  Medicine  Cult . John  C.  Ewers 

Treatment  of  Disease  in  the  New  Guinea  Highlands 

Louis  J.  Luzbetak 

{Articles  on  Physical  and  Cultural  Anthropology) 

Subscription  Price  $4.00  a  year  Single  Issues  $1.00 

Anthropological  Quarterly 

620  Michigan  Ave.,  N.E.  Washington  17,  D.  C. 


1964 


THE  CATHOLIC  UNIVERSITY  OF  AMERICA  PRESS 


LIBRARY 


WASHINGTON  17,  D.  C. 


101  8URRILL  HALL 


Book  Review . 52,  62 

Current  Research  Programs .  41 

Literature  Notice  .  36 


2) 

7  % 

ALLECULIDAE:  Ocular  index,  by  Campbell  IS^VIarshall 

CARAJBIDAE:  Gehringia  in  Isochaeta?,  by  Bell . 

CURCULIONIDAE:  On  Hyphantus,  by  Vaurie . 

CURCULIONIDAE:  On  Ceutorhynchus  assimilis,  by  Warner 
HYDROPHILID AE:  On  Hemiosus  exilis,  by  Van  Tassell.  . 

OEDEMERIDAE:  On  nomenclature,  by  Arnett . 

STAPHYLINIDAE:  On  Manda,  by  Moore . 

TENEBRIONIDAE:  On  Cryptoglossa,  by  Triplehorn . 


A  Quarterly  Publication  Devoted 
to  the  Study  of  Beetles 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS’  BULLETIN 

Founded  1947  by  Ross  H.  Araett,  Jr. 

The  Coleopterists’  Bulletin  is  published  by  The  Catholic  University  of  America 
Press,  Washington  17,  D.  C.  and  edited  by  T.  J.  Spilman.  It  is  issued  four  times  a  year 
beginning  with  March.  All  business  matters  should  be  addressed  to  The  Coleopterists* 
Bulletin  at  the  Press.  Manuscripts  and  other  editorial  matter  should  be  addressed  to 
the  editor,  U.  S.  National  Museum,  Washington  25,  D.  C. 


Subscriptions:  The  subscription  price  for 
each  annual  volume  of  four  numbers  is 
$5.00  payable  in  advance.  All  sub¬ 
scriptions  begin  with  the  first  issue  of 
the  year  and  those  subscribing  later  in 
the  year  will  receive  the  back  issues  of 
the  volume. 


Back  volumes:  A  stock  of  back  volumes 
is  maintained  and  may  be  purchased  as 
follows:  3  to  date,  $5.00  ea.;  single 
numbers,  $1.25  each;  all  prices  postpaid. 
Missing  numbers:  Issues  lost  in  the  mail 
will  be  supplied  free  of  charge  if  no¬ 
tified  within  three  months  after  mailing. 


Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr.,  Ph.D. 

Department  of  Biology 
Catholic  University  of  America 

O.  L.  Cartwright 

U.  S.  National  Museum 
Washington  25,  D.  C. 

Eugene  J.  Gerberg,  Ph.D. 

Insect  Control  and  Research,  Inc. 
Baltimore,  Md. 


NOTICE  TO 

Manuscripts  will  be  considered  ONLY 
FROM  SUBSCRIBERS.  Authors  should 
consult  STYLE  MANUAL  FOR  BIO¬ 
LOGICAL  JOURNALS,  prepared  by  the 
Committee  on  Form  and  Style  of  the  Con¬ 
ference  of  Biological  Editors,  and  pub¬ 
lished  by  the  American  Institute  of  Bio¬ 
logical  Sciences,  2000  P  Street,  N.W., 
Washington  6,  D.  C.  The  Bulletin  requires 
that  all  manuscripts  be  prepared  according 
to  instructions  in  the  Style  Manual.  Illus¬ 
trations  should  be  sent  mounted,  and 
numbered.  The  manuscript  should  be 
marked  to  indicate  the  location  of  text 
figures  or  the  position  of  full  page  plates. 

Manuscripts  will  be  acknowledged  upon 
receipt.  As  soon  as  possible  thereafter 
the  author  will  be  notified  as  to  accept¬ 
ance  after  review  by  the  Editorial  Board. 
If  the  manuscript  is  accepted,  a  tentative 
date  of  publication  will  be  set.  In  general, 


EDITORIAL  BOARD 

James  A.  Magner,  Ph.D.,  S.T.D. 

Business  Manager  of  the  Bulletin 
Catholic  University  of  America 

Theodore  J.  Spilman 

U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture 
Washington  25,  D.  C. 

Eileen  R.  Van  Tassell 

Department  of  Biology 
Catholic  University  of  America 

AUTHORS 

all  papers  will  be  published  in  their  order 
of  receipt,  but  the  editor  reserves  the 
right  to  use  articles  out  of  order  in  the 
interest  of  a  balanced  magazine. 

The  editor  will  make  no  text  changes 
without  advanced  notice  to  the  author. 
Galley  proof  will  be  sent  for  correction. 
These  galleys  are  sent  out  well  in  advanoe 
and  do  NOT  indicate  the  date  or  order 
of  publication. 

Twenty-five  tear  sheets  of  one  page 
notes  will  be  supplied  free  to  the  author  if 
requested  when  returning  galley  proofs. 
Reprints  of  articles  printed  free  of  extrane¬ 
ous  matter  will  be  supplied  with  or  with¬ 
out  covers  at  cost.  Reprints  MUST  be 
ordered  on  the  form  provided  when  re¬ 
turning  galley  proofs.  The  approximate 
cost  of  reprints  will  be  supplied  with  this 
form. 


EDITORIAL  POLICY 

Any  article,  note,  or  news  items  likely  cases ,  descriptions  of  new  species  must  be 
to  be  of  interest  to  readers  of  the  Bulletin  illustrated .  Descriptions  of  new  species  or 
will  be  considered.  Articles  with  illustra-  genera  MUST  contain  keys  or  be  cor- 
tions  are  particularly  desired,  and  in  all  related  with  existing  keys. 


A  QUARTERLY  PUBLICATION  DEVOTED  TO  THE  STUDY  OF  BEETLES 

The  Coleopterists’  Bulletin 


Volume  18 


June  (No.  2) 


1964 


SOME  NOMENCLATURAL  CHANGES  IN 
OEDEMERIDAE  (COLEOPTERA)1 

By  Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr.2 

In  the  course  of  world  studies  of  the  family  Oedemeridae,  including  a 
detailed  cataloging  of  the  literature,  as  well  as  a  study  of  type  specimens, 
a  number  of  nomenclatural  changes  have  become  necessary  and  these 
should  be  recorded  in  the  literature.  These  changes  are  documented  in  this 
paper. 

Acknowledgments — I  wish  to  acknowledge  the  help  of  Mr.  J.  P.  Mac- 
namara.  He  gave  invaluable  aid  in  searching  out  the  literature.  Through 
the  cooperation  of  Dr.  J.  F.  G.  Clarke  of  the  U.  S.  National  Museum,  we 
were  able  to  make  use  of  the  entomology  library.  The  help  of  these  people 
is  gratefully  acknowledged. 

Hypasclera  Kirsch,  1866 

The  type-species  of  the  genus  Hypasclera  is  Hypasclera  schistacea  Kirsch, 
1866.  An  examination  of  the  holotype  specimen  of  this  species  shows  it 
to  be  congeneric  with  Nacerda  dorsalis  Melsheimer,  1846,  the  type  species 
ot  the  genus  Alloxacis  Horn,  1896.  Previous  authors,  including  myself, 
have  considered  H.  schistacea  to  be  congeneric  with  Asclera  cana  LeConte, 
1854,  the  type-species  of  Oxacis  LeConte,  1866;  thus,  Hypasclera  was 
considered  a  junior  synonym  of  Oxacis.  However,  the  two  type-species 
are  clearly  generically  distinct.  Alloxacis  Horn  is  therefore  a  junior  synonym 
of  Hypasclera  Kirsch.  All  of  the  species  now  assigned  to  Alloxacis  must  be 
reassigned  to  Hypasclera.  A  review  of  the  genus  Hypasclera  is  contemplated 
in  a  later  study;  therefore,  a  completed  catalog  of  the  species  will  be  pub¬ 
lished  then.  F 


Oxacis  LeConte,  1866 

Since  the  publication  of  the  previous  paper  in  this  series  ( 1963,  Coleopt. 
Bull.,  17:6-18)  additional  nomenclatural  changes  in  Oxacis  must  be  noted. 
The  following  species  must  be  removed  from  the  genus  as  explained  under 
Hypasclera.  Oxacis  schistacea  (Kirsch,  1866),  the  type-species  of  the 
genus  Hypasclera,  is  therefore  removed  from  the  genus  Oxacis  because  it 
is  not  congeneric  with  the  type-species  of  Oxacis.  The  species  thought  to 


1  Contribution  towards  a  monograph  of  the  Oedemeridae,  no.  20. 

-  Professor  of  Biology,  The  Catholic  University  of  America,  Washington.  D.  C. 


34 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


be  Hypasclera  schistacea  by  Champion  was,  at  the  time  Champion  wrote, 
not  yet  described.  So  far  as  can  be  determined  at  the  present  time  without 
examination  of  the  Pic  holotype,  the  following  name  applies  to  this  species. 

Oxacis  durangosa  Pic 

Oxacis  durangosa  Pic,  1924.  Mel.  Exot.-Ent.  42:20. 

Oxacis  schistacea  Champion,  1890  (not  Kirsch,  1866).  Biol.  Centrali- 
Americana,  Ins.,  Col.  4,  (2):  162. 

The  type  locality  of  O.  durangosa  is  given  as  “Mexico,”  but  we  may 
assume  that  it  is  from  the  Mexican  state  of  Durango.  I  have  not  examined 
the  holotype,  but  if  Pic  has  properly  placed  this  species  in  the  genus 
Oxacis,  then  it  is  very  likely  that  this  name  can  be  used  for  the  species 
Champion  thought  to  be  O.  schistacea  (Kirsch). 

Oxacis  trirossi  Arnett,  NEW  NAME 

Oxacis  championi  Arnett,  1956  (not  Pic,  1927),  Coleopt.  Bull.  10.57. 
Oxacis  cana  var.  £  Arnett,  1956  (not  Champion,  1890).  Coleopt.  Bull. 
10:57. 

It  has  been  discovered  that  Pic  named  Oxacis  cana  var.  championi  in 
1927,  thus  my  1956  name  was  preoccupied.  Pic’s  name  was  in  a  footnote 
and  like  many  other  Pic  names  had  escaped  the  notice  of  all  previous 
catalogers.  (See  under  O.  trimaculata  Champion  for  bibliographic  deails.) 

Oxacis  trimaculata  Champion 

Oxacis  trimaculata  Champion,  1890.  Biol.  Centrali-Americana,  Ins.,  Col. 
4,  (2):  161,  pi.  7,  fig.  20.  (Type  locality:  Pinos  Altos,  Chihuahua, 

Mexico.) 

Oxacis  semicincta  Pic,  1924.  Mel.  Exot.-Ent.  42: 19  (NEW  SYNONYMY). 
(Type  locality:  “Central  America.”) 

Oxacis  cana  var.  a  Champion,  1890.  Biol.  Centrali-Americana,  Ins.,  Col. 
4,  (2):  159,  pi.  7,  fig.  19  (NEW  SYNONYMY).  (Type  locality: 

Atoyac,  Vera  Cruz,  Mexico.) 

Nacerdes  chevrolati  Dejean,  1838,  nom.  nud.,  Champion,  1890.  Biol. 

Centrali-Americana,  Ins.,  Col.  4,  (2):  159 
Oxacis  cana  var.  3  Champion,  1890.  Biol.  Centrali-Americana,  Ins.,  Col. 
4,  (2):  159  (NEW  SYNONYMY).  (Type  locality:  Guanajuato, 

Guanajuato,  Mexico.) 

Oxacis  concolor  Duges,  nom.  nud.,  Champion,  1890.  Biol.  Centrali- 
Americana,  Ins.,  Col.  4,  (2):  160. 

Oxacis  cana  var.  championi  Pic,  1927.  Echange,  43:4,  footnote  (new  name 
for  O.  cana  var.  a  Champion).  (NEW  SYNONYMY.) 

There  is  much  yet  to  be  said  about  this  species  and  the  variable  popu¬ 
lations  assigned  to  this  name.  It  is  hoped  that  the  complex  nomenclature 

is  now  clarified. 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


35 


Oxacis  josephi  Arnett 

Oxacis  josephi  Arnett,  1963.  Coleopt.  Bull.  17:14.  (Type  locality:  15 
km.  E.  Sombrete,  Zacatecas,  Mexico.) 

Oxacis  can  a  var.  p  Champion,  1890.  Biol.  Centrali-Americana,  Ins.,  Col. 
4,  (2):  160  (NEW  SYNONYMY).  (Type  locality:  Durango,  Du¬ 
rango,  Mexico.) 

Oxacis  sericea  Duges,  nom.  nud.  (not  Horn,  1896)  Champion,  1890.  Biol. 
Centrali-Americana,  Ins.,  Col.  4,  (2):  160. 

Oxacis  pilosa  Champion 

Oxacis  pilosa  Champion,  1890.  Biol.  Centrali-Americana,  Ins.,  Col.  4, 
(2):  156,  pi.  7,  fig.  15.  (Type  locality:  San  Jose,  Guatemala.) 

This  species  has  been  reported  by  Blair  (1928.  Ann.  Mag.  Nat.  Hist. 

I  10,  ( 1 ) :  67 3 )  from  James  Island,  Galapagos  Islands.  Blair’s  description 
indicates  that  the  species  he  was  dealing  with  is  not  this  species  but  a 
member  of  the  genus  Oxycopis,  and  therefore  is  not  Oxacis  pilosa  Champion. 

Oxycopis  Arnett,  1951 

The  following  note  applies  to  a  member  of  this  genus.  This  large  genus 
remains  in  need  of  revision.  There  are  still  several  species  to  be  described. 

Oxycopis  florid  ana  (Horn) 

Oxacis  floridana  Horn,  1896.  Proc.  California  Acad.  Sci.,  6:415.  (Type 
locality:  Florida.) 

Oxacis  ( Oxycopis )  luteostriata  Arnett,  1951.  American  Midi.  Nat.  45, 
(2)  :327.  (Type  locality:  Palmetto  Key,  Florida.)  (NEW  SYN¬ 
ONYMY.) 

In  1956  (Coleopt.  Bull.  10:58)  I  pointed  out  that  the  species  I  called 
Oxacis  floridana  Horn  in  my  1951  revision  (American  Midi.  Nat.  45, 
( 2 ) :  3 1 2 )  was  an  undescribed  species  from  Mississippi  which  I  named 
Oxacis  barbara  (Arnett,  1956,  Coleopt.  Bull.  10:58).  At  that  time  I  said 
that  the  status  of  O.  floridana  would  be  discussed  later.  It  is  now  necessary 
to  make  the  correction  as  indicated  in  the  above  bibliography. 

A  recent  reexamination  of  the  Horn  type  in  the  Philadelphia  Academy 
of  Natural  Sciences  has  reconfirmed  the  generic  assignment  of  O.  floridana 
as  stated  in  the  1956  paper,  namely,  that  it  belongs  in  the  genus  Oxycopis 
because  of  the  bifid  mandibles.  Once  this  generic  change  is  made,  it  immedi¬ 
ately  becomes  apparent  that  the  true  Oxacis  floridana  is  the  same  as  my 
Oxacis  luteostriata. 

Horn’s  rather  poor  and  misleading  description  is  a  surprise  to  all  who 
are  aware  of  the  generally  highly  accurate  and  detailed  descriptions  char¬ 
acteristic  of  Horn.  This,  plus  the  fact  that  it  is  impossible  in  the  United 
States  to  compare  holotype  specimens  side  by  side  unless  they  are  in  the 
same  collection,  has  contributed  to  this  unfortunate  confusion  of  de¬ 
scriptions. 


36 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


To  untangle  this  species,  the  following  changes  are  necessary.  My  de¬ 
scription  of  the  supposed  Horn  species,  Oxacis  (Oxacis)  fioridana  in  1951, 
(op.  cit.,  312)  applies  to  Oxacis  barbara  Arnett  with  the  exception  of  the 
Horn  holotype  specimen  mentioned  in  my  redescription.  So  far,  Oxacis 
barbara  is  known  only  from  Mississippi  and  Texas. 

My  description  of  Oxycopis  lutcostriatd^Vci  1951  applies  to  Oxycopis 
fioridana  (Horn).  This  species  is  known  only  from  Miami  south  through 
the  Florida  Keys,  and  in  Bimini.  I  treated  this  species  as  O.  luteostriata 
in  my  1953  paper  on  the  Oedemeridae  of  the  Bimini  Islands  (American 
Mus.  Novitates  no.  1646,  p.  8). 

There  should  be  added  to  the  description  of  this  species  the  following 
note  on  the  holotype.  There  are  three  costae  evident  on  each  elytron  in 
addition  to  the  marginal  and  sutural  costae.  The  basic  number  of  discal 
costae  for  the  species  of  Oxycopis  is  four.  By  numbering  the  costae  with 
number  one  as  proximal  to  the  sutural  costae,  it  appears  that  costa  number 
three  is  missing  from  each  elytron  (number  four  is  usually  referred  to  as 
the  submarginal  costa).  All  of  the  costae  are  covered  by  somewhat  denser 
white  hairs,  giving  the  appearance  of  white  costae. 


LITERATURE  NOTICE 

FOREST  COLEOPTERA  OF  GHANA,  BIOLOGICAL  NOTES  AND  HOST 
TREES.  By  G.  H.  Thompson.  Oxford  Forestry  Memoirs  No.  24,  78  pp.  1963.— 
This  work  discusses  the  habits  of  371  species  of  beetles  in  or  on  the  stems  or  trunks 
of  56  different  kinds  of  trees.  Most  species  of  beetles  have  only  short  statements  of 
their  habits;  some,  however,  are  discussed  at  greater  length.  The  Cerambycidae, 
Curculionidae,  Scolytidae,  and  Platypodidae  predominate.  This  memoir  will  be  wel¬ 
comed  by  students  of  the  biology  of  wood  borers. 


Many  specimens  can  be  damaged  by  a  single  specimen  or  part  of  a  specimen  that 
has  come  loose  in  a  schmitt  box  being  sent  through  the  mails.  A  little  wad  of 
absorbent  cotton  securely  pinned  in  the  corner  of  the  box  will  catch  and  hold  most 
loose  specimens  or  parts. 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


37 


A  NEW  SPECIES  OF  HYPHANTUS,  A  SYNONYM, 
AND  VARIOUS  NOTES  (COLEOPTERA: 
CURCULIONIDAE :  OTIORHYNCHINAE) 

By  Patricia  Vaurie1 

The  35  species  of  the  South  American  otiorhynchid  genus  of  flightless 
weevils  ( Hyphantus  Germar)  are  ant-like  in  appearance,  with  long,  thin 
legs  and  antennae;  short,  stout  beaks;  subocular  vibrissae  but  no  subocular 
lobe;  petiolate,  globose  thorax;  convex,  declivous  elytra,  and  tubercular 
surface.  Males  of  some  species  and  females  of  others  have  marked  sec¬ 
ondary  sexual  characters. 

The  new  species  described  below  is  named  in  honor  of  the  coleopterist, 
Johann  E.  Faust  (1832-1903),  who  wrote  on  the  Curculionidae  of  many 
parts  of  the  world  and  who  evidently  had  intended  to  describe  the  present 
species.  I  am  grateful  to  Dr.  Rolf  Hertel,  of  the  Museum  fur  Tierkunde  in 
Dresden,  for  lending  me  Faust’s  original  specimens  and  for  checking  the 
lact  that  Faust’s  manuscript  name  was  a  nomen  nudum. 

Hyphantus  fausti  Vaurie,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  1-5) 

Holotype,  male,  Blumenau  [Santa  Catarina,  Brasil],  collected  by  Reitter, 
and  a  female  paratype,  with  same  data,  in  collection  of  Staatliches  Museum 
fur  Tierkunde,  Dresden;  a  male  paratype  with  same  data,  and  a  female 
from  “Brasil  in  collection  of  the  American  Museum  of  Natural  History. 

Diagnosis:  Differing  from  other  species  by  having  thorn-like  spine  on 
inner  edge  of  hind  tibiae  in  males,  and  slight  thickening  in  the  same  spot 
in  females,  and  also  by  having  a  projection  in  the  males  on  the  inner 
apical  angle  of  the  hind  tibiae  (figs.  3,  4).  Aside  from  secondary  sexual 
characters,  this  new  species  resembles  hustachei  Vaurie,  minutus  Vaurie, 
and  subminutus  Vaurie,  having  about  the  same  shape,  tuberculation,  and 
vestiture  of  the  pronotum  and  elytra  (figs.  1,  2)  as  those  species;  the  new 
species  also  has  the  same  aedeagus  (fig.  3)  as  does  hustachei. 

Description  of  Holotype,  Male:  Length,  6.5  mm.  Beak,  dorsal  view,  about  twice 
length  of  eye;  feebly  tricarinate;  apical  V-shaped  plaque  distinctly  elevated,  feebly 
concave  within;  surface  rugose;  base  transversely  sulcate;  in  profile  of  same  thickness 
throughout.  Antennae  with  first  segment  of  funicle  scarcely  longer  than  second, 
second  twice  as  long  as  third,  third  slightly  longer  than  each  of  following  segments; 
scrobes  broad,  reaching  vaguely  to  eye.  Eyes  bulbous.  Head  rugose. 

Pronotum  about  as  wide  as  long,  more  than  one-half  of  length  of  elytra,  sides 
strongly  arcuate;  tubercles  convex,  round,  subcontiguous,  approximately  16  to  20 
across  disc  at  its  widest  part;  a  few  fine  hairs,  as  well  as  coarse  setae  of  tubercles. 
Elytra  at  widest  part  wider  than  pronotum,  with  scattered  fine  hairs,  especially  on 
declivity;  sides  subparallel  to  declivity,  thence  convergent  to  rounded-truncate  apex; 
tubercles  on  alternate  rows  larger  than  those  on  pronotum,  widely  separated  longi¬ 
tudinally  by  three  or  four  times  their  diameters;  true  tubercles  lacking  on  other 
rows,  but  front  edge  of  strial  punctures  slightly  tumid;  profile  of  elytra  rather  even¬ 
ly  arcuate  but  slope  of  declivity  steeper  and  longer  than  slope  of  base. 

1  American  Museum  of  Natural  History,  New  York,  N.  Y. 


38 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


Front  femora  bulbous,  minutely  toothed  within  near  apex;  front  tibiae  slightly 
sinuate  within,  incurved  at  apex;  middle  tibiae  straight;  hind  tibiae  near  base  bent 
inward  on  outer  side  and  with  thorn-shaped  tooth  on  inner  side,  inner  apex  also  w  t 
thorn-like  projection.  Abdomen  with  first  *Sfcd  second  segments  separated  by  feebly 
impressed  line,  other  segments  by  wider,  deeper  sulci,  segments  not  notably  bulbous, 
second  segment  longer  than  either  third  or  fourth,  fourth  arcuate  at  sides,  fifth  as 
long  as  three  preceding  segments  combined,  apex  emarginate.  Aedeagus  acuminate 
at  apex,  sides  incised,  dorsal  orifice  long  (fig.  5). 

Variations  from  holotype:  Females  lack  the  spine  and  the  apical  projections  of 
the  hind  tibiae,  but  have  a  slight  sinuation  on  the  inner  side  where  the  spine  of  the 
male  would  be;  females  have  the  elytra  proportionately  wider  and  shorter  than  do 
males.  Some  paratypes  differ  slightly  by  being  smaller  (6  mm.),  by  having  the  rostral 
carinae  or  the  scrobes  of  the  antennae  more  distinct,  by  having  more  hairs  on  the 
pronotum  or  elytra,  or  the  pronotal  tubercles  closer  together. 


Figures  1-5,  Hyphantus  jausti  Vaurie,  new  species.  1  Dorsal  view.  2  Lateral 
vieW.  3— Hind  tibia,  female.  4— Hind  tibia,  male.  5— Aedeagus,  three-quarter  view. 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


39 


Remarks:  This  species  belongs  with  the  seven  species  of  the  argentinensis 
group.  In  my  key  to  the  species  (Vaurie,  1963,  p.  254)  it  could  be  placed 
after  couplet  18;  the  couplet  containing  the  new  species  then  reading: 

Hind  tibiae  of  males  with  thorn-like  spine  on  inner  side,  of  females  with 
feeble  sinuation  in  same  area . fausti 

Hind  tibiae  of  both  sexes  straight . 

Although  this  is  the  only  species  in  which  the  hind  tibiae  are  toothed  in 
males,  the  middle  tibiae  are  toothed  in  males  of  hustachei  Vaurie,  and  the 
front  tibiae  in  males  of  longicauda  Vaurie;  the  hind  femora  are  toothed  in 
males  of  sulcifrons  Boheman  and  simulans  Vaurie. 

New  Synonymy  and  Distribution 

Several  items  of  interest  have  been  found  in  additional  material  received 
after  publication  of  my  revision  of  the  genus.  This  material  includes  about 
230  specimens  from  the  collections  of  the  Departamento  de  Zoologia,  Sab 
Paulo,  and  of  the  Museum  Frey,  Munich,  through  the  courtesy,  respec¬ 
tively,  of  Padre  F.  Pereira  and  Dr.  E.  Haaf,  30  specimens  from  Padre  P. 
Buck,  Colegio  Anchieta,  Rio  Grande  do  Sul,  and  nine  from  the  United 
States  National  Museum,  through  Mrs.  T.  J.  Spilman.  The  species  are 
listed  below.  All  page  numbers  in  parentheses  refer  to  my  revision  (Vaurie 
1963). 

Hyphantus  longicauda  Vaurie  (1963,  p.  295)— Hyphantus  lanceolatus 
Vaurie  (1963,  p.  297).  [NEW  SYNONYMY.]  In  my  revision  (loc.  cit.) 
I  suggested  that  lanceolatus,  of  which  I  had  three  males  (the  type  from 
Rio  de  Janeiro,  one  paratype  from  Sao  Paulo,  one  from  Nova  Petropolis, 
Rio  Grande  do  Sul)  might  prove  to  be  the  male  of  the  unique  type  of 
longicauda  (Sab  Leopoldo,  Rio  Grande  do  Sul).  Two  males  and  two 
females  recently  received  from  Padre  Buck  seem  to  show  that  this  is  so, 
that  there  is  but  one  strongly  dimorphic  species,  in  which  males  have  a 
thorn-like  spine  within  the  front  tibiae,  and  females  have  very  long,  paired, 
tubular  projections  or  “tails”  on  the  sutural  declivity  of  the  elytra.  The  new 
specimens  are  from  the  state  of  Rio  Grande  do  Sul,  a  male  from  the  type 
locality  of  longicauda,  and  a  male  and  two  females  from  Sao  Salvador, 
about  50  kilometers  northwest  of  Sao  Leopoldo.  One  of  the  females  was 
taken  on  April  7,  1960,  the  other  female  and  the  male  on  the  same  date, 
December  7,  1962.  The  locality  of  one  of  the  paratypes  of  “lanceolatus,” 
Nova  Petropolis,  is  in  the  same  vicinity.  All  these  localities  are  not  far 
from  Porto  Alegre. 

The  aedeagus  of  the  two  males  from  Rio  Grande  do  Sul  resembles  the 
aedeagus  illustrated  for  the  paratype  of  “lanceolatus”  from  the  same  state 
(p.  300);  it  is  not  quite  like  that  of  the  type  of  “lanceolatus,”  but  I  be¬ 
lieve  now  that  the  difference  is  explicable  by  individual  variation  and  the 
larger  size  of  the  southern  specimens  from  Rio  Grande  do  Sul. 

Hyphantus  angulatus  Vaurie.  The  type  locality  of  this  species  was  given 
as  Fainhas,  Rio  Grande  do  Sul  (p.  282),  from  notations  by  G.  Bondar, 
but  Padre  P.  Buck,  who  sent  the  specimens  to  Bondar,  writes  me  that  all 
the  insects  given  as  coming  from  this  town  were  actually  collected  at 


40 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


Taimbezinho,  which  is  slightly  to  the  north^Ast  of  Tainhas.  The  locality  of 
two  of  my  paratypes,  which  seemed  to  read  “Jaimbe,  should  be,  accord¬ 
ing  to  Padre  Buck,  Taimbe,  an  abbreviation  of  Taimbezinho.  Two  addi¬ 
tional  males  examined  from  Padre  Buck  s  collection  are  from  Sao 
Francisco  de  Paula,  not  far  from  Taimbezinho. 

Hyphantus  argentinensis  Hustache,  which  I  stated  (p.  290)  was  the  only 
species  not  found  in  Brazil,  does  occur  there,  as  shown  by  25  males  and  one 
female  (in  the  Frey  Museum),  from  Itapera,  Sao  Paulo,  collected  January, 
1959,  by  K.  Hudepohl,  and  by  four  males  and  two  females  from  Osorio, 
Rio  Grande  do  Sul,  January,  1958,  from  Padre  Buck’s  collection. 

Hyphantus  carinatus  Vaurie,  previously  recorded  from  the  state  of  Sao 
Paulo  only,  is  represented  in  the  new  material  by  specimens  from  farther 
south  (Curitiba,  Parana,  and  Rio  Grande  do  Sul  at  Teresopolis  near  Porto 
Alegre).  Although  the  apex  of  the  aedeagus  in  three  of  these  specimens  is 
of  the  characteristic  shape  as  illustrated  by  me  (1963,  fig.  74),  the 
“carinate”  part  behind  the  dorsal  orifice  is  not  carinate,  probably  because 
the  sides  behind  the  orifice  are  spread  open  by  the  intruding  inner  tube, 
thus  obliterating  the  carina. 

Hyphantus  distinguendus  Desbrochers  des  Loges,  of  which  1  had  seen 
specimens  from  the  states  of  Bahia,  Rio  de  Janeiro,  Sao  Paulo,  and  Santa 
Catarina,  is  found  also  in  some  of  the  states  within  this  range:  Minas 
Gerais  (Porto  Alegre),  and  Parana  (Curitiba). 

Hyphantus  hustachei  Vaurie.  A  male  from  the  collection  of  the  United 
States  National  Museum,  taken  in  March,  1935,  by  D.  Cochran,  at 
Lassance,  Minas  Gerais,  extends  the  range  of  the  species  far  to  the  north 
(Lassance  is  about  160  miles  northwest  of  Belo  Horizonte).  Previous 
records  (39  specimens)  are  from  Santa  Catarina  and  Parana  in  southern 
Brazil,  from  Paraguay,  and  northern  Argentina. 

Hyphantus  matronalis  Vaurie,  known  only  from  the  female  type 
paratype  (region  of  Rio  de  Janeiro),  is  represented  by  two  additional 
females  collected  by  Alvarenga,  December,  1956,  at  Floresta  da  Tijuca, 
Rio  de  Janeiro. 

Hyphantus  serpentis  Vaurie,  recorded  by  me  from  the  state  of  Rio  de 
Janeiro  only,  was  collected  by  Hudepohl  at  the  same  locality  and  on 
the  same  date  as  carinatus  (Teresopolis,  Rio  Grande  do  Sul,  March  3, 
1962).  These  specimens  (five  males)  were  dissected,  as  the  aedeagus  is 
the  only  certain  distinguishing  character  between  serpentis  and  carinatus. 

Hyphantus  sulcifrons  Boheman,  one  of  the  most  abundant  species  of  the 
genus,  ranging  from  Uruguay  and  Buenos  Aires  north  to  Parana  in 
southern  Brazil,  is  here  recorded  from  slightly  farther  north,  at  Itapera, 
Sao  Paulo  (four  males  and  five  females,  January,  1959,  collected  by 
Hudepohl) . 


Two  Corrections 

Dr.  E.  Haaf  wrote  to  me  that  the  notations  “G.  Barb.  Frey  on  the 
labels  of  many  specimens  of  Hyphantus  in  the  Frey  Museum,  which  ap- 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


41 


peared  in  my  revision  between  quotation  marks,  refer  to  the  collectors, 
George  Frey  and  Barbara  Frey. 

Mr.  Hans  Reichardt,  who  collected  many  of  the  specimens  of  Hyphantus 
which  1  used  in  the  revisional  study,  writes  me  that  one  of  the  localities 
(Diadema)  that  I  could  not  find  is  a  rather  new  place  near  Sao  Paulo, 
about  10  kilometers  in  the  direction  of  Santos. 


Literature  Cited 

Vaurie,  p. 

1963.  A  revision  of  the  South  American  genus  Hyphantus  (Coleoptera,  Cur- 
culionidae,  Otiorhynchinae).  Bull.  Amer.  Mils.  Nat.  Hist.  125(4)  :241- 
304,  figs.  1-91. 


CURRENT  RESEARCH  PROGRAMS 


These  announcements  of  research  underway  on  beetles  are  not  meant  to  be  re¬ 
quests  for  specimens  or  information  unless  stated  to  the  contrary;  a  letter  to  the 
researcher  will  determine  whether  or  not  specimens  or  information  are  wanted.  All 
research  workers  are  invited  to  send  notices  of  research  in  progress  to  the  Editor. 

AQUATICS:  Study  of  the  water  beetles  of  North  Dakota.  By  Robert  Gordon,  Dept, 
of  Entomology,  North  Dakota  State  Univ.,  Fargo,  N.  D. 

C  HRYSOMEL1DAE:  Natural  history  of  Oulema  melanopa.  By  Thomas  Castro, 
Dept,  of  Entomology,  Michigan  State  Univ.,  East  Lansing,  Mich. 

CURCULIONIDAE:  Study  of  the  weevils  of  North  Dakota.  By  David  Aarhus,  Dept, 
of  Entomology,  North  Dakota  State  Univ.,  Fargo,  N.  D. 

MELOIDAE:  Revision  of  Pyrota  and  allied  genera  and  a  comparative  study  of 
meloid  sexual  behavior.  (Interested  in  obtaining  live  material  for  the  latter  study.) 
By  Richard  B.  Selander,  Dept,  of  Entomology,  Univ.  of  Illinois,  Urbana,  Illinois. 

STAPH  YLINIDAE:  Field  and  taxonomic  studies  of  Euasthetinae  and  Pygostenini. 
By  D.  H.  Kistner,  Chico  State  College,  Chico,  California. 


42 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


THE  OCULAR  INDEX  AND  ITS  APPLICATION  TO 
THE  TAXONOMY  OF  THE  ALLECULIDAE  (COLEOPTERA) 

By  J.  M.  Campbell1  and  James  D.  Marshall2 

The  last  work  of  a  revisionary  nature  on  the  North  American  Alleculidae 
was  a  treatment  of  the  genus  Pseudocistela  Crotch  by  Hopping  (Canadian 
Ent.  1933:65  ( 12)  :28 1-286) .  After  almost  thirty  years  of  neglect,  studies 
have  started  anew  on  this  interesting  group  of  beetles.  Both  authors  of  the 
present  paper  are  currently  involved  in  studies  that  should  lead  to  a 
better  understanding  of  the  North  and  Central  American  components  of 
this  family  of  insects. 

In  many  of  the  earlier  works  on  the  Alleculidae  a  great  amount  of 
emphasis  was  placed  on  the  distance  separating  the  eyes.  Successful  use 
of  the  majority  of  the  older  keys  depends  upon  correctly  interpreting  the 
eyes  to  be  separated  by  a  distance  “greater  than,”  “subequal  to,”  or  “less 
than”  their  own  width.  Such  expressions  of  this  character  have  long  been 
known  to  be  ambiguous  and  not  at  all  dependable.  It  has  been  necessary  to 
resort  to  this  character  again  in  current  revisionary  studies  on  this  group, 
but  an  effort  has  been  made  to  find  a  more  precise  means  of  expressing  it. 
Both  authors  of  this  paper  independently  arrived  at  the  same  solution,  and 
it  was  decided  to  express  this  character  as  the  “Ocular  Index,”  or,  more 
simply,  “OI.” 

The  Ocular  Index  is  calculated  by  measuring  the  minimum  distance 
between  the  eyes  (fig.  1,  B),  and  dividing  this  value  by  the  maximum 
dorsal  width  across  the  eyes  (fig.  1,  A).  The  quotient  resulting  from  this 
division  is  then  converted  into  an  index  by  multiplying  by  100,  i.e., 

Minimum  Distance  Between  Eyes  v  iqq  _  ocuiar  Index 
Maximum  Dorsal  Width  Across  Eyes 

The  use  of  this  index  ( 1 )  permits 
making  a  positive  statement  with 
regard  to  the  distance  separating  the 
eyes,  and  (2)  facilitates  treating  an 
important  key  character  quantita¬ 
tively.  Thus  far  this  character  has 
been  found  to  have  general  applica¬ 
tion  in  the  family  Alleculidae,  and 
studies  of  a  very  preliminary  nature 
indicate  that  it  could  likely  be  used 
effectively  in  the  Lagriidae,  the 
Tentyriinae  of  the  Tenebrionidae, 
and  probably  in  the  Heteromera  in 
general. 


1  Department  of  Biology,  Eastern  Kentucky  State  College,  Richmond,  Kentucky. 

2  Department  of  Entomology,  Cornell  University,  Ithaca,  N.  Y. 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


43 


A  SYNOPSIS  OF  THE  GENUS  CRYPTOGLOSSA  SOLIER 
(COLEOPTERA:  TENEBRIONIDAE) 

By  C.  A.  Triplehorn1 

A  large  number  of  specimens  belonging  to  the  genus  Cryptoglossa  Sober 
have  accumulated  in  collections  since  Blaisdell  (1945)  revised  the  group. 
Many  of  these  were  taken  in  long  series  and  come  from  areas  hitherto 
unreported.  As  a  result  of  this  study,  certain  relationships  within  the  genus 
have  become  clearer,  necessitating  several  nomenclatural  changes. 

T  his  genus  is  composed  of  a  small  number  of  moderately  large  species 
inhabiting  the  arid  portions  of  the  Sonoran  Region  of  southwestern  United 
States  and  adjacent  portions  of  Mexico  and  Baja  California.  They  are 
distinguished  from  the  closely  related  genus  Centrioptera  Mannerheim  by 
the  form  of  the  terminal  antennal  segment.  In  Centrioptera  this  segment 
is  globular  and  as  long  as  or  longer  than  the  penultimate  segment;  in 
Cryptoglossa  it  is  smaller,  truncate  apically  and  partially  retracted  into 
an  excavation  of  the  penultimate  segment  which  greatly  exceeds  it  in  size. 

A  sexual  character  which  has  not  been  reported  previously  was  dis¬ 
covered.  Males  have  tufts  of  long  silken  hairs  on  antennal  segments 
4,  5  and  6  while  females  have  fewer  and  shorter  hairs,  not  forming  tufts, 
on  these  segments.  Neither  male  nor  female  genitalia  was  found  to  be 
uselul  in  distinguishing  between  the  closely  related  taxa  recognized  in  this 
paper. 

This  study  has  been  based  primarily  on  specimens  from  the  following 
institutions:  California  Academy  of  Science  (CAS),  Cornell  University 
(CU),  Florida  State  Collection  of  Arthropods  (FSCA),  Long  Beach  State 
College  (LBSC),  Michigan  State  University  (MSU),  Museum  of  Com¬ 
parative  Zoology  (MCZ),  New  Mexico  State  University  (NMS),  The 
Ohio  State  University  (OSU),  University  of  California  (UCal),  the  United 
States  National  Museum  (USNM)  and  from  my  own  field  work  in  Texas 
sponsored  by  the  American  Philosophical  Society  (Grant  Number  3091, 
Penrose  Fund).  Grateful  acknowledgment  is  made  to  the  various  individuals 
in  charge  of  the  above  collections. 

Catalog  of  Known  Species  of  Cryptoglossa- 

Cryptoglossa  Sober,  1836,  p.  680  (type:  C.  bicostata  Sober,  by  monotypy). 

Asbolus  LeConte,  1851,  p.  129  (type:  A.  verrucosus  LeConte,  NEW 
DESIGNATION). 

1.  bicostata  Sober,  1836,  p.  681,  pi.  24,  figs.  11-13. 

2a.  verrucosa  verrucosa  (LeConte),  1851,  p.  129.  (Asbolus). 

2b.  verrucosa  carinulata  Blaisdell,  1945,  p.  25. 


1  Department  of  Zoology  and  Entomology,  The  Ohio  State  University,  Columbus, 
Ohio. 

Blaisdell  (1945)  published  complete  literature  citations  to  the  above  taxa;  for  the 
sake  of  brevity,  they  are  not  repeated  here. 


44 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


3a. 

3b. 

4a. 

4b. 

5. 


i. 


2. 

3. 

4. 


5. 


6. 

7. 


laevis  laevis  (LeConte),  1851,  p.  130.  (Asbolus). 

laevis  subsimilis  Casey,  1924,  p.  308.  [NEW  SYNONYMY.] 

laevis  papillosa  NEW  SUBSPECIES. 
mexicana  mexicana  Champion,  1884,  p.  73,  pi.  3,  fig.  21. 
mexicana  granulifera  Champion,  1892,  p.  508.  [NEW  COMBINA¬ 
TION  &  STATUS.] 

angularis  (Horn),  1894,  p.  414,  pi.  7,  fig.  4.  (Centrioptera) 


Key  to  the  Known  Species  and  Subspecies  of  Cryptoglossa. 

Fifth  elytral  interval  forming  an  unbroken  costa  from  base  to  one-third  the  distance 

from  apex;  other  intervals  with  conical  tubercles - BICOSTATA 

Fifth  elytral  interval  never  costate  but  may  have  series  of  disconnected  elongate 

costules  - 

Disc  of  pronotum  gibbous - 

Pronotum  depressed,  evenly  convex  from  side  to  side - 

Elytral  intervals  strongly  verrucose  or  cariniform;  pronotum  densely,  granulately 

punctured,  somewhat  pruinose - 

Elytra  smooth  or  minutely  granulate;  pronotum  finely,  inconspicuously  punctate - 

Sculpture  of  elytral  intervals  consisting  of  coarse,  distinctly  separated  conical 

tubercles _ VERRUCOSA  VERRUCOSA 

Sculpture  of  elytral  intervals  consisting  of  finer,  more  or  less  continuous  carinae 

medially;  laterally  broken  up  into  smaller,  isolated,  elongate  carinules - 

_ _ _ VERRUCOSA  CARINULATA 

Elytra  with  punctures  simple,  except  laterally  with  an  incomplete  row  of  large 

conical  or  coarsely  granulate  tubercles;  dorsal  luster  shining - LAEVIS  LAEVIS 

Elytra  with  punctures  distinctly  granulate,  more  coarsely  so  laterally;  dorsal  luster 

duM  _ LAEVIS  PAPILLOSA 

Elytra  with  outer  elytral  intervals  strongly  tuberculate;  all  intervals  convex--- ANGULARIS 

Elytra  smooth  and  indistinctly  striate;  punctation  diffuse;  intervals  flat - 

Elytral  punctures  simple - MEXICANA  MEXICANA 

Elytral  punctures  granulate  or  muricate - MEXICANA  GRANULIFERA 


Phylogenetic  Relationships 

There  are  presumably  two  basic  lines  of  evolution  in  the  genus  Crypto¬ 
glossa,  both  clearly  delimited  by  the  form  of  the  prothorax.  In  the  mexicana 
group,  the  pronotum  is  relatively  flattened  with  the  sides  deplanate  and 
the  lateral  margins  clearly  visible  throughout  their  length  in  dorsal  aspect. 
Further  evolution  has  apparently  taken  place  from  the  smooth  and  simply 
punctured  mexicana  Champion  through  a  gradually  more  muricate  or 
granulate  type  of  puncture  (granulifera  Champion)  to  the  strongly  sculp¬ 
tured  angularis  Horn.  Series  of  specimens  may  be  arranged  which  illustrate 
this  transition  very  nicely. 

In  the  laevis  group,  the  disc  of  the  pronotum  is  always  strongly  gibbous 
with  the  sides  abruptly  arising  from  the  lateral  margin  so  that  the  marginal 
bead  is  somewhat  concealed  in  dorsal  aspect.  Evolution  in  this  group 
parallels  that  of  the  previous  one  in  that  there  is  a  progression  from  a 
simple  through  a  granular  type  of  elytral  punctation  to  a  muricate  type. 

The  presumed  relationships  are  presented  on  Plate  2,  Figure  1.  The  main 
branches  1  and  1/  indicate  the  relatively  flattened  versus  the  gibbous  form 
of  the  pronotum.  2  and  2'  are  the  verrucose  versus  the  smooth  elytral  sculp¬ 
ture.  3  and  3'  represent  sulcate  as  opposed  to  flattened  elytral  intervals. 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


45 


The  remaining  relationships  indicated  are  not  as  sharply  defined  as  those 
of  the  main  branches.  The  use  of  the  trinomials  in  three  of  the  species  does 
not  necessarily  reflect  the  same  degree  of  relationship  to  the  nominate  sub¬ 
species  in  each  case.  In  all  probability,  the  three  are  but  extreme  forms  of 
their  respective  species.  In  fact,  the  trend  from  simple  to  granulate  puncta- 
tion  (mexicana  to  grcmulifera  and  laevis  to  papillosa )  and  tuberculate  to 
carinate  elytral  intervals  (verrucosa  to  carinulata)  is  gradual  in  all  three  and 
occasional  specimens  cannot  be  placed  in  either  subspecies  with  certainty. 
Nevertheless,  this  variation  appears  to  be  geographic  in  nature  and  hence 
worthy  of  trinomial  designation.  It  is  interesting  to  note  the  repetition  of 
the  same  pattern  of  variation  in  the  two  main  lines  of  evolution. 

The  transition  from  mexicana  through  granulifera  to  angularis  is  not 
difficult  to  visualize.  Perhaps  with  further  collecting,  the  last  will  prove  to 

be  only  a  subspecies.  At  present,  existing  cabinet  material  indicates  a 
distinct  species. 

Cryptoglossa  bicostata  Solier  is  omitted  from  this  discussion  and  from 
the  phylogenetic  chart  because  of  the  uncertainty  of  its  identity. 


PAPILLOSA 


Figure  1 — Probable  evolution  in  Cryptoglossa. 


Descriptions  and  Distributions 
Cryptoglossa  bicostata  Solier 


This  species  was  described  from  a  single  mutilated  specimen  from 
Mexico.  As  far  as  is  known,  no  other  specimen  has  been  found  so  that 
the  positive  identification  of  the  species,  and,  for  that  matter,  the  genus,  is 
still  in  doubt.  The  antennae  were  missing  from  the  type  when  the  species 
was  described;  these  structures  are  necessary  to  separate  Cryptoglossa  from 
the  closely  related  genus  Centrioptera.  It  is  quite  possible  that  the  specimen 
described  and  figured  by  Solier  belongs  to  Centrioptera  but  that  problem 
will  not  be  solved  in  this  paper.  His  figure  shows  an  insect  strongly  re¬ 
sembling  Centrioptera  spiculifera  LeConte  but  which  also  looks  like 
Cryptoglossa  angularis  Horn.  The  strongly  carinate  fifth  elytral  interval  is 
unique  however,  and  it  seems  best  to  defer  any  decisions  at  the  generic 
level  until  such  time  as  the  identity  of  this  species  is  established. 


Volume  18 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Cryptoglossa  verrucosa  verrucosa  (LeConte) 

(Figs.  2,  7) 

A  common  and  moderately  large,  opaque  and  more  or  less  pruinose 
species.  The  elytra  have  nine  series  of  rather  large  and  subacute  tubercles 
(Blaisdell,  1943,  p.  223).  The  greatest  variation  observable  in  this 
nominate  subspecies  is  in  the  form  of  the  conspicuous  elytral  tubercles. 
Typically,  these  are  rather  bluntly  conical  and  distinctly  separated  from 
one  another.  In  some  specimens  there  is  a  tendency  toward  reduction  in 
height  and  fusion  at  the  base  of  these  tubercles  to  form  a  series  of  acute 
costae,  particularly  pronounced  in  those  nearest  the  elytral  suture.  Inten¬ 
sive  collecting  would  perhaps  demonstrate  a  gradient  in  the  form  elytral 
sculpture  from  the  typical  “verrucose”  to  the  “carinulate”  type  of  the 
subspecies  carinulata  (see  remarks  below). 

Blaisdell  (1945,  p.  24)  records  this  subspecies  from  numerous  localities 
in  southern  California,  Arizona  and  Nevada.  He  did  not  list  any  records 
from  Mexico  in  his  1945  paper  but  earlier  (1943,  p.  223)  cited  Horns 
(1894,  p.  348)  record  from  San  Jose  del  Cabo,  Baja  California.  I  have 
not  seen  any  specimens  from  that  far  south  and  consequently  this  record 
does  not  appear  on  the  distribution  map. 


Figure  2 _ Cryptoglossa  distribution.  Figure  3 — Cryptoglossa  distribution. 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


47 


From  outside  the  range  of  this  subspecies  as  listed  by  Blaisdell  (1945, 
p.  24),  I  can  add  the  following  records:  UNITED  STATES:  Arizona:  ( 1 ) 
Globe,  June  30,  D.  K.  Duncan  (CU);  (1)  Santa  Rita  Mts.  (CU);  Cal¬ 
ifornia:  (1)  Inyo  Co.,  Shoshone,  April  5,  1928.  T.  Craig  (CAS):  (1) 
San  Bernadino  Co.,  Trona,  May-June,  1925,  MacDonald  (CU);  (1) 
Kern  Co.,  Mojave,  December  12,  1917,  J.  C.  Bradley  (CU);  (1)  San 
Diego  Co.,  Painted  Canyon,  May  25,  1941,  D.  J.  &  J.  N.  Knull  (OSU); 
MEXICO:  Sonora:  (90)  Desemboque,  July  17-September  10,  1953,  B. 
Malkin  (CAS);  (3)  Estero  de  Sargente,  25  km.  south  of  Desemboque, 
August  11,  1953,  B.  Malkin  (CAS);  (6)  Cholla  Bay,  February  5,  1960, 
E.  Kirschbaum  (CAS);  (3)  25  mi.  south  of  San  Luis,  June  4-5,  1949, 
J.  R.  Slevin  (CAS);  (1)  Punta  Penasco,  May  8,  1946,  J.  R.  Slevin  (CAS); 
Baja  California :  (1)  5  mi.  northwest  of  Punta  San  Felipe,  June  9,  1955, 
J.  R.  Slevin  (CAS);  (2)  3  mi.  north  of  San  Felipe,  May  21,  1957,  J.  R. 
Slevin  (CAS);  (1)  Laguna  Salada,  May  17,  1958,  E.  L.  Sleeper  (LBSC); 
(4)  Mexicali,  April  2  (CU). 

Cryptoglossa  verrucosa  carinulata  Blaisdell 

(Figs.  2,  8) 

This  appears  to  be  a  fairly  well-defined  and  rather  disjunctive  geographic 
race,  worthy  of  a  name.  Here  the  tubercles  of  the  elytral  intervals  are 
fused  and  elongated  to  form  more  or  less  continuous  low  carinae  on  the 
disc  of  the  elytra.  Laterally  the  tubercles  are  distinctly  separated  but  still 
retain  the  elongate,  narrowly  costate  form. 

In  a  large  series  of  typical  verrucosa,  the  tendency  for  the  tubercles  to 
fuse  and  form  low  costae  is  occasionally  seen  in  scattered  individuals  from 
southern  California.  Those  from  Arizona  and  Mexico  almost  invariably 
have  the  subacute  tubercles.  The  present  subspecies  is  known  from  the 
area  of  Death  Valley,  Inyo  County,  California,  and  from  St.  George,  in 
extreme  southwestern  Utah.  Four  specimens  (CU)  from  the  latter  area 
uniformly  correspond  more  closely  to  carinulata  than  to  the  nominate 
subspecies. 

Cryptoglossa  laevis  laevis  (LeConte) 

(Figs.  3,  9) 

This  is  a  moderately  large,  shining  black,  smooth  species  with  at  least 
a  row  of  rather  strongly  muricate  punctures  just  above  the  lateral  margins 
at  the  base  of  the  elytra.  These  punctures  become  progressively  smaller  and 
are  not  continued  to  the  elytral  apex.  In  form  laevis  resembles  verrucosa, 
particularly  in  the  shape  and  convexity  of  the  pronotum.  It  occurs  within 
the  range  of  verrucosa,  having  been  taken  in  extreme  southern  California 
(Imperial  and  San  Diego  Counties),  at  Yuma,  Arizona,  and  in  the  adja¬ 
cent  portions  of  Mexico  (Los  Medanos  and  Laguna  Salada  in  Baja  Cal¬ 
ifornia,  and  25  miles  south  of  San  Luis  in  Sonora).  Blaisdell  ( 1945)  failed 
to  mention  any  Mexican  records. 

The  subspecies  subsimilis  Casey  (1924)  is  not  worthy  of  separation.  A 
series  of  31  specimens  taken  at  Los  Medanos,  [Baja]  California,  May  22- 
24,  1951  by  J.  R.  Slevin  (CAS)  demonstrates  that  the  characters  men- 


48 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


tioned  by  Casey  are  merely  normal  variations  within  the  species.  The  rela¬ 
tive  length  of  legs  and  body  proportions  to  which  he  alluded  in  his  two 
specimens  are  apparently  sexual.  The  legs  are  slightly  longer  and  body 
narrower  in  the  male  but  even  these  characters  are  subject  to  variation.  As 
Blaisdell  (1945,  p.  27)  points  out,  there  is  even  some  confusion  as  to 
which  of  the  two  forms  Casey’s  description  applies  but  he  considered  it 
“best  to  give  Col.  Casey  the  benefit  of  the  doubt  as  it  is  merely  a  sub¬ 
species.”  There  is  actually  no  justification  for  this. 

Occasional  specimens  are  encountered  in  which  the  elytral  punctures  are 
granulate  instead  of  simple.  The  tendency  toward  this  type  of  puncture 
appears  to  begin  at  the  flanks  and  progress  toward  the  suture.  If  only  a 
few  granular  punctures  are  present  on  a  specimen,  they  are  always  lateral 
in  position.  A  specimen  from  Grays  Wells,  Imperial  County,  California 
(OSU),  has  the  elytral  punctation  almost  entirely  granular  and  appears  to 
be  intermediate  between  this  and  the  following  subspecies. 


Cryptoglossa  laevis  papillosa  NE'W  SUBSPECIES 

(Fig.  3) 

Similar  in  form  to  C.  laevis  but  much  duller  in  luster  and  with  the  elytral 
punctures  all  strongly  granular  and  diffuse.  Only  three  specimens,  all  from 
San  Bernardino  County,  California,  show  this  extreme  modification.  I  re¬ 
gard  this  as  but  an  extreme  form  of  the  nominate  subspecies,  but  since  it 
is  geographically  disjunctive,  I  provide  it  with  a  name  to  define  relationships 

within  the  genus. 

Without  intermediate  forms,  this  would  undoubtedly  have  been  described 
as  a  distinct  species.  Champion  was  perfectly  justified  in  describing  gran- 
ulifera  as  distinct  from  mexicana  with  the  material  he  had  before  him. 
The  present  situation  is  similar. 

The  three  specimens  studied  are  designated  as  follows:  Holotype  (male) 
and  allotype  (female),  Barstow,  California,  May  17,  E.  S.  Ross  (CAS), 
1  paratype  (female),  Kelso  Dunes,  California,  May  25,  1958,  E.  L. 

Sleeper  (LBSC). 


Cryptoglossa  mexicana  mexicana  Champion 

(Figs.  3,  4) 

This  is  a  moderately  large,  broad  species,  dull  to  feebly  shining  in  luster 
and  with  the  dorsum  much  flatter  than  in  laevis  and  verrucosa.  Punctation 
of  the  elytra  is  variable.  In  specimens  from  the  type  locality  (Monclova, 
Coahuila,  Mexico)  the  punctures  are  simple  except  in  the  humeral  region 
where  they  are  minutely  granular  or  muricate  (J.  Balfour-Browne,  in  litt.). 
I  have  observed  this  same  type  of  punctation  on  specimens  from  Sierra  de 
los  Burros,  Coahuila  (CAS). 

On  August  15,  1962,  Dr.  Howard  V.  Weems,  Jr.,  and  I  were  collecting 
insects  at  night  around  an  abandoned  house  at  Oak  Spring,  in  the  Chisos 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


49 


Mountains,  Big  Bend  National  Park,  Brewster  County,  Texas.  Thirteen 
specimens  of  Cryptoglossa  were  taken,  most  of  them  crawling  up  from 
under  the  lloor  ot  a  screened  back  porch  of  the  house.  They  are  presumably 
nocturnal  since  previous  collecting  at  the  same  site  in  daylight  hours 
several  days  before  was  totally  unproductive. 

A  careful  study  of  the  above  mentioned  series  revealed  a  rather  striking 
range  of  variation  in  the  punctation  of  the  elytra.  In  four  specimens  the 
punctures  are  simple  with  a  slightly  muricate  tendency  on  the  anterior 
margins.  In  five  of  them  the  punctures  are  distinctly  muricate,  and  in  the 
remaining  four,  the  punctures  are  in  the  form  of  fine  granules.  It  would 
seem,  therefore,  that  the  variation  exhibited  by  this  series  ranges  from  the 
typical  mexicana  punctation  through  a  gradient  with  its  highest  develop¬ 
ment  exemplified  by  grcmulifera. 

Specimens  from  this  series  which  exhibited  the  above  variation  were 
submitted  to  Mr.  J.  Balfour-Browne  who  very  kindly  compared  them  with 
the  Champion  types  in  the  British  Museum  of  Natural  History.  He  states 
that  “they  agree  excellently  with  the  four  types  of  mexicana,  all  from 
Monclova,  Coahuila."  He  also  added  that  the  elytral  punctures  of  the  types 
are  more  clearly  punctiform  and  more  distinctly  serially  arranged  than 
those  of  the  Texas  specimens. 

Blaisdell  ( 1945)  did  not  recognize  C.  mexicana  as  occurring  north  of  the 
Rio  Grande  but  referred  all  of  his  specimens  of  this  complex  to  granulijera 
after  commenting  upon  the  range  of  variation  in  elytral  punctation  which 
they  exhibited.  Through  the  courtesy  of  Mr.  Hugh  B.  Leech  of  the  Cal¬ 
ifornia  Academy  of  Sciences,  it  has  been  possible  to  study  the  specimens 
Blaisdell  had  before  him.  Blaisdell’s  specimens  from  Coahuila  and  El  Paso, 
Texas,  are  referrable  to  the  present  nominate  subspecies  and  all  of  the 
others  to  subspecies  granulijera.  These  two  taxa  are  not  sharply  defined, 
one  from  the  other.  My  initial  impulse  was  to  synonymize  the  name 
granulijera  in  the  face  of  the  bewildering  variations  encountered.  On  the 
other  hand,  I  have  never  seen  specimens  from  the  United  States  with 
simple  elytral  punctures  except  from  the  Big  Bend  area  and  El  Paso,  Texas. 
In  order  to  clarify  the  relationships  within  the  genus  it  seems  best  to 
retain  the  name  granulijera. 

Specimens  examined  and  assigned  to  the  nominate  subspecies  are  as 
follows:  UNITED  STATES:  Texas:  (13)  Oak  Spring,  Chisos  Mts.,  Big 
Bend  National  Park,  August  15,  1962,  C.  A.  Triplehorn  and  H.  V. 
Weems,  Jr.  (OSU,  FSCA),  (1)  Chisos  Basin,  Big  Bend  National  Park, 
August  12,  1962,  W.  E.  and  C.  A.  Triplehorn  (OSU),  (1)  Big  Bend  Na¬ 
tional  Park,  September  29,  1952,  Peter  Koch  (OSU),  (1)  Chisos  Mts., 
July  22,  J.  W.  Green  (OSU),  (3)  Black  Gap,  Big  Bend  National  Park, 
July  10,  1960,  R.  A.  Scheibner  (MSU),  ( 1 )  El  Paso,  June,  1884  (CAS), 
(1)  El  Paso,  March  14,  1941  (USNM);  (1)  El  Paso,  May  18,  1957, 
J.  W.  Green  (USNM);  Sabinal,  June,  1910,  F.  C.  Pratt  (USNM),  (1) 
Val  Verde  Co.,  Pecos  River  Bridge  on  U.S.  90,  October  8,  1958,  H.  V. 
Weems,  Jr.  (FSCA).  MEXICO:  Coahuila:  (2)  Sierra  de  los  Burros,  June 
8  and  18,  1938,  Rollin  H.  Baker  (CAS);  Nuevo  Leon:  Sabinas  Hidalgo, 
June  15,  1939,  Ralph  Haag,  cave  in  bat  dung  (MCZ). 


50 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


Cryptoglossa  mexicana  granulif era  Champion 

(Figs.  3,  5) 

The  status  of  this  taxon  has  been  summarized  under  the  nominate 
subspecies.  I  have  restricted  this  name  to  include  only  those  specimens 
in  which  the  granular  type  of  elytral  punctation  prevails.  This  is  a  rather 
poorly  defined  geographic  race,  represented  in  collections  which  I  have 
seen  by  but  a  few  specimens  as  follows:  UNITED  STATES:  Arizona:  (1) 
Ajo  Mts.,  October  16,  1934,  Bryant  (CAS) ;  New  Mexico :  (5)  Las  Cruces 


to  mm. 


Figures  4-9,  Cryptoglossa  spp.  All  shown  to  same  scale.  4 — C.  mexicana  mexicana 
Champion;  Chisos  Mts.,  Texas.  5 — C.  mexicana  granulifera  Champion;  Isla  Partida, 
Gulf  of  California.  6— C.  angularis  (Horn);  La  Paz,  Baja  California.  7 — C.  ver¬ 
rucosa  verrucosa  (LeConte);  near  Desemboque,  Sonora,  Mexico.  8  C.  verrucosa 
carinulata  Blaisdell;  Death  Valley,  California  (PARATYPE).  9— C.  laevis  laevis 
(LeConte);  Los  Medanos,  Baja  California.  (Photographs  by  Robert  B.  Welch,  De¬ 
partment  of  Photography,  The  Ohio  State  University.) 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


51 


(NMS),  (1)  Las  Cruces,  August  15,  D.  J.  and  J.  N.  Knull  (OSU);  (3) 
Las  Cruces,  May  1,  1917,  T.  E.  Snyder  (USNM);  Texas:  (1)  Fort  Davis, 
June  23,  1949,  W.  C.  Stehr  (Ohio  University).  MEXICO:  Baja  Califor¬ 
nia:  (1)  Isla  la  Partida,  June  26,  1921,  Virgil  Owen  (CAS). 

The  specimens  from  which  the  original  description  was  taken  are  from 
Villa  Lerdo,  Durango,  Mexico.  J.  Balfour-Browne  stated  (in  litt.)  that  the 
type  series  of  mexicana  and  granulifera  are  “very  uniform  as  to  the  elytral 
sculpture  within  each  series.”  He  concurs  with  my  decision  to  regard  the 
two  forms  as  extremes  of  one  species. 

Crypto glossa  angularis  (Horn) 

(Fig.  6) 

From  all  of  the  known  species,  angularis  differs  in  having  the  hind  angles 
of  the  pronotum  distinctly  everted  and  the  lateral  margins  in  front  of  them 
slightly  reflexed  (Blaisdell,  1945).  The  elytral  intervals  are  subsulcate  with 
coarse  tubercles  along  their  crests.  These  tubercles  are  more  strongly  de¬ 
veloped  laterally  than  on  the  disc. 

The  previous  distribution  given  by  Blaisdell  (1945)  was  La  Paz, 
Santiago,  and  Catavina,  all  in  Baja  California.  I  have  seen  only  the  La  Paz 
specimen.  In  addition,  I  am  assigning  a  specimen  identified  by  Blaisdell  as 
C.  granulifera,  and  mentioned  under  that  name  in  his  1945  synopsis,  to  the 
present  species.  The  specimen  is  from  Borrego  Canyon,  San  Diego  County, 
California,  March  22,  1930,  B.  Templeton  (CAS).  It  is  actually  some¬ 
what  intermediate  in  regard  to  elytral  sculpture  between  the  extreme  forms 
of  mexicana  (granulifera)  and  the  true  angularis  which  I  know  only  from 
the  one  specimen  plus  Horn’s  description  and  figure.  Nevertheless,  by 
Blaisdell’s  own  brief  diagnosis,  this  specimen  from  California  is  a  perfectly 
good  angularis.  Until  additional  specimens  become  available  from  northern 
Baja  California  and  southern  California,  it  seems  advisible  to  regard  this 
as  a  distinct  species.  Further  collecting  will  perhaps  provide  intermediate 
forms  and  prove  angularis  to  be  but  a  further  extreme  modification  of  the 

mexicana-granulifera  line  of  evolution. 

* 

Literature  Cited 

Blaisdell,  Frank  E. 

1943.  Contributions  toward  a  knowledge  of  the  insect  fauna  of  Lower  Cal¬ 
ifornia,  No.  7,  Coleoptera:  Tenebrionidae.  Proc.  California  Acad.  Sci. 
(4)24:171-287,  pis.  10-11. 

1945.  Synoptic  review  of  the  known  species  of  Cryptoglossa  Solier,  with  de¬ 
scription  of  a  new  subspecies  (Coleoptera:  Tenebrionidae).  Pan-Pacific 
Ent.  21:23-29. 

i  Casey,  Thomas  L. 

1924.  Additions  to  the  known  Coleoptera  of  North  America.  Mem.  Coleop 
11:1-347. 

Champion,  George  C. 

1884.  Heteromera  (in  part).  Biologia  Centrali-Americana,  Insecta,  Coleoptera 
4(1 )  1884- 1888: i-xxiv,  1-476,  pis.  1-21.  (pp.  1-88  issued  1884) 

1892.  Heteromera  (in  part),  Supplement.  Biologia  Centrali-Americana,  Insecta, 
Coleoptera  4(1)  1892-1893:477-572,  pis.  22-23.  (pp.  477-524  issued  1892) 


52 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


Horn,  George  H. 

1894.  The  Coleoptera  of  Baja  California.  Proc.  California  Acad.  Sci.  (2)4:302- 
449,  pis.  7,  8. 

LeConte,  John  L. 

1851.  Descriptions  of  new  species  of  Coleoptera  from  California.  Ann.  Lyc. 
Nat.  Hist.  New  York  5:125-184. 

Solier,  Antoine  J.  J. 

1836.  Essai  sur  les  collapterides  (suite).  Ann.  Soc.  Ent.  France  5:635-684,  illus. 


BOOK  REVIEW 

MONOGRAPHIE  DES  “ANILLINI,”  BEMB1DIIDAE  ENDOGES  (COLEOP¬ 
TERA  TRECHIDAE).  By  Rene  Jeannel.  Memoires  du  Museum  National  d’Histoire 
Naturelle  (Paris),  n.s.,  Ser.  A.,  Zoologie,  t.  28,  fasc.  2,  pp.  33-204,  360  figs.,  1963. 

In  the  inimitable  way  in  which  he  can  view  a  world  fauna  and  draw  generalizations 
from  it,  Jeannel  has  monographed  the  tiny,  soil-inhabiting  carabids  of  the  subtribe 
Anillina  (Bembidiini).  Although  he  published  a  major  paper  on  the  group  in  1937 
(Rev.  francais  d’Ent.  3:241-394,  245  figs.)  and  reviewed  the  African  and  Madagascan 
genera  in  1957  (Ann.  Mus.  Congo  Beige,  Zool.,  52,  68  pp.,  91  figs.),  the  availability 
of  much  additional  material  prompted  a  complete  revision.  Anillines  are  very  small 
(1-2  mm),  testaceous,  wingless,  and  usually  eyeless.  They  occur  almost  exclusively 
in  deep  humus  or  soil  in  forests  of  the  temperate  zones  or  at  high  elevations  in  the 
tropics.  Material  is  rare  because  most  anillines  are  highly  localized  and  because  the 
special  techniques  of  the  soil  zoologist  are  required  to  collect  large  series. 

An  earlier  classification  of  the  anillines  into  Anillina  and  Scotodipnina,  based  on 
the  umbilicate  (marginal)  series  of  setiferous  punctures  of  the  elytra,  has  been  aban¬ 
doned.  Although  the  umbilicate  chaetotaxy  is  still  important,  Jeannel  now  believes  that 
the  presence  (Aphaenodontes)  or  absence  (Phanerodontes)  of  a  tooth  on  the  mentum 
provides  a  more  natural  basis  for  establishing  a  primary  subdivision.  As  is  his 
custom,  Jeannel  has  grouped  supposedly  related  genera  into  phyletic  series,  of  which 
there  are  eleven  for  the  anillines.  Forty-two  genera  and  137  species  are  recognized. 
Twenty  genera  were  previously  proposed  by  Jeannel  himself,  and  he  establishes  9 
more  here.  Generic  boundaries  seem  well  chosen,  even  though  the  average  number 
of  species  per  genus  is  low  (15  genera  are  monobasic),  and  the  geographic  distribu¬ 
tions  of  the  genera  are  rather  restricted.  When  more  specimens  have  been  collected, 
future  revisions  will  certainly  be  necessary,  but  they  will  probably  not  result  in  any 
substantial  reduction  in  the  number  of  genera  or  species. 

Both  ecological  and  taxonomic  evidence  suggest  a  very  low  mobility  for  anillines. 
The  pattern  of  generic  distribution  indicates  appreciable  antiquity  with  intermediate 
extinction  for  most  of  the  lineages  of  the  subtribe.  Jeannel  regards  the  anillines  as 
relics  of  eyed,  winged  carabids  inhabiting  the  humus  of  the  Cretaceous  forests.  Dur¬ 
ing  the  cooling,  drying  trend  of  the  later  Cenozoic  they  became  adapted  to  an 
endogenous  mode  of  life,  losing  eyes  and  wings  and  becoming  stenohygrobic  in  the 
process. 

The  known  anillines  are  most  numerous  and  varied  in  Europe,  Africa,  and  the 
Indo-Australian  region.  They  are  notably  absent  from  glaciated  regions  of  the 
Northern  Hemisphere  and  from  eastern  Asia,  and  are  rather  poorly  represented  in 
the  Americas.  In  the  continental  United  States  there  are  now  4  genera — Anil  linns 
Casey  (6  spp.,  southeast),  Anillodes  Jeannel  (4  spp.,  Texas  and  California),  Anillaspis 
Casey  (2  spp.,  California),  and  Micranillodes  Jeannel  (1  sp.,  Texas). 

This  revision  opens  the  way  for  a  more  intensive  investigation  of  a  difficult  but 
potentially  rewarding  group  of  beetles.  Although  much  shorter  than  Jeannel’s  classic, 
exhaustive  “Monographic  des  Trechinae”  (L’Abeille,  1928-30),  it  is  fully  comparable 
in  depth,  and  will  stand  as  the  definitive  work  on  the  anillines  for  years  to  come. — 
Thomas  C.  Barr,  Jr.,  University  of  Kentucky,  Lexington,  Kentucky. 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


53 


A  NOTE  ON  HEMIOSUS  EXILIS  LECONTE 
(COLEOPTERA:  HYDROPHILIDAE) 

By  Eileen  R.  Van  Tassell1-  2 

During  a  preliminary  study  of  the  genus  Berosus,  an  interesting  generic 
re-assignment  was  re-discovered.3  Members  of  this  genus  show  sexual  di¬ 
morphism  in  the  tarsal  formula,  the  males  having  4-5-5,  the  females,  5-5-5. 

In  1851,  LeConte  described  Berosus  exilis  from  the  Gila  River  in 
Arizona.  His  description  made  no  reference  to  the  dual  punctation  of  the 
pronotum  or  to  the  5-segmented  tarsi  of  the  male.  In  his  1855  revision  of 
the  family  Hydrophilidae,  he  added  to  his  original  diagnosis  only  the  ob¬ 
servation  that  B.  exilis  was,  “broader  than  the  next  species  and  by  its  small 
size  very  distinct  from  all  the  preceding.” 

In  1873,  Horn  revised  the  tribe  Hydrobiini  and  noted  the  rather  unique 
form  of  the  mesosternal  protuberance  in  the  species:  “the  mesosternal 
mucro  when  seen  on  its  tip  apparently  splits  into  two  parts  in  the  form  of 
a  V,  the  open  portion  being  posteriorly.”  The  difference  in  the  tarsal 
formula  of  the  males  remained  unknown. 

A  new  genus,  Hemiosus,  was  described  by  Sharp  (1882)  in  the  Biologia 
Centrali-Americana,  based  on  14  individuals  of  a  single  species,  Hemiosus 
mac u la t us,  from  Guatemala.  The  characters  he  used  for  generic  separation 
from  Berosus  were:  short  maxillary  palpi,  dense,  silky  ventral  pubescence 
and  the  large  mesosternal  lamina,  with  “its  lower  face  forming  a  narrow, 
rhomboidal  process,  which  is  dull  and  pubescent,  like  the  rest  of  the  under 
surface.”  His  final  comment  was,  “all  the  tarsi  5-jointed,  but  the  basal  joint 
excessively  short.” 

Leech  (1943)  was  the  first  to  notice  the  similarity  between  Berosus  exilis 
LeConte  and  Hemiosus  maculatus  Sharp,  in  the  form  of  the  mesosternal 
protuberance  and  male  genitalia,  and  he  logically  placed  B.  exilis  in 
Hemiosus.  However,  three  years  earlier,  in  1940,  A.  d’Orchymont  had 
pointed  out  the  difference  of  sexual  dimorphism  in  tarsal  formulae  between 
the  two  genera,  as  well  as  the  differences  listed  by  previous  authors.  With 
this  information,  Leech  apparently  assumed  that  his  reference  of  B.  exilis 
to  Hemiosus  was  incorrect,  since  he  did  not  notice  the  tarsi,  and  published 
a  retraction  in  1948.  The  same  year,  he  recorded  in  a  separate  paper 
( 1948b)  the  presence  of  a  species  very  close  to  or  the  same  as  H.  maculatus 
Sharp  from  Baja  California,  accompanied  by  an  excellent  description. 

To  add  to  the  confusion,  a  recent  examination  of  a  series  of  small  spec¬ 
imens  sent  by  Mr.  Leech  showed  that  both  sexes  have  a  minute  first  tarsal 


^  ^  Department  of  Biology,  The  Catholic  University  of  America,  Washington  17, 

"  *  would  like  to  thank  Mr.  Hugh  B.  Leech,  California  Academy  of  Sciences,  Dr. 
L.  L.  Pechunien,  Cornell  University,  Department  of  Entomology  and  Dr.  P.  J. 
Spangler,  United  States  National  Museum,  for  the  loan  of  material. 

3  This  research  was  supported  (in  part)  by  a  Public  Health  Service  fellowship 
(number  GPM-18,641)  from  the  Division  of  General  Medical  Sciences,  Public 
Health  Service. 


54 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


segment  and  four  other  segments  of  normal  size  (figs.  1,  2).  This  species 
was  labeled  “exilis”  and  bore  the  same  locality  data  as  that  given  by  Leech 
in  his  (1943)  paper.  It  now  appears  clear  that  Leech’s  original  diagnosis 
was  correct  and  that  Berosus  exilis  LeConte  is  a  member  of  the  genus 
Hemiosus. 

Examination  of  a  single  male  paratype  of  H.  toxillus  d’Orchymont  in 
the  U.  S.  National  Museum  collection  revealed  a  very  close  similarity  with 
H.  exilis.  The  paratype  is  smaller  (2.5  mm.)  in  length,  with  the  parameres 
more  swollen  basally  in  lateral  view  and  with  the  projection  of  the  basal 
piece  more  narrow  and  constricted.  It  seems  reasonable  that  these  differ¬ 
ences  could  be  part  of  the  normal  range  of  variation  for  a  single  species. 
This  interpretation  is  supported  by  the  fact  that  d’Orchymont  did  not  know 
of  H.  exilis,  or  at  least,  did  not  refer  to  it  in  his  paper  (1940).  However, 
having  seen  only  a  single  specimen  of  H.  toxillus  from  Sinaloa,  Mexico, 
and  only  small  series  of  H.  exilis  from  Arizona  (Phoenix  and  Gila  Bend), 
it  seems  best  to  retain  both  names  although  separation  may  prove  difficult. 

The  three  North  American  species  of  Hemiosus  may  be  separated  by 
the  following  characteristics: 

1.  Pro-tarsus  with  second  segment  more  thickened  in  male  (fig.  1)  than  in  female 

(fig.  2)  and  with  a  ventral  pad  of  hairs  longer  than  in  the  other  segments;  male 
genitalia  with  median  lobe  slender  in  lateral  view  (fig.  5);  pronotum  metallic 

black,  with  broad  anterior  and  posterior  yellow  margins -  2 

Pro-tarsus  with  second  segment  not  appreciably  different  in  male  than  in  female; 
male  genitalia  with  median  lobe  broad  in  lateral  view  (fig.  4);  pronotum  entirely 
metallic  black,  without  yellow  borders;  Peru;  Guatemala;  Panama;  Mexico: 

Sinaloa,  Colima,  Baja  California - MACULATUS  Sharp 

2.  Male  genitalia  with  parameres  more  swollen  basally,  in  lateral  view,  basal  piece  with 

projection  more  constricted  (fig.  5);  size  smaller,  2.5  mm.;  Mexico:  Mazatlan, 

Sinaloa  - TOXILLUS  d'Orchymont 

Male  genitalia  with  parameres  narrower  basally,  in  lateral  view,  basal  piece  barely 
constricted,  especially  in  lateral  view  (fig.  7);  size  larger,  3. 0-3. 2  mm.;  U.S.A.: 
Arizona:  Gila  Bend,  and  Phoenix - EXILIS  LeConte 


Figures  1-2,  Hemiosus  exilis  LeConte.  1 — Protarsus  of  male.  2 — Protarsus  of 
female. 


The  male  genitalia  of  Hemiosus  species  show  some  interesting  complex¬ 
ities  not  found  in  any  species  of  Nearctic  Berosus.  The  most  obvious  of 
these  is  the  presence  of  a  pair  of  membranous,  inflated  lobes,  which  are 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


55 


situated  in  hollowed  out  cavities  in  the  parameres  in  repose  and  unite 
ventrally  beneath  the  median  lobe.  Another  peculiarity  is  the  structure  of 
the  median  lobe.  Situated  along  its  ventral  length  is  a  spinous  (H.  macula- 
tus,  figs.  3,  4)  or  slender  and  flattened  (H.  toxillus,  H.  exilis,  figs.  5-7) 
projection  which  is  barely  visible  in  repose,  but  which  becomes  displaced 
downward  when  the  genitalia  are  inflated  (fig.  4). 

These  structures  cannot  be  seen  unless  they  are  inflated;  this  was  ac¬ 
complished  by  placing  the  genitalia  in  cold  KOH  for  15  minutes,  then  re¬ 
moving  them  to  water  for  15-30  minutes.  Alcohol  usually  effected  retrac¬ 
tion  of  the  membranous  lobes,  but  glycerine  did  not.  Further  study  is 
needed  to  reveal  the  exact  nature  and  significance  of  these  interesting 
features. 


Figures  3-7,  Hemiosus  spp.  3 — H.  maculatus  Sharp,  male  genitalia,  ventral 
view,  expanded.  4 — Same,  lateral  view.  5 — H.  toxillus  d'Orchymont,  male  genitalia 
of  paratype,  lateral  view.  6 — H.  exilis  LeConte,  male  genitalia,  ventral  view,  slightly 
expanded.  7 — Same,  except  basal  piece  only,  lateral  view. 


56 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


Literature  Cited 


Horn,  G.  H. 

1873.  Revision  of  the  genera  and  species  of  the  tribe  Hydrobiini.  Proc.  Amer¬ 
ican  Philos.  Soc.  13:118-137. 

LeConte,  J.  L. 

1851.  Descriptions  of  new  species  of  Coleoptera  from  California.  Ann.  Lyceum 
Nat.  Hist.  New  York  5:125-219. 

1855.  Synopsis  of  the  Hydrophilidae  of  the  United  States.  Proc.  Acad.  Nat.  Sci. 
Philadelphia  7:756-375. 

Leech,  H.  B. 

1943.  Berosus  exilis  LeConte  a  Hemiosus  (Coleoptera,  Hydrophilidae).  Pan- 
Pacific  Ent.  19(2):61-62. 

1948a.  Some  Nearctic  species  of  Palpicorn  water  beetles,  new  and  old  (Coleop¬ 
tera:  Hydrophilidae).  Wasmann  Coll.  7(2):33-46. 

1948b.  Contributions  toward  a  knowledge  of  the  insect  fauna  of  Lower  Cal¬ 
ifornia.  No.  11.  Coleoptera:  Haliplidae,  Dytiscidae,  Gyrinidae,  Hydro¬ 
philidae,  Limnebiidae.  Proc.  California  Acad.  Sci.  24:375-484,  2  pi. 

d’Orchymont,  A. 

1940.  Contribution  a  l’etude  des  Palpicornia.  XIV.  Bull,  et  Ann.  Soc.  Ent. 
Belgique  80:157-197,  12  figs. 

Sharp,  D. 

1882.  Hydrophilidae.  Biologia  Centrali-Americana,  Insecta,  Coleoptera  1(2): 
53-116,  pis.  2-4. 


When  tackling  the  problem  offered  by  the  geographical  areas  of  plants,  many 
authors  have  chosen  to  discuss  peculiar  or  singular  types  having  a  distribution  out 
of  the  common,  in  the  hope  that  they  will  suddenly  give  a  clue  to  the  solution  of 
the  problem.  This  is  merely  appealing  to  the  imagination,  it  is,  so  to  speak,  a  romantic 
method  of  investigation.  ...  It  is  surely  more  rational  to  start  the  investigation  with 
the  simplest  types,  those  that  show  the  least  possible  peculiarities.  When  they  have 
been  interpreted,  the  complicated  and  often  strongly  interrupted  areas  of  the 
singular  or  peculiar  types  are  likely  to  be  better  understood.  This  is  a  more  prosaic, 
but  probably  also  a  safer  method  of  procedure. — Eric  Hulten,  1937,  Outline  of 
the  History  of  Arctic  and  Boreal  Biota  during  the  Quarternary  Period. 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


57 


MANDA,  A  GENUS  NEW  TO  THE  NEARCTIC  REGION 
(COLEOPTERA:  STAPHYLINIDAE) 

By  Ian  Moore1-  2 

I  he  genus  Manda  Blackwelder  has  not  previously  been  reported  from 
the  Western  Hemisphere.  It  belongs  to  the  tribe  Coprophilini  of  the  sub¬ 
family  Oxytelinae.  Members  of  the  Oxytelinae  can  be  distinguished  from 
all  other  staphylinids  by  the  presence  of  a  complete  second  sternite  (rarely 
rudimentary  in  some  specimens  of  a  few  species  of  the  Coprophilini).  The 
Coprophilini  are  characterized  by  having  five  tarsal  segments,  whereas  in 
the  Oxytelinii  a  lesser  number  is  present. 

Key  to  the  Nearctic  Genera  of  the  Coprophilini" 


1.  Tibae  spinose  on  outer  edge -  2 

Tibae  not  spinose  on  outer  edge - - -  3 

Gular  sutures  divergent  before  the  middle;  ungues  strongly  arcuate -  ELONIUM 

Gular  sutures  united;  ungues  hardly  arcuate -  MANDA 

3.  Gular  sutures  separate  - RIMULINCOLA 

Gular  sutures  united -  4 

4.  Tenth  antennomere  transverse;  head  hardly  narrowed  behind  the  eyes - SYNTOMIUM 

Tenth  antennomere  elongate;  head  strongly  narrowed  behind  the  eyes  - DELEASTER 


Manda  Blackwelder 

Manda  Blackwelder,  1952,  Bull.  200  U.  S.  Nat.  Mus.,  p.  230. 

Acrognathus  Erichson,  1938,  Die  Kafer  der  Mark  Brandenberg,  Berlin, 
p.  609  (not  Agassiz,  1826). 

Type-species  of  both  generic  names  is  Ornalium  mandibularis  Gyllenhal. 

Form.  Linear,  subcylindrical,  subparallel.  Head.  Subquadrate,  not  narrowed  behind 
to  form  a  neck,  with  a  nuchal  constriction  across  the  head  immediately  behind  the 
eyes.  Antennae  strongly  incrassate,  their  fossae  located  under  a  prominence  near 
the  eyes  above  the  bases  of  the  mandibles.  Eyes  large,  protruding,  coarsely  faceted. 
Mandibles  long,  slender,  pointed,  without  internal  teeth.  Labrum  transverse,  apex 
broadly  emarginate.  Maxillary  palpi  four-segmented;  first  segment  short;  second 
and  third  segments  subequal  in  length,  about  twice  as  long  as  wide,  slightly  arcuate; 
fourth  a  little  narrower  and  longer  than  third,  almost  three  times  as  long  as  wide, 
swollen  at  base,  thence  tapered  and  slightly  sinuate  to  the  pointed  apex.  Ligula  deeply 
emarginate  at  apex.  Gular  sutures  united.  Thorax.  Pronotum  trapezoidal,  widest  at 
apex.  Prosternum  short,  its  process  pointed.  Lateral  prosternal  sutures  distinct. 
Hypomera  delimited  by  a  carina.  Trochantin  slender.  Prosternal  epimera  delimited 
by  sutures.  Mesosternum  moderate,  its  process  pointed.  Metasternum  large,  its 
process  short  and  pointed.  Elytra  quadrate,  sutural  stria  fine.  Scutellum  small. 
Coxae  large,  exserted  and  contiguous.  Tibiae  strongly  spinose.  Tarsi  slender,  five- 
segmented,  first  four  segments  short  and  subaequal,  last  about  as  long  as  the  first 


1  Associate  in  Entomology,  San  Diego  Natural  History  Museum. 

-  I  am  indebted  to  Hugh  B.  Leech  of  the  California  Academy  of  Sciences  for  four 
of  these  specimens,  and  to  William  C.  Stehr  of  the  Ohio  University  for  the  other  two. 

;!  Zalohius  and  Asemohius  have  been  removed  to  the  Piestinae  by  Moore,  1963, 
Coleop.  Bull.  5:47-48. 


58 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


four  together.  Abdomen.  First  four  visible  segments  with  paratergites.  First  four 
visible  tergites  impressed  at  base. 

Distribution.  The  two  previously  described  species  are  mandibularis 
(Gyllenhal),  found  throughout  Europe  and  Siberia,  and  africana  (Fair- 

maire)  from  Tunis. 


Manda  nearctica  Moore,  NEW  SPECIES 

Color  Pale  rufo-testaceous,  with  the  head  and  tip  of  abdomen  a  little  darker  and 
the  legs  testaceous.  Head  about  as  wide  as  long,  surface  irregularly  convex  in  front 

of  the  transverse  constriction,  with  a  vague 
^  central  tumidity  on  which  are  eight  coarse 

<DOOoooc^  punctures  and  a  few  almost  imperceptible 

^  punctulae;  otherwise  highly  polished.  Beneath 

distinctly  reticulate,  impunctate.  Eyes  very 
prominent,  longer  than  the  tempora,  coarsely 
faceted  with  a  few  small  setae  between  the 
facets.  Antennae  a  little  longer  than  the  head 
and  pronotum,  strongly  incrassate;  first  anten- 
nomere  thick,  more  than  twice  as  long  as  wide; 
second  narrower,  less  than  half  as  long  as  first, 
more  than  twice  as  long  as  wide;  third  about  as 
long  and  as  wide  as  second;  fourth  to  sixth 
about  as  long  as  wide,  not  wider  than  third; 
seventh  to  tenth  progressively  wider,  tenth  al¬ 
most  twice  as  wide  as  long;  eleventh  as  wide  as 
tenth,  longer  than  wide,  pointed.  Thorax.  Pro¬ 
notum  trapezoidal,  widest  at  apex,  apex  and 
sides  straight,  base  gently  arcuate,  angles  nar¬ 
rowly  rounded;  surface  convex,  with  a  few 
large  irregularly  placed  punctures  except  in  a 
central  longitudinal  area;  interspaces  highly 
polished.  Beneath  impunctate.  Elytra  longer 
than  wide,  widest  at  apex;  sides  straight,  angles 
rounded;  with  four  moderately  impressed  series 


Fig.  1.  Manda  nearctica. 


of  coarse  punctures;  interspaces  highly  polished.  Abdomen  with  a  very  few  regularly 
placed  small  punctures,  finely  and  feebly  reticulate.  Beneath  sculptured  as  above,  but 
with  the  punctures  a  little  more  evident.  Apex  of  seventh  visible  stermte  produced  in 
a  small  central  lobe. 

Holotype.  Sex  unknown.  Archbold  Biological  Station,  Lake  Placid, 
Florida,  IV- 1-47,  J.  W.  Green,  collector.  In  California  Academy  of  Sciences. 

Paratypes.  One,  same  data  as  holotype;  two,  Jacksonville,  Florida, 
VII  I- 14_  1942,  R.  C.  Barnes,  collector;  two,  Jacksonville,  Florida,  VIII- 
1942,  G.  S.  Hensill,  collector.  In  California  Academy  of  Sciences  and  my 
own  collection. 

Notes.  This  species  differs  from  mandibularis  and  africana  in  its  much 
smaller  size,  paler  integuments  and  particularly  from  the  former  in  the 
highly  polished  foreparts,  these  parts  being  densely  reticulate  in  that  species. 


1. 

2. 


Key  to  the  Species  of  Manda 


Abdomen  black 
Abdomen  brown 
Head,  pronotum 
Head,  pronotum 


or  testaceous - 

and  elytra  densely  reticulate 
and  elytra  highly  polished — 


- AFRICANA 

-  2 

MANDIBULARIS 
- NEARCTICA 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


59 


DOES  GEHRINGIA  BELONG  TO  THE  ISOCHAETA? 
(COLEOPTERA:  CARABIDAE) 

By  Ross  T.  Bell1-  2 


The  minute  and  aberrant  carabid  Gehringia  olympica  Darlington  has 

been  difficult  to  put  into  the  classification  of  the  family.  Darlington  (1933), 

following  the  system  used  in  the  Leng  Catalogue  (1920),  placed  it  in  the 

subfamily  Carabinae. 

■r 

Jeannel  (1941)  proposed  a  new  classification  of  the  Carabidae  (which 
he  raised  to  the  rank  of  superfamily),  in  which  the  primary  division  was 
into  a  Series  Isochaeta  and  a  Series  Anisochaeta.  (For  a  general  discussion 
of  this  and  other  proposed  classifications  of  the  Carabidae,  see  Ball,  1960.) 
In  the  Series  Isochaeta,  Jeannel  grouped  those  carabids  in  which  both  spurs 
of  the  anterior  tibia  are  terminal  in  position,  the  posterior  one  not  being 
displaced  proximally  by  the  antenna  cleaner.  The  latter  is  a  well-developed 
emargination  lying  entirely  proximad  to  the  spurs.  The  Series  Anisochaeta 
included  those  carabids  in  which  the  posterior  spur  is  displaced  more  or 
less  proximally,  and  the  antenna  cleaner,  if  well  developed,  lies  between 
the  spurs.  He  placed  Gehringia  in  the  Isochaeta.  Lindroth  (1960)  and  Ball 
(1960)  regard  the  Isochaeta  as  an  artificial  assemblage,  and  split  it  into 
several  subfamilies.  Nevertheless,  they  use  the  isochaetous  type  of  anterior 
tibia  as  one  of  several  characters  justifying  the  inclusion  of  Gehringia  with 
Trachypachus  in  a  subfamily  Trachypachidinae  (spelled  Trachypachinae 
by  Lindroth) . 

Recently,  while  investigating  the  mouth  parts  of  Gehringia,  I  had  the 
opportunity  of  examining  and  drawing  the  leg  of  a  cleared  specimen  (Fig. 
1).  I  noted  that,  although  there  appeared  to  be  two  spurs,  they  are  not 
arranged  as  in  other  Isochaeta.  The  larger  spur  lies  on  the  inner  margin 
of  the  tibia.  A  line  of  stiff  hairs  leads  from  it  to  the  antenna-cleaner.  It 
is,  therefore,  evidently  homologous  to  the  anterior  tibial  spur  of  other 
Carabidae.  The  other  spur,  which  is  considerably  smaller,  does  not  lie  on 
the  inner  face  posterior  to  the  anterior  spur,  as  would  be  expected  in 
Isochaeta,  but  is  instead  located  on  the  outer  margin,  slightly  proximad 
to  the  apex  of  the  tibia.  The  margin  of  the  latter  is  oblique  for  a  short 
distance  between  the  outer  “spur”  and  the  base  of  the  tarsus.  Proximad 
to  it,  a  row  of  very  fine  but  rather  long  setae  extends  up  the  outer  face  of 
the  tibia.  It  seems  probable  that  the  supposed  second  spur  is  really  a  spinose 
hair,  representing  the  lowest  one  on  the  series  on  the  outer  face  of  the 
tibia.  This  theory  is  rendered  more  plausible  by  the  presence  of  a  much 
larger  spur-like  structure  on  the  ventral  margin  of  the  femur,  in  a  location 
where  most  carabids  have  a  tactile  seta. 


1  Department  of  Zoology,  University  of  Vermont,  Burlington,  Vermont. 

-  I  am  indebted  to  Philip  J.  Darlington,  Jr.,  and  to  George  Ball  for  the  specimens 
used  in  this  study;  and  to  my  wife,  Joyce  R.  Bell,  for  the  dissections  and  drawings. 


60 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


In  Tachys  (Tribe  Bembidiini),  a  spinose  hair  forms  a  false  spur  in 
exactly  the  same  position  as  in  Gehringia.  In  Tachys,  however,  there  is  a 
well-developed  spur  associated  with  the  antenna-cleaner,  so  that  the  front 
tibia  appears  to  have  three  spurs.  If  a  species  of  Tachys  were  to  lose  the 
proximal  (originally  the  posterior)  spur  above  the  antenna-cleaner,  it 
would  then  have  an  anterior  tibia  almost  identical  to  that  of  Gehringia. 
Since  the  posterior  tibial  spur  has  completely  disappeared,  it  can  not  be 
used  in  deciding  whether  Gehringia  belongs  with  the  Isochaeta  or  the 
Anisochaeta. 

However,  a  feature  of  the  mouth  parts  suggests  that  Gehringia  should 
be  excluded  from  the  Isochaeta.  With  the  exception  of  Gehringia,  all  of 
the  Isochaeta  which  I  have  been  able  to  study  have  shown  a  characteristic 
reduplication  of  the  tactile  setae  of  the  labrum.  In  Gehringia  (Fig.  2), 
there  are  only  the  six  setae  found  in  almost  all  Carabidae.  In  Trachypachus 
(Fig.  4),  Metrius,  and  in  the  two  genera  of  Ozaenini  available  to  me, 
Tropopsis  and  Mysteropomus  (Fig.  3),  there  are  approximately  twelve 
tactile  setae  on  the  labrum,  although  the  number  seems  to  vary  slightly. 
This  character  seems  to  imply  that  the  Isochaeta  are  a  natural  group  and 
that  Gehringia  should  be  excluded  from  it. 


Figure  1 — Gehringia  olympica  Darlington,  anterior  view  of  anterior  leg.  Figure 
2 — Gehringia  olympica  Darlington,  labrum,  dorsal  view.  Figure  3 — Mysteropomus 
regularis  Banninger,  labrum,  dorsal  view.  Figure  4 — Trachypachus  gibbsi,  LeConte, 
labrum,  dorsal  view. 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


61 


If  it  is  desired  to  modify  the  classification  of  Ball,  Gehringia  should  be 
transferred  to  the  Subfamily  Carabinae,  of  which  it  may  form  a  Tribe, 
Gehringiini.  (The  Subfamily  Carabinae  of  Ball  is  approximately  equivalent 
to  the  Anisochaeta  of  Jeannel.)  The  removal  of  Gehringia  would  leave 
the  Isochaeta  as  a  relatively  homogeneous  group,  with  the  structure  of  the 
tibial  spurs,  antenna-cleaner,  and  the  chaetotaxy  of  the  labrum  as  common 
characters.  I  believe  that  these  characters  imply  a  real  relationship,  and 
that  the  Subfamilies  Paussinae,  Metriinae,  and  Trachypachydinae  (exclud¬ 
ing  Gehringiini)  of  Ball  should  be  united  to  form  a  Subfamily  Paussinae, 
approximately  equivalent  to  Jeannel’s  Isochaeta. 


Literature  Cited 

I  Ball,  G.  E. 

1960.  Carabidae,  pp.  55-181,  in  R.  H.  Arnett,  The  Beetles  of  the  United  States. 
Catholic  University  Press,  1112  pp.,  Washington,  D.  C. 

Darlington,  P.  J. 

1933.  A  new  tribe  of  Carabidae  from  western  United  States.  Pan-Pacific  Ent 
IX  (3),  110-114. 

Jeannel,  R. 

1941.  Coleopteres  carabiques  (1)  Faune  de  France,  39:1-571,  Paris. 

Leng,  C.  W. 

1920.  Catalogue  of  the  Coleoptera  of  America,  North  of  Mexico.  470  pp., 
J.  D.  Sherman,  Jr.,  Mount  Vernon,  N.  Y. 

Lindroth,  C.  H. 

1960.  The  ground  beetles  of  Canada  and  Alaska  (2),  Opusc.  Ent.  Suppl. 
XX:  1-200,  Lund,  Sweden. 


9 


CEUTORHYNCHUS  ASSIMILIS  (PAYK.),  NEW  TO  EASTERN 
NORTH  AMERICA  (COLEOPTERA:  CURCULIONIDAE) . 

The  finding  of  C.  assimilis  (Payk.)  May  16,  1960,  on  turnips,  in  Henderson  Co., 
North  Carolina,  represents  the  first  record  of  this  species  in  eastern  North  America. 
A  serious  pest  of  Cruciferae,  the  species  was  previously  found  only  in  the  Pacific 
Northwest,  in  Washington,  Oregon,  British  Columbia,  and  northern  California  — 
Rose  Ella  Warner,  Ent.  Res.  Div.,  A.R.S.,  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture, 
yvashington,  D.  C. 


62 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


BOOK  REVIEW 


MONOGRAPHIE  DER  SCARAB AEIDAE  UND  APHODIIDAE  DER  PALAE- 
ARKTISCHEN  UND  ORIENTALISCHEN  REGION,  COLEOPTERA:  LAMELLI- 
CORNIA,  Vols.  1  &  2.  By  Vladimir  Balthasar.  Verlag  der  Tschechoslowakischen 
Akademie  der  Wissenschaften,  Prague;  Voi.  1,  391  pages,  137  figures,  24  plates;  Vol. 
2,  627  pages,  226  figures,  16  plates.  1963. 


The  appearance  of  Dr.  Balthasar’s  magnum  opus  has  been  eagerly  awaited  tor 
some  time.  The  manuscript  for  it  seems  to  have  been  completed  in  1959  or  earlier. 
In  that  year,  several  American  colleagues  received  a  mimeographed  circular  from 
the  Publishing  House  of  the  Czech  Academy  requesting  their  participation  in  a 
“promotion  campaign’’  for  the  monograph,  apparently  for  the  purpose  of  gauging 
its  sales  potential.  In  May  of  the  same  year  this  reviewer  also  received  a  letter  from 
the  Czech  Academy  explaining  that  there  would  be  a  delay  in  publication  because 
of  the  high  costs,  and  that  “it  is  therefore  a  question  of  reducing  the  expected 
financial  loss  to  an  amount  which  will  make  it  bearable  and  enable  us  to  fulfill  our 
duties  to  other  authors  as  well.”  This  hesitation,  puzzling  at  the  time,  becomes  a 
little  more  understandable  now  that  we  see  the  lavishness  of  the  final  product.  The 
two  volumes  are  printed  on  high-quality  paper  and  profusely  illustrated  with  line 
drawings,  maps,  and  photographs.  There  appear  to  be  few  typographical  errors  and 
the  books  are  finely  bound  in  hard,  gold-embossed  covers  provided  with  colorful 
jackets  The  Publishing  House  of  the  Czech  Academy  is  to  be  congratulated  on  a 
superb  presentation.  The  delay  of  at  least  five  years  in  publication,  however,  means 
that  the  reader  must  allow  for  the  omission  of  recent  data  on  the  groups  covered. 


With  these  two  volumes  (and  a  third  on  Aphodiinae  soon  to  appear)  Dr.  Balthasar 
crowns  35  years  of  experience  with  the  Scarabaeinae  and  Aphodiinae  of  the  world, 
during  which  he  has  published  about  125  papers  and  books  on  these  groups.  As  he 
says  in  the  introduction,  “hundreds  of  thousands  of  specimens  have  passed  through 
my  hands  ...  the  greater  part  of  the  Scarabaeoid  material  of  all  large  European 
museums  is  known  to  me  .  .  .  and  the  material  from  most  of  the  entomological 
expeditions  of  the  last  decades  has  been  entrusted  to  me.”  He  has  described  many  new 
species  during  this  time,  mostly  in  the  Aphodiinae  and  New  World  Scarabaeinae. 
Evidently  Dr.  Balthasar’s  qualifications  for  undertaking  a  work  of  this  scope  are  not 
to  be  doubted. 


Volumes  1  and  2  deal  with  what  is  commonly  known  as  the  Scarabaeinae  or 
Coprinae.  The  first  volume  begins  with  general  remarks  on  the  “Superfamily 
Scarabaeoidea”  (Family  Scarabaeidae  of  most  workers)  and  a  conspectus  of  the 
families,  subfamilies,  and  tribes.  This  is  followed  by  brief  introductions  to  morpho¬ 
logical  features,  internal  anatomy,  larval  morphology,  brood  care,  feeding  ecology, 
ecological  distribution,  parasites,  phylogeny  (including  fossils),  and  geographical  dis¬ 
tribution.  The  subsequent  systematic  part,  which  occupies  seven  eighths  of  the  work, 
begins  with  a  key  to  the  laparostict  families  and  subfamilies  of  the  Palaearctic  and 
Oriental  regions,  and  continues  with  a  detailed  account  of  all  taxa  down  to  species 
of  the  “Family  Scarabaeidae”;  this  is  continued  into  the  second  volume. 

The  introductory  portion,  while  occupying  only  an  eighth  of  the  work,  is  the  one 
non-specialists  are  likely  to  read  and  is  the  most  disappointing.  It  begins  with  a  con¬ 
spectus  of  higher  categories,  departing  radically  from  that  which  has  become  gen¬ 
erally  accepted  by  scarabaeidists.  For  instance,  the  Passalidae  and  Lucanidae  are 
placed  together  in  a  “Superfamily  Lucanoidea,”  implying  that  the  degree  of  similar- 
ity  between  them  is  of  the  same  order  as,  say,  the  similarity  between  Aphodndae 
and  “Aegialidae”  (the  latter  considered  a  subtribe  of  Aphodiinae  by  Landin).  On 
the  other  hand,  acanthocerids,  shown  by  Crowson  to  be  sharply  different  from  other 
scarabs,  are  considered  to  be  a  subfamily  of  Trogidae.  Throughout,  groups  are 
elevated  at  least  one  rank  above  what  they  are  considered  to  be  by  other  specialists. 
One  consequence  of  this  is  that  the  subtribes  of  Scarabaeinae  (Coprina,  Pinotina, 
etc.),  originally  proposed  by  Peringuey  in  1901  and  perpetuated  by  Gillet  and 
Janssens,  are  now  elevated  to  "tribes  of  Scarabaeidae.  Since  there  is  serious  doubt 
about  the  validity  of  some  of  these  subtribes,  it  is  indeed  unfortunate  that  their 
status  should  now  be  elevated.  It  is  not  that  changes  in  the  classification  are  unjustified, 
but  simply  that  when  a  radical  departure  from  custom  is  adopted,  it  should  be  ac- 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


63 


companied  by  a  thorough  explanation.  No  explanation  at  all  is  given  for  these 
changes;  this  is  all  the  more  puzzling  since  in  Dr.  Balthasar’s  previous  monograph 
(Fauna  CSR,  Vol.  8,  1958)  he  adhered  to  the  accepted  classification  of  Janssens. 

The  morphological  section  is  but  a  slightly  expanded  version  of  the  same  section 
m  the  Fauna  CSR,  with  examples  drawn  mostly  from  the  Geotrupinae,  Melolonthi- 
nae,  Cetoniinae,  etc. — groups  covered  in  the  Fauna  CSR  but  not  covered  in  the 
present  monograph.  The  extremely  modified  mouthparts  of  adult  Scarabaeinae, 
which  are  of  great  interest  and  pertinence  to  the  present  work,  are  not  illustrated. 
Such  data  as  are  presented  on  both  external  and  internal  morphology  are  sketchy 
and  inadequate  for  any  conceivable  purpose.  In  the  larval  section,  which  is  largely 
based  on  Medvedev’s  survey,  there  is  no  mention  of  Boving’s  studies  on  epipharyngeal 
chaetotaxy,  on  which  larval  classification  is  often  based  in  the  English-language 
literature.  Quite  astonishing  is  the  total  omission  of  any  reference  to  Gardner’s  very 
significant  studies  on  Indian  scarab  larvae;  this  is  particularly  surprising  because  these 
fall  directly  within  the  geographical  scope  of  the  work. 

The  section  on  brood  care  is  compiled  largely  from  von  Lengerken’s  book  and  is 
therefore  reasonably  reliable.  However,  there  are  a  few  original  remarks  which  are 
seriously  misleading.  For  instance,  on  p.  42,  immediately  after  mentioning  the  size 
of  the  ball  in  Heliocopris,  the  author  proceeds  in  the  next  sentence  to  talk  about  the 
fights  that  ensue  when  balls  are  rolled  over  the  surface,  implying  to  the  unwary 
reader  that  Heliocopris  rolls  balls.  On  the  other  hand,  Dr.  Balthasar  is  undoubtedly 
on  firm  ground  when  he  insists  that  the  behavioral  adaptations  of  “Scarabaeidae”  are 
responses  to  steppe  conditions. 

In  the  section  on  food  ecology,  Dr.  Balthasar  repeatedly  resorts  to  curious  lines 
of  reasoning  in  insisting  that  coprophagy  must  largely  be  limited  to  ungulate  dung. 
His  conclusion  that  saprophagy  was  the  original  type  of  feeding  in  “Scarabaeidae” 

:  (a  reasonable  assumption)  is  based  on  the  reasoning  that  when  the  group  first  arose, 
ungulates  were  not  yet  evolved.  Marsupials,  for  instance,  could  “scarcely”  have  pro¬ 
vided  the  necessary  food  for  coprophages.  The  “strict  bond”  between  dung  beetles 
and  ungulates  must  have  posed  “great  impediments”  to  the  former’s  early  dispersal. 
This  leviewer  would  like  to  know  why  the  dung  of  marsupials,  or  even  herbivorous 
reptiles,  could  not  have  served  just  as  well.  It  is  possible  that  the  association  we  see 
today  between  dung  beetles  and  ungulates  (by  no  means  exclusive)  is  due  to  the 
fact  that  ungulates  are  more  abundant  now  than  kangaroos  or  dinosaurs.  Dr.  Balthasar 
refuses  to  admit  that  the  guests  of  the  Florida  land  tortoise,  for  instance,  could  feed 
on  tortoise  dung;  he  says  that  they  must  feed  on  rabbit  or  owl  pellets  in  the  burrows. 
Literature  records  of  dung  beetles  feeding  on  bird  excrement  are  categorically  re¬ 
jected.  Similar  assertive  statements  are  made  regarding  myrmecophily.  He  says  that 
cetoniines  such  as  Potosia  must  be  accidental  in  ants’  nests  since  they  are  not  modified 
morphologically  for  myrmecophily.  Actually,  mounting  evidence  indicates  that  many 
groups  of  Cetoniinae  are  associated  with  ants,  at  least  in  the  larval  stages.  Finally, 
numerous  but  very  incomplete  data  taken  from  modern  Latin  American  workers  are 
cited  without  indication  of  their  source  anywhere  in  the  book. 

Tables  listing  myrmecophilous  species,  parasites  and  their  hosts,  and  Tertiary 
fossils  will  prove  useful  to  other  workers. 

It  is  very  unfortunate  that  Dr.  Balthasar  saw  fit  to  detract  from  the  great  overall 
value  of  this  monograph  by  including  introductory  remarks  which  are  gravely  de¬ 
ficient  in  most  respects,  and  furthermore  presenting  these  with  the  implication  that 
they  are  complete,  authoritative,  and  applicable  to  the  world  as  whole.  It  would  have 
been  far  better  to  restrict  these  to  only  what  is  necessary  to  introduce  the  main 
taxonomic  portion. 

The  taxonomic  portion,  making  up  the  greater  bulk  of  the  work,  begins  after  a 
brief  but  interesting  zoogeographical  survey.  In  bringing  together  a  vast  amount  of 
data  on  the  Palaearctic  and  Oriental  members  of  the  Scarabaeinae,  Dr.  Balthasar  has 
done  present  and  future  workers  enormous  service.  Descriptions  of  rare  genera  and 
species,  previously  scattered  in  many  works,  will  prove  extremely  useful.  The  key  to 
species  are  very  complete,  presenting  a  wide  choice  of  characters  for  use  in  iden¬ 
tification;  in  this  respect  the  keys  are  far  superior  to  those  of  Arrow  in  the  Fauna  of 
British  India.  Particularly  herculean  was  the  task  of  constructing  a  key  to  the  species 


64 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


of  Onthophagus  (555  of  them).  The  key  to  species  of  the  Subgenus  Onthophagus 
alone  comprises  868  couplets.  Seven  new  subgenera  and  two  new  species  of  Ontho¬ 
phagus  are  described,  these  being  the  only  new  taxa  in  the  monograph.  For  each 
species  throughout  the  work,  a  brief  description,  an  indication  of  geographical  and 
altitude  distribution,  and  some  ecological  information,  if  known,  are  given.  For  each 
genus  or  subgenus  there  is  a  description  and  some  ecological  remarks,  plus  a  world 
distribution  map.  Original  habitus  drawings  are  scattered  profusely  throughout  and, 
although  a  little  sketchy,  they  will  aid  greatly  in  identification  and  contribute  much 
to  the  attractiveness  of  the  work,  as  do  the  many  habitus  photographs  at  the  end 
of  each  volume. 

American  workers  will  find  some  special  objections  throughout  the  work.  Aside 
from  omitting  all  references  to  Americans,  while  at  the  same  time  using  some  of 
their  data  (as  previously  mentioned),  Dr.  Balthasar  rejects  the  current  American 
usage  of  the  names  Dichotomius  and  Ateuchus  for  what  used  to  be  Pinotus  and 
Choeridium  (with  what  justification  this  reviewer  is  not  prepared  to  say).  He  pre¬ 
sents  a  table  of  world  canthonine  genera  on  p.  257  which,  in  addition  to  being  out  of 
place  in  a  work  of  this  geographic  scope,  is  also  hopelessly  incomplete  at  present,  as 
it  was  bound  to  be  since  the  American  canthonine  studies  were  just  beginning  when 
Dr.  Balthasar  was  writing.  On  almost  every  distribution  map  presented,  the  American 
portions  of  the  distributions  are  erroneous.  For  instance,  on  p.  137  the  map  purports 
to  show  the  distribution  of  Scarabaeini  (the  Subtribe  Scarabaeina  of  other  workers) 
and  has  this  group  occupying  most  of  the  Western  Hemisphere!  This  group,  of 
course,  is  absent  from  the  Western  Hemisphere.  On  p.  234  Sisyphus  is  shown  to 
occur  in  Mexico,  but  not  in  Nicaragua,  whence  it  has  been  known  since  Belt’s  time. 
On  p.  318  the  genus  Copris  is  shown  to  occur  on  the  Galapagos  Islands  (known  to 
be  an  erroneous  or  at  least  highly  dubious  citation  for  many  years)  and  in  Baja 
California  (!),  but  not  in  Colombia  or  Ecuador,  where  it  does  occur. 

In  spite  of  the  numerous  errors  committed  whenever  the  author  departed  from  the 
strict  limits  of  the  taxonomy  of  Palaearctic  and  Oriental  species,  the  present  mono¬ 
graph  is  of  very  great  importance  because  it  is  the  first  attempt  to  cover  such  a  vast 
area.  Workers  in  Oriental  Scarabaeinae  will  find  it  supersedes  Arrow’s  Fauna  of 
British  India  (Lamellicornia,  Vol.  3)  and  Paulian’s  Faune  de  1  Empire  Frangais 
(Vol  3)  In  the  Palaearctic,  it  partly  fills  the  lacuna  left  by  the  omission  of  the 
laparosticts  from  Medvedev’s  Fauna  SSSR  (Vol.  10).  The  appearance  of  Dr. 
Balthasar’s  work  will  give  great  impetus  to  the  further  study  of  this  extremely  inter¬ 
esting  group  of  beetles. — Eric  G.  Matthews,  University  of  Puerto  Rico,  Rio  Piedras, 
Puerto  Rico. 


All  the  woods  hushed — save  for  a  dripping  rose, 

All  the  woods  dim — save  where  a  glow-worm  glows. 

Masefield,  The  Watch  in  the  Wood 


—  BACK  ISSUES— 

The  Coleopterists'  Bulletin 


Per 

Single 

Volume 

Issue 

Vol.  3,  1949,  6  issues 

(Nos.  I  &  2  o.p.)  $5.00 

$1.00 

Vol.  4,  1950,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol.  5,  1951,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol.  6,  1952,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol.  7,  1953,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol.  8,  1954,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol.  9,  1955,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol.  10,  1956,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol.  11,  1957,  2  issues 

5.00 

3.00 

Vol.  12,  1958,  1  issue 

5.00 

5.00 

Vol.  13,  1959,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol.  14,  1960,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol.  15,  1961,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol.  16,  1962,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol.  17,  1963,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

(above  prices  Postpaid) 


. ATTENTION  READERS! . 

From  time  to  time  we  receive  requests  from  our  subscribers  who 
wish  to  complete  their  holdings  of  the  Bulletin .  We  would  appre¬ 
ciate  it  if  any  readers  possessing  copies  of  Vol.  3,  No.  1,  with  which 
they  are  willing  to  part,  would  inform  the  Bulletin. 


★ 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 

620  Michigan  Avenue,  N.E. 
Washington  17,  D.  C. 


Send  today  for  your  copy  of — 

“PYGMIES  AND  PYGMOIDS: 

TWIDES  OF  TROPICAL  AFRICA” 

BY 

Martin  Gusinde,  S.V.D. 

JANUARY  1955  ISSUE  OF 
ANTHROPOLOGICAL  QUARTERLY 

•  This  interesting  and  educational  article  is 
based  on  the  author’s  original  observations, 
and  includes  a  complete  bibliography  on  the 
“PYGMIES.” 

Price:  $1.00  Postpaid 
Anthropological  Quarterly 
620  Michigan  Avenue,  N.E.,  Washington  17,  D.  C. 


Now  in  its  37th  year  — 

Anthropological  Quarterly 

(formerly  Primitive  Man) 

Issued  January,  April,  July  and  October 

(T'tO 

Some  Recent  Contents: 

Grasshoppers  as  Food  in  Buhaya . P*  O.  Mors 

A  Pygmy  Group  Newly  Discovered  in  New  Guinea.  .Martin  Gusinde 

Eskimo  Reindeer  Herding . Robert  T.  Anderson 

Rock  Paintings  of  South  Africa . Abbe  Henri  Breuil 

The  Assinboin  Horse  Medicine  Cult . John  C.  Ewers 

Treatment  of  Disease  in  the  New  Guinea  Highlands . 

Louis  J.  Luzbetak 

(Articles  on  Physical  and  Cultural  Anthropology ) 

Subscription  Price  $4.00  a  year  Single  Issues  $1.00 

Anthropological  Quarterly 

620  Michigan  Ave.,  N.E.  Washington  17,  D.  C. 


SEPTEMBER 


VOLUME  18 

OCT  22 1964 


(No.  3)  1964 


w/;  r  ^ 

* 

CHRYSOMELIDAE:  Leaf-mining  of  Lantana,  by  Krai/ss,  y .  92 

CURCULIONIDAE:  Host  records,  by  Warner .  96 

DYTISCIDAE:  New  Agabus,  by  Leech . /f .  79 

HYDROPHILIDAE:  On  Enochrus  and  Cymbiodyta,  by  Miller.  .  69 

KARUMIIDAE:  Notes,  by  Arnett .  65 

SCARAB AEIDAE:  B-P-H-H  on  Trox,  by  Arnett .  95 

STAPHYLINIDAE:  Key  to  subfamilies,  by  Moore .  83 


Literature  Notice 
Notice 


.68,  94 
78 


THE  CATHOLIC  UNIVERSITY  OF  AMERICA  PRESS 
WASHINGTON  17,  D.  C. 


A  Quarterly  Publication  Devoted 

to  the  Study  of  Beetles  biqLQGY  LIBRA] 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS*  BULLETIN 

Founded  1947  by  Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr. 

The  Coleopterists’  Bulletin  is  published  by  The  Catholic  University  of  America 
Press,  Washington  17,  D.  C.  and  edited  by  T.  J.  Spilman.  It  is  issued  four  times  a  year 
beginning  with  March.  All  business  matters  should  be  addressed  to  The  Coleopterists’ 
Bulletin  at  the  Press.  Manuscripts  and  other  editorial  matter  should  be  addressed  to 
the  editor,  U.  S.  National  Museum,  Washington  25,  D.  C. 


Subscriptions:  The  subscription  price  for 
each  annual  volume  of  four  numbers  is 
$5.00  payable  in  advance.  All  sub¬ 
scriptions  begin  with  the  first  issue  of 
the  year  and  those  subscribing  later  in 
the  year  will  receive  the  back  issues  of 
the  volume. 


Back  volumes:  A  stock  of  back  volumes 
is  maintained  and  may  be  purchased  as 
follows:  3  to  date,  $5.00  ea.;  single 
numbers,  $1.25  each;  all  prices  postpaid. 
Missing  numbers:  Issues  lost  in  the  mail 
will  be  supplied  free  of  charge  if  no¬ 
tified  within  three  months  after  mailing. 


EDITORIAL  BOARD 


Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr.,  Ph.D. 

Department  of  Biology 
Catholic  University  of  America 

0.  L.  Cartwright 

U.  S.  National  Museum 
Washington  25,  D.  C. 

Eugene  J.  Gerberg,  Ph.D. 

Insect  Control  and  Research,  Inc. 
Baltimore,  Md. 


James  A.  Magner,  Ph.D.,  S.T.D. 

Business  Manager  of  the  Bulletin 
Catholic  University  of  America 

Theodore  J.  Spilman 

U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture 
Washington  25,  D.  C. 

Eileen  R.  Van  Tassell 

Department  of  Biology 
Catholic  University  of  America 


NOTICE  TO  AUTHORS 


Manuscripts  will  be  considered  ONLY 
FROM  SUBSCRIBERS.  Authors  should 
consult  STYLE  MANUAL  FOR  BIO¬ 
LOGICAL  JOURNALS,  prepared  by  the 
Committee  on  Form  and  Style  of  the  Con¬ 
ference  of  Biological  Editors,  and  pub¬ 
lished  by  the  American  Institute  of  Bio¬ 
logical  Sciences,  2000  P  Street,  N.W., 
Washington  6,  D.  C.  The  Bulletin  requires 
that  all  manuscripts  be  prepared  according 
to  instructions  in  the  Style  Manual.  Illus¬ 
trations  should  be  sent  mounted,  and 
numbered.  The  manuscript  should  be 
marked  to  indicate  the  location  of  text 
figures  or  the  position  of  full  page  plates. 

Manuscripts  will  be  acknowledged  upon 
receipt.  As  soon  as  possible  thereafter 
the  author  will  be  notified  as  to  accept¬ 
ance  after  review  by  the  Editorial  Board. 
If  the  manuscript  is  accepted,  a  tentative 
date  of  publication  will  be  set.  In  general, 


all  papers  will  be  published  in  their  order 
of  receipt,  but  the  editor  reserves  the 
right  to  use  articles  out  of  order  in  the 
interest  of  a  balanced  magazine. 

The  editor  will  make  no  text  changes 
without  advanced  notice  to  the  author. 
Galley  proof  will  be  sent  for  correction. 
These  galleys  are  sent  out  well  in  advance 
and  do  NOT  indicate  the  date  or  order 
of  publication. 

Twenty-five  tear  sheets  of  one  page 
notes  will  be  supplied  free  to  the  author  if 
requested  when  returning  galley  proofs. 
Reprints  of  articles  printed  free  of  extrane¬ 
ous  matter  will  be  supplied  with  or  with¬ 
out  covers  at  cost.  Reprints  MUST  be 
ordered  on  the  form  provided  when  re¬ 
turning  galley  proofs.  The  approximate 
cost  of  reprints  will  be  supplied  with  this 
form. 


EDITORIAL  POLICY 

Any  article,  note,  or  news  items  likely  cases,  descriptions  of  new  species  must  be 
to  be  of  interest  to  readers  of  the  Bulletin  illustrated.  Descriptions  of  new  species  or 
will  be  considered.  Articles  with  illustra-  genera  MUST  contain  keys  or  be  cor- 
tions  are  particularly  desired,  and  in  all  related  with  existing  keys. 


A  QUARTERLY  PUBLICATION  DEVOTED  TO  THE  STUDY  OF  BEETLES 


The  Coleopterists’  Bulletin 

Volume  18  September  (No.  3)  1964 


NOTES  ON  KARUMIIDAE  (COLEOPTERA) 

By  Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr.1 

The  family  Karumiidae  is  a  very  small  and  interesting  one  placed  near 
the  Drilidae  and  Lycidae  in  the  Cantharoidea.  The  presence  of  a  complete, 
unmodified  tenth  abdominal  tergum  (fig.  5)  seems  to  be  evidence  of  a  very 
primitive  condition.  All  other  beetles  have  the  tenth  tergum,  if  present  at 
all,  modified  as  a  part  of  the  copulatory  apparatus.  It  is  because  of  this 
structure  that  I  believe  that  this  family  is  perhaps  one  of  the  most  primitive 
groups  of  beetles. 


Figures  1  and  2,  Karumiidae.  1 — Karumia  estafilinoides  Escalera,  male.  2 — 
Drilocephalus  pallidipennis  Pic,  male. 


1  Department  of  Biology,  The  Catholic  University  of  America,  Washington.  D.  C. 


66 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


Eight  specimens  of  Karumia  estafilinoides  Escalera  were  identified  by  me 
in  a  lot  of  termites  sent  to  T.  E.  Snyder.  This  material  was  collected  in 
Afghanistan  by  the  third  Danish  Expedition  to  Central  Asia  at  Pirzada 
(30°,  37'  N  by  65°,  4'  E)  June  1948  (N.  Haarlpv,  coll.).  The  specimens 
are  deposited  in  the  United  States  National  Museum  collection.  The  type 
locality  of  this  species  is  Iran:  Kamenogra,  Karun  (sic)  River,  Zagros 
Mountains.  Two  of  the  other  five  members  of  the  family  are  also  Iranian. 
The  other  three  species  were  described  from  Argentina  and  Costa  Rica. 
The  specimens  from  Afghanistan  constitute  a  new  locality  record  for  the 
family  and  indicate  that  the  Karumiidae  may  have  or  may  have  had  a 
wider  distribution  than  previously  supposed. 

Because  of  the  fact  that  these  beetles  are  so  rare,  this  opportunity  is 
taken  to  describe  and  illustrate  the  family. 


Karumiidae 

The  very  fuzzy  appearance  and  rather  short  elytra  (entire  in  Drilocepha- 
lus),  large,  termite-like  head  and  jaws,  and  very  short  pronotum  charac¬ 
terize  the  members  of  this  family  (figs.  1  and  2). 

Description — Elongate,  subdepressed;  size  7-10  mm.  in  length;  color  pale  with 
darker  head,  termite-like  in  coloration;  vestiture  moderate  in  density,  but  very  long 
and  erect. 

Head  from  base  of  mandibles  to  thorax  twice  length  of  pronotum  in  some  species 
to  about  equal  in  length  in  others;  depressed;  prognathous;  surface  sparsely,  shallowly 
punctate.  Antennae  eleven-segmented,  moniliform,  inserted  above  the  base  of  the 
mandibles,  between  and  anterior  to  the  eyes.  Clypeus  hidden  beneath  the  frontal 
ridge;  labrum  distinct,  short  and  broad;  mandibles  very  large,  nearly  as  long  as 
head,  curved,  apices  acute  with  a  large  subapical  tooth,  or  entire;  maxillae  small, 
with  very  long,  slender  maxillary  palpi,  palpus  four-segmented,  last  segment  only 
slightly  expanded  apically;  labium  very  broad  and  short  at  base;  gula  present;  labial 
palpus  four-segmented,  very  long,  filiform.  Eyes  lateral,  small,  somewhat  bulging, 
oval. 

Pronotum  very  short  and  broad,  anterior  margin  sinuate,  lateral  margins  curved, 
somewhat  narrower  posteriorly  in  some,  as  broad  as  anterior  margin  in  others; 
posterior  margin  arcuate  to  straight,  surface  nearly  smooth  to  finely  punctate. 
Prosternum  short  and  broad,  subarcuate  posteriorly,  not  separating  coxae;  procoxal 
cavities  open  behind;  mesosternum  very  short;  mesocoxal  cavities  open  behind, 
metasternum  long  and  broad.  Legs  moderate  in  length;  tarsal  formula  5-5-5,  or 
5-5-4,  first  segment  elongate;  claws  moderate;  apical  tibial  spurs  long,  prominent; 
numerous  shorter  spurs  on  the  tibia  in  addition  to  long  hairs;  scutellum  moderate, 
trapezoidal  or  shield-shaped;  elytra  short  or  entire,  somewhat  narrowed  behind, 
striae  absent;  slight  epipleural  fold  present;  wing  venation  and  folding  pattern  un¬ 
described.  The  wings  are  folded  length-wise  only  and  are  not  folded  cross-wise. 

Abdomen  with  eight  visible  sterna,  sutures  distinct,  surface  smooth;  ten  visible 
terga  (fig.  5),  the  tenth  tergum  entire,  not  a  part  of  the  copulatory  mechanism. 

Male  genitalia  of  the  trilobed  type  (figs.  3  and  4)  with  a  large  basal  piece  and 
articulated  parameres;  penis  large,  compressed. 

Females  and  immature  stages  unknown. 

Ecology. — Known  to  inhabit  termite  nests. 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


67 


Figures  3-5,  Karumia  estafilinoides  Escalera.  3 — Male  genitalia,  ventral  view.  4 — 
Penis  lateral  view,  dorsal  surface  to  the  right.  5 — Abdominal  terga  showing  the  ten 
terga.  The  dotted  line  at  the  extreme  right  indicates  the  membranous  area  in  which 
the  anus  is  located. 

Key  to  the  Species 

1.  Mandibles  entire - ESCALERINA  MICROCEPHALA  (Escalera) 


Mandibles  with  subapical  tooth -  2 

2.  Elytra  much  shorter  than  apex  of  abdomen -  3 

Elytra  as  long  as  abdomen -  4 

3.  Head  very  large,  longer  than  broad,  more  than  twice  length  of  pronotum -  5 

Head  moderate,  about  as  long  as  pronotum  (?,  specimens  not  seen) - 


- PSEUDOKARUMIA  ANGUSTATA  Pic 

4.  Piceous;  eyes  small,  length  of  head  behind  eyes  about  three  times  width  of  eye-- 

- DRILOCEPHALUS  ILIARENSIS  Bruch 

Testaceous;  eyes  large,  length  of  head  behind  eyes  subequal  to  width  of  eyes - 

- DRILOCEPHALUS  PALLIDIPENNIS  Pic 

5.  Elytra  long,  reaching  to  about  one-half  length  of  abdomen  - 

- KARUMIA  ESTAFILINOIDES  Escalera 

Elytra  short,  hardly  extending  beyond  base  of  abdominal  sternum - 

KARUMIA  STAPHYLINUS  Semenov  and  Martynov 

Classification 

Karumiidae  Escalera,  1913.  Bol.  Soc.  Esp.  Hist.  Nat.  13:320. 
Zarudniolidae  Semenov  and  Martynov,  1925,  Rev.  Russe  d’Ent.  19:74. 

Escalerina  Bolivar 

Escalerina  Bolivar,  1926.  Eos,  2:196,  199. 

Karumia  microcephala  Escalera,  1913.  Bol.  Soc.  Esp.  Hist.  Nat.  13:322 
(Iran).  (Placed  in  Escalerina  by  Bolivar,  1926,  Eos  2:199.) 


68 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


Karumia  Escalera 

Karumia  Escalera,  1913.  Bol.  Soc.  Esp.  Hist.  Nat.  13:320. 

Zarudniola  Semenov  and  Martynov,  1925.  Rev.  Russe  d’Ent.  19:74,  77. 
(Placed  in  synonymy  by  Bolivar,  1926,  Eos  2:196.) 

Karumia  estafilinoides  Escalera,  1913.  Bol.  Soc.  Esp.  Hist.  Nat.  13:320 
(Iran  and  Afghanistan). 

Karumia  staphylinus  Semenov  and  Martynov,  1925.  Rev.  Russe  d’Ent. 
19:74,  77,  fig.  1  (Iran). 


Drilocephalus  Pic 

Drilocephalus  Pic,  1918.  Mel.  Exot.-Ent.  28:3. 

Drilocephalus  pallidipennis  Pic,  1918.  Mel.  Exot.-Ent.  28:3  (Argen¬ 
tina). 

Drilocephalus  iliarensis  Bruch,  1930.  Rev.  Soc.  Ent.  Argentina  3:35 
(Argentina) . 


Pseudokarumia  Pic 

p 

Pseudokarumia  Pic,  1931.  Malcoderma  exotiques,  Echange,  47,  no.  443, 
hors-texte:  95-96. 

p 

Pseudokarumia  angustata  Pic,  1931.  Malcoderma  exotiques,  Echange, 
47,  no.  443,  hors-texte:  96  (Costa  Rica). 


1  * 


LITERATURE  NOTICE 

PALEOZOISKIE  NASEKOMYE  KUZNETSKOGO  BASSEINA.  by  B.  B.  Rohden- 
dorf,  E.  E.  Becker-Migdisova,  O.  M.  Martynova,  and  A.  G.  Sharov.  Trudy  Paleon- 
tologischeskogo  Instituta,  Akademia  Nauk  SSSR,  Vol.  85,  pp.  1-705,  illus.  1961. — This 
work  on  the  paleozoic  insects  of  the  Kuznetsk  coal  fields  of  the  USSR  contains 
many  new  taxa.  Keys  to  all  taxa  are  presented,  and  each  species  is  illustrated;  at 
least,  the  elytron  of  each  beetle  is  illustrated.  Rohdendorf,  author  of  the  beetle  sec¬ 
tion,  describes  the  following  new  beetle  families:  Asiocoleidae,  Kaltanocoleidae, 
Taldycupidae,  Rhombocoleidae,  and  Schizocoleidae.  In  addition,  the  previously  de¬ 
scribed  families  Cupidae  and  Permosynidae  are  included.  These  7  families  contain 
37  genera  (34  new)  and  74  species  (all  new). 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


69 


NOTES  ON  ENOCHRUS  AND  CYMBIODYTA 
FROM  THE  PACIFIC  NORTHWEST 
(COLEOPTERA:  HYDROPHILIDAE)1 

By  David  C.  Miller2 

The  following  information  is  presented  in  order  to  make  the  names  of 
the  new  species  and  the  synonymy  for  certain  older  species  available  for 
use  in  the  section  on  the  Hydrophilidae  in  the  forthcoming  Part  V  of  Dr. 
M.  H.  Hatch's  Beetles  of  the  Pacific  Northwest. 

Thanks  are  due  to  the  following  individuals  for  the  loan  of  material  of 
the  new  species  for  study.  The  abbreviations  in  parentheses  are  those  used 
after  the  locality  listings  to  indicate  the  site  of  deposition  of  the  type  ma¬ 
terial.  This  is  generally  equivalent  to  the  original  source  from  which  it  was 
borrowed.  The  author’s  collection  is  referred  to  as  (DM).  Mr.  H.  S.  Dybas, 
Chicago  Natural  History  Museum  (CNHM);  Mr.  J.  J.  Davis,  Hanford, 
Washington  (JJD);  Mr.  Joe  Schuh,  Klamath  Falls,  Oregon  (JS);  Mr. 
Joseph  Capizzi,  Oregon  Department  of  Agriculture  (ODA);  Mr.  Jack 
Lattin,  Oregon  State  University  (OSU);  Mr.  S.  G.  Jewett,  Portland, 
Oregon  (SGJ);  Dr.  M.  H.  Hatch,  University  of  Washington  (UW). 

Dr.  P.  J.  Darlington  of  the  Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology,  Harvard 
University,  Mr.  J.  A.  G.  Rehn  of  the  Philadelphia  Academy  of  Sciences, 
and  Mr.  W.  J.  Brown  of  the  Canadian  National  Collection  have  been 
most  kind  in  allowing  me  to  examine  types.  Mr.  Ralph  W.  Gundersen  of 
the  University  of  Minnesota,  and  Mr.  Hugh  B.  Leech  of  the  California 
Academy  of  Sciences  have  read  the  manuscript.  Dr.  M.  H.  Hatch  has 
aided  in  many  ways  with  the  portions  of  the  work  completed  while  I  was 
at  the  University  of  Washington.  The  drawings  are  by  Mrs.  Helen  Houk, 
of  the  University  of  Washington. 


The  Genus  Enochrus 
Enochrt/s  ( Enochrus )  carinatus  (LeConte) 

Philhydrus  carinatus  LeConte  1855:370. 

P.  j  uc  at  us  Horn  1873:127;  1890:242-243.  [NEW  SYNONYMY.] 

Enochrus  fucatus:  Winters  1927:19.  Leech  and  Chandler  1956:345. 

For  some  time,  Enochrus  carinatus  (LeC.)  and  E.  fucatus  (Horn) 
have  been  thought  to  be  separable  by  the  coloration  of  the  pronotum  and 
elytra.  Winters  (1927)  stated  that  carinatus  is  uniformly  dark  dorsally, 
except  for  the  front  angles  of  the  pronotum,  while  fucatus  has  the  pro¬ 
notum  and  elytra  decidedly  paler  than  the  head.  Leech  and  Chandler 


1  The  majority  of  this  work  was  included  in  a  dissertation  submitted  to  the  Uni¬ 
versity  of  Washington  in  partial  fulfillment  of  the  requirements  for  the  degree  of 
Doctor  of  Philosophy. 

-  Department  of  Biology,  City  College  of  New  York,  New  York,  N.  Y. 


70 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


(1956)  repeated  this  distinction.  However,  I  have  examined  the  two 
cotypes  of  carinatus  LeC.  in  the  Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology,  Har¬ 
vard,  the  type  of  jucatus  Horn  in  the  same  institution,  and  the  type  of 
fucatus  in  the  Philadelphia  Academy  of  Sciences;  all  four  of  these  specimens 
have  the  elytra  and  pronotum  decidedly  paler  than  the  head.  The  elytra 
and  pronotum  vary  from  light  reddish  brown  to  nearly  yellow  in  these 
four  specimens,  but  all  appear  to  me  to  belong  to  one  species.  Thus  fucatus 
Horn  is  a  synonym  of  carinatus  LeC.  The  types  of  carinatus  LeC.  were 
collected  in  California  and  those  of  fucatus  Horn  were  collected  in  Utah. 

This  leaves  the  form  which  Winters  called  carinatus  LeC.  without  a 
name,  and  it  is  given  the  name  piceus  Miller,  new  species,  below.  The 
problem,  however,  goes  further.  It  is  difficult  to  decide  whether  some 
specimens  are  carinatus  LeC.  or  piceus  Miller,  new  species.  This  is  par¬ 
ticularly  true  of  some  material  which  I  have  seen  from  Oregon,  where 
both  forms  are  present.  It  is  possible  that  they  are  variants  of  a  single 
species,  though  the  presence  of  piceus  throughout  most  of  the  range  of 
carinatus  argues  against  considering  the  forms  to  be  subspecies.  On  the 
other  hand,  the  very  small  amount  of  material  of  carinatus  that  I  have 
seen  from  the  southwestern  United  States  is  quite  variable  in  color,  puncta- 
tion,  and  the  form  of  the  prosternal  carina,  so  that  it  is  possible  that  more 
than  one  species  is  represented  in  that  area.  More  study,  particularly  of 
these  southern  forms,  is  needed. 

Enochrus  ( Enochrus )  piceus  Miller,  NEW  SPECIES 

Philhydrus  carinatus:  Horn  1873:126-127;  1890:242-244  (nec  LeConte). 

Enochrus  carinatus:  Winters  ( nec  LeConte)  1927:19.  Leech  and  Chandler 
1956:345. 

This  is  the  darker  of  the  two  forms  discussed  above;  the  dorsal  surface 
is  nearly  uniformly  dark  and  the  front  angles  of  the  pronotum  are  pale.  As 
the  synonymy  above  leaves  this  form  without  a  name  it  is  given  one  here, 
and  type  material  is  designated. 

HOLOTYPE:  Male,  Wilbur,  Washington,  Aug.  24,  1932  (UW). 

ALLOTYPE:  Female,  same  data  as  holotype  (UW). 

PARATYPES:  Washington:  Benton  Co.:  1,  Hanford  (JJD).  Douglas 
Co.:  2,  Grand  Coulee  (Dry  Falls)  (UW).  King  Co.:  1,  Snoqualmie  (UW). 
Kittitas  Co.:  1,  Cle  Elum  (UW);  1  Kittitas  (UW).  Lincoln  Co.:  10,  Wil¬ 
bur  (8  UW,  2  DM).  Pacific  Co.:  1,  Nasel  River  (UW).  Spokane  Co.:  1, 
Spokane  (UW).  Walla  Walla  Co.:  1,  Wallula  (UW).  Idaho:  Franklin  Co.: 
1,  Bear  River  Canyon  (UW).  Canyon  Co.:  4,  Lowell  Lake  (UW). 
Oregon:  Baker  Co.:  2,  Durkee  (Powell  Creek)  (UW);  2,  Snake  River 
(Farewell  Bend)  (UW).  Benton  Co.:  1,  Alsea  Mountain  (OSU);  1, 
Corvallis  (OSU).  Clackamas  Co.:  14,  Austin  Hot  Springs  (10  SGJ,  2  UW, 
2  DM).  Coos  Co.:  1,  Myrtlewood  Camp  (Myrtle  Creek)  (OSU).  Curry 
Co.:  6,  Brookings  (Myrtle  Grove,  Chetco  River)  (3  OSU,  2  UW,  1  DM); 
23,  Pistol  River  (9  CNHM,  11  UW,  2  DM,  1  OSU);  3,  Port  Orford  (2 
CNHM,  1  UW).  Deschutes  Co.:  1,  Sisters  (OSU).  Douglas  Co.:  3,  Rose- 
burg  (UW).  Jackson  Co.:  2,  Dead  Indian  Springs  (JS).  Jefferson  Co.:  1, 


1964  THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN  71 

Spring  Creek  (OSU).  Josephine  Co.:  2,  Wolf  Creek  (UW).  Linn  Co.:  1, 
Santiam  River  (Lebanon)  (SGJ).  Umatilla  Co.:  2,  Echo  (UW);  1,  Free¬ 
water  (OSU).  Wallowa  Co.:  1,  Wallowa  River  (UW).  California:  Los 
Angeles  Co.:  2,  Taipa  Park  (Santa  Monica  Mountains)  (DM).  San  Diego 
Co.:  2,  Vista  (DM).  Santa  Cruz  Co.:  4,  Ben  Lomond  (DM).  Siskiyou  Co.: 
1,  Hilts  (Cottonwood  Creek)  (SGJ). 

Enochrus  (Lumet us)  collinus  Brown 
Enochrus  collinus  Brown  1931:118. 

This  species  is  not  common  and  is  very  similar  to  E.  conjunctus  (Fall) 
and  related  species.  The  material  that  1  have  seen  from  British  Columbia 
(Copper  Mt.  and  Quesnel)  and  Idaho  (Malad  City,  Little  Malad  River) 
agrees  with  the  type,  in  the  Canadian  National  Collection.  Collinus  is 
generally  somewhat  darker  than  conjunctus ,  and  males  of  the  two  species 
can  be  separated  on  the  structural  characters  given  in  the  key  to  follow. 

Enochrus  ( Lumetus )  conjunctus  (Fall) 

Philhydrus  conjunctus  Fall  1901 : 2 1 7. 

Enochrus  conjunctus:  Brues  1932:267.  Leech  and  Chandler  1956:345. 

Malkin  1958:34. 

The  only  difference  between  conjunctus,  horni  Leech,  and  a  form 
labeled  in  some  collections  “ lividus  Walker”  is  in  color.  The  male 
genitalia  and  all  other  structural  characters  are  identical  in  all  three  forms. 
Since  intergrades  exist,  it  is  entirely  possible  that  all  three  are  color 
variants  of  a  single  species.  In  any  case  the  name  lividus  Walker  is  not 
usable  because  it  is  based  on  a  misidentification.  Walker  (1866:310-319) 
wrongly  identified  material  from  British  Columbia  as  Philhydrus  lividus 
Forster,  a  European  species.  The  latter  is  now  the  type  of  the  genus 
Helochares  Mulsant. 

An  extensive  study  of  material  from  the  entire  range  of  the  complex 
should  be  undertaken  to  determine  how  many  species  are  involved.  Here, 
I  will  tentatively  consider  that  there  are  two.  Conjunctus  Fall  should  in¬ 
clude  those  specimens  which  are  primarily  dark  dorsally  with  the  sides  of 
the  head  and  the  pronotum  variably  paler;  horni  Leech  should  include 
those  specimens  which  are  primarily  yellowish  dorsally  with  the  base  of 
the  head  and  the  pronotal  disc  generally  dark,  but  sometimes  pale.  Walker’s 
identification  of  lividus  was  probably  based  on  material  of  this  latter  group 
in  which  the  pronotum  was  entirely  pale. 


Enochrus  (Lumetus)  diffusus  (LeConte) 

Philhydrus  diffusus  LeConte  1855:371  (in  part). 

Enochrus  diffusus:  Leech  1948:450;  1950:254-256.  Leech  and  Chandler 
1956:345. 

Leech  (1950:254-256)  was  the  first  to  point  out  the  distinguishing 
characters  of  the  metafemora  and  clypeus  of  this  species.  The  male  gen- 


72 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


italia  are  also  distinctive,  having  an  elongate  supporting  strut  for  the 
median  lobe  as  noted  in  the  key  below.  This  strut  is  shorter  in  the  con- 
junctus-horni  group.  The  Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology,  Harvard,  con¬ 
tains  a  series  of  four  cotypes  of  diffusus  LeC.  Only  the  fourth  of  these 
agrees  with  diffusus  as  now  recognized,  while  the  other  three  belong  to 
an  unknown  species,  perhaps  the  ‘’livid”  form  of  horni  Leech  as  recognized 
here  (see  discussion  under  E.  (L.)  conjunctus  (Fall)).  For  this  reason  I 
have  designated  cotype  #4  as  the  lectotype  for  the  species  diffusus  LeC. 


Enochrus  ( Methydrus )  lacustris  (LeConte) 

Philhydrus  lacustris  LeConte  1855:369.  Fall  1924:87. 

The  material  which  I  have  tentatively  referred  to  this  species  is  from  bog 
lakes  near  Seattle,  Washington,  particularly  from  Chase  Lake.  There  does 
not  appear  to  be  any  appreciable  difference  between  this  material  and 
LeConte’s  type  (in  the  Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology,  Harvard),  but 
lacustris  is  a  member  of  a  difficult  complex  which  is  in  need  of  additional 
study  before  identifications  can  be  made  with  certainty. 


Key  to  the  Enochrus  of  the  Pacific  Coast 

From  Leech  and  Chandler  (1956:345)  with  additions  and  alterations. 
This  key  includes  all  known  species  of  Enochrus  from  California,  Oregon, 
Idaho,  Washington,  and  British  Columbia. 

1.  Fifth  abdominal  sternite  with  a  small  apical  emargination,  from  which  projects  a 


differentiated  fringe  of  golden  cilia - 

Fifth  abdominal  sternite  entire  apical ly,  not  emarginate,  without  differentiated  fringe 

of  flat  cilia  (subgenus  Lumetus  Zaitz.) -  9 

2.  Last  two  segments  of  maxillary  palpi  of  equal  length,  or  last  longer  than  penultimate 

(subgenus  Enochrus  s.  str.) -  3 

Last  segment  of  maxillary  palpi  shorter  than  penultimate  (subgenus  Methydrus  Rey)  5 


3.  Flead  luteous  in  front  of  eyes,  elsewhere  black;  prosternum  not  carinate;  smaller 

species,  3.5-4  mm.  long;  pronotum  black,  sides  and  parts  of  anterior  and  posterior 

margins  luteous;  California  to  Oregon - CUSPIDATUS  (LeC.) 

Head  entirely  black,  or  vaguely  narrowly  rufopiceous  in  front  of  eyes;  prosternum 

with  a  low  poorly  defined  median  longitudinal  carina;  larger  species,  4-5  mm.  long  4 

4.  Dorsal  surface  black  to  dark  reddish  brown,  front  angles  of  pronotum  usually  paler; 

southwestern  U.  S.  to  Washington,  Idaho - PICEUS  Miller 

Head  black  dorsal  ly,  pronotum  and  elytra  reddish  brown  to  yellow;  Oregon  and 

southwestern  Idaho  to  southwest  U.  S. - CARINATUS  (LeC.) 

5.  Prosternum  not  carinate -  6 

Prosternum  carinate;  smaller  species,  2.75-3.75  mm.  long;  mesosternal  protuberance 

laminiform,  acutely  prominent  anteriorly,  not  at  all  obscured  by  vestiture -  7 

6.  Smaller  species,  3. 0-3. 7  mm.  long,  mesosternal  protuberance  quite  low,  lamelliform, 

glabrous,  not  toothed;  emargination  of  fifth  abdominal  sternite  small,  acute; 

western  Washington,  bog  lakes - ?  LACUSTRIS  (LeC.) 

Larger  species,  4. 5-5. 8  mm.  long;  mesosternal  carina  higher,  hairy,  bearing  low, 
rounded  teeth  obscured  by  the  pubescence;  emargination  of  fifth  abdominal  sternite 
fairly  large,  rounded;  California  to  British  Columbia - CALIFORNICUS  (Horn) 

7.  Pronotum  piceous  on  disc -  8 

Pronotum  entirely  testaceous;  elytra  polished,  minutely  punctate,  except  for  several 

more  or  less  evident  longitudinal  series  of  coarser  punctures;  southwestern  U.  S. 

- PECTORALIS  (LeC.) 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


73 


9. 


10. 


11. 


12. 


13. 


14. 


10 


11 


Elytra  extremely  finely,  sparsely  punctate,  except  for  serial  punctures  which  stand 
out  contrastingly;  pronotum  usually  broadly  piceous,  elytra  tinged  with  piceous; 

narrower  species;  San  Diego  County,  Calif. - CRISTATUS  (LeC.) 

Elytra  rather  densely,  moderately  coarsely  punctate,  serial  punctures  not  conspicuous; 
pronotum  usually  piceous  only  at  middle  of  disc,  elytra  not  tinged  with 

piceous;  broader  species;  California  to  Oregon  to  Utah - OBTUSIUSCULUS  (Mots.) 

Dorsal  surface  dark  reddish  brown  to  black,  elytra  and  pronotal  disc  usually  equally 

dark,  head  before  the  eyes  and  edges  of  pronotum  often  paler - 

Dorsal  surface  yellow  to  dark  brown  except  for  black  areas  on  head  and  sometimes 
on  pronotal  disc  - 

Dorsal  surface  usually  black,  pronotum  at  most  narrowly  and  indistinctly  paler  at 
sides,  head  not  pale  before  eyes;  hind  angles  of  pronotum  sharp,  nearly  rect¬ 
angular;  males  with  tooth  of  outer  protarsal  claw  large  but  not  so  strongly 
everted,  extending  only  about  half  way  to  tip  of  claw;  external  supporting  strut 
of  median  lobe  of  aedeagus  in  ventral  view  extending  beyond  apex  of  median  lobe 
a  distance  at  least  equal  to  width  of  median  lobe;  British  Columbia,  Idaho -- 

.  -  COLLINUS  Brown 

Dot  sal  surface  dark  reddish  brown,  head  often  pale  before  eyes  and  pronotum 
narrowly  to  broadly  pale  at  sides;  hind  angles  of  pronotum  more  broadly  rounded; 
males  with  tooth  of  outer  protarsal  claw  larger  and  fairly  strongly  everted,  reach¬ 
ing  about  two-thirds  of  the  way  to  tip  of  claw;  external  supporting  strut  of 
median  lobe  of  aedeagus  extending  only  slightly  if  at  all  beyond  apex  of  median 

lobe;  California  to  British  Columbia - CONJUNCTUS  (Fall) 

Front  margin  of  clypeus  evenly  arcuate-emarginate,  without  trace  of  a  secondary 
emargination  at  middle;  species  occurring  in  brackish  or  saline  water  along  sea- 

coast,  near  lower  Colorado  River,  and  in  Death  Valley,  Calif. - 

Emargination  of  front  of  clypeus  with  a  secondary  emargination  at  middle,  exposing 
a  preclypeus  - 

Elytra  more  coarsely  punctate;  salt  marsh  and  saline  pools,  coast  of  California  and 

up  estuary  of  Colorado  River - HAMILTONI  PACIFICUS  Leech 

Elytra  more  finely  punctate;  saline  waters,  Death  Valley,  Calif.  HAMILTONI  PYRETUS  Leech 
Smaller  species,  3. 5-4. 5  mm.  long;  hind  edge  of  hind  femora  simple;  Central  Valley 

of  California - ?  LATIUSCULUS  (Mots.) 

Larger  species,  4. 4-6.5  mm.  long -  14 

Secondary  emargination  at  front  of  clypeus  arcuate,  exposing  a  preclypeus;  hind  edge 
of  hind  femora  simple;  dorsal  surface  pale  to  dark  brown,  base  of  head  black  and 
pronotal  disc  completely  pale  to  strongly  black;  external  supporting  strut  of  median 
lobe  of  aedeagus  extending  little  if  at  all  beyond  apex  of  median  lobe;  southern 

British  Columbia  to  Oregon,  Idaho - - - HORNI  Leech 

Secondary  emargination  at  front  of  clypeus  truncate,  exposing  a  preclypeus;  hind 
edge  of  hind  femora  of  male  with  a  slightly  raised  and  pronounced  area  at  middle; 
dorsal  surface  yellow  to  pale  brown,  at  most  slightly  darkened  (never  black)  on 
pronotal  disc  and  base  of  head;  external  supporting  strut  of  median  lobe  of 
aedeagus  extending  beyond  apex  of  median  lobe  a  distance  equal  to  nearly  twice 
width  of  median  lobe  in  ventral  view;  southern  British  Columbia  to  California,  east 
of  Cascade  Range  - DIFFUSUS  (LeC.) 


12 


13 


The  Genus  Cymbiodyta 

Cymbiodyta  acuminata  Fall 
(Figs.  1,  3) 

Cymbiodyta  acuminata  Fall  1924:87. 

The  type  of  this  species  is  missing  from  the  Fall  Collection  in  the 
Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology,  Harvard,  but  material  from  British 
Columbia  (Agassiz;  Copper  Mt.;  Vernon;  and  Wynndel)  and  Washing¬ 
ton  (Dry  Falls,  Grand  Coulee;  Millersylvania  State  Pk.)  agrees  with  topo- 
typical  specimens  in  that  collection. 


74 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


Cymbiodyta  hatchi  n.  sp.,  Aedeagus,  dorsal  view. 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


75 


Cymbiodyta  leechi  Miller,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  2,  4) 

MALE:  Length  4.5-5. 1  mm.;  form  elongate  oval;  dorsal  surface  entirely  finely  and 
very  thickly  punctate,  about  evenly  so  on  all  areas,  and  shining  black  except  the 
anterior  margin  of  the  labrum,  the  anterior  (very  narrowly)  and  lateral  margins  of 
the  pronotum,  and  the  elytral  margins  and  apex  which  are  dark  yellowish  brown; 
pronotum  with  a  very  irregular  row  of  larger  punctures  extending  inward  from  the 
margin  on  each  side  and  a  more  regular  row  posterior  to  this  on  each  side,  and  the 
elytra  with  a  very  few  larger  punctures  in  very  inexact  longitudinal  rows;  side  margins 
of  the  pronotum  slightly  bowed  outwards,  the  front  corners  very  broadly  and 
evenly  rounded,  the  hind  corners  more  sharply  rounded,  forming  an  obtuse  angle; 
venter  black,  except  the  meso-and  metacoxae  and  trochanters,  alf  the  legs  from  7he 
tips  of  the  femora  apically,  and  the  antennal  club,  which  are  dark  yellowish  brown, 
the  palpi  and  the  remainder  of  the  antennae  lighter  and  more  yellowish;  aedeagus 
m  dorsal  view  with  parameres  broad,  their  tips  bent  toward  each  other  (i.e.  oiTter 
margin  of  each  paramere  a  smooth  curve,  but  inner  margins  bending  sharply  towards 
each  other  near  apex);  mesosternal  ridge  bearing  a  large  median  tooth  as  in  C 
acuminata  Fall. 

FEMALE:  Externally  identical  to  male. 

HOLOTYPE:  Male,  Chase  Lake,  Snohomish  Co.,  Washington  Mav  5 
1949,  M.  H.  Hatch  (UW). 

ALLOTYPE:  Female,  same  data  as  holotype  (UW). 

PARATYPES:  Washington:  King  Co.:  1,  Echo  Lake  (UW)-  17 
Juanita  (15  UW,  2  DM);  2,  Lake  Marie  (UW);  1  Renton  (Cedar  River) 
(UW);  4,  Seattle  (UW);  1,  Seattle  (Green  Lake)  (UW);  3,  Seattle  (Lake 
Washington)  (UW).  Snohomish  Co.:  64,  Chase  Lake  (60  UW,  4  DM); 
6,  Scribner  Lake  (5  UW,  1  DM).  Thurston  Co.:  1,  Lost  Lake  (UW);  2, 
Tumwater  (UW).  Oregon:  Jackson  Co.:  1,  Dead  Indian  Soda  Springs 
(ODA).  Klamath  Co.:  3,  Mare’s  Egg  Spring  (2  JS,  1  DM).  Yamhill  Co.: 
1,  Dayton  (UW). 

This  species  is  quite  close  to  C.  acuminata  Fall,  which  is  the  only  other 
North  American  Cymbiodyta  with  a  strongly  developed  tooth  on  the 
mesosternum.  Leechi  differs  from  acuminata  in  the  following  ways:  hind 
angles  of  pronotum  more  obtuse  and  sides  of  pronotum  more  arcuate; 
maxillary  palpi  more  robust  and  usually  more  yellowish;  mesosternal  tooth 
slightly  shorter;  parameres  convergent  at  the  tips. 

It  gives  me  great  pleasure  to  name  this  species  in  honor  of  Mr.  Hugh 
B.  Leech,  of  the  California  Academy  of  Sciences.  Mr.  Leech’s  many  pub¬ 
lications  on  the  Hydrophilidae  have  added  greatly  to  our  knowledge  of  the 
family,  and  he  has  been  of  great  help  to  me  in  my  work  on  the  north¬ 
western  species. 


Cymbiodyta  vindicata  Fall 
(Fig.  5) 

Cymbiodyta  vindicata  Fall  1924:86-87. 

As  with  C.  acuminata  Fall,  the  type  of  this  species  is  missing  from  the 
Fall  Collection  in  the  Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology,  Harvard.  Topo- 
typical  specimens  in  that  collection  agree  with  material  from  British  Colum¬ 
bia  (several  localities)  and  Washington  (Lake  Thomas,  Snohomish  Co.) 


76 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


Cymbiodyta  hat  chi  Miller,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Fig.  6) 

MALE:  Length  5.1  mm.,  form  oval;  head  black;  pronotum  and  elytra  dark  brown, 
with  the  pronotum  narrowly  paler  laterally  and  the  elytra  narrowly  paler  laterally 
and  much  more  broadly  and  diffusely  paler  apically;  entire  dorsum  finely  and 
thickly  punctate;  in  addition  to  the  fine  punctation  with  two  rows  of  coarser  punctures 
on  each  side  of  the  pronotum,  slanting  posterio-laterally  and  very  irregular  and  in¬ 
complete,  and  occasional  coarser  punctures  on  the  elytra,  especially  laterally  where 
they  are  very  irregular  in  arrangement,  the  few  coarse  punctures  of  the  disc  arranged 
in  longitudinal  series  but  so  far  apart  that  the  series  are  not  evident;  venter  largely 
black,  the  legs  apical  to  the  femoral  pubescence  brown,  the  palpi  very  dark  brown; 
mesosternal  ridge  transverse,  not  toothed;  aedeagus  in  dorsal  view  with  the  inner 
margin  of  each  paramere  straight,  the  outer  margin  curving  gradually  inward  from 
the  base  to  near  the  apex  and  then  bent  outward  to  nearly  parallel  the  inner  margin 
so  that  the  tip  is  elongate  along  its  inner  margin,  the  extreme  apex  of  the  paramere 
bluntly  rounded. 

FEMALE:  Unknown. 

HOLOTYPE:  Male,  13  mi.  N.E.  Bly,  edge  Deming  Cr.,  Klamath  Co., 
Oregon,  Sept.  16,  1960,  Joe  Schuh  (JS). 

The  holotype  is  the  only  known  specimen.  This  species  is  named  in 
honor  of  Dr.  M.  H.  Hatch,  of  the  University  of  Washington,  who  originally 
stimulated  my  interest  in  the  Hydrophilidae  and  who  has  aided  me  im¬ 
measurably  during  the  course  of  my  work  with  the  northwestern  species. 
Hatchi  is  very  close  to  C.  vindicate  Fall  and  the  eastern  C.  fimbriata 
(Melsh.),  but  can  be  distinguished  from  either  by  its  prolonged  apex  of  the 
parameres.  The  dark  brown  palpi  of  the  holotype  may  also  prove  to  be 
diagnostic  when  other  specimens  are  known. 


Key  to  the  Cymbiodyta  of  the  Pacific  Coast 

From  Leech  and  Chandler  (1956:345)  with  additions  and  alterations. 
This  key  includes  all  known  species  of  Cymbiodyta  from  California, 
Oregon,  Idaho,  Washington,  and  British  Columbia. 


1.  Elytra  with  striae  or  serial  large  punctures  evident  in  at  least  the  apical  quarter; 

mesosternal  protuberance  entirely  transverse,  never  with  a  tooth - 

Elytra  with  no  striae  (except  the  sutural  ones)  or  evident  rows  of  coarse  punctures; 

pronotum  and  elytra  black  to  dark  reddish  brown  discally,  pale  marginally -  5 

2.  Elytra  with  sutural  striae  at  least  in  apical  half,  but  elsewhere  at  most  with  serial 

punctures  not  impressed  as  striae;  head  entirely  black -  3 


Elytra  with  distinct  striae  in  addition  to  sutural;  head  pale  before  eyes;  form 

broad;  all  rows  of  punctures  entire,  including  scutellar  row;  California - 

_ PUNCTATOSTRIATUS  (Horn) 

3.  Metafemora  pubescent  in  slightly  less  than  basal  two-thirds;  maxillary  palpi  short 

and  stout,  yellow;  dorsal  surface  black  to  dark  reddish  brown,  the  margins  paler; 
elytra  with  serial  punctures  forming  at  least  three  nearly  complete  rows  laterally, 
the  discal  rows  complete  only  in  about  the  apical  quarter;  California  to  British 

Columbia  - DORSALIS  (Mots.) 

Metafemora  pubescent  in  basal  three-quarters;  maxillary  palpi  longer  and  more 
slender;  elytra  with  lateral  series  of  punctures  usually  traceable  to  near  base,  but 
discal  series  traceable  only  near  apex -  4 

4.  Pronotum  and  elytra  usually  reddish  brown  to  black,  the  margins  paler;  elytra  with 

serial  punctures  more  confused,  not  traceable  as  striae  as  far  anteriorly  as  in 
the  following  species,  the  discal  striae  especially  usually  visible  only  at  apex; 
maxillary  palpi  usually  brownish;  California  to  British  Columbia - PACIFICA  Leech 


1964  THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN  77 

Pronotum  and  elytra  usually  yellowish  brown  to  dark  brown,  disc  of  pronotum  black; 
elytra  with  serial  punctures  somewhat  more  evident  and  less  confused  with  larger 
punctures  of  intervals;  maxillary  palpi  usually  yellowish;  California  to  Oregon-- 
- IMBELLIS  (LeC.) 


5.  Mesosternal  protuberance  bearing  a  large  median  tooth -  6 

Mesosternal  protuberance  without  a  large  median  tooth - - -  7 


6.  Hind  angles  of  pronotum  nearly  rectangular;  sides  of  pronotum  nearly  straight  in 

posterior  three-quarters,  bending  in  gradually  in  anterior  quarter;  maxillary  palpi 
more  slender,  yellowish  brown  (fig.  1);  mesosternal  tooth  longer;  aedeagus  with 
parameres  nearly  triangular  in  shape,  not  converging  at  tip,  inner  margin  nearly 
straight  (fig.  3);  form  slightly  less  robust;  Washington,  S.  British  Columbia  - 

- ACUMINATA  Fall 

Hind  angles  of  pronotum  more  obtuse,  sides  of  pronotum  more  broadly  arcuate; 

maxillary  palpi  more  robust,  yellow  (fig.  2);  mesosternal  tooth  slightly  shorter; 
aedeagus  with  parameres  bent  slightly  towards  each  other  at  tips,  inner  margin 
of  each  paramere  strongly  sinuate  (fig.  4);  form  slightly  more  robust;  Washington, 

Oregon - LEECHI  Miller 

7.  Smaller  species,  more  parallel  sided,  length  3. 4-4.0  mm.;  palpi  yellow,  slender; 

aedeagus  with  outer  margin  of  each  paramere  curving  inward  to  about  2/7  of 
the  distance  from  tip,  then  bent  outward  to  parallel  inner  margin,  so  that 

parameres  diverge  from  that  point  apically;  British  Columbia,  Washington,  Idaho  - 

MINIMA  Notman 

Larger  species,  length  over  4.4  mm. -  8 

8.  Aedeagus  with  inner  margin  of  each  paramere  sinuate  but  parameres  not  convergent 

at  tips,  outer  margin  straight  to  tip  (fig.  5);  mesosternal  ridge  lower;  palpi 

yellow;  British  Columbia,  Washington - VINDICATA  Fall 

Aedeagus  with  inner  margin  of  each  paramere  straight,  outer  margin  bent  slightly 
outward  near  tip  so  that  tip  is  slightly  elongate  (fig.  6);  mesosternal  ridge  slightly 

higher;  palpi  brown;  E.  Oregon  (Deming  Cr.) - HATCHI  Miller 


Literature  Cited 


Brown,  W.  J. 

1931.  New  species  of  Coleoptera  II.  Canadian  Ent.  63:115-122. 

Brues,  C.  T. 

1932.  Further  studies  of  the  fauna  of  North  American  hot  springs.  Proc.  Amer¬ 
ican  Acad.  Arts  and  Sci.  67(7) :  186-303. 

Fall,  H.  C. 

1901.  List  of  the  Coleoptera  of  Southern  California,  with  notes  on  habits  and 
distribution  and  descriptions  of  new  species.  Occ.  Papers  California  Acad. 
Sci.  8:1-282. 

1924.  New  species  of  North  American  Hydrobiini.  Jour.  New  York  Ent.  Soc 
32:85-90. 

Horn,  G.  H. 

1873.  Revision  of  the  genera  and  species  of  the  tribe  Hydrobiini.  Proc.  Amer¬ 
ican  Philos.  Soc.  13:118-137. 

1890.  Notes  on  some  Hydrobiini  of  boreal  America.  Trans.  American  Ent  Soc 
17:237-278. 

LeConte,  J.  L. 

1855.  Synopsis  of  the  Hydrophilidae  of  the  United  States.  Proc.  Acad.  Nat.  Sci. 
Philadelphia  7:356-375. 

Leech,  H.  B. 

1948.  Haliplidae,  Dytiscidae,  Gyrinidae,  Hydrophilidae,  Limnebiidae.  Contribu¬ 
tions  toward  a  knowledge  of  the  insect  fauna  of  Lower  California.  No.  11. 
Proc.  California.  Acad.  Sci.  24:375-483. 

1950.  New  species  and  subspecies  of  Nearctic  water  beetles  (Coleoptera:  Dy¬ 
tiscidae  and  Hydrophilidae).  Wassman  Coll.  7(6)  :243-256. 


78 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


Leech,  H.  B.  and  H.  P.  Chandler 

1956.  Aquatic  Coleoptera  in  Usinger  (Ed.),  Aquatic  Insects  of  California  with 
Keys  to  North  American  Genera  and  California  Species.  Berkeley  and 
Los  Angeles,  U.  of  California  Press. 

Malkin,  B. 

1958.  On  some  water  beetles  from  Oregon  hot  springs.  Coleop.  Bull.  12:34. 
Walker,  F. 

1866.  Descriptions  of  Coleoptera  in  Lord,  The  Naturalist  in  Vancouver  Island 
and  British  Columbia,  Vol.  2.  London,  Richard  Bentley. 

Winters,  F.  C. 

1927.  Key  to  the  subtribe  Helocharae  Orchym.  (Coleoptera-Hydrophilidae)  of 
Boreal  America.  Pan-Pacific  Ent.  4:19-29. 


NOTICE 


Methods  of  citing  authors’  names  in  species  synonymies  and  in  text  have  been 
quite  variable.  The  International  Code  of  Zoological  Nomenclature,  1961,  provides 
us  with  a  rule  for  such  citations.  The  Bulletin  will  adhere  to  that  rule.  Article 
51(b) (i)  says,  “The  name  of  a  subsequent  user  of  a  scientific  name,  if  cited,  is  to 
be  separated  from  it  in  some  distinctive  manner,  other  than  by  a  comma.  Example. — 
Reference  to  Cancer  pagurus  Linnaeus  as  used  by  Latreille  may  be  cited  as  Cancer 
pagurus  Linnaeus  sensu  Latreille,  [or]  Cancer  pagurus:  Latreille,  or  in  some  other 
distinctive  manner,  but  not  as  Cancer  pagurus  Latreille,  nor  as  Cancer  pagurus, 
Latreille.”  Bulletin  authors,  please  take  note. 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


79 


A  NEW  SPECIES  OF  AGABUS  FROM  THE  DEATH  VALLEY 
REGION  OF  CALIFORNIA  (COLEOPTERA:  DYTISCIDAE) 

By  Hugh  B.  Leech1 


Agabus  rump  pi  Leech,  NEW  SPECIES 


A  species  resembling  large,  dark  examples  of  A.  lutosus  LeConte,  but 
more  elongate.  Males  can  be  traced  to  couplet  21  in  Fall’s  key  (1922), 
where  they  will  not  lit  either  choice  since  the  protarsus  is  broad,  but  the 
anterior  claw  is  not  dentate  in  the  sense  of  A.  lutosus.  Females  trace  to 
couplet  13,  where  there  is  a  multiple  choice  based  on  male  tarsal  characters. 


„  ™L?TYPE;-Male,  from  “2.7  mi.  E.  of  Death  Valley  Junction  (Inyo  co.), 
Calif.,  el.  -200  ,  V-18-1958.  c-3110.  Collection  of  N.  L.  Rumpp.”  In  the  California 
Academy  of  Sciences,  Entomology. 


Length  8.6  mm.,  width  4.6  mm.  Form  elongate  oval,  elytra  widest  at  middle  of 
length.  Head  piceous,  clypeus  yellowish-brown,  labrum  rufescent  as  are  two  occipital 
S?i°fS’  °ne  on.eac^  ,si^e  median  line.  Pronotum  piceous,  narrowly  rufescent  along 
•  u  L°Ur  mar£ms,  with  overall  faint  aeneous  luster  as  on  head.  Elytra  brown,  yellow- 
lsh-brown  laterally  and  apically  (the  elytra  of  the  holotype  are  discolored  in  part, 
perhaps  because  of  an  injury  during  the  pupal  stage;  the  right  elytron  has  a  large 
lnegiuar  yellowish  area  from  the  middle  at  base  to  the  suture  discally,  while  the 
left  has  two  small  elongate  yellowish  marks).  Undersurface  piceous;  antennae,  palpi, 
tarsi  and  tibiae  pale  yellowish-brown,  outer  segments  of  palpi  and  femora  posteriorly 
rufopiceous,  epipleura  brown  medially,  pale  along  each  side;  abdominal  sternites  pale 
to  dark  rufopiceous.  Note:  the  holotype  is  slightly  teneral. 


Head  with  meshes  of  surface  reticulation  small,  of  irregular  sizes  and  shapes,  most 
with  one  or  more  minute  punctures.  Pronotum  with  reticulation  as  on  head  but  more 
lightly  impressed,  meshes  at  sides  smaller;  lateral  marginal  bead  narrow  (about  as 
wide  as  base  of  eleventh  antennal  segment),  of  even  width  throughout;  line  of 
coarse  punctures  paralleling  front  margin  continuous,  punctures  largest  and  most  ir¬ 
regularly  spaced  near  middle;  basal  line  of  punctures  interrupted,  no  punctures 
discally  in  front  of  scutellum.  Elytra  with  a  sutural,  a  discal  and  three  lateral  lines 
of  coarse  punctures;  surface  sculpture  consisting  of  lightly  impressed  tiny,  nearly 
round  meshes,  which  become  uneven  in  sizes  and  shapes  discally;  many  have  each  a 
small  central  puncture.  Protarsi  broad  (fig.  2);  anterior  claw  with  small  blunt  tooth 
at  base  (fig.  3),  widest  just  before  middle,  curving  to  a  fine  point  apically;  posterior 
claw  regularly  narrowing  to  apex,  only  three-quarters  as  long  as  anterior  claw 
Mesotarsi  two-thirds  as  broadly  dilated  as  anterior  tarsi,  fifth  segment  very  long 
(fig.  1  ).  First  three  segments  of  pro-  and  mesotarsi  with  hairs  (except  marginal  ones) 
dilated  apically  into  rather  large  rounded  palettes,  as  in  A.  lutosus  and  A.  griseipennis 
LeConte;  fourth  segment  of  mesotarsi  with  pad  of  short  stiff  setae  only.  Hind  tibiae 
without  row  of  punctures  along  inner  margin.  Prosternal  process  narrow,  as  wide 
as  a  mesotrochanter,  finely  margined  almost  to  the  acuminate  apex,  arcuately  convex 
in  cross  section.  Least  distance  between  middle  coxae  and  metacoxal  plates  less  than 
half  length  of  latter,  measured  along  same  line.  Aedeagus  of  genitalia  bifid  apically 
in  lateral  view,  parameres  densely  hairy  on  inner  side  (figs.  4,  6). 


ALLOTYPE,  female,  same  data  as  for  holotype,  but  with  Mr.  Rumpp’s  collecting 
number  c-3110  a.  In  the  California  Academy  of  Sciences,  Entomology. 

Length  7.9  mm.,  width  4.7  mm.  Head  and  pronotum  colored  as  in  holotype- 
elytra  brown,  yellowish-white  at  sides  in  anterior  half,  yellowish-brown  across  base’ 
Undersurface  colored  as  in  holotype  but  paler  (probably  because  the  specimen  is 
more  teneral),  femora  not  tinged  with  rufopiceous.  Elytra  with  reticulation  coarse 


Associate  Curator  of  Insects,  California  Academy  of  Sciences,  San  Francisco. 


80 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


and  deep,  the  meshes  strongly  longitudinal  baso-medially,  more  nearly  rounded  in 
apical  half  and  laterally,  much  more  lightly  impressed  apically  and  in  apical  half 
near  lateral  margin. 

PARATYPES,  1  male,  2  females  with  same  data  as  holotype  except  as  follows: 
male,  collection  no.  c-3110  b,  females  c-3110  d,  c-3110  e.  All  in  the  California 
Academy  of  Sciences,  except  for  one  female  deposited  in  the  U.  S.  National  Museum, 
Washington,  D.  C. 

Additional  specimen.  1  female,  same  data  as  types,  number  c-3110  c. 

Variation.  There  is  some  variation  in  coloration,  especially  of  the  ventral  surface, 
because  all  five  specimens  in  the  type  series  are  teneral,  the  holotype  the  least  so. 
The  allotype  is  the  only  female  to  show  a  well  defined  pale  area  across  the  elytral 
bases.  The  non-paratypic  female  is  fully  matured  and  colored.  It  has  the  hind 
margins  of  the  femora  tinged  with  piceous  as  in  the  type,  but  the  elytra  are  pale 
reddish-brown,  palest  laterally;  it  is  also  larger  and  proportionately  narrower  than 
the  other  specimens,  i.e.  length  9.4  mm.,  width  4.9  mm. 

Discussion.  In  all  characters  other  than  size,  and  the  protarsal  claws  of 
the  male,  A.  rumppi  is  most  similar  to  A.  lutosus  and  A.  griseipennis ;  all 
three  have  the  aedeagus  of  the  male  bifid  apically  in  profile.  Judging  by 
the  non-paratypic  female,  color  will  not  distinguish  it  from  LeConte’s 
species,  and  it  is  probable  that  a  larger  series  would  show  small  examples 
of  a  size  comparable  with  large  A.  lutosus.  Since  all  but  the  above  female 
were  teneral  when  taken  in  May,  the  latter  may  be  an  overwintered 
specimen. 

In  my  key  to  the  California  species  of  Agabus  (in  Leech  and  Chandler, 
1956)  both  sexes  of  A.  rumppi  will  trace  to  couplet  17;  the  front  tarsi  of 
the  male  are  very  broadly  dilated,  as  in  A.  lutosus  and  A.  griseipennis,  but 
the  anterior  (inner)  tarsal  claw  is  not  toothed  medially  or  apically.  In 
Fall’s  key  (1922)  the  male  will  trace  either  to  couplet  21  or  to  couplet  29, 
depending  on  one’s  interpretation  of  couplet  20,  where  the  choice  is 
“Meshes  of  elytral  reticulation  more  or  less  irregular  and  unequal,  at  least 
baso-medially  ...  21”  as  against  “Meshes  of  elytral  reticulation  very 
minute,  more  rounded,  and  everywhere  nearly  equal  .  .  .  29.”  As  a  matter 
of  fact  this  is  not  an  easy  choice.  As  I  have  stated  earlier,  in  the  male  of 
A.  griseipennis  the  meshes  are  usually  small,  rounded  and  equal  through¬ 
out,  or  of  slightly  irregular  and  uneven  shapes  near  the  suture  at  the  bases 
of  the  elytra.  In  the  male  of  A.  lutosus  lutosus  “.  .  .  the  meshes  are  small, 
and  either  rounded  and  nearly  equal  except  basally  near  the  suture,  or  of 
unequal  shapes  and  sizes  almost  throughout  (type),  or  intermediate  be¬ 
tween  these  conditions.  In  a  series  of  over  300  males  .  .  .  about  seventy- 
five  per  cent  have  the  meshes  equal.  .  .  .”  (Leech,  1942,  p.  132.)  Yet  Fall 
ran  both  species  to  couplet  21.  If  A.  rumppi  is  taken  to  21  it  agrees  with 
the  first  choice  in  its  very  widely  dilated  front  tarsi  with  the  basal  segment 
scarcely  as  wide  as  the  second,  but  differs  in  that  the  anterior  claw  is  not 
toothed  except  minutely  at  the  base  (fig.  3  ).  The  female  cannot  be  traced 
beyond  the  second  half  of  couplet  13  of  Fall’s  key,  since  the  next  choices 
are  based  on  male  tarsal  characters. 

In  the  male  of  A.  rumppi  the  anterior  protarsal  claw  is  a  little  longer 
than  the  fifth  protarsal  segment,  simple,  with  a  tiny  tooth-like  protuberance 
at  the  extreme  base  (fig.  3).  In  A.  lutosus  and  A.  griseipennis  it  is  only 
three-fifths  as  long  as  the  fifth  protarsal  segment,  has  a  rather  similar  basal 


81 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Figures  1-6.  Structures  of  the  male  of  Agabus  rumppi,  new  species.  1 — Profile  of 
mesotarsus,  extent  of  hairy  pads  and  setae  shown  by  dotted  lines.  2 — Dorsal  view  of 
left  anterior  tarsus.  3 — Claws  of  right  anterior  tarsus,  outer  view,  with  anterior  claw 
below.  4— Aedeagus  in  profile.  5— Apical  third  of  the  aedeagus,  view  of  the  dorsal 
side,  i.e.,  the  convex,  top  part  of  Figure  4.  6— Outer  side  of  left  paramere 


82 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


protuberance,  but  is  strongly  toothed  at  the  mid-point  or  beyond  (Leech, 
1942,  PI.  X,  Figs.  11,  12;  Leech  and  Chandler,  1956,  Fig.  13:17  d  and  e). 

A.  rumppi  shows  an  interesting  chaetotaxy  of  the  fourth  mesotarsal 
segment  in  the  male.  From  a  longitudinally  differentiated  area  on  the 
bottom  of  the  fourth  segment  there  are  several  rows  of  short,  stiff,  thick 
setae  arising  from  the  inner  (posterior)  side,  and  a  single  row  along 
the  outer  side.  The  setae  of  the  inner  rows  are  slanted  across  the  segment, 
and  to  a  lesser  degree  toward  the  apex,  so  that  their  tips,  if  extended  a 
little,  would  touch  those  of  the  nearly  vertical  single  row  on  the  outer  side. 

An  exactly  comparable  structure  is  found  in  males  of  A.  lutosus,  A. 
griseipennis,  A.  erythropterus  (Say)  and  A.  ajax  Fall,  species  which, 
except  for  the  first  two,  are  not  closely  associated  on  the  basis  of  other 
characters.  A  chaetotaxy  of  a  similar  but  less  developed  type  (a  single 
row  of  setae  on  each  side)  occurs  in  the  males  of  A.  arcticus  (Paykull), 
A.  anthracinus  Mannerheim,  A.  browni  Leech  and  A.  austini  Sharp;  in  a 
rudimentary  form  it  may  be  seen  in  A.  strigulosus  LeConte,  A.  ambiguus 
(Say)  and  A.  audeni  Wallis. 

Mr.  Rumpp  has  given  to  me  the  following  information  about  the  type 
locality,  from  his  field  notes.  “The  beetles  were  gotten  from  a  small  stream, 
either  at  the  edge  of  it  or  well  into  it.  This  stream  is  a  continuation  of 
Carson  Slough  which  goes  south  through,  and  drains,  Ash  Meadows.  The 
actual  location  was  inside  California,  but  the  source  of  the  slough  is  a 
number  of  springs  further  north  in  the  Nevada  region  of  Ash  Meadows. 
The  elevation  at  this  spot  is  only  a  few  feet  above  22002  This  stream  is 
intermittent,  by  this  time  of  the  year  it  is  usually  dry.  ...  On  this  basis  it 
may  be  assumed  that  the  Agabus  is  native  of  the  stream  in  Ash  Meadows, 
and  its  distribution  therefore  may  include  a  portion  of  Nye  Co.,  Nevada 
as  well  as  Inyo  Co.,  California.” 


Literature  Cited 


Fall,  H.  C. 

1922.  A  revision  of  the  North  American  species  of  Agabus  together  with  a 
description  of  a  new  genus  and  species  of  the  tribe  Agabini.  John  D. 
Sherman,  Jr.,  Mount  Vernon,  N.  Y.  36  pp. 

Leech,  H.  B. 

1942.  New  or  insufficiently  known  Nearctic  species  and  subspecies  of  Agabus 
(Coleoptera,  Dytiscidae).  Canadian  Ent.  74(7) :  125-136,  inch  pi.  X. 

Leech,  H.  B.,  and  H.  P.  Chandler 

1956.  Aquatic  Coleoptera.  Chapter  13  in  R.  L.  Usinger,  ed.,  Aquatic  Insects 
of  California  with  keys  to  North  American  genera  and  California  species. 
University  of  California  Press,  Berkeley.  (Chapter  13,  pp.  293-371,  text 
figs.  13:  1-13:61.) 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


83 


A  NEW  KEY  TO  THE  SUBFAMILIES  OF  THE  NEARCTIC 
STAPHYLINIDAE  AND  NOTES  ON  THEIR 

CLASSIFICATION 

By  Ian  Moore1 

American  coleopterists  often  express  the  view  that  the  Staphylinidae  is 
a  difficult  family  to  study.  Although  the  average  small  size  and  the  numerous 
species  contribute  to  the  problems  of  identification,  a  more  formidable  ob¬ 
stacle  is  the  present  state  of  the  classification. 

The  family  has  been  divided  into  a  number  of  subfamilies  which  are 
intended  to  reflect  the  phylogenetic  relationships  of  their  members.  Some 
of  these  subfamilies  cannot  be  defined  on  the  basis  of  one  or  several  distinc¬ 
tive  characters.  This  has  resulted  in  keys  to  the  subfamilies  which  are  un¬ 
usable.  However,  some  of  the  subfamilies  have  been  divided  into  tribes 
which  are  easy  to  define. 

At  the  present  stage  of  the  knowledge  of  the  family,  the  most  pressing 
problem  is  that  of  identification.  With  this  fact  in  mind,  with  a  view 
toward  simplification,  I  have  treated  some  of  the  groups  usually  considered 
tribes  as  subfamilies.  Having  done  this,  I  have  found  it  possible  to  con¬ 
struct  what  I  consider  to  be  a  usable  key  to  the  subfamilies  of  the  Nearctic 
Staphylinidae  based  on  characters  which  are  generally  visible  in  ordinary 
museum  specimens. 

Some  of  the  characters  in  the  new  key  have  not  been  previously  em¬ 
ployed.  The  most  important  of  these  is  that  given  in  couplet  eighteen, 
which  separates  the  subfamilies  near  Staphilininae  from  those  near  Tachy- 
porinae  by  the  presence  or  absence  of  a  distinct  neck.  The  only  case  where 
application  of  this  character  might  be  considered  doubtful  is  in  Platypro- 
sopinae.  Although  in  members  of  that  subfamily  the  head  is  only  slightly 
narrowed  behind  the  eyes,  there  usually  is  a  distinct  nuchal  constriction 
across  the  dorsal  surface  with  the  sides  of  the  head  continuing  behind  the 
constriction,  more  or  less  parallel  to  each  other.  Thus,  a  true  but  broad 
neck  does  occur. 

Key  to  the  Subfamilies  of  the  Nearctic  Staphylinidae 

1.  Antennae  inserted  on  surface  of  head  between  anterior  margins  of  eyes;  last  segment 


of  maxillary  palpus  subulate  (fig.  1) -  2 

Antennae  inserted  at  front  or  side  margins  of  head  (fig.  2) -  3 

Posterior  coxae  small,  separated - STENINAE 

Posterior  coxae  large,  contiguous - ALE0CHAR1NAE 

Antennae  9-segmented;  posterior  coxae  separated - MICROPEPLINAE 

Antennae  10-  or  11-segmented;  posterior  coxae  contiguous -  4 

Last  segment  of  labial  palpus  large,  semilunar  (fig.  3) - 0XYP0RIIMAE 

Last  segment  of  labial  palpus  not  semilunar -  5 


Head  with  a  pair  of  frontal  calluses  ("ocelli")2  between  the  posterior  margins  of 

the  eyes  (fig.  4) - 

Head  without  frontal  calluses - 


1  Associate  in  Entomology,  San  Diego  Natural  History  Museum,  San  Diego, 
California. 


84 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


6. 

7. 


8. 

9. 

10. 


11. 

12. 

13. 


Tarsi  5-segmented  - TVnTnTVDm 

Tarsi  2-  or  3-segmented - LEPTOTYPHLINAE 

Abdomen  with  complete  second  sternite3  (seven  sternites  can  be  counted)  (fig.  5)-- 

_ OXYTELINAE 

Second  abdominal  sternite  absent  or  rudimentary  (six  complete  sternites  can  be 

counted)  - 

Anterior  marqin  of  labrum  with  two  long  processes  which  are  setose  within  (fig.  6) 

_ ! _ MEGALOPSIDIINAE 

Labrum  without  such  processes -  ,  2 

Antennae  10-segmented  - HYPOCYPHTINAE 

Antennae  11-segmented  -  10 

Last  segment  of  maxillary  palpus  longer  than  penultimate,  slightly  arcuate,  with  an 
oblique  elongated,  concave  truncation  of  distinctive  texture  at  apex  (fig.  7) 

_ _ PINOPHILINAE 


Last  segment  of  maxillary  palpus  not  so  formed -  11 

Metasternum  with  expanded  plates  covering  part  of  femora - TRICHOPSENIINAE 

Metasternum  without  such  plates;  femora  exposed - -  12 

Anterior  tarsi  4-segmented  (in  the  Nearctic  species) - EUAESTHETINAE 

Anterior  tarsi  5-segmented -  I2 3 


Abdomen  without  paratergites  (without  double  margin)  (fig.  8) - 

Abdomen  with  paratergites  (with  prominent  double  lateral  margin)  (fig.  10) 


2  Except  Vellica  longipennis  Casey,  which  will  go  to  Pteroniinae  in  this  key. 
Vellica  longipennis,  a  member  of  the  Omaliinae,  can  be  distinguished  from  members 
of  the  Pteroniinae  by  the  presence  of  a  strong  fovea  at  each  side  of  the  pronotum. 

3  In  some  specimens  of  certain  species  of  the  Coprophilini  (particularly  in  Syn- 
tomium  spp .)  the  second  abdominal  sternite  is  rudimentary.  I  have  been  unable  to 
find  a  satisfactory  substitute  for  this  character. 


7 


Figures  1-7.  1 — Falagria  laeviuscula  LeConte,  head,  dorsal  view.  2  Hadrotes 
crassus  LeConte,  head,  dorsal  view.  3 —Oxyporus  vittatus  Gravenhorst,  apex  of 
labial  palpus.  4 — Acidota  subcarinata  Erichson,  head,  dorsal  view.  5  Bledius  jenyesi 
Bernhauer  and  Schubert,  abdomen,  ventral  view.  6 —Megalopinus  sp.,  head,  dorsal 
view.  7 — Pinophilus  testaceus  Erichson,  apex  of  maxillary  palpus. 


85 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


14. 

15. 

16. 

17. 

18. 


Anterior  coxae  small,  globular,  without  a  transverse  or  diagonal  sulcus  on  anterior 

face  - LISPININAE 

Anterior  coxae  large,  elongate,  with  a  transverse  or  diagonal  sulcus  on  anterior 

face - OSORIINAE 

Anterior  coxae  small,  globular - PIESTINAE 

Anterior  coxae  large,  elongate - 

Elytra  long,  completely  covering  first  tergite  (fig.  9) - PTERONIINAE 

Elytra  not  completely  covering  first  tergite -  17 

Each  basal  abdominal  tergite  with  a  diagonal  impressed  line  from  near  the  middle 
front  margin  to  each  apical  angle;  pronotum  and  elytra  costate  (fig.  10) _ 

- pseudopsidiiimae 

Abdomen  without  such  lines -  18 

Head  constricted  behind  eyes  to  form  a  distinct  neck  that  is  clearly  visible  from  above  19 
Sides  of  head  converging  uninterruptedly  to  base,  not  constricted  to  form  a  neck 
that  is  clearly  visible  from  above -  25 


Hgures  8-13.  8 — Eu mal us  nigrellus  (LeConte),  dorsal  view.  9 — Megarthrus  pictus 

Motschoulsky,  dorsal  view.  10 — Pseudopsis  obliterate i  LeConte,  dorsal  view.  11 _ 

Ely  pony  grus  emmesus  (Gravenhorst),  prothorax,  ventral  view,  A.  neck  plate, 
B.  prosternum,  C.  hypomeron,  D.  coxa.  12 — Olist/iaerus  substriatus  Gyllenhal.  half 
or  prothorax,  ventral  view.  13 — Tachinus  fimbriatus  Gravenhorst,  half  of  prothorax 
ventral  view. 


86 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


19. 

20. 

21. 

22. 


23. 

24. 

25. 

26. 

27. 

28. 


Small  sclerite  (neck  plate)  present  at  anterior  margin  of  prosternum  (fig.  11) - 

_ XANTHOLININAE 

20 

Neck  plate  absent  -  " 

Last  segment  of  maxillary  palpus  less  than  one-half  as  long  as  penultimate,  usually 

little  longer  than  width  of  penultimate,  usually  subulate  or  papiliform  21 

Last  segment  of  maxillary  palpus  at  least  one-half  as  long  as  penultimate,  subulate 

only  in  Heterothops - DTm ac 

Antennal  fossae  closer  to  mandibular  fossae  than  to  each  other - PAEDEK1N  AE 

Antennal  fossae  about  as  close  to  each  other  as  to  mandibular  fossae - DIOCHINAE 

Anterior  angles  of  pronotum  produced  anteriorly  beyond  anterior  lateral  angles  of 
prosternum;  margin  of  pronotum  apparently  single,  hypomera  not  or  incompletely 

margined  along  inner  side - QUEDIINAE 

Anterior  angles  of  pronotum  not  so  produced;  margin  of  pronotum  double,  hypomera 

completely  margined  along  inner  side - j-runDvriMAC 

Lateral  marginal  lines  of  pronotum  separate  throughout - XANTHOPYGIINAE 

Lateral  marginal  lines  of  pronotum  united  behind  anterior  angles -  24 

Antennal  fossae  closer  to  eyes  than  to  each  other - STAPHYLININAE 

Antennal  fossae  closer  to  each  other  than  to  eyes - PLATYPROSOPIiMAE 

Antennae  with  third  through  eleventh  segments  filamentous -  26 

Antennae  not  filamentous - ’.777777777™, m  Vr- 

Anterior  tarsi  very  slender - 

Anterior  tarsi  broadly  dilated - TRICHOPHYINAE 

Elytral  epipleura  delimited  by  a  carina -  adtmap 

Elytral  epipleura  not  delimited  by  a  carina - PHLOEOCHARINAE 

Prosternal  epimera  delimited  by  a  distinct  suture  (fig.  12) - OLISTHAERINAE 

Prosternal  epimera  fused  to  hypomera  without  a  suture  (fig.  13) - TACHYPORINAE 


Discussion  of  Subfamilies 

Although  keys  are  very  useful  tools  for  identification,  because  of  their 
structure  they  cannot  always  indicate  that  certain  characters  are  unique 
within  a  group.  For  this  reason  and  because  many  of  the  subfamilies  in 
the  above  key  have  a  status  different  from  recent  usage,  a  short  discussion 
of  each  subfamily  follows. 

Steninae.  Two  genera,  one  very  large,  are  included  in  this  subfamily.  The 
species,  rather  monotonously  similar  in  appearance,  are  easily  recognized 
by  the  large  eyes  and  rough  sculpture. 

Aleocharinae .  This  subfamily  contains  at  least  two-fifths  of  all  the  species 
in  the  family.  This  group,  much  in  need  of  study,  is  very  difficult.  There 
are  a  large  number  of  poorly  defined  genera,  some  of  which  contain 
hundreds  of  described  species.  The  character  of  placement  of  the  antennal 
fossae,  as  stated  in  couplet  one,  used  to  separate  this  subfamily  and  Steninae 
from  the  other  staphylinids,  is  not  entirely  satisfactory.  In  many  forms  the 
fossae  are  situated  fairly  near  the  front  margin,  but  are  usually  removed 
by  at  least  the  diameter  of  the  fossae.  The  subulate  fourth  segment  of  the 
maxillary  palpi,  although  not  unique  in  the  family,  will  aid  in  recognition  of 
members  of  this  group. 

Micropeplinae.  Members  of  the  Micropeplinae  can  be  distinguished  from 
all  other  staphylinids  by  their  nine-segmented  antennae  and  by  the  fact  that 
the  undersurface  of  the  head  and  pronotum  is  grooved  for  the  reception  of 
these  organs.  The  posterior  coxae  are  well  separated,  a  character  shared 
only  with  the  Steninae.  There  are  two  genera  with  few  species. 

This  group  has  at  various  times  been  ranked  as  a  separate  family.  Its 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


87 


members,  however,  appear  to  be  more  closely  allied  to  the  Staphylinidae 
than  to  any  other  family.  This  is  particularly  evident  in  their  strongly 
chitinized  abdominal  tergites.  Unless  it  can  be  demonstrated  that  their 
nearest  relatives  are  other  than  the  staphylinids,  it  seems  better  to  retain 
them  as  a  subfamily  than  to  create  a  separate  family  merely  because  of 
their  somewhat  aberrant  nature. 

Oxyporinae.  The  large,  semilunar  segment  of  the  labial  palpi  is  unique 
in  the  family.  The  few  species  of  the  single  Nearctic  genus  are  found  on 
fungus. 

Omaliinae.  Members  of  the  Omaliinae  and  those  of  the  Leptotyphlinae 
are  the  only  staphylinids  with  a  pair  of  pale  mounds  on  the  surface  of  the 
head.  These  mounds  have  generally  been  called  ocelli.  Coiffait,  1959, 
demonstrated  that  these  structures  are  not  true  ocelli  and  proposed  the 
name  frontal  calluses  for  them.  The  subfamily  is  large,  with  many  genera 
requiring  close  observation  for  their  identification. 

Leptotyphlinae.  These  minute,  slender,  pale  insects  are  found  in  the  soil. 
Many  species  are  known  from  Europe,  but  it  was  not  until  1959  that 
Coiffait  described  Neoleptotyphlus  californicus  from  the  redwood  forest  of 
the  California  coast.  Several  other  species  are  now  being  studied  by  him. 

Oxytelinae.  This,  one  of  the  larger  subfamilies,  is  unique  in  the  presence 
of  a  complete  second  sternite.  In  a  few  species  this  stemite  is  sometimes 
rudimentary. 

M  ega  l  op  si  diinae.  This  is  a  small  subfamily  whose  members  can  easily  be 
recognized  by  their  enormous  eyes  and  shining  integuments.  The  processes 
of  the  labrum  readily  separate  them  from  other  staphylinids. 

Hypocyphtinae.  There  are  only  two  genera  with  a  total  of  five  known 
species  in  North  America.  These  were  formerly  placed  with  the  Tachy- 
porinae  because  of  their  fusiform  bodies,  but  have  been  removed  on  account 
of  their  ten-segmented  antennae,  a  character  found  elsewhere  in  this  family 
only  in  a  few  of  the  aleocharinds. 

Pinophilinae.  This  group  has  usually  been  treated  as  a  tribe  of  the 
Paederinae,  which  subfamily,  as  so  constituted,  was  impossible  to  define. 
The  Pinophilinae  is  a  fairly  large,  homogeneous  group.  The  character  used 
in  the  key  concerning  the  shape  of  the  last  segment  of  the  maxillary  palpi, 
although  consistent,  is  not  always  pronounced.  Only  a  few  species  of  this 
predominantly  tropical  group  enter  the  Nearctic  region. 

Lispininae.  Because  of  their  small  anterior  coxae  and  often  depressed 
form,  members  of  this  subfamily  have  usually  been  associated  with  the 
Piestinae.  Blackwelder,  1942,  treated  them  as  a  tribe  of  the  Osoriinae  be¬ 
cause  of  their  unmargined  abdomens.  The  above  characters  are  partly 
adaptive  and  seem  in  this  case  to  be  adaptations  to  a  subcortical  habitat. 
The  unmargined  abdomen  has  evolved  in  varying  degrees  in  many  staphy¬ 
linids  as  a  modification  useful  in  a  number  of  different  environments.  Be¬ 
cause  the  Lispininae  and  Osoriinae  seem  not  to  be  closely  allied,  I  have 
treated  each  as  a  separate  subfamily.  Members  of  the  Lispininae  are  easily 
known  by  the  combination  of  their  small  anterior  coxae  and  unmargined 


88 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


abdomens.  There  are  only  six  known  Nearctic  genera,  with  relatively  few 
species  included  in  each. 

Osoriinae.  Members  of  this  subfamily  are  easily  recognized  by  their 
large,  exserted  anterior  coxae  and  unmargined  abdomens.  They  are  usually 
cylindrical  in  form.  Only  a  few  Nearctic  species  are  known  from  the  three 
genera  represented  in  this  region. 

Piestinae.  Most  students  have  included  in  this  group  all  staphylinids  with 
small  anterior  coxae.  Blackwelder,  1942,  reduced  the  size  of  the  subfamily 
by  removing  those  species  in  which  the  abdomen  lacks  paratergites.  Moore, 
1963,  added  Zalobius  and  Asemobius,  and  presented  a  new  key  to  the 
Nearctic  genera.  Like  the  Lispininae  and  Osoriinae,  this  is  largely  a 
tropical  group  with  few  Nearctic  species. 

Trichopseniinae.  The  large  plate  which  covers  part  of  the  femur  is  unique 
in  this  subfamily.  The  two  Nearctic  genera  have  only  seven  species  as¬ 
signed  to  them. 

Pteroniinae,  NEW  NAME.  This  is  the  subfamily  previously  called 
Proteininae.  Blackwelder,  1952,  stated  that  “the  removal  of  the  name 
Proteinus  to  the  Nitidulidae  because  of  hitherto  unrecognized  type  fixation 
leaves  the  genus  formerly  known  as  Proteinus  without  a  name.”  He  gave 
it  the  name  Pteronius.  If  this  name  is  to  be  accepted,  the  subfamily  name 
must  be  Pteroniinae.  Blackwelder’s  usage  has  not  been  followed  by  all 
subsequent  students,  some  of  whom  continue  to  use  Proteininae.  As  I  am 
unable  to  find  any  statement  of  the  reasons  for  rejecting  the  name  Pteronius, 

I  am  retaining  it. 

The  few  species  of  the  two  genera  included  in  this  subfamily  resemble 
some  of  the  Omaliinae,  but  can  be  distinguished  by  the  lack  of  frontal 
calluses  and  by  their  very  transverse  anterior  coxae. 

Euaesthetinae.  As  in  the  preceding  subfamily,  these  small  insects  possess 
no  single  character  for  their  easy  recognition.  The  tarsi  are  four-segmented 
in  the  few  Nearctic  species,  and  the  eyes  are  at  the  base  of  the  head. 

Pseudopsinae.  This  subfamily  contains  the  single  genus  Pseudopsis.  The 
four  Nearctic  species  are  very  generalized  in  form,  having  few  morph¬ 
ological  characters  to  distinguish  them.  However,  the  combination  of  the 
strong  diagonal  impressions  of  the  tergites  and  the  longitudinally  carinate 
pronotum  and  elytra  will  readily  separate  them  from  other  Nearctic  staphy¬ 
linids. 

Xantholininae.  This  group  has  usually  been  treated  as  a  tribe  of  the 
Staphylininae,  adding  greatly  to  the  heterogeneity  of  that  subfamily.  As 
constituted  here,  it  contains  only  those  species  with  the  distinctive  neck 
plates  anterior  to  the  prosternum.  No  other  staphylinid  has  this  sclerite.  In 
members  of  this  group,  the  antennae  are  always  inserted  close  together  at 
the  front  margin  of  the  head.  The  body  is  long,  slender,  loosely  articulated, 
and  the  elytra  usually  overlapping  at  the  suture.  From  this  group,  I  have 
removed  Diochus  and  Ophioomma  to  the  new  subfamily  Diochinae  and 
Platyprosopus  to  the  new  subfamily  Platyprosopinae. 

Pciederinae.  This  is  one  of  the  larger  subfamilies,  with  numerous  well- 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


89 


characterized  genera  All  the  species  have  the  terminal  segment  of  the 
maxillary  palpi  less  than  one-half  as  long  as  the  penultimate  segment  and 
usually  either  subulate  or  papillose. 


Diochinae  Moore,  NEW  SUBFAMILY.  This  subfamily  is  based  on  the 
genus  Diochus.  It  has  usually  been  placed  in  the  Xanthtolininae  because  of 
the  rather  approximate  antennae  and  because  the  area  ahead  of  the  pro¬ 
sternum  shows  some  chitinization.  However,  the  chitinization  of  the  neck 
region  in  no  way  resembles  the  sclerite  called  the  neck  plate,  which  is  so 
characteristic  of  the  Xantholininae.  Some  authors  have  placed  this  genus  in 
the  Staphyhninae,  where  it  seems  to  be  equally  out  of  place.  It  destroys  the 
homogeneity  of  either  of  these  groups.  The  terminal  segment  of  the  maxil¬ 
lary  palpi  is  subulate.  The  single  Nearctic  species  is  small  and  slender 
resembling  certain  species  of  Philonthus  in  facies. 

Judging  from  the  rather  inadequate  description  of  Ophioomma  it  be¬ 
longs  here. 


Quediinae.  This  is  a  large  group  which  has  usually  been  considered  a 
tribe  of  the  Staphyhninae.  The  pronotal  disc  is  usually  impunctate,  except 
or  a  group  of  three  punctures  arranged  in  a  small  triangle  on  each  side 
of  the  center  line  in  front. 


X an thopyginae .  Usually  considered  a  tribe  of  the  Staphyhninae,  this 
group  can  easily  be  recognized  by  the  character  given  in  the  key  There  are 
six  Nearctic  genera,  each  with  a  single  species. 

Staphylininae .  This  is  the  group  which  has  usually  been  treated  as  the 
tribe  Staphylinini.  There  are  few  Nearctic  genera  but  many  species.  The 
group  is  relatively  well  known. 

Platyprosopinae  Moore,  NEW  SUBFAMILY.  Several  authors,  comment¬ 
ing  on  the  genus  Platysprosopus,  have  mentioned  that  it  seemed  out  of 
place  in  the  Xantholinini.  The  only  important  character  which  members 
of  this  genus  have  in  common  with  those  of  the  Xantholininae  is  the  ap- 
!  proximate  antennal  fossae.  A  single  species  is  known  from  Texas  in  this 
tropical  genus,  the  only  genus  in  the  subfamily. 

Habi  ocerinae.  Members  of  the  single  genus  Habrocerus  resemble  tachy- 
porinids  in  lacies,  but  differ  as  indicated  in  the  key.  There  are  few  known 
species. 


Trichophyinae.  The  few  species  are  similar  to  Habrocerus  in  facies. 

Phloeocharinae .  The  only  known  Nearctic  representative  of  this  sub¬ 
family  is  a  single  species  of  Ecbletus  which  has  been  found  in  California 
(in  press).  Olisthaerus  has  sometimes  been  included  here,  but  in  no  way 
resembles  members  of  this  subfamily  except  that  the  species  are  equally 
generalized  in  structure. 

Olisthaerinae.  Two  circumpolar  species  of  Olisthaerus  constitute  this 
subfamily. 

Tachyporinae.  This  is  one  of  the  larger  subfamilies.  The  species  are 
usually  fusiform  in  shape,  compact  in  build  and  are  without  a  neck,  the 
small  head  being  often  only  partly  visible  from  above. 


90 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


Notes  of  Phylogeny 


The  above  key  is  meant  to  be  strictly  an  aid  to  identification.  Some  of 
its  primary  subdivisions  appear  to  have  little  relation  to  phylogeny.  Knowl¬ 
edge  of  the  family  has  not  yet  reached  a  point  where  definite  conclusions 
regarding  phylogeny  can  be  stated.  However,  some  speculation  is  not  out 
of  place  at  present. 

Renaud  Paulian,  1941,  suggested  a  major  change  in  the  classification  of 
the  Staphilinoidea,  the  result  of  a  detailed  study  of  the  larvae  of  a  large 
number  of  species.  His  suggestions  have  not  been  followed  by  subsequent 
students.  Paulian  split  the  group  into  two  major  subdivisions  which  he 
called  the  Staphylinomorphs  and  the  Aleocharinomorphs.  He  called  atten¬ 
tion  to  the  primitive  nature  of  the  Staphylinomorphs.  Paulian  presented 
the  following  key  to  the  larvae  of  the  two  groups. 


Galea  of  the  maxilla  present,  movable,  with  the  aspect  of  a  segment;  lacina  reduced 
at  the  maximum  to  some  localized  bristles  in  the  apical  region  of  the  stipes; 
cephalization  accentuated,  neck  present,  epicranial  suture  extremely  long;  chitini- 
zation  of  the  prosternum  well  developed;  gular  sutures  very  long;  ocelli  assembled 
in  a  group  at  the  base  of  the  antennae;  nasale  present.  Anal  vesicles  provided  with 

numerous  small  terminal  curved  spines;  maxillary  palpi  of  four  S gT^p H Y L IN 0 MORPHS 

Galea  of  maxilla  absent  or  represented  by  a  simple  lobe  bearing  a  fringe,  single  or 
double  or  triple,  located  in  the  apical  region  of  the  lacina  which  is  always  well 
developed;  cephalization  generally  very  feeble,  neck  absent,  epicranial  suture 
variably  long;  prosternal  chitinization  usually  reduced;  gular  sutures  almost  always 
absent;  ocelli  of  variable  distribution.  Anal  vesicles  generally  without  small 
curved  spines,  sometimes  with  four  large  curved  spines.  Maxillary  palpi  variable, 
of  three  or  four  segments.  Labrum  present  or  united  to  epicranium  in  a  nasale-- 

.I _ _ _ ALEOCHARINOMORPHS 


I  believe  that,  as  applied  to  the  Staphylinidae,  this  is  a  very  important 
division  and  have  so  arranged  the  subfamilies.  As  the  Staphylinomorphs 
are  considered  more  primitive,  they  are  placed  first.  Although  this  distinc¬ 
tion  appears  to  indicate  very  satisfactorily  the  relation  of  the  Staphy¬ 
linomorphs  to  other  members  of  the  family,  it  leaves  in  the  Aleocharino- 
morphs  a  group  of  subfamilies  which  is  diverse,  the  relationships  between 
them  not  being  expressed.  Much  more  information  is  needed  before  these 
can  be  adequately  grouped. 


Suggested  arrangement  of  the  subfamilies 


Staphylinomorphs 

1.  Staphylininae 

2.  Xanthopyginae 

3.  Quediinae 

4.  Diochinae 

5.  Platyprosopinae 

6.  Xantholininae 

7.  Paederinae 

8.  Pinophilinae 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


91 


Aleocharinomorphs 

9.  Micropeplinae 

10.  Pseudopsinae 

11.  Piestinae 

12.  Lispininae 

13.  Osoriinae 

14.  Pteroniinae 

15.  Omaliinae 

16.  Oxytelinae 

17.  Oxyporinae 

18.  Megalopsidiinae 

19.  Euaesthetinae 

20.  Leptotyphlinae 

21.  Phloeocharinae 

22.  Olisthaerinae 

23.  Tachyporinae 

24.  Habrocerinae 

25.  Trichophyinae 

26.  Trichopseniinae 

27.  Hypocyphtinae 

28.  Steninae 

29.  Aleocharinae 


Literature  Cited 


Blackwelder,  Richard  E. 

194_.  Notes  on  the  classification  of  the  staphylinid  beetles  of  the  groups  Lispini 
and  Osorinae.  Proc.  United  States  Nat.  Mus.  92:75-90. 

195-.  The  generic  names  of  the  beetle  family  Staphylinidae  with  an  essay  on 
genotypy.  Bull.  United  States  Nat.  Mus.  200:i-iv,  1-483. 

Coiffait,  Henri 

1959.  Monographic  de  Leptotyphlites  (Col.  Staphylinidae).  Rev.  Fran  Ent 
26:237-437,  808  figs. 


Moore,  Ian 

1963.  Removal  of  Zalobius  and  Asemobius  to  the  Piestinae  (Coleoptera- 
Staphylinidae).  Coleopt.  Bull.  17:47-48. 

Paulian,  Renaud 

1941.  Les  premier  etats  des  Staphylinoidea.  Etude  de  morphologie  comparee 
Mem.  Mus.  Nat.  Hist.  (Paris),  n.s.  15:1-361,  1365  figs.,  3  pis. 


92 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


SOME  LEAF-MINING  CHRY SOMELIDS 
OF  LANTANA  (COLEOPTERA) 

By  N.  L.  H.  Krauss1 

The  following  observations  were  made  on  several  species  of  the  genera 
Octotoma  and  Uroplata  (Uroplatini)  mining  leaves  of  Lantana  species  of 
the  c  a  mar  a  type  during  the  past  several  years.  The  attractive  West  Indian 
shrub  Lantana  camara  var.  aculeata  (L.)  Moldenke  is  an  important  pest  of 
ranch  lands  in  Hawaii  and  other  tropical  countries.  Several  species  of  the 
miners  were  sent  to  Hawaii  for  release,  and  two  of  these,  Octotoma 
scabripennis  Guerin  and  Uroplcita  girardi  Pic,  are  now  established. 

It  seems  likely  that  other  species  of  Uroplatini  will  be  found  on  Lantana 
spp.  in  tropical  America. 

Determinations  of  the  insects  discussed  were  made  by  specialists  of  the 
Entomology  Research  Division,  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture.  Propa¬ 
gation,  testing  and  release  in  Hawaii  were  carried  on  by  Q.  C.  Chock,  C.  J. 
Davis  and  other  members  of  the  staff  of  the  Entomology  Branch,  State 
Department  of  Agriculture  (formerly  Board  of  Agriculture  and  Forestry). 


Octotoma  gundlachi  Sufifrian 

A  few  adults  were  seen  on  Lantana  leaves  at  the  Bosque  de  Habana, 
Havana,  Cuba,  in  April  and  May  1952,  and  larvae  were  observed  mining 
the  leaves  in  May.  The  adults  feed  on  the  leaves.  The  chalcid  Spilochalcis 
odontotae  Howard  was  reared  from  pupae  (Krauss,  1953).  In  April  1953, 
87  of  the  adult  beetles  were  sent  to  Honolulu.  In  June  1956  several  adults 
found  on  Lantana  leaves  at  San  Vicente,  Vinales  Valley,  Cuba,  were  col¬ 
lected  and  forwarded  to  Honolulu.  None  of  these  were  released.  Patricia 
Vaurie  (Vaurie,  1956)  has  published  observations  made  in  Cuba  on  this 

insect. 


Octotoma  sp.  probably  plicatula  (Fabricius) 

Adults  of  this  species  were  seen  on  Lantana  at  Zamorano,  Honduras, 
altitude  about  2,400  ft.,  in  September  1953.  Fifty-seven  were  sent  to 
Honolulu  and  three  were  released  at  Hookena,  island  of  Hawaii,  on  May 
10,  1954.  It  is  not  known  to  be  established.  Adults  were  seen  on  Lantana 
at  Turrialba,  Costa  Rica,  in  September  1953,  at  Cartago,  Costa  Rica,  in 
November  1953,  at  Veracruz,  Mexico,  in  June  1955,  and  at  Cordoba, 
Veracruz,  Mexico,  in  September  1955.  Larvae  were  observed  in  mines  in 
Lantana  leaves  at  Guatemala  City,  Guatemala,  in  August  1953  and  at 
Chilpancingo,  Guerrero,  Mexico,  in  August  1955. 


1  Entomological  Branch,  State  Department  of  Agriculture,  Honolulu,  Hawaii. 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


93 


Octotoma  scabripennis  Guerin 

Most  of  my  observations  on  this  species  were  made  at  Cuernavaca 
Morelos,  Mexico,  elevation  5,000  ft.  The  adults  were  numerous  on  Pan- 
tana  glandulosi ssi ma  Hayek  leaves  from  June  to  September,  larvae  from 
July  to  August,  and  pupae  in  August  and  September.  The  flattened  adults 
are  about  7  mm.  long,  rugose  and  black  in  color,  with  a  brownish  tinge  to 
the  upper  surface  of  the  thorax.  Larvae  are  flattened  and  whitish  or  yellow¬ 
ish  in  color,  and  the  pLipae  in  the  mines  are  yellowish.  There  are  sometimes 
t\vo  or  three  mines  in  a  single  leaf.  The  adults  feed  on  the  upper  surfaces 
oi  the  leaves,  leaving  characteristic  scars.  This  insect  was  also  found  on 
Lantana  at  Veracruz  and  Cordoba  in  the  State  of  Veracruz,  at  Revolcadero 
in  Guerrero,  and  at  Oaxaca  and  Mitla  in  Oaxaca.  Octotoma  sp.,  probably 
scabripennis,  was  observed  at  San  Salvador,  Santa  Tecla,  and  Santa  Ana, 
El  Salvador  on  the  same  plant.  In  August  1955  l  found  larvae,  pupae  and 
adults  on  Lippia  umbellata  Cav.  ( Verbenaceae)  at  Cuernavaca,  Mexico. 

I  he  parasites  Spilochalcis  sp.  (Chalcidae)  and  Calliephialtes  sp.  (Ich- 
neumonidae)  were  reared  from  larvae  in  Mexico  in  1955. 

The  first  shipment  of  Octotoma  scabripennis  (adults  and  larvae)  were 
sent  to  Honolulu  from  Cuernavaca,  Mexico,  by  John  Mann,  Entomologist 
ot  the  Queensland,  Australia,  Department  of  Public  Lands,  and  the  writer 
in  July  and  August  1953,  and  Mann  sent  additional  material  in  September. 
The  writer  sent  further  shipments  from  Cordoba,  Mexico,  in  May  and 
June  1955,  and  from  Cuernavaca  in  July  1955,  August  and  September 
1955  (many  larvae,  pupae  and  adults),  June  and  July  1959  (many  adults), 
and  August  1959  (many  larvae,  pupae  and  a  few  adults).  The  first  re¬ 
lease  was  made  at  Kunia,  Oahu,  in  November  1953  and  further  releases 
were  made  on  Oahu,  Hawaii,  Kauai,  and  Molokai  later.  The  insect  was 
not  found  established  until  August  1963,  when  it  was  observed  at  White 
Sands,  Kona,  island  of  Hawaii.  It  has  not  yet  been  found  on  the  other 
islands. 


Uroplata  j ulvopustulata  (Baly) 

:  Larvae  in  leaf  mines  on  Lantana  and  adults  on  the  leaves  were  col- 

;  lected  at  Summit,  Panama  Canal  Zone,  in  June  and  July  1953.  The 
braconid  Bracon  sp.  was  reared  from  larvae  in  July.  In  December  1953 
larvae,  pLipae,  and  adults  were  found  at  Gamboa,  Summit,  and  Pedro 
Miguel  in  the  Canal  Zone,  and  at  Nata  and  Pedregal  in  the  Republic  of 
Panama.  Many  were  found  in  a  small  plant  growing  in  partial  shade  at 
Gamboa.  Adults  were  noted  on  plants  at  Summit,  C.Z.,  in  November  1961, 
a  larva  in  a  mine  at  Sa~o  Paulo,  Brazil,  in  March  1954,  and  a  number  of 
adults  on  Lantana  leaves  at  Revolcadero,  Guerrero,  Mexico,  in  July  1959. 

I  Larvae  and  adults  of  Uroplata  sp.,  probably  / ulvopustulata,  were  seen  on 
plants  at  Sao  Paulo,  Brazil  in  April  1961.  Adults,  larvae,  and  pupae  were 
sent  to  Honolulu  from  the  Canal  Zone  and  Panama  in  December  1953- 
adults  from  Revolcadero,  Mexico,  in  July  1959;  and  larvae,  pupae  and 
adults  (of  U.  sp.  probably  fulvopustulata )  from  Sao  Paulo  in  April  1961; 
but  none  of  these  shipments  was  released.  This  species  is  known  from 
Mexico,  Guatemala,  Costa  Rica,  Panama,  Venezuela,  and  Brazil. 


94 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


Uroplata  girardi  Pic 

This  is  a  species  recorded  from  Brazil,  Paraguay,  and  Argentina.  I 
found  it  at  Vitoria,  Espirito  Santo,  Brazil,  in  July  1961.  Larvae  and  pupae 
in  mines  in  the  leaves  and  adults  on  the  leaves  of  Lantana  were  found 
mostly  on  plants  in  shaded  areas.  The  eulophid  parasite  Dicladocerus  sp. 
was  reared  from  larvae.  One  lot  of  adults  and  immature  stages  of  the 
beetle  was  sent  to  Honolulu.  Releases  were  made  in  Lawai  Valley  and 
Grove  Farm,  Kauai,  beginning  in  December  1961.  The  beetle  is  well 
established  now  in  Lawai  Valley.  A  larva  was  found  in  a  mine  at  Recife, 
Pernambuco,  Brazil,  in  October  1961.  Uroplata  sp.,  probably  girardi,  was 
observed  at  Asuncion,  Paraguay,  in  July  1961 ;  there  were  larvae  and  pupae 
in  mines  and  adults  on  the  leaves. 


Literature  Cited 


Krauss,  Noel  L.  H. 

1953  Notes  on  insects  associated  with  Lantana  in  Cuba.  Proc.  Hawaiian  Ent. 
Soc.  15(1) :  123-125. 

Vaurie,  Patricia 

1956.  Octotoma  gundlachi  mining  Lantana  leaves  in  Cuba.  Coleop.  Bull.  10(5): 
80. 


LITERATURE  NOTICE 

THE  GENUS  BARIS  GERMAR  IN  CALIFORNIA  (COLEOPTERA  CUR- 
CULIONIDAE).  By  Edward  E.  Gilbert.  Univ.  Calif.  Publ.  Ent.  34:1-153,  lllus. 
1964 _ This  treatment  of  the  stem  borers  has  sections  on  morphology,  biology,  dis¬ 

tribution,  and  systematics.  Host  preferences  are  discussed  at  length.  Thirteen  Cal¬ 
ifornia  species  are  described,  illustrated,  and  keyed  in  the  adult,  pupal,  and  larval 
stages  when  available. 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


95 


B-P-HYDROXYPHENYLETHYLAMINE  -  HYDROCHLORIDE 
ON  TROX  SP.  (COLEOPTERA:  SCARABAEIDAE) 

By  Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr.1 

The  enzyme,  Tyrosinase,  has  been  implicated  in  the  darkening  and  hard- 
emng  of  the  insect  cuticle  (Pryor,  1940).  This  enzyme  is  known  to  catalyze 
the  oxidation  of  the  amino-acid  Tyrosine  to  3,  4-dihydroxyphenylalanine. 
Pryor,  Russell,  and  Todd  (1946)  reported  upon  the  occurrence  of  Pro- 
tacatechine  3,  4-diphydroxyphenylacetic  and  3,  4-dihydroxyphenyllactic 
acids  in  insects.  The  substances  are  derivable  from  3,  4-dihydroxyphenyla- 
lanine,  as  is  also  Melanin. 

Another  pathway  of  3,  4-dihydroxyphenylalanine  metabolism  is  cata¬ 
lyzed  by  the  enzyme  3,  4-dihydroxyphenylalanine  decarboxylase,  which  has 
hitherto  been  reported  only  in  animal  tissues  (Holtz  and  Credner,  1952). 
This  leads  to  the  formation  of  3,  4-dihydroxyphenlethylamine  or  Hydroxy- 
tyrosine.  This  latter  reaction  could  conceivably  take  place  in  the  insects,  if 
the  3,  4-dihydroxyphenylalanine  decarboxylase  were  found  to  be  present. 

During  the  course  of  some  studies  on  beetles  associated  with  carrion  it 
was  noted  that  a  number  of  these  beetles  had  small  hexagonal  white  crystals 
firmly  imbedded  in  the  rough  sculpturing  of  the  elytra.  They  were  particular¬ 
ly  noticeable  on  the  elytra  of  several  specimens  of  Trox  sp.  These  beetles 
feed  on  the  dried  skin  of  decayed  animals,  and  because  of  their  habits  they 
are  normally  covered  with  sand,  mud,  and  particles  of  organic  material 
dried  onto  their  bodies.  Upon  washing  in  hot  water,  a  practice  often 
necessary  before  identification,  these  specimens  did  not  lose  the  crystals 
from  their  elytra.  When  examined  more  closely  under  a  binocular  micro¬ 
scope  it  was  observed  that  the  crystals  were  imbedded  in  the  surface  of  the 
elytra.  The  only  explanation  of  their  presence  is  that  they  must  have 
appeared  there  while  the  elytra  were  still  soft. 

Several  other  collections  of  beetles  of  this  genus  were  examined  and 
similar  but  fewer  crystals  were  observed  on  their  elytra.  Of  the  20  specimens 

collected,  14  had  crystals  imbedded  in  their  elytra,  from  10  to  20  crystals 
per  beetle. 

A  few  simple  biochemical  tests  were  performed,  using  a  hot  stage  micro¬ 
scope,  and  the  crystals  were  identified  as  B-p-hydroxyphenylethylamine- 
hydrochloride.  The  difficulty  of  working  with  such  a  small  quantity  and  the 
lack  of  any  of  this  substance  in  pure  form  to  try  a  mixed  melting  point  test 
introduces  several  possibilities  of  error.  However,  considering  the  tests  run 
and  the  physical  properties  of  the  crystals,  and  also  the  fact  that  this  sub¬ 
stance  is  known  to  be  an  animal  product  (generally  associated  with  decay, 

however),  it  seems  reasonable  to  conclude  that  these  crystals  were  cor¬ 
rectly  identified. 


1  Department  of  Biology,  The  Catholic  University  of  America,  Washington,  D.  C. 


96 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


Literature  Cited 

Holtz,  P.,  and  K.  Credner 

1952.  Arch  Expl.  Path.  Pharmakol  199:  145. 

Pryor,  M.  G.  M. 

1940.  Proc.  Roy.  Soc.,  London,  ser.  B  128:  378. 

Pryor,  M.  G.  M.,  P.  B.  Russell,  and  A.  R.  Todd 
1946.  Biochem.  Journ.  40:  627. 


UNUSUAL  HOST  RECORDS  FOR  GYMNAETRON  PASCUORUM, 
HEXARTHRUM  ULKEI,  CHALCODERMUS  AENEUS,  AND  HY¬ 
PER  A  NIGRIROSTRIS  (COLEOPTERA:  CURCULIONIDAE) . 

Adults  of  Gymnaetron  pascuorum  (Gyllenhal)  were  found  on  the  bark  of  Picea 
pungens,  at  Portland,  Oregon,  in  1960,  by  R.  Witt,  and  adults  were  reared  from  the 
spikes  of  Plantago  lanceolcita,  at  3  miles  east  of  Aumsville,  Oregon,  in  1963,  by  E.  A. 
Dickason.  G.  pascuorum  is  a  European  species  introduced  into  the  United  Mates 
and  is  most  commonly  found  in  the  eastern  states  breeding  in  Plantago  lanceolata. 
I  have  also  identified  this  weevil  from  tunnels  of  the  “dogwood  borer,  Thamno- 
sphecia  scitula  (Harris)  (Lepidoptera:  Aegeriidae),  from  McMinn  Co.,  Tennessee,  in 
1962.  G.  pascuorum  was  previously  reported  as  being  associated  with  Tenodera sp. 
eggs  (Orthoptera:  Mantidae)  by  Gurney  (1959,  Proc.  Ent.  Soc.  Washington  61.24). 

Many  larvae  of  Chalcodermus  aeneus  Boheman  were  found  feeding  in  carrot 
tubers,  and  adults  were  found  in  a  field  adjacent  to  a  field  of  carrots  m  Weslaco, 
Texas,  in  March  1961.  C.  aeneus,  known  as  the  ‘cowpea  curcuho/  breeds  in  the  pods 
of  cowpeas  and  related  legumes.  The  specimens  were  received  from  the  Campbell 
Soup  Research  Farm,  Riverton,  New  Jersey. 

Hypera  nigrirostris  (F.),  commonly  known  as  the  Messer  clover  leaf  weevil,’  was 
collected  in  Addison  Co.,  Vermont,  on  birds-foot  trefoil.  Birds-foot  trefoil,  a  legume 
belonging  to  the  genus  Lotus,  is  being  grown  in  the  New  England  states  as  a  forage 
crop.  The  beetles  were  sent  by  the  University  of  Vermont,  and  the  accompanying 
letter  stated  that  a  25-acre  field  was  destroyed. 

Hexarthrum  ulkei  Horn  was  found  feeding  in  laminated  shelves  in  a  shoe  store 
in  Ahoskie,  North  Carolina,  on  Sept.  4,  1959.  H.  ulkei  is  usually  found  in  old 
dry  flooring,  timbers,  and  beams.  The  specimens  were  received  from  D.  L.  Wray, 
Raleigh,  North  Carolina.— Rose  Ella  Warner,  Ent.  Res.  Div.,  A.R.S.,  U.  S.  De¬ 
partment  of  Agriculture,  Washington,  D.  C. 


-BACK  ISSUES 

The  Coleopterists'  Bulletin 


Per 

Single 

Volume 

Issue 

Vol. 

3, 

1949,  6  issues 

(Nos.  1  &  2  o.p.)  $5.00 

$1.00 

Vol. 

4, 

1950,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol. 

s, 

1951,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol. 

6, 

1952,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol. 

7, 

1953,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol. 

8, 

1954,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol. 

9, 

1955,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol. 

10, 

1956,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol. 

11, 

1957,  2  issues 

5.00 

3.00 

Vol. 

12, 

1958,  1  issue 

5.00 

5.00 

Vol. 

13, 

1959,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol. 

14, 

1960,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol. 

is, 

1961,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol. 

16, 

1962,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol. 

17, 

1963,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

(above  prices  Postpaid) 


. ATTENTION  READERS! . 

From  time  to  time  we  receive  requests  from  our  subscribers  who 
wish  to  complete  their  holdings  of  the  Bulletin.  We  would  appre¬ 
ciate  it  if  any  readers  possessing  copies  of  Vol.  3,  No.  1,  with  which 
they  are  willing  to  part,  would  inform  the  Bulletin. 


★ 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 

620  Michigan  Avenue/  N.E. 
Washington  17,  D.  C. 


Send  today  for  your  copy  of— 

"PYGMIES  AND  PYGMOIDS: 

TWIDES  OF  TROPICAL  AFRICA” 

BY 

Martin  Gusinde,  S.V.D. 

JANUARY  1955  ISSUE  OF 
ANTHROPOLOGICAL  QUARTERLY 

•  This  interesting  and  educational  article  is 
based  on  the  author’s  original  observations, 
and  includes  a  complete  bibliography  on  the 
“PYGMIES.” 

Price:  $1.00  Postpaid 
Anthropological  Quarterly 
620  Michigan  Avenue,  N.E.,  Washington  17,  D.  C. 


Now  in  its  37th  year  — 

Anthropological  Quarterly 

(formerly  Primitive  Man) 

Issued  January,  April,  July  and  October 

<rfo 

Some  Recent  Contents: 

Grasshoppers  as  Food  in  Buhaya . P.  O.  Mors 

A  Pygmy  Group  Newly  Discovered  in  New  Guinea.  Martin  Gusinde 

Eskimo  Reindeer  Herding . Robert  T.  Anderson 

Rock  Paintings  of  South  Africa . Abbe  Henri  Breuil 

The  Assinboin  Horse  Medicine  Cult . John  C.  Ewers 

Treatment  of  Disease  in  the  New  Guinea  Highlands 

Louis  J.  Luzbetak 

( Articles  on  Physical  and  Cultural  Anthropology) 

Subscription  Price  $4.00  a  year  Single  Issues  $1.00 

Anthropological  Quarterly 

620  Michigan  Are.,  N.E.  Washington  17,  D.  C. 


VOLUME  18  DECEMBER  (No.  4)  J  1964 

r  -  ■  ■  /  r  P 

!'■ L  /  id 00 

BRUCHIDAE:  On  Neltumius,  by  Kingsolver .  105 

CURCULIONIDAE:  On  Sphenophorus  cicatristriatus,  by  Warner  111 

HYDROPHILIDAE:  New  Berosus,  by  Wooldridge .  97 

LAMPYRIDAE:  Brachypterous  female  Photinus,  by  Lloyd .  127 

SCARABAEIDAE:  On  Ataenius,  by  Cartwright .  101 

SCARAB AEIDAE:  Range  extensions,  by  Russell .  121 

SCARABAEIDAE:  On  Oxygrylius,  by  Hardy .  122 

STAPHYLINIDAE:  On  Orus,  by  Herman .  112 


J-  fT  T tiv.;, 

I..AK  12  WuS 

\  \PRARY 

THE  CATHOLIC  UNIVERSITY  OF  AMERICA  PRESS 

WASHINGTON  17,  D.  C.  ,  r, 


A  Quarterly  Publication  Devoted 
to  the  Study  of  Beetles 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS*  BULLETIN 

Founded  1947  by  Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr. 

The  Coleopterists’  Bulletin  is  published  by  The  Catholic  University  of  America 
Press,  Washington  17,  D.  C.  and  edited  by  T.  J.  Spilman.  It  is  issued  four  times  a  year 
beginning  with  March.  All  business  matters  should  be  addressed  to  The  Coleopterists 
Bulletin  at  the  Press.  Manuscripts  and  other  editorial  matter  should  be  addressed  to 
the  editor,  U.  S.  National  Museum,  Washington  25,  D.  C. 

Back  volumes:  A  stock  of  back  volumes 
is  maintained  and  may  be  purchased  as 
follows:  3  to  date,  $5.00  ea.;  single 
numbers,  $1.25  each;  all  prices  postpaid. 
Missing  numbers:  Issues  lost  in  the  mail 
will  be  supplied  free  of  charge  if  no¬ 
tified  within  three  months  after  mailing. 


Subscriptions:  The  subscription  price  for 
each  annual  volume  of  four  numbers  is 
$5.00  payable  in  advance.  All  sub¬ 
scriptions  begin  with  the  first  issue  of 
the  year  and  those  subscribing  later  in 
the  year  will  receive  the  back  issues  of 
the  volume. 


EDITORIAL  BOARD 


Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr.,  Ph.D. 

Department  of  Biology 
Catholic  University  of  America 

0.  L.  Cartwright 

U.  S.  National  Museum 
Washington  25,  D.  C. 

Eugene  J.  Gerberg,  Ph.D. 

Insect  Control  and  Research,  Inc. 
Baltimore,  Md. 


James  A.  Magner,  Ph.D.,  S.T.D. 

Business  Manager  of  the  Bulletin 
Catholic  University  of  America 

Theodore  J.  Spilman 

U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture 
Washington  25,  D.  C. 

Eileen  R.  Van  Tassell 

Department  of  Biology 
Catholic  University  of  America 


NOTICE  TO  AUTHORS 


Manuscripts  will  be  considered  ONLY 
FROM  SUBSCRIBERS.  Authors  should 
consult  STYLE  MANUAL  FOR  BIO¬ 
LOGICAL  JOURNALS,  prepared  by  the 
Committee  on  Form  and  Style  of  the  Con¬ 
ference  of  Biological  Editors,  and  pub¬ 
lished  by  the  American  Institute  of  Bio¬ 
logical  Sciences,  2000  P  Street,  N.W., 
Washington  6,  D.  C.  The  Bulletin  requires 
that  all  manuscripts  be  prepared  according 
to  instructions  in  the  Style  Manual.  Illus¬ 
trations  should  be  sent  mounted,  and 
numbered.  The  manuscript  should  be 
marked  to  indicate  the  location  of  text 
figures  or  the  position  of  full  page  plates. 

Manuscripts  will  be  acknowledged  upon 
receipt.  As  soon  as  possible  thereafter 
the  author  will  be  notified  as  to  accept¬ 
ance  after  review  by  the  Editorial  Board. 
If  the  manuscript  is  accepted,  a  tentative 
date  of  publication  will  be  set.  In  general, 


all  papers  will  be  published  in  their  order 
of  receipt,  but  the  editor  reserves  the 
right  to  use  articles  out  of  order  in  the 
interest  of  a  balanced  magazine. 

The  editor  will  make  no  text  changes 
without  advanced  notice  to  the  author. 
Galley  proof  will  be  sent  for  correction. 
These  galleys  are  sent  out  well  in  advance 
and  do  NOT  indicate  the  date  or  order 
of  publication. 

Twenty-five  tear  sheets  of  one  page 
notes  will  be  supplied  free  to  the  author  if 
requested  when  returning  galley  proofs. 
Reprints  of  articles  printed  free  of  extrane¬ 
ous  matter  will  be  supplied  with  or  with¬ 
out  covers  at  cost.  Reprints  MUST  be 
ordered  on  the  form  provided  when  re¬ 
turning  galley  proofs.  The  approximate 
cost  of  reprints  will  be  supplied  with  this 
form. 


EDITORIAL  POLICY 


Any  article,  note,  or  news  items  likely 
to  be  of  interest  to  readers  of  the  Bulletin 
will  be  considered.  Articles  with  illustra¬ 
tions  are  particularly  desired,  and  in  all 


cases ,  descriptions  of  new  species  must  be 
illustrated.  Descriptions  of  new  species  or 
genera  MUST  contain  keys  or  be  cor¬ 
related  with  existing  keys. 


A  QUARTERLY  PUBLICATION  DEVOTED  TO  THE  STUDY  OF  BEETLES 

The  Coleopterists’  Bulletin 


Volume  18  December  (No.  4)  1964 


TWO  NEW  SPECIES  OF  BEROSUS 
FROM  THE  SOUTHEASTERN  UNITED  STATES 
(COLEOPTERA:  HYDROPHILIDAE) 

By  David  P.  Wooldridge1 

The  two  species  of  Berosus  described  in  this  paper  are  from  the  collec¬ 
tion  of  Dr.  Frank  N.  Young  of  the  Indiana  University  Department  of 
Zoology.  The  specimens  had  been  in  his  possession  for  some  time,  and  he 
was  gracious  enough  to  give  me  all  of  his  undetermined  material  when  he 
learned  of  my  interest  in  Berosus.  Therefore,  it  is  with  pleasure  that  I  name 
the  first  species  below  in  his  honor. 

Berosus  youngi  Wooldridge,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  1-3) 

The  presence  of  a  more  or  less  triangular  black  spot  on  each  side  of  the 
pronotum,  about  two-thirds  of  the  distance  from  the  midline  toward  the 
margin,  will  readily  separate  this  species  from  all  other  Berosus  found  in 
the  Eastern  United  States. 

HOLOTYPE:  Florida,  Broward  County,  canal  near  Davie,  Frank  N.  Young 
ix. 9. 1 950.  To  be  deposited  in  the  University  of  Michigan  Museum  of  Zoology. 

Description  of  Holotype— Male.  Length  4.0  mm.;  width  2.1  mm.  Head:  Shiny 
black,  with  a  faint  metallic  blue  luster,  bronzed  slightly  around  the  eyes;  moderately 
closely,  but  evenly,  punctate,  except  much  more  coarsely  so  around  the  eyes.  Labrum 
shiny  black,  except  testaceous  at  the  center  of  the  anterior  margin;  punctation  of 
labrum  very  variable  in  size  and  almost  confluent,  each  puncture  with  a  short  golden 
hair,  the  very  fine  hairs  most  noticeable  along  the  anterior  margin.  Antennae  and 
palpi  yellowish.  Pronotum:  Dark  yellowish-brown  with  black  markings  as  follows- 
An  elongate  longitudinal  vitta  on  each  side  of  the  middle,  leaving  a  narrow  pale 
region  between;  a  triangular  black  spot  2/3  of  the  distance  from  the  midline  toward 
the  margin  on  each  side,  situated  with  the  base  of  the  triangle  parallel  to  the  margin 
and  with  the  apex  pointing  toward  the  disk  (figure  1).  Moderately  coarsely  punctate 
the  punctures  not  particularly  close;  less  coarsely  punctate  than  the  head  except  for 
several  series  of  very  coarse  punctures.  The  disk  faintly  alutaceous,  more  so  toward 
the  side  margins.  Scutellum:  Black,  shining;  middle  closely,  coarsely  punctate  with 
margins  alutaceous.  Elytra:  Dark  yellowish-brown  with  striae  and  punctures  piceous- 
stnal  punctures  close  and  deep  on  the  disk,  separated  by  about  the  diameter  of  a 
puncture,  striae  slightly  impressed  between  punctures  on  the  disk,  becoming  more 
deeply  impressed  on  the  declivity;  lateral  striae  becoming  less  impressed  Intervals 


1  Department  of  Zoology,  Southern  Illinois  University,  Alton,  Illinois. 


ISSUED  FEB  5-65 


98 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


coarsely  punctate,  punctures  arranged  more  or  less  in  rows,  but  somewhat  irregular. 
Elytral  maculations  piceous,  located  as  follows.  Three  in  a  diagonal  series  from  the 
humerus  to  just  before  the  middle:  one  on  the  humerus,  one  on  the  5th  interval,  and 
a  somewhat  geminate  spot  on  the  2nd  and  3rd  interval  with  the  spot  on  the  2nd 
being  very  weak.  A  transverse  series  of  faint  spots  just  behind  the  middle:  one  at 
the  margin,  one  on  the  4th  and  5th  interval  with  a  faint  streak  on  the  6th,  and  one 
on  the  2nd  interval,  the  last  being  a  little  farther  back  than  the  other  two.  A 
geminate  spot  about  half-way  between  these  three  and  the  apex,  followed  by  another 
spot  just  before  the  apex,  these  last  two  spots  on  the  4th  and  5th  intervals.  Each 
elytron  is  also  piceous  at  the  apex.  Ventral  surface:  Piceous.  Legs  yellowish;  basal 
half  of  profemora  granular  on  both  sides,  granulation  extending  about  2/3  of  the 
way  from  base  to  apex;  meso-  and  metafemora  with  granulation  somewhat  more 
extended  ventrally,  but  dorsally  mostly  smooth  except  for  narrow  bands  crossing 
each  diagonally.  Basal  segments  of  protarsi  only  moderately  dilated,  the  first  with  a 
dense  brush  of  hairs  on  the  distal  2/3,  2nd  and  3rd  segments  each  with  a  few  hairs. 
First  abdominal  sternite  with  a  median  carina  extending  1/3  to  1/2  way  across  its 
width.  Emargination  of  the  5th  abdominal  sternite  with  two  small,  fine,  close  teeth 
which  are  somewhat  concealed  by  a  low  crest  projecting  under  them.  Aedeagus: 
Seen  dorsally,  the  parameres  are  individually  rather  pointed,  but  together,  the  points 
come  together  to  form  a  somewhat  rounded  tip.  The  sides  of  the  parameres  are 
sinuate  and  slightly  flared  before  the  extremity;  the  penis  is  rather  broad  and  abrupt¬ 
ly  pointed  (figure  2).  In  side  view,  the  parameres  slope  smoothly  and  gently  to  the 
tips  (figure  3). 


Figures  1-3,  Berosus  youngi,  new  species.  1 — pronotum.  2 — aedeagus,  lateral  view. 
3 — aedeagus,  dorsal  view. 

Figures  4-5,  Berosus  corrini,  new  species.  4-aedeagus,  lateral  view.  5  aedeagus, 
dorsal  view. 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


99 


ALLOTYPE:  Same  locality  data  as  holotype.  Female.  Length  3.9  mm.;  width 
2.1  mm.  .Similar  to  male  except  as  follows.  Head,  pronotum  and  scutellum  more 
strongly  alutaceous.  Protarsi  simple;  granulation  on  legs  more  nearly  reaching  apex 
of  femora  than  on  male,  at  least  on  the  ventral  surface.  Teeth  in  the  emargination 
of  the  5th  sternite  more  widely  separated  and  more  distinct;  no  crest  below  them. 

PARATYPES:  4  $  ,  9  9  ,  same  data  as  holotype  and  allotype.  Additional  para- 
types  are  designated  as  follows.  FLORIDA.  33,89,  Alachua  Co.,  Lake  Lochloosa 
(pond),  n.3.1937,  F.  N.  Young;  1  9  ,  Alachua  Co.,  flatwoods  near  Lake  Lochloosa, 
n.3.1937,  C.  J.  Goin  and  F.  N.  Young;  1  3  ,  Franklin  Co.,  roadside  ditch  near  St. 
Teresa,  vi.5.1938,  F.  N.  Young;  I3,  Glades  Co.,  roadside  ditch  near  Palmdale, 
v. 25. 1946,  F.  N.  Young;  1  3  ,  Levy  Co.,  cypress  pond  near  Lennon,  iv.9.1937,  F.  N. 
Young;  GEORGIA.  13,19,  Clinch  Co.,  ditch  2  mi.  W.  of  Homerville,  x.28.1938 
F.  N.  Young  and  H.  H.  Hobbs. 

VARIATION:  Length  3.6-4. 1  mm.  The  degree  of  metallic  lustre  on  the  head 
varies  greatly  from  one  specimen  to  another.  The  maculations  of  the  elytra  and 
pronotum  vary  in  darkness  and  extent.  The  pronotal  maculations,  particularly  the 
lateral  ones,  are  occasionally  piceous  rather  than  black.  All  punctation  is  exceeding 
variable  in  coarseness,  as  is  the  degree  and  extent  of  the  alutaceous  sculpture  in 
both  sexes. 

LARVA:  Unknown. 

DISTRIBUTION:  Known  only  from  Florida  and  Southern  Georgia. 


Berosus  corrini  Wooldridge,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  4-5) 

The  highly  polished  male  pronotum,  the  polished  elytra  of  both  sexes, 
the  barely  impressed  discal  striae,  and  the  light  general  punctation  will 
usually  separate  this  species  from  closely  related  forms.  The  shape  of  the 
male  genitalia  is  also  distinctive. 

HOLOTYPE.  GEORGIA,  Clinch  County,  near  Homersville,  H.  H.  Hobbs  and 
F.  N.  Young,  x.28.1938.  To  be  deposited  in  the  University  of  Michigan  Museum  of 
Zoology. 

Description  of  Holotype.  Male.  Length  5.0  mm.,  width  2.4  mm.  Head:  Shiny 
black,  very  faintly  bronzed.  Moderately  coarsely  punctate,  punctures  distinct,  except 
around  eyes  much  more  coarse  and  nearly  confluent.  Labrum  shiny  black  with  slight 
bronzing,  covered  with  a  vestiture  of  readily  visible  but  very  fine  hairs.  Antennae 
and  palpi  yellowish,  last  segment  of  palpi  darker  at  tip.  Pronotum:  Testaceous,  except 
for  a  narrow  longitudinal  black  vitta  on  each  side  of  the  middle,  the  two  vittae 
separated  by  a  nearly  impunctate  region.  The  remainder  of  the  pronotum  punctate, 
the  punctures  shallow  and  well  separated  on  the  disk,  becoming  deeper  and  closer 
toward  the  lateral  edges;  nearly  confluent  at  margins.  Scutellum:  Shiny  black; 
closely,  coarsely  punctate  in  middle  with  fairly  wide,  impunctate  margins.  Elytra: 
Dark  testaceous  with  striae  and  punctures  faintly  piceous  to  undifferentiated  in 
color.  Discal  striae,  especially  the  incomplete  2nd  stria,  composed  of  a  series  of 
well  separated  but  slightly  elongate  punctures;  punctures  becoming  closer  on  declivity. 
Striae  impressed  laterally  and  past  declivity,  but  barely  or  not  at  all  on  the  disk. 
Most  lateral  punctures  not  elongate;  well  separated,  frequently  by  more  than  the 
diameter  of  a  puncture.  Interstrial  punctures  less  deeply  impressed  and  more  widely 
separated.  Elytral  maculations  piceous  but  very  faint,  consisting  of  obscure  streaks 
of  indefinite  size;  only  the  humeral  spot,  the  marginal  spot  just  past  the  middle,  and 
the  spot  on  intervals  4  and  5  at  the  level  of  the  marginal  spot  are  distinct.  Ventral 
surface:  Piceous.  Legs  yellowish;  femora  granular  ventrally  as  follows:  Profemora, 
from  basal  1/5  of  front  margin  to  middle  of  hind  margin;  mesofemora,  entire  basal 
half,  metafemora,  basal  5/8.  Dorsal  granulation  of  femora  reduced  to  narrow  trans¬ 
verse  bands  on  meso-  and  metafemora.  Protarsi  with  basal  segments  moderately 
dilated  and  with  a  ventral  pad  of  hairs  on  the  1st  and  2nd  segments;  3rd  segment 
with  only  a  few  hairs.  First  visible  abdominal  sternite  with  a  median  carina  extend¬ 
ing  acioss  half  its  width.  Last  abdominal  sternite  with  a  median  emargination  in  the 


100 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


center  of  which  are  two  small  teeth  which  are  well  separated.  Projecting  below  the 
teeth  is  a  small  low  crest  which  only  partially  conceals  them.  Aedeagus:  Seen 
dorsal  ly,  the  parameres  together  are  evenly  rounded  at  the  apex,  and  more  or  less 
parallel-sides  along  their  entire  length  (figure  4).  In  side  view,  the  apex  of  the 
paramere  barely  projects  beyond  the  tip  (figure  5).  The  penis  is  slender  and  some¬ 
what  sinuate. 

ALLOTYPE:  Same  locality  data  as  holotype.  Female.  Length  5.2  mm.,  width 
2.5  mm.  Similar  to  male,  but  with  the  pronotum  faintly  alutaceous,  especially  at 
sides.  Head  also  alutaceous.  Emargination  of  5th  abdominal  sternite  without  a  pro¬ 
jecting  median  ridge.  Granulation  of  femora  on  all  legs  reaching  farther  distally  than 
in  a  male,  especially  on  the  dorsal  surfaces. 

PARATYPES:  All  collected  by  F.  N.  Young,  except  as  noted.  FLORIDA:  17  $  , 
10  9  ,  Alachua  Co.,  Lake  Lochloosa,  ii.3.1937;  1  $  ,  Alachua  Co.,  west  of  Gaines¬ 
ville,  ii.  14.1949;  2  $  ,  Baker  Co.,  Osceola  Nat.  Forest,  v.12.1937;  1  $  ,  1  9  ,  Broward 
Co.,  canal  near  Davie,  xii.29.1938;  6  $  ,  9  9,  Columbia  Co.,  near  Lulu,  xii. 30.1947; 
2  $  ,  1  9  ,  Dade  Co.,  Miami,  S.  N.  Brown  and  F.  N.  Young;  1  $  ,  Jefferson  Co., 
south  of  Lamont,  iii.18.1939;  1$,  Liberty  Co.,  south  of  Telogia,  v.2.1941;  2$, 
Union  Co.,  near  Dukes,  xii.30.1947.  GEORGIA:  14  $  ,  9  9  ,  same  data  as  holotype; 
12  $  ,  4  9  ,  Clinch  Co.,  near  Dupont,  x.28.1938;  1^,29,  Cook  Co.,  3  miles  north 
of  county  line  on  U.  S.  41,  x.28.1938;  1  $  ,  Lowndes  Co.,  west  of  Naylor,  x.28.1938; 
2  $  ,  Toombs  Co.,  Altomaha  River,  viii.24.1959. 

VARIATION:  Length  4. 4-5. 6  mm.  The  major  variations  are  in  the  elytral  color 
and  maculations.  A  few  specimens  show  a  light  background  with  distinct  maculations, 
while  most  are  dark  with  obscure  markings.  In  a  few  specimens  the  discal  striae  are 
more  definitely  impressed,  but  all  specimens  show  places  where  the  strial  punctures 
are  separated  by  flat  surfaces. 

LARVA:  Unknown. 

DISTRIBUTION:  Known  only  from  Florida  and  Southern  Georgia. 

The  only  readily  available  key  for  the  Berosus  of  the  Southeastern  United 
States  is  that  of  Young  (1954,  pp.  197-198).  The  two  species  described 
here  can  be  included  in  that  key  by  substituting  the  following  for  couplet  6. 

6(5).  Pronotum  with  no  markings  other  than  a  central  dark  spot  or  pair  of  dark  spots--  7 
6.  Pronotum  with  a  triangular  dark  spot  on  each  of  the  central  spot  or  pair  of  spots; 

length  3. 6-4.1  mm. - YOUNGI  Wooldridge 

7(6).  Eytra  and  pronotum  of  female  and  pronotum  of  male  distinctly  microreticulate 
(alutaceous),  not  strongly  shining;  elytral  striae  not  very  deeply  impressed  on  the 


disk;  length  variable,  about  3.7  to  6.0  mm. - INFUSCATUS 

7.  Elytra  and  pronotum  of  male  and  elytra  of  female  without  evident  microreticula¬ 
tion,  appearing  very  smooth  and  shining  between  the  coarser  punctures -  8 


8(7).  Elytral  striae  rather  deeply  impressed,  especially  on  disk;  length  about  4.0  to 

5.5  mm. - STRIATUS  COMPLEX 

8.  Elytral  striae  barely  or  not  at  all  impressed  on  the  disk,  although  strial  punctures 

are  often  strong  but  always  well  separated;  length  4.4  to  5.6  mm.  C0RRINI  Wooldridge 


Literature  Cited 


Young,  F.  N. 

1954.  The  water  beetles  of  Florida.  Univ.  Florida  Stud.,  Biol.  Sci.  Ser.,  vol.  5, 
no.  1,  pp.  i-ix,  1-238,  figs.  1-31. 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


101 


LECTOTYPE  DESIGNATIONS  AND  NEW  SYNONYMY  IN 

THE  GENUS  ATAENIUS 
(COLEOPTERA:  SCARABAEIDAE) 

By  Oscar  L.  Cartwright1-  2 

Recently,  through  the  courtesy  and  cooperation  of  Drs.  E.  B.  Britton 
and  A.  M.  Villiers,  I  had  the  privilege  of  studying  type  series  of  many 
species  of  Ataenius  in  the  British  Museum  (Natural  History),  London, 
England,  and  in  the  Museum  National  d’Histoire  Naturelle  in  Paris,  France! 
In  the  course  of  this  study  l  designated  and  labeled  specimens  of  various 
species  as  lectotypes. 

In  the  British  Museum  the  following  were  chosen  and  labeled  as  lecto¬ 
types,  all  labels  were  printed  except  as  noted;  my  notations  are  given  in 
brackets: 

Ataenius  strigicauda  Bates,  1887:  96.  6  labels:  Type  [orange  circle]/Sp. 
figured/ Cordova/Mexico.  Salle  Coll/Ataenius  strigicauda  [hand 
written]/B.C.A.  Col. 11.(2).  Ataenius  strigicauda,  Bates/. 

Ataenius  jalapensis  Bates,  1887:  100.  5  labels:  Jalapa  Mexico.  Hoege/ 
jalapensis  [hand  writtenj/B.C.A.  Col. II (2).  Ataenius  polyglyptus 
Bates/Type  [red  circle]/Ataenius  abditus  C.L.38  Horn/. 

Ataenius  polyglyptus  Bates,  1887:  99.  4  labels:  Type  [orange  circle]/ 
Duenas,  Guatemala.  C.  Champion/polyglyptus  Bates  [hand  written]/ 
B.C.A.  Coll. II (2).  Ataenius  polyglyptus,  Bates/. 

Ataenius  intermedius  Bates,  1887:  100.  4  labels:  Type  [orange  circle]/ 
V.  de  Chiriqui,  25-4000  ft.  Champion/  polyglyptus  v.  intermedius 
Bates  [hand  written]/B.C.A.,  Coll.II(2).  Ataenius  polyglyptus  Bates/. 
Ataenius  hieronymi  Bates,  1887:  100.  4  labels:  Type  [orange  circle]/ 
S.  Geronimo,  Guatemala.  Champion/  Ataenius  hieronymi  Bates  [hand 
written]/B.A.C.,  Col.II(2).  Ataenius  polyglyptus,  Bates/. 

Ataenius  mariarum  Bates,  1887:  102.  4  labels:  Type  [orange  circle]/  Tres 
Marias  Is.,  W.  Mexico,  Forrer/Ataenius  mariarium  Bates  [hand 
wntten]/B.C.A.,  Col.II(2).  Ataenius  [blank  space],/. 

Ataenius  scalptifrons  Bates,  1887:  100.  6  labels:  Type  [orange  circle]/ 
sp.  figured/Cordova/Mexico.  Salle  Coll. /Ataenius  scalptifrons  Bates 
[hand  written]/B.C.A.  Col.II(2).  Ataenius  [blank  space]/. 

Ataenius  euglyptus  Bates,  1887:  97.  4  labels:  Type  [orange  circle]/Las 
Vigas,  Mexico.  Hoege/Ataenius  euglyptus  Bates  [hand  written]/ 
B.C.A.,  Coll. 11(2).  Ataenius  [blank  space]/. 

Ataenius  limbatus  Bates,  1887:  98.  4  labels:  Type  [orange  circle]/Presidio, 
Mexico,  Forrer. /Ataenius  limbatus  Bates  [hand  writtenj/B.C.A.,  Col! 
11(2).  Ataenius  [blank  space]/. 


1  Smithsonian  Institution,  Washington,  D.  C. 

-  Financial  assistance  was  provided  by  National  Science 
GB-1434. 


Foundation.  Grant  No. 


102 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


Ataenius  cribrithorax  Bates,  1887:  95.  6  labels:  Type  [red  circle]/Cor 
dova/Salle  Coll./Ataenius  cribrithorax  Bates  [hand  written] /Ataenius 
cribrithorax  keys  apond  Salle  [hand  written]/B.C.A.,  Col.II(2). 
Ataenius  cribrithorax  Bates./. 

Ataenius  setiger  Bates,  1887:  98.  4  labels:  Type  [orange  circle]/Chil- 
pancingo,  Guerrero,  Hoege. /Ataenius  setiger  Bates  [hand  written]/ 
B.C.A.,  Col.II(2) .  Ataenius  [blank  space]/. 

Ataenius  liogaster  Bates,  1887:  94.  2  labels:  Paso  Antonio,  400  ft.  Cham- 
pion/B.C.A.,  Col. II (2).  Ataenius  liogaster  Bates/. 

Aphodius  pacificus  Sharp,  1879:  90.  3  labels,  including  data  on  card 
bearing  2  specimens  [left  hand  specimen  chosen  as  the  lectotype]: 
Aphodius  pacificus  Sharp.  Types  D.S.  Honolulu,  Blackburn/Type 
[orange-red  circle]/Sharp  Coll.  1905-313/. 

In  the  Paris  Museum  the  following  were  chosen  and  labeled  as  lecto¬ 
type  s: 

Ataenius  castaniellus  Bates,  1887:  95.  2  labels:  Zapote,  Guatemala,  C. 
Champion/ Ataenius  castaneellus  Bates  [hand  written — the  spelling 
appears  to  be  “ee”  or  “ae,”  no  “i”  with  a  dot]./. 

Oxyomus  striatocrenatus  Fairmaire,  1889:  14.  4  labels:  Museum  Paris, 
Mou-pin,  A.  David  1870/980  [folded  yellow  circle]/  Ataenius  striato- 
crenat  Fairm.  [hand  written]/Oxyomus  striatocrenatus  Frm.  [hand 
written]/. 

A.  Schmidt,  1922:  431,  placed  striatocrenatus  Fairmaire  in  the 
genus  Ataenius;  however,  because  the  mandibles  are  visible  beyond  the 
clypeus,  this  very  large  species  from  the  interior  of  China  should  be 
placed  in  Aegialia  or  a  genus  near  it.  It  is  not  an  Ataenius. 

Psammodius  alleonis  Fairmaire,  1875:  193.  3  labels:  Euria  Alleon  [hand 
written — abbreviated  or  illegible — type  locality  given  in  original  de¬ 
scription  is  “environs  de  Constantinople”]/Museum  Paris,  1906,  Coll. 
Leon  Fairmaire/Psammodius  Alleonis  Fairm.  n.sp.  Ann.  1875  [hand 
written]/. 

I  had  hoped  also  to  designate  lectotypes  for  the  Harold  species  of 
Ataenius  in  the  Paris  Museum  but  found  only  part  of  his  species  and  many 
of  these  were  without  locality  labels.  Apparently  M.  Oberthur  had  broken 
up  the  Harold  collection  and  distributed  the  specimens  in  various  places 
in  his  own  collection.  Those  that  I  found  were  scattered  among  other 
Ataenius  species  in  three  places  in  his  collection:  among  his  own  Aphodii- 
nae,  among  the  Bates  Ataenius  there,  and  a  few  in  a  box  of  Melolonthinae. 
The  other  Harold  specimens  probably  are  elsewhere  in  the  Oberthur  col¬ 
lection  but  I  failed  to  find  them. 

The  specimens  identifiable  as  Harold  specimens  usually  carry  a  small 
line-bordered  printed  label — “Ex  Musaeo  E.  Harold.”  I  consider  those 
specimens  bearing  Harold’s  handwritten  determination  labels  as  true  rep- 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


103 


rcscntatives  of  his  species.  Even  though  some  of  these  have  no  locality 
labels,  I  believe  we  can  do  no  better  than  to  accept  them  with  the  status 
of  lectotypes.  With  a  single  exception,  the  following  Harold  species  of 
Ataenius  were  identified  by  Harold  determination  labels:  simulator, 
capitosus,  opatrinus,  intiger,  opacus,  picinus,  scutellaris ,  laborator,  puncti- 
penis,  arenosus,  crenatus,  attenuator,  complicatus ,  columbicus,  sculptor, 
horni,  sordidus,  and  figurator.  The  last  named  does  not  bear  a  determina¬ 
tion  label  but  it  is  from  Musaeo  E.  Harold  and  is  labeled  “Louisiana,”  the 
type  locality  of  figurator. 


In  my  study  of  types  of  Ataenius  I  found  the  following  interesting 
synonymy  for  two  species  of  unusually  wide  distribution. 

Ataenius  simulator  Harold,  1868:  85. 

Psammodius  schwarzi  Linell,  1896:  721.  (NEW  SYNONYMY.) 

Diagnostic  characters:  very  distinct,  coarse  transverse  granules  covering 
the  clypeus;  a  few  very  coarse  punctures  near  posterior  angle  and  base  of 
pronotum;  middle  and  hind  femora  without  posterior  marginal  lines. 

Ataenius  simulator  Harold  was  described  from  Mendoza,  Argentina,  and 
schwarzi  (Linell)  from  Jacksonville,  Florida.  1  have  seen  North  American 
specimens  from  the  states  of  Virginia,  Tennessee,  North  Carolina,  South 
Carolina,  Georgia,  Florida,  Alabama,  Mississippi,  and  Louisiana.  South 
American  specimens  were  examined  from  Argentina,  Chile,  Uruguay. 
Bolivia,  and  Brazil.  A  small  series  from  Windsor,  New  South  Wales,’ 
Australia  was  seen. 

Ataenius  simulator  Harold  is  rarely  if  ever  a  dung  feeder  and  though 
the  adults  are  exceedingly  common  at  times,  the  larvae  are  rarely  found. 
They  are  sometimes  attracted  to  lights  in  such  numbers  as  to  bring  com¬ 
plaints  and  requests  for  control.  An  irate  citizen  once  sent  me  a  cupful  of 
specimens  taken  in  a  country  church  near  Anderson,  South  Carolina,  with 
the  statement  thtat  they  had  entered  the  church  through  open  windows  and 
simply  rained  down  over  the  congregation.  I  received  a  similar  lot  from 
Goldsboro,  North  Carolina.  At  Blackville,  South  Carolina,  June  4,  1938, 
more  than  275,000  were  collected  in  a  trap  light  during  one  night.  The 
estimate  was  made  by  weighing  the  entire  lot,  then  weighing  and  counting 
a  smaller  part  of  the  catch.  The  species  is  apparently  spreading  westward 
and  northward  from  southeastern  United  States. 

Ataenius  picinus  Harold,  1867:281. 

Ataenius  duplopunctatus  Lea,  1923:6.  (NEW  SYNONYMY) 

Ataenius  salutator  Fall,  1930:99.  (NEW  SYNONYMY) 

Ataenius  queirosii  Paulian,  1934:219.  (NEW  SYNONYMY) 

Ataenius  darlingtoni  Hinton,  1937:179.  (NEW  SYNONYMY) 

Ataenius  boucomontii  Paulian,  1937:41.  (NEW  SYNONYMY) 


104 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


Diagnostic  characters:  crenate  fimbriate  lateral  pronotal  margins;  finely 
densely  punctate  ninth  elytral  intervals;  posterior  tibial  fringe  invariably  a 
group  of  four  fimbriae. 

I  have  examined  holotype  or  cotype  of  all  of  the  synonyms  listed. 
Ataenius  picinus  Harold  was  described  from  Chile,  A.  duplopunctatus  Lea 
from  western  Australia,  A.  salutator  Fall  from  Florida,  A.  queirosii  Paulian 
from  New  Hebrides,  A.  darlingtoni  Hinton  from  Puerto  Rico,  and  A. 
boucomonti  Paulian  from  Australia. 

I  have  seen  specimens  of  picinus  Harold  from  the  United  States  from 
South  Carolina,  Georgia,  Florida,  Alabama,  Mississippi,  Louisiana,  and 
Texas.  It  occurs  in  the  West  Indies,  in  Cuba,  Jamaica,  Hispaniola,  Puerto 
Rico,  Virgin  Islands,  Antigua,  Guadaloupe,  and  Grenada.  South  American 
specimens  from  Brazil,  Bolivia,  Paraguay,  Uruguay,  Argentina,  and  Chile 
have  been  examined.  I  have  seen  it  also  from  Australia,  New  Zealand,  Fiji, 
New  Caledonia,  and  New  Hebrides. 

Ataenius  picinus  Harold  is  a  dung  feeder.  I  have  collected  it  in  large 
numbers  in  suitable  areas  in  fresh  to  day-old  cow  dung. 

Literature  Cited 

Bates,  Henry  Walter 

1887.  In  Biol.  Centr.-Amei .,  Ins.,  Coleop.  2(2):94-102,  illus. 

Fairmaire,  M.  Leon 

1875.  (.  .  .  diagnoses  de  trois  Coleopteres  nouveaux.  .  .  .)  Bull.  Soc.  Ent. 
France  (5)5:CXCIII. 

1889.  Coleopteres  de  l’unterieur  de  la  Chine.  Ann.  Soc.  Ent.  France  9:5-84. 
Fall,  Henry  Clinton 

1930.  On  Ataenius  strigatus  Say  and  allied  species.  Jour.  N.  Y.  Ent.  Soc. 
38:93-108. 

von  Harold,  Edgar 

1867.  Die  chilensischen  Aphodiden.  Berliner  Ent.  Zeit.  11:278-282. 

1868.  Diagnosen  neuer  Coprophagen.  Col.  Hefte  3:80-86. 

Hinton  Howard  E. 

1937.  Descriptions  of  new  American  Ataenius,  with  notes  on  others.  Ann. 
Mag.  Nat.  Hist.  (10)20:177-196. 

Lea,  Arthur  M. 

1923.  On  Australian  Aphodiides.  Proc  Roy.  Soc.  Victoria  3 6 :  ( 1  ) : 2-20. 
Linell,  Martin  L. 

1896.  New  species  of  North  American  Coleoptera  of  the  family  Scarabaeidae. 
Proc.  U.S.  Nat.  Mus.  18(  1096)  :72 1-73  1. 

Paulian,  Renaud 

1934.  Deaux  nouveaux  coprophages  des  Nouvelles-Hebrides.  Rev.  Franc.  Ent. 
1:219-221. 

1977.  Trois  nouveaux  Ataenius  de  la  region  australienne.  Misc.  Ent.  38(5): 
41-43. 

Schmidt,  Adolf 

1922.  Aphodiinae.  Das  Tierreich,  Lief  45:1-164. 

Sharp,  D. 

1879.  On  some  Coleoptera  from  the  Hawaiian  Islands.  Trans.  Ent.  Soc.  London 
1879:77-105. 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


105 


THE  GENUS  NELTUMIUS  (COLEOPTERA:  BRUCHIDAE) 

By  John  M.  Kingsolver1 

The  genus  Neltumius  was  erected  by  Bridwell  in  1946  for  the  species 
Bruchus  arizonensis  Schaeffer.  Bridwell  did  not  present  a  formal  descrip¬ 
tion  of  the  genus  and  it  is  necessary  to  rely  upon  the  characters  used  in 
the  key  to  genera  included  in  the  paper.  Bradley,  also  in  1946,  transferred 
two  more  species,  Bruchus  gibbothorax  Schaeffer  and  Bruchus  texanus 
Schaeffer,  to  Neltumius  and  included  a  short  generic  description.  No  other 
species  are  known  which  can  be  referred  to  this  genus.  None  of  the  in¬ 
cluded  species  have  been  illustrated  heretofore. 


Neltumius  Bridwell 

Neltumius  Bridwell,  1946,  Jour.  Wash.  Acad.  Sci.  36(2)  :54;  Bradley, 
1946,  Psyche  53:35. 


Ground  color  black;  vestiture  of  black,  white,  gray,  and  ochreous  hairlike  scales 
arranged  in  distinctive  patterns.  Head  carinate,  sparsely  covered  with  hairs,  puncta- 
ti°n  fine;  eyes  black  or  brown,  deeply  emarginate;  antennae  serrate,  reaching  base  of 
elytra,  similar  in  the  two  sexes.  Prothorax  strongly  convex,  gibbous;  depressed  ante- 
scutellar  area  marked  with  white;  apex  rounded;  pleura  concave,  without  lateral 
canna  or  margin,  base  markedly  lobed  in  middle  third,  laterad  of  lobe  sinuate; 
posterior  angles  acute.  Elytra  together  slightly  longer  than  wide;  apices  separately 
rounded  with  apical  margin  finely  serrate,  lateral  margins  straight  or  slightly  arcuate; 
striae  well-marked,  deep  strial  punctures  setose,  teeth  absent  at  bases  of  striae; 
humeri  granulate  or  with  fine  transverse  carina.  Front  coxae  nearly  contiguous  at 
apices,  separated  basally  by  narrow  triangular  prosternum;  middle  coxae  separated  by 
rounded  mesosternal  plate,  hind  coxae  nearly  contiguous,  each  hind  coxa  about  114 
times  as  wide  as  hind  femur;  each  hind  femur  with  shallowly  silicate  ventral  margin 
and  with  a  small  single  tooth  on  inner  margin  of  sulcus  at  apical  fourth;  apex  of 
each  hind  tibia  with  5  to  7  short  teeth  surrounding  insertion  of  basitarsus,  basitarsus 
Wi  times  as  long  as  remaining  four  segments;  claws  lobed  at  base.  First  abdominal 
sternite  three  times  as  long  as  second;  second,  third  and  fourth  subequal;  fifth  slightly 
longer  and  shallowly  emarginate  in  male  but  unmodified  in  female.  Pygidium  grayish 
with  vague  or  bold  darker  markings,  nearly  vertical. 

General  discussion:  Neltumius  does  not  seem  to  be  closely  related  to 
any  of  the  other  recognized  species  groupings  in  the  New  World.  A  broad 
study  of  world  genera  of  Bruchidae  may  be  necessary  to  elucidate  the 
relationships  of  this  genus.  The  structure  of  the  hind  femur  indicates 
that  it  might  be  an  offshoot  of  the  Old  World  Bruchidius  complex,  but 
other  characters  need  to  be  confirmed.  Bradley  thought  that  the  species  in 
Neltumius  were  probably  close  relatives  of  Gibbobruchus  mimus  (Say) 
because  of  the  gibbous  prothorax  in  mimus;  but  this  relationship  is  remote 
because  of  the  greatly  swollen  hind  femora  with  several  teeth  and  the 
broad,  flat  body  shape  of  mimus.  Gibbobruchus  Pic  embraces  several 
species  in  the  tropics  and  appears  to  be  a  close  relative  of  Specularius 
Bridwell  and  Caryedes  Hummel. 


1  Entomology  Research  Division.  Agric.  Res.  Serv.,  U.  S.  Department  of  Agricul¬ 
ture,  Washington,  D.  C. 


106 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


The  wing  venation  of  Neltumius  is  of  a  fairly  consistent  type  peculiar 
to  most  Bruchidae  and  does  not  indicate  any  primitive  or  specific  charac¬ 
teristics. 

The  distribution  of  Neltumius  is  apparently  restricted  to  the  Sonoran 
Desert  areas  of  the  United  States  and  probably  includes  parts  of  Mexico 
although  records  are  lacking  from  that  country. 

Host  plant  records  indicate  a  preference  for  species  of  Prosopis,  the 
common  and  the  screwbean  mesquite,  but  further  collections  are  needed. 
Mesquite  is  host  to  several  species  of  Bruchidae.  Neltumius  arizonenis  has 
been  reared  several  times  from  Prosopis  juliflora  and  N.  gibbothorax  from 
P.  odorata  (screwbean)  by  Mr.  C.  D.  Johnson.  Other  records  from  other 
host  plants  may  be  merely  those  of  adult  feeding.  More  care  is  needed 
in  recording  the  true  host  relationships. 

Only  two  host  records  are  known  for  Neltumius  texanus.  If  they  truly 
reflect  the  host  relationships  of  this  species,  they  indicate  a  radical  de¬ 
parture  from  the  habits  of  the  other  two  species  in  the  genus  and  indeed 
from  known  food  habits  of  other  Bruchidae.  I  suspect  that  the  records  for 
texanus  may  reflect  only  accidental  hosts  or  adult  feeding. 

Key  to  the  Species  of  Neltumius 

1  Hind  tibia  uniformly  gray.  Dorsum  of  body  mostly  grayish-white  with  prominent 
patches  of  dark  brown  and  ochreous  setae.  Single  median  gibbosity  near  anterior 
margin  of  prothorax.  Prominent  elongated  white  spot  at  middle  of  the  third  interval 

of  elytra.  Fine  transverse  carina  on  each  humerus - GIBBOTHORAX  (Schaeffer) 

Hind  tibia  with  brown  band  at  middle  of  posterior  margin.  Dorsum  with  strongly 
contrasting  dark  brown  and  grayish  elongated  patches.  Third  interval  with  two  or 
more  elongated  white  patches  separated  by  dark  brown.  Humerus  carinate  or 

granulate  - 7 

2.  Prothorax  with  prominent  paired  gibbosities  separated  by  shallow  median  and  trans¬ 
verse  channels,  posterior  pair  more  prominent  than  anterior  pair.  Humerus  with 

fine  transverse  carina  - ARIZONENSIS  (Schaeffer) 

Prothorax  with  gibbosities  and  channel  only  slightly  indicated.  Humerus  granulate 

_ TEXANUS  (Schaeffer) 


Neltumius  gibbothorax  (Schaeffer) 

(Figs.  1-10) 

Bruchus  gibbothorax  Schaeffer,  1904,  Jour.  N.Y.  Ent.  Soc.  12:230;  Fall, 
1910,  Trans.  Amer.  Ent.  Soc.  36:162. 

Neltumius  gibbothorax:  Bradley,  1946,  Psyche  53:36. 


Color:  Dorsum  clothed  with  brown,  ochreous,  and  gray  hairs  in  distinctive  pattern 
(fig.  1);  sides  and  venter  with  intermixed  gray  and  ochreous  hairs;  legs  evenly  clothed 
with  gray  hairs;  antennae  piceous  with  gray  pubescence.  Head:  Antennae  as  in  fig.  10. 
Fine  black  median  carina  extending  from  interocular  fovea  nearly  to  the  epistomal 
suture;  vertex  finely  punctate;  frons  densely  clothed  with  ochreous  and  gray  hairs, 
labrum  finely  granulate.  Prothorax:  Subconical,  pleura  slightly  concave;  disk  densely 
covered  with  ochreous  and  gray  hairs,  gibbosity  with  vaguely  defined  paired  brown 
blotches;  antescutellar  area  lighter  gray;  base  lobed  at  middle;  apex  rounded.  Elytra: 
Evenly  convex,  slightly  depressed  in  scutellar  region;  humeri  prominent  and  with  a 
fine,  serrate,  transverse  carina  connecting  bases  of  striae  6  and  7;  striae  deep  and 
narrow,  strial  punctures  unisetose.  Scutellum  white.  Length  of  body:  Apex  of  pro¬ 
thorax  to  apex  of  pygidium,  2. 5-4.0  mm. 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


107 


Male:  Pygidium  (fig.  7)  evenly  convex,  uniformly  clothed  with  gray  and  ochreous 
intermixed  hairs,  sometimes  with  indistinct  darker  spot  in  middle;  short  tuft  of  grav 
hans  in  middle  of  first  abdominal  sternite;  posterior  margin  of  last  sternite  deeplv 
and  broadly  emargmate;  genitalia  (figs.  2,  3,  4,  6)  with  ventral  valve  U-shaped 
sepaiated  fioni  apex  of  median  lobe  by  lightly  sclerotized  area;  everted  endophallus 
girdled  by  a  band  of  acicular  spicules;  paired  reniform  sclerites  located  laterally 
neai  base;  paired  terminal  sclerites  as  in  fig.  6;  parameres  deeply  divided,  rounded  at 
apices  (fig.  3).  ’  £U 

Fema/e:  Pygidium  (fig.  8)  somewhat  gibbous  at  apex;  basal  half  colored  as  in  male 
apical  half  with  darker  oblong  spot  divided  by  lighter  median  line;  first  sternite  with¬ 
out  tuft  of  hairs;  last  sternite  not  emarginate. 


Figurls  1-10,  Neltumius  gibbothorax.  1 — Body,  dorsal  view.  2 — Aedeagus,  lateral 
view.  3— Parameres,  dorsal  view.  4 — Aedeagus,  ventral  view.  5 — Prothorax  and  head, 
lateral  view  6— Terminal  sclerite  of  endophallus.  7— Pygidium  of  male.  8— Pygidium 
ot  temale.  9 — Posterior  femur,  inner  aspect.  10 — Antenna. 


108 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


Material  examined:  ARIZONA:  Pinal  Mts.  (Type  locality,  lectotype  9  , 
U.S.N.M.  No.  42286);  Ft.  Yuma,  Jan.  20,  Apr.  12,  Aug.  20,  Hubbard 
&  Schwarz;  Tacna,  May;  Alamo  Crossing,  Bill  Williams  River,  Nov.  21, 
1956,  ex  pods  of  Prosopis  odorata;  Colorado  River  at  Parker,  Aug.  15, 
1963,  C.  A.  Taschi,  at  light;  5  miles  west  of  Laveen,  Nov.  28,  1959,  C.  D. 
Johnson,  on  Prosopis  odorata;  Bullhead  City,  Apr.  2,  1956,  Werner  and 
Butler,  on  alfalfa;  Phoenix,  Feb.  14,  1960,  C.  D.  Johnson,  on  Prosopis 
odorata.  CALIFORNIA:  21  miles  north  of  Blythe,  Dec.  8,  1959,  C.  D. 
Johnson,  ex  seeds  of  Prosopis  odorata;  Blythe,  June  1,  1956,  E.  I.  Smith, 
Prosopis  pubescens  seeds.  NEVADA:  Glendale,  May  12,  1930,  E.  W. 
Davis,  on  Pluchea  sericea.  UTAH:  St.  George,  July,  Wickham.  MEXICO: 
No  specific  locality,  collected  Feb.  1,  1949,  in  Plant  Quarantine  Division, 
U.S.D.A.,  inspection  in  seeds  of  Prosopis  (Strombocarpa)  pubescens. 

Discussion:  This  species  is  closely  related  to  arizonensis ,  from  which 
it  can  easily  be  distinguished  by  the  uniformly  gray  tibiae,  anteriorly  placed 
prothoracic  gibbosity,  predominantly  gray  vestiture,  and  vaguely  marked 
pygidium.  From  texanus,  it  is  distinguished  by  the  carinate  humerus, 
uniformly  gray  tibiae,  distinctive  male  genitalia,  and  other  characters  given 
in  the  key. 

The  male  genitalia  of  gibbothorax  and  arizonensis  are  almost  indis¬ 
tinguishable.  The  only  difference  I  have  detected  so  far  is  in  the  shape 
of  the  terminal  sclerites  (figs.  6  and  15),  but  these  may  prove  to  be  too 
variable  to  be  reliable.  External  characteristics  are  apparently  constant. 

Neltumius  arizonensis  (Schaeffer) 

(Figs.  11-15) 

Bruchus  arizonensis  Schaeffer,  1904,  Jour.  N.Y.  Ent.  Soc.  12:229;  Fall, 
1910,  Trans.  Amer  Ent.  Soc.  36:162. 

Neltumius  arizonensis:  Bridwell,  1946,  Jour.  Wash.  Acad.  Sci  36(2)  :54, 
(generic  description);  Bradley,  1946,  Psyche  53:36. 

Color:  Dorsum  clothed  with  black  and  intermixed  gray  and  ochreous  hairs  in 
contrasting  pattern  (fig.  11);  sides  and  venter  with  gray  and  ochreous  hairs  in 
mottled  patterns;  legs  gray  with  brown  spot  or  band  near  apex  of  each  femur  and 
in  middle  of  lateral  face  of  each  tibia;  antennae  piceous  with  gray  pubescence. 
Head:  Antennae  as  in  fig.  10;  median  carina  glossy,  nearly  covered  by  the  gray 
and  ochreous  hairs  of  frons;  vertex  finely  punctate;  labrum  slightly  sulcate.  Pro¬ 
thorax:  Subconical,  pleura  slightly  concave;  disk  with  a  gray  cruciform  indentation 
separating  four  dark  brown  or  black  gibbosities;  antescutellar  area  whitish-gray. 
Elytra:  Evenly  convex,  slightly  depressed  in  scutellar  region;  humeri  prominent  with 
finely  serrate,  transverse  carina  between  bases  of  striae  6  and  7;  dorsal  pattern 
composed  of  gray,  ochreous,  and  black  hairs;  striae  deep  and  narrow,  strial  punctures 
distinct,  unisetose.  Scutellum  white.  Length  of  body:  Apex  of  pronotum  to  apex  of 
pygidium,  2. 5-4.0  mm. 

Male:  Pygidium  (fig.  13)  evenly  convex,  gray-ochreous  with  short,  transverse, 
dark  bar  in  middle  and  paired  longitudinal  marks  near  margin  of  apex;  short  tuft 
of  gray  hairs  in  middle  of  first  abdominal  sternite;  posterior  margin  of  last  sternite 
deeply  and  broadly  emarginate;  genitalia  discussed  under  gibbothorax. 

Female:  Pygidium  (fig.  14)  somewhat  gibbous  at  apex,  gray-ochreous  with  dark 
T-shaped  mark  in  apical  half  connected  with  vague  spots  near  apex,  narrow  median 
line  gray-ochreous;  first  sternite  without  hair  tuft;  last  sternite  not  emarginate. 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


109 


Figures  11-15,  Neltumius  arizonensis.  11 — Body,  dorsal  view.  12 — Prothorax  and 
head,  lateral  view.  13 — Pygidium  of  male.  14 — Pygidium  of  female.  15 — Terminal 
sclerite  of  endophallus. 


Figures  16-25,  Neltumius  texanus.  16 — FTead  and  prothorax,  lateral  view.  17 _ 

Body,  dorsal  view.  18.  Pygidium  of  male.  19 — Pygidium  of  female.  20 — Aedeagus, 
lateral  view.  21 — Ventral  valve,  caudal  view.  22 — Aedeagus,  ventral  view.  23 — 
Parameres,  caudal  view.  24 — Parameres,  dorsal  view.  25 — Aedeagus,  apex  dorsal 
view. 


no 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


Material  examined:  ARIZONA:  Pinal  Mts.  (Type  locality,  $  holotype, 
U.S.N.M.  No.  42285);  Miami,  1941,  R.  L.  Furniss,  on  Prosopis  chilensis, 
Nov.  22,  1959,  C.  D.  Johnson,  ex  seeds  Prosopis  juliflora;  Yuma  Co.,  no 
date;  Tucson,  May  1,  Hubbard  &  Schwarz,  Sept.  2,  1959,  H.  P.  Koenig, 
Dec.  1953,  G.  D.  Butler,  in  gin  trash,  June  11,  1954,  M.  Cazier,  July  23, 
1938;  Sacaton,  Nov.  1,  1935,  ex  Prosopis  velutina;  Wickenburg,  Dec.  18, 
1959,  C.  D.  Johnson,  ex  seeds  Prosopis  juliflora;  Scottsdale,  Dec.  6,  1959, 
C.  D.  Johnson,  ex  seeds  Prosopis  juliflora ;  20  miles  north  of  Florence, 
Nov.  22,  1959,  C.  D.  Johnson,  ex  seeds  Prosopis  juliflora;  5  miles  west  of 
Laveen,  Nov.  28,  1959,  C.  D.  Johnson,  ex  seeds  Prosopis  juliflora;  Ft. 
McDowell,  Nov.  18,  1959,  C.  D.  Johnson,  ex  seeds  Prosopis  juliflora; 
Globe,  July  4,  D.  K.  Duncan;  Arivaca,  July  26,  1941,  R.  H.  Beamer. 
CALIFORNIA:  El  Centro,  Jan.  15,  1945,  in  mesquite  pods;  Indio,  Sept. 
15,  1929;  Bard,  Oct.,  1920,  ex  seeds  Prosopis  chilensis;  Blythe,  Feb.  20, 
1957,  C.  Tyndall,  Dec.  18,  1959,  C.  D.  Johnson,  ex  seeds  Prosopis  juliflora; 
Calexico,  Jan.  1,  1945,  ex  mesquite  pods,  May  15,  1911.  TEXAS:  El  Paso 
Co.,  May  25,  1961,  on  Chilopsis  linearis;  Presidio,  Apr.  27,  1950,  J.  H. 
Russell,  in  light  trap.  NEVADA:  Overton,  Apr.  15,  1930,  D.  Fox  on 
Covillea  tridentata. 

Discussion:  The  differences  between  arizonensis  and  gibbothorax  are 
discussed  under  the  latter.  From  texanus,  arizonensis  is  distinguished  by  the 
slightly  larger  size,  carinate  humerus,  more  prominent  prothoracic  gib¬ 
bosities,  presence  of  a  hair  tuft  on  the  basal  sternite  in  the  male,  and  the 
distinctive  genitalia. 


Neltumius  texanus  (Schaeffer) 

(Figs.  16-25) 

Bruchus  texanus  Schaeffer,  1904,  Jour.  N.Y.  Ent.  Soc.  12:231;  Fall,  1910, 
Trans.  Amer.  Ent.  Soc.  36:162. 

Neltumius  texanus:  Bradley,  1946,  Psyche  53:36. 

Color:  Dorsum  clothed  with  brown,  gray,  and  ochreous  hairs  in  distinctive  pattern 
(fig.  17);  sides  and  venter  with  intermixed  gray  and  ochreous  hairs;  legs  clothed 
with  gray  and  ochreous  hairs  with  median  brown  band  on  posterolateral  face  of 
each  tibia;  antennae  piceous  with  gray  pubescence.  Head:  Median  carina  glossy  black; 
frons  sparsely  covered  with  gray  and  ochreous  hairs;  head  finely  punctate;  labrum 
bare,  somewhat  sulcate,  yellowish  brown  at  apex.  Prothorax:  Subcorneal,  pleura 
slightly  concave;  disk  convex  with  paired  brown,  obsolete  tuberosities  near  base 
flanking  triangular  white  antescutellar  patch;  vaguely  defined  paired  brown  spots  at 
apex;  base  strongly  lobed  at  middle,  sinuate  laterally,  posterior  corners  acute;  apex 
rounded.  Elytra:  Evenly  convex;  humeri  prominent,  granulate,  lacking  serrate  carina 
of  preceding  two  species;  striae  narrow  and  deep  with  setiferous  punctures  hardly 
discernible;  scutellum  white.  Length  of  body:  Apex  of  pronotum  to  apex  of  pygidium, 
2. 0-2. 5  mm. 

Male:  Pygidium  (fig.  18)  evenly  convex,  whitish-gray  in  basal  third,  mixed  gray 
and  ochreous  with  narrow  median  gray  line  in  apical  third;  posterior  margin  of  last 
abdominal  sternite  slightly  emarginate,  apical  margin  of  eighth  tergite  visible  between 
pygidium  and  last  sternite;  tuft  of  hair  on  first  abdominal  sternite  in  first  two 
species  lacking  in  this  species;  genitalia  with  ventral  valve  deltoid  (fig.  21),  dorsal 
valve  membranous  (fig.  25);  endophallus  armed  with  acicular  spicules  but  without 
terminal  or  reniform  sclerites.  Parameres  (figs.  23  and  24)  deeply  divided,  armed 
at  apices  with  stout  spines. 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


1 1 1 


Female:  Pygidium  (fig.  19)  with  triangular  gray  spot  in  middle  of  base  flanked 
by  ochreous  spots;  faint,  brown,  transverse  median  band  interrupted  by  median  line 

of  gray;  paired  vague  brown  spots  near  apical  margin;  last  abdominal  sternite  not 
emarginate. 

Material  examined:  TEXAS:  Esperanza  Ranch,  Brownsville  May  2 
(Type  locality,  9  holotype,  U.S.N.M.  No.  42287);  Victoria,  Apr.’ 6,  1911, 
J.  D.  Mitchell,  on  Xanthoxylum  clava-herculis;  San  Antonio,  May  10 
1907,  E.  A.  Schwarz;  San  Diego,  May  18  and  31,  Hubbard  &  Schwarz- 
Winter  Haven,  May  26,  1949,  ear  berries  Condalia  obovata;  Brownsville’ 
Apr.  28,  1904,  May  18-22,  1904,  June,  Wickham,  July  2,  1945,  on  cotton,’ 
July  6,  1945,  A.  J.  Chapman.  ARIZONA:  Mesa,  May  13,  1940. 

Disc  ussion.  This  species,  although  obviously  belonging  to  N eltumius , 
is  quite  distinctive  in  several  respects.  The  granulate  humeri,  the  lack  of  a 
tuft  of  hairs  on  the  basal  abdominal  sternite  of  the  male,  and  the  radically 
different  male  genitalia  all  indicate  a  distinctly  separate  line  of  evolution 
within  the  genus.  T exanus  resembles  arizonensis  more  closely  than  it  does 
gibbothorax  in  the  color  pattern  and  in  the  brown-banded  tibiae.  I  was  not 
able  to  successfully  evert  the  endophallus  of  texanus  but  it  apparently  lacks 
the  larger  sclerites  found  in  the  other  two  species. 

Acknowledgments 

M°st  °f  the  records  in  this  paper  were  taken  from  material  deposited  in  the 
U.  S.  National  Museum  Collections.  I  wish  to  thank  Mr.  C.  D.  Johnson  of  the 
University  of  California,  Dr.  George  Byers  of  the  University  of  Kansas,  Dr  Floyd 
Werner  of  the  University  of  Arizona,  and  Mrs.  Patricia  Vaurie  of  the  American 
Museum  of  Natural  History  for  loans  of  additional  specimens. 


SPHENOPHORUS  CICATRISTRIATUS.  DAMAGING  BLUE  GRASS 
LAWNS  IN  WASHINGTON  STATE  (COLEOPTERA:  CURCULION- 
IDAE). 

Specimens  of  Sphenophorus  cicatristriatus  Fahrs.,  damaging  blue  grass  lawns  were 
collected  by  E.  C.  Klosermeyer,  in  Benton  Co.,  Washington,  June  3,  1963.  Larvae 
were  found  feeding  on  the  roots,  and  adults  were  collected  in  association  with  the 
arvae.  Some  lawns  had  several  square  yards  of  grass  killed,  with  as  many  as  six 
larvae  per  square  foot.  This  species  has  a  known  distribution  from  Alberta,  through 
North  Dakota  and  Montana  south  to  Mexico  City,  Vera  Cruz,  and  Yucatan.  Material 
in  the  U.  S.  National  Museum  collection  is  from  the  following  states:  North  Dakota 
Nebraska,  Wyoming,  Colorado,  New  Mexico,  and  now  Washington.  The  North 
Dakota  and  Wyoming  specimens  were  collected  in  short  grass  near  alkali  lakes  and 
at  a  dry  saline  lake.  No  additional  biological  information  is  available. — Rose  Ella 
Warner,  Ent.  Res.  Div.,  A.R.S.,  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture,  Washington,  D.  C. 


112 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


A  REVISION  OF  ORUS  CASEY. 

I.  SUBGENUS  LEUCORUS  CASEY  AND  A  NEW  SUBGENUS 
(COLEOPTERA:  STAPHYLINIDAE) 

By  Lee  H.  Herman,  Jr.1 2 3 4 

Casey  (1905)  differentiated  Leucorus  from  the  closely  related  genera 
Orus  and  Pycnorus  by  an  edentate  or  bidentate  labrum  and  a  body  color 
of  .  .  always  pale  ferrugineus  .  .  (Casey  1905,  p.  192).  Species  of  the 
other  two  genera  were  considered  uniformly  piceous  or  black  with  a 
quadridentate  labrum.  Some  specimens  of  two  species  of  Leucorus  are 
found,  in  this  revision,  to  be  testaceous  and  specimens  of  the  subgenus  Orus 
to  be  castaneous  or  testaceous.  The  three  genera  are  separated  from  other 
Scopaeina  by  the  wide  neck. 

Originally  included  in  Leucorus  were  four  species:  L.  ferrugineus,  de¬ 
scribed  from  a  male  specimen;  L.  rubens,  from  a  male  and  female;  L. 
luridus,  from  a  female;  and  L.  ochrinus,  from  two  females.  Two  species, 
Orus  volans  and  Orus  cameroni,  were  described  and  included  in  Leucoi  us 
by  Blackwelder  (1943). 

Bernhauer  and  Schubert  (1912)  included  Leucorus,  Orus  and  Pycnorus 
as  subgenera  of  Scopaeus  Erichson.  Leng  (1920)  listed  these  three  ex¬ 
clusively  new  world  groups  as  separate  genera  but  Blackwelder  (1939a, 
1939b),  based  on  his  generic  revision  of  the  Paederini,  fixed  the  type- 
species  of  Leucorus,  Orus  and  Pycnorus  and  reduced  each  of  them  to  sub¬ 
genera  of  Orus  where  they  remain.  Orus  guatemalenus  Sharp,  1886  re¬ 
mained,  incorrectly,  in  Scopaeus,  was  emended  (unjustifiably)  to  S.  guate- 
malensis  (Bernhauer  and  Schubert,  1912),  and  listed  as  such  by  Black¬ 
welder  (1944). 

Measurements  used  in  this  paper  are  taken  as  follows:  the  width  is  of  the 
widest  portion;  the  length  of  the  head  is  from  the  anterior  portion  of  the 
clypeus  to  the  posterior  margin  of  the  head;  the  prothoracic  length  is  the 
greatest  dorsal  midline  length;  and  the  elytral  length  is  along  the  midline 
from  the  posterior  margin  of  the  scutellum  to  the  most  posterior  margin  of 
the  elytra. 

Acknowledgments.  I  thank  the  following  for  loans  of  material  used  in 
this  portion  of  the  revision:  Mr.  O.  L.  Cartwright  and  Dr.  P.  J.  Spangler, 
U.  S.  National  Museum;  Dr.  H.  J.  Grant,  Jr.,  Philadelphia  Academy  of 
Science;  Miss  C.  M.  R.  von  Hayek,  British  Museum  (Natural  History); 
Mr.  H.  B.  Leech,  California  Academy  of  Science  and  Dr.  M.  W.  Sanderson, 
Illinois  Natural  History  Survey. 


1  Department  of  Biology,  Catholic  University  of  America,  Washington  17,  D.C. 

2  One  species,  Orus  ( Pycnorus )  iowanus  (Casey,  1905),  has  a  prominent  gular 
tubercle.  The  male  is  unknown. 

3  a  male  of  an  undescribed  species  has  a  distinctly  bidentate  labrum  but  other 
known  males  of  this  subgenus  are  edentate. 

4  Females  should  be  identified  by  reference  to  illustrations  of  the  spermathecae  and 
ninth  terga  (figs,  ld-f,  2f-h,  3e-f). 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


113 


Key  to  the  Subgenera  of  Orus 


Mesosternal  fovea  present;  postorbital  setigerous  fovea  present  (fig.  2e)  _  2 

Mesosternal  fovea  absent;  eye  with  setigerous  furrow  near  eye  (fig.  5a) - NIVORUS 

Labrum  bidentate  or  edentate;  last  abdominal  sternum  of  male  deeply  and  narrowly 

incised  (fig.  la);  aedeagus  with  postforamen  present  (fig.  lb) - LEUCORUS 

Labrum  quadridentate;  last  abdominal  sternum  of  male  broadly  emarginate;  aedeagus 
with  postforamen  absent - - -  3 

Gular  tubercle  well-developed  on  male^;  metafemur  of  male  serrate  mesally - PYCNORUS 

Gular  tubercle  absent;  metafemur  not  serrate - ORUS 


Subgenus  Leucorus  Casey 

Leucorus  Casey,  1905:  191;  Bernhauer  and  Schubert,  1912:  245,  247, 
249,250,  251 ;  Leng,  1920:  104;  Blackwelder,  1939a:  24;  1939b*  98? 
105,  119;  1943:  230,  277,  278,  279;  1944:  119;  1952:  220  420! 
Arnett,  1961:  245,  269. 

TYPE-SPECIES:  Orus  rubens  (Casey,  1905).  Fixed  by  Blackwelder 
1939b:  1 19,  by  subsequent  designation. 

DESCRIPTION.  Head:  quadrilateral  appearance  in  dorsal  aspect,  sides  broadly 
arcuate,  truncate  posteriorly;  dorsum  punctate;  gena  minutely  sculptured;  ventral 
postgena  sparsely  punctate;  gula  with  microreticulate  sculpturing;  labrum  distinctly 
bidentate  (females)  to  edentate  or  bidentate5  (males),  median  emargination,  with 
long  setae,  right  mandible  quadridentate,  left  mandible  tridentate;  gular  sutures  with 
approximately  equal  divergence  at  anterior  and  posterior,  median  portion  nearly 
parallel,  gula  without  prominent  well-developed  tubercle;  eye  tapered  posteriorly 
(hg.  2e),  fuirow  present  above  eye;  postorbital  fovea  with  setigerous  tubercle. 
J  borax:  prothorax  with  distinct,  rounded  anterior  angles  on  apical  third;  pronotal 
punctation  distinct,  umbilicate,  median  area  impunctate;  anterior  prosternum  rugose; 
profemur  robust,  with  meso-ventral  ctenidia;  protibia  with  scopae;  mesopleuron  and 
mesosternum  with  reticulate  sculpturing;  mesosternum  with  large,  deep  fovea;  elytra 
indistinctly  punctate,  pleural  fold  present;  scutellum  sculptured;  metafemur  entire; 
metatibia  with  ctenidia  on  one  side  of  apex.  Abdomen:  punctulate;  sterna  of  female 
unmodified,  last  two  sterna  of  male  modified,  last  sternum  deeply  and  narrowly 
incised  (figs,  la,  2a,  3a),  mesal  margins  of  incision  reflexed.  Aedeagus:  bulbous 
median  lobe;  dorso-medial  parameres  prominent,  connate,  attenuate  distally:  with 
dorso-basal  median  foramen;  dorso-distal  ostium;  distal  elongation  of  median  lobe 
reflexed;  median  lobe  with  ventral,  ovate,  membranous  margined  sclerite  (figs  2d 
3d);  circoforamen  and  postforamen  present. 

DISTRIBUTION:  GUATEMALA;  UNITED  STATES  (Illinois,  Iowa, 
Arizona,  Kansas,  California,  Texas,  Utah,  Colorado,  New  Mexico). 

Included  in  the  material  used  in  this  description  of  the  subgenus  are 
three  specimens  of  an  undescribed  species  belonging  to  Leucorus.  One  of 
the  specimens  is  a  male  from  Del  Rio,  Texas;  the  other  two  are  females 
from  Devils  River,  Texas. 

Male  genitalia.  The  median  foramen  of  members  of  this  genus  is  more 
or  less  surrounded  by  heavy  sclerotization.  To  facilitate  description  of  the 
aedeagus,  the  structure  encircling  the  median  foramen  is  designated  here 
the  circoforamen.  Leucorus  has  an  additional  modification  of  the  circo- 
foramcn,  a  thick,  hooked  structure  distad  of  the  median  foramen  termed 
here  the  postforamen. 


114 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


Key  to  the  Described  Species  of  Leucorus 


1.  Abdominal  sterna  of  penultimate  and  last  visible  segments  modified - (Males)  2 

Abdominal  sterna  unmodified - ---.(Females-*) 

2.  Abdominal  sternum  of  penultimate  segment  without  pair  of  lacinia,  with  longitudinal 

median  furrow  (fig.  2a);  parameres  broader  than  median  lobe  (dorsal  aspect) 

(fig.  20  -  ^BENS 

Abdominal  sternum  of  penultimate  segment  with  paired  lacinia  (figs,  la,  3a); 

parameres  not  as  broad  as  median  lobe  (fig.  lc,  3c) -  3 

3.  Abdominal  sternum  of  penultimate  segment  with  margin  between  lacinia  produced 

(fig.  3a);  paired  postostial  lobes  present  on  aedeagus  (fig.  3c) - GUATEMALENUS 

Abdominal  sternum  of  penultimate  segment  between  lacinia  with  arcuate  margin 

(fig.  la);  postostial  lobes  of  aedeagus  absent - FERRUGINEUS 


Orus  (Leucorus)  rubens  (Casey) 

(Figs.  2a-h) 

Leucorus  rubens  Casey,  1905:194;  Leng  1920:104;  Blackwelder  1939b: 

119;  1943:277;  1952:220. 

Scopaeus  (Leucorus)  rubens  (Casey),  Bernhauer  and  Schubert  1912:251. 
Orus  (Leucorus)  rubens  (Casey),  Blackwelder  1939a:24;  1939b:  105. 

HOLOTYPE:  Iowa  (no  additional  data  on  label);  U.  S.  National  Mu¬ 
seum  type  number  38301;  male.  The  female  of  the  series  is  labeled  as  the 
type  but  the  original  description  is  of  a  male  with  a  female  mentioned  in 
the  discussion. 

DESCRIPTION  OF  THE  HOLOTYPE.  Leucorus;  male;  ferruginous.  Head: 
.60  mm.  long,  .60  mm.  wide;  dorsum  distinctly  punctate;  postgena  adjacent  to  gula 
deeply  and  distinctly  punctate;  submentum  rugose;  postorbital  fovea  well-defined; 
furrow  above  quite  evident  (fig.  2e).  Thorax:  prothorax  in  dorsal  aspect  .62  mm. 
long,  .55  mm.  wide,  sides  convergent  posteriorly;  anterior  median  posternum  glabrous; 
elytra  .57  mm.  long,  .58  mm.  wide.  Abdomen:  median  furrow  on  penultimate  ster¬ 
num,  lateral  margins  broadly  arcuate  and  with  moderately  heavy  setae;  posterior 
sternal  margin  emarginate,  with  setae  (fig.  2a).  Aedeagus:  median  lobe  .60  mm. 
long,  .20  mm.  wide;  postostial  lobes  absent;  parameres  with  median  portion  expanded 
laterally  to  nearly  as  broad  as  widest  portion  of  median  lobe,  obtusely  aculeate 
distally;  sides  of  circoforamen  convergent  posteriorly  (dorsal  aspect);  postforamen 
prominent  (fig.  2c);  gradual  deflection  from  postforamen  to  base  of  parameres 
(fig.  2b). 

DESCRIPTION  OF  THE  FEMALE.  Spermatheca:  figs.  2g-h.  Ninth  tergum  (fig. 

2f). 

DISTRIBUTION:  IOWA,  ILLINOIS  (Urbana,  Mayview),  KANSAS 
(Manhatten),  ARIZONA  (Santa  Rita  Mountains,  Chiricahua  Mountains). 

BIOLOGY:  At  about  5400  feet  specimens  were  taken  by  light  trapping 
and  from  the  ground  litter  at  South  Fork  Canyon  in  the  Chiricahua  Moun¬ 
tains  on  July  10  and  11,  1964.  Those  from  the  black  light  were  females; 
four  specimens,  two  of  them  males,  were  taken  from  the  ground  litter 
after  a  limited  area  had  been  saturated  repeatedly  with  water.  Others 
have  collected  this  species  from  ground  litter  in  the  Midwest  on  the  fol¬ 
lowing  dates:  October  15,  1944,  September  16,  1944,  August  29,  1943 
(Illinois);  October  2,  1936  (Kansas). 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


115 


VARIATION:  Most  specimens  are  dark  ferruginous  but  several,  par¬ 
ticularly  those  from  the  Midwest,  have  an  orange  cast  and  are  not  as  dark 
as  specimens  from  the  Southwest.  The  sternal  furrow  of  the  penultimate 
abdominal  segment  may  be  deep  with  very  distinct  lateral  margins  to 
shallow  with  indistinct,  rounded  margins;  the  lateral  margins  may  be 
broadly  arcuate,  parallel  or  posteriorly  divergent.  One  specimen  has  a 
longitudinal  prothoracic  impression.  The  anterior  gular  region  may  have  a 
small  fovea,  slight  tubercle  or  be  without  either  structure.  The  aedeagus 
exhibits  variation  in  reflection  of  the  apex  of  the  median  lobe  and  degree 
of  deflection  from  the  postforamen  to  the  base  of  the  parameres.  The 
spermathecae  of  specimens  from  S.E.  Arizona  are  similar,  though  smaller, 
to  that  of  O.  guatemalenus.  The  ninth  tergum  of  specimens  from  various 
localities  may  be  more  or  less  acute  anteriorly  but  in  no  case  examined  was 
the  O.  i ubens  type  of  spermatheca  associated  with  the  O.  ferrugineus  type 
of  ninth  tergum.  Size  variation  of  this  species  is  as  follows:  head  length 
.54  mm.-. 60  mm.,  width  .50  mm.-.60  mm.;  prothorax  length  .54  mm.- 
.64  mm.,  width  .47  mm.-. 59  mm.;  elytra  length  .55  mm. -.69  mm.,  width 
.56  mm. -.71  mm. 


Orus  (Leu corns)  ferrugineus  (Casey) 

(Figs,  la-f) 

Leucorus  ferrugineus  Casey,  1905:193;  Leng  1920:104. 

Scopaeus  (Leucorus)  ferrugineus  (Casey),  Bernhauer  and  Schubert  1912* 
247. 

Orus  (Leucorus)  ferrugineus  (Casey),  Blackwelder  1939a:24;  1939b:  105. 

Leucorus  luridus  Casey  1905:193;  Leng  1920:104.  (NEW  SYNONYMY). 

Scopaeus  (Leucorus)  luridus  (Casey),  Bernhauer  and  Schubert  1912:249. 

Orus  (Leucorus)  luridus  (Casey),  Blackwelder  1939a:24;  1939b:  105. 

Leucorus  ochrinus  Casey,  1905:193.  Leng  1920:104  (NEW  SYN¬ 
ONYMY). 

Scopaeus  (Leucorus)  ochrinus  (Casey),  Bernhauer  and  Schubert  1912:250. 
Orus  (Leucorus)  ochrinus  (Casey),  Blackwelder,  1939a:24;  1939b:  105. 

Holotype  of  Leucorus  ferrugineus  Casey:  Arizona;  U.  S.  National 
Museum  type  number  38299;  male. 

Holotype  of  Leucorus  luridus  Casey:  Southern  California;  U.  S.  Na¬ 
tional  Museum  type  number  38298;  female. 

Holotype  of  Leucorus  ochrinus  Casey:  Canon  City,  Colorado;  U.  S. 
National  Museum  type  number  38300;  female. 


DESCRIPTION  OF  THE  HOLOTYPE.  Leucorus;  male;  ferruginous.  Head:  .64 
mm.  long,  .62  mm.  wide;  dorsum  finely  punctate;  postgena  with  minute  sculpturing, 
indistinctly  punctate;  submentum  with  minute  reticulate  ground  sculpturing;  anterior 
gula  with  median  fovea;  furrow  above  eye  reduced;  margins  of  postorbital  fovea 
not  well-developed.  Thorax:  prothorax  .67  mm.  long,  .57  mm.  wide,  sides  parallel; 
elytra  .74  mm.  long,  .80  mm.  wide,  sides  divergent  posteriorly.  Abdomen:  penultimate 
sternum  with  lacinia  and  shallow,  smooth-bottomed,  median  depression;  posterior 


116 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


margin  of  depression  not  produced  between  lacinia;  depression  margined  laterally 
with  heavy  setae,  tapering  and  diminishing  anteriorly;  lacinia  short,  broad,  clothed 
with  heavy  setae  and  with  mesal  overlap  of  depression  (fig.  la).  Aedeagus:  median 
lobe  .56  mm.  long,  .20  mm.  wide;  postostial  lobes  absent;  parameres  acuminate, 
broadest  medially;  sides  of  circoforamen,  in  dorsal  aspect,  convergent  to  postforamen; 
deflection  from  postforamen  to  base  of  parameres  gradual  (figs,  lb,  c). 

DESCRIPTION  OF  THE  FEMALE.  Spermatheca:  fig.  le,  f.  Ninth  tergum:  fig.  Id. 

DISTRIBUTION:  ARIZONA  (Santa  Rita  Mountains,  Chiricahua 
Mountains,  Galiuro  Mountains,  Pajarito  Mountains  (Pena  Blanca);  CAL¬ 
IFORNIA  (Azusa,  Argus  Mountains,  Pasadena,  Panamint  Mountains, 
Kern  County);  UTAH  (American  Fork);  NEW  MEXICO  (Las  Vegas 
H.S.);  COLORADO  (Canon  City,  Colorado  Springs). 

COLLECTION  DATA:  Santa  Rita  Mountains  in  May;  Panamint  Moun¬ 
tains  in  April;  Chiricahua  Mountains  in  June  and  July;  Pena  Blanca  on 
July  26,  1964  at  a  black  light;  Galiuro  Mountains  in  May;  Azusa  in  Sep¬ 
tember;  Pasadena  in  February;  American  Fork  in  May. 

VARIATION:  The  color  varies  from  ferruginous  to  testaceous;  two 
testaceous  specimens  were  collected  at  the  same  time  and  place  (Chiricahua 
Mountains)  as  a  ferruginous  specimen.  Most  specimens  are  lacking  the 
gular  fovea  and  in  one  case  it  is  replaced  by  a  slight  tubercle.  The  depres¬ 
sion  of  the  penultimate  abdominal  sternum  of  the  male  may  have  nearly 
parallel  lateral  margins,  be  very  shallow  with  indistinct  lateral  margins,  or 
be  very  deep  and  distinctly  margined.  The  bottom  of  the  depression  may  be 
glabrous  or  partly  to  completely  covered  with  minute  ground  sculpture.  The 
length  and  width  of  the  lacinia  vary  moderately.  Variation  of  the  aedeagus 
is  in  the  degree  of  deflection  between  the  postforamen  and  base  of  the 
parameres.  No  variation  was  found  in  the  ninth  tergum  of  the  females  and 
the  spermatheca  varies  in  only  one  case.  In  the  type  specimen  of  O. 
ochrinus,  the  spatulate  portion  of  the  spermatheca  was  not  expanded 
laterally  as  much  as  in  the  paratype  from  the  same  locality  and  other 
females  of  O.  ferrugineus  but  the  ninth  tergum  of  the  holotype  does  not 
vary  from  that  of  the  other  females.  Size  variation  is  as  follows:  head 
length  .57  mm.-. 65  mm.,  width  .53  mm.-. 66  mm.;  prothorax  length  .58 
mm.-. 67  mm.,  width  .50  mm.-. 69  mm.;  elytra  length  .57  mm.-. 74  mm., 
width  .63  mm. -.75  mm. 


» - 

Figures  la-f,  Orus  ferrugineus.  a — Abdominal  sterna,  male;  b — Aedeagus,  lateral 

view;  c Aedeagus,  dorsal  view;  d — Ninth  tergum,  female;  e — Spermatheca,  basal 

end;  f — Spermatheca,  lateral  view. 

Figures  2a-h,  Orus  rubens.  a — Abdominal  sterna,  male;  b — Aedeagus,  lateral  view; 

c Aedeagus,  dorsal  view;  d — Aedeagus,  ventral  view;  e — Head,  lateral  view;  f — 

Ninth  tergum,  female;  g — Spermatheca,  basal  end;  h — Spermatheca,  lateral  view. 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


117 


Figures  5a-c,  Orus  volans.  a — Head,  lateral  view;  b — Spermatheca,  basal  end;  3 — 
^permatheca,  lateral  view. 


118 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


DISCUSSION:  Casey’s  O.  ochrinus  and  O.  luridus  have  been  syn- 
onymized  with  O.  jerrugineus  because  the  spermathecae  and  ninth  terga 
are  virtually  identical  with  those  of  females  determined  as  O.  jerrugineus 
taken  in  the  Panamint  Mountains,  an  area  which  seems  to  be  out  of  the 
range  of  O.  rubens  and  O.  guatemalenus.  In  his  original  descriptions,  Casey 
used,  “Elytra  much  longer  and  wider  than  the  prothorax”  for  O.  rubens 
and  “Elytra  subequal  in  length  to  the  prothorax  and  but  little  wider”  for 
O.  luridus ,  O.  ochrinus  and  O.  jerrugineus;  this  couplet  served  as  the  basis 
for  primary  separation  of  O.  rubens  from  the  others  (Casey  1905,  p.  192). 
In  a  series  of  O.  jerrugineus,  the  elytra  are  from  .067  mm.  longer  to  .067 
mm.  shorter  than  the  prothorax.  Specimens  of  O.  rubens  show  similar  re¬ 
sults.  Application  of  the  above  couplet  will  allow  certain  specimens  of 
either  species  to  be  keyed  to  the  wrong  species;  this  is  particularly  true 
of  females.  In  neither  the  original  descriptions  nor  the  type  specimens  is 
there  a  concrete  basis  for  distinction  of  O.  ochrinus  and  O.  luridus  from 
O.  jerrugineus.  Characters  used  in  the  original  descriptions  of  O.  ochrinus 
and  O.  luridus  can  be  shown  to  be  individual  variation  when  using  a  series. 


Or  us  (Leucorus)  guatemalenus  Sharp 
(Figs.  3a-f) 

Orus  guatemalenus  Sharp,  1886:549,  pi.  14,  fig.  3. 

Scopaeus  (Orus)  guatemalensis  Bemhauer  and  Schubert  1912:248.  (UN¬ 
JUSTIFIED  EMENDATION). 

Scopaeus  guatemalensis  Bernhauer  and  Schubert,  Blackwelder  1944:119. 

LECTOTYPE:  San  Geronimo,  Guatemala;  British  Museum  (Natural 
History);  male.  The  lectotype,  designated  here,  collected  by  Champion,  is 
the  only  perfect  male  of  the  syntypic  series. 

DESCRIPTION  OF  THE  LECTOTYPE.  Leucorus;  male;  ferruginous.  Head: 
.54  mm.  long,  .54  mm.  wide;  dorsum  distinctly  punctate;  submentum  rugose;  labrum 
slightly  produced  antero-laterally;  furrow  above  eye  quite  evident.  Thorax:  prothorax 
.60  mm.  long,  .59  mm.  wide,  sides  converging  posteriorly;  elytra  .67  mm.  long, 
.70  mm.  wide,  parallel  sides.  Abdomen:  posterior  margin  of  penultimate  sternum 
with  paired  lacinia,  with  smooth  surfaced  depression;  depression  broad  posteriorly; 
tapering  and  diminishing  anteriorly,  margined  laterally  by  heavy  setae,  posterior 
margin  slightly  produced  between  lacinia  (fig.  3a).  Aedeagus:  median  lobe  .56  mm. 
long,  .20  mm.  wide,  with  paired  postostial  lobes;  parameres  broad  medially,  obtusely 
aculeate  distally;  circoforamen  ellipsoidal  in  dorsal  aspect;  postforamen  prominent; 
abrupt  deflection  from  postforamen  to  parameres  (figs.  3b-d). 

DESCRIPTION  OF  THE  FEMALE.  Spermatheca:  fig.  3e,  f.  Ninth  tergum:  as 
in  fig.  2f. 

DISTRIBUTION:  GUATEMALA  (Duenas,  San  Geronimo). 

VARIATION:  Specimens  may  be  from  ferrugino-piceous  to  testaceous. 
But  for  a  deeper  median  labral  incision  and  the  unmodified  abdomen,  the 
three  females  do  not  differ  appreciably  from  the  males.  An  antero-median 
gular  fovea  is  present  on  one  specimen.  The  lacinia  of  the  abdomen  of 
the  males  vary  in  length  and  width.  Size  variation  is  as  follows:  head  length 
.54  mm. -.60  mm.,  width  .52  mm. -.60  mm.;  prothorax  length  .60  mm.- 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


119 


.64  mm.,  width  .52  mm.-. 59  mm.;  elytra  length  .67  mm.-.74  mm.,  width 
.67  mm. -.87  mm. 

DISCUSSION:  Characters  used  to  separate  O.  jerrugineus  and  O. 
guatemalenus  are  perhaps  questionable.  It  is  conceivable  that  the  char¬ 
acters  used  are  the  result  of  geographical  variation,  but  this  cannot  be 
verified  at  this  time  because  of  the  lack  of  specimens  from  Mexico. 


Subgenus  Nivorus  Herman,  NEW  SUBGENUS 


TYPE-SPECIES:  Orus  cameroni  Blackwelder.  Designated  here. 

DESCRIPTION.  Head:  quadrilateral  in  dorsal  aspect,  sides  broadly  arcuate,  slight¬ 
ly  emarginate  posteriorly;  dorsum  and  venter  very  feebly  punctulate;  labrum  with 
deep  median  emargination,  with  long  setae,  quadridentate,  mesal  denticles  prominent, 
lateral  denticles  reduced  to  prominent  (fig.  4f);  mandibular  dentition  variable  in 
number;  gular  sutures  divergent  anteriorly  and  posteriorly,  median  portion  nearly 
parallel;  gula  without  prominent  tubercle;  furrow  above  eye  absent  or  present,  when 
present  it  is  similar  to  that  of  fig.  5a;  setigerous  furrow  present  above  or  behind  eye 
(fig  5a);  postorbital  setigerous  fovea  absent;  eye  slightly  tapered  posteriorly.  Thorax: 
prothorax  with  distinct,  rounded  angles  on  apical  third,  pronotal  punctation  very 
feeble,  not  umbilicate,  fine  ground  sculpturing;  profemur  robust,  with  meso-ventral 
ctemdia;  protibia  with  scopae;  mesosternal  fovea  absent;  elytra  with  pleural  fold; 
metafemur  not  serrate;  metatibia  with  ctenidia  on  one  side  of  apex.  Abdomen: 
sterna  of  female  unmodified;  sterna  of  male  variously  modified.  Aedeagus:  median 
lobe  bulbous;  parameres  connate,  free  from  median  lobe  or  not;  median  foramen 

dorso-basal;  postforamen  present  or  not;  circoforamen  present;  ventral  ovular  sclerite 
absent. 

DISTRIBUTION:  WEST  INDIES  (Jamaica,  Cuba,  Barbados);  MEX¬ 
ICO  (Michoacan);  UNITED  STATES  (Arizona). 

DISC  USSION:  Included  in  the  material  used  for  the  above  description 
are  single  specimens  of  three  undescribed  species:  a  female  from  Barbados; 
a  female  from  Comanja,  Michoacan  and  a  male  from  Yuma,  Arizona. 

Originally  O.  volcins  and  O.  cameroni  were  placed  in  Leucorus  but  mem¬ 
bers  of  this  subgenus,  as  indicated  above,  are  distinguished  from  Orus  and 
Pycnorus  by  a  bidentate  or  edentate  labrum.  In  no  case  are  there  lateral 
denticles  as  on  O.  volans  and  O.  cameroni  (fig.  4f);  the  original  descrip¬ 
tions  refer  to  these  species  as  bidentate  with  minute  lateral  prominence  on 
the  labrum.  The  mandibular  dentition  of  Nivorus  is  variable  between  and 
within  species,  a  mesosternal  fovea  is  lacking,  a  setigerous  postorbital 
fovea  (fig.  2e)  is  replaced  by  a  rather  distinctive  furrow  containing  a  long 
seta.  Additional  variation  is  offered  by  an  undescribed  species  of  Nivorus 
in  which  the  last  sternum  is  broadly  emarginate  and  the  postforamen  lack¬ 
ing  The  male  genitalia  of  O.  cameroni  and  the  undescribed  species  both 
lack  a  ventral  ovular  sclerite  and  an  apical  ostium. 

In  general,  Nivorus  is  quite  variable  in  the  characters  used  to  define 
Leucorus;  since  taxa  should  be  defined  on  as  many  characters  as  possible, 
O.  volans  and  O.  cameroni  are  not  retained  in  Leucorus  on  the  basis  of  a 
questionable  labrum. 


120 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


1. 


Key  to  the  Described  Species  of  Nivorus 

Setigerous  furrow  behind  eye  contiguous  with  eye - 

Setigerous  furrow  behind  eye  separate  from  eye - 


CAMERONI 
— VOLANS 


Orus  (Nivorus)  earner  oni  Blackwelder 

(Figs.  4a-f) 

Orus  (Leucorus)  cameroni  Blackwelder  1943:278;  1944:119. 

HOLOTYPE:  Trinityville,  Jamaica;  U.  S.  National  Museum  type  num¬ 
ber  52420;  male. 

DESCRIPTION.  Nivorus;  male;  castaneous.  Head :  .34  mm.  long,  .30  mm.  wide; 
gula  with  fovea  on  anterior  portion;  setigerous  furrow  behind  and  contiguous  with 
eye;  sculpturing  very  feeble.  Thorax:  prothorax  .33  mm.  long,  .27  mm.  wide,  with 
longitudinal  midline,  feeble  ground  sculpturing;  prosternum  rugose;  elytra  .33  mm. 
long,  .38  mm.  wide,  very  minutely  punctulate;  mesosternum  and  mesopleuron  with 
reticulate  sculpturing:  Abdomen:  second  and  third  visible  sterna  with  a  transverse 
impression  each  with  a  ctenidia;  penultimate  sternum  with  posterior  margin  shallowly 
emarginate,  with  shallow  and  indistinct  furrow  containing  short,  heavy  setae,  last 
sternum  deeply  and  narrowly  incised,  mesal  margins  reflected  (fig.  4a).  Aedeagus. 
parameres  cylindrical,  expanded  apically;  circoforamen  and  prominent,  hooked  post¬ 
foramen  present;  long  sclerite  present  from  post  foramen  to  ventral  base  of  parameres; 
ostium  subapical. 

DESCRIPTION  OF  FEMALE.  Spermatheca:  figs.  4d-e. 

DISTRIBUTION:  JAMAICA  (Trinityville,  Troy,  Santa  Cruz,  Milk 
River,  Spanish  Town,  Fern  Gully,  Montego  Bay,  Moneague);  CUBA 
(Cayamas,  Baragua);  HISPANIOLA  (Haiti);  GRENADA. 

VARIATION:  The  anterior  portion  of  the  gula  may  have  a  fovea, 
slight  tubercle  or  be  without  either  structure.  One  mutilated  specimen  has  a 
slight  transverse  impression  on  the  mesosternum,  not  at  all  similar  to  the 
mesosternal  fovea  of  Leucorus.  Size  variation  is  as  follows:  head  length 
.33  mm.-. 37  mm.,  width  .30  mm.-.44  mm.;  prothorax  length  .34  mm.-.35 
mm.,  width  .27  mm.-.29  mm.;  elytra  length  .34  mm.-. 39  mm.,  width  .34 
mm. -.40  mm.  The  mandibular  dentition  is  variable  in  number. 


Orus  (Nivorus)  volans  Blackwelder 

(Figs.  5a-c) 

Orus  (Leucorus)  volans  Blackwelder  1943:277;  1944:119. 

HOLOTYPE:  Milk  River,  Jamaica;  U.  S.  National  Museum  type  num¬ 
ber  52422;  female. 

DESCRIPTION.  Nivorus;  testaceous;  female.  Head:  .37  mm.  long,  .32  mm.  wide; 
dorsum  and  venter  with  reticulate  ground  sculpturing;  setigerous  furrow  behind  eye 
not  contiguous  with  eye  (fig.  5a);  mandibles  tridentate.  Thorax:  prothorax  .36  mm. 
long,  .31  mm.  wide,  with  longitudinal  midline;  prosternum  feebly  rugose;  mesoster¬ 
num  with  reticulate  ground  sculpturing;  mesopleuron  without  reticulate  sculpturing, 
shining;  elytra  .37  mm.  long,  .38  mm.  wide,  punctate,  without  ground  sculpturing. 
Abdomen:  unmodified.  Spermatheca:  figs.  5b-c. 

The  male  of  this  species  is  unknown. 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


121 


DIS7  RIBUTION:  JAMAICA  (Milk  River,  Spanish  Town). 

VARIATION:  Size  variation  is  as  follows:  head  length  (no  variation), 
width  .32  mm.-. 34  mm.;  prothorax  length  .36  mm.-. 38  mm.,  width  .29 
mm.-. 31  mm.;  elytra  length  .37  mm.-.39  mm.,  width  .38  mm.-. 40  mm. 

Literature  Cited 


Arnett,  R.  H. 

1961.  The  Beetles  of  the  United  States.  Part  II.  Fascicle  15.  Staphylinidae  The 
Catholic  University  of  America  Press.  Washington,  D.C.  Pp.  1-1112.  Ulus. 

Bernhauer,  M.  and  K.  Schubert 

1912.  Staphylinidae  III.  Coleopterorum  Catalogus.  pars.  40.  Pp.  191-288. 

Blackwei.der,  R.  E. 

1939a.  Fourth  supplement  1933-1938  (inclusive)  to  the  Leng  Catalogue  of 
Coleoptera  of  America,  North  of  Mexico.  146  pp.  Mount  Vernon,"  N.  Y. 

1939b.  A  generic  revision  of  the  Staphylinid  beetles  of  the  tribe  Paederini.  Proc. 
U.  S.  Nat.  Mus.  87:93-125. 

1943.  Monograph  of  the  West  Indian  beetles  of  the  family  Staphylinidae.  Bull 
U.  S.  Nat.  Mus.  No.  182.  Pp.  658.  Ulus. 

1944.  Checklist  of  the  Coleopterous  Insects  of  Mexico,  Central  America 
the  West  Indies,  and  South  America.  Part  1.  Bull.  U.  S.  Nat  Mus  No 
185.  Pp.  1-188. 

1952.  The  generic  names  of  the  beetle  family  Staphylinidae  with  an  essay  on 
genotypy.  Bull.  U.  S.  Nat.  Mus.  No.  200.  Pp.  1-483. 

Casey,  T.  L. 

1905.  A  revision  of  the  American  Paederini.  Trans.  Acad,  of  Sci.  St  Louis 
15(2):  17-248. 

Leng,  C.  W. 

1920.  Catalogue  of  the  Coleoptera  of  America,  North  of  Mexico.  Mount 
Vernon,  N.  Y.  Pp.  1-470. 

Sharp,  D.  S. 

1886.  Staphylinidae.  Biol.  Centr.-Amer.  Ins.  Coleop.  1883-1887.  1(2):  145-747 
Pis.  5-19. 


RANGE  EXTENSION  FOR  TWO  INTRODUCED  DUNG  BEETLES 

(COLEOPTERA:  SCARABAEIDAE) 

On  April  25,  and  on  May  16,  1964,  at  Lynden,  Washington,  I  collected  in  dune  a 
total  of  twenty  Aphodius  fossor  L.  and  three  Onthophagus  nuchicornis  (L.),  so  de- 
termmed  by  Dr.  Melville  H.  Hatch.  Several  A.  fossor  were  likewise  taken  by  Mr 
David  Milne  at  Anderson  Island,  Washington,  on  April  24,  1964.  These  are  the 
nrst  records  for  these  European  species  in  Washington,  but  they  have  been  taken 
at  Creston,  B.  C.  and  in  Idaho. — Loren  Russell,  Zoology  Division,  University  of 
Washington,  Seattle,  Washington. 


122 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


STUDIES  ON  OXY GRYLIUS  CASEY 
(COLEOPTERA:  SC  ARAB  AEID  AE :  DYNASTINAE) 

By  Alan  Hardy1 

Oxygrylius  was  first  proposed  as  a  genus  by  Col.  Thomas  Casey  (1915  ) 
for  three  species,  two  described  as  new  at  that  time.  He  included  in  this 
genus  the  species  first  described  in  1856  by  LeConte  as  Ligyrus  ruginasus. 
Since  Casey’s  paper,  both  of  his  species  have  been  synonymized  with 
Oxygrylius  ruginasus.  O.  pimalis  Casey  was  placed  in  synonymy  by  Black- 
welder  (1944),  while  Saylor  (1946)  considered  O.  peninsularis  Casey 
conspecific  with  O.  ruginasus  (LeConte).  There  is  no  indication  that 
genitalia  were  extensively  studied  in  either  process,  although  Saylor  does 
figure  the  aedeagus  of  O.  ruginasus. 

In  the  1224  specimens  of  Oxygrylius  studied,  the  genitalia  of  635 
males  were  examined  and  form  the  basis  for  the  classification  presented 
here.  Because  of  this  work,  I  consider  Oxygrylius  Casey,  1915,  to  be  a 
subgenus  of  Bothynus  Hope,  1837. 

Specimens  were  borrowed  from  several  institutions  to  supplement  the 
specimens  at  hand.  I  am  indebted  to  the  following  for  loans  of  material  in 
their  care,  and  for  suggestions  on  the  project:  O.  L.  Cartwright,  United 
States  National  Museum;  H.  F.  Howden,  Canadian  Department  of  Agri¬ 
culture;  H.  B.  Leech,  California  Academy  of  Sciences;  E.  L.  Sleeper, 
California  State  College  at  Long  Beach;  R.  Snelling,  F.  Truxal  and  C. 
Hogue,  Los  Angeles  County  Museum.  1  would  especially  like  to  thank 
Dr.  H.  F.  Howden,  who  suggested  the  project,  and  Dr.  E.  L.  Sleeper,  who 
made  suggestions  that  aided  in  the  solution  of  some  of  the  problems  en¬ 
countered.  I  would  also  like  to  thank  O.  L.  Cartwright  and  P.  J.  Darlington 
(Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology,  Harvard  University)  for  the  informa¬ 
tion  on  the  types  in  their  care. 

Bothynus  subgenus  Oxygrylius  Casey,  NEW  STATUS 
Oxygrylius  Casey,  1915:208. 

Type  of  Subgenus:  Ligyrus  ruginasus  LeConte,  1856,  by  original  desig¬ 
nation. 

Morphology  and  Classification.  In  the  original  description  of  Oxygrylius, 
Casey  gave  the  following  characters  as  significant  in  distinguishing  his  new 
genus  from  Ligyrus  Burmeister,  1847  (U.  S.  species  now  Bothynus  Hope, 
1837):  “The  single  acute  denticle  of  the  clypeal  apex  and  the  more  or 
less  reduced  posterior  tooth  of  the  mandibles  .  .  .  the  thoracic  fovea  is  con¬ 
stantly  larger,  deeper,  and  is  always  at  least  partially  rugose  at  the 
bottom.” 

One  male  specimen  in  the  Los  Angeles  County  Museum  Collection 
(California,  Kern  Co.,  McKittrick  29-VIII-’49)  has  a  single  tooth  on  the 
apex  of  the  clypeus,  yet  the  rest  of  the  body  (including  the  aedeagus)  is 


1  Department  of  Entomology,  California  State  College  at  Long  Beach. 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


123 


that  of  a  specimen  of  Bothynus  gibbosus  obsoletus  LeConte.  The  specimen 
is  from  an  area  where  at  present  no  Oxygrylius  have  been  taken  and  so 
evidently  does  not  represent  a  hybrid,  but  it  probably  represents  a  mutation 
of  a  single  character,  showing  the  close  relationship  of  the  two  groups.  No 
other  malformations  of  the  clypeus  have  been  noted. 

There  is  variation  between  the  species  of  the  most  closely  related  group 
(Bothynus)  with  respect  to  the  thoracic  fovea,  and  the  character  as  seen  in 
Oxygrylius  is  not  extreme. 

The  male  genitalia  of  Oxygrylius  and  Bothynus  show  many  similarities 
and  are  not  of  such  difference  to  support  separate  genera  on  their  own 
merit. 

For  these  reasons  I  consider  Oxygrylius  not  distinct  enough  to  be  con¬ 
sidered  a  full  genus  and  recommend  that  it  be  given  subgeneric  rank  under 
Bothynus  Hope,  1837. 

Oxygrylius  appears  to  contain  two  sibling  species,  recognizable  mainly 
by  the  genitalia  of  the  males,  which  appear  to  hybridize  along  the  areas  of 
contact;  such  hybridization  is  apparent  in  the  male  genitalia  (see  fig.  3). 
Eleven  specimens  have  been  examined  which  are  considered  hybridsCThey 
bear  the  following  data:  CALIFORNIA:  San  Bernardino  Co.:  Providence 
Mountains  (3  males);  “Ibanpah”  (Ivanpah)  Mountains  (2  males); 
Needles  (1  male).  Riverside  Co.:  Joshua  Tree  National  Monument, 
(Cottonwood  Springs)  (1  male);  Chuckawalla  Mountains  (Red  Cloud 
Mine)  (2  males);  Chuckawalla  Mountains  (Irish  Wash)  (2  males). 

Oxygrylius  has  been  recorded  as  a  pest  in  Idaho  (Essig,  1936),  but  this 
was  probably  a  misidentification  of  Bothynus  gibbosus  (DeGeer),  per¬ 
haps  being  older  specimens  with  the  two  clypeal  teeth  worn  off. 

Ritcher  (1944)  described  the  larvae  of  Oxygrylius  ruginasus  from  two 
specimens  taken  in  Mississippi.  These  may  have  been  examples  of  another 
species  of  Dynastinae,  possibly  a  Bothynus,  as  Oxygrylius  is  not  recorded 
from  east  of  eastern  Texas. 


Bothynus  (Oxygrylius)  ruginasus  (LeConte),  NEW  COMBINATION 

(Figs.  2,  4) 

Ligyrus  ruginasus  LeConte,  1856:20;  Horn,  1875 : 143;  Bates,  1888-316 
Oxygrylius  ruginasus  (LeConte):  Casey,  1915:209;  Ritcher,  1944:27  fig 
79;  Blackwelder,  1944:255;  Saylor,  1946:44. 

Oxygrylius  pi  mat  is  Casey,  1915: 209 . 


Length  14  mm.  to  21  mm.,  width  7  mm.  to  11  mm.  Oblong,  shining,  reddish- 
brown  Clypeus  with  single  medial  tooth.  Clypeus  and  front  ^rugose,  the  rugae 
formed  by  irregular  pitting,  pits  becoming  scattered  at  occiput,  becoming  separated 
by  more  than  twice  their  own  width.  Frontal  carina  thinning  medially  and  laterally 
not  quite  extending  to  lateral  edges  of  front.  Pronotum  ^convex,  anteriorly  and 
laterally  margined.  Posterior  edge  slightly  sinuate,  not  margined.  Apical  angles  acute, 
posterior  angles  rounded.  Anterior  margin  with  well  developed  median  tubercle! 
greater  than  clypeal  tooth.  Posterior  to  this  tubercle  is  a  deep  fovea,  the  surface 
aving  a  punctation  similar  to  that  on  front.  Pits  becoming  scattered  at  edges  of 
fovea,  until  they  are  separated  by  at  least  their  own  diameters  on  rest  of  pronotum. 


124 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


Pits  at  margins  becoming  confluent,  resembling  in  texture  the  front  and  fovea. 
Scutellum  smooth  with  a  few  scattered  punctures.  Elytra  longer  than  wide,  about 
twice  as  long  as  pronotum;  fine  punctures  scattered  throughout  and  mixed  Wlth 
annular  punctures,  few  of  which  are  confluent,  the  coarse  punctures  finer  and  denser 
posteriorly.  Pygidium  moderately  punctate  throughout,  the  punctures  generally 
separated  by  at  least  their  own  diameters,  laterally  denser  in  corners.  Margin  on 
ventral  edge  widest  at  lateral  angles  of  pygidium  and  just  laterally  of  medial  point; 
narrower  between  (fig.  4).  Underside  quite  hairy,  prosternal  process  completely  so. 
Anterior  tibia  tridentate,  emarginations  between  teeth  deep,  with  pits  outside  longi¬ 
tudinal  row  of  setigerous  punctures.  Apex  of  hind  tibia  slightly  flared,  its  width 
approximately  one-third  to  one-half  length  of  tibia  measured  along  inner  ec*ge. 
Aedeagus  distinct  from  other  species,  but  with  minor  individual  variations  (fig.  2). 
Female  differs  from  male  in  having  pygidium  more  flattened,  and  in  not  having  an 
emargination  in  the  last  abdominal  sternite. 

TYPE:  Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology,  Harvard  University,  LeConte 
Collection. 

TYPE  LOCALITY:  Ringgold  Barracks,  Texas  (near  Rio  Grande  City, 
Starr  County). 

SPECIMENS  EXAMINED:  700  (351  males,  349  females). 

DISTRIBUTION:  Sonoran  desert  and  drier  areas  of  southwestern 
United  States  (except  most  of  California),  and  northern  and  western 
Mexico. 

UNITED  STATES.  CALIFORNIA;  San  Bernardino  Co.;  Needles; 
Providence  Mountains.  ARIZONA:  “Ariz.”;  “Canyon”;  “Canyon  Lake  ; 
Salford;  2  mi.  w.  Magna;  Santa  Catalina  Mountains  (Pepper  Sauce  Can¬ 
yon);  Baboquivari  Mountains.  Cochise  Co.:  Cochise;  Portal;  Lowell; 
Whetstone  Mountains  (Dry  Canyon  Sands  Ranch);  Huachuca  Mountains; 
Chiricahua  Mountains.  Gila  Co.:  Globe;  Miami;  Pinal  Mountains.  Graham 
Co.:  Geronimo.  Greenlee  Co.:  Clifton.  Maricopa  Co.:  Wickenburg;  Phoenix; 
Arlington;  Gillespies  Dam;  Gila  Bend;  Higley.  Pima  Co.:  Organ  Pipe 
Cactus  National  Monument  (Quitobaquito,  W.  Bates  Well,  Walls  Well 
Road,  Hockers  Well,  Headquarters);  Santa  Catalina  Mountains  (Agua 
Caliente  Ranch);  Tucson;  San  Xavier  Mission;  Ajo  Mountains  (Alamos 
Canyon).  Pinal  Co.:  Apache  Junction;  Oracle.  Santa  Cruz  Co.:  Santa  Rita 
Mountains  (Madera  Canyon);  Nogales;  “Washington  Mountains  near 
Nogales.”  Yavapai  Co.:  Prescott.  Yuma  Co.:  63  mi.  e.  Yuma.  NEW 
MEXICO:  Big  Dry  Creek.  Doha  Ana  Co.:  Pyramid  Peak;  Mesquite  (?). 
Hidalgo  Co.:  Lordsburg.  Sierra  Co.:  16.7  mi.  s.  Truth  or  Consequences. 
TEXAS:  “Cameron  Co.”;  “Welder  Wildlife  Refuge  (near  Sinton).” 
Brewster  Co.:  Big  Bend  National  Park  (Maverick,  Kingsville,  Boquillas, 
Panther  Junction,  Oak  Springs,  Chisos  Basin,  Hot  Springs);  Lajitas; 
Terlingua.  Cameron  Co.:  Esperanza  Ranch  (Brownsville).  Duval  Co.: 
San  Diego.  El  Paso  Co.:  El  Paso.  Hudspeth  Co.:  Sierra  Blanca.  Kimble  Co.: 
Junction  City.  Val  Verde  Co.:  Del  Rio.  Webb  Co.:  Laredo. 

MEXICO.  “Sonora”;  “Libertad”;  “Nu  Laredo.”  CHIHUAHUA:  Santa 
Eulalia.  COAHUILA:  Montlave;  Boquillas  del  Carmen.  DURANGO: 
Lerdo.  NAYARIT:  21  mi.  s.  Acaponeta.  NUEVO  LEON:  5  mi.  s. 
Monterrey;  Apodeca.  SINALOA:  Venoido;  “Venedie  (Venodio?);  Los 
Mochis;  Topolobampo;  10  mi.  s.  Guamachil;  35  mi.  n.  Guamachil;  18  mi. 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


125 


n.e.  San  Bias;  Mazatlan;  5  mi.  n.  Mazatlan;  7  mi.  n.  Mazatlan;  8  mi.  n. 
Mazatlan;  Vi  mi.  s.  Villa  Union;  3  mi.  n.e.  Villa  Union;  26  mi.  n.e.  Villa 
Union;  Rio  Piaxtala  (1  mi.  w.  Mex.  #15);  Culiacan;  Vinaterio.  SONO¬ 
RA:  Rio  Mayo;  “San  Bernardino,  Rio  Mayo”  (San  Bernardo?);  Her- 
mosillo;  36  mi.  n.  Hermosillo;  Posa;  25  mi.  s.  Llano;  Campo  Utah;  San 
Carlos  Bay;  Louis;  Saric;  Ciudad  Obregon;  Navajoa;  1  mi.  n.w.  Navajoa; 
La  Aduana;  2.1  mi.  w.  Alamos;  Magdalena;  Esperanza;  Valle  del  Yaqui’ 
El  Oasis  (45  mi  n.  Hermosillo). 

REM  ARKS:  The  genitalia  of  Casey’s  pimalis  seem  to  show  no  difference 
from  the  specimens  from  Texas,  and  the  author  agrees  that  this  should 
be  considered  a  synonym  of  B.  (O.)  ruginasus.  This  species  is  taken  from 
May  to  December  and  is  apparently  most  common  in  August.  Individuals 
of  this  species  are  readily  attracted  to  lights. 


126 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


Bothynus  ( Oxygrylius )  peninsularis  (Casey),  NEW  COMBINATION 

(Figs.  1,  5) 

Oxygrylius  peninsularis  Casey,  1915:209. 

This  species  is  nearly  identical  to  the  preceding,  except  in  the  male 
genitalia  (fig.  1)  and  the  following  variable  character.  Ventral  margin  of 
the  pygidium  usually  widest  only  at  the  lateral  angles,  becoming  increas¬ 
ingly  narrower  medially  (fig.  5). 

TYPE:  United  States  National  Museum  48598,  Casey  Collection. 

TYPE  LOCALITY:  San  Jose  del  Cabo,  Baja  California  Sur. 

SPECIMENS  EXAMINED:  513  (303  males,  210  females). 

DISTRIBUTION:  Southern  California  and  peninsula  of  Baja  California. 

UNITED  STATES.  NEVADA:  Lake  Mead.  CALIFORNIA:  “Cal.” 
San  Bernardino  Co.:  “Ibanpah  Mountains”  (Ivanpah  Mountains?);  Prov¬ 
idence  Mountains.  Riverside  Co.:  Palm  Springs;  Joshua  Tree  National 
Monument  (Sunrise  Well,  Lower  Covington  Flats,  Smithwater  Wash, 
Pinto  Wash  Well,  Cottonwood  Springs,  n.  side  Eagle  Mountain);  Chuck- 
awalla  Mountains  (Irish  Wash,  Red  Cloud  Mine).  San  Diego  Co.:  Borrego, 
San  Felipe;  Mason  Valley;  Vallecito.  Imperial  Co.:  Kane  Springs;  San 
Felipe  Creek  (near  Junction  Carrizo  Creek). 

MEXICO:  BAJA  CALIFORNIA  NORTE:  10  mi  s.  Catavina;  Valle 
Trinidad;  e.  base  Sierra  de  Juarez  below  La  Rumerosa.  BAJA  CALIFOR¬ 
NIA  DEL  SUR:  La  Paz;  15  mi.  w.  La  Paz;  25  mi.  w.  La  Paz;  Palmanita, 
Purissima;  Las  Parras;  Comondu;  10  mi.  s.w.  Comondu;  20  mi.  n.  Comon- 
du;  Triunfo;  6  mi.  n.  Triunfo;  San  Jose  del  Cabo;  10  mi.  s.w.  San  Jose  del 
Cabo;  Miraflores;  5  mi.  s.  Miraflores;  4  mi.  w.  San  Ignacio;  15  mi.  n.  San 
Ignacio;  45  mi.  n.  San  Ignacio;  50  mi.  n.  San  Ignacio;  Canipole;  10  mi.  s.w. 
Canipole;  Cabo  San  Lucas;  San  Vanancio;  Coyote  Cove  (Conception  Bay); 
San  Francisquito  Bay;  25  mi.  n.  Santa  Rosalia;  6  mi.  s.w.  Santiago;  4  mi.  n. 
Todos  Santos;  3  mi.  n.  San  Pedro;  5  mi.  w.  San  Bartolo;  50  mi.  s.  El  Arco; 
Ruffo  Ranch  (Isla  Cerralvo). 

REMARKS:  The  adults  of  this  species  are  active  from  late  June  to  late 
December,  and  are  taken  most  frequently  in  August  and  September.  A 
specimen  kept  in  captivity  lived  from  late  October  to  the  summer  months 
of  the  following  season,  in  the  adult  stage,  so  apparently  there  is  some 
overwintering  by  adults.  Early  records  of  this  species  may  represent  these 
adults.  This  species  is  frequently  collected  at  lights.  Evidently  the  adults 
spend  the  days  in  the  soil,  coming  to  the  surface  at  night  to  fly  about  in 
search  of  mates. 

Literature  Cited 

Bates,  H.  W. 

1888.  Biol.  Centr.-Amer.  Ins.  Coleop.  2(2):  1-432,  21  pis. 

Blackweldf.r,  R.  E. 

1944.  Checklist  of  the  coleopterous  insects  of  Mexico,  Central  America,  etc. 
Smithsonian  Inst.  Bull.  185,  pt.  2.,  p.  255. 


1964 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


127 


Casey,  T.  L. 

1915.  A  revision  of  the  American  species  of  Rutelinae,  Dynastinae,  and 
Cetonnnae.  Mem.  Coleop.  6:1-460. 

Essig,  E.  O. 

1936.  Insects  of  Western  North  America.  The  Macmillan  Co.  Pp.  M035,  illus. 

Horn,  G.  H. 

1875.  Synonymical  notes  and  description  of  new  species  of  North  American 
Coleoptera.  Trans.  Amer.  Ent.  Soc.  5:126-156,  illus. 

LeConte,  J.  L. 

1856.  Notice  of  three  genera  of  Scarabaeidae  found  in  the  United  States  Proc 
Acad.  Nat.  Sci.  Phil.  8:19-25. 

Richter,  P.  O. 

1944.  Dynastinae  of  North  America  with  descriptions  of  the  larvae  etc  Ken¬ 
tucky  Agric.  Expt.  Stn.  Bull.  467:1-56,  90  figs. 

Saylor,  L.  W. 

1946.  Synoptic  revision  of  the  United  States  scarab  beetles  of  the  subfamily 
Dynastmae,  No.  3:  Tribe  Oryctini  (part).  Jour.  Wash.  Acad.  Sci.  36(2)- 
41-45,  1  fig.  v 


H  * 1 


DESCRIPTION  OF  A  BRACHYPTEROUS  FIREFLY 
FEMALE  OF  THE  GENUS  PHOTINUS 
(COLEOPTERA:  LAMPYRIDAE)1 

By  James  E.  Lloyd2-  3 

In  the  revision  of  the  genus  Photinus  by  J.  W.  Green  (1956)  the  females 
of  seven  of  the  28  described  Nearctic  species  were  found  to  be  brachypter- 
ous  and  the  females  of  two  more  species  were  suspected  to  be  so.  No 
females  of  the  species  P.  frosti  Green  and  P.  tenuicinctus  Green  were  in 
collections  at  that  time.  On  June  29,  1964,  two  females  of  P.  tenuicinctus 
(fig.  1)  were  collected  at  Fayetteville,  Arkansas. 


|  This  investigation  was  supported  by  U.  S.  Public  Health  Service  Predoctoral 
Fellowship  No.  1-F1-GM-22, 196-01,  the  Sigma  Xi-RESA  research  fund,  and  the 
Bache  Fund,  Grant  No.  481. 

-  Department  of  Entomology,  Cornell  University,  Ithaca,  New  York. 

5  Grateful  acknowledgment  is  hereby  made  to  Mr.  John  W.  Green  of  The  Cal¬ 
ifornia  Academy  of  Sciences  for  reading  the  manuscript. 


128 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  18 


Photinus  tenuicinctus  Green,  FEMALE.  Brachypterous,  texture  firm.  Eyes  small, 
separated  by  more  than  diameter  of  eye.  Pronotum  with  piceous  central  spot 
slightly  narrowing  posteriorly,  nearly  attaining  base  and  diffusing  anteriorly  without 
reaching  apex;  rectangular  area  each  side  of  central  spot  fulvous;  pronotal  margin 
flavate  and  weakly  translucent  laterally  and  anteriorly.  Base  of  scutellum  and 
mesonotal  areas  piceous,  scutellum  pale  in  about  apical  half.  Elytra  black,  extend¬ 
ing  slightly  beyond  apical  margin  of  first  abdominal  tergite;  sutural  bead  and  lateral 
margins  pale  fulvous,  continuously  around  apex.  Abdomen  above  piceous  black, 
pygidium  perceptibly  lighter.  Ventral  abdominal  segments  2-5,  7  brown,  6  pale, 
luminous  in  median  third,  8  flavate.  Length  9.5  and  11.5  mm. 


Figure  1.  Photinus  tenuicinctus,  brachypterous  female,  length  9.5  mm. 


The  species  P.  tenuicinctus,  P.  brimleyi  Green,  and  P.  punctulatus 
LeConte  are  closely  related  and  form  a  natural  group  within  the  genus.  The 
females  now  in  collections  may  be  separated  by  the  following  key. 

1.  Pronotum  with  central  dark  spot;  pronotum  with  median  longitudinal  impression  or 

carina;  body  texture  firm;  pronotum  narrowly  rounded  anteriorly - - - -  2 

Pronotum  without  central  dark  spot;  pronotum  without  median  longitudinal  impres¬ 
sion  or  carina;  body  texture  soft;  pronotum  broadly  rounded  anteriorly -  BRIMLEYI 

2.  Pronotum  punctate  (individual  pits  usually  clearcut  and  well  defined);  pronotal  spot 

narrowinq  posteriorly  (wedge-shaped);  pronotum  with  median  impressed  longitudinal 
,jne  _ PUNCTULATUS 

Pronotum  not  punctate  (individual  pits  ocassionally  seen  but  usually  obscured  by 
surface  irregularities);  pronotal  spot  only  slightly  narrowing  posteriorly;  pronotum 
with  median  longitudinal  carina  in  basal  half  -  TENUICINCTUS 

Because  of  the  limited  number  of  specimens  available  it  is  impossible 
to  know  the  general  value  of  the  key  characters  given.  For  example, 
males  of  P.  brimleyi  do  have  a  pronotal  spot  and  the  absence  of  it  in  the 
two  females  now  present  in  collections  may  not  reflect  the  general  condition. 


Literature  Cited 


Green,  J.  W. 

1956.  Revision  of  the  nearctic  species  of  Photinus  (Lampyridae:  Coleoptera). 
Proc.  California  Acad.  Sci.  28(15) : 56 1  -6 1 3 ,  19  figs. 


-BACK  ISSUES 

The  Coleopterists'  Bulletin 


Per 

Single 

Volume 

Issue 

Vol.  3,  1949,  6  issues 

(Nos.  i  &  2  o.p.;  $5.00 

$1.00 

Vol.  4,  1950,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol.  5,  1951,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol.  6,  1952,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol.  7,  1953,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol.  8,  1954,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol.  9,  1955,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol.  10,  1956,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol.  11,  1957,  2  issues 

5.00 

3.00 

Vol.  12,  1958,  1  issue 

5.00 

5.00 

Vol.  13,  1959,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol.  14,  1960,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol.  15,  1961,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol.  16,  1962,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol.  17,  1963,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

(above  prices  Postpaid) 


. ATTENTION  READERS! . 

From  time  to  time  we  receive  requests  from  our  subscribers  who 
wish  to  complete  their  holdings  of  the  Bulletin.  We  would  appre¬ 
ciate  it  if  any  readers  possessing  copies  of  Vol.  3,  No.  1,  with  which 
they  are  willing  to  part,  would  inform  the  Bulletin. 


★ 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 

620  Michigan  Avenue,  N.E. 
Washington  17,  D.  C. 


Send  today  for  your  copy  of— 

"PYGMIES  AND  PYGMOIDS: 

TWIDES  OF  TROPICAL  AFRICA* 

BY 

Martin  Gusinde,  S.V.D. 

JANUARY  1955  ISSUE  OF 
ANTHROPOLOGICAL  QUARTERLY 

•  This  interesting  and  educational  article  is 
based  on  the  author’s  original  observations, 
and  includes  a  complete  bibliography  on  the 
“PYGMIES.” 

Price:  $1.00  Postpaid 
Anthropological  Quarterly 
620  Michigan  Avenue,  N.E.,  Washington  17,  D.  C. 


Now  in  its  37th  year  — 

Anthropological  Quarterly 

(formerly  Primitive  Man) 

Issued  January,  April,  July  and  October 

Some  Recent  Contents: 

Grasshoppers  as  Food  in  Buhaya . P.  O.  Mors 

A  Pygmy  Group  Newly  Discovered  in  New  Guinea.  .Martin  Gusinde 

Eskimo  Reindeer  Herding . Robert  T.  Anderson 

Rock  Paintings  of  South  Africa . Abbe  Henri  Breuil 

The  Assinboin  Horse  Medicine  Cult . John  C.  Ewers 

Treatment  of  Disease  in  the  New  Guinea  Highlands 

Louis  J.  Luzbetak 

(Articles  on  Physical  and  Cultural  Anthropology) 

Subscription  Price  $4.00  a  year  Single  Issues  $1.00 

Anthropological  Quarterly 

620  Michigan  Ave.,  N.E.  Washington  17,  D.  C. 


The  Coleopterists’  Bulletin 


A  QUARTERLY  PUBLICATION  DEVOTED  TO  THE  STUDY  OF  BEETLES 


VOLUME  19,  1965 


Published  by 


THE  CATHOLIC  UNIVERSITY  OF  AMERICA  PRESS 
WASHINGTON,  D.  C.  20017 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS’  BULLETIN 

Founded  1947  by  Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr. 

The  Coleopterists’  Bulletin  is  published  by  The  Catholic  University  of  America 
Press,  Washington,  D.  C.  20017  and  edited  by  T.  J.  Spilman.  It  is  issued  four  times  a 
year  beginning  with  March.  All  business  matters  should  be  addressed  to  The  Cole¬ 
opterists’  Bulletin  at  the  Press.  Manuscripts  and  other  editorial  matter  should  be 
addressed  to  the  editor,  U.  S.  National  Museum,  Washington,  D.  C.  20560. 


Subscriptions:  The  subscription  price  for 
each  annual  volume  of  four  numbers  is 
$5.00  payable  in  advance.  All  sub¬ 
scriptions  begin  with  the  first  issue  of 
the  year  and  those  subscribing  later  in 
the  year  will  receive  the  back  issues  of 
the  volume. 


Back  volumes:  A  stock  of  back  volumes 
is  maintained  and  may  be  purchased  as 
follows:  3  to  date,  $5.00  ea.;  single  num¬ 
bers,  $1.25  each;  all  prices  postpaid. 
Missing  numbers:  Issues  lost  in  the  mail 
will  be  supplied  free  of  charge  if  notified 
within  three  months  after  mailing. 


EDITORIAL  BOARD 


Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr.,  Ph.D. 

Department  of  Biology 
Catholic  University  of  America 

O.  L.  Cartwright 

U.  S.  National  Museum 
Washington,  D.  C.  20560 

Eugene  J.  Gerberg,  Ph.D. 

Insect  Control  and  Research,  Inc. 
Baltimore,  Md. 


James  A.  Magner,  Ph.D.,  S.T.D. 

Business  Manager  of  the  Bulletin 
Catholic  University  of  America 

Theodore  J.  Spilman 

U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture 
Washington,  D.  C.  20560 

Eileen  R.  Van  Tassell 

Department  of  Biology 
Catholic  University  of  America 


NOTICE  TO  AUTHORS 


Manuscripts  will  be  considered  ONLY 
FROM  SUBSCRIBERS.  Authors  should 
consult  STYLE  MANUAL  FOR  BIO¬ 
LOGICAL  JOURNALS,  prepared  by  the 
Committee  on  Form  and  Style  of  the  Con¬ 
ference  of  Biological  Editors,  and  pub¬ 
lished  by  the  American  Institute  of  Bio¬ 
logical  Sciences,  2000  P  St.,  N.W.,  Wash¬ 
ington,  D.  C.  20006.  The  Bulletin  requires 
that  all  manuscripts  be  prepared  according 
to  instructions  in  the  Style  Manual.  Illus¬ 
trations  should  be  sent  mounted,  and 
numbered.  The  manuscript  should  be 
marked  to  indicate  the  location  of  text 
figures  or  the  position  of  full  page  plates. 

Manuscripts  will  be  acknowledged  upon 
receipt.  As  soon  as  possible  thereafter  the 
author  will  be  notified  as  to  acceptance 
after  review  by  the  Editorial  Board.  If 
the  manuscript  is  accepted,  a  tentative 
date  of  publication  will  be  set.  In  general, 


all  papers  will  be  published  in  their  order 
of  receipt,  but  the  editor  reserves  the  right 
to  use  articles  out  of  order  in  the  interest 
of  a  balanced  magazine. 

The  editor  will  make  no  text  changes 
without  advanced  notice  to  the  author. 
Galley  proof  will  be  sent  for  correction. 
These  galleys  are  sent  out  well  in  advance 
and  do  NOT  indicate  the  date  or  order  of 
publication. 

Twenty-five  tear  sheets  of  one  page 
notes  will  be  supplied  free  to  the  author  if 
requested  when  returning  galley  proofs. 
Reprints  of  articles  printed  free  of  extrane¬ 
ous  matter  will  be  supplied  with  or  with¬ 
out  covers  at  cost.  Reprints  MUST  be 
ordered  on  the  form  provided  when  re¬ 
turning  galley  proofs.  The  approjtimate 
cost  of  reprints  will  be  supplied  with  this 
form. 


EDITORIAL  POLICY 

Any  article,  note,  or  news  items  likely  cases ,  descriptions  of  new  species  must  be 
to  be  of  interest  to  readers  of  the  Bulletin  illustrated.  Descriptions  of  new  species  or 
will  be  considered.  Articles  with  illustra-  genera  MUST  contain  keys  or  be  corre- 
tions  are  particularly  desired,  and  in  all  lated  with  existing  keys. 


TABLE  OF  CONTENTS 

Volume  19,  1965 


BiOLOGY 


Ball,  G.  E.,  Two  new  subgenera  of  Pterostichus  Bonelli  from  western  United 
States,  with  notes  on  characteristics  and  relationships  of  the  subgenera 
Paraferonia  Casey  and  Feronina  Casey  (Coleoptera:  Carabidae) .  104 

Barr,  T.  C.f  Jr.,  A  new  cavernicolous  sphodrine  from  Veracruz,  Mexico  (Cole¬ 
optera:  Carabidae) .  55 

Brown,  W.  J.,  A  hydrophilid  new  to  North  America  (Coleoptera:  Hydrophilidae)  31 

Campbell,  J.  M.,  A  revision  of  the  genus  Charisius  (Coleoptera:  Alleculidae) .  43 

Erwin,  T.  L.,  A  revision  of  Brachinus  of  North  America:  Part  I.  The  California 

species  (Coleoptera:  Carabidae) .  X 

Gillogly,  L.  R.,  Aphenolia  monogcima  (Crotch),  a  new  combination  (Nitidulidae: 

Coleoptera) .  20 

Graves,  R.  C.,  Observations  on  the  ecology,  behavior  and  life  cycle  of  the  fungus¬ 
feeding  beetle,  Cypherotylus  calif ornicus,  with  a  description  of  the  pupa  (Cole¬ 
optera:  Erotylidae) .  X17 

Herman,  L.  H.,  Jr.,  Revision  of  Ovus.  II.  Subgenera  Orus,  Pycnorus  and  Nivorus 


(Coleoptera:  Staphylinidae) .  73 

Hicks,  S.  D.,  The  northern  limits  of  several  species  of  Coleoptera  with  special 

reference  to  their  occurrence  in  the  Ottawa  District,  Ontario .  37 

Jerath,  M.  L.,  and  K.  L.  Unny,  Larvae  of  six  genera  of  Cetoniinae  from  eastern 

Nigeria  (Coleoptera:  Scarabaeidae) .  59 

- .Larvae  of  six  species  of  genus  Aphodius  from  eastern  Nigeria 

(Coleoptera:  Scarabaeidae) .  9X 

Kingsolver,  J.  M.,  A  new  fossil  bruchid  genus  and  its  relationships  to  modern 

genera  (Coleoptera:  Bruchidae:  Pachymerinae) .  25 


— - On  the  genus  Abutiloneus  Bridw^ell  (Coleoptera:  Bruchidae)....  125 

McDermott,  F.  A.,  Ihe  new  combination  Lucidota  armata  and  a  note  on  Lucidota 


eucera  (Coleoptera:  Lampyridae) .  21 

Miller,  D.  C.,  Three  nevr  species  of  Crenitis  from  the  Pacific  Northwest  (Cole¬ 
optera:  Hydrophilidae) .  33 

Moore,  I.,  The  genera  of  the  Staphylininae  of  America  north  of  Mexico  (Cole¬ 
optera:  Staphylinidae) .  97 

Triplehorn,  C.  A.,  Notes  on  two  important  collections  of  Coleoptera  in  Brazil.  57 


V  arner,  R.  E.,  Hyperodes  anthradnus  (Dietz)  damaging  golf  greens  (Coleoptera: 


Curculionidae) .  32 

White,  R.  E.,  Taxonomic  and  distribution  notes  on  Anobiidae  (Coleoptera) .  113 

Zimmerman,  E.  C.,  Illustrations  of  three  Himalayan  Amara  (Coleoptera:  Cara¬ 
bidae): .  123 


Beetle  Talk .  31,  32,  90,  124 

Book  Review .  23,  24 

Literature  Notice .  19,  23,  24,  42,  72,  96, 

103,  116,  122,  128 

Notice .  31,  32,  42,  72 

LIST  OF  MEW  TAX  A  PROPOSED  IN  VOLUME  19,  1965 

Brachinus  favicollis  Erwin,  n.  sp.  (Carabidae) .  11 

Brachinus  gebhardis  Erwin,  n.  sp.  (Carabidae) .  6 

Brachinus  imperialensis  Erwin,  n.  sp.  (Carabidae) .  17 

Brachinus  pallidus  Erwin,  n.  sp.  (Carabidae) .  8 

Brachinus  velutinus  Erwin,  n.  sp.  (Carabidae) .  17 

Charisius  mexicanus  Campbell,  n.  sp.  (Alleculidae) .  49 

Crenitis  malkini  Miller,  n.  sp.  (Hydrophilidae) .  35 

Crenitis  palpalis  Miller,  n.  sp.  (Hydrophilidae) .  36 

Crenitis  snoqualmie  Miller,  n.  sp.  (Hydrophilidae) .  35 

Dorcatoma  falli  White,  n.  sp.  (Anobiidae) .  114 

Melvilleus  Ball,  n.  subgen.  of  Pterostichus  (Carabidae) .  110 

Mexisphodrus  Barr,  n.  gen.  (Carabidae) .  66 

Mexisphodrus  veraecrucis  Barr,  n.  sp.  (Carabidae) .  66 

Oligobruchus  Kingsolver,  n.  gen.,  fossil  (Bruchidae) .  26 

Orus  (. Nivorus )  surinamensis  Herman,  n.  sp.  (Staphylinidae) .  87 

Orus  (Orus)  hemilobatus  Herman,  n.  sp.  (Staphylinidae) .  79 

Orus  (Orus)  sinuatus  Herman,  n.  sp.  (Staphylinidae) .  78 

Pseudoferonia  Ball,  n.  subgen.  of  Pterostichus  (Carabidae) .  107 

Tricorynus  lepesmei  White,  n.  name  (Anobiidae) .  115 

DATES  OF  PUBLICATION  OF  VOLUME  19,  1965 

March  (No.  1),  pp.  1-32,  April  23,  1965. 

June  (No.  2),  pp.  33-64,  August  31,  1965. 

September  (No.  3),  pp.  65-96,  October  7,  1965. 

December  (No.  4),  pp.  97-128,  December  30,  1965. 


1 


\  (dul 


VOLUME  19  MARCH  \)^1965 

,-C.Pa 

4  1S68  - 

BRUCHIDAE:  New  fossil  genus,  &y  Kingsolver .  25 

CARABIDAE:  Brachinus  I,  6y  Erwin .  \ 

CURCULIONID AE :  Hyperodes  anthracinus,  by  Warner .  32 

HYDROPHILIDAE :  New  occurence,  by  Brown .  31 

LAMPYRIDAE:  Lucidota  armata  and  eucera,  by  McDermott.  21 
NITIDULIDAE:  Aphenolia  monogama,  by  Gillogly .  20 

Beetle  Talk  .  32 

Book  Review .  23  24 

Literature  Notice .  19  23  94 

Notice  . 31,’  32 


THE  CATHOLIC  UNIVERSITY  OF  AMERICA  PRESS 
WASHINGTON  17,  D.  C.  ; 


A  Quarterly  Publication  Devoted 
to  the  Study  of  Beetles 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS’  BULLETIN 

Founded  1947  by  Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr. 

The  Coleopterists’  Bulletin  is  published  by  The  Catholic  University  of  America 
Press,  Washington,  D.  C.  20017  and  edited  by  T.  J.  Spilman.  It  is  issued  four  times  a 
year  beginning  with  March.  All  business  matters  should  be  addressed  to  The  Cole¬ 
opterists’  Bulletin  at  the  Press.  Manuscripts  and  other  editorial  matter  should  be 
addressed  to  the  editor,  U.  S.  National  Museum,  Washington,  D.  C.  20560. 


Subscriptions:  The  subscription  price  for 
each  annual  volume  of  four  numbers  is 
$5.00  payable  in  advance.  All  sub¬ 
scriptions  begin  with  the  first  issue  of 
the  year  and  those  subscribing  later  in 
the  year  will  receive  the  back  issues  of 
the  volume. 


Back  volumes:  A  stock  of  back  volumes 
is  maintained  and  may  be  purchased  as 
follows:  3  to  date,  $5.00  ea.;  single  num¬ 
bers,  $1.25  each;  all  prices  postpaid. 
Missing  numbers:  Issues  lost  in  the  mail 
will  be  supplied  free  of  charge  if  notified 
within  three  months  after  mailing. 


EDITORIAL  BOARD 


Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr.,  Ph.D. 

Department  of  Biology 
Catholic  University  of  America 

O.  L.  Cartwright 

U.  S.  National  Museum 
Washington,  D.  C.  20560 

Eugene  J.  Gerberg,  Ph.D. 

Insect  Control  and  Research,  Inc. 
Baltimore,  Md. 


James  A.  Magner,  Ph.D.,  S.T.D. 

Business  Manager  of  the  Bulletin 
Catholic  University  of  America 

Theodore  J.  Spilman 

U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture 
Washington,  D.  C.  20560 

Eileen  R.  Van  Tassell 

Department  of  Biology 
Catholic  University  of  America 


NOTICE  TO  AUTHORS 


Manuscripts  will  be  considered  ONLY 
FROM  SUBSCRIBERS.  Authors  should 
consult  STYLE  MANUAL  FOR  BIO¬ 
LOGICAL  JOURNALS,  prepared  by  the 
Committee  on  Form  and  Style  of  the  Con¬ 
ference  of  Biological  Editors,  and  pub¬ 
lished  by  the  American  Institute  of  Bio¬ 
logical  Sciences,  2000  P  St.,  N.W.,  Wash¬ 
ington,  D.  C.  20006.  The  Bulletin  requires 
that  all  manuscripts  be  prepared  according 
to  instructions  in  the  Style  Manual.  Illus¬ 
trations  should  be  sent  mounted,  and 
numbered.  The  manuscript  should  be 
marked  to  indicate  the  location  of  text 
figures  or  the  position  of  full  page  plates. 

Manuscripts  will  be  acknowledged  upon 
receipt.  As  soon  as  possible  thereafter  the 
author  will  be  notified  as  to  acceptance 
after  review  by  the  Editorial  Board.  If 
the  manuscript  is  accepted,  a  tentative 
date  of  publication  will  be  set.  In  general, 


all  papers  will  be  published  in  their  order 
of  receipt,  but  the  editor  reserves  the  right 
to  use  articles  out  of  order  in  the  interest 
of  a  balanced  magazine. 

The  editor  will  make  no  text  changes 
without  advanced  notice  to  the  author. 
Galley  proof  will  be  sent  for  correction. 
These  galleys  are  sent  out  well  in  advance 
and  do  NOT  indicate  the  date  or  order  of 
publication. 

Twenty-five  tear  sheets  of  one  page 
notes  will  be  supplied  free  to  the  author  if 
requested  when  returning  galley  proofs. 
Reprints  of  articles  printed  free  of  extrane¬ 
ous  matter  will  be  supplied  with  or  with¬ 
out  covers  at  cost.  Reprints  MUST  be 
ordered  on  the  form  provided  when  re¬ 
turning  galley  proofs.  The  approximate 
cost  of  reprints  will  be  supplied  with  this 
form. 


EDITORIAL  POLICY 

Any  article,  note,  or  news  items  likely  cases,  descriptions  of  new  species  must  be 
to  be  of  interest  to  readers  of  the  Bulletin  illustrated.  Descriptions  of  new  species  or 
will  be  considered.  Articles  with  illustra-  genera  MUST  contain  keys  or  be  corre- 
tions  are  particularly  desired,  and  in  all  lated  with  existing  keys. 


A  QUARTERLY  PUBLICATION  DEVOTED  TO  THE  STUDY  OF  BEETLES 

The  Coleopterists’  Bulletin 

Volume  19  March  (No.  1)  1965 


A  REVISION  OF  BRACHINUS  OF  NORTH  AMERICA: 
PART  I.  THE  CALIFORNIA  SPECIES 
(COLEOPTERA:  CARABIDAE) 

By  Terry  L.  Erwin' 

Introduction 

The  most  recent  revision  of  this  genus  for  North  America  was  that  by 
John  L.  LeConte  (1862:523).  Blatchley  (1910:157)  used  LeConte’s 
work  as  the  basis  for  his  own  treatment  of  Brachinus  in  his  monumental 

Coleoptera  of  Indiana.  The  species  of  these  “bombardier  beetles”  have 
been  confused  for  many  years  because  of  their  extreme  similarity  and  no 
recent  revision  has  been  attempted.  The  original  descriptions  in  most  cases 
are  not  very  definitive,  usually  stating  that  the  species  are  iron-red  with 
blue  elytra,  and  seldom  offering  any  really  reliable  differentiating  characters. 

George  E.  Ball  (1960:164)  echoes  the  attitude  of  most  contemporary 
entomologists  when  he  says:  “The  taxonomy  of  the  North  American  species 
of  this  group  is  very  poorly  understood  and  it  is  almost  a  waste  of  time  at 
present  to  attempt  to  determine  individuals  to  species.” 

The  present  paper  deals  primarily  with  the  taxonomy  and  distribution 
of  Brachinus  in  California.  Subsequent  articles  will  stress  the  ecology, 
biology,  and  behavior  of  these  beetles.  This  study  is  preliminary  to  a 

revision  of  all  New  World  species,  which  will  require  several  more  years 
to  complete. 

The  taxonomic  characters  remain  quite  constant  throughout  the  entire 
range  of  each  species.  Even  the  color  characteristics  seem  to  be  reliable  in 
more  than  95%  of  the  7,000  specimens  studied  during  this  investigation. 
Alter  the  small  but  constant  morphological  differences  are  recognized, 
reliable  determinations  can  easily  be  made  of  both  sexes  of  all  known 
California  “bombardier  beetles.” 

The  male  genitalic  structures  are  of  great  taxonomic  value  in  most 
species,  but  many  supplemental  differences  have  also  been  utilized  in  this 
revision.  The  nature  of  the  elytral  pubescence  is  one  of  the  most  easily 
recognized  differentiating  characters.  The  variation  ranges  from  nearly 
entirely  glabrous  (in  B.  costipennis  Motschulsky)  to  completely  and 
densely  pubescent  (in  several  of  the  desert  forms).  The  color  of  the  mes- 
episterna,  the  abdomen,  the  various  antennal  segments  (and  even  the 
elytra,  in  the  case  of  B.  lateralis  Dejean)  provide  many  excellent  recogni- 

1  San  Jose  State  C  ollege,  San  Jose,  California. 


2 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


tion  characters.  The  females  of  the  various  species  differ  from  the  males, 
only  in  their  wider  and  less  convex  elytra  and  the  shape  of  the  last  tergi  e 
which  is  visibly  modified  in  the  male. 


Dissecting  Techniques 

As  in  most  carabids,  the  aedeagus  is  easily  removed  from  fresh  or  relaxed 
specimens  without  damaging  them.  The  phallus  (with  accompanying  para- 
meres)  should  be  placed  in  cold  10%  KOH  for  12  hours,  to  dissolve  the 
muscle  tissue.  These  structures  are  heavily  sclerotized,  therefore,  they  are 
not  visibly  distorted  by  cold  10%  KOH  even  after  submersion  for  18 
hours.  The  terminalia  should  be  removed  from  the  KOH,  washed  in  dilute 
acetic  acid,  then  placed  in  clove  oil  for  12  hours  to  “dear  the  walls  of 
the  aedeagus.  The  completely  prepared  terminalia  should  then  be  placed 
in  70%  ethyl  alcohol  vials  which  are  themselves  kept  inverted  in  larger 
iars  of  alcohol  (to  prevent  accidental  destruction  by  evaporation  ot  the 
alcohol  in  the  small  vials).  Following  this  clearing  technique  the  sclerotized 
virga  (at  the  tip  of  the  endophallus)  becomes  visible  through  the  wall  ot 
the  phallus.  This  small  virga  (Snodgrass,  1935:622)  will  be  of  considerable 
taxonomic  importance  in  more  extensive  revisions,  and  is  a  useiul  com¬ 
parative  morphological  character,  even  in  this  limited  study  ot  California 
species.  For  more  lucid  observations,  one  may  extract  the  virga  with  a 
hooked  needle  thrust  into  the  apical  orifice  of  the  aedeagus  or  extrude  it 
with  the  pressure  of  an  injection  of  alcohol  into  the  basal  orifice  of  the 
aedeagus  from  a  micro  eyedropper.  The  shape  of  the  phallus,  the  virga, 
and  the  parameres  are  illustrated  for  each  California  species  in  the  accom¬ 
panying  plates.  For  the  identification  of  most  specimens,  the  complicated 
clearing  process  described  above  is  not  absolutely  essential,  because 
identification  can  be  accomplished  by  just  comparing  the  aedeagal  apices 
that  are  visible  after  the  terminalia  have  been  drawn  a  short  distance  out 
of  the  abdominal  tip.  The  above  dissecting  methods  have  been  modified 
from  those  of  Lindroth  (1963)  and  Bell  (1960). 


Acknowledgements 

Special  thanks  are  due  the  following  people,  without  whose  help  the 
preparation  of  this  paper  would  have  been  impossible:  Dr  J.  Gordon 
Edwards,  San  Jose  State  College,  under  whose  direction  this  research 
was  carried  out;  Mr.  Guy  Colas,  Curator  of  Insects,  Museum  Nationa 
d’Histoire  Naturelle,  Paris,  France,  for  the  loan  of  the  type  specimens 
from  Chaudoir’s  Collection;  Dr.  P.  J.  Darlington,  Jr.,  Museum  ot  Com¬ 
parative  Zoology  (Harvard),  Cambridge,  Massachusetts,  for  comparing 
the  author’s  specimens  with  LeConte’s  “types”;  Dr.  William  E.  Ferguson, 
San  Jose  State  College,  for  his  helpful  suggestions;  Mr.  Hugh  B.  Leech, 
California  Academy  of  Sciences,  San  Francisco,  California,  for  allowing 
the  author  to  study  thousands  of  specimens  from  his  institution  and  for 
repeatedly  aiding  in  the  search  for  references  and  citations;  Dr.  Carl  H. 
Lindroth,  University  of  Lund,  Sweden,  for  his  encouragement  and  interest; 
Mr.  A.  T.  McClay,  Curator  of  Insects,  University  of  California  at  Davis, 
Davis,  California,  for  the  loan  of  hundreds  of  valuable  specimens;  Mr. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


3 


Martin  Meinander,  Curator  of  Insects,  University  of  Helsinki,  Finland, 
for  the  loan  of  type  specimens  from  the  Mannerheim  Collection;  A.  G. 
Ponomarenko,  Research  Fellow,  Academy  of  Sciences  of  USSR,  Moscow, 
U.S.S.R.,  for  comparing  the  author’s  specimens  with  Motschulsky’s 
“cotypes”  in  the  University  of  Moscow  Museum;  Mr.  Charles  F.  Harbison 
San  Diego  Society  of  Natural  History,  San  Diego,  California,  for  the  loan 
ol  several  hundred  valuable  specimens;  Mr.  Charles  L.  Hogue,  Curator  of 
Entomology,  Los  Angeles  County  Museum,  Los  Angeles,  California,  for 
the  loan  of  several  hundred  valuable  specimens;  Dr.  William  F.  Barr, 
University  of  Idaho,  Moscow,  Idaho,  for  the  loan  of  several  California 
specimens.  I  am  also  indebted  to  Vladimir  V.  Baicher,  J.  Gordon  Edwards, 
and  Ronald  E.  Stecker,  all  of  San  Jose  State  College,  for  the  loan  of  their 
personal  collections  of  Brachinus. 

The  following  abbreviations  indicate  the  museums  in  which  the  specimens 
cited  are  located:  CAS,  California  Academy  of  Sciences;  LACM,  Los 
Angeles  County  Museum;  SDNHM,  San  Diego  Natural  History  Museum; 
SJSC,  San  Jose  State  College  Museum;  UCD,  University  of  California  at 
Davis;  ATM,  A.  T.  McClay;  UIM,  University  of  Idaho  Museum;  JGE,  J. 
G.  Edwards;  VVB,  V.  V.  Baicher;  RES,  R.  E.  Stecker;  and  TLE,  the 
author’s  personal  collection. 


Brachinus  Weber 


Brachinus  Weber,  1801:22. 

( Carabus  Linne,  Fabricius;  Brachynus  auct.) 

TYPE  OF  GENUS:  Carabus  crepitans  Linne,  here  designated.  This  was 
the  second  species  listed  by  Weber,  because  bimaculatus  (which  Weber 
listed  first)  is  now  included  in  Pheropsophus  Solier  1833. 

Description:  Small  to  medium  sized  beetles  with  blue  or  brown  elytra  and  ferru- 
gineus  head  and  thorax.  The  following  characters  are  representative  of  this  genus: 
second  antennal  segment  short  and  all  segments  with  at  least  some  pubescence-  eyes 
prominent  and  with  a  “bead”-  at  dorsal  edge;  labrum  short  and  broad;  mandibles 
each  with  a  single  tooth;  galae  palpiform  and  two-segmented,  with  apical  segment 
ohcomcal;  maxillary  palpi  four-segmented,  with  second  and  third  segments  obconical- 
latual  palpi  three-segmented,  with  first  and  second  segments  obconical;  anterior 
tibiae  with  an  “antennal  comb”  (formed  of  a  fringe  of  stiff  setae)  in  middle  of 
posterior  edge,  and  with  an  apical  tibial  spine;  elytra  costate  to  a  variable  degree,  and 
truncate  to  dehiscent  at  apex;  epipleura  elevated  above  margin  of  elytra  from 
humen  to  outer  apical  comer;  venter  of  thorax  and  abdomen  mostly  pubescent- 
middle  coxal  cavities  disjunct;  abdomen  with  seven  visible  sterna;  parameres  of  male 
genitalia  glabrous,  reduced,  the  right  one  being  very  much  smaller  than  the  left. 

These  beetles,  when  alarmed,  forcibly  eject  a  liquid  (composed  in  part 
of  nitrogen  and  P-benzoquinone)  from  the  pygidial  glands  that  are  located 
in  the  caudal  half  of  the  abdomen  under  the  reproductive  organs.  This 
liquid  volatizes  instantly  upon  contact  with  the  air,  generating  a  small  puff 
of  “smoke”  accompanied  by  an  audible  popping  or  crackling  sound.  If  this 
liquid  touches  human  skin,  the  skin  will  burn  for  an  instant  and  then  turn 
dark  brown  which  lasts  for  several  days,  eventually  fading  to  normal  color. 


-  "Bead”  in  the  sense  used  here  refers  to  a  raised  ridge  similar  to  a  welding  bead. 


4 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


Enemies  of  Brachinus  (birds,  insects,  skunks,  etc.)  no  doubt  will  be  affected 
in  much  the  same  manner  and  will  not  “forget”  the  lesson.  The  popping 
will  act  to  scare  any  enemy  capable  of  hearing,  and  the  puff  of  “smoke” 
would  serve  to  startle  an  enemy.  This  ability  to  crepitate  has  resulted  in 
both  the  common  name  of  these  beetles  (“bombardier  beetles”)  and  in 
many  of  the  species  names  such  as  Brachinus  explodens  Duft.,  B.  crepitans 
(Linne),  B.  fumans  (Fab.),  and  B.  librator  Dejean. 

Brachinus  beetles  are  usually  not  far  from  water,  in  streamside,  lakeside, 
or  marshy  habitats.  Most  members  of  this  genus  are  capable  of  flying  and 
do  so  when  the  food  supply  is  scarce  or  the  environmental  conditions  become 

unsuitable. 

Key  to  Brachinus  of  California3 

1.  Mentum  flat  or  slightly  convex,  with  scattered  setae;  elytra  with  at  least  the 

8th  interval  densely  pubescent -  2 

Mentum  concave,  surrounded  by  a  ring  of  setae;  elytra  without  dense  pubescence 

in  any  interval _ COSTIPENNIS  Motschulsky 

2.  Elytra  with  dense  pubescence  restricted  to  8th  interval,  but  scattered  hairs  may 

occur  on  the  apical  third  of  elytra - GEBHARDIS  new  species 

Elytral  pubescence  not  restricted  to  8th  interval -  3 

3.  Elytra  with  pubescence  restricted  to  6th,  7th,  and  8th  intervals  at  middle  (but 

also  covering  most  of  the  apical  third  of  the  elytra) -  4 

Elytra  with  entire  dorsal  surface  pubescent -  6 

4.  Elytra  blue,  with  blue  epipleurae -  " 

Elytra  brown,  with  testaceous  epipleurae - LATERALIS  Dejean 

5.  Antennal  segments  3-5  usually  black,  at  least  in  part  (rarely  ferrugineus),  outer 

segments  dusky;  mesepisterna  and  sides  of  abdomen  black;  last  3  abdominal  terga 

darkened,  usually  black - FIDELIS  LeConte 

Antennae  pale  ferrugineus;  abdomen,  mesepisterna  and  last  3  terga  pale  ferrugineus 

(browner  in  some  populations) - PALLIDUS  new  species 

6.  Pronotum  smooth  or  shallowly  rugose -  ~  _  ^ 

Pronotum  with  deep  punctations  forming  a  strongly  rugose  surface  FAVICOLLIS  new  species 

7.  Pronotum  strongly  cordiform,  with  sides  more  or  less  explanate  before  the  middle; 

abdomen  and  mesepisterna  black;  antennal  segments  3-11  entirely  black 

_  TSCHERNIKHI  Mannerheim 

Pronotum  narrow,  distinctly  longer  than  wide  and  with  sides  not  explanate;  venter 

pale;  antennal  segments  3-11  dusky -  8 

8.  Elytra  feebly  costate,  feebly  pubescent;  pronotal  disc  glabrous,  with  only  a  few 

scattered  hairs  around  margins;  head  with  frontal  furrows  deep  and  rugose 

_  IMPERIALENSIS  new  species 

Elytra  not  costate,  densely  pubescent;  pronotal  disc  with  dense  pubescence;  head 

with  shallow  frontal  furrows - VELUTINUS  new  species 

Brachinus  costipennis  Motschulsky 
Brachinus  costipennis  Motschulsky,  1 859 :  139. 

Brachinus  carinulatus  Motschulsky,  1859;  139.  (NEW  SYNONYMY) 
Brachinus  glabripennis  LeConte,  1858:  28.  (NOMEN  NUDUM) 

In  1862  (p.  523)  LeConte  listed  Brachinus  lecontei  Motschulsky  as  a 
synonym  of  B.  costipennis,  however  Ponamarenko  has  compared  the  “type” 

3  This  key  treats  the  species  known  to  occur  naturally  in  California,  but  some  of 
these  have  ranges  that  extend  far  beyond  the  boundaries  of  this  state. 

i  In  this  key  “elytral  interval”  refers  to  the  depressions  between  the  costae. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


5 


specimens  of  these  species,  and  they  are  definitely  different.  For  further 
details,  see  Brachinus  ft  delis  LeConte. 

TYPE  LOCALITY:  B.  costipennis:  “California”;  B.  carinulatus: 
“California.” 

TYPE  SPECIMENS:  Two  cotypes  of  B.  costipennis  and  two  cotypes  of 
B.  carinulatus  are  in  the  Motschulsky  collection  at  the  University  of 
Moscow.  One  specimen  of  B.  costipennis  is  in  the  LeConte  collection, 
designated  as  type  number  8329,  at  the  Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology, 
Cambridge,  Massachusetts.  Dr.  Darlington  states  that  this  specimen  is  very 
likely  a  cotype  from  Motschulsky,  with  whom  LeConte  is  known  to  have 
corresponded. 

DISTRIBUTION:  This  species  is  found  in  most  of  the  southwestern 
United  States  and  as  far  north  as  Tehama  County  in  California.  It  is  one 
of  three  species  occurring  on  Santa  Cruz  Island,  20  miles  off  the  coast  of 
Santa  Barbara  County  in  southern  California  (fig.  10). 

DESCRIPTION:  Size.  Length  5  to  8  mm.;  width  4  to  4.2  mm.  Coloration.  Elytra 
of  both  sexes  bluish  with  blue  epipleura;  head  and  pronotum  ferrugineus;  mesal 
edges  of  mandibles  piceous;  antennal  segments  1-3,  legs,  palpi,  and  venter  ferrugino- 
testaceous;  antennal  segments  4-11  dusky  brown;  mesepisterna  and  sides  of  abdominal 
sterna  ferrugineus,  rarely  brown.  Head.  Labrum  entire;  dorsal  surface  of  mentum 
concave,  with  a  ring  of  setae  surrounding  concavity;  bead  around  eyes  entire  except 
for  a  short  area  behind  each  antenna;  furrows  on  frons  very  shallow  and  smooth; 
only  a  few  setae  at  most  behind  eyes  and  on  top  of  head;  microsculpture  consists  of 
small  isodiametric  meshes.  Pronotum.  Widest  at  anterior  third;  anterior  angles  prom¬ 
inent  and  rounded;  posterior  angles  prominent,  acute  and  directed  posteriorly,  with 
lateral  basal  impressions  shallow;  lateral  margins  slightly  reflexed  and  narrowly 
beaded  with  dark  reddish  brown;  disc  flat,  sometimes  slightly  convex,  barely  rugose 
down  midline  and  at  most  a  few  setiferous  discal  punctures;  anterior  transverse 
impressions  deep;  microsculpture  consists  of  isodiametric  meshes.  Elytra.  Male  elytra 
truncate,  widest  just  behind  middle;  moderately  costate;  microsculpture  consists  of 
small  isodiametric  meshes;  glabrous  except  for  regularly  spaced  hairs  in  8th  interval. 
Female  elytra  similar  except  proportionally  wider  than  those  of  male.  Aedeagus 
(fig.  1).  Phallus  strongly  arched;  ending  in  an  apical  knob;  microsculpture  lacking. 
Endophallus  bears  a  poorly  pigmented  virga,  consisting  of  a  “V”  shaped  tip,  with  a 
median  ventral  fin.  A  pigmented  intravirgal  piece  occurs  at  the  base  of  this  fin. 

CALIFORNIA  LOCALITY  RECORDS:  397  specimens  were  examined. 
Alameda  County:  (Oakland  Hills)  CAS;  Fresno  County:  (Sanger)  CAS, 
(LeFerre  Creek)  CAS,  (Camp  Greeley)  CAS;  Humbolt  County:  (Garberville) 
CAS;  Imperial  County:  (Carrizo)  SDNHM,  (Castiac)  UIM;  Los  Angeles 
County:  (San  Francisquito  Canyon)  LACM,  (Pasadena)  LACM,  (Camp 
Bonita,  San  Gabriel  Mts.)  LACM,  (Big  Dalton  Dam)  ATM,  (Big  Tujunga) 
LACM,  (Los  Angeles  River)  LACM,  (Rio  Hondo)  LACM,  (Frenchman 
Flats)  LACM,  (Lake  Arrowhead)  CAS,  (Tujunga  Pass)  ATM;  Madera 
County:  (Coursegold)  UIM  CAS;  Mendocino  County:  (Ukiah)  VVB; 
Monterey  County:  (Stone  Canyon)  CAS;  Orange  County:  (Costa  Mesa) 
ATM;  Placer  County:  (Placer  County)  CAS;  Riverside  County:  (Simond’s) 
LACM,  (Palm  Canyon)  LACM,  (Riverside)  CAS,  (Elsinore  Lake) 
CAS,  (Hemet)  VVB,  (Gilman  Hot  Springs)  ATM;  San  Bernadino 
County:  (Cajon  Wash)  LACM,  (Colton)  CAS,  (Cajon  Pass)  ATM;  San 
Diego  County:  (Mission  Dam)  SDNHM,  (Mission  Valley)  SDNHM, 
(Pine  Valley)  SDNHM,  (Dehesa)  SDNHM,  (El  Monte  Oaks)  SDNHM, 
(San  Diego)  SDNHM,  (Valley  Center)  SDNHM,  (Warner’s  Ranch) 


6 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


SDNHM,  (Rincoln)  SDNHM,  (Banner)  SDNHM,  (Oceanside)  CAS, 
(Poway)  CAS,  (Descanso)  CAS;  San  Luis  Obispo  County:  (Arroyo 
Grande)  CAS;  Santa  Clam  County:  (Adobe  Creek)  CAS;  Santa  Cruz 
Island:  (Santa  Cruz  Island)  CAS;  Sonoma  County:  (Duncan  Mills)  CAS; 
Tehama  County:  (hills  west  of  Tehama  County)  CAS;  Tulare  County: 
(Sequoia  Park)  VVB;  Ventura  County:  (Santa  Paula)  CAS;  Yolo  County: 
(Davis)  ATM. 

DERIVATION  OF  THE  NAME:  Latin,  costa  =  rib;  pennis  —  wing; 
referring  to  the  costate  elytra. 

DISCUSSION:  This  species  is  unique  among  the  Brachinus  in  our  fauna 
because  of  the  concave  mentum  surrounded  by  setae.  Also,  this  is  the  only 
California  species  whose  members  possess  glabrous  elytra.  The  male  is 
further  distinguishable  by  having  the  apical  knob  of  the  adeagus  so  well 
developed.  The  species  is  widely  distributed  within  the  state,  as  indicated 
by  the  collection  records. 

Brachinus  gehhardis  Erwin,  NEW  SPECIES 

TYPE  LOCALITY:  Uvas  Creek,  5  miles  west  of  Morgan  Hill,  Santa 
Clara  County,  California. 

TYPE  SPECIMENS:  The  holotype  male  and  the  allotype  female  have 
been  deposited  in  the  entomological  museum  at  the  California  Academy 
of  Sciences  in  San  Francisco.  Both  were  collected  by  the  author  at  the 
type  locality,  on  9  February  1964.  Forty-six  paratypes  (of  both  sexes) 
were  collected  by  the  author  along  Coyote  Creek,  7  miles  east  of  Gilroy, 
Santa  Clara  County,  California  (below  Gilroy  Hot  Springs).  Ten  of  these 
paratypes  are  deposited  in  each  of  the  following:  CAS,  MCZ,  AMNH, 
and  the  author’s  personal  collection  Two  paratypes  are  in  each  of  the 
following:  SJSC,  UCD,  and  the  University  of  Moscow.  The  remaining 
paratypes  have  been  returned  to  their  owners. 

DISTRIBUTION:  This  species  is  confined  to  the  extreme  west  coast 
of  California  except  at  the  type  locality  and  in  Riverside  County.  It  is  one 
of  the  three  species  which  occur  on  Santa  Cruz  Island,  20  miles  off  the 
coast  of  Santa  Barbara  County  (fig.  11). 

DESCRIPTION:  Size.  Length  6  to  8:5  mm.;  width  4.5  to  4.6  mm.  Coloration. 
Elytra  of  both  sexes  blue  with  blue  epipleura;  head  and  pronotum  ferrugineus; 
mandibles  reddish  brown  with  piceous  mesal  edges;  antennal  segments  1-4,  legs  and 
palpi  pale  ferrugineus;  antennal  segments  5-11  slightly  darker  than  segment  4;  mes- 
episterna  black;  sides  of  abdominal  sterna  usually  ferrugineus  but  rarely  black.  Head. 
Labrum  slightly  emarginate;  dorsal  surface  of  mentum  convex,  with  a  seta  only  at 
each  anterior  corner;  bead  around  eyes  entire;  frons  with  shallow,  finely  rugose 
frontal  furrows;  numerous  setae  arise  behind  eyes  and  on  top  of  head;  microsculpture 
consists  of  small  isodiametric  meshes.  Pronotum.  Widest  before  middle  with  sides 
deeply  sinuate;  anterior  angles  not  prominent;  posterior  angles  acute,  with  lateral 
basal  impressions  shallow;  lateral  margins  broadly  reflexed;  marginal  bead  dark 
ferrugineus;  disc  flat,  somewhat  rugose  down  midline  and  with  several  setiferous 
punctures  in  basal  half  and  a  few  at  anterior  corners;  anterior  transverse  impression 
reduced  to  a  triangular  depression;  microsculpture  consists  of  small  isodiametric 
meshes.  Elytra.  Male  elytra  truncate,  widest  at  apical  third,  narrowing  slightly  to 
squared  humeri  which  are  not  prominent;  deeply  costate;  microsculpture  consists 
of  fine  isodiametric  meshes;  pubescent  band  confined  to  8th  interval,  but  a  few 
scattered  hairs  occur  at  apex  and  in  scutellar  region.  Female  elytra  similar  but  wider 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


7 


at  apical  third  than  those  of  male.  Aedecigus  (fig.  2).  Phallus  fairly  straight;  ending 
in  a  rounded  point;  microsculpture  lacking.  Endophallus  bears  a  poorly  pigmented 
virga  which  is  fused  apically,  but  has  two  basal  lobes. 

CALIFORNIA  LOCALITY  RECORDS:  70  paratypes  were  examined. 
Alameda  County:  (Arroyo  Mocho)  TLE;  Amador  County:  (Horse  Creek) 
TLE;  Los  Angeles  County:  (Pasadena)  CAS,  (Soledad  Canyon)  LACM, 
(San  Francisquito  Canyon)  LACM,  (Tanbark  Flat)  ATM;  Monterey 
County:  (Bryson)  CAS;  Orange  County:  (Lower  San  Juan  Campground) 
LACM;  Riverside  County:  (San  Jacinto  Mts.)  CAS;  San  Diego  County: 
(Valley  Center)  SDNHM;  San  Luis  Obispo  County:  (Atascadero)  CAS, 
(San  Luis  Obispo)  CAS;  Santa  Barbara  County:  (Cuyama  River)  CAS, 
(West  Santa  Ynez  River)  ATM,  (Oso  Canyon)  ATM;  Santa  Cruz  Island: 
(Santa  Cruz  Island)  CAS;  Santa  Clara  County:  (Uvas  Creek)  TLE, 
(Pacheco  Pass)  UIM,  (Gilroy  Hot  Springs)  TLE;  Stanislaus  County:  (Del 
Puerto  Creek)  TLE;  Ventura  County:  (Foster  Park)  ATM. 

DERIVATION  OF  THE  NAME:  Greek,  geb  —  born;  Old  French, 
hardi  =  shovel-shaped;  referring  to  the  “spade”  shaped  dorsal  outline  of 
these  beetles. 

DISCUSSION:  This  species  is  poorly  represented  in  collections  and 
seems  to  be  more  rare  than  the  other  northern  species.  The  pubescent 
band  of  the  elytra  being  confined  to  the  8th  interval  serves  as  an  excellent 
field  identification  character.  The  lack  of  a  ridge  at  the  dorsal  apex  on 
the  penis  easily  separates  males  from  those  of  B.  fidelis,  which  are  other¬ 
wise  quite  similar  to  B.  gebhardis. 

Brachinus  lateralis  Dejean 
Brachinus  lateralis  Dejean,  1831 :  424. 

Brachynus  leucoloma  Chaudoir,  1868:  301.  (NEW  SYNONYMY) 

TYPE  LOCALITY:  B.  lateralis:  “Moritz,  Angustura,  Guayama  baja, 
Misiones  Del  Coronis”  is  handwritten  on  the  label  of  Mannerheim’s  speci¬ 
men,  which  was  given  to  him  by  Dejean;  B.  leucoloma:  “de  Rio  Gila,  en 
California”  is  cited  in  Chaudoir’s  description  (refers  to  the  Gila  River  in 
the  extreme  southeast  corner  of  California) . 

TYPE  SPECIMENS:  One  syntype  of  B.  lateralis  is  in  the  Mannerheim 
collection  at  the  University  of  Helsinki.  One  cotype  of  B.  leucoloma  is  in 
the  Museum  National  d’Histoire  Naturelle,  Paris. 

DISTRIBUTION:  This  species  is  widely  distributed  across  the  southern 
United  States  from  Florida  to  California  and  into  Mexico.  Blatchley  (1910) 
records  one  specimen  from  Indiana,  but  the  record  is  doubtful  because  he 
indicates  the  elytra  are  blue-black  instead  of  brown  (fig.  12). 

DESCRIPTION:  Size.  Length  7  to  9  mm.;  width  4.3  to  4.5  mm.  Coloration.  Elytra 
of  both  sexes  brownish  with  pale  testaceous  epipleura;  head  and  pronotum  dark 
ferrugineus;  mandibles  piceous  at  apex;  antennal  segments  1-4,  legs,  palpi,  and  frons 
ferrugino-testaceous;  antennal  segments  5-11  dark  ferrugineus;  mesepisterna  and 
sides  of  abdominal  sterna  dark  brown  (similar  in  color  to  the  elytra).  Head.  Labrum 
slightly  notched  at  apex;  dorsal  surface  of  mentum  convex  with  a  seta  at  each 
anterior  corner;  bead  occurs  only  around  top  half  of  eyes;  frons  with  rugose  longi¬ 
tudinal  furrows  which  widen  at  base  of  clypeus;  only  a  few  setae  arise  behind  eyes 
and  on  top  of  head;  microsculpture  consists  of  small  isodiametric  meshes.  Pronotum. 


8 


THE  COLEOPTEPJSTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


Slightly  wider  just  before  middle  and  with  sides  deeply  sinuate;  anterior  angles  not 
very  prominent  (barely  exceeding  width  of  anterior  margin);  posterior  angles 
prominent,  acute  with  lateral  basal  impressions  almost  absent;  lateral  margins  slightly 
reflexed,  narrowly  beaded  with  dark  reddish  brown  bead;  disc  flat,  slightly  rugose 
down  midline  and  with  a  few  setiferous  punctures  at  base  and  at  midapex;  micro¬ 
sculpture  consists  of  small  isodiametric  meshes.  Elytra.  Male  elytra  truncate,  widest 
at  apical  third,  narrowing  anteriorly  to  prominent  humeri;  very  slightly  costate; 
microsculpture  consists  of  very  fine  isodiametric  meshes;  pubescent  bands  occur  near 
humeri  only  in  7th  and  8th  intervals,  but  broadened  gradually  and  covering  entire 
elytra  beyond  apical  sixth.  Female  elytra  similar,  but  proportionately  slightly  wider 
than  those  of  male  in  apical  half.  Aedeagus  (fig.  3).  Phallus  heavily  sclerotized 
ending  in  a  blunt  tip;  a  median  dorsal  ridge  and  two  lateral  ridges  occur  near  apex 
and  the  apical  half  is  rugose  between  ridges;  microsculpture  lacking.  Endophallus 
bears  a  poorly  pigmented  virga  consisting  of  two  lateral  plates. 

CALIFORNIA  LOCALITY  RECORDS;  94  specimens  were  examined. 
Imperial  County:  (Yuma)  CAS,  (Salton  Sea)  VVB,  (Mecca)  Coachella 
Valley  Mosquito  Abatement  District  Collection,  (Calpatria)  CAS,  (El 
Centro)  CAS;  Los  Angeles  County:  (Pasadena)  CAS,  (Long  Beach) 
CAS,  (Lake  Hodges)  SDNHM,  (Cypress)  LACM,  (Los  Angeles)  CAS; 
Orange  County:  (Laguna  Canyon)  ATM,  (Anaheim)  SDNHM;  Riverside 
County:  (Elsinore)  CAS,  (Elsinore  Lake)  CAS  UIM,  (Blythe)  UIM 
LACM,  (Corona)  ATM;  San  Bernadino  County:  (Needles)  CAS,  (On¬ 
tario)  CAS,  (Saratoga  Springs,  Death  Valley)  ATM;  San  Diego  County: 
(Oceanside)  CAS,  (San  Diego)  SDNHM,  (San  Juan  Capistrano)  UIM, 
(Sweetwater  Valley)  SDNHM. 

DERIVATION  OF  THE  NAME:  French,  lateralis  —  side;  referring 
to  the  pale  epipleura. 

DISCUSSION:  This  species  is  very  easy  to  recognize  because  it  is  the 
only  North  American  species  with  brown  elytra.  The  aedeagus  is  also  very 
distinctive. 

Brachinus  pallidus  Erwin,  NEW  SPECIES 

TYPE  LOCALITY :  Mad  River,  5  miles  east  of  Mad  River  Post  Office, 
Trinity  County,  California. 

TYPE  SPECIMENS:  The  holotype  male  and  allotype  female  have  been 
deposited  in  the  entomological  museum  at  the  California  Academy  of 
Sciences  in  San  Francisco.  Both  were  collected  by  the  author  at  the  type 
locality,  on  August  16,  1964.  Forty-eight  paratypes  (of  both  sexes)  were 
collected  by  the  author  at  the  type  locality  and  from  Coyote  Creek,  7  miles 
east  of  Gilroy,  Santa  Clara  County,  California  (below  Gilroy  Hot  Springs). 
Ten  of  these  paratypes  are  deposited  in  each  of  the  following:  CAS,  MCZ, 
AMNH,  and  the  author’s  collection.  Two  paratypes  are  in  each  of  the 
following:  SJSC,  UCD,  UIM,  and  the  University  of  Moscow.  The  remain¬ 
ing  paratypes  have  been  returned  to  their  owners. 

DISTRIBUTION:  This  species  is  mostly  restricted  to  northern  Cali¬ 
fornia,  with  only  two  populations  known  to  occur  south  of  Monterey  Bay 
(fig.  13). 

DESCRIPTION:  Size.  Length  7  to  9  mm.;  width  3  to  3:5  mm.  Coloration.  Elytra 
of  both  sexes  dark  blue  with  blue  epipleura;  head  and  pronotum  ferrugineus;  mandi¬ 
bles  reddish  brown  with  piceous  mesal  edges  and  tip;  antennal  segments  1-2,  legs, 
and  palpi  ferrugino-testaceous;  antennal  segments  3-11  ferrugineus;  mesepisterna 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


9 


and  sides  of  abommal  sterna  ferrugineus  (occasionally  caudal  half  of  mesepisterna 
is  brown,  in  which  case  sides  of  abdominal  sterna  will  also  be  brown).  Head.  Labrum 
entire;  dorsal  surface  of  mentum  slightly  convex,  with  a  setae  at  each  anterior 
corner;  bead  around  eyes  entire,  thickened  at  dorsal  edge;  frons  with  shallow  frontal 
furrows  which  are  finely  rugose;  numerous  setae  arise  behind  eyes  and  on  top  of 
had,  microsculpture  consists  of  very  fine  isodiametric  meshes.  Pronotum.  Wider  just 
before  middle  and  with  sides  deeply  sinuate;  anterior  angles  slightly  prominent- 
posterior  angles  acute  and  directed  posteriorly,  with  lateral  basal  impressions 
shallow;  lateral  margins  slightly  reflexed,  with  a  narrow  bead  of  slightly  darker 
color  than  pronotum;  disc  flat,  quite  rugose  down  midline  and  with  a  few  setiferous 
punctures  on  basal  half  and  at  anterior  corners;  microsculpture  consists  of  fine 
isodiametric  meshes.  Elytra.  Male  elytra  with  sides  almost  parallel,  narrowing  very 
little  to  slightly  prominent  humeri;  deeply  costate;  microsculpture  consists  of  fine 
isodiametric  meshes;  pubescent  bands  occur  near  humeri  only  in  7th  and  8th 
intervals,  but  broaden  to  cover  entire  elytra  beyond  apical  fourth;  a  few  hairs  occur 
in  scute  liar  region.  Female  elytra  similar,  but  proportionately  wider  than  those  of 
m^„in,apica-l  ^a^‘  Aedeagus  (fig.  4).  Phallus  prominently  compressed  resembling 
?  .  .  s22Pe  in  cross  section  and  ending  in  a  feebly  rounded  point;  microsculpture 
lacking  The  endophallus  bears  a  lightly  pigmented  bilobed  virga  which  is  connected 
ventrally  by  a  thin  “bridge.” 

CALIFORNIA  LOCALITY  RECORDS:  392  paratypes  were  exam¬ 
ined.  Alameda  County:  (Arroyo  Mocho)  TLE,  (Livermore)  CAS,  (Sunol) 
CAS,  (Niles  Canyon)  SDNHM;  Amador  County:  (5  miles  west  of  Sutter 
Creek  on  Horse  Creek)  TLE;  Butte  County:  (Oroville)  CAS;  Calaveras 
County:  (Mokelumne  Hill)  CAS;  Contra  Costa  County:  (Marsh  Creek) 
TLE,  Fresno  County:  (Camp  Greely)  CAS;  Glenn  County:  (Elk  Creek) 
CAS;  Humbolt  County:  (Garberville)  CAS  UIM,  (Schively)  ATM,  (Fort 
Seward)  CAS  UIM;  Lake  County:  (Middletown)  CAS  UIM,  (North  Fork 
Cache  Creek,  Hwy.  20)  ATM;  Madera  County:  (Coursegold)  CAS  UIM 
Marin  County:  (Pt.  Reyes)  ATM  CAS;  Mariposa  County:  (Jolon)  CAS,’ 
(3  miles  S.  E.  of  Jolon)  CAS;  Napa  County:  (Rutherford)  TLE,  (Monti- 
cello)  ATM;  Placer  County:  (Auburn)  ATM;  San  Joaquin  County:  (San 
Joaquin  County)  SJSC;  San  Luis  Obispo  County:  (Atascadero)  CAS; 
Santa  Clara  County:  (Gilroy  Hot  Springs)  TLE,  (Uvas  Creek)  TLE’ 
(Isabel  Creek)  TLE,  (Los  Gatos)  CAS,  (Mt.  Hamilton)  CAS,  (San 
Jose)  CAS,  (Arroyo  Bayo)  JGE,  (Santa  Clara)  CAS;  Siskiyou  County: 
(south  of  the  Shasta  River)  CAS;  Shasta  County:  (Anderson)  CAS, 
(Redding)  CAS  VVB;  Sonoma  County:  (Del  Puerto  Creek)  TLE*  Tehama 
County:  (Red  Bluff)  CAS;  Trinity  County:  (Mad  River)  TLE-  Yolo 
County:  (Putah  Canyon)  ATM,  (Davis)  ATM. 

DERIVATION  OF  THE  NAME:  Latin,  pallidus  —  pale;  referring  to 
the  pale  ferrugineus  venter,  limbs,  head,  and  thorax. 

DISCUSSION:  Members  of  this  species  are  easily  recognized  by  the 
compressed  ventral  surface  of  the  aedeagus,  and  by  the  light  color  of  the 
abdomen  and  mesepisterna. 


Brachinus  fidelis  LeConte 
Brachinus  fidelis  LeConte,  1862:  524. 

Brachinus  lecontei  Motschulsky,  1859:  139.  (Primary  homonym  of  B. 
lecontei  LeConte,  1844:49.) 


10 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


In  1859,  Motschulsky  described  B.  lecontei  from  California,  but  it  was 
a  primary  homonym  of  B.  lecontei  LeConte,  1844,  from  the  southern 
United  States.  According  to  LeConte  (1862)  B.  lecontei  LeC.  is  a  synonym 
of  B.  perplexus  Dejean.  Motschulsky’s  name  B.  lecontei  must  also  be  re¬ 
jected,  on  the  grounds  that  it  was,  when  proposed,  a  primary  homonym. 
LeConte,  in  1862,  described  B.  fidelis,  from  California,  as  a  species  dis¬ 
tinct  from  B.  lecontei  Mots.  During  the  course  of  this  research  the  author 
sent  identical  specimens  of  Brachinus  from  Del  Puerto  Creek,  California, 
to  both  A.  G.  Ponomarenko  and  P.  J.  Darlington  with  requests  that 
several  characters  be  critically  compared  with  those  of  the  type  specimens 
at  the  University  of  Moscow  Museum  and  the  Museum  of  Comparative 
Zoology.  As  a  result  of  these  comparisons,  it  was  determined  that  the  Del 
Puerto  Creek  specimens  are  identical  both  with  Motschulsky’s  two  type 
specimens  of  B.  lecontei  (in  Moscow)  and  with  LeContes  eleven  type 
specimens  of  B.  fidelis  (in  the  Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology).  Accord¬ 
ingly,  B.  fidelis  LeC.  is  a  synonym  of  B.  lecontei  Mots.  Because  B.  lecontei 
Motsch.  is  invalid,  the  first  available  valid  name  is  B.  fidelis  LeConte  1862. 

( B .  lecontei  Dejean  [1837:  14]  must  be  considered  a  nomen  nudum.) 

TYPE  LOCALITY:  B.  fidelis:  “Kern”  is  handwritten  on  the  label  of 
LeConte’s  first  specimen.  A  gold  disc  represents  the  state  of  California 
on  all  of  LeConte’s  types  of  this  species.  B.  lecontei:  “California”  is  cited 
in  Motschulsky’s  description,  but  his  cotypes  are  labelled  B.  latipennis 
lecontei  Motsch.,  California. 

TYPE  SPECIMENS:  Two  cotypes  of  B.  lecontei  Mots,  are  in  the 
Motschulsky  collection  at  the  University  of  Moscow.  Eleven  specimens 
are  in  LeConte’s  series  of  B.  fidelis  LeC.  at  the  Museum  of  Comparative 
Zoology.  The  first  specimen  in  this  latter  series  is  designated  as  type  number 
5852.  The  last  specimen  in  the  series  is  labelled  “Or.” 

DISTRIBUTION:  This  species,  as  far  as  is  known,  is  confined  to  Cali¬ 
fornia,  Arizona,  and  Mexico,  occurring  sympatrically  with  B.  costipennis. 
It  is  one  of  the  three  species  occurring  on  Santa  Cruz  Island,  20  miles  off 
the  coast  of  Santa  Barbara  County  in  southern  California  (fig.  14). 

DESCRIPTION:  Size.  Length  7  to  9  mm.;  width  4.5  to  4.6  mm.  Coloration.  Elytra 
of  both  sexes  dark  blue  with  blue  epipleura;  head  and  pronotum  ferrugineus, 
mandibles  dark  red-brown  to  piceous  at  tips  and  along  mesal  edges;  antennal  segments 
3-5  black  or  banded  black;  segments  6-11  dusky  to  brown;  mesepisterna  and  sides 
of  abdominal  sterna  black  (venter  may  vary  from  dark  ferrugineus  to  dark  brown). 
Head.  Labrum  entire;  dorsal  surface  of  the  mentum  convex  at  middle  with  a  setae 
at  each  anterior  corner;  bead  around  eyes  entire  joining  with  ridge^  over  antennal 
base;  furrows  on  frons  shallow,  finely  rugose  usually  in  form  of  a  V  ;  numerous 
setae  arise  behind  eyes  and  a  few  from  top  of  head;  microscultpure  consists  of  tine 
isodiametric  meshes.  Pronotum.  Widest  just  behind  anterior  angles  well  in  front  ot 
middle;  anterior  angles  prominent  and  rounded;  posterior  angles  prominent  and 
acute;  with  lateral  margins  narrowly  reflexed  and  narrowly  beaded  with  a  dark 
reddish-brown  color;  disc  convex  to  flat,  slightly  rugose  at  center  and  at  most  a 
few  setiferous  punctures  occurring  in  apical  and  basal  transverse  impressions,  anterior 
transverse  impression  reduced  to  almost  a  triangular  fovea;  microsculpture  consists 
of  small  isodiametric  meshes.  Elytra.  Male  elytra  truncate,  widest  at  apical  third 
narrowing  toward  rounded  humeri  which  are  not  prominent;  deeply  costate,  micro- 
sculpture^  consists  of  fine  isodiametric  meshes;  pubescent  band  confined  anteriorly 
to  7th  and  8th  intervals,  but  broadened  gradually  and  covering  entire  elytra  beyond 
apical  third.  Female  elytra  similar,  but  proportionately  wider  than  those  of  male 
in  apical  half.  Aedeagus  (fig.  5).  Phallus  cylindrical,  ending  in  a  rounded  point;  a 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


1 1 


median  ridge  occurs  on  dorsal  surface  at  apex;  microsculpture  lacking.  Endophallus 
nears  a  poorly  pigmented  virga  consisting  of  two  lateral  plates. 

.  ^ALIFORNIA  LOCALITY  RECORDS:  894  specimens  were  exam¬ 
ined.  Alameda  County:  (Niles  Canyon)  ATM,  (San  Leandro)  UIM,  (Oak¬ 
land  Hills)  CAS,  (Livermore)  CAS;  Amador  County:  (5  miles  west  ol 
Sutter  Creek)  TLE;  Colusa  County:  (Hwy.  20  and  16)  ATM,  (Rumsey 
Canyon)  ATM;  El  Dorado  County:  (“El  Dorado  County”)  CAS;  Fresno 
County:  (La  Ferre  Creek)  CAS;  Imperial  County:  (Calpatria)  CAS;  Inyo 
County:  (Little  Lake)  CAS,  (Owens  Lake)  CAS,  (Westgard  Pass  Plateau) 
CAS,  (Olancha)  CAS,  (Deep  Springs  Lake)  CAS,  (Big  Pine)  CAS,  (Inde¬ 
pendence)  CAS,  (Freeman)  CAS,  (Lone  Pine)  CAS,  (Diaz  Lake)  CAS- 
Glenn  County:  (Elk  Creek)  CAS;  Los  Angeles  County:  (Alhambra)  CAs’ 
(Frenchman  Flat)  CAS,  (Arroyo  Seco  Canyon)  VVB,  (San  Dimas) 
CAS,  (Pasadena)  CAS,  (Los  Angeles)  CAS,  (Big  Dalton  Dam)  ATM 
Madera  County:  (O’Neals)  ATM,  (Coarsegold)  CAS;  Mariposa  County: 
(Mariposa)  CAS;  Merced  County:  (Merced)  CAS;  Monterey  County • 
(Stone  Canyon)  CAS,  (3  miles  S.  E.  of  Jolon)  CAS,  (Jolon)  CAS;  Napa 
County:  (Monticello)  ATM;  Orange  County:  (Laguna  Beach)  CAS 
(Black  Star  Canyon)  ATM;  Placer  County:  (“Placer  County”)  CAS 
Riverside  County:  (Colton  CAS,  (Hemet)  VVB,  (Riverside)  CAS,  (Palm 
Canyon)  CAS,  (San  Jacinto  Mts.)  CAS,  (Palm  Springs)  CAS;  San  Benito 
County.  (Panoche  Valley)  CAS;  San  Luis  Obispo  County:  (Cambria) 
CAS,  (San  Luis  Obispo)  CAS,  (Santa  Margarita)  CAS,  (Atascadero) 
CAS;  San  Diego  County:  (Mt.  Palomar)  CAS,  (Carrizo)  UIM,  (Guatay) 
UIM,  (San  Juan  Capistrano)  UIM,  (Poway)  CAS,  (3  miles  south  of 
Dehesa)  TLE,  (Jacumba)  CAS,  (Sweetwater  River)  RES,  (Chicken 
Creek)  CAS,  (Knaus)  CAS,  (9  miles  east  of  Pine  Valley)  ATM,  (Mission 
Valley)  ATM^,  San  Joaquin  County:  (Corral  Hollow)  TLE;  San  Bernadino 
County:  (Cajon  Pass)  ATM;  Santa  Barbara  County:  (Gaviota)  CAS, 
(Cuyama  River)  CAS,  (Santa  Ynez  River,  San  Lucas)  CAS,  (Canada  del 
Venadeto)  ATM,  (Bluff  Camp,  San  Rafael  Mts.)  ATM;  Santa  Cruz  Island • 
(Santa  Cruz  Island)  CAS;  Santa  Cruz  County:  (Santa  Cruz)  CAS;  Santa 
Clara  County:  (Gilroy  Hot  Springs)  TLE,  (Pacheco  Pass)  UIM,  (Uvas 
Creek)  TLE,  (Alum  Rock  Park)  CAS,  (Arroyo  Bayo)  JGE;  Stanislaus 
County:  (Del  Puerto  Creek)  TLE,  (Del  Puerto  Canyon)  UIM;  Tehama 
County.  (  hills  west  of  Tehama  County”)  CAS;  Tulare  County:  (Kaweah) 
CAS;  Ventura  County:  (Santa  Paula)  CAS  ATM,  (Wheeler  Hot  Springs) 
CAS,  (Ventura)  CAS,  (Fillmore)  CAS,  (Foster  Park)  ATM;  Yolo 
County:  (Putah  Canyon)  ATM,  (Davis)  ATM,  (Putah  Creek)  TLE. 

DISCUSSION:  This  is  the  most  common  species  of  Brachinus  in  Cali- 
torma.  It  is  easily  recognized  by  the  darkened  3rd  and  4th  antennal  seg¬ 
ments,  together  with  the  dark  mesepisterna  and  abdominal  sides 


Brachinus  favicollis  Erwin,  NEW  SPECIES 

TYPE  LOCALITY:  Jamul,  San  Diego  County,  California. 

TYPE  SPECIMENS:  The  holotype  male  and  allotype  female  have 
been  deposited  in  the  entomological  museum  at  the  California  Academy 
of  Sciences  in  San  Francisco.  Both  were  collected  by  F.  E.  Blaisdell  at 


12 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


I.  B.COSTIPENNIS 


2.B.  GEBHARDIS 


3  B.  LATERALIS 


7.  B.  TSCHERNIKHI 


8.  B.IMPERIALENSIS 


9.  B  VELUTINUS 


Figures  1-9,  Brachinus  spp.  Aedeagus  from  dorsal  and  lateral  view. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


13 


the  type  locality,  on  March  20,  1899.  Seventy-six  paratypes  collected  on 
various  dates  and  at  various  localities  are  indicated  in  the  CALIFORNIA 
LOCALITY  RECORDS  and  they  have  been  returned  to  the  museums 
also  indicated  there. 

DISTRIBUTION:  This  species  is  restricted  to  southern  California  and 
possibly  Mexico.  It  occurs  sympatrically  with  B.  lateralis  in  the  latter’s 
western-most  range  (fig.  15). 

DESCRIPTION:  Size.  Length  9.5  to  10.5  mm.;  width  4.5  to  4.8  mm.  Coloration. 
Elytra  of  both  sexes  blue  with  a  violaceous  cast  and  epipleura  blue;  head  and 
pronotum  ferrugineus  to  brown;  mandibles  red-brown  with  piceous  mesal  edges; 
antennal  segment  1  and  legs  ferrugineus;  antennal  segments  2-11  and  palpi  ferrugineus- 
brown;  mesepisterna  black;  sides  of  abdominal  sterna  ferrugineus  to  brown.  Head. 
Labrum  emarginate,  with  yellow  lateral  edges;  dorsal  surface  of  the  mentum  slightly 
convex  with  a  seta  at  each  anterior  corner;  bead  around  eyes  entire  but  finer  at 
antennal  base;  frons  with  deep  frontal  furrows  which  are  rugose  and  punctate; 
numerous  setae  arise  behind  eyes  and  on  top  of  head;  microsculpture  consists  of  very 
fine  isodiametric  meshes.  Pronotum.  Widest  at  apical  third  and  with  sides  moderately 
sinuate;  anterior  angles  not  prominent;  posterior  angles  acute  with  lateral  basal 
impressions  shallow;  lateral  margins  somewhat  reflexed  with  a  narrow  bead  of 
slightly  darker  color  than  pronotum;  disc  flat  with  many  deep  punctures  forming  a 
very  rugose  surface  and  with  many  setiferous  punctures  scattered  over  entire  surface; 
microsculpture  consists  of  small  isodiametric  meshes.  Elytra.  Male  elytra  truncate! 
widest  at  apical  third,  narrowing  slightly  to  humeri  which  are  not  prominent;  deeply 
costate,  microsculpture  consists  of  small  isodiametric  meshes;  pubescent  bands  occur 
in  each  interval  from  humerus  to  apex.  Female  elytra  similar,  but  proportionately 
wider  and  flatter  than  those  of  male  in  apical  third.  Aedeagus  (fig.  6).  Phallus  cylin¬ 
drical  and  ending  in  a  blunt  point;  with  apical  sixth  twisted  very  slightly;  micro¬ 
sculpture  lacking.  Endophallus  bears  a  lightly  pigmented  bilobed  virga  which  is  fused 
apically. 

CALIFORNIA  LOCALITY  RECORDS:  76  paratypes  were  examined. 
Los  Angeles  County:  (Pasadena)  CAS,  (San  Francisquito  Canyon)  LACM, 
(Los  Angeles)  LACM,  (Azusa)  LACM,  (Tujunga  Creek)  LACM;  Orange 
County:  (Black  Star  Canyon)  ATM;  Riverside  County:  (Hemet)  VVB, 
(Palm  Canyon)  LACM,  (Palm  Springs)  ATM;  San  Bernadino  County: 
(Mojave  River)  CAS;  San  Diego  County:  (Jamul)  CAS,  (Pamo  Valley) 
LACM,  (Mission  Valley)  SDNHM. 

DERIVATION  OF  THE  NAME:  Latin,  favus  —  honeycomb;  collis — 
neck;  referring  to  the  strongly  punctured  thorax  of  members  of  this  species. 

DISCUSSION:  This  species  is  one  of  four  whose  members  have  pubes¬ 
cence  covering  the  entire  elytra.  The  deeply  punctate  pronotum  is  a  good 
field  recognition  character. 


Brachinus  tschernikhi  Mannerheim 

Brachinus  tschernikhi  Mannerheim,  1843:  184. 

Brachinus  puncticollis  LeConte,  1858:  28,  (NOMEN  NUDUM). 

In  LeConte’s  1862  revision  this  name  was  omitted. 

TYPE  LOCALITY:  “California.” 

TYPE  SPECIMENS:  The  types  of  this  species  are  presumed  lost. 
The  author  has  contacted  the  museum  at  the  University  of  Helsinki  in 
attempting  to  locate  the  types.  Mr.  Meinander,  the  Curator,  states  that  these 
types  are  not  in  the  Mannerheim  collection.  Material  collected  by  Tschernik 


14 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


Figures  10-13,  Brachinus  spp.  California  distribution  maps. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


15 


in  C  alifornia  was  sent  by  Fischer  von  Waldheim  to  Mannerheim  ( 1 843  ■ 
180).  If  this  material  were  reclaimed  by  von  Waldheim  it  would  be  either 
in  his  collection  at  the  University  of  Moscow  or  in  Leningrad  but  A  G 
Ponomarenko  in  Moscow  states  that  the  types  of  B.  tschernikhi  are  not  in 
the  Fischer  von  Waldheim  collection.  Dr.  O.  L.  Kryzhanovskii  states  that 
the  types  are  not  in  the  Leningrad  Museum,  either.  The  University  of 
Moscow  does  have  three  specimens,  in  the  Motschulsky  collection  labelled 
'  B.  tschernikhi,  California.”  It  is  possible  that  Motschulsky  could  have 
seen  the  Mannerheim  types  and  subsequently  identified  his  own  specimens 
under  that  name.  It  is  also  conceivable  that  these  specimens  actually  were 
Mannerheim  s  type  specimens,  but  there  is  no  concrete  evidence  indicating 
that  to  be  the  case.  The  following  description  is  based  on  these  three 
specimens,  because  of  the  assumption  that  they  were  at  least  compared 
with  the  “types”  by  Motschulsky,  even  if  they  are  not  Mannerheim’s 
actual  type  specimens. 


DISTRIBUTION:  This  species  has  a  very  limited  range  in  central 
California,  from  Lake  County  to  Merced  County,  but  it  also  inhabits  parts 
of  Oregon  (fig.  16).  F 


Fl!inS  nf  hlh°^'v  ^  u,  L  8fu  7.,to  9  5  mm.;  width  4.2  to  4.4  mm.  Coloration. 
>t  a  of  both  sexes  blue  with  blue  epipleura;  head  and  pronotum  ferrugineus 

(sometimes  varying  from  a  yellowish  shade  to  ferrugineus);  mandibles  piceous 

veJvndarkSeSntS  H1-"2,  T’  anfd  fr°nS  ferru8meus’  segments  3-11  black;  moSthparts 
C1PPT  uChmg  C°  °r  °,f  OUter  seSments  °f  antennae;  meseipsterna  and  venter 
Eeaf-  Labrum  entire;  dorsal  surface  of  mentum  slightly  convex  with  a  seta 
at  each  anterior  corner;  bead  around  eyes  entire;  eyes  very  prominent;  frons  with 

tnondofabpnadeeP  and  ,rutgose  frontal  furrows;  a  few  setae  arise  behind  eyes  and  on 
p  of  head,  microsculpture  consists  of  small  isodiametric  meshes.  Pronotum.  Widest 
<.t  middle  with  deeply  sinuate  sides  behind;  anterior  angles  very  prominent-  posterior 
angles  very  prominent,  acute,  with  lateral  basal  impressions  deep;  lateral  margins 
reflexed  with  a  definite  bead;  disc  flat,  slightly  rugose  down  midline;  sefiferous 
punctures  sparsely  covering  dorsal  surface;  microsculpture  consists  of  small  isodia- 
TCSh®S’  EXtm'  Maule  e,lytra  truncate,  widest  at  apical  third  narrowing  very 
li“ct  P  Kinen  humen;  barely  costate;  microsculpture  consists  of  small  isodiametric 
.  es,  pubescence  sparse  but  covering  elytra,  occurring  in  all  intervals  Female 

AedealT  fii  ^  S!jghtly  than  thole  of  male  in  apicidhalfi 

l-.pi-fnf  Th' g'  I  TPn  u  °ng  Wlth  a  ndge  at  the  dorsal  apex;  microsculpture 
t  eking  The  endophallus  bears  a  poorly  pigmented  virga  consisting  of  two  lateral 
basal  plates  with  a  small  median  fin  on  the  ventral  side,  and  fused  a?  the  apex 


CALIFORNIA  LOCALITY  RECORDS:  47  specimens  were  examined 
Lake  County:  (Clear  Lake)  CAS,  (Cache  Creek)  ATM,  (Lower  Lake)' 
CAS,  Merced  County:  (Los  Banos)  CAS;  Sacramento  County  (Sacra- 

T™0),^IIV!  ^™;  Yol°  County;  (Davis)  UIM  CAS  ATM,  (Cause  Way) 
ATM,  (Clarksburg)  ATM.  J 


DLS<7.ySS!ON:  Memt»ers  of  this  species  are  the  darkest  in  color  of  all 
the  California  Brachtnus.  The  entire  venter  is  black,  unlike  any  other 
species  The  black  antennal  segments  are  also  unique  (except  in  B  fidelis 
which  has  the  3rd  and  4th  segments  dark).  The  aedeagus  closely  resembled 

at  of  B  fidelis,  which  also  indicates  a  close  phylogenetic  relationship 
between  these  species.  ^  1 


16 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


Figures  14-17,  Brachinus  spp.  California  distribution  maps. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


17 


Brachinus  imperialensis  Erwin,  NEW  SPECIES 
TYPE  LOCALITY:  Potholes,  Imperial  County,  California. 

TYPE  SPECIMENS.  The  holotype  male  and  allotype  female  have 
been  deposited  in  the  entomological  museum  at  the  California  Academy 
of  Sciences  in  San  Francisco.  Both  were  collected  by  E.  P.  Van  Duzee  at 
the  type  locality,  on  April  9,  1923.  Eighteen  paratypes  collected  on  various 
dates  and  at  various  localities  are  indicated  in  the  CALIFORNIA  LOCAL¬ 
ITY  RECORDS  and  they  have  been  returned  to  the  museums  also 
indicated  there. 

DISTRIBUTION:  This  species  is  restricted  to  desert  habitats  along  the 
Colorado  River  and  outlets  of  the  Salton  Sea  in  Imperial  County  (fig.  17). 

DESCRIPTION:  Size.  Length  9  to  10.5  mm.;  width  4  to  4.1  mm.  Coloration. 
Elytra  ot  both  sexes  blue  with  a  violeceous  cast  and  with  epipleura  blue*  head  and 
pronotum  ferrugineus;  mandibles  piceous  at  tips  and  on  mesal  edges’-  antennal 
segment  1  ferrugmo-testaceous;  antennal  segments  2-11,  legs,  palpi,  ’and  frons 
terrugmeus;  mesepisterna  and  venter  ferrugineus;  sides  of  abdominal  sterna  black. 
Head.  Lab  rum  slightly  emarginate;  dorsal  surface  of  the  mentum  convex  with  a 
seta  arising  at  each  anterior  corner;  bead  around  eyes  very  weak;  frons  with  deep 
frontal  furrows  which  are  somewhat  rugose;  numerous  setae  arise  behind  eyes  and 
a  lew  from  top  of  the  head;  microsculpture  consists  of  small  isodiametric  meshes. 

tonotum.  Widest  just  before  middle  and  with  sides  moderately  sinuate;  anterior 
angles  prominent,  finely  acute,  with  lateral  basal  impressions  moderately  deep-  lateral 
margins  narrow  with  a  dark  lateral  bead;  disc  slightly  convex,  barely  rugose  down 
sparsely  pubescent  at  base  and  at  anterior  corners;  microsculpture  consists 
ol  finely  isodiametric  meshes.  Elytra.  Male  elytra  truncate,  sides  almost  parallel  but 
narrowing  slightly  toward  humeri  which  are  not  at  all  prominent;  barely  costate; 
microsculpture  consists  of  small  isodiametric  meshes;  pubescence  sparsely  covering 
elytra,  occurring  in  all  intervals.  Female  elytra  similar,  but  proportionately  slightly 
wider  than  those  of  male  in  apical  third.  Aedeagus  (fig.  8).  Phallus  asymmetrical, 
ending  in  a  rounded  point,  with  apical  third  twisted  considerably;  microsculpture 
lacking.  Endophallus  bears  a  poorly  pigmented  virga  consisting  of  two  lateral  basal 
lobes,  which  are  fused  apically. 

CALIFORNIA  LOCALITY  RECORDS:  18  paratypes  were  examined. 
Imperial  County:  (Potholes)  CAS,  (Yuma)  CAS,  (Palo  Verde)  UIM, 
(Holtville)  CAS,  (El  Centro)  CAS,  (Brawley)  CAS,  (Calipatria)  CAS, 
(Calexico)  ATM;  Riverside  County:  (Blythe)  CAS;  San  Bernadino 
County:  (Needles)  CAS. 

DERIVATION  OF  THE  NAME:  Imperial  County — the  place  the  types 
were  collected;  Latin,  ensis — denoting  place,  locality  or  country. 

DISCUSSION:  Members  of  this  species  are  very  similar  to  their  more 
western  counterpart,  B.  favicollis,  but  they  lack  the  strong  punctations 
and  the  pubescence.  Also,  the  elytra  are  scarcely  costate  in  B .  imperialensis. 
The  alkali  river  bank  habitat  of  this  species  is  quite  different  from  the 
run-off  stream  environment  of  B.  favicollis. 

Brachinus  velutinus  Erwin,  NEW  SPECIES 

TYPE  LOCALITY:  Davis,  Yolo  County,  California. 

TYPE  SPECIMENS:  The  holotype  male  and  allotype  female  have 
been  deposited  in  the  entomological  museum  at  the  University  of  California, 
Davis,  California.  Both  were  collected  at  the  type  locality  by  A.  T.  McClay, 
on  September  1,  1949.  Fifteen  paratypes  collected  on  various  dates  and 


18 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


at  various  localities  are  indicated  in  the  CALIFORNIA  LOCALITY 
RECORDS  and  were  returned  to  the  museums  also  indicated  there. 

DISTRIBUTION:  This  species  has  been  collected  from  only  four 
locations  in  Central  California  (fig.  17). 

DESCRIPTION:  Size.  Length  7  to  8.2  mm.;  width  3.2  to  3.4  mm.  Coloration. 
Elytra  of  both  sexes  blue  with  a  violaceous  cast  and  with  epipleura  blue;  head  and 
pronotum  ferrugineus;  mandibles  piceous  at  tips  and  along  mesal  edges,  antennal 
segment  1  ferrugino-testaceous;  antennal  segments  2-11,  legs,  palpi,  mesepisterna 
ferrugineus;  sides  of  abdominal  sterna  brown  to  piceous.  Head.  Labrum  entire; 
dorsal  surface  of  mentum  flat  with  a  seta  at  each  anterior  corner  and  a  few  along 
caudal  edge;  bead  on  dorsal  part  of  eyes  only;  frons  with  very  shallow  frontal 
furrows'  only  a  few  setae  arise  behind  eyes  and  on  top  of  head;  microsculpture 
consists  of  very  fine  isodiametric  meshes.  Pronotum.  Widest  just  behind  apical  margin 
with  sides  moderately  sinuate  behind;  anterior  angles  slightly  prominent;  posterior 
angles  prominent,  acute,  with  lateral  margins  slightly  reflexed  without  a  definite 
bead;  lateral  basal  impressions  shallow;  disc  flat,  and  barely  rugose  down  midline, 
with  dense  pubescence  on  entire  dorsal  surface;  microsculpture  consists  of  small 
isodiametric  meshes.  Elytra.  Male  elytra  truncate,  widest  at  apical  third  narrowing 
strongly  to  very  narrow  humeri  which  are  not  at  all  prominent;  not  costate;  micro¬ 
sculpture  consists  of  very  small  isodiametric  meshes,  pubescence  densely  covering 
elytra.  Female  elytra  similar,  but  proportionately  slightly  wider  than  those  of  male 
at  apical  third.  Aedeagus  (fig.  9).  Phallus  asymmetrical,  ending  in  a  twisted  blunt  knob; 
microsculpture  lacking.  Endophallus  bears  a  poorly  pigmented  virga  consisting  of  two 
lateral  plates  which  are  fused  apically. 

CALIFORNIA  LOCALITY  RECORDS:  15  paratypes  were  examined. 
Contra  Costa  County :  (Brentwood)  CAS;  Stanislaus  County:  (Newman) 
ATM;  Tulare  County:  (Visalia)  ATM;  Yolo  County:  (Davis)  CAS  ATM. 

DERIVATION  OF  THE  NAME:  Latin,  velutinus  =  velvet;  referring 
to  the  velvety-down  appearance  of  the  elytral  pubescence. 

DISCUSSION:  This  species  is  the  most  peculiar  of  all  the  California 
species.  Its  members,  with  their  narrow  shoulders  and  densely  pubescent 
prothorax  and  elytra,  do  not  appear  to  be  closely  related  to  any  other 
species  from  this  area.  The  twisted  aedeagus  would  seem  to  place  it,  how¬ 
ever,  near  B.  favicollis  and  B.  imperialensis. 


Literature  Cited 


BALL1 96 (X  In  R.  H.  Arnett,  The  Beetles  of  the  United  States.  The  Catholic  Univer¬ 
sity  of  America  Press.  Washington,  D.  C.  Fasc.  1:55-181,  illus. 

Bell,  R.  T.  .  A/f. 

1960.  A  Revision  of  the  genus  Chlaenius  Bonelli  in  North  America.  Misc. 

Pub.  Ent.  Soc.  Amer.  1:97-166,  142  figs. 

Blatchley,  W.  S. 

1910.  The  Coleoptera  of  Indiana.  1386  pp.,  illus. 


Chaudoir,  M.  de  ,  . 

1868.  Observations  synonymiques  sur  les  carabiques  de  1  Amenque  du  Nord 
Revue  et  Magasin  Zoologie  (2)20:283-301. 


Dejean,  P.  F.  M.  A. 

1831.  Species  general  des  Coleopteres 


de  la  collection  de  M.  le  Comte  Dejean. 


1837. 


Catalogue  des  Coleopteres  de  la  collection  de  M.  le  Comte  Dejean. 
Troisieme  edition,  revue,  corrigee  at  augmentee.  Paris.  503  pp. 


LeConte, 

1844. 


Descriptions  of  new  species  of  North  American  Coleoptera.  Proc.  Acad. 
Nat.  Sci.  Phila.  2:48-53. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


19 


858‘  wata.Iogue  of  Coleoptera  of  the  regions  adjacent  to  the  boundary  between 
Mexico  and  United  States.  Journ.  Acad.  Nat.  Sci.  Phila.  (2)4:9-42,  1  pi 

1862.  Notes  on  the  species  of  Brachinus  inhabiting  the  United  States  Proc 
Acad.  Nat.  Sci.  Phila.  14:523-525. 

Lindroth,  C.  H. 

1963.  The  ground-beetles  (Carabidae,  excl.  Cicindelinae)  of  Canada  and  Alaska 
Part  3.  Opusc.  Ent.  Suppl.  24:201-408,  figs.  102-207. 

Mannerheim,  C.  G.  von 

1843.  Beitrag  zur  Kiiferfauna  der  Aleutischen  Inseln,  der  Insel  Sitka  und  Neu- 
Cahformens.  Bull.  Soc.  Nat.  Moscou.  16(2) :  175-3 14. 

Motschulsky,  V. 

1859.  Coleopteres  nouveaux  de  la  Californie.  Bull.  Soc  Nat  Moscou 
32(2) :  122-185,  357-410,  2  pis. 

Snodgrass,  R.  E. 

1935.  Principles  of  insect  morphology.  New  York.  667  pp.,  illus. 

Weber,  F. 

1801.  Observationes  entomologicae,  etc.  Impensis  Bibliopolii  Academici  Novi 
Kiliae.  1 16  pp. 


LITERATURE  NOTICE 


A  REVISION  OF  THE  NORTH  AMERICAN  SPECIES  OF  ANTHICUS  S 
STR.  (COLEOPTERA:  ANTHICIDAE).  By  Floyd  G.  Werner.  Misc.  Publ.  Ent.’ 
Soc.  Amer.  4(5) :  193-242,  101  figs.  1964. — This  revision  contains  48  species;  21 
have  been  taken  south  of  the  U.S.A.  border,  16  overlap  between  the  USA  and 
Mexico  or  farther  south,  and  11  are  not  known  from  north  of  Mexico.  A  key  to 
species,  descriptions,  distributions,  illustrations  of  the  whole  beetle  and  genitalia, 
and  distribution  maps  of  a  few  species  are  included.  Also  included  is  a  key  to  all  the 
genera  of  Anthicidae  known  from  North  America  northward  of  Panama,  the  West 
Indies,  and  probably  all  that  are  to  be  found  in  northern  South  America. 

MONOGRAPHISCHE  BEARBEITUNG  DER  GATTUNG  AGATHIDIUM 
PANZER  (COLEOPTERA).  By  Joseph  Hlisnikovsky.  Acta  Ent.  Mus.  Nat.  Prague, 
Suppl.  5:1-255,  405  figs.  1964. — Descriptions  and  keys  to  7  subgenera  and  177  species 
are  included  in  this  comprehensive  world  revision  of  this  leiodid  genus.  Outline 
drawings  are  given  for  the  antennae  and  for  the  lateral  and  dorsal  views  of  the  body 
and  male  genitalia. 

COLEOPTERORUM  CATALOGUS  SUPPLEMENTA.  PARS  35  FASC  3 
CHRYSOMELIDAE:  HISPINAE.  CORRIGENDA  ET  ADDENDA.  By  E.  Uhmann’ 
Dr.  W.  Junk,  The  Hague.  Pp.  399-490.  1964.— Fascicles  1  and  2  of' the  Hispinae 
appeared  in  1957  and  1958. 


20 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


APHENOLIA  MONOGAMA  (CROTCH),  A  NEW 

COMBINATION 
(NITIDULIDAE:  COLEOPTERA) 

By  Lorin  R.  Gillogly 1  2 

The  species  Epuraea  monogama  Crotch  was  described  in  1874  as  the 
largest  known  Epuraea.  The  genus  Aphenolia  Reitter  was  established  in 
1884  for  a  single  very  large  species  from  Japan  which  was  separated  from 
Epuraea  by  its  size  and  on  the  basis  of  its  simple  hind  tarsi.  In  Epuraea 
the  first  three  tarsal  segments  of  each  leg  are  bilobed  but  the  hind  tarsi 
of  Epuraea  monogama  Crotch  are  simple.  I  am  therefore  transferring  mono¬ 
gama  to  Aphenolia  (NEW  COMBINATION). 

During  a  recent  exchange  of  specimens  with  Dr.  Sadanari  Hisamatsu  I 
received  two  examples  of  Aphenolia  pseudosoronia  Reitter  and  was  startled 
at  their  close  resemblance  to  Aphenolia  monogama  (Crotch).  Indeed, 
it  required  some  study  to  satisfy  myself  that  they  were  distinct.  In  Aphenolia 
pseudosoronia  Reitter  the  second  segment  of  the  antenna  is  about  one-hal 
the  length  of  the  third,  while  in  A.  monogama  (Crotch)  it  is  only  slightly 
shorter  than  the  third.  Also,  in  both  species  the  middle  tibiae  of  the  males 
are  dilated  on  the  inner  margin  near  the  tip.  In  A.  pseudosoronia  Reitter 
the  dilation  is  about  one-third  as  long  as  the  tibia,  while  it  is  about  one-fifth 
as  long  as  the  tibia  in  A.  monogama  (Crotch)  (Hisamatsu  1962). 

Hisamatsu  reports  A.  pseudosoronia  Reitter  from  Cryptoporus  ( Poly - 
porus)  volvatus  (Peck)  Hubbard  in  Japan.  Gillogly  (1954)  discussed 
A.  monogama  (Crotch)  from  the  same  fungus  in  California. 

The  rare  Epuraea  liebecki  Parsons  from  Arizona  is  of  similar  size  but 
nothing  has  been  published  as  to  its  host  nor  the  character  of  its  hind  tarsi. 
Judging  from  its  size,  it  may  yet  be  found  to  belong  to  the  genus  Aphenolia. 


Literature  Cited 


Gillogly,  L.  R.,  and  G.  M.  ,  ,  .  ~  „  Rllll  o 

1954  Notes  on  the  biology  of  Epuraea  monogama  (Crotch).  Coleop.  bull  8 

(3&4) : 63 -67. 

Hisamatsu,  S.  ,  ^  0  „  ,.  T  \ 

1962.  On  some  beetles  of  the  pouch  fungus.  Ageha  10:8-9,  5  figs,  (in  Japanese). 


1  port  Entomologist,  California  Department  of  Agriculture,  Bureau  of  Plant 
Quarantine,  San  Pedro,  California. 

2  This  is  published  under  my  name  at  the  insistence  of  Dr.  Hisamatsu  who  furnished 
specimens  and  who  sent  me  a  translation  of  his  paper. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


21 


THE  NEW  COMBINATION  LUCIDOTA  ARMATA  AND  A 

NOTE  ON  LUCIDOTA  EUCERA 
(COLEOPTERA:  LAMPYRIDAE) 

By  Frank  A.  McDermott1 


Lucidota  armata  (Gorham),  NEW  COMBINATION 

Photinus  armatus  Gorham,  1884.  Biol.  Centr.-Amer.,  Ins.,  Coleop 
3(2) : 265,  pi.  12,  fig.  2. 

It  is  somewhat  difficult  to  understand  why  Gorham  called  this  species 
Photinus  in  spite  of  his  explanation;  however,  his  use  of  Photinus  included 
also  Macrolampis,  Ellychnia,  and  some  species  now  listed  as  Lucidota. 
As  some  features  of  Lucidota  armata  are  not  developed  by  Gorham,  a 
redescription  of  the  species  is  given  below.  The  species  was  described  from 
Panama.  I  have  received  7  males  and  4  females  from  Peru. 

One  of  the  seven  males  was  selected  for  this  description,  collected  at  Avispas, 
Peru,  September  10,  1962,  by  Luis  E.  Pena. 

Dimensions,  6.0  mm.  long  by  1.8  mm.  broad;  subparallel.  Superficially  resembles 
Pyropyga. 

Pronotum,  0.95  x  1.6  mm.;  semi-elliptic;  broad  black  panduriform  vitta  from 
base  to  above  eyes,  with  a  narrow  median  channel.  Base  a  smooth  curve,  leaving  the 
angles  acute  and  produced.  Borders  transparent  except  tinged  brownish  forward  of 
the  black  vitta.  Disk  pink  between  vitta  and  lateral  borders;  latter  coarsely  punctate, 
disk  very  finely  so;  sparse,  short  pale  villosity.  Scutellum  relatively  large,  black,  finely 
punctulate,  sparsely  hairy.  Mesonotal  plates  black. 

Elytra,  4.4  x  0.9  mm.;  translucent  dark  brown,  appearing  black  over  body;  very 
narrow  explanate  margins  slightly  paler  than  disk.  Very  rugose,  with  fairly  dense 
villosity  especially  pronounced  on  sides  and  suture;  latter  not  pale. 

Frons  dark  brown,  slightly  concave.  Maxillary  palpi  very  short  and  blunt;  brown. 
Labial  palpi  very  small,  terminal  article  securiform,  pale  yellowish.  Mandibles  small. 
Antennae  broad,  compressed,  black,  except  last  article  white;  slightly  serrate;  3.45 
mm.  long. 

Prosternum  pink,  meso-  and  metasterna  practically  black.  Ventral  abdominal 
segments  2  to  7  reddish  brown;  8th  long,  medially  convex,  with  sharp  median  point, 
apically  black.  9th  (genital)  segment  large,  like  convex  portion  of  8th  (fig.  1). 

Abdominal  tergites  and  pygidium  black,  latter  convex,  posterior  edge  rounded. 

Posterior  coxae  and  femora  whitish. 

Aedeagus  composed  of  a  slightly  curved,  medially  channeled  median  lobe  and  two 
unsymmetrical  lateral  lobes,  one  of  which  (the  left)  is  divided  into  a  narrow  spirally 
twisted  portion  with  a  very  acute  apex  which  may  form  a  hook  in  some  specimens, 
and  a  shorter  portion  bearing  a  strong  recurved  hook.  Right  lateral  lobe  bears  a  long 
yellow  projection  with  a  small  protuberance  on  the  side;  this  structure  projects  at  a 
right  angle  to  the  body  on  the  right  side  in  dorsal  view  in  three  specimens. 

Gorham  gives  no  explanation  of  his  aedeagal  drawings,  in  which  a 
is  apparently  a  lateral  view  with  the  lateral  lobes  removed,  and  b  is  a 
ventral  view  of  the  median  lobe.  Both  of  these  agree  with  the  present 
specimens  from  Peru.  Sketch  c  represents  the  complicated  arrangement 
of  the  lateral  lobes  and  differs  from  my  specimens  in  that  the  spiral  twist 


1  Wilmington.  Delaware. 


22 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


and  acute  point  of  one  of  the  portions  of  the  left  lobe  is  not  well  indicated, 
nor  is  the  recurved  hook  on  the  other  portion;  the  third  (right  hand) 
member  in  his  sketch  c  is  the  right  lateral  lobe  with  the  projection  shown 
at  an  angle  different  from  its  appearance  in  my  specimens.  The  entire 
arrangement  is  very  complicated  for  a  lampyrid. 

One  female  collected  at  Avispas,  Peru,  October  1,  1962,  by  Luis  E.  Pena  was 
selected  for  comparison  with  the  male. 

Dimension,  6.5  mm.  long  by  2.05  mm.  broad;  subparallel.  Generally  similar  to 
male;  antennae  nearly  as  long.  Last  ventral  segment  broadly  subtriangular,  notched 
apically;  larval  luminous  organs  pronounced,  possibly  functional  (fig.  2). 

Variations:  the  pronotal  vitta  may  be  reduced  to  scattered  spots,  leaving  the  disk 
mainly  salmon-pink.  In  some  specimens  two  or  three  distal  antennal  articles  are 
white.  Total  length  varied  up  to  7.5  mm. 

In  view  of  the  remarkable  terminalia  this  species  should  perhaps  be 
made  the  type  of  a  new  genus,  as  suggested  by  Gorham. 


Figures  1-2,  Lucidota  armata.  1 — Outline  of  posterior  ventral  segments  of  male; 
note  projecting  point  at  left  side  of  segment  8.  2 — Outline  of  posterior  ventral 
segments  of  female. 

Figures  3-4,  Lucidota  eucera.  3 — Outline  of  posterior  ventral  segments  of  male; 
note  single  elliptical  luminous  organ  on  segment  6.  4 — Aedeagus;  left  to  right,  lateral, 
ventral,  and  dorsal  views. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


23 


Lucidota  eticera  E.  Olivier 


Lucidota  eucera  E.  Olivier,  1907.  In  Wytsman’s  Gen.  Ins.  53:20. 

Three  males  of  this  species  were  received  from  Peru;  the  species  was 
described  from  French  Guiana.  It  has  an  unusual  development  of  the 
genital  segment  (fig.  3)  and  a  relatively  large  aedeagus  (fig.  4). 


BOOK  REVIEW 


^  GROUND  BEETLES  (CARABIDAE,  EXCL.  CICINDELINAE)  OF 

CANADA  AND  ALASKA,  PART  3.  By  Carl  H.  Lindroth.  Opuscula  Entomologica 
Suppl.  24:201-408,  figs.  102-207,  1963.  (Price,  kr.  35:-;  $6.85.) 


This  volume  continues  the  monograph  of  the  Canadian  and  Alaskan  Carabidae 
started  in  1961  (see  Coleopt.  Bull.  16:106).  The  first  part,  the  introduction,  will 
be  published  after  the  text  has  been  completed. 


The  importance  of  part  3  is  apparent  to  any  student  of  Coleoptera  when  it  is 
pointed  out  that  the  work  is  concerned  with  the  genus  Bembidion.  The  161  species 
treated  include  16  new  species,  bringing  the  total  for  the  genus  in  North  America  to 
about  411  species.  Most  of  the  species  occur  north  of  Washington,  D.  C.,  to  about 
the  tree  line.  Thus  a  substantial  portion  of  the  range  of  the  genus  is  covered  in 
this  work.  The  care  in  which  it  is  written  and  the  detail  of  the  study  make  it  the 

standard  work  at  the  present  time  and  it  will  replace  all  previous  work  for  years 
to  come. 


It  might  well  be  added  that  any  Coleopterist  or  entomology  library  that  does  not 
buy  this  series  as  issued  will  regret  it  when  it  is  no  longer  available  at  the  publisher’s 
price. — Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr. 


LITERATURE  NOTICE 


CATALOGUE  OF  THE  CANTHONINI  (COL.  SCARAB.)  INHABITING  THE 
WESTERN  HEMISPHERE.  By  M.  A.  Vulcano  and  F.  S.  Pereira  C.M.F.  Ent.  Arb. 
Mus.  Frey  15(2)  :570-685.  1964. — This  is  a  synonymical  list  with  literature  citations 
to  every  mention  of  each  genus  and  species.  Geographical  distributions  by  countries, 
a  bibliography  of  articles  not  mentioned  by  BJackwelder,  and  an  index  are  also  given 


24 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


BOOK  REVIEW 

CURCULIONIDAE  OF  AMERICA  NORTH  OF  MEXICO.  A  KEY  TO  THE 
GENERA.  By  David  G.  Kissinger,  v,  143  pp.,  59  figs.  Taxonomic  Publications,  South 
Lancaster,  Massachusetts.  1964.  (Price,  $7.50.) 

The  purpose  of  this  work  is  to  provide  keys  to  the  nearly  400  curculionid  genera 
occurring  in  North  America  north  of  Mexico.  The  author  has  admirably  fulfilled  this 
purpose. 

In  this  work  42  subfamilies  are  treated.  Keys  are  provided  for  the  subfamilies, 
and  each  subfamily  is  provided  with  keys  to  the  genera.  No  attempt  has  been  made 
at  identifications  on  the  species  level.  For  each  subfamily  and  genus  treated  there  is 
a  general  account  of  the  group.  The  account  of  each  genus  includes  the  author,  date, 
synonyms,  principal  references  to  keys  to  species,  the  habitat  and  habits,  and  the 
distribution  (by  states  and  provinces). 

Structural  features  that  are  used  in  identifying  genera  have  been  used  in  the  con¬ 
struction  of  the  keys.  A  section  on  the  taxonomically  important  adult  structures  is 
given  but  the  treatment  is  not  and  was  not  intended  to  be  a  complete  study  of  the 
adult  curculionid  morphology. 

The  keys  represent  an  improvement  over  those  of  Bradley,  A  Manual  of  the  Genera 
of  Beetles  of  America,  North  of  Mexico,  Ithaca,  N.  Y.  1930,  and  Arnett,  The  Beetles 
of  the  United  States  (A  Manual  for  Identification),  Catholic  Univ.  of  America  Press, 
Washington,  D.  C.  1960.  There  are  a  few  keys  with  which  the  user  is  apt  to  have 
trouble.  Difficult  groups  are  still  difficult.  For  example,  in  the  key  to  the  genera  of 
Subfamily  No.  1,  which  contains  44  couplets,  all  17  genera  from  couplet  29  to  the 
end  are  hard  to  separate. 

The  work  is  not  without  errors.  Most  of  these  should  have  been  corrected  in 
galley  proof.  An  erratum  sheet  will  have  to  be  published  but  a  few  of  the  more 
obvious  are  pointed  out  below.  The  spelling  of  the  specific  name  of  the  cotton  boll 
weevil  on  p.  55  is  grandis,  not  grandus;  p.  5,  Magdalis,  not  Magdalus;  p.  74,  Peri- 
gastes  should  be  Perigaster;  p.  130,  fig.  30  and  p.  37,  Cyrtepistomus  instead  of 
Cyrtepistomis.  There  is  a  faulty  reference  on  page  67-68;  under  the  generic  name 
Cryptorhynchus  the  author  says  to  consult  Sleeper  (1955a)  for  a  key  to  separate 
the  species.  That  work  contains  the  description  of  seven  new  species  of  weevils  in 
miscellaneous  genera  but  there  are  no  keys  to  the  Cryptorhynchus. 

Students  wishing  to  pick  a  group  of  curculionids  for  study  will  find  this  work  most 
helpful  as  the  author  has  indicated  in  many  instances  which  genera  are  in  need  of 
revision  and  where  keys  to  the  species  are  desired. 

The  book  represents  a  much  needed  and  valuable  contribution  to  our  entomological 
literature;  it  will  be  indispensable  to  anyone  interested  in  the  Curculionidae  of 
America  north  of  Mexico. — Rose  Ella  Warner,  Ent.  Res.  Div.,  A.R.S.,  U.  S.  Depart¬ 
ment  of  Agriculture,  Washington,  D.  C. 


LITERATURE  NOTICE 

DIRECTORY  OF  ZOOLOGICAL  (AND  ENTOMOLOGICAL)  SPECIMEN 
COLLECTIONS  OF  TROPICAL  INSTITUTIONS.  By  United  Nations  Educational, 
Scientific  and  Cultural  Organization  (UNESCO),  Paris.  31  pp.  1962.  (Price:  $1.00  U.S., 
3,50  N.F.) — This  is  another  in  the  series  Humid  Tropics  Research.  More  than  40 
collections  are  listed,  with  short  statements  on  each  as  to  content  or  specializations, 
identification,  and  exchange. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


25 


A  NEW  FOSSIL  BRUCHID  GENUS 
AND  ITS  RELATIONSHIPS  TO  MODERN  GENERA 
(COLEOPTERA:  BRUCHIDAE:  PACHYMERINAE) 

By  John  M.  Kingsolver1 


The  study  of  most  fossil  beetles  is  difficult  because  of  the  fragmentary 
nature  of  many  of  the  representative  specimens.  Only  amber  and  calcareous 
nodules  preserve  specimens  so  that  they  may  be  observed  from  all  angles. 
In  most  fossil  beetles,  the  specimen  is  usually  an  impression  of  a  crushed, 
often  disarranged,  individual  or  fragments  of  an  individual  which  must  be 
observed  as  is,  without  recourse  to  a  more  convenient  or  more  advantageous 
view,  to  observe  details  of  structure.  Morphological  characters  necessary 
to  place  the  specimen  in  a  genus  or  even  in  a  family  are  often  indistinct 
or  missing;  thus,  its  placement  becomes  a  matter  of  the  experience  and 
background  of  the  worker  in  his  observations  of  habitus  of  a  wide  range 
of  families  and  genera  of  Coleoptera.  The  classification  of  fossil  beetles 
can  probably  never  become  as  exact  and  definitive  as  that  of  extant 
beetles;  consequently,  fossil  genera  and  species  should  be  judged  by  differ¬ 
ent  standards  than  recent  taxa.  A  species  based  on  an  elytron  or  on  another 
part  of  the  body  usually  lacks  essential  characteristics  for  generic  placement 
or  association  with  other  species.  The  profusion  of  species  names  resulting 
from  past  descriptions  of  this  type  should  be  regarded  merely  as  an  index 

to  specimens  rather  than  as  a  like  number  of  species  entities  in  the 
biological  sense. 

Raiely  does  a  worker  have  the  good  fortune  to  observe  a  series  of  fossils 
from  the  same  bed,  with  common  characteristics  in  sufficient  detail  to 
permit  the  construction  of  a  fairly  detailed  description  of  a  taxon  Yet 
such  an  opportunity  presented  itself  recently  during  the  examination  of  a 
number  of  fossil  impressions  of  Bruchidae  from  the  H.  F.  Wickham 
collection  in  the  U.  S.  National  Museum.  Imprints  of  15  specimens,  pre- 
served  in  various  positions,  were  observed  to  have  certain  common  features 
which  linked  the  entire  series.  A  discussion  of  these  characteristics  follows 
the  description.  Because  differentiating  characteristics  of  species  of  modern 
Bruchidae  often  rest  in  the  male  genitalia  and  because  insufficient  detail 
is  present  in  these  fossil  impressions  to  distinguish  “species,”  I  feel  that 
the  best  course  to  take  with  the  present  specimens  is  to  assume  that  the 

described  species  listed  below,  and  the  series  examined, 
which  contained  both  identified  and  unidentified  specimens,  are  representa¬ 
tive  of  an  apparently  extinct  new  genus,  which  is  described  herein  for 
comparison  with  modern  Bruchidae. 

The  following  descriptions  are  written  as  though  the  actual  insects  were 
being  observed  although  details  of  the  surfaces  in  the  fossils  are  negative 
impressions  of  the  original  specimens. 


Washington1  Divisi°n’  Agr  Res-  Serv  ’  U*  S-  Department  of  Agriculture, 


26 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


Oligobruchus  Kingsolver,  NEW  FOSSIL  GENUS 


Colors  are  not  preserved  in  Florissant  beetles  and  there  are  no  indica¬ 
tions  of  pattern  either  in  the  integument  or  in  the  vestiture  of  these 

specimens. 

Head:  Eyes  apparently  deeply  emarginate,  facets  not  evident;  vertex  finely  punctate, 
frons  more  coarsely  punctate;  vertical  interocular  carina  distinct.  Details  ot  mout  - 
parts  not  visible.  Antennal  segments  serrate  (preserved  in  part  in  only  one  specimen). 

Prothorax:  Disc  coarsely,  very  densely  foveolate  (impressions  in  fossils  coarsely 
and  densely  granulate  in  appearance);  vestiture  not  apparent;  no  distinct  asperities 
evident  on  disc,  which  appears  to  be  somewhat  saddlelike  and  not  expanded  laterally; 
posterior  margin  of  disc  not  markedly  lobed,  apparently  evenly  arcuate,  fine  sub- 
marginal  groove  present  on  disc  in  two  specimens;  lateral  carina  excellently  preserved 
Ttwo  ?pe8cTmensand  not  prominent  nor  elevated.  Venter  finely  and  densely  punctate, 
prosternum  moderately  long  before  coxae,  intercoxal  process  very  narrow;  coxae 
moderately  elongated;  trochantinal  fossae  well  preserved  in  two  specimens,  post- 
coxal  region  obliterated.  No  specimens  had  anterior  legs  preserved. 

Mesothorax:  Scutellum  well-marked  in  only  one  specimen,  quadrate,  slightly 
longer  than  wide,  perceptibly  emarginate  at  apex.  Elytra  separately  rounded  at  apices, 
surface  without  evident  asperities;  striae  10,  well-defined,  regularly  placed  with 
elongate,  nearly  confluent  punctures,  interspaces  not  punctate,  tenth  stria  reaching  to 
apical  third;  no  evidence  of  basal  amalgamation  of  striae  nor  of  basal  carinate 
tubercles  or  basal  strial  teeth.  Mesopleuron  with  epimeron  and  episternum  of  nearly 
equal  size,  pleural  suture  dividing  them  diagonally.  Mesosternal  area  trapezoidal  with 
intercoxal  process  flat,  mesocoxae  well  separated;  post-coxal  ridge  evenly  arcuate 
parallel  to  posterior  margin  of  coxal  cavity;  trochantinal  fossa  distinct  in  one  speci¬ 
men;  surfaces  of  pleural  and  sternal  areas  finely  and  densely  punctate.  No  specimens 
with’ mesothoracic  legs  preserved. 

Metathorax:  Flight  wings  not  exposed  in  any  of  the  specimens.  Pleural  and  sterna 
areas  not  especially  modified.  Parasutural  sulci  present  on  each  side  of  pleurosternal 
suture  which  separates  metepisternum  and  metasternal  region,  the  sulcus  °n  epis¬ 
ternum  curving  dorsad  parallel  to  anterior  margin  of  sclente  and  sulcus  on  sternal 
sclerite  curving  mesad  to  meet  posterior  margin  of  post-coxal  ridge  of  mesothoracic 
coxal  cavides8Median  sulcus  of  sternal  area  not  evident  in  any  of  the  specimens. 
Metathoracic  coxae  about  twice  as  long  as  wide.  Metathoracic  tro^°tl1n5^  Pr® 
served  in  several  specimens.  Metathoracic  femur  strongly  swollen,  about  1.5  times  as 
long  as  wide,  outer  ventral  margin  finely  serrate  but  no  other  dentation  evident. 
Tibia  strongly  arcuate  parallel  to  ventral  profile  of  femur,  bicarinate  on  outer  face, 
apex  acuminate;  details  of  terminal  tibial  spurs  (if  any)  and  of  tarsal  segments 

obliterated.  . 

Abdomen:  Short,  rather  stocky,  with  5  visible  abdominal  stermtes,  last  stermte 
shallowly  emarginate  (evidently  males)  in  two  specimens;  pygidium  finely,  densely 
punctate,  broadly  triangular  in  outline  (apparently  only  the  pygidium  is  sclerotized 
with  the  two  preceding  terga  membranous,  which  distinguishes  it  from  Kytorhinus 
Fischer);  intercoxal  process  acutely  triangular. 

Length  of  body  excluding  head:  3.5  to  4.5  mm. 


The  size  suggests  a  beetle  of  about  the  dimensions  and  form  of  Algarobius 
prosopis  (LeConte)  although  the  preserved  details  of  structure  are  quite 
different  from  that  genus  and  species. 

Type-species  here  designated:  Bruchus  florissantensis  Wickham,  1912: 
30-31. 

The  following  additional  fossil  species  are  tentatively  placed  in  Oligo¬ 
bruchus  pending  examination  of  type  specimens:  Bruchus  scudderi  Wick¬ 
ham,  1912:31,  Bruchus  haywardi  Wickham,  1912:31-32,  Bruchus  wdsom 
Wickham,  1913:9-20,  Bruchus  submersus  Wickham,  1914:481,  Bruchus 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


27 


Figures  1-5,  Oligobruchus,  new  fossil  genus.  1 — O.  fiorisscintensis  (Wickham). 
haywardi  (Wickham).  3 — O.  scudderi  (Wickham).  4  and  5 — O.  fiorisscintensis. 
All  specimens  determined  by  Wickham.  (Photographs  by  Jack  Scott,  Smithsonian 
Institution.) 


28 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


primoticus  Wickham,  1914:480-481.  Their  placement  here  is  based  on 
descriptions  and  illustrations  in  the  literature,  and  on  specimens  in  the 
U.  S.  National  Museum  identified  by  Wickham  as  follows:  Bruchus  floris- 
santensis — 3,  Bruchus  near  florissantensis — 1,  Bruchus  haywardi—2 , 
Bruchus  scudderi — 4.  Five  additional  specimens  which  I  regard  as  Oligo- 
bruchus  sp.  completed  the  study  series. 

Wickham’s  illustration  of  primoticus  (pi.  14,  fig.  1)  shows  five  denticles 
on  the  lower  margin  of  the  hind  femur.  1  have  not  seen  the  specimen,  but 
it  is  possible  that  their  presence  indicates  dentation  of  the  mesal  carina 
of  Oligobruchus,  which  was  missing  in  every  specimen  I  examined.  In  only 
two  specimens  was  a  finely  serrate  lateral  carina  evident.  Wickham  also 
illustrated  a  serrate  antenna  for  primoticus  similar  to  that  in  the  only 
specimen  I  examined  with  an  antenna  retained.  It  is  significant  that  this 
antenna  is  also  similar  to  the  antennae  in  Pachymerus  Thunberg. 

Discussion  of  Relationships 

The  generic  description  is  based  on  a  series  of  15  specimens  selected 
because  they  were  preserved  in  various  positions  yet  share  at  least  one  of 
five  significant  morphological  characters.  Eight  of  the  specimens  have  all 
5  characters  and  1 1  have  at  least  4.  These  specimens  serve  to  associate 
the  entire  series,  some  of  which  were  not  preserved  in  a  favorable  position 
to  exhibit  more  than  one  or  two  of  the  characters. 

Common  to  all  of  the  specimens  is  a  densely  foveolate  prothoracic 
disc  (fig.  1),  which  to  my  knowledge  is  not  developed  to  this  extreme 
in  any  of  the  modern  Bruchidae,  but  is  approached  to  some  degree  in 
certain  species  of  Pachymerus. 

Next  in  frequency  of  occurrence  is  a  strongly  arcuate  metatibia  with 
a  bicarinate  lateral  face  (fig.  4).  This  character  is  found  in  13  of  the  15 
specimens.  This  specialization  of  the  tibia  is  present  in  both  of  the  sub¬ 
families  Pachymerinae  and  Bruchinae,  in  the  latter  in  species  groups  near 
Caryedes  Hummel.  However,  the  deeply  foveolate  prothorax  and  the 
parasutural  sulcus  (explained  below)  are  never  found  in  the  latter 
subfamily. 

Concurrent  with  the  arcuate  metatibia  in  modern  Bruchids  is  a  strongly 
inflated  metafemur  (figs.  1  &  4).  Eleven  of  the  15  fossil  specimens  possess 
a  partial  or  complete  impression  of  this  type  of  femur. 

In  most  of  the  Pachymerinae  and  Amblycerinae  in  the  Bruchidae  and 
in  many  of  the  primitive  Chrysomelidae  and  Cerambycidae,  the  pleuro- 
sternal  suture  of  the  metathorax  is  paralleled  on  either  side  by  a  narrow 
but  distinct  sulcus  which  I  am  calling  the  parasutural  sulcus.  The  sulcus 
on  the  metasternal  sclerite  joins  the  post-coxal  ridge  of  the  mesocoxal 
cavities  and  the  sulcus  of  the  episternum  curves  antero-dorsad  to  parallel 
the  anterior  margin  of  this  sclerite,  then  bends  dorsad  still  further  and  ends 
near  the  dorsal  margin  of  the  episternum.  Nine  of  the  15  fossils  show  very 
clearly  the  impression  of  this  sulcus  (figs.  4  &  5). 

It  is  unfortunate  that  more  details  of  the  head,  antennae,  and  legs  are 
not  better  preserved  in  these  fossils.  In  these  body  area,  in  extant  Bruchidae, 
are  found  several  critical  characteristics  which,  if  known  in  the  fossils, 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


29 


might  help  in  determining  more  precisely  the  relationships  of  the  fossil 
genus.  Oligobruchus  undoubtedly  belongs  in  the  subfamily  Pachymerinae, 
but  1  know  of  no  described  genus  or  of  any  species  which  possesses  the 
peculiar  combination  of  characteristics  manifest  in  this  series  of  fossil 
Bruchidae.  In  the  key  to  the  genera  of  Bruchidae  of  the  United  States 
(Bridwell,  1946:53),  Oligobruchus  would  key  to  Caryobruchus  from  which 
it  may  be  distinguished  by  characters  given  below.  Perhaps  the  nearest 
extant  relatives  are  Caryopemon  giganteus  Pic,  Caryedon  languidus  (Gyll.) 
and  various  species  in  the  genus  Pachymerus.  All  of  these  taxa  have  in 
common  with  Oligobruchus  the  swollen  hind  femur,  carinate  frons,  strongly 
arcuate  hind  tibia  bicarinate  on  the  outer  face,  parasutural  sulci  (at  least 
in  the  species  listed  above  and  in  Pachymerus) ,  submarginal  groove  on  the 
prothoracic  disc,  subequal  mesepisternum  and  mesepimeron  and  the 
unmodified  striae  of  the  elytra. 

Oligobruchus  can  be  distinguished  from  Caryopemon  Jekel  by  the  fol¬ 
lowing:  In  Oligobruchus,  the  posterior  margin  of  the  prothoracic  disc  is 
evenly  arcuate  and  the  disc  is  densely  foveolate,  the  scutellum  is  subquad¬ 
rate,  the  pygidium  is  broadly  triangular,  and  the  intercoxal  process  of  the 
abdomen  is  acutely  triangular,  while  in  Caryopemon,  the  posterior  margin 
of  the  prothoracic  disc  is  deeply  and  broadly  lobed  mesally  and  sparsely 
punctate,  the  scutellum  is  triangular,  the  pygidium  is  vertically  narrowed 
and  the  intercoxal  area  of  the  abdomen  is  broadly  rounded.  A  character 
shared  by  these  two  genera  and  peculiar  to  them  in  this  subfamily  is  the 
saddlelike  prothoracic  disc  with  its  weak  lateral  margin. 

Both  Pachymerus  and  Caryedon  Schoenherr  are  distinguished  from 
Oligobruchus  by  their  expanded  prothoracic  margins,  sparsely  punctate 
prothoracic  disc,  and  shallowly  emarginate  eyes,  all  apparently  being 
primitive  Pachymerine  characters. 

The  other  two  Pachymerine  genera,  Caryoborus  Schoenherr  and  Caryo¬ 
bruchus  Bridwell,  lack  the  carinae  on  the  metatibia  found  in  Caryedon , 
Caryopemon,  Pachymerus  and  Oligobruchus  but  share  the  absence  of 
carinae  and  many  other  characters  with  Amblycerus  Thunberg,  another 
very  primitive  genus  in  the  subfamily  Amblycerinae.  This  condition  may 
indicate  that  a  smooth  external  face  is  a  primitive  character  in  the  Bruchidae 
cind  that  a  carinate  face  is  derived.  The  carinate  condition  is  very  common 
in  this  family. 

In  none  of  the  extant  Pachymerine  genera  is  the  prothoracic  disc  as 
densely  and  deeply  foveolate  as  in  Oligobruchus.  The  foveae  in  the  latter 
genus  are  very  deep  and  rounded  and  so  closely  approximate  that  the 
interspaces  are  carinate. 

Characteristics  possessed  by  Oligobruchus  which  I  deduce  to  be  primitive 
are  the  submarginal  groove  of  the  prothoracic  disc,  parasutural  sulci  of 
the  metathoracic  sclerites,  swollen  metafemur  and  correspondingly  arcuate 
metatibia,  subequal  mesepimeron  and  mesepisternum,  and  the  unmodified 
striae  of  the  elytra.  (Specialized  modifications  of  the  striae  in  Bruchidae 
include  basal  coalescence,  basal  asperities  and  denticles,  or  loss  of  one 
or  more  striae  or  parts  of  striae.)  Specialized  characters  are  the  strongly 
convex  saddlelike  pronotal  disc,  narrow  prosternal  process,  carinate  meta- 


30 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


tibia,  and  deeply  emarginate  eyes.  The  strongly  foveolate  prothorax  is 
probably  also  specialized. 

Comparison  of  Oligobruchus  with  other  genera  suggests  that  it  was 
representative  of  a  phyletic  line,  probably  now  extinct,  arising  near  the 
origin  of  the  line  or  lines  leading  to  the  modem  genera  Caryedon  and 
Pachymerus.  Although  it  possesses  many  primitive  characters  already 
deduced  from  the  study  of  the  extant  genera  in  Bruchidae  and  other 
families,  there  has  developed  in  its  evolution  a  combination  of  specialized 
characters  sufficiently  different  from  those  found  in  the  other  groups  to 
warrant  its  erection  as  a  new  fossil  genus. 


Food  Habits 

A  comparison  of  the  food  plants  of  the  extant  Pachymerinae  with  the 
plant  genera  listed  from  Florissant  by  MacGinitie  (1953)  indicates  little 
difficulty  of  correlation.  Species  of  the  modern  genera  Caryoborus  and 
Caryobruchus  breed  exclusively  in  palm  seeds,  species  presently  placed  in 
Pachymerus  attack  seeds  of  palms  or  legumes,  and  species  of  Caryedon 
and  Caryopemon  live  exclusively  in  legumes,  the  plant  family  which  is 
host  to  most  of  the  species  of  Bruchidae  in  the  world.  MacGinitie  found 
no  representatives  of  the  Palmaceae  in  his  study  but  did  list  nine  genera 
of  Leguminosae,  five  of  which  are  modern.  It  is  quite  possible  that  the 
host  plant  of  Oligobruchus  was  a  legume. 

Comparisons  of  Climate 

The  climate  in  Florissant  times  is  said  by  MacGinitie  (1953)  to  have 
been  “sub-humid  and  warm  temperate,  not  unlike  the  present  climate  of 
Monterrey,  Mexico.”  This  statement  concurred  generally  with  the  conclu¬ 
sions  of  James  (1939)  concerning  the  Florissant  Diptera. 

The  modern  representatives  of  the  Pachymerinae  are  distributed  almost 
entirely  in  subtropical  regions;  thus,  there  seems  to  be  no  discordance  in 
the  climatic  distribution  of  the  Florissant  Oligobruchus  and  that  of  the 
modern  representatives  of  the  Pachymerinae. 


Literature  Cited 

Bridwell,  J.  C.  . 

1946.  The  genera  of  beetles  of  the  family  Bruchidae  in  America  north  ot 
Mexico.  Jour.  Wash.  Acad.  Sci.  36(2):  52-57. 

James,  M.  T.  ....  . 

1939.  A  preliminary  review  of  certain  families  of  Diptera  from  the  Florissant 
Miocene  beds.  J.  Paleontol.  13(1):  42-48. 

MacGinitie,  H.  D.  ,  ^  .  r  , 

1953  Fossil  plants  of  the  Florissant  beds,  Colorado.  Carnegie  Inst.  Wash., 

Publ.  599,  198  pp. 

Wickham,  H.  F. 

1912.  A  report  on  some  recent  collections  of  fossil  Coleoptera  from  the  Miocene 
shales  of  Florissant.  Bui.  Nat.  Hist.,  State  Univ.  Iowa  4(3):  1-38,  8  pis. 

1913.  Fossil  Coleoptera  from  the  Wilson  Ranch  near  Florissant,  Colorado. 
Bui.  Nat.  Hist.,  State  Univ.  Iowa  4(4) :  1-29,  7  pis. 

1914  New  Miocene  Coleoptera  from  Florissant.  Bui.  Mus.  Comp.  Zool. 
58(11):  423-494,  16  pis. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


31 


A  HYDROPHILID  NEW  TO  NORTH  AMERICA 
(COLEOPTERA:  HYDROPHILIDAE) 

Helophorus  ( Gephelophorus )  fennicus  Paykull 

Elophorus  fennicus  Paykull,  1798,  Fauna  Suecica  1:243  [type:  Finland]. 

H  clop  horns  ( Gephelophorus )  fennicus  Gyllenhal:  d’Orchymont,  1926,  Ann.  Soc. 
Linn.  Lyon  72:115-116  [subgeneric  characters]. 

H elophorus  fennicus  Paykull:  Lindroth  et  al.,  1960,  Ent.  Siillskapet,  Lund,  1:64-67 
[European  distribution]. 

Gephelophorus  sibiricus  (Motschulsky) :  Sharp,  1915,  Ent.  Mo.  Mag.  51:198-200 
[subgeneric  characters,  distribution]. 

Additional  references  and  synonymy  in  Knisch,  1924,  Junk  Coleop.  Cat.  pars  79* 
76-77. 

This  species  is  repiesented  in  the  Canadian  National  Collection  by  seven  specimens 
taken  during  July,  1961,  by  Dr.  R.  Madge  at  Unalakleet  and  Cape  Thompson,  which 
are  situated  on  the  Alaskan  coast  at  63°54'  N.  and  68°05'  N.  Neither  the  species 
nor  its  subgenus  has  been  reported  from  North  America;  the  Alaskan  specimens 
match  specimens  from  Lapland  that  were  kindly  loaned  by  Dr.  Carl  Lindroth. 

In  Gephelophorus  Sharp  the  terminal  segment  of  each  maxillary  palpus  is  fusiform 
and  not  strongly  asymmetric.  Each  elytron  bears  a  supplementary  stria  on  the  basal 
part  of  the  second  interval.  The  cariniform  external  margin  of  each  elytron  is  ac¬ 
tually  the  median  line  of  the  eleventh  interval,  the  external  portion  of  this  interval 
being  deflected  obliquely  and  inwardly  to  form  a  shiny  pseudepipleura.  This  pseudepi- 
pleura  does  not  attain  the  sutural  angle  and  is  separated  by  a  carina  from  the  true 
epipleura,  which  is  opaque  and  which  evanesces  at  the  first  abdominal  segment.  H. 
fennicus  is  said  to  occur  from  eastern  Siberia  to  Lapland  and  south  in  the  moun¬ 
tains  to  southern  Norway.  It  measures  from  5.0  to  6.0  mm.  It  has  each  sutural  interval 
moderately  elevated  and  has  intervals  3,  5,  and  7  strongly  convex  and  moderately 
elevated  above  intervals  2,  4,  and  6,  which  are  flat. — W.  J.  Brown,  Entomology  Re¬ 
search  Institute,  Experimental  Farm,  Ottawa,  Canada. 


NOTICE 

The  Robert  E.  Snodgrass  library  of  reprints  on  insect  anatomy  and  morphology 
is  now  housed  in  the  U.  S.  National  Museum,  Department  of  Entomology,  and  is 
being  perpetuated  as  a  memorial  to  Dr.  Snodgress.  Contributors  to  the  field  of  insect 
morphology  are  invited  to  send  copies  of  their  papers  to  the  Snodgrass  Reprint  Collec¬ 
tion,  Department  of  Entomology,  U.  S.  National  Museum,  Washington,  D.  C. 


BEETLE  TALK 

The  following  proposals  concerning  the  scientific  names  of  beetles  were  placed 
before  the  International  Commission  on  Zoological  Nomenclature: 

Laemophloeus  immundus  Reitter,  1874  (Insecta,  Coleoptera):  Proposed  suppres¬ 
sion  under  the  plenary  powers.  L.  P.  Lefkovitch,  1964,  Bull.  Zool.  Nomenclature 
21(5) :  375. 

Cotinis  Burmeister,  1842  (Insecta,  Coleoptera):  Proposed  conservation  under  the 
plenary  powers.  M.  A.  Goodrich,  1964,  Bull.  Zool.  Nomenclature  21(6):429. 

Cryptorhynchus  Illiger,  1807  (Insecta,  Coleoptera):  Proposed  interpretation  under 
the  plenary  powers.  D.  G.  Kissinger,  1964,  Bull.  Zool.  Nomenclature  21(6):440. 


32 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


HYPERODES  ANTHRACINUS  (DIETZ)  DAMAGING  GOLF 
GREENS  (COLEOPTERA:  CURCULIONIDAE) 

Specimens  of  the  genus  Hyperodes  were  forwarded  to  me  by  L.  L.  Pechuman  of 
Cornell  University  who  had  received  them  from  the  Skytop  Golf  Club,  Skytop, 
Monroe  Co.,  Pennsylvania.  I  identified  the  species  as  H.  anthracinus  (Dietz).  Infor¬ 
mation  sent  with  the  specimens  stated  that  they  were  collected  in  Sept.  1962  and  were 
doing  considerable  damage  to  golf  greens  in  Pennsylvania.  In  1959  I  had  received 
and  identified  H.  anthracinus  specimens  from  the  Piping  Rock  Country  Club,  Long 
Island,  New  York.  These  also  were  reported  doing  damage  to  golf  greens.  H. 
anthracinus  is  a  Florida  species,  and,  in  addition  to  the  above,  only  two  specimens 
in  the  National  Collection  had  been  collected  outside  of  that  State.  One  was  col¬ 
lected  at  a  light  trap  on  Horn  Island,  Mississippi,  June  14,  1944,  by  E.  A.  Richmond, 
the  other  is  merely  labelled  Virginia.  Other  than  the  original  description  in  1899 
and  the  listing  of  the  species  in  Richmond  (The  Flora  and  Fauna  of  Horn  Island, 
Mississippi,  Gulf  Research  Reports,  Vol.  1,  No.  2,  p.  87,  1962)  there  is  no  literature 
available  on  the  species. — Rose  Ella  Warner,  Ent.  Res.  Div.,  A.R.S.,  U.  S. 
Department  of  Agriculture,  Washington,  D.  C. 


5  imp  ,jKv?^s 


BEETLE  TALK 

On  Canthon  laevis:  If  the  observer  carefully  seizes  the  male  and  quickly  removes 
it  to  the  collecting  vial  without  jarring  the  ball,  some  seconds  will  elapse  before  the 
“widowed  survivor”  realizes  his  absence,  she  then  ceases  propelling  the  ball  in  the 
direction  previously  taken;  mounts  it,  peers  under  it,  and  on  all  sides  of  it;  gives 
it  another  fitful  push  or  two,  and  then  re-examines  it  closely  with  eye  and  antenna, 
then  in  the  majority  of  cases  deserts  it  entirely,  on  several  occasions  moving  off  a  few 
feet  only,  pushing  her  head  beneath  a  clod  of  earth  or  other  loose  material,  remains 
perfectly  still  as  if  lost  in  hopeless  grief  for  many  minutes. — Sanborn,  1875,  Field 
and  Forest,  p.  55. 

Dr.  Schwarz  exhibited  two  specimens  of  Mylabris  cichorii  L.  and  said  this  is  a 
beneficial  species,  being  used  for  medicinal  purposes.  This  species  is  often  eaten  when 
the  Chinese  want  to  commit  suicide. — Jour.  Wash.  Acad.  Sci.  13:261,  1923. 


NOTICE 

CORRECTION:  In  the  Bulletin  1964,  18(4) :  105-1 1 1,  the  name  Neltumius 
gibbithorax  Schaeffer  was  consistently  misspelled  gibbothorax  throughout  the  paper. 
I  sincerely  regret  the  error. — John  M.  Kingsolver. 


-BACK  ISSUES 

The  Coleopterists'  Bulletin 


Per 

Single 

Volume 

Issue 

Vol.  3,  1949,  6  issues 

(Nos.  7  &  2  o.p.)  $5.00 

$1.00 

Vol.  4,  1950,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol.  5,  1951,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol.  6,  1952,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol.  7,  1953,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol.  8,  1954,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol.  9,  1955,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol.  10,  1956,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol.  11,  1957,  2  issues 

5.00 

3.00 

Vol.  12,  1958,  1  issue 

5.00 

5.00 

Vol.  13,  1959,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol.  14,  1960,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol.  15,  1961,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol.  16,  1962,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol.  17,  1963,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

(above  prices  Postpaid ) 


. ATTENTION  READERS! . 

From  time  to  time  we  receive  requests  from  our  subscribers  who 
wish  to  complete  their  holdings  of  the  Bulletin.  We  would  appre¬ 
ciate  it  if  any  readers  possessing  copies  of  Vol.  3,  No.  1,  with  which 
they  are  willing  to  part,  would  inform  the  Bulletin. 


★ 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 

620  Michigan  Avenue,  N.E. 
Washington,  D.  C.  20017 


Send  today  for  your  copy  of— 

“PYGMIES  AND  PYGMOIDS: 

TWIDES  OF  TROPICAL  AFRICA” 

BY 

Martin  Gusinde,  S.V.D. 

JANUARY  1955  ISSUE  OF 
ANTHROPOLOGICAL  QUARTERLY 

•  This  interesting  and  educational  article  is 
based  on  the  author’s  original  observations, 
and  includes  a  complete  bibliography  on  the 
“PYGMIES.” 

Price:  $1.00  Postpaid 
Anthropological  Quarterly 

620  Michigan  Avenue,  N.E.,  Washington,  D.  C.  20017 


Now  in  its  38th  year — 


Anthropological  Quarterly 

(formerly  Primitive  Man) 

Issued  January,  April,  July  and  October 

<r*o 


Some  Recent  Contents: 

Grasshoppers  as  Food  in  Buhaya . P*  O.  Mors 

A  Pygmy  Group  Newly  Discovered  in  New  Guinea.  Martin  Gusinde 


Eskimo  Reindeer  Herding . Robert  T.  Anderson 

Rock  Paintings  of  South  Africa . Abbe  Henri  Breuil 

The  Assinboin  Horse  Medicine  Cult . John  C.  Ewers 


Treatment  of  Disease  in  the  New  Guinea  Highlands 

Louis  J.  Luzbetak 


(Articles  on  Physical  and  Cultural  Anthropology) 

Subscription  Price  $4.00  a  year  Single  Issues  $1.00 

Anthropological  Quarterly 

620  Michigan  Ave.,  N.E.  Washington,  D.  C.  20017 


VOLUME  19  JUNE  (No.  2  WERHTY  OF  III  W>'.'  1965 

$t'r'  -  c  ^_^>SEP  2  7  1965 

ALLECULIDAE:  Charisius,  by  Campbell . 43 

COLLECTIONS:  Brazil,  by  Triplehorn .  57 

DISTRIBUTION:  Ottawa  District,  by  Hicks .  37 

HYDROPHILIDAE:  New  Crenitis,  by  Miller .  33 

SCARABAEIDAE:  Larvae,  by  Jerath  &  Unny .  59 


Literature  Notice .  42 

Notice  .  42 


THE  CATHOLIC  UNIVERSITY  OF  AMERICA  PRESS 
WASHINGTON/  D.C.  20017 


A  Quarterly  Publication  Devoted 
to  the  Study  of  Beetles 


M 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS’  BULLETIN 

Founded  1947  by  Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr. 

The  Coleopterists’  Bulletin  is  published  by  The  Catholic  University  of  America 
Press,  Washington,  D.  C.  20017  and  edited  by  T.  J.  Spilman.  It  is  issued  four  times  a 
year  beginning  with  March.  All  business  matters  should  be  addressed  to  The  Cole¬ 
opterists’  Bulletin  at  the  Press.  Manuscripts  and  other  editorial  matter  should  be 
addressed  to  the  editor,  U.  S.  National  Museum,  Washington,  D.  C.  20560. 


Subscriptions:  The  subscription  price  for 
each  annual  volume  of  four  numbers  is 
$5.00  payable  in  advance.  All  sub¬ 
scriptions  begin  with  the  first  issue  of 
the  year  and  those  subscribing  later  in 
the  year  will  receive  the  back  issues  of 
the  volume. 


Back  volumes:  A  stock  of  back  volumes 
is  maintained  and  may  be  purchased  as 
follows:  3  to  date,  $5.00  ea.;  single  num¬ 
bers,  $1.25  each;  all  prices  postpaid. 
Missing  numbers:  Issues  lost  in  the  mail 
will  be  supplied  free  of  charge  if  notified 
within  three  months  after  mailing. 


EDITORIAL  BOARD 


Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr.,  Ph.D. 

Department  of  Biology 
Catholic  University  of  America 

O.  L.  Cartwright 

U.  S.  National  Museum 
Washington,  D.  C.  20560 

Eugene  J.  Gerberg,  Ph.D. 

Insect  Control  and  Research,  Inc. 
Baltimore,  Md. 


James  A.  Magner,  Ph.D.,  S.T.D. 

Business  Manager  of  the  Bulletin 
Catholic  University  of  America 

Theodore  J.  Spilman 

U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture 
Washington,  D.  C.  20560 

Eileen  R.  Van  Tassell 

Department  of  Biology 
Catholic  University  of  America 


NOTICE  TO  AUTHORS 


Manuscripts  will  be  considered  ONLY 
FROM  SUBSCRIBERS.  Authors  should 
consult  STYLE  MANUAL  FOR  BIO¬ 
LOGICAL  JOURNALS,  prepared  by  the 
Committee  on  Form  and  Style  of  the  Con¬ 
ference  of  Biological  Editors,  and  pub¬ 
lished  by  the  American  Institute  of  Bio¬ 
logical  Sciences,  2000  P  St.,  N.W.,  Wash¬ 
ington,  D.  C.  20006.  The  Bulletin  requires 
that  all  manuscripts  be  prepared  according 
to  instructions  in  the  Style  Manual.  Illus¬ 
trations  should  be  sent  mounted,  and 
numbered.  The  manuscript  should  be 
marked  to  indicate  the  location  of  text 
figures  or  the  position  of  full  page  plates. 

Manuscripts  will  be  acknowledged  upon 
receipt.  As  soon  as  possible  thereafter  the 
author  will  be  notified  as  to  acceptance 
after  review  by  the  Editorial  Board.  If 
the  manuscript  is  accepted,  a  tentative 
date  of  publication  will  be  set.  In  general, 


all  papers  will  be  published  in  their  order 
of  receipt,  but  the  editor  reserves  the  right 
to  use  articles  out  of  order  in  the  interest 
of  a  balanced  magazine. 

The  editor  will  make  no  text  changes 
without  advanced  notice  to  the  author. 
Galley  proof  will  be  sent  for  correction. 
These  galleys  are  sent  out  well  in  advance 
and  do  NOT  indicate  the  date  or  order  of 
publication. 

Twenty-five  tear  sheets  of  one  page 
notes  will  be  supplied  free  to  the  author  if 
requested  when  returning  galley  proofs. 
Reprints  of  articles  printed  free  of  extrane¬ 
ous  matter  will  be  supplied  with  or  with¬ 
out  covers  at  cost.  Reprints  MUST  be 
ordered  on  the  form  provided  when  re¬ 
turning  galley  proofs.  The  approximate 
cost  of  reprints  will  be  supplied  with  this 
form. 


EDITORIAL  POLICY 

Any  article,  note,  or  news  items  likely  cases ,  descriptions  of  new  species  must  be 
to  be  of  interest  to  readers  of  the  Bulletin  illustrated.  Descriptions  of  new  species  or 
will  be  considered.  Articles  with  illustra-  genera  MUST  contain  keys  or  be  corre- 
tions  are  particularly  desired,  and  in  all  lated  with  existing  keys. 


A  QUARTERLY  PUBLICATION  DEVOTED  TO  THE  STUDY  OF  BEETLES 

The  Coleopterists’  Bulletin 

Volume  19  June  (No.  2)  1965 


THREE  NEW  SPECIES  OF  CRENITIS  FROM 
THE  PACIFIC  NORTHWEST 
(COLEOPTERA:  HYDROPHILIDAE) 

By  David  C.  Miller1-  2 

Three  new  species  of  the  genus  Crenitis  are  described  here  in  order  to 
make  the  names  available  for  use  in  the  section  on  Hydrophilidae  in  the 
forthcoming  Part  V  of  Dr.  M.  H.  Hatch’s  Beetles  of  the  Pacific  Northwest. 

Thanks  are  due  to  the  following  individuals  for  the  loan  of  material  of 
these  new  species  for  study.  The  abbreviations  in  parentheses  are  those 
used  after  the  locality  listings  to  indicate  the  site  of  deposition  of  the 
material.  This  is  generally  equivalent  to  the  original  source  from  which 
it  was  borrowed.  The  author’s  collection  is  referred  to  as  (DM).  Mr.  Hugh 
B.  Leech,  California  Academy  of  Sciences  (CAS);  Mr.  W.  J.  Brown, 
Canadian  National  Collection,  Ottawa  (CNC);  Mr.  H.  S.  Dybas,  Chicago 
Natural  History  Museum  (CNHM) ;  Mr.  Ken  M.  Fender,  McMinnville, 
Oregon  (KF);  Mr.  Jack  Lattin,  Oregon  State  University,  Corvallis  (OSU); 
Mr.  S.  G.  Jewett,  Portland,  Oregon  (SGJ);  Dr.  M.  H.  Hatch,  University 
of  Washington  (UW). 

Mr.  Leech  has  been  most  kind  in  reading  a  preliminary  version  of  the 
manuscript  and  sending  additional  material  for  study,  including  the  only 
known  females  of  C.  palpalis  n.  sp.  Dr.  Hatch  aided  in  many  ways  with 
the  portions  of  the  work  completed  while  I  was  at  the  University  of  Wash¬ 
ington.  The  drawings  are  by  Mrs.  Helen  Houk  of  the  University  of  Wash¬ 
ington  (fig.  1,  2)  and  Mr.  David  Simon  of  the  City  College  of  New  York 
(fig.  3). 

The  Genus  Crenitis 

The  genus  Crenitis  Bedel  may  be  defined  as  Hydrobiinae  which  are 
under  4  mm.  long,  with  the  maxillary  palpi  subequal  to  the  antennae  in 
length,  no  deep  elytral  striae  except  for  the  sutural  ones,  and  the  mesoster- 
num  with  neither  a  longitudinal  carina  nor  a  conical  tooth.  In  morata 
(Horn),  digestus  (LeC.),  rufiventris  (Horn)  and  seriellus  (Fall),  not 
included  in  the  genus  by  all  authors,  the  mesosternum  has  a  low  transverse 
ridge  in  front  of  a  small  transverse  indentation,  but  in  most  species  it  is 
entirely  plain. 


1  Department  of  Biology,  City  College  of  New  York,  N.  Y.  10031. 

2  The  majority  of  this  work  was  included  in  a  dissertation  submitted  to  the  Uni¬ 
versity  of  Washington  in  partial  fulfillment  of  the  requirements  for  the  degree  of 
Doctor  of  Philosophy. 


34 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


The  three  tiny  species  described  here  are  obviously  closely  related,  and 
additional  small  species  from  California  which  are  as  yet  undescribed 
probably  also  belong  to  this  group.  In  all  three  species  the  sexes  may  be 
separated  by  the  shape  of  the  tarsal  claws,  which  in  the  female  curve 
gradually  from  base  to  tip,  while  in  the  male  they  are  angled  sharply  just 
after  the  base  and  then  straight  to  the  tip.  Thanks  are  due  to  Mr.  Hugh 
Leech  for  pointing  out  this  distinction  to  me. 

If  the  color  pattern  of  the  pronotum  is  somewhat  loosely  interpreted, 
all  three  new  species  will  run  to  couplet  3  in  Leech’s  key  to  the  California 
Crenitis  (Leech  and  Chandler  1956:344)  as  they  have  the  pronotum  dark 
brown  or  reddish  brown  with  pale  lateral  margins.  The  following  key 

separates  the  new  species  and  those  found  in  Leech’s  couplet  3. 

• 

3.  Metafemora  nearly  glabrous;  antennae  9-segmented;  pronotum  at  most  very  faintly 
alutaceous  between  the  punctures;  mentum  about  1.2  times  as  wide  as  long; 
maxillary  palpi  with  the  pseudobasal  segment  much  enlarged;  California  to  Oregon 

_ DISSIMILIS  (Horn) 

Metafemora  pubescent  in  basal  2/3  or  more;  mentum  about  1.5  times  as  wide  as 

long;  maxillary  palpi  with  the  pseudobasal  segment  at  most  slightly  enlarged -  5 

5.  Pronotum  alutaceous  between  the  punctures,  especially  at  the  sides;  antennae  8-seg- 

mented;  length  2. 2-3. 3  mm.;  Arizona,  California  to  British  Columbia - ALTICOLA  (Fall) 

Pronotum  smooth  between  the  punctures;  antennae  9-segmented;  length  under  2.6  mm.  6 

6.  Elytra  with  the  pale  lateral  margin  blending  into  a  diffusely  paler  area  at  the  apex; 

metatibiae,  at  broadest  point,  at  least  Va  as  broad  as  long;  maxillary  palpi  with 
apical  segment  glabrous,  about  twice  length  of  adjacent  segment;  aedeagus  with 

parameres  bluntly  rounded  at  tips - SNOQUALMIE  n.  sp. 

Elytra  with  pale  lateral  margin  sharply  defined  (or  occasionally  absent),  elytral  apex 

not  diffusely  paler -  7 

7.  Apical  segment  of  maxillary  palpi  glabrous,  about  twice  length  of  adjacent  segment; 

metatibiae,  at  broadest  point,  about  Va  as  broad  as  long;  aedeagus  with  parameres 

bulging  laterally  and  drawn  out  at  tips  along  inner  margins - MALKINI  n.  sp. 

Apical  segment  of  maxillary  palpi  of  males  strongly  pubescent  except  along  anterior 
margin,  that  of  females  bearing  only  a  few  scattered  hairs,  but  that  of  both  sexes 
about  three  times  length  of  adjacent  segment;  metatibiae,  at  broadest  point,  about 
Va  as  broad  as  long;  aedeagus  with  parameres  bluntly  rounded  at  tips — PALPALIS  n.  sp. 


Figures  1-3,  Crenitis  spp.  1.  C.  pcilpaiis,  terminal  segments  of  maxillary  palpus. 
2.  C.  snoqualmie,  aedeagus,  dorsal  view.  3.  C.  malkini,  aedeagus,  dorsal  view  (speci¬ 
men  from  British  Columbia). 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


35 


Crenitis  snoqualmie  Miller,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Fig.  2) 

Crenitis  dissimilis  snoqualmie  Hatch  and  Kincaid  1958:11.  NOMEN 
NUDUM. 

MALE:  Length  1.9-2. 5  mm.;  form  elongate  oval,  nearly  parallel  sided;  head  black; 
pronotum  dark  brown,  with  side  margins  narrowly  pale,  more  broadly  so  posteriorly; 
elytra  and  scutellum  dark  brown,  with  narrow  lateral  margins  of  elytra  pale,  blend¬ 
ing  into  diffusely  pale  area  at  apex;  punctation  of  head,  pronotum,  and  elytra  all 
thick  and  fairly  strong,  subserially  arranged  on  elytra  and  impressed  as  very  light 
striae  near  elytral  apex  and  sides;  venter  very  dark  brown;  mesosternum  unmodified 
(i.e.  with  no  transverse  ridge  or  indentation);  legs  dark  brown,  with  femoral  apices, 
tibiae,  and  tarsi  paler;  metatibiae  at  broadest  point  at  least  1/6  as  broad  as  long; 
femora  pubescent  except  at  about  apical  quarter;  maxillary  palpi  pale,  except  apicai 
segment  very  dark,  all  segments  glabrous;  antennae  dark,  9-segmented;  mentum 
rectangular,  about  half  again  as  wide  as  long;  abdomen  dull,  finely  and  densely 
pubescent;  aedeagus  with  parameres  broad,  short,  and  blunt  (nearly  truncate)  at  tips. 

FEMALE:  Externally  identical  to  the  male  except  for  the  difference  in  tarsal 
claws  noted  above. 

HOLOTYPE:  Male,  Green  River  Gorge,  King  Co.,  Washington,  July 
20,  1939,  G.  Minsk  (UW).  ALLOTYPE:  Female,  same  data  as  holotype 
but  Aug.  6,  1937,  M.  H.  Hatch  (UW).  PARATYPES:  BRITISH  CO¬ 
LUMBIA:  1,  Copper  Mountain  (CNC).  WASHINGTON:  Clallam  Co.: 
19,  Olympic  Hot  Springs  (Olympic  National  Park)  (UW).  Clark  Co.:  7, 
Skye  (UW).  Cowlitz  Co.:  10,  Morgan  State  Park  (Toutle  River)  (7  SGJ, 
2  UW,  1  DM).  King  Co.:  22,  Green  River  Gorge  (UW);  1,  North  Bend 
(CAS);  2,  Snoqualmie  (UW);  2,  Snoqualmie  Falls  (UW);  7,  Snoqualmie 
River  (Maloney’s  Grove)  (UW);  1,  Tokul  (UW).  Lewis  Co.:  3,  Vance 
(UW).  Mason  Co.:  6,  Shelton  (UW);  2,  South  Fork  Skokomish  River 
(UW).  Pacific  Co.:  3,  Naselle  River  (UW);  2,  North  Nemah  River  (UW); 
2,  Ocean  Park  (UW).  Pierce  Co.:  1,  Chop  River  (UW);  4,  Fairfax  (Car¬ 
bon  River  )  (UW).  Olympic  Peninsula  {County?):  1,  Finch  Creek  (UW). 
OREGON:  Coos  Co.:  3,  Cape  Arago  (KMF).  Curry  Co.:  2,  Pistol  River 
(Myers  Creek)  (CAS).  Douglas  Co.:  1,  Elkton  (SGJ).  Lane  Co.:  3,  Austa 
(1  SGJ,  1  UW,  1  DM);  11,  McKenzie  River  (UW);  10,  tributary  Turner 
Creek  (6  SGJ,  2  UW,  2  DM).  Lincoln  Co.:  9,  Butler  City  (7  SGJ,  1  UW, 

1  DM).  Marion  Co.:  13,  Detroit  (Elk  Creek  Road)  (9  SGJ,  2  UW,  2 
DM);  22,  Breitenbush  (18  SGJ,  2  UW,  2  DM).  Yamhill  Co.:  1,  Dayton 
(UW);  12,  McMinnville  (1  Peavine  Ridge)  (UW). 

The  single  specimen  from  Copper  Mountain,  British  Columbia,  is  perhaps 
mislabeled,  and  should  not  be  accepted  in  the  distribution  range  of  the 
species  until  additional  material  from  that  area  is  found.  Within  the  Pacific 
Northwest  the  species  occurs  only  west  of  the  Cascade  Mountains,  from 
Washington  through  Oregon,  but  the  southern  limit  of  distribution  is  not 
known. 

Crenitis  malkini  Miller,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Fig.  3) 

MALE:  Identical  to  C.  snoqualmie  Miller,  n.  sp.,  except  for  the  following:  elytra 
usually  with  a  very  narrow  pale  margin  laterally,  but  not  diffusely  paler  at  the  apex; 
aedeagus  with  the  parameres  bulging  laterally  and  drawn  out  at  the  tips  along  their 
inner  margins. 


36 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


FEMALE:  Externally  identical  to  the  male  except  for  the  difference  in  tarsal 
claws  noted  above. 

HOLOTYPE:  Male,  Port  Orford,  Curry  Co.,  Oregon,  July  7,  1951, 
Borys  Malkin  (UW).  ALLOTYPE:  Female,  same  data  as  holotype  (UW). 
PARATYPES:  IDAHO :  Blane  Co.:  3$  3,1?,  Galena  (2  UW,  1  CNHM, 

1  DM).  Custer  Co.:  12,  Twin  Creek  Forest  Camp  (Challis  National 
Forest)  (UW).  BRITISH  COLUMBIA:  3$  2,  4  2  2,  Elk  River 
(Hosmer)  (5  CAS,  2  DM).  OREGON:  Coos  Co.:  1  2,  Bridge  (OSU). 
Curry  Co.:  1  2  ,  1  2  ,  Port  Orford  (  2  UW,  2  CNHM). 

I  take  great  pleasure  in  naming  this  species  in  honor  of  Mr.  Borys 
Malkin,  who  collected  most  of  the  known  specimens  and  who  has  added 
greatly  to  our  knowledge  of  the  northwestern  Hydrophilidae  by  his  exten¬ 
sive  collections  in  Idaho  and  Oregon.  The  lack  of  records  of  this  species  in 
Washington  probably  is  simply  due  to  lack  of  collecting,  but  it  is  possible 
that  there  are  two  species  represented  in  this  material.  The  aedeagus  of 
the  males  from  the  British  Columbia  locality  is  slightly  broader  and  more 
rounded  than  that  of  the  males  from  Oregon  and  Idaho.  The  illustration 
(fig.  3)  shows  the  aedeagus  of  a  male  from  British  Columbia. 

Crenitis  palpalis  Miller,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Fig.  1) 

MALE:  Length  1.9-2. 3  mm.;  identical  to  C.  si loqualmie  Miller,  n.  sp.,  in  all  respects 
including  the  aedeagus,  except  for  the  following:  dorsal  color  dark  reddish  brown 
with  base  of  head  darker  than  pronotum  and  elytra,  pronotum  and  elytra  both  with 
sharply  defined  narrow  pale  margins,  but  elytra  not  diffusely  paler  at  apex;  terminal 
segment  of  maxillary  palpus  much  enlarged  (more  than  three  times  length  of  previous 
segment)  and  strongly  pubescent  except  along  anterior  margin;  metatibiae,  at  broad-  , 
est  point,  about  Vs  as  broad  as  long. 

FEMALE:  Externally  identical  to  the  male  except  for  the  following:  tarsal  claws 
differing  as  noted  above;  maxillary  palpi  with  terminal  segment  dark  reddish  brown, 
slightly  less  than  three  times  as  long  as  preceding  segment,  and  nearly  glabrous, 
bearing  only  a  few  scattered  hairs. 

HOLOTYPE:  Male,  Shasta  Retreat,  Siskiyou  Co.,  California.  Elev. 
2416'.  July.  F.  E.  Blaisdell  (CAS).  ALLOTYPE:  Female,  same  data  as 
holotype  (CAS).  PARATYPES:  CALIFORNIA:  Siskiyou  Co.:  2  2  2  , 

1  2,  Shasta  Retreat  (1  CAS,  2  DM).  OREGON:  Curry  Co.:  1 2,  nr. 
mouth  Rogue  River  (SGJ). 

Literature  Cited 

Hatch,  M.  H.,  and  T.  Kincaid 

1958.  A  list  of  the  Coleoptera  from  the  vicinity  of  Willipa  Bay,  Washington. 
Calliostoma  Co.,  Seattle.  21  pp. 

Leech,  H.  B.,  and  H.  P.  Chandler 

1956.  Aquatic  Coleoptera,  pp.  293-371.  In  Usinger  (Ed.),  Aquatic  Insects  of 
California  with  Keys  to  North  American  Genera  and  California  Species. 
U.  of  California  Press,  Berkeley  and  Los  Angeles,  ix  &  508  pp. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


37 


THE  NORTHERN  LIMITS  OF  SEVERAL  SPECIES  OF 
COLEOPTERA  WITH  SPECIAL  REFERENCE  TO  THEIR 
OCCURRENCE  IN  THE  OTTAWA  DISTRICT,  ONTARIO 

By  Stanton  D.  Hicks1 

Many  insects  and  plants  that  occur  in  southern  Ontario  are  not  found 
in  the  Ottawa  District,  an  area  embraced  by  a  circle  of  thirty-mile  radius 
centered  at  the  Parliament  Buildings  in  Ottawa  (fig.  1).  Munroe  (1956, 
p.  400)  specifically  states,  “More  than  thirty  species  of  trees  occur  in  the 
Niagara  Peninsula  that  do  not  occur  at  Ottawa,  and  a  similar  contrast 
extends  throughout  the  fauna  and  flora.”  The  Ottawa  District  as  depicted 
in  the  accompanying  map  is  in  the  hemlock-white  pine-northern  hardwoods 
region,  equivalent  to  the  Great  Lakes-St.  Lawrence  region  plus  the  Acadian 
region  of  Halliday,  all  of  which  is  a  tremendous  tract  extending  from 
southeastern  Manitoba  to  the  Atlantic  coast.  During  the  years  1948  to 
1961,  while  assisting  in  the  maintenance  of  the  Canadian  National  Collec¬ 
tion  and  collecting  insects  in  the  Ottawa  area,  I  noted  that  several  species 
ot  beetles,  which  I  had  collected  in  southern  Ontario,  were  relatively 
uncommon  here.  Records  of  such  species  form  the  subject  of  the  present 
paper.  A  number  of  interesting  species  found  near  Constance  Bay  have 
been  excluded  because  the  unusual  faunal  characteristics  of  this  area  have 
not  been  adequately  studied.  The  localities  referred  to  are  underlined  in 
the  map. 

Cicindela  punctulata  Olivier  (Cicindelidae).  This  is  one  of  the  most 
widely  distributed  tiger  beetles  in  the  United  States.  It  can  be  easily  col¬ 
lected  in  southern  Ontario,  and  according  to  Wallis  (1961,  p.  61)  it 
ranges  northeast  through  London,  Guelph,  Toronto,  Kettleby,  and  Leskard 
to  eastern  Ontario.  It  has  been  taken  in  small  numbers  at  Marmora  and 
recently  was  collected  for  the  first  time  in  the  Ottawa  District  near  Bells 
Corners  and  in  Ottawa  at  Britannia  Heights.  The  species  appears  to  be 
restricted  to  these  two  District  areas  on  open,  sandy  soil.  The  northernmost 

record  is  by  Hubbard  and  Schwarz  (1878,  p.  627)  in  the  Lake  Superior 
region. 

In  1964  the  author  collected  fourteen  specimens  of  C.  punctulata  at 
Beechgrove,  near  Quyon,  Quebec.  This  appears  to  be  the  first  authentic 
record  for  Quebec;  previously,  Beaulieu  (1900,  p.  140)  and  Beaulne 
(1914,  p.  123)  listed  the  species  without  locality  records. 

The  seemingly  disjunct  distribution  of  this  beetle  in  Canada  as  recorded 
by  Wallis  starts  again  in  southern  Manitoba  at  Aweme,  Hartney,  and 
Treesbank,  continues  to  Estevan  in  Saskatchewan,  and  Medicine  Hat, 
Burdette,  Lethbridge,  and  Happy  Valley  in  Alberta. 

Zonitis  bilineata  Say  (Meloidae).  In  the  United  States,  this  meloid 
ranges  in  the  East  from  South  Carolina  and  Kansas  northward  to  Con¬ 
necticut  and  Minnesota.  It  seems  to  be  a  rarity  in  Canada,  although  perhaps 
it  has  been  overlooked,  since  the  specimens  in  the  National  ^Collection 

1  Entomology  Research  Institute,  Research  Branch,  Canada  Department  of  Agri¬ 
culture,  Ottawa,  Ontario. 


38 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


show  that  it  has  been  found  only  from  July  7  to  July  18.  At  Windsor, 
Ontario,  a  few  specimens  were  collected  on  the  flower  heads  of  thistle, 
Cirsium  sp.,  and  one  specimen  has  been  taken  at  Marmora.  In  the  Ottawa 
District  only  three  specimens  are  known,  from  Britannia  Bay  in  Ottawa 
and  Bells  Corners. 

Agrilus  celti  Knull  and  A.  lecontei  Saunders  (Buprestidae) .  These  small 
buprestids  have  a  broad  range  in  the  United  States  wherever  their  hack- 
berry  host,  Celtis  occidentalis  L.,  occurs.  In  the  Canadian  National  Collec¬ 
tion  there  is  a  series  of  each  species  from  the  numerous  hackberry  trees  in 
the  Point  Pelee  area  of  southern  Ontario.  The  only  other  Ontario  record 
was  a  series  of  each  species  collected  by  the  author  in  a  large  hackberry 
grove  at  Carleton  Place  in  the  Ottawa  District,  some  four  hundred  miles 
to  the  northeast  (Hicks,  1960). 

It  is  very  possible  that  the  hackberry  tree  is  native  to  Canada  only  at 
Point  Pelee  and  other  Carolinian  zone  sites  along  the  shore  of  Lake  Erie. 
However,  it  has  been  recorded  sparingly  at  scattered  localities  from  London 
in  the  southwest  to  the  Ottawa  Valley  area,  and  Montreal,  the  northern¬ 
most  station.  Every  one  of  these  localities  is  on  or  near  water  routes 
formerly  used  by  Indians  who  had  the  habit  of  eating  the  hackberry  nuts 
as  they  travelled.  How  these  two  species  of  beetles  came  to  exist  on  the 
hackberry  at  Carleton  Place  with  no  records  from  the  south  for  hundreds 
of  miles  is  not  known. 

Phyllophaga  futilis  (LeConte)  (Scarabaeidae) .  This  species  was  orig¬ 
inally  described  (Agassiz,  1850,  p.  226)  from  the  Lake  Superior  region, 
the  most  northern  recorded  locality.  It  has  been  recorded  in  all  parts  of 
the  eastern  United  States  and  at  many  points  in  the  southern  parts  of 
Ontario  (Brown,  1929  and  Luginbill,  1953).  In  the  Ottawa  District,  P. 
futilis  is  unquestionably  a  common  species  but  it  was  not  recorded  here 
prior  to  1959.  Since  then,  many  specimens  have  been  collected  in  or  near 
the  city  of  Ottawa  and  south  of  it  at  numerous  locations  both  in  and 
outside  the  District.  This  scarab  has  not  been  recorded  due  west  or  east 
of  Ottawa  in  Ontario  and  it  is  not  known  across  the  Ottawa  River  to  the 
north  or  anywhere  in  the  province  of  Quebec. 

Macrodactylus  subspinosus  (Fabricius)  (Scarabaeidae).  The  rose  chafer 
is  known  to  range  from  Colorado,  Indiana,  Virginia,  and  the  Atlantic  States 
into  southern  Ontario.  It  has  been  an  economic  pest  for  many  years  from 
Windsor  to  the  Niagara  River.  Farther  north  and  east,  it  has  been  collected 
at  Oakville,  Toronto,  Belleville,  Brockville,  and  occasionally  near  the  limit 
of  the  Ottawa  District  on  the  south  side  at  Elgin  and  Chesterville,  and  on 
the  east  side  at  Plantagenet.  Recent  observations  show  that  the  species  is 
well  established  in  the  District.  In  1963,  hundreds  of  adults  were  observed 
on  the  flowers  of  Spiraea  sp.  at  Mer  Bleue,  a  large,  cold,  bog  area.  At  Kempt- 
ville,  larvae  were  common  in  soil.  Adults  have  also  been  collected  at 
Britannia  Heights  in  Ottawa,  Vernon,  and  Bourget. 

The  most  northerly  record  is  that  of  a  single  specimen  collected  by 
Beaulieu  (1903,  p.  38)  at  Yamachiche  on  the  north  shore  of  the  St. 
Lawrence  River  in  Quebec.  The  rose  chafer  has  been  reported  from  several 
localities  in  southern  Quebec  but  apparently  not  in  abundance. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


39 


Pelidnota  punctata  (Linnaeus)  (Scarabaeidae) .  This  beetle  is  widespread 
in  the  eastern  half  of  the  United  States  as  indicated  by  specimens  in  the 
C  anadian  National  Collection  from  Texas,  Oklahoma,  Missouri,  Tennessee, 
Kentucky,  and  Massachusetts.  In  Ontario,  according  to  the  records  of  the 
Canadian  Insect  Pest  Review,  this  species  was  reported  as  early  as  1871; 
since  then  it  has  been  recorded  from  near  Lake  St.  Clair  east  to  London’ 
the  Niagara  Peninsula,  Toronto,  Port  Hope,  Courtice,  Kingston,  Marmora, 
and  Newboro.  It  was  first  recorded  in  the  Ottawa  District  in  1946  at  West- 
boro,  now  part  of  the  city  of  Ottawa;  more  recently  it  has  been  found 
infrequently  at  several  other  sites  in  the  city  and  at  Winchester,  Osgoode, 
and  Richmond.  The  most  recent  records  are  at  Kerr  Lake  near  Lanark’ 
and  L'Original,  just  outside  the  District.  This  insect  is  a  pest  of  cultivated 
grapes  in  southern  Ontario.  In  the  Ottawa  region  where  cultivated  grapes 
are  scarce  it  probably  feeds  on  Virginia  creeper  and  wild  grape. 

The  first  records  (Robert,  1946)  for  Quebec  were  at  Rigaud  in  1945 
and  Montreal  in  1946.  The  only  others  (Robert,  1962)  were  at  Saint-Jean 
and  Terrebonne  in  1961,  the  latter  being  the  most  northern  anywhere. 

Euphoria  inda  (Linnaeus)  (Scarabaeidae).  The  bumble  flower  beetle  is 
widely  distributed  in  the  United  States  from  Florida  and  Texas  northward. 
It  is  common  in  southern  Ontario  and  ranges  northeast  through  the  areas 
around  Toronto,  Belleville,  Muskoka,  and  Arnprior  to  Ottawa.  Only  three 
separate  records  during  the  last  twenty  years  have  been  taken  in  or  near 
Ottawa,  indicating  that  the  species  is  rare  in  the  District.  Beaulieu  (1903, 
pp.  110-111)  noted  that  this  beetle  was  common  at  Montreal,  Quebec,  and 
it  has  been  recorded  from  nearby  localities  south  of  Montreal.  It  has  also 
been  recorded  at  Norway  Bay,  Quebec,  just  outside  the  District.  In  the 
Canadian  West,  the  species  has  been  reported  from  Elgin,  Brandon,  Winni¬ 
peg,  and  Cartwright  in  Manitoba,  and  Aden,  Schuler,  and  Medicine  Hat 
in  Alberta. 

Desmocerus  palliatus  (Forster)  (Cerambycidae) .  The  cloaked  knotty- 
horn  ranges  from  Louisiana  and  North  Carolina  in  the  United  States  up 
into  southern  Ontario.  It  occurs  commonly  in  the  Niagara  Peninsula;  north¬ 
east  of  here  it  has  been  recorded  from  Toronto,  Peterborough,  Marmora, 
Lyn,  and  into  the  Ottawa  District.  Here  it  is  not  common  but  has  been 
reported  at  Manotick,  Britannia  Bay  in  Ottawa,  and  Ottawa.  Gosse  (1840, 
p.  225)  stated  that  this  beetle  was  not  uncommon  at  Compton,  Quebec, 
and  other  records  from  Montreal  (Chagnon,  1905,  p.  28),  Sweetsburg, 
Knowlton,  and  St.  Chrystostome  show  that  it  is  known  from  southern 
Quebec.  There  are  two,  isolated  records  given  in  the  Canadian  Insect  Pest 
Review,  one  at  Sillery,  just  south  of  Quebec  City  on  the  north  shore  of  the 
St.  Lawrence,  and  the  other  at  St.  Johns,  Newfoundland. 

A noplitis  philemon  (Newman)  (Chrysomelidae).  North  American  speci¬ 
mens  of  this  leaf-mining  chrysomelid  were  identified  by  Gilbert  Arrow  of 
the  British  Museum  in  1945  (H.  R.  Dodge  in  lift.).  The  species  is  not  well 
known  and  there  is  little  in  the  literature  to  resolve  a  geographical  picture 
of  its  distribution. 

In  the  Niagara  Peninsula  of  southern  Ontario,  this  leaf-miner  attracted 
my  attention  when  I  found  a  population  at  De  Cew  Falls  (five  miles  south 


40 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


of  St.  Catharines)  infesting  leaves  of  wood  nettle,  Laportea  canadensis 
(L.)  Wedd.  Several  years’  observations  showed  that  most  of  the  adults 
in  this  population  were  blackish  but  there  were  a  few  noticeable  pale 
forms.  Color  variation  also  occurred  among  the  larvae  and  pupae.  Dodge 
(1942,  in  lift.)  had  also  seen  color  differences  and  noted  especially  the 
very  marked  difference  in  the  proportion  of  the  two  colors  between  popu¬ 
lations  observed  at  Clintonville,  Wisconsin,  and  Carlisle,  Pennsylvania; 
according  to  him  it  was  the  opinion  of  H.  S.  Barber  of  the  National  Museum, 
Washington,  D.  C.,  that  the  pale  form  was  an  allelic  and  that  no  name 
should  be  assigned  to  it. 


Figure  1,  Map  of  the  Ottawa  District. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


41 


In  the  Ottawa  District,  this  beetle  was  recently  discovered  in  a  small 
woods  in  Britannia  Heights  in  Ottawa  and  across  the  Ottawa  River  at 
Fairy  Lake  near  Hull,  Quebec.  It  was  of  interest  to  find  that  the  series 
of  adults  collected  in  each  place  were  all  blackish.  Although  the  host  of 
this  species  has  a  more  or  less  continuous  distribution  from  De  Cew  Falls 
to  the  Ottawa  District,  the  writer  knows  of  no  specimens  collected  between 
these  two  widely  separated  localities.  These  records  are  slightly  more 
northern  than  those  at  Clintonville,  Wisconsin. 

Another  Anoplitis  sp.  that  is  poorly  known  in  the  United  States  (H.  R. 
Dodge  in  lift.)  and  Canada  mined  the  leaves  of  climbing  bittersweet, 
Celastrus  scandens  L.,  in  southern  Ontario  where  populations  were  observed 
for  several  years  at  Windsor,  De  Cew  Falls,  and  Niagara-on-the-Lake.  The 
host  is  common  to  the  northeast  into  the  Ottawa  District  but  the  distribu¬ 
tion  of  the  insect  appears  to  be  limited.  The  author  was  never  able  to 
find  adults  of  this  species  in  the  District  but  four  dead  pupae,  one  in  each 
of  four  mined  leaves,  were  found  at  Britannia  Bay  in  Ottawa. 

Rhodobaenus  tredecimpunctatus  (Ill.).  This  species  and  its  varieties, 
known  as  the  cocklebur  billbugs,  occur  throughout  the  United  States  where 
they  feed  mostly  on  species  of  Compositae.  In  Ontario,  the  species  has  only 
been  found  in  Ottawa  District  localities;  a  few  specimens  were  collected 
from  the  purplish  flower  heads  of  a  Joe-Pye-Weed,  Eupatorium  sp.,  at 
Britannia  Bay  in  Ottawa  and  a  few  near  Uplands  Airport,  Ottawa.’  In 
Quebec,  one  specimen  was  taken  at  Berthierville,  the  northern  recorded 
locality  for  the  species. 

Literature  Cited 

Agassiz,  L. 

1850.  Lake  Superior:  its  physical  character,  vegetation  and  animals,  compared 
with  those  of  other  and  similar  regions.  Gould,  Kendall,  and  Lincoln 
Boston.  428  pp. 

Beaulieu,  G. 

1900.  Les  Cicindeles  de  la  Province  de  Quebec.  Nat.  Canad.  27:136-140. 

1903.  Les  Scarabeides  de  la  Province  de  Quebec.  Nat.  Canad.  30:38-42. 
Beaulne,  J. 

1914.  Les  Coleopteres  du  Canada.  Nat.  Canad.  40: 122-123. 

Brown,  W.  J. 

1929.  Ann.  Rpt.  Ent.  Soc.  Ont.  59:119. 

Chagnon,  G. 

1905.  Longicornes  de  la  Province  de  Quebec.  Nat.  Canad.  32:25-29. 

Gosse,  P.  H. 

1840.  The  Canadian  Naturalist.  John  Van  Voorst,  London.  372  pp. 

Hicks,  S.  D. 

1960.  Entomological  interest  in  a  rare  grove  of  hackberry  at  Carleton  Place, 
Ontario.  Canad.  Field  Nat.  74: 174-175. 

Hubbard,  H.  G.,  and  E.  A.  Schwarz. 

1878.  List  of  Coleoptera  found  in  the  Lake  Superior  Region.  Proc.  Amer  Phil 
Soc.  17:627-666. 

Luginbill,  P.,  Sr.,  and  H.  R.  Painter. 

1953.  May  Beetles  of  the  United  States  and  Canada.  U.  S.  Dept.  Agri.  Tech 
Bull.  1060,  102  pp. 

Munroe,  E.  G. 

1956.  Canada  as  an  environment  for  insect  life.  Canad.  Ent.  88:372-476, 


42 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


Robert 

1946.  Recente  decouverte  du  Pelidnota  punctata  dans  la  Province  de  Quebec. 
Rapp.  Soc.  Quebec  Prot.  PI.  30:189-191. 

1962.  Acclimatation  de  certains  insectes  au  climat  du  Quebec.  Ann.  Soc.  Ent. 
Quebec  7:93-95. 

Wallis,  J.  B. 

1961.  The  Cicindelidae  of  Canada.  Univ.  Toronto  Press,  Toronto.  74  pp. 


LITERATURE  NOTICE 


A  REVIEW  OF  THE  CLASSIFICATION  OF  CLEROIDEA  (COLEOPTERAL 
WITH  DESCRIPTIONS  OF  TWO  NEW  GENERA  OF  PELTIDAE  AND  OF 
SEVERAL  NEW  LARVAL  TYPES.  By  R.  A.  Crowson.  Trans.  Ent  Soc.  London 
116612): 275-327,  80  figs.,  1  pi.  1964. — Crowson’s  1955  (Natural  Classification  of  the 
Families  of  Coleoptera)  treatment  of  the  Cleroidea  is  considerably  revised  and 
explained.  After  discussing  relationships  of  and  within  the  superfamily,  a  key  to 
families  (7)  of  adults  and  larvae  is  given.  Then,  he  presents  the  following  keys: 
Phloiophilidae,  only  one  genus,  no  keys;  Peltidae,  to  subfamilies  (3)  of  adults,  to 
subfamilies  (2)  and  genera  (5)  of  larvae,  to  genera  (4)  of  adult  Decamerinae;  Tro- 
gossitidae,  to  subfamilies  (2)  of  adults  and  larvae,  to  genera  (3)  of  adult  New 
Zealand  Lophocaterinae,  to  genera  (5)  of  larval  Trogossitinae;  Chaetosomatidae, 
to  genera  (2)  of  adults;  Cleridae,  to  subfamilies  (8)  of  adults,  to  genera  (6)  of  adults 
and  to  genera  (5)  of  larvae  of  New  Zealand;  Phycosecidae,  to  species  (4)  of  only 
included  genus;  Melyridae,  to  subfamilies  (6)  of  adults  and  larvae,  to  genera  (8) 
or  species  (12)  of  larvae.  Many  discussions,  descriptions,  or  illustrations  of  larvae, 
adults,  fossils,  morphology,  and  habits  explain  the  systematics. 


DIE  CRIOCERINEN  AFRIKAS  (COL.  CHRYSOMELIDAE).  By  E.  Heinze 
and  W.  Pinsdorf.  Ent.  Arb.  Mus.  Frey  1 3 ( 1 ) :  1 56-270,  figs.  1-18  (1962);  14(1). 
252-372,  figs.  19-28  (1963);  15(2) :334-569,  figs.  29-45  ( 1964).— Keys,  descriptions, 
and  some  illustrations  to  3  tribes,  14  genera,  and  307  species  are  included.  The 
genus  Lema  contains  209  of  the  species. 


A  MODIFIED  MALAISE  INSECT  TRAP.  By  G.  D.  Butler,  Jr.  Pan-Pacific  Ent. 
41(1) :51-53,  illus.  1965. — The  modified  trap  can  be  inexpensively  made,  easily 
transported,  quickly  set  up,  and  conveniently  emptied. 


NOTICE 

Robert  R.  Dreisbach  of  Midland,  Michigan,  died  June  24,  1964.  He  was  a  specialist 
in  Hymenoptera  but  was  interested  in  and  collected  all  orders  of  insects.  His  latest 
efforts  were  toward  a  list  of  the  insects  of  Michigan. 

E.  O.  Essig  of  the  University  of  California  at  Berkeley  died  November  23,  1964. 
He  was  a  teacher  of  entomologists  and  a  specialist  on  aphids.  His  three  books,  A 
History  of  Entomology,  Insects  and  Mites  of  Western  North  America,  and  College 
Entomology,  are  known  to  all. 

James  A.  G.  Rehn  died  January  25,  1965.  He  was  an  outstanding  authority  on  the 
Orthopetera.  However,  he  was  known  to  all  coleopterists  as  the  curator  of  insects  at 
the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


43 


A  REVISION  OF  THE  GENUS  CHARISIUS 
(COLEOPTERA:  ALLECULIDAE) 

By  J.  M.  Campbell1 


Introduction 

The  genus  Charisius  was  first  described  by  Champion  (1888)  in  the 
Biologia  Centrali- Americana.  He  erected  the  genus  to  receive  four  species 
which  he  considered  distinct  from  the  genus  Allecula  Fabricius.  In  1893, 
C  hampion  added  an  additional  species  to  the  genus  in  the  supplement  to 
the  family  Alleculidae  in  the  “Biologia,”  and,  in  1901,  Linell  added  a  new 
species  from  Florida.  Since  that  date,  there  have  been  no  additional 
publications  pertaining  to  the  genus. 

Charisius  is  a  very  interesting  genus  of  alleculids  because  of  the  high 
elevations  at  which  all  of  its  species  are  naturally  found.  Other  related 
genera,  except  the  monotypic  genus  Nurses  Champion,  are  found  primarily 
below  4,000  feet.  A  few  species  of  Isomira  Mulsant  and  Lobopoda  Sober 
may  be  found  at  moderately  high  elevations,  but  only  rarely  above  4,000 
feet. 

1  have  divided  Charisius  into  three  groups,  the  Fasciatus  Group,  the 
Salvini  Group,  and  the  Zunilensis  Group.  The  three  species  of  the  Fasciatus 
Group  have  been  collected  at  elevations  ranging  from  5,000  to  10,000  feet, 
with  most  recorded  localities  between  7,000  and  9,000  feet;  the  two  species 
of  the  Zunilensis  Group  are  found  at  elevations  ranging  from  4,000  to 
5,000  feet,  except  for  a  possible  introduction  in  Florida;  and  the  Salvini 
Group  is  found  at  somewhat  intermediate  elevations  ranging  from  4,000  to 
7,000  feet. 

The  revision  of  the  genus  was  made  possible  by  the  generous  loan  of 
material  from  the  British  Museum  (Natural  History)  which  included  syn- 
types  of  all  the  species  described  by  Champion.  I  would  like  to  acknowledge 
the  assistance  of  Miss  C.  M.  F.  von  Hayek  of  the  British  Museum  through¬ 
out  the  course  of  this  study  and  to  James  Marshall  for  observing  the  holo- 
type  of  Charisius  floridanus.  In  addition,  I  would  like  to  express  my  ap¬ 
preciation  to  Hugh  B.  Leech  and  the  California  Academy  of  Sciences  for 
the  loan  of  material  and  to  Richard  B.  Selander  for  the  donation  of  ma¬ 
terial  from  his  personal  collection.  I  would  also  like  to  express  my  appre¬ 
ciation  to  the  Society  of  the  Sigma  Xi  and  the  Sigma  Xi  RESA  Research 
Fund  which  supported  the  field  work  of  this  investigation.  For  allowing 
me  to  accompany  him  in  Mexico  during  the  summer  of  1962,  1  would 
particularly  like  to  thank  Edward  L.  Mockford. 

The  primary  objectives  of  this  work  are:  ( 1 )  to  give  an  adequate  key 
for  the  separation  of  the  species;  (2)  to  designate  lectotypes  of  Champion’s 
species;  (3)  to  suggest  a  phylogeny  for  the  species  of  the  genus;  (4)  to 
describe  the  new  species  at  hand;  and  (5)  to  give  a  brief  discussion  of  the 
geographic  range  of  the  species  of  the  genus. 


1  Research  Entomologist,  University  of  Kentucky,  Lexington,  Kentucky. 


44 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


Bionomics 

Unfortunately,  very  little  is  known  of  the  bionomics  of  this  group.  The 
larvae  are  unknown.  Adults  may  be  found  by  beating  trees  bearing  an 
abundant  covering  of  lichens  upon  which  they  probably  feed.  I  collected 
five  specimens  from  a  small  tree  near  a  tree  stump  and  one  specimen  was 
collected  on  a  stump.  It  is  probable  that  the  larvae  live  in  dead  wood  as 
do  the  larvae  of  most  United  States  genera  of  Alleculidae. 

Methods  and  Terms 

Records  are  given  for  all  specimens  studied.  These  records  list  the 
exact  localities  of  the  specimens,  the  elevation  of  the  locality,  the  date  of 
collection  if  known,  the  collection  from  which  the  specimen  was  borrowed, 
and  finally  the  number  of  specimens  in  each  series.  The  following  abbre¬ 
viations  were  used  to  designate  the  collections:  (BMNH)  British  Museum, 
(CAS)  California  Academy  of  Sciences,  and  (JMC)  my  personal  collection. 

Pronotal  index  expresses  the  ratio  of  the  length  of  the  pronotum  along 
the  midline  to  the  width  at  the  basal  angles.  This  ratio  is  multiplied  by 
100  for  convenience  in  handling.  Total  length  of  the  specimen  is  measured 
in  situ  to  the  nearest  Vi  mm.  Total  length  is  the  distance  between  the 
anterior  margin  of  the  labrum  and  the  apices  of  the  elytra.  All  measure¬ 
ments  were  made  with  the  aid  of  an  ocular  micrometer. 

The  genus  Charisius  has  only  five  visible  sterna.  These  are  numbered 
one  through  five  although  morphologically  they  are  the  third  through  the 
seventh.  The  morphological  eighth  and  ninth  sterna  of  the  male  are  in- 
vaginated  and  bilobed.  In  referring  to  these  structures,  they  are  called  the 
lobes  of  the  eighth  and/or  ninth  sterna.  The  terms  basal  piece  and  apical 
piece  are  used  in  describing  the  male  genitalia.  The  term  basal  piece  was 
proposed  by  Sharp  and  Muir  (1912)  and  has  since  been  referred  to  as 
gonocoxite  (Michener,  1944)  and  as  phallobase  (Snodgrass,  1935).  I 
have  used  the  term  apical  piece  for  convenience.  It  is  synonymous  with 
the  terms  lateral  lobes  (Sharp  and  Muir),  gonostyli  (Michener),  and 
parameres  (Snodgrass).  The  male  genitalia,  eighth,  and  ninth  sterna  are 
collectively  called  the  male  terminalia.  The  small,  modified,  triangular  setae 
found  on  the  male  terminalia  are  referred  to  as  dentiform  setae. 


Systematics 
Charisius  Champion 

Charisius  Champion,  1888,  Biol.  Centr.-Amer.,  Ins.,  Coleop.  4(1)  :421. 

Body  elongate;  glabrous;  color  ranging  from  reddish-brown  to  black;  surface 
smooth,  strongly  shining.  Length  6  to  1 3  mm. 

Vertex  moderately  densely  punctate;  a  small,  impunctate  area  placed  between 
posterior  margin  of  eyes.  Apical  segment  of  labial  palpi  elongate-triangular,  apex 
slightly  longer  than  outer  side;  apical  segment  of  maxillary  palpi  broadly  triangular, 
apex  about  equal  in  length  to  outer  side;  mandibles  with  apex  shallowly  emarginate. 
Antennae  long,  filiform;  apex  of  fifth  segment  reaching  to  base  of  pronotum  when 
pulled  posteriad  over  dorsal  surface  of  body;  third  segment  approximately  three 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


45 


times  as  long  as  second,  slightly  shorter  than  fourth;  following  segments  approximate¬ 
ly  equal  in  length  to  third.  Eyes  moderately  small  in  size,  usually  separated  by  dis¬ 
tance  approximately  equal  to  diameter  of  an  eye. 


Pronotum  with  base  distinctly  narrower  than  base  of  elytra;  sides  variable,  ranging 
from  strongly  narrowed  from  base  to  apex  to  widest  near  middle  and  rounded; 
sides  and  base  distinctly  margined.  Basal  foveae  small,  moderately  deeply  impressed, 
connected  across  base  of  pronotum  by  a  deep,  transverse  prebasal  groove.  Prosternum 
elongate  and  transverse  anteriad  of  procoxae,  prosternal  elongation  abruptly  declivous 
postenad  of  procoxae;  mesosternum  abruptly  declivous  just  anteriad  of  mesocoxae- 
metasternum  very  elongate.  Venter  of  thorax  moderately  densely,  deeply  punctate; 
glabrous.  Legs  moderately  sparsely  setate;  setae  short,  becoming  denser  approaching 
apex  of  legs.  Third  and  fourth  tarsal  segments  of  anterior  and  intermediate  tarsi 
and  penultimate  segment  of  posterior  tarsi  broadly  lobed  in  both  male  and  female, 
basal  two  segments  of  anterior  tarsi  of  male  lobed  ventrally  (except  in  C.  salvini). 

Elytra  elongate,  sides  parallel  for  basal  half  and  then  evenly  rounded  to  apex; 
elytial  striae  moderately  shallowly  impressed  near  base,  becoming  more  deeply  im- 
pitssed  appioaching  apex;  strial  punctures  small,  densely  placed  along  striae;  strial 
interstices  convex,  impunctate,  or  finely  and  obsoletely  punctate.  Elytral  epipleurae 
ending  just  anteriad  of  apex  of  elytra;  evenly  arched  from  base  to  apex.  Ab¬ 
dominal  steina  impunctate  or  finely,  sparsely  punctate.  Fifth  sternum  evenly  convex 
rarely  excavate  in  male. 

Eighth  sternum  of  male  with  two  large,  well  developed,  elongate  lobes;  lobes 
moderately  broad,  straight,  or  curved  mediad  approaching  apex  (angulate  in  C. 
sajvini);  apex  bearing  very  small,  densely  placed  denitiform  setae  which  extend 
along  inner  margin  to  base  of  lobes.  Ninth  sternum  bilobed;  lobes  small,  reaching 
only  to  base  of  eighth  sternal  lobes;  glabrous.  Male  gentalia  narrowed  from  base  to 
apex,  apical  piece  strongly  narrowed,  apex  very  narrowly  rounded,  bearing  densely 
placed  dentiform  setae  on  sides. 

Type-Species.  I  here  designate  Charisius  fasciatus  Champion  as  the 
type-species  of  the  genus. 

Discussion.  Charisius  is  a  member  of  the  tribe  Alleculini  of  the  sub- 
family  Alleculinae.  This  tribe  is  distinguished  from  other  tribes  of  the 
subfamily  in  having  lobed  tarsi  and  a  narrowly  triangular  intercoxal  process 
of  the  abdomen.  Charisius  seems  to  be  most  closely  related  to  the  genus 
A  llecula  and  the  wingless  monotypic  genus  N arses.  All  have  the  same  shape 
and  general  appearance,  similarly  shaped  maxillary  and  labial  palpi,  very 
broadly  lobed  anterior  and  intermediate  tarsi,  and  narrowly  elongate  eighth 
sternal  lobes. 

The  genus  Charisius  is  distinct  from  other  Mexican  and  Central  Amer¬ 
ican  genera  of  alleculids  by  the  possession  of  a  deep,  prebasal,  transverse 
groove  connecting  the  basal  foveae  of  the  pronotum.  In  addition,  the 
shining,  glabrous  surface  of  the  body;  elongate  shape;  sparsely  to  mod¬ 
erately  densely  punctate  pronotum;  well  developed  wings;  and  in  some 
species,  the  presence  of  distinct  yellow  bands  across  the  elytra  will  easily 
separate  Charisius  from  related  genera. 


Key  to  Groups  and  Species  of  Charisius 


i. 


Elytra  with  two  or  three  light  yellow  transverse  bands 
Elytra  without  yellow  markings - 


Fasciatus  Group 


2 

4 


46 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


Elytra  with  a  greatly  expanded  yellow  band  in  basal  half  (fig.  18);  band  interrupted 
only  by  elytral  suture;  sides  of  pronotum  (fig.  11)  distinctly  narrowed  from  base 

to  apex  - - MEXICANUS 

Elytra  with  anterior  band  reduced  to  oval  spot  or  absent  (figs.  15-17),  not  reaching 
elytral  suture;  sides  of  pronotum  (fig.  9-10)  parallel,  sinuate,  or  converging  slightly 

in  basal  half - 

Anterior  yellow  spot  (fig.  17)  extending  from  sides  to  middle  of  each  elytron;  sides 

of  pronotum  (fig.  10)  parallel  for  basal  half - PICTURATUS 

Anterior  yellow  spot  either  absent  (fig.  16)  or  represented  by  a  large,  oval  spot 

placed  in  middle  of  each  elytron  (fig.  15) - FASCIATUS 

Pronotum  coarsely,  evenly  punctate;  anterior  tibiae  of  male  slightly  expanded 
ventral ly;  fifth  sternum  of  male  distinctly  excavate  in  middle;  apex  of  elytra 

_ Salvini  Group  SALVINI 

Pronotum  finely  punctate;  male  anterior  tibiae  and  fifth  sternum  unmodified;  elytra 

without  darkened  elytral  apices - Zunilensis  Group  5 

Pronotum  evenly  punctate;  elytral  interstices  impunctate;  length  greater  than  8  mm. 

_ _ _ _ _ ZUNILENSIS 

Pronotum  more  densely  punctate  in  middle  than  on  sides;  elytral  interstices  very 

finely  punctate;  length  less  than  IVz  mm. - INTERSTITIALIS 


Phytogeny.  The  suggested  phylogenetic  relationships  of  the  species  of 
Charisius  are  outlined  in  figure  1.  Based  on  the  Central  and  South  Amer¬ 
ican  species  of  the  genus  Alleculci  and  other  related  genera  of  alleculids, 
the  ancestral  species  of  Charisius  probably  had  the  following  characteristics: 
pronotum  with  distinct,  transverse  prebasal  groove;  surface  glabrous  dor- 
sally;  anterior  tibiae  of  the  male  widened  on  the  ventral  margin;  lobes  of 
the  eighth  sternum  of  the  male  either  straight  or  simply  curved  mediad 
approaching  the  apex;  fifth  sternum  evenly  convex  in  both  male  and  female; 
basal  four  segments  of  the  anterior  tarsi  lobed  ventrally  in  the  male;  color 
dark  brown,  without  elytral  patterns;  pronotum  only  slightly  wider  than 
long  and  coarsely  punctate. 

Three  main  lines  may  be  recognized  as  having  evolved  from  this  hypo¬ 
thetical  ancestral  species.  The  line  giving  rise  to  the  Zunilensis  Group  re¬ 
mains  essentially  primitive  except  in  having  the  anterior  tibiae  of  the  male 
unmodified.  The  line  leading  to  the  Salvini  and  Fasciatus  groups  is  spe¬ 
cialized  in  having  sparser  punctation  of  the  pronotum,  a  smaller  pronotal 
index,  and  at  least  the  beginning  of  the  development  of  color  as  shown 
by  the  black  elytral  apices  of  C.  salvini.  The  line  leading  to  the  Salvini 
Group  is  specialized  in  having  the  fifth  sternum  of  the  male  excavate,  the 
lobes  of  the  male  eighth  sternum  strongly  angulate  on  the  sides,  and  the 
lobes  of  the  basal  two  segments  of  the  male  anterior  tarsi  lost.  The  line 
leading  to  the  Fasciatus  Group  is  specialized  in  having  the  pronotum 
sparsely  punctate,  the  pronotal  index  very  small,  the  elytra  with  distinct 
transverse  bands,  and  the  body  larger  in  size.  Within  the  Fasciatus  Group, 
two  lines  developed,  one  leading  to  C.  mexicanus  and  the  other  leading 
to  C.  fasciatus  and  C.  picturatus.  In  the  line  leading  to  C.  mexicanus  the 
sides  of  the  pronotum  became  strongly  narrowed,  the  elytral  banding  be¬ 
came  greatly  expanded,  and  the  lobes  of  the  eighth  sternum  of  the  male 
straight. 

FASCIATUS  GROUP 

The  Fasciatus  Group  contains  three  species,  all  of  which  are  large 
(ranging  in  length  from  10  to  13  mm.),  elongate  beetles  with  either  two  or 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


47 


three  yellow  bands  placed  transversely  across  the  elytra.  The  width  of  the 
pronotum  is  distinctly  greater  than  the  length  and  the  surface  is  very  finely 
and  sparsely  punctate.  The  elytral  striae  bear  very  fine  and  very  closely 
placed  punctures;  the  strial  interstices  are  flat  at  the  base  (except  in 
C.  picturatus)  and  convex  approaching  the  apex;  and  the  interstices  are  im- 
punctate.  The  anterior  tibiae  of  the  male  are  expanded  on  the  inner  side 
near  the  middle  and  the  anterior  tarsi  of  the  male  have  the  four  basal 
segments  broadly  lobed  ventrally. 

Charisius  fasciatus  Champion 
(Figs.  3,9,  15,  16) 

Charisius  fasciatus  Champion,  1888,  Biol.  Centr.-Amer.,  Ins.,  Coleop. 

4(1): 42 1 ,  pi.  19,  figs.  12,  12a,  13. 

Dark  reddish-brown  or  black;  three  light  yellow  transverse  bands  placed  across 
elytra,  anterior  band  often  missing;  margin  of  all  yellow  areas  slightly  dentate, 
completely  surrounded  by  a  narrow  dark  brown  to  black  margin  (figs.  15-16). 
Length  10i/2  to  12i/2  mm. 

Vertex  moderately  densely,  finely,  and  shallowly  punctate.  Pronotum  sparsely  but 
evenly  punctate;  punctures  small  and  very  shallowly  impressed;  sides  parallel  or 
slightly  converging  and  sinuate  in  basal  two-thirds  then  broadly,  evenly  rounded  to 
apex  (fig.  9);  pronotal  index  of  five  specimens  77  to  80,  mean  77.8.  Prosternum  and 
proepisterna  smooth,  impunctate;  metasternum  impunctate  in  middle,  punctures  be¬ 
coming  moderately  densely  and  deeply  impressed  approaching  sides.  Anterior  tibiae 
of  male  slightly,  convexly  expanded  on  middle  of  ventral  surface.  Elytral  striae  un¬ 
impressed  near  base,  becoming  moderately  deeply  impressed  approaching  apex,  strial 
punctures  very  small,  shallowly  and  very  densely  impressed  along  striae;  interstices 
flat  or  very  slightly  convex  near  base,  becoming  distinctly  convex  nearing  apex; 
impunctate. 

Lobes  of  eighth  sternum  of  male  (fig.  3)  narrowly  and  evenly  curved  medially 
from  near  base  to  apex;  apex  and  inner  sides  bearing  small,  densely  placed  dentiform 
setae;  outer  side  bearing  dentiform  setae  only  on  apical  half  and  a  few  large  setae 
placed  on  outer  margin.  Apex  of  lobes  of  ninth  sternum  obliquely  transverse. 

Type.  As  lectotype,  I  have  selected  a  male  from  Guatemala  collected  by 
Champion  and  labeled  Quiche  Mts.,  7-9000  feet.  The  specimen  is  in  the 
British  Museum  (Natural  History). 

Geographic  Distribution.  This  species  is  known  only  from  the  high¬ 
lands  of  central  Guatemala.  It  has  been  collected  at  elevations  ranging 
from  4-5000  feet  to  8500-10,500  feet  (elevations  given  as  recorded  by 
Champion) . 

Records.  GUATEMALA;  Calderas,  7000  feet  (BMNH-Biologia  Col¬ 
lection)  1;  Cerro  Zunil,  4-5000  feet  (BMNH-Biologia  Collection)  2; 
Quiche  Mountains,  7-9000  feet  (BMNH-Biologia  Collection)  1;  Totoni- 
capam,  8,500-10,500  feet  ( BMNH-Biologia  Collection)  2. 

Discussion.  Charisius  fasciatus  may  be  divided  into  two  distinct  forms 
based  on  coloration.  In  one  form,  represented  by  two  specimens  from 
Totonicapam  (8,500  to  10,500  feet)  and  one  specimen  from  the  Quiche 
Mountains  (7,000  to  9,000  feet)  the  body  is  reddish-brown  and  the  elytra 
have  three  distinct  yellow  transverse  bands,  each  surrounded  by  a  narrow, 
dark  brown  to  black  ring  (fig.  15). 


48 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


In  the  second  form,  the  body  is  normally  black,  the  elytra  either  reddish- 
brown  or  black;  the  anterior  yellow  band  is  entirely  absent;  and  the  elytral 
apices  are  black  (fig.  16).  In  one  specimen  the  apical  band  is  partially 
reduced  to  form  three  small  spots.  This  form  is  represented  by  three 
specimens,  two  from  Cerro  Zunil  and  one  from  Calderas. 

Because  of  the  absence  of  any  clearly  defined  morphological  variation 
between  the  two  forms  either  externally  or  in  the  male  terminalia,  I  have 
followed  the  example  of  Champion  in  considering  the  two  forms  as  mem¬ 
bers  of  a  single  species,  but  the  question  of  the  true  status  of  these  two 
forms  can  only  be  satisfactorily  demonstrated  by  additional  collections. 

By  comparing  the  localities  with  Champion’s  (1907)  itinerary,  I  found 
that  the  specimen  from  Calderas  was  collected  during  either  June  or  July 
and  those  from  Quiche  Mountains  and  Totonicapam  were  collected  during 
August. 

Charisius  picturatus  Champion 
(Figs.  10,  17) 

Charisius  picturatus  Champion,  1893,  Biol.  Centr.-Amer.,  Ins.,  Coleop. 

4(1)  :565,  pi.  23,  fig.  21. 

Reddish-brown;  with  three  light  yellow  bands  placed  across  each  elytron,  all 
bands  narrowly,  irregularly  surrounded  by  dark  brown  coloration  (fig.  17).  Length  11 
mm. 

Head  densely  and  moderately  deeply  punctate.  Pronotum  moderately  finely,  sparse¬ 
ly,  and  evenly  punctate;  punctures  moderately  shallowly  impressed;  sides  parallel  for 
basal  two-thirds  and  then  evenly  rounded  to  apex  (fig.  10);  sides  and  base  distinctly 
and  deeply  margined;  mean  pronotal  index  of  two  specimens  80.0,  ranging  from 
78  to  82.  Elytra  with  striae  moderately  deeply  and  evenly  impressed  from  base  to 
apex;  strial  punctures  deeply  impressed,  circular  in  shape;  strial  interstices  moderately 
convex,  impunctate.  Prosternum  moderately  densely  and  unevenly  punctate;  proepi- 
sterna  sparsely  punctate,  punctures  large  and  deeply  impressed;  metasternum  mod¬ 
erately  sparsely  punctate  in  middle,  punctures  becoming  very  large,  densely,  and 
deeply  impressed  approaching  sides.  Anterior  tibiae  of  male  with  ventral  margin 
evenly  and  concavely  expanded  from  base  for  basal  half  and  then  abruptly  narrowed 
to  normal  diameter;  apical  portion  of  ventral  margin  densely  pubescent. 

Type.  As  lectotype,  I  have  selected  a  male  labeled  Omilteme,  Guerrero, 
Mexico,  8000  feet,  July.  The  specimen  was  collected  by  H.  H.  Smith  and 
is  in  the  British  Museum  (Natural  History). 

Geographic  Distribution.  This  species  is  known  only  from  the  type 
locality. 

Records.  MEXICO:  Guerrero:  Omilteme  (Omiltemi),  8000  feet,  July 
( BMNH-Biologia  Collection)  1. 

Discussion.  This  species  is  very  similar  in  appearance  to  C.  fasciatus, 
particularly  to  the  form  having  three  yellow  bands  across  the  elytra.  It 
differs  primarily  in  having  the  margins  of  the  yellow  regions  very  irregular, 
the  anterior  spot  placed  on  the  outer  sides  of  the  elytra,  and  the  apical 
spot  small  and  somewhat  crescent-shaped.  Morphologically  it  differs  pri¬ 
marily  in  having  the  punctation  of  the  head,  pronotum,  and  the  underside 
of  the  thorax  much  denser;  more  deeply  impressed  elytral  striae;  and  more 
convex  elytral  interstices. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


49 


Charts ius  mexicanus  Campbell,  NEW  SPECIES 
(Figs.  4,  8,  11,  18) 

Light  orange-brown;  elytra  very  conspicuously  colored  with  three  large  yellow 
transverse  bands  (fig.  18).  Length  11  to  13  mm. 

Head  densely  and  moderately  deeply  punctate.  Pronotum  deeply  and  evenly 
punctate;  sides  moderately  straight,  narrowed  conspicuously  from  base  to  apex  (fig. 
11  ).  ver y  strongly  defiexed;  mean  pronotal  index  of  13  specimens  70.4,  ranging  from 
67  to  74  (Sx  — .5);  midline  slightly  depressed  longitudinally. 

Anterioi  tibiae  of  male  distinctly,  triangularly  widened  on  inner  side  near  middle. 
Prosternum  shallowly,  unevenly  punctate;  proepisterna  sparsely  punctate,  punctures 
large  and  deeply  placed;  metasternum  sparsely,  shallowly  punctate  in  middle,  punc¬ 
tures  becoming  moderately  densely  and  deeply  impressed  approaching  sides.  Elytra 
with  striae  very  shallowly  impressed  near  base,  becoming  somewhat  deeper  approach¬ 
ing  apex;  strial  punctures  circular,  moderately  densely  placed;  interstices  of  elytral 
striae  flat  in  basal  half,  becoming  moderately  convex  nearing  apex;  bearing  median 
row  of  very  small  and  shallow  punctures.  Abdominal  sterna  finely,  sparsely,  and 
evenly  punctate;  fifth  sternum  bearing  long,  conspicuous  setae  along  sides  and  near 
apex;  apex  bearing  densely  placed  short  setae,  distinctly  concave  in  middle  in  male, 
convex  in  female;  fourth  sternum  with  scattered  setae  along  apical  margin. 

Lobes  of  eighth  sternum  of  male  (fig.  4)  straight,  broad;  apex  evenly  rounded; 
apex  and  inner  side  of  lobes  densely  covered  with  very  small  dentiform  setae,  a 
few  long,  straight  setae  placed  along  outer  side.  Lobes  of  ninth  sternum  narrow, 
slightly  curved  mediad  approaching  apex;  apex  narrowly  rounded.  Apex  of  male 
genitalia  as  in  Figure  8. 

Type.  Holotype,  male,  from  5.2  miles  west  of  Acultzingo  (Veracruz) 
Puebla,  Mexico;  July  6,  1962;  J.  M.  Campbell.  It  is  in  the  British  Museum 
(Natural  History). 

Geographic  Distribution.  This  species  is  known  from  elevations  above 
6000  feet  in  the  Mexican  states  of  Mexico,  Morelos  and  Puebla. 

Records.  MEXICO:  Country  label  only  (BMNH)  2.  Mexico:  Ame- 
cameca,  9600  feet,  June  (CAS)  2.  Morelos:  Tres  Marias,  9000  feet 
(BMNH)  2.  Puebla:  5.2  miles  west  Acultzingo  (Veracruz),  8000  feet, 
July  ( JMC)  5;  6  miles  northeast  Teziutlan,  6000  feet,  August  (JMC)  2. 

Discussion.  1  collected  specimens  of  this  species  near  Acultzingo  by 
beating  a  large  tree  heavily  covered  with  lichens.  This  locality  is  almost 
directly  on  the  continental  divide  of  Mexico  and  receives  moderately  heavy 
rainfall  and  very  dense  fog  cover  during  the  rainy  season.  The  larvae  of 
this  species  possibly  live  in  dead  stumps  as  the  adults  were  collected  from 
a  tree  adjacent  to  a  dead  stump,  although  other  nearby  trees  of  the  same 
species  did  not  yield  any  specimens. 

Charisius  mexicanus  is  similar  to  C.  fasciatus  and  C.  picturatus,  but 
it  may  readily  be  identified  by  the  greatly  expanded  and  very  irregularly 
dentate  markings  of  the  elytra  and  the  very  conspicuously  narrowed  sides 
of  the  pronotum. 

The  adults  of  this  species  have  been  collected  from  June  to  August. 


50 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


ZUNILENSIS  GROUP 

The  Zunilensis  Group  contains  two  species,  both  of  which  are  smaller 
than  the  species  of  the  Fasciatus  Group  (from  6V2  to  10  mm.).  They  are 
characterized  by  the  absence  of  any  yellow  markings  on  the  elytra;  the 
large  pronotal  index;  the  pronotum  distinctly  narrower  than  the  base  of 
the  elytra;  the  surface  of  the  pronotum  coarsely  punctate;  the  anterior 
tibiae  of  the  male  not  expanded;  and  the  broad  and  straight  lobes  of  the 
eighth  sternum. 


Charisius  zunilensis  Champion 

(Figs.  6,  12) 

Charisius  zunilensis  Champion,  1888,  Biol.  Centr.-Amer.,  Ins.,  Coleop. 

4(1)  :422,  pi.  19,  fig.  14. 

Dark  brown.  Length  8V2  to  9Vi  mm. 

Head  very  densely  punctate;  punctures  moderate  in  size  and  depth.  Pronotum 
quadrate  with  sides  slightly  narrowed  nearing  base  (fig.  12);  mean  pronotal  index  of 
four  specimens  92.5,  ranging  from  90  to  95;  surface  densely  punctate,  punctures 
moderately  small  and  shallowly  impressed. 

Male  with  ventral  surface  of  anterior  tibiae  unmodified;  four  basal  segments  of 
anterior  tarsi  distinctly  lobed  ventrally.  Prosternum  very  sparsely  and  shallowly 
punctate;  proepisterna  moderately  punctate,  punctures  small  and  very  shallowly  im¬ 
pressed;  metasternum  finely  and  sparsely  punctate  in  middle,  punctures  becoming 
moderately  densely  and  deeply  impressed  near  sides.  Elytra  with  striae  moderately 
deeply  impressed  near  base,  becoming  deeply  impressed  near  apex;  strial  punctures 
small,  circular,  deeply  impressed;  strial  interstices  moderately  convex,  impunctate. 
Abdominal  sterna  very  finely  and  sparsely  punctate,  apical  margin  of  fifth  sternum 
distinctly  concave;  sides  of  apical  margin  bearing  a  few  short  setae. 

Lobes  of  eighth  sternum  of  male  (fig.  6)  moderately  broad,  straight;  apex  of  lobes 
evenly  rounded,  rather  densely  covered  with  small,  densely  placed  dentiform  setae; 
inner  margin  of  lobes  bearing  moderately  densely  placed  small  spines.  Lobes  of 
ninth  sternum  short,  both  outer  and  inner  sides  rounded,  apex  of  lobes  broadly 
rounded. 

Type.  As  lectotype,  I  have  selected  a  male  collected  by  Champion  and 
labeled  Cerro  Zunil,  4,000-5,000  feet,  Guatemala.  The  specimen  is  in  the 
British  Museum  (Natural  History). 

Geographic  Distribution.  Known  only  from  the  type  locality. 

Records.  GUATEMALA:  Cerro  Zunil,  4,000  to  5,000  feet  (BMNH- 
Biologia  Collection)  4. 

Discussion.  Three  of  the  six  known  species  of  Charisius  are  from  Cerro 
Zunil.  These  are  C.  zunilensis,  C.  fasciatus,  and  C.  salvini.  Each  of  these 
species  were  collected  by  Champion  at  an  altitude  of  4,000  to  5,000  feet. 
They  belong  to  separate  species  group  and  may  be  readily  separated  by  the 
key  characters. 

Charisius  inter stitialis  Champion 

(Figs.  7,  13) 

Charisius  inter  stitialis  Champion,  1888,  Biol.  Centr.-Amer.,  Ins.,  Coleop. 
4(1) :422. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


51 


Charisius  floridanus  Linell,  1901,  Proc.  Ent.  Soc.  Wash.  4:184.  (NEW 
SYNONYMY.) 

Elongate;  brown,  pronotum  and  head  often  dark  brown.  Length  6V2  to  IV2  mm. 

Head  very  densely,  finely  punctate.  Pronotum  with  sides  parallel  for  basal  two- 
thirds  and  then  angulate  to  apex  (fig.  13);  mean  pronotal  index  of  six  specimens 
89.0,  ranging  from  86  to  94;  surface  densely  punctate;  punctures  moderate  in  size 
and  moderately  impressed,  becoming  more  sparsely  distributed  nearing  sides.  Punc- 
tation  of  underside  of  thorax  and  shape  of  anterior  tibiae  and  tarsi  of  male  similar 
to  those  of  C.  zunilensis.  Elytral  striae  shallowly,  evenly  impressed;  interstices  dis¬ 
tinctly  convex,  bearing  a  median  row  of  very  small,  shallow  punctures.  Remainder 
as  in  C.  zunilensis. 

Lobes  of  eighth  sternum  (fig.  7)  very  similar  to  those  of  C.  zunilensis;  inner  side 
of  lobes  rounded.  Lobes  of  ninth  sternum  very  short,  outer  side  slightly  convex; 
apex  of  lobes  obliquely  truncate. 

Type.  As  lectotype,  I  have  designated  a  male  collected  by  Hoege  from 
Jalapa,  Mexico.  This  specimen  is  in  the  British  Museum  (Natural  History). 
The  holotype  of  C.  floridanus  is  type  number  4174  of  the  USNM.  The 
specimen  is  labeled  Cocoanut  Grove,  Florida. 

Geographic  Distribution.  Known  only  from  the  type  locality  and  one 
specimen  collected  near  Miami,  Florida. 

Records.  MEXICO:  Veracruz:  Jalapa  (4681  ft.)  (BMNH-Biologia 
Collection)  9.  UNITED  STATES:  Florida:  Cocoanut  Grove,  Linell 
(1899). 

Discussion.  This  species  is  very  similar  to  Charisius  zunilensis.  Since 
the  known  ranges  of  these  two  species  are  widely  separated  and  as  there 
are  no  intermediate  specimens,  I  have  chosen  to  follow  Champion’s  ex¬ 
ample  and  consider  the  two  populations  as  separate  species. 

Charisius  interstitialis  may  be  separated  from  C.  zunilensis  by  the  much 
smaller  size  of  the  body;  smaller  punctures  of  the  head  and  pronotum  (the 
punctures  are  more  densely  placed  in  the  middle  half  of  the  pronotum); 
and  the  somewhat  more  narrowly  rounded  apices  of  the  male  ninth  sternal 
lobes. 

The  specimen  described  by  Linell  from  Florida  as  C.  floridanus  is  almost 
certainly  an  accidental  import.  The  Cocoanut  Grove  locality  is  in  the 
vicinity  of  a  tropical  garden. 

James  Marshall  (personal  communication,  1964)  compared  the  holo¬ 
type  of  C.  floridanus  with  a  specimen  of  C.  interstitialis.  He  stated  that 
the  only  apparent  difference  in  the  two  is  that  the  pronotal  groove  of 
C.  floridanus  is  somewhat  more  pronounced.  The  pronotal  index  of  the 
holotype  is  92. 


SALVINI  GROUP 

The  Salvini  Group  contains  only  one  species,  C.  salvini.  The  male  has 
the  anterior  tibiae  expanded  ventrally,  the  basal  two  segments  of  the 
anterior  tarsi  densely  pubescent  ventrally,  the  apical  margin  of  the  fifth 
abdominal  sternum  deeply  excavate,  and  the  eighth  sternal  lobes  angulate 
on  the  sides.  The  elytral  apices  of  both  males  and  females  are  black. 


52 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


In  many  respects,  the  Salvini  Group  is  somewhat  intermediate  between 
the  Fasciatus  Group  and  the  Zunilensis  Group.  It  has  the  apices  of  the 
elytra  black  and  the  anterior  tibiae  of  the  male  expanded  near  the  middle 
which  may  suggest  an  affinity  for  the  Fasciatus  Group.  The  punctation  of 
the  head  and  thorax  as  well  as  the  elytral  structure  is  quite  similar  to  that 
of  the  Zunilensis  Group.  It  is  also  somewhat  intermediate  between  these 
two  groups  in  elevation. 


Charisius  salvini  Champion 
(Figs.  5,  14) 

Charisius  salvini  Champion,  1888,  Biol.  Centr.-Amer.,  Ins.,  Coleop.  4(1): 

423,  pi.  19,  fig.  15. 

Dorsal  surface  reddish-brown,  venter  dark  reddish-brown  to  black,  elytral  apices 
usually  black.  Length  8 Vi  to  10  mm. 

Head  densely,  deeply  punctate.  Pronotum  (fig.  14)  with  sides  parallel  or  some¬ 
what  sinuate  in  basal  two-thirds;  surface  deeply,  densely  punctate;  punctures  large 
and  circular  in  outline;  mean  pronotal  index  of  twelve  specimens  86.6,  ranging 
from  81  to  90  (sx  =  .7);  surface  evenly  convex,  occasionally  slightly  depressed 
along  midline. 

Anterior  tibiae  of  male  very  slightly,  ovally  expanded  on  inner  side  near  middle; 
anterior  tarsi  of  male  with  basal  segment  densely  pubescent  ventrally,  not  lobed; 
second  segment  densely  pubescent  with  small  narrow  lobe.  Prosternum  moderately 
densely,  unevenly,  and  rugosely  punctate;  proepisterna  densely,  evenly  punctate; 
metasternum  moderately  punctate,  becoming  deeply  and  densely  punctate  approach¬ 
ing  sides.  Elytral  striae  moderately  impressed  near  base,  becoming  deeply  impressed 
nearing  apex;  strial  punctures  large,  circular,  closely  placed  along  striae;  strial  in¬ 
terstices  moderately  convex  near  base,  becoming  deeply  impressed  nearing  apex; 
impunctate.  Abdominal  sterna  finely,  sparsely  punctate.  Fifth  sternum  of  male  con¬ 
spicuously  excavate  in  middle,  each  side  of  excavation  very  densely  punctate;  punc¬ 
tures  bearing  moderately  long  setae. 

Male  eighth  sternum  (fig.  5)  with  lobes  angulate  near  middle  of  outer  side;  inner 
sides  evenly  and  narrowly  rounded;  apex  of  lobes  blunt,  obliquely  transverse,  bearing 
small,  moderately  densely  placed  dentiform  setae.  Lobes  of  ninth  sternum  moderately 
broad;  outer  sides  rounded  to  apex,  apex  very  narrowly  rounded. 

Type.  As  lectotype  I  have  selected  the  male  figured  by  Champion  in  the 
“Biologia.”  The  specimen  was  collected  by  Champion  at  Calderas,  Gua¬ 
temala.  It  is  in  the  British  Museum  (Natural  History). 

Geographic  Distribution.  Known  only  from  the  mountainous  regions  of 
southeastern  and  southcentral  Guatemala.  Collected  between  the  altitudes 
of  4,000  and  7,000  feet. 

Records.  GUATEMALA:  Country  label  only  (BMNH-Biologia  Col¬ 
lection)  7;  Calderas  (7000  ft.)  (BMNH-Biologia  Collection)  1;  Capetillo 
(BMNH-Biologia  Collection)  1;  Cerro  Zunil  (4000  ft.)  (BMNH-Biologia 
Collection)  1;  Chinautla  (4000  ft.)  (BMNH-Biologia  Collection)  1; 
Duenas  (4700  ft.)  (BMNH-Biologia  Collection)  1. 


Champion,  G.  C. 


Literature  Cited 


1888.  Family  Cistelidae.  In  Godman,  F.  E.,  and  O.  Salvin,  Biol.  Centr.-Amer., 
Ins.  Coleop.  4(1):  385-465,  pis.  17-21. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


53 


1892-1893.  Heteromera.  In  Godman,  F.  E.,  and  O.  Salvin,  Biol.  Centr  -Amer 
Ins.,  Coleop.  4(1)  :477-572,  pi.  23. 

1907.  Itinerary  of  Mr.  G.  C.  Champion’s  travels  in  Central  America,  1879- 
1883.  Ent.  News  18:33-44. 

Linell,  M.  L. 

1901.  Descriptions  of  some  new  species  of  North  American  heteromerous 
Coleoptera.  Proc.  Ent.  Soc.  Wash.  4:180-186. 

Michener,  C.  D. 

1944.  A  comparative  study  of  the  appendages  of  the  eighth  and  ninth  abdominal 
segments  of  insects.  Ann.  Ent.  Soc.  Amer.  37:336-351. 

Sharp,  D.,  and  F.  Muir 

1912.  The  comparative  anatomy  of  the  male  genital  tube  in  Coleoptera.  Trans. 
Ent.  Soc.  London  60:477-642,  ill  us. 

Snodgrass,  R.  E. 

1935.  Principles  of  insect  morphology.  New  York.  667  pp.,  illus. 


■fasciatus 

picturatus 

mexicanus 

salvini 

interstitialis 

zunilensis 


Figure  1.  Proposed  phylogeny  of  the  genus  Charisius. 


Figure  2.  Charisius  mexicanus,  new  species.  (Drawing  by  Mrs.  Thomas  Prickett.) 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


55 


3  4 


Figures  3-7.  Ventral  view  of  male  eighth  and  ninth  sterna  of  species  of  Charisius. 
3 — jasciatus.  4 — mexicanus.  5 — salvini.  6 — zunilensis.  7 — interstitialis. 


Volume  19 


56 


THE  COLEOPTERI5TS'  BULLETIN 


Figure  8.  Ventral  view  of  apical  two-thirds  of  male  genitalia  of  Charisius  mex- 
icanus.  Figures  9-14.  Pronotal  outline  of  species  of  Charisius.  9 — fasciatus.  10 — 
picturatus.  1 1 — mexicanus.  12 — zunilensis.  13 — intei stitialis.  14 — salvini.  Figures 
15-18.  Elytral  markings  of  species  of  Charisius.  15  and  16 — fasciatus.  17 — picturatus. 
18 — mexicanus. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


57 


NOTES  ON  TWO  IMPORTANT  COLLECTIONS  OF 

COLEOPTERA  IN  BRAZIL 

By  C.  A.  Triplehorn1 


When  1  learned  that  I  had  been  chosen  to  spend  two  years  in  Brazil  as 
Entomologist  on  The  Ohio  State  University  Contract  Team  (United  States 
Agency  for  International  Development),  1  immediately  began  to  assemble 
as  much  information  as  possible  on  Brazilian  insect  collections  which  I 
might  be  able  to  visit.  The  best  source  of  information  was  furnished  by 
Doris  H.  Blake  (1964,  Some  insect  collections  in  South  America,  Proc. 
Ent.  Soc.  Wash.  66:55-59;  and  in  litt.).  Recently  I  have  had  the  opportu¬ 
nity  to  visit  two  important  collections  in  Sao  Paulo  which  no  serious  student 
of  Neotropical  insects  can  afford  to  neglect. 

Mrs.  Blake  devotes  a  paragraph  to  a  glowing  account  of  the  collections 
of  the  Departamento  de  Zoologia  da  Secretaria  da  Agricultura.  Neverthe¬ 
less,  I  was  totally  unprepared  for  the  veritable  beehive  of  activity  this 
institution  has  become.  The  Director,  Dr.  P.  E.  Vanzolini,  is  well  known 
to  United  States  workers,  having  obtained  his  Ph.D.  degree  at  Harvard 
under  Dr.  A.  S.  Romer.  Despite  the  fact  that  he  is  primarily  a  herpetologist, 
his  interests  are  broad  and  he  is  extremely  well  informed  in  all  phases  of 
Biology.  I  spent  the  greater  part  of  a  day  on  a  tour  of  the  collections  and 
facilities  with  Dr.  Vanzolini  as  my  guide.  As  a  curator  myself,  I  could  only 
stand  in  awe  at  what  is  being  accomplished  here. 

By  purchase,  gifts,  expeditions  and  a  system  of  collaborators,  the  collec¬ 
tions  are  growing  at  a  fantastic  rate.  Despite  the  rapidity  with  which 
specimens  are  arriving,  a  remarkably  small  backlog  of  unprocessed  material 
is  allowed  to  accumulate.  This  is  especially  impressive  in  the  section  of 
insects  where  a  few  enthusiastic  collectors  can  keep  a  small  army  of  tech¬ 
nicians  busy  mounting,  labelling  and  sorting.  The  staff  is  engaged  in  a 
number  of  fascinating  ecological  and  faunistic  studies  which,  of  course, 
are  further  swelling  the  collections. 

The  Coleoptera  collection,  with  which  I  am  most  familiar,  is  well  main¬ 
tained,  neatly  arranged  and  systematically  up-to-date.  As  in  all  museums 
ot  any  size,  there  is  a  sizable  backlog  of  undetermined  material  in  many 
groups  but  this  is  all  sorted  to  families  and  easily  accessible  to  workers. 
They  do  not  use  the  unit  tray  system  but  are  pinning  directly  into  the 
bottoms  of  the  drawers,  allowing,  it  would  seem,  plenty  of  room  for  expan¬ 
sion.  However,  at  the  rate  the  collection  is  growing  and  the  enthusiasm  of 
the  current  staff,  it  will  be  only  a  short  time  before  expansion  becomes  a 
major  concern. 

Among  the  insects,  current  emphasis  is  placed  on  the  Diptera  and 
Coleoptera.  There  are  three  Coleoptera  specialists  on  the  staff  at  present, 
as  previously  noted  by  Blake  (1964,  p.  56).  Hans  Reichardt  is,  at  this 


1  Presently  at  Escola  Superior  de  Agricultura  “Luiz  de  Queiroz,”  Caixa  Postal  9, 
Piracicaba,  Sao  Paulo,  Brazil;  permanently  at  Ohio  State  University,  Columbus,  Ohio, 
U.S.A. 


58 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


writing,  doing  graduate  work  at  Harvard  University,  specializing  on  Cara- 
bidae  under  Dr.  P.  J.  Darlington.  He  also  works  on  Bostrichidae. 

U.  R.  Martins,  who  works  on  Cerambycidae,  Languriinae  and  Barini, 
is  planning  to  enter  the  Graduate  School  of  the  University  of  California 
and  Padre  F.  S.  Pereira  continues  his  fine  work  on  Scarabaeidae  and 
Passalidae.  In  addition,  Frederico  Lane,  who  has  retired,  remains  on  the 
active  list.  He  is  on  his  fourth  year  at  the  British  Museum  on  a  National 
Science  Foundation  and  Brazilian  grant  to  study  Cerambycidae  and  serves 
as  a  valuable  contact  between  the  two  institutions. 

Another  valuable  function  performed  by  the  Departamento  de  Zoologia 
is  the  training  of  zoologists,  especially  entomologists.  Undergraduate  stu¬ 
dents  obtain  practical  experience  in  museum  techniques  and  problems  in 
taxonomic  research  and  when  they  have  progressed  far  enough  are  encour¬ 
aged  and  aided  in  taking  graduate  work  abroad.  With  such  a  program  for 
developing  well-trained  investigators,  the  future  of  taxonomic  research  in 
Brazil  is  bright  indeed.  At  present  there  are  two  students  working  on 
Coleoptera. 

The  Departamento  de  Zoologia  can  supply  headquarters,  research  facili¬ 
ties  and  help  in  traveling  while  in  Brazil  to  any  qualified  zoologist  who  so 
applies.  Needless  to  say,  this  is  a  valuable  service  to  keep  in  mind  for 
anyone  contemplating  research  in  Brazil.  Dr.  Vanzolini  has  assured  me 
his  wholehearted  cooperation  in  sending  material  to  qualified  specialists 
willing  to  undertake  determinations  for  his  institution.  It  seems  to  me  that 
this  would  be  an  excellent  opportunity  for  coleopterists  interested  in  the 
Neotropical  fauna  to  obtain  a  wealth  of  material  for  study.  At  the  same 
time,  each  group  worked  up  will  greatly  assist  Dr.  Vanzolini  and  his 
colleagues  in  their  ambitious  program.  The  Departamento  de  Zoologia  staff 
is  young,  well  trained  and  dedicated.  Their  methods  are  modern  in  every 
sense  of  the  word  and  they  are  adequately  supported  financially.  This 
institution  appears  destined  to  become  the  outstanding  research  center  for 
systematic  zoology  in  South  America.  Taxonomists  interested  in  borrowing 
material  for  study  should  write  to  Dr.  Vanzolini,  Departamento  de  Zoologia 
da  Secretaria  da  Agricultura,  Avenida  Nazare,  481  Caixa  Postal  7172, 
Sao  Paulo,  Brazil. 

A  large  collection  of  Coleoptera  missed  by  Mrs.  Blake  is  contained  in 
the  Institute  Biologico,  Sao  Paulo.  This  is  an  older  collection  but  is  well 
curated  with  specimens  neatly  mounted  and  labelled.  Much  of  it  has  been 
determined  by  specialists  and  there  are  some  types  deposited  here  (i.e. 
Bondar’s  Curculionidae) .  I  have  compiled  a  list  of  all  of  their  Tenebrionidae 
and  have  made  rather  detailed  notes  on  the  remainder  of  the  Coleoptera 
at  the  family  level.  The  Coleoptera  collection  occupies  246  drawers  of  a 
modified  U.  S.  National  Museum  type,  housed  in  10  large  wooden  cabinets. 
Included  among  these  are  42  drawers  of  Chrysomelidae,  41  Curculionidae, 
39  Scarabaeidae,  33  Cerambycidae  and  10  Carabidae.  Correspondence  in 
regard  to  this  collection  may  be  directed  to:  Dr.  Oswaldo  Giannotti,  Insti¬ 
tuto  Biologico,  Av.  Cons.  Rodrigues  Alves,  1252,  Caixa  Postal  7119, 
Sao  Paulo.  While  not  actively  working  with  the  collection,  Dr.  Giannotti 
speaks  and  reads  English  well  and  is  very  sympathetic  toward  taxonomic 
research. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


59 


LARVAE  OF  SIX  GENERA  OF  CETONIINAE  FROM 
EASTERN  NIGERIA  (COLEOPTERA:  SCARABAEIDAE) 

By  M.  L.  Jerath  and  K.  L.  Unny1’  2 


1  he  scarabaeid  subfamily  Cetoniinae  is  of  world-wide  distribution  and 
includes  many  brightly  colored  and  highly  variegated  beetles  from  the 
tropics.  In  West  Africa  the  group  is  represented  by  about  275  species  be¬ 
longing  to  about  65  genera. 

Larvae  of  several  North  American  species  have  been  described  briefly 
by  various  writers.  The  most  important  work  is  that  of  Hayes  (1928  and 
1929),  Bpving  and  Craighead  (1931)  and  Ritcher  (1945).  Larvae  of 
British  Cetoniinae,  Cetonia  aurata  L.  and  Potasia  cuprea  F.,  were  char¬ 
acterized  by  Van  Emden  (1941). 

The  only  paper  on  African  lamellicorn  larvae  is  from  South  Africa  by 
Oberholzer  (1959),  where  larvae  of  three  genera  were  described:  Pachnoda 
impressa  Goldf.,  Hypselogenia  geotrupina  Billb.,  and  Diplognatha  gagates 
Fabric.  The  larvae  are  unknown  from  West  Africa. 

The  food  of  cetoniid  larvae  according  to  Ritcher  (1958)  is  organic 
matter  in  the  soil,  decaying  wood  or  trash  and  other  debris  accumulated 
in  the  hollows  of  trees  or  elsewhere. 

In  Nigeria  larvae  of  Heterorrhina  smaragdina  were  found  in  decaying 
portion  of  a  Kola  nitida  tree  whereas  those  of  five  other  species  were  col¬ 
lected  from  raphia  or  oil  palm  or  coconut  palm  trees  at  Umudike.  The 
larvae  were  reared  to  the  adult  stage  in  the  laboratory  at  the  Agricultural 
Research  Station  in  jam  jars  on  decaying  raphia  stem.  The  food  was 
changed  once  a  week.  Mortality  was  about  five  percent. 

Cetoniid  larvae  usually  crawl  on  their  backs  and  become  white  and  slug¬ 
gish  as  they  approach  pupation.  The  larva  then  builds  a  small  cell  of  decay¬ 
ing  material  and  encloses  itself.  It  remains  in  that  condition  for  2-3  days  be¬ 
fore  it  pupates.  Duration  of  the  pupal  stage  for  the  various  species  at  room 
temperature  is  as  follows:  Pachnoda  marginella,  10-14  days;  Clastocnemis 
quadrimaculatus,  18-22  days;  Platygenia  barbata,  20-24  days;  Gram - 
mopyga  cincticollis,  12-14  days;  Gnathocera  trivittata,  13-15  days;  Heteror¬ 
rhina  smaragdina,  23-26  days. 

In  this  paper  larvae  of  six  species,  Clastocnemis  quadrimaculatus, 
Platygenia  barbata,  Gnathocera  trivittata,  Grammopyga  cincticollis,  Hete¬ 
rorrhina  smaragdina,  and  Pachnoda  marginella  are  described  for  the  first 
time  and  keys  presented  for  their  separation.  Larval  descriptions  of  the  first 
live  genera  have  not  appeared  heretofore.  The  Nigerian  larvae  agree  with 
those  of  British  (Van  Emden,  1941)  and  North  American  (Ritcher,  1945) 
larvae  in  essential  characters. 


1  Agricultural  Research  Station,  Umudike-Umuahia,  Nigeria. 

-  Thanks  are  due  to  Dr.  Paul  O.  Ritcher,  Head  Entomology  Department,  Oregon 
State  University,  U.S.A.  and  Mr.  O.  L.  Cartwright  of  U.S.N.M.  for  going  through 
the  paper  and  making  valuable  suggestions. 


60 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


The  material  studied  for  this  paper  is  in  the  collection  of  the  Entomology 
Department,  Agriculture  Research  Station,  Umudike-Umuahia. 

Cetoniid  larvae  may  be  characterized  as  follows:  Labrum  symmetrical;  antenna 
four  segmented,  first  segment  longest  and  the  third  segment  shortest.  Ocelli  present. 
Clypeus  divided  into  a  small  pre-  and  a  large  post-clypeus.  Mandibles,  each  with  a 
ventral,  oval  stridulatory  structure  consisting  of  transverse  ridges.  Maxillary  stridula- 
tory  teeth  with  anteriorly  directed  sharp  points;  lacinia  of  each  maxilla  with  a 
single  distal  uncus  or  with  two  unequal  distal  unci  fused  at  their  bases.  Epipharynx 
with  a  single  nesium;  plegmata  and  prolegmata  absent;  haptomerum  of  epipharynx 
with  a  conspicuous,  transverse  curved  row  of  closely  placed  stout  setae.  Abdominal 
segments  1-6,  each  with  three  dorsal  annulets;  segments  7  and  8,  each  with  two 
dorsal  annulets;  each  annulet  with  variable  rows  of  setae.  Palidia  present  or  absent. 
Anal  slit  transverse,  often  slightly  curved. 

Key  to  the  Third-stage  Larvae  of  Known  Species  of  Nigerian 

Cetoniinae 

1.  Labrum  entire;  lacinia  of  maxilla  with  one  terminal  uncus;  clithra  absent  (fig.  4); 

claw  falcate  (fig.  9);  raster  without  longitudinal  palidia  (fig.  12) -  2 

Labrum  trilobed;  lacinia  of  maxilla  with  two  terminal  unci  fused  at  their  bases 
(fig.  5);  clithra  present  (fig.  3);  claw  sub-conical  or  cylindrical  and  rounded 
apical ly  (fig.  8);  raster  with  two  longitudinal  palidia  (fig.  13) -  3 

2.  Distal  segment  of  antenna  with  four  sensory  spots;  dorso-epicranial  setae  one  long 

and  one  short  on  each  side  (fig.  1);  ninth  and  tenth  abdominal  segments  not 

fused  dorsal  ly  (fig.  10) - CLASTOCNEMIS  QUADRIMACULATUS 

Distal  segment  of  antenna  with  13-17  sensory  spots;  dorso-epicranial  setae  2  long 
and  a  row  of  7-8  short  on  each  side;  ninth  and  tenth  abdominal  segments  fused 
dorsal  ly - PLATYGENIA  BARBATA 

3.  Claw  cylindrical  and  rounded  apically  with  more  than  8  setae -  4 

Claw  sub-conical  with  six  setae - GNATHOCERA  TR1VITTATA 

4.  Scissorial  area  of  left  mandible  with  S1+2,  S3  and  S4  and  of  right  mandible  with 

S1+2  and  S3+4;  laeotorma  of  epipharynx  divided  and  shaped  like  an  inverted  V; 

each  palidium  of  raster  with  9-11  pali - GRAMMOPYGA  CINCITICOLLIS 

Scissorial  area  of  left  mandible  with  S1(  S2,  S3  and  S4  (fig.  6)  and  of  right  mandible 
with  S1+2;  S3  and  S4  (fig.  7);  laeotorma  of  epipharynx  sub-triangular;  each 
palidium  of  raster  with  12  or  more  pali -  5 

5.  Distal  segment  of  antenna  with  10-11  sensory  spots;  each  palidium  of  raster  with 

12-13  pali - HETERORRHINA  SMARAGDINA 

Distal  segment  of  antenna  with  five  sensory  spots;  each  palidium  of  raster  with 

15-17  pali  (fig.  13) - PACHNODA  MARGIN  ELLA 

Clastocnemis  quadrimaculatus  Afzel 
(Figs.  1,  4,  10  and  12) 

MATERIAL  STUDIED:  Six  third-stage  larvae  and  a  cast  skin  of  a 
third-stage  larva  reared  to  the  adult  stage.  These  larvae,  together  with 
several  others,  were  collected  from  coconut  palms  at  Akwete  on  January 
11,  1962  by  M.  L.  Jerath.  The  reared  adults  were  determined  by  Mr.  R.  D. 
Pope  of  British  Museum,  London. 

Three  third-stage  larvae  associated  with  one  adult  were  collected  from 
coconut  palm  at  Umudike  on  July  24,  1962  by  M.  L.  Jerath. 

DESCRIPTION:  Maximum  width  of  head  capsule  of  third-stage  larva  2.64-3.04 
mm.  Surface  of  cranium  reticulate  and  yellowish-brown  in  color.  Frons,  on  each  side, 
with  a  single  long  posterior  frontal  seta  and  a  single  long  seta  in  anterior  angle; 
other  frontal  setae  absent.  Dorso-epicranial  setae  one  long  and  two  or  three  micro- 
sensillae.  Last  antennal  segment  with  four  sensory  spots.  Clithra  absent.  Scissorial 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


61 


area  of  the  left  mandible  with  S,,  S2,  S3,  and  S,  and  of  the  right  mandible  with  Si+2,  S3 
and  S4.  Lacinia  of  maxilla  with  a  single  terminal  uncus;  maxillary  stridulatory  area 
with  a  row  of  4-5  anteriorly  pointed  teeth  and  a  distal  conical  process. 

Prothoracic  spiracle  0.32-0.36  mm.  long  and  0.20-0.24  mm.  wide.  Spiracles  of 
abdominal  segments  1-7  similar  in  size,  those  of  abdominal  segment  eight  slightly 
smaller. 

Segments  nine  and  ten  separate  dorsally  and  each  segment  with  two  to  three  rows 
of  setae.  Raster  without  palidia.  Teges  consisting  of  numerous,  caudally  directed 
rather  short  flattened  setae,  laterally  interspersed  with  several  very  long  cylindrical 
setae.  Lower  anal  lip  with  scattered  short  flattened  setae  similar  to  those  of  the  teges 
Claws  falcate,  sharp  pointed,  and  each  with  two  short  setae. 

Platygenia  barb  at  a  Afzel 
(Fig.  9) 

MATERIAL  STUDIED:  Three  third-stage  larvae  were  collected  from 
oil  palms  at  Agriculture  Research  Station,  Umudike  by  M.  L.  Jerath.  The 
reared  adults  were  identified  by  Mr.  R.  D.  Pope  of  British  Museum, 
London. 

DESCRIPTION:  Maximum  width  of  head  capsule  of  third-stage  larvae  7.19- 
7.65  mm.  Surface  of  cranium  reticulate  and  reddish-orange  in  color  with  small  brown 
spots.  Frons  bearing  on  each  side,  2  long  and  6-7  short  posterior  frontal  setae,  1  to 
2  long  and  3-4  short  exterior  frontal  setae,  1  to  2  short  anterior  frontal  setae  and  a 
single  long  anterior  frontal  seta.  Dorsoepicranial  setae  9-10  on  each  side,  two  long 
and  the  rest  very  short  and  in  a  row.  Last  antennal  segment  with  13-17  sensory  spots. 
Labrum  entire.  Clithra  absent.  Scissorial  area  of  left  mandible  with  Si+2  and  S3+4* 
and  of  right  mandible  with  Si+2  and  S3+4.  Lacinia  of  maxilla  with  a  single  terminal 
uncus.  Maxillary  stridulatory  area  with  a  row  of  4-6  anteriorly  pointed  teeth  and 
a  distal  conical  process. 

Prothoracic  spiracle  0.96-1.08  mm.  long  and  0.76-0.84  mm.  wide;  spiracles  of 
abdominal  segments  1-7  similar  in  size  and  those  of  segment  eight  slightly  smaller. 

Dorsa  of  segments  nine  and  ten  fused,  but  covered  with  numerous  setae.  Raster 
without  palidia.  Tegillar  setae  scattered  on  the  venter  of  tenth  abdominal  segment 
and  the  lower  anal  lip.  Claws  falcate,  sharp  pointed,  and  each  with  two  short  "setae. 


Gnathocera  trivittata  Swed. 

MATERIAL  STUDIED:  Three  third-stage  larvae  reared  from  the  eggs 
laid  during  January  1962  in  the  laboratory  by  confining  beetles  to  soil  rich 
in  organic  matter.  (No.  U62-5.) 

DESCRIPTION:  Maximum  width  of  the  head  capsule  of  third-stage  larva  2.40- 
2.52  mm.  Surface  of  cranium  smooth  and  light-yellow  in  color.  Frons  with  a 
shallow  median  longitudinal  depression  forked  anteriorly  and  extends  forward  from 
the  epicranial  stem.  Frons  on  each  side,  with  a  single  long  posterior  frontal  seta 
and  a  single  long  seta  in  anterior  angle.  Dorso-epicranial  setae  one  long  and  nine 
short  on  each  side.  Last  antennal  segment  with  7-8  sensory  spots.  Clithra  present. 
Scissorial  area  of  left  mandible  with  Si+2,  S3  and  S4  and  of  right  mandible  with  Si+2 
and  S3+4.  Lacinia  of  maxilla  with  two  terminal  unci  fused  at  their  bases,  dorsal  uncus 
much  the  larger.  Maxillary  stridulatory  area  with  a  row  of  six  to  eight  stridulatory 
teeth  pointing  anteriorly  and  a  small  distal  conical  process. 

Prothoracic  spiracle  .38-.32  mm.  long  and  0.28-0.22  mm.  wide.  Spiracle  of  ab¬ 
dominal  segments  1-7  similar.  Those  of  abdominal  segment  8  slightly  smaller. 

Dorsa  of  abdominal  segments  nine  and  ten  fused  and  covered  with  numerous  short 


62 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


and  long  setae.  Raster  with  a  pair  of  palidia  and  a  pair  of  tegilla.  Each  palidium 
is  a  row  of  11-13  stout  blunt  pali.  The  palidia  being  almost  parallel.  Septula  narrow, 
about  four  times  longer  than  broad.  Tegilla  composed  of  short  to  long  straight  sharp 
pointed  setae  united  anterior  to  palidia;  lower  anal  lip  with  tegilla  setae.  Claw  sub- 
conical,  bearing  6  stout  setae. 

Grammopyga  cincticollis  Hope 

MATERIAL  STUDIED:  Several  third-stage  larvae  were  collected  from 
decaying  raphia  palm  trees  at  Umudike  on  January  4,  1963  by  M.  L. 
Jerath.  The  associated  adults  were  determined  by  Mr.  R.  D.  Pope  of 
British  Museum,  London. 

Three  third-stage  larvae  and  cast  skins  of  two  larvae  were  reared  to  the 
adult  stage.  Larvae  were  collected  from  decaying  oil  palm  trees  at  Umudike 
on  June  21,  1963  by  B.  O.  Bassey. 

DESCRIPTION:  Maximum  width  of  head  capsule  of  third  stage  larva  2.90-2.96 
mm.  Surface  of  cranium  smooth  and  yellowish-brown  in  color.  Frons  with  a  shallow 
median  longitudinal  depression  forked  anteriorly  and  extending  from  the  epicranial 
stem.  Frons  on  each  side,  with  a  single  long  posterior  frontal  seta  and  a  single  long 
seta  in  anterior  angle.  Dorso-epicranial  seta  one  on  each  side  with  1-2  microsensillae. 
Last  antennal  segment  with  four  sensory  spots.  Clithra  present.  Scissorial  area  of  left 
mandible  with  S1+2,  S3  and  S4  and  of  right  mandible  with  S1+2  and  S3+4.  Lacinia  of 
maxilla  with  two  terminal  unci  fused  at  their  bases,  dorsal  uncus  larger.  Maxillary 
stridulatory  area  with  a  row  of  7-8  stridulatory  teeth  pointing  anteriorly  and  a 
distal  conical  process. 

Prothoracic  spiracle  .36-. 44  mm.  long  and  .32-. 28  mm.  wide.  Spiracles  of  ab¬ 
dominal  segments  1  to  8  similar  in  size. 

Dorsa  of  abdominal  segments  nine  and  ten  fused  but  covered  with  numerous 
short  setae.  Raster  with  a  pair  of  palidia  and  a  pair  of  tegilla.  Each  palidium  con¬ 
sists  of  a  single  close-set  row  of  9-11  rather  stout  blunt  pali.  The  two  palidia  join 
anteriorly  and  are  parallel  posteriorly  or  slightly  diverging.  Tegilla  composed  of  short 
to  long  straight  sharp  pointed  setae  united  anterior  to  palidia.  Lower  anal  lip  with 
tegillar  setaerciaw  cylindrical,  rounded  apically  and  bearing  8-9  short  setae. 

Heterorrhina  sniaragdina  Voet 

MATERIAL  STUDIED:  Three  third-stage  larvae  and  a  cast  skin  of  one 
third-stage  larva  were  reared  to  the  adult  stage,  collected  from  decaying 
part  of  " Kola  nitida  tree  at  Agriculture  Research  Station,  Umudike  by 
M.  L.  Jerath  on  March  29,  1961. 

DESCRIPTION:  Maximum  width  of  head  capsule  of  third-stage  larva  3.60-3.68 
mm.  Surface  of  cranium  smooth  and  yellowish-brown  in  color.  Frons  on  each  side, 
with  one  long  posterior  frontal  seta  and  a  long  seta  in  anterior  angle,  other  frontal 
setae  absent.  Dorsoepicranial  setae,  one  long  and  2-3  short  on  each  side.  Last 
antennal  segment  with  9-11  sensory  spots.  Clithra  present.  Scissorial  area  of  left 
mandible  with  Si,  S2,  S3  and  S4  and  of  right  mandible  with  S1+2,  S3  and  S4.  Lacinia 
of  maxilla  with  two  terminal  unci,  fused  at  their  bases,  dorsal  uncus  larger.  Maxillary 
stridulatory  area  with  five  maxillary  teeth  pointing  anteriorly  and  a  distal  conical 
process. 

Prothoracic  spiracle  .48-.52  mm.  long  and  .32-.36  mm.  wide.  Spiracles  of  abdominal 
segments  1-7  similar  in  size  but  those  of  abdominal  segment  8  slightly  smaller. 

Dorsa  of  abdominal  segments  nine  and  ten  fused,  but  covered  with  numerous 
short  and  long  setae.  Raster  with  a  pair  of  palidia  and  a  pair  of  tegilla.  Each  palidium 
consists  of  a  single  row  of  12-13  stout  and  blunt  pali,  the  two  palidia  join  anteriorly 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


63 


and  are  parallel  posteriorly.  Septula  about  three  times  longer  than  broad.  Tegilla 
composed  of  short  to  long  straight  sharp  pointed  setae  united  anterior  to  palidia; 
lower  anal  lip  with  tegillar  setae.  Claw  cylindrical,  rounded  apically,  bearing  14-15 
short  setae. 


Pachnoda  marginella  F. 
(Figs.  2,  3,  5-8,  11  and  13) 


MA  I  TRIAL  STUDIED:  Ten  third-stage  larvae  and  the  cast  skins  of  five 
third-stage  larvae  were  reared  to  the  adult  stage.  These  larvae,  together  with 
several  others,  were  collected  from  decaying  raphia  palms  at  Umudike,  on 
July  6,  1962.  The  reared  adults  were  determined  by  Mr.  R.  D.  Pope  of 
British  Museum,  London. 

DESCRIPTION:  Maximum  width  of  the  third-stage  larva  4.43-4.74  mm.  Surface 
of  cranium  smooth,  faintly  reticulate  and  orange  brown  in  color.  Frons  with  a 
shallow  median,  longitudinal  depression  which  is  forked  anteriorly  and  extends  for¬ 
ward  from  the  epicranial  stem.  Frons  on  each  side,  with  a  single  long  posterior 
frontal  seta  and  a  single  long  seta  in  the  anterior  angle;  other  frontal  setae  absent. 
Dorso-epicranial  setae  one  long  and  8  to  9  short  on  each  side.  Last  antennal  seg¬ 
ment  with  five  sensory  spots.  Clithra  present.  Scissorial  area  of  left  mandible  with 
Si,  S„,  S:1  and  S*  and  of  right  mandible  with  S1+2,  S3  and  Si.  Lacinia  of  maxilla  with 
two  terminal  unci  fused  at  their  bases,  dorsal  uncus  much  the  larger.  Maxillary 
stridulatory  teeth  pointing  anteriorly  and  a  small  distal  conical  process. 

Prothoracic  spiracle  0.80-0.84  mm.  in  length  and  0.56-0.64  mm.  in  width.  Ab¬ 
dominal  spiracles  similar  in  size. 

Dorsa  of  abdominal  segments  nine  and  ten  fused  and  covered  with  numerous 
short  and  long  setae.  Raster  with  a  pair  of  longitudinal  palidia;  each  palidium  set 
with  15-17  short,  stout  pali,  septula  elongate  to  sub-elliptical;  tegilla  composed  of 
numerous  short  and  long  straight  sharp  pointed  setae  united  anteriorly  to  the 
palidia.  Lower  anal  lip  with  numerous  short  setae.  Claw  cylindrical,  rounded  apically, 
each  with  14-15  setae  borne  on  the  sides  and  near  the  end  of  the  claw. 

The  larvae  of  P.  marginella  can  be  separated  from  the  larva  of  P.  im- 
pressa  (Oberholzer,  1959)  as  follows: 


Raster  with  15-17  pali  in  each  palidium;  claw  with  14-15  setae - MARGINELLA 

Raster  with  17-20  pali  in  each  palidium;  claw  with  6-8  setae - IMPRESSA 


Literature  Cited 


B0ving,  A.  G.  and  F.  C.  Craighead 

1931.  An  illustrated  synopsis  of  the  principal  larval  forms  of  the  order 
Coleoptera.  Ent.  Amer.  11:1-351,  illus. 

Hayes,  W.  P. 

1928.  The  epipharynx  of  lamellicorn  larvae  (Coleoptera)  with  a  key  to  com¬ 
mon  genera.  Ann.  Ent.  Soc.  Amer.  21(2)  :282-306,  illus. 

1929.  Morphology,  taxonomy  and  biology  of  larval  Scarabaeidae.  Illinois  Biol. 
Monog.  12(2)1-119,  illus. 

Oberholzer,  J.  J. 

1959.  A  morphological  study  of  some  South  African  lamellicorn  larvae.  South 
African  Jour.  Agric.  Sci.  2(1)  :4 1-77. 


64 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


RlTCHER,  P.  O. 

1945.  North  American  Cetoniinae  with  descriptions  of  larvae  and  keys  to 
genera  and  species  (Coleoptera:  Scarabaeidae).  Kentucky  Agric.  Exp.  Sta. 
Bull.  476:1-39. 

1958.  Biology  of  Scarabaeidae.  Ann.  Rev.  Ent.  3:311-334. 

Van  Emden,  F.  I. 

Larvae  of  British  beetles.  II.  A  key  to  the  British  Lamellicornia  larvae. 
Ent.  Mo.  Mag.  77:117-127,  181-192,  illus. 


Figures  1-13,  Larvae  of  Cetoniinae. 

Clastocnemis  quadrimaculatus.  1— Head  capsule.  4 — Epipharynx.  10 — Lateral  view 
of  8th  to  10th  abdominal  segments.  12 — Raster. 

Pachnoda  marginella.  2— Last  antennal  segment.  3— Epipharynx.  5— Maxilla, 
ventral  view.  6 — Left  mandible,  dorsal  view.  7 — Right  mandible,  dorsal  view.  8 — 
Claw,  ii — Lateral  view  of  8th  to  10th  abdominal  segment.  13 — Raster. 

Platygenia  barbata.  9 — Claw. 

Symbols.  AA — Seta  of  anterior  angle  of  frons.  ACP — Acanthoparia.  AFS — An¬ 
terior  frontal  seta.  ASL — Anal  slit.  C — Clithrum.  CL — Claw.  CR — Crepis.  DES  ■ 
Dorso  epicranial  setae.  DX — Dexiotorma.  ES — Epicranial  stem.  FS — Frontal  suture. 
GU — Uncus  of  galea.  LAL — Lower  anal  lip.  LT — Laeotorma.  LU — Uncus  of  lacinia. 

O Ocellus.  PC — Preclypeus.  PE — Pedium.  PFS — Posterior  frontal  seta.  PLA — 

Palidium.  PSC — Postclypeus.  S — Scissorial  teeth.  SE — Septula.  SC — Sense  cone. 
SN — Scissorial  notch.  T — Teges. 


-BACK  ISSUES— 


The  Coleopterists'  Bulletin 


Per 

Single 

Volume 

Issue 

Vol.  3,  1949,  6  issues 

(Nos.  1  &  2  o.p.)  $5.00 

$1.00 

Vol.  4,  1950,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol.  5,  1951,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol.  6,  1952,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol.  7,  1953,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol.  8,  1954,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol.  9,  1955,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol.  10,  1956,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol.  11,  1957,  2  issues 

5.00 

3.00 

Vol.  12,  1958,  1  issue 

5.00 

5.00 

Vol.  13,  1959,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol.  14,  1960,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol.  15,  1961,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol.  16,  1962,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol.  17,  1963,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

(above  prices  Postpaid) 


. ATTENTION  READERS! . 

From  time  to  time  we  receive  requests  from  our  subscribers  who 
wish  to  complete  their  holdings  of  the  Bulletin.  We  would  appre¬ 
ciate  it  if  any  readers  possessing  copies  of  Vol.  3,  No.  1,  with  which 
they  are  willing  to  part,  would  inform  the  Bulletin . 


★ 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 

620  Michigan  Avenue,  N.E. 
Washington,  D.  C.  20017 


Send  today  for  your  copy  of — 

“PYGMIES  AND  PYGMOIDS: 
TWIDES  OF  TROPICAL  AFRICA” 

BY 

Martin  Gusinde,  S.V.D. 

JANUARY  1955  ISSUE  OF 
ANTHROPOLOGICAL  QUARTERLY 

•  This  interesting  and  educational  article  is 
based  on  the  author’s  original  observations, 
and  includes  a  complete  bibliography  on  the 
“PYGMIES.” 

Price:  $1.00  Postpaid 
Anthropological  Quarterly 
620  Michigan  Avenue,  N.E.,  Washington,  D.  C.  20017 


Now  in  its  38th  year — 

Anthropological  Quarterly 

(formerly  Primitive  Man) 

Issued  January,  April,  July  and  October 

<r*o 

Some  Recent  Contents: 

Grasshoppers  as  Food  in  Buhaya . . P.  O.  Mors 

A  Pygmy  Group  Newly  Discovered  in  New  Guinea  Martin  Gusinde 

Eskimo  Reindeer  Herding . Robert  T.  Anderson 

Rock  Paintings  of  South  Africa . Abbe  Henri  Breuil 

The  Assinboin  Horse  Medicine  Cult . John  C.  Ewers 

Treatment  of  Disease  in  the  New  Guinea  Highlands 

Louis  J.  Luzbetak 

(Articles  on  Physical  and  Cultural  Anthropology) 

Subscription  Price  $4.00  a  year  Single  Issues  $1.00 

Anthropological  Quarterly 

620  Michigan  Ave.,  N.E.  Washington,  D.  C.  20017 


6 


THE 


W 


\ 


il 


// 


/*■--• 


COLEOPTERISTS 


BULLETIN 


/: 


*!  U 


VOLUME  19  SEPTEMBER  /  (No.  3)  1965 

j.a  -  —  —  OCT  2  5  1865 

Library 

CARABIDAE:  New  Sphodrine,  Z>y  Barr .  55 

SCARAB AEIDAE:  Aphodius  larvae,  by  Jerath  &  Unny  91 

STAPHYLINIDAE:  Orus  II,  fry  Herman .  73 

Beetle  Talk  . 

Literature  Notice .  72  95 

Notice  .  22 

THE  CATHOLIC  UNIVERSITY  OF  AMERICA  PRESS 

WASHINGTON,  D.C.  20017  ^ 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS’  BULLETIN 

Founded  1947  by  Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr. 


The  Coleopterists*  Bulletin  is  published  by  The  Catholic  University  of  America 
Press,  Washington,  D.  C.  20017  and  edited  by  T.  J.  Spilman.  It  is  issued  four  times  a 
year  beginning  with  March.  All  business  matters  should  be  addressed  to  The  Cole- 
opterists’  Bulletin  at  the  Press.  Manuscripts  and  other  editorial  matter  should  be 
addressed  to  the  editor,  U.  S.  National  Museum,  Washington,  D.  C.  20560. 


Subscriptions:  The  subscription  price  for 
each  annual  volume  of  four  numbers  is 
$5.00  payable  in  advance.  All  sub¬ 
scriptions  begin  with  the  first  issue  of 
the  year  and  those  subscribing  later  in 
the  year  will  receive  the  back  issues  of 
the  volume. 


Back  volumes:  A  stock  of  back  volumes 
is  maintained  and  may  be  purchased  as 
follows:  3  to  date,  $5.00  ea.;  single  num¬ 
bers,  $1.25  each;  all  prices  postpaid. 
Missing  numbers:  Issues  lost  in  the  mail 
will  be  supplied  free  of  charge  if  notified 
within  three  months  after  mailing. 


EDITORIAL  BOARD 


Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr.,  Ph.D. 

Department  of  Biology 
Catholic  University  of  America 

O.  L.  Cartwright 

U.  S.  National  Museum 
Washington,  D.  C.  20560 

Eugene  J.  Gerberg,  Ph.D. 

Insect  Control  and  Research,  Inc. 
Baltimore,  Md. 


James  A.  Magner,  Ph.D.,  S.T.D 

Business  Manager  of  the  Bulletin 
Catholic  University  of  America 

Theodore  J.  Spilman 

U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture 
Washington,  D.  C.  20560 

Eileen  R.  Van  Tassell 

Department  of  Biology 
Catholic  University  of  America 


NOTICE  TO  AUTHORS 


Manuscripts  will  be  considered  ONLY 
FROM  SUBSCRIBERS.  Authors  should 
consult  STYLE  MANUAL  FOR  BIO¬ 
LOGICAL  JOURNALS,  prepared  by  the 
Committee  on  Form  and  Style  of  the  Con¬ 
ference  of  Biological  Editors,  and  pub¬ 
lished  by  the  American  Institute  of  Bio¬ 
logical  Sciences,  2000  P  St.,  N.W.,  Wash¬ 
ington,  D.  C.  20006.  The  Bulletin  requires 
that  all  manuscripts  be  prepared  according 
to  instructions  in  the  Style  Manual.  Illus¬ 
trations  should  be  sent  mounted,  and 
numbered.  The  manuscript  should  be 
marked  to  indicate  the  location  of  text 
figures  or  the  position  of  full  page  plates. 

Manuscripts  will  be  acknowledged  upon 
receipt.  As  soon  as  possible  thereafter  the 
author  will  be  notified  as  to  acceptance 
after  review  by  the  Editorial  Board.  If 
the  manuscript  is  accepted,  a  tentative 
date  of  publication  will  be  set.  In  general, 


all  papers  will  be  published  in  their  order 
of  receipt,  but  the  editor  reserves  the  right 
to  use  articles  out  of  order  in  the  interest 
of  a  balanced  magazine. 

The  editor  will  make  no  text  changes 
without  advanced  notice  to  the  author. 
Galley  proof  will  be  sent  for  correction. 
These  galleys  are  sent  out  well  in  advance 
and  do  NOT  indicate  the  date  or  order  of 
publication. 

Twenty-five  tear  sheets  of  one  page 
notes  will  be  supplied  free  to  the  author  if 
requested  when  returning  galley  proofs. 
Reprints  of  articles  printed  free  of  extrane¬ 
ous  matter  will  be  supplied  with  or  with¬ 
out  covers  at  cost.  Reprints  MUST  be 
ordered  on  the  form  provided  when  re¬ 
turning  galley  proofs.  The  approximate 
cost  of  reprints  will  be  supplied  with  this 
form. 


EDITORIAL  POLICY 

Any  article,  note,  or  news  items  likely  cases,  descriptions  of  new  species  must  be 
to  be  of  interest  to  readers  of  the  Bulletin  illustrated.  Descriptions  of  new  species  or 
will  be  considered.  Articles  with  illustra-  genera  MUST  contain  keys  or  be  corre- 
tions  are  particularly  desired,  and  in  all  lated  with  existing  keys. 


A  QUARTERLY  PUBLICATION  DEVOTED  TO  THE  STUDY  OF  BEETLES 


The  Coleopterists’  Bulletin 

■ 

Volume  19  September  (No.  3)  1965 


A  NEW  CAVERNICOLOUS  SPHODRINE  FROM  VERA¬ 
CRUZ,  MEXICO 

j  (COLEOPTERA:  CARABIDAE)1 

By  Thomas  C.  Barr,  Jr.2>  3 

The  sphodrines  are  a  group  of  carabid  genera  which  are  usually  given 
tribal  status  in  the  subfamily  Anchomeninae  (e.g.,  Britton  1959)  or  sub- 
tribal  status  within  the  Agonini  (=Anchomenini)  of  more  restrictive 
classifications  (e.g.,  Lindroth  1956).  The  best  generic  treatment  of  the 
group  is  that  of  Jeannel  (1937).  A  distinction  is  sometimes  made  between 
Calathus  and  associated  genera  ( Calathus  group  of  Jeannel,  op.  cit .)  and 
the  “true"'  sphodrines  ( Sphodrus  and  Laemosthenes  groups  of  Jeannel). 
Sphodrines  are  distinguished  from  other  Agonini  by  the  squarely  truncate 
base  of  the  intercoxal  process  of  the  prosternum  and  (usually)  by  the 
elongate,  slender  (“styloid”)  right  paramere  of  the  aedeagus.  In  Calathus 
and  other  genera  of  the  Calathus  group,  the  hind  angles  of  the  pronotum 
are  decidedly  rounded  and  the  claws  are  strongly  pectinate.  Lindroth 
(1956)  made  several  minor  changes  in  classification  of  sphodrines,  espe¬ 
cially  of  the  Calathus  group,  separating  the  subtribe  Sphodri  (=Sphodrina) 
from  the  Agoni  (=Agonina)  on  the  basis  of  the  styloid  right  paramere. 
In  Agonina  the  right  paramere  is  conchoidal,  similar  to  the  left  one  but 
smaller.  However,  the  right  paramere  is  conchoidal  in  Prosphodrus  Britton 
(1959)  and  in  the  genus  described  below,  both  of  which  should  be  placed 
among  the  true  sphodrines  because  of  other  characters. 

The  “true”  sphodrines  range  in  size  about  10-20  mm.  and  are  pre¬ 
dominantly  black,  ferrugineous,  or  rufotestaceous  (a  few  species  are  dark 
violet).  They  are  lucifugous  and  nocturnal,  occurring  in  cellars,  mammal 
burrows,  caves,  and  other  dark,  cool  microenvironments.  Some  species  are 


1  This  study  was  supported  in  part  by  a  grant  from  the  National  Science  Founda¬ 
tion  (G-B  201 1 ). 

-  Department  of  Zoology,  University  of  Kentucky,  Lexington. 

*  Acknowledgments:  I  am  indebted  to  T.  W.  Raines  and  W.  D.  Bell  for  collecting 
the  species  described  in  this  paper  and  to  J.  R.  Reddell  for  forwarding  it  to  me  for 
study.  Doctor  P.  J.  Darlington,  Jr.,  Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology,  Harvard 
University,  lent  me  an  excellent  synoptic  collection  of  European  sphodrines  from  the 
Museum,  and  also  provided  photo-copies  of  reference  material  not  otherwise  readily 
available.  Mrs.  Brenda  M.  May,  Plant  Diseases  Division,  DSIR,  Auckland,  New 
Zealand,  kindly  sent  me  a  specimen  of  Prosphodrus  waltoni.  Consequently  I  have 
been  able  to  compare  the  new  genus  with  Antisphodrus  Schauf.,  Ceutho sphodrus 
Jeann.,  Cryptotrichus  Schauf.,  Laemosthenes  Bon.,  Pristonychus  Dej.,  Prosphodrus 
Britt.,  Sphodropsis  Seidl.,  Sphodrus  Clairv.,  and  Taphoxenus  Motsch. 


66 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


apterous  and  a  few  are  microphthalmous,  although  the  eyes  seem  to  be 
always  faceted  and  are  probably  more  or  less  functional.  Cavernicole 
species  occur  in  the  genera  Sphodropsis,  Antisphodrus,  Ceuthosphodrus, 
and  Prosphodrus. 

The  known  distribution  of  the  “true”  sphodrines  was,  until  recently, 
strictly  Palaearctic,  from  Mongolia  to  Spain,  North  Africa,  and  the  Canary 
Islands.  The  discovery  of  Prosphodrus  by  Brenda  May  in  caves  of  New 
Zealand  (Britton  1959)  extended  the  range  of  the  group  into  the  southern 
hemisphere.  The  recently  described  cavernicole  species  of  Jujiroa  and  the 
monobasic  Jaana  from  Japan  were  shown  by  Ueno  (1955)  to  be  Agonina 
rather  than  Sphodrina.  The  sphodroid  Rhadine  spp.  of  southern  United 
States  and  northern  Mexico  (Barr  1960;  Bolivar  and  Hendrichs  1964) 
are  clearly  Agonina. 

In  July,  1964,  Mr.  James  R.  Reddell  sent  me  a  series  of  carabids  from 
caves  in  northeastern  Mexico.  In  this  material  were  3  specimens  of  a 
wholly  new  and  undescribed  true  sphodrine  from  a  deep  pit  in  the  karst 
region  south  of  Orizaba,  in  the  state  of  Veracruz.  This  remarkable  species, 
the  type  of  a  new  and  distinctive  genus,  is  described  below. 

Mexisphodrus  Barr,  NEW  GENUS 

Sphodrina  of  large  size,  slender,  depigmented,  apterous,  microphthalmous.  Antenna 
with  pubescence  beginning  on  distal  two-thirds  of  segment  IV.  Pronotum  subquadrate, 
the  margins  sinuate  and  the  hind  angles  prominent  and  sharp.  Prosternum  with 
intercoxal  process  compressed  into  a  vertical,  abruptly  truncate  ridge.  Elytra  elon¬ 
gate,  depressed,  broadly  margined,  with  3  or  4  minute  discal  punctures  on  each 
elytron.  Mesosternum  without  distinct  antecoxal  tooth.  Metatrochanters  with  apex 
bluntly  rounded.  Metepisterna  not  unusually  elongate.  Tarsi  completely  glabrous 
above,  with  a  distinct  lateral  carina  on  each  side  and  heavily  pubescent  beneath;  4th 
tarsomere  deeply  bilobate;  claws  simple,  neither  serrate  nor  toothed.  Protarsi  of  male 
slightly  enlarged,  with  two  rows  of  small,  adhesive  brush  hairs  beneath.  Profemur 
without  a  crest  or  tooth  beneath.  Metatibia  without  a  distinct  setose  brush,  but 
densely  covered  with  short  spines  in  apical  half.  Penis  with  basal  bulb  not  appre¬ 
ciably  swollen  nor  deflexed;  apical  orifice  slightly  to  right  of  center;  left  paramere 
conchoidal,  larger  than  right;  right  paramere  conchoidal,  about  as  long  as  left  and 
one-third  as  wide.  Type-species:  M.  veraecrucis  Barr,  sp.  nov. 

Mexisphodrus  veraecrucis  Barr,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Fig.  1) 

Length  16.8-18.1  mm.  Body  form  elongate  and  slender;  dark  ferrugineous  to 
rufotestaceous;  head  and  pronotum  polished,  shining,  elytra  alutaceous.  Microsculp¬ 
ture  of  head,  pronotum,  and  venter  a  shallowly  incised,  transverse  meshwork;  elytral 
microsculpture  a  closely  spaced  isodiametric  meshwork.  Head  1.6  times  longer  than 
wide  (length/width);  labrum  rectangular,  0.56  times  as  long  as  wide;  clypeus  with 
a  seta  on  each  side;  2  pairs  of  supraorbital  setae;  frontal  grooves  broad  and  shallow; 
with  an  irregular,  narrow  groove  from  base  of  antenna  to  anterior  supraorbital  seta, 
then  curving  down  in  back  of  eye;  eye  small  (about  0.60  x  0.45  mm.),  flat,  oblong, 
unpigmented,  but  faceted  (about  300-400  facets  present);  mandibles,  galeae,  and 
laciniae  long  and  slender;  maxillary  palps  glabrous,  lengths  of  segments  II,  III,  and 
TV  in  ratio  13:11:10,  segment  IV  fusiform  with  diameter  0.25  its  length  and  with 
apex  evenly  rounded;  labial  palps  with  segments  III  and  IV  subequal  (each  about 
as  long  as  segment  III  of  maxillary  palp),  glabrous,  III  bearing  2  long  setae  on 
anterior  face,  IV  fusiform  with  diameter  0.19  length  and  with  apex  evenly  rounded; 
glossa  triangular,  with  3  or  4  setae  on  anterior  margin;  paraglossae  a  little  longer 
than  glossa,  hyaline,  in  form  of  oblique,  tapered,  truncate  rods;  mentum  deeply 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


67 


Figure  1,  Mexisphodrus  veraecrucis  sp.  nov.,  holotype  $  ,  Sotano  del  Profesor, 
Veracruz,  Mexico. 


68 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


emarginate,  with  short,  bifid  (grooved)  tooth,  2  setae,  and  2  small,  forameniform 
punctures  in  shallow  fossae;  submentum  with  4  setae.  Pronotum  subquadrate;  length 
and  maximum  width  subequal;  apical  width,  maximum  width,  and  basal  width  in 
ratio  12:17:14;  margin  broadly  reflexed,  disc  feebly  convex;  anterior  angles  salient 
and  rounded;  posterior  angles  large,  sharp,  and  rectangular;  margin  slightly  curved 
in  apical  two-thirds,  then  shallowly  sinuate  to  hind  angles;  with  pair  of  marginal 
setae  at  apical  one-third  and  pair  in  hind  angles;  antebasal  foveae  broad  and  deep. 
Intercoxal  process  of  prosternum  abruptly  truncate.  Elytra  elongate-elliptic  (length/ 
widths  1:80);  humeri  prominent  but  rounded,  the  marginal  bead  terminating  at 
base  of  3rd  stria;  margin  not  sinuate  but  simply  oblique  near  apex;  apices  separately 
produced  and  slightly  dehiscent,  acuminate;  disc  subconvex,  bilaterally  deplanate 
near  the  base;  longitudinal  striae  finely  impressed  and  regular,  intervals  flat;  scutellar 
stria  short,  and  small  scutellar  puncture  present;  disc  with  3  setiferous  punctures, 
all  small  and  inconspicuous,  2  on  2nd  stria  and  an  anterior  one  on  3rd  stria;  one 
puncture  at  apex  of  6th  stria  and  2  small  punctures  near  apex;  20-21  punctures  on 
9th  interval  bearing  rather  short  macrosetae  of  variable  length,  longer  setae  on  5, 
14/15,  and  20.  Metathoracic  wings  absent,  without  even  a  vestige  remaining.  Meta¬ 
trochanters  with  apex  rounded,  not  acuminate.  Mesosternum  with  a  low,  oblique 
ridge  anterolateral  to  each  mesocoxa.  Metepisterna  rather  short.  Antennae  long  and 
slender,  0.6  total  body  length;  pubescence  beginning  on  segment  IV;  segment  II  0.6 
length  of  scape,  segment  III  1.3  length  of  scape,  segment  IV  slightly  shorter  than  III. 
Tarsi  glabrous  and  smooth  above  and  heavily  pubescent  beneath,  with  a  single  carina 
on  each  side;  claws  long  and  slender  but  not  serrate  and  with  no  trace  of  basal 
tooth;  segment  IV  deeply  bilobate  with  long  tufts  of  setae  beneath  each  lobe;  male 
protarsi  slightly  enlarged,  with  small  adhesive  hairs  beneath,  arranged  in  2  rows. 
Legs  long  and  slender;  femora  without  crests,  crenulations,  or  teeth  of  any  sort,  but 
with  a  few  scattered  macrosetae  which  are  not  arranged  in  well-defined  rows;  meta¬ 
tibia  without  subapical  brush  of  fine  setae  on  inner  face,  but  with  a  dense  subapical 
armature  of  small  spines,  especially  thick  on  internal  face.  Aedeagus  (figs.  2-3) 


2 


3 


Figures  2-3,  Aedeagus  of  Mexisphodrus  veraecrucis,  holotype;  length  3.3  mm. 
2 — Left  lateral  view.  3 — Ventral  view. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


69 


small  (0.18  total  body  length  in  holotype)  and  slender;  basal  bulb  only  slightly 
larger  than  diameter  of  middle  portion  of  penis;  apex  attenuate,  the  apical  orifice 
displaced  very  slightly  to  the  right  of  center;  left  paramere  large  and  conchoid; 
right  paramere  subequal  in  length  but  only  one-third  as  wide,  conchoid  with 
narrowed  apex,  not  at  all  styloid  and  elongate  as  usual  for  the  subtribe. 

Holotype  $  and  2  $  $  paratypes,  Sotano  del  Profesor,  near  Tequila, 
Veracruz,  Mexico,  2  June  1964  (Terry  W.  Raines  and  William  D.  Bell, 
111).  Holotype  deposited  in  Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology,  Harvard 
University,  Cambridge,  Massachusetts;  one  paratype  in  the  collection  of 
Dr.  C.  Bolivar  y  Pieltain,  Escuela  Nacional  de  Ciencias  Biologicas,  I.  P.  N., 
Mexico,  D.  F.,  Mexico;  remaining  paratype  in  author’s  collection.  Measure¬ 
ments  of  holotype  (a  late  teneral):  total  length  18.1  mm.;  head  length 
3.2  mm.,  width  2.0  mm.;  pronotum  length  3.4  mm.,  width  3.4  mm.,  apical 
width  2.4  mm.,  basal  width  2.8  mm.;  elytra  length  10.0  mm.,  width  5.5 
mm.;  antenna  length  10.6  mm.;  eye  length  0.60  mm.,  width  0.45  mm.; 
metatibia  length  5.7  mm.;  metatarsus  length  4.5  mm.,  lengths  of  segments 
1-V  with  ratio  15:8:6:4;  15;  aedeagus  length  3.3  mm. 

The  type  locality  is  described  as  follows  by  Mr.  Terry  Raines  (in  litt., 
Nov.,  1964):  “Sotano  del  Profesor  is  located  some  30  feet  from  the 
Orizaba — Tequila  road  about  1  mile  from  Tequila.  The  entrance  is  15  feet 
in  diameter  with  the  pit  keeping  this  same  dimension  to  its  bottom,  354 
feet  below.  No  water  runs  into  the  cave  and  there  are  no  streams  in  the 
area.  The  floor  of  the  pit  is  composed  of  reddish-brown  surface  soil  that 
has  been  washed  in  and  many  small  rocks.  Over  this  a  layer  of  leaves, 
small  sticks,  and  branches  has  recently  fallen  in.  The  walls  and  floor  are 
moist  but  throughout  the  sotano  there  is  no  water,  running  or  otherwise 
.  .  .  the  beetles  I  found  on  the  floor.”  The  pit  is  locally  infamous  for  the 
death  of  a  schoolteacher  who  fell  into  it  in  the  spring  of  1964.  Although 
Mr.  Raines,  Mr.  Reddell,  and  their  associates  have  collected  carabids  in 
several  other  caves  in  the  vicinity  of  Tequila,  no  other  specimens  of 
Mexisphodrus  have  yet  been  taken. 

Mexisphodrus  will  key  out  near  Sphodropsis  in  the  generic  key  given  by 
Jeannel  (1937),  because  the  tarsi  are  glabrous  above,  the  metatrochanters 
are  bluntly  rounded,  there  are  no  mesosternal  teeth,  the  first  metatarso- 
meres  are  pubescent  beneath,  and  there  is  no  metatibial  brush.  It  is  readily 
distinguishable  from  Sphodropsis,  however,  because  the  tarsi  are  simply 
carinate  on  the  sides  instead  of  being  wrinkled  uniformly  above,  the  4th 
tarsomeres  are  deeply  bilobate,  the  metatibiae  are  densely  spinose  and 
setose  in  the  apical  two-thirds,  and  the  right  paramere  of  the  aedeagus  is 
not  styloid. 

In  his  short  but  very  useful  paper  of  1937,  Jeannel  arranged  the  true 
sphodrines  in  a  Sphodrus  group  and  a  Laemosthenes  group,  distinguished 
by  the  tarsi  being  glabrous  or  hairy  above,  respectively.  Apparently  he 
did  not  consider  these  natural  groups,  because  in  the  brief  zoogeographic 
sketch  at  the  end  of  the  paper  (Jeannel  1937:100),  he  established  two 
phyletic  lines  on  the  basis  of  whether  or  not  their  constituent  genera 
possess  a  subapical  brush  of  setae  on  the  metatibiae.  This  is  a  rather 
variable  character,  even  within  a  genus.  An  examination  of  the  literature 
and  of  the  specimens  of  Sphodrina  available  to  me  suggests  no  wholly 


70 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


objective  means  to  assess  the  phylogenetic  weight  of  the  various  characters 
which,  in  different  combinations,  can  be  used  to  demarcate  genera.  Conse¬ 
quently  I  have  adopted  the  following  approach.  This  procedure  does  not 
give  unequivocal  answers  if  it  is  used  to  construct  a  phylogeny  of  the 
whole  group,  but  it  does  prove  revealing  in  the  less  ambitious  task  of  learn¬ 
ing  something  about  the  relative  position  of  Prosphodrus  and  Mexisphodrus. 

Table  1  lists  10  more  or  less  diagnostic  (for  sphodrines)  characters 
and  their  opposites.  It  is  neither  particularly  difficult  nor  arbitrary  to 
determine  which  are  primitive  and  which  are  derivative.  When  in  doubt 
I  have  guessed  by  the  following  rule  of  thumb:  if  a  given  character  occurs 
in  the  majority  of  the  Agonina,  the  most  generalized  of  the  subtribes  of 
Agonini,  I  have  placed  it  in  the  “Primitive”  column.  Table  2  lists  genera 
of  “true”  sphodrines  (following  the  scheme  of  Jeannel).  For  each  primitive 
character  I  have  assigned  a  —  sign,  and  for  each  derivative  character  a  -f- 
sign.  The  total  number  of  -f-  signs  per  genus  is  thus  a  crude  measure  of  the 
degree  of  departure  from  a  primitive  condition. 

Table  2  indicates  that  Sphodrus,  Eremosphodrus,  Cryptotrichus,  and 
Pristonychus  are  the  most  highly  differentiated  genera.  The  two  most 
primitive  genera  are  the  two  geographically  remote  relicts — Prosphodrus 
in  New  Zealand  and  Mexisphodrus  in  Mexico — both  of  which  have  no 
-f-  marks. 

Both  Prosphodrus  and  Mexisphodrus  are  cavernicoles.  The  former  is 
comparatively  robust,  superficially  rather  like  Sphodrus,  but  with  far  fewer 
macrosetae  on  the  legs.  P.  waltoni  is  known  only  from  deep  parts  of  caves 
and  is  quite  rare,  a  total  of  only  7  specimens  having  been  taken  during  the 
past  7  years  (B.  M.  May,  in  litt.).  Mexisphodrus,  on  the  other  hand,  has 
undergone  the  sort  of  structural  reduction  and  adaptation  seen  in  European 
cavernicoles — (a)  the  eyes  are  small,  pale,  and  flat;  (b)  depigmentation 
has  occurred;  (c)  the  legs  and  antennae  are  unusually  long  and  slender; 
and  (d)  the  tibiae  and  tarsi  are  heavily  setose/spinulose.  Apterism  is  an 
additional  characteristic  of  cavernicoles,  but  also  occurs  among  certain 
epigean  sphodrines.  Mexisphodrus  further  differs  from  all  the  sphodrines 
I  have  seen  in  having  all  the  tarsi  longitudinally  carinate  on  the  sides,  as  in 
some  Agonina  and  Synuchina.  Some  Taphoxenus  spp.  have  a  carina  on 
the  first  segment  of  the  meso-  and  metatarsi.  An  additional  peculiarity  of 
Mexisphodrus  is  that  the  4th  tarsomere  is  deeply  bilobate  and  heavily 
setose  beneath,  as  in  many  arboreal  agonines  (e.g.  Colpodes  spp.). 

Prosphodrus  and  Mexisphodrus  share  the  distinction  of  possessing  an 
agonine  right  paramere  (i.e.,  conchoidal  and  smaller  than  the  left),  rather 
than  the  styloid  sphodrine  type.  However,  their  truncate  prosternal  process 
and  their  general  habitus  leave  no  doubt  of  their  affinities.  The  conchoidal 
right  paramere  is  almost  certainly  archaic  (for  sphodrines),  and  suggests 
that  these  2  genera  are  relicts  of  an  ancient  wave  of  dispersal.  The  evolution 
of  the  styloid  right  paramere  must  have  occurred  later  in  other  sphodrines, 
prior  to  dispersal  of  various  groups  westward  across  Europe. 

It  seems  probable  that  the  true  sphodrines  originated  and  dispersed 
from  central  Asia  (Jeannel,  1937).  Prosphodrus  seems  closer  to  Sphodrus 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


71 


Table  1 

SOME  DIAGNOSTIC  CHARACTERS  OF  GENERA  OF  TRUE  SPHODRINES 


Primitive 

1.  Both  parameres  conchoidal 

2.  No  metatibial  brush 

3.  Tarsi  glabrous 

4.  Tarsi  smooth 

5.  Claws  simple 

6.  Metatrochanters  simple 

7.  Mesosternum  unarmed 

8.  Profemora  simple 

9.  Elytra  with  discal  punctures 

10.  Antennal  pubescence  beginning  on 
segment  IV 


Derivative 

1.  Right  paramere  styloid 

2.  Subapical  brush  of  setae  on  inner 
face  of  metatibia 

3.  Tarsi  pubescent 

4.  Tarsi  strigose 

5.  Claws  serrate  or  dentate 

6.  Metatrochanters  apically  acuminate 

7.  Mesosternum  with  antecoxal  tooth 

8.  Profemora  with  setose  crests 

9.  No  discal  punctures  on  elytra 

10.  Antennal  pubescence  beginning  on 
segment  III 


Table  2 

PRIMITIVE  ( - )  AND  DERIVATIVE  (  +  )  CHARACTERS  OF  SOME  GENERA  OF 

TRUE  SPHODRINES 


(Numbered  columns  follow  same  sequence  as  in  Table  1) 


1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

Total  +  + 

Sphodrus 

+ 

+ 

— 

— 

— 

+ 

+ 

— 

+ 

— 

5 

Eremosphodrus* 

+ 

+ 

— 

+ 

— 

+ 

+ 

— 

+ 

— 

6 

Taphoxenus 

+ 

+ 

— 

(  +  ) 

— 

— 

+ 

— 

3  or  4 

Sphodropsis 

+ 

— 

+ 

— 

— 

— 

— 

+ 

— 

3 

Cryptotrichus 

+ 

— 

+ 

+ 

— 

+ 

— 

+ 

— 

5 

Antisphodrus 

+ 

— 

+ 

— 

— 

+ 

— 

+ 

— 

4 

Laemosthenes 

+ 

— 

+ 

— 

H- 

— 

— 

+ 

— 

4 

Licinopsis* 

+ 

— 

+ 

— 

(+) 

— 

— 

— 

+ 

3  or  4 

Pristonychus 

+ 

+ 

— 

(  +  ) 

— 

+ 

+ 

5  or  6 

C  euthosphodrus 

+ 

+ 

+ 

— 

(+> 

— 

+ 

— 

4  or  5 

Calathidius * 

+ 

+ 

+ 

— 

+ 

— 

— 

— 

+ 

+ 

6 

Prosphodrus 

0 

Mexisphodrus 

0 

*  These  genera  not  seen;  data  from  literature. 

(  +  )  indicates  character  present  in  one  or  more  subgenera  but  not  prevalent 
throughout  entire  genus. 


than  to  any  other  of  the  known  genera.  Although  Sphodrus  itself  has  too 
many  derivative  characters  to  be  a  direct  ancestor,  it  is  perhaps  worth 
noting  that  its  species  are  winged  and  range  widely  across  Europe  to 
northern  India.  Despite  its  troglobic  habits,  Prosphodrus  has  a  morphology 
which  suggests  it  is  not  limited  to  caves.  Perhaps  a  cave  is  only  a  convenient 
place  to  collect  it.  Mexisphodnts  is  morphologically  most  closely  similar 
to  Taphoxemis  s.str.,  a  subgenus  whose  species  have  a  reduced  metatibial 
brush,  smooth  tarsi,  flattened  elytra,  and  the  sides  of  the  pronotum  expla- 
nate.  The  presence  of  Taphoxenus  in  eastern  Asia  is  compatible  with  an 
hypothesis  that  sphodrines  crossed  a  Bering  land  bridge  into  North  America 
some  time  during  the  Tertiary  and  that  Mexisphodrus  is  a  relict  of  this  early 
invasion. 


72 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


Literature  Cited 

Barr,  T.  C.,  Jr. 

1960.  The  cavernicolous  beetles  of  the  subgenus  Rhadine,  genus  Agonum 
(Coleoptera:  Carabidae).  Amer.  Midi.  Nat.  64(l):45-65. 

Bolivar  y  Pieltain,  C.,  and  J.  Hendrichs. 

1964.  Agoninos  cavernicolas  nuevos  del  genero  Rhadine  de  Nuevo  Leon, 
Coahuila,  y  San  Luis  Potosi  (Mexico)  (Col.,  Carab.).  Ciencia  [Mexico] 
23(1) : 5- 1 6,  1  pi. 

Britton,  E.  B. 

1959.  Carabidae  (Coleoptera)  from  New  Zealand  caves.  Proc.  Ent.  Soc. 
London  (B)  28:103-106. 

Jeannel,  R. 

1937.  Notes  sur  les  carabiques  (deuxieme  note):  4.  Revision  des  genres  des 
Sphodrides.  Rev.  Frangaise  Ent.  4(2)  :73-100. 

Lindroth,  C.  H. 

1956.  A  revision  of  the  genus  Synuchus  Gyllenhal  (Coleoptera:  Carabidae)  in 
the  widest  sense,  with  notes  on  Pristosia  Motschulsky  ( Eucalathus  Bates) 
and  Calathus  Bonelli.  Trans.  Ent.  Soc.  London  108(2)  :485-585. 

Ueno,  S. 

1955.  New  cave-dwelling  anchomenids  of  Japan.  Opusc.  Ent.  20(l):56-64. 


7  p 


LITERATURE  NOTICE 

TENEBRIONIDAE  BEETLES  OF  THE  NEVADA  TEST  SITE.  By  V.  M. 
Tanner  and  W.  A.  Packham.  Brigham  Young  Univ.  Sci.  Bull.,  Biol.  Ser.  6(1):  1-44, 
21  figs.  1965. — 46  species  in  31  genera  are  keyed  and  described.  Some  are  illustrated. 
Perhaps  the  most  helpful  part  of  this  study  is  the  listing  of  plant  communities  in 
which  each  species  is  found.  Seasonal  activity  of  each  species  is  discussed  and  shown 
graphically. 


NOTICE 

A  new  entomological  magazine  has  arrived.  Quaestiones  Entomologicae  is  a 
quarterly  record  of  entomological  investigations  published  by  the  Department  of 
Entomology,  University  of  Alberta,  Edmonton,  Canada.  Quaest.  Ent.  (the  World 
List  abbreviation)  is  intended  to  provide  prompt,  low-cost  publication  for  accounts 
of  entomological  research  of  greater  than  average  length.  Volume  1,  Number  1, 
January  1965,  40  pp.,  is  printed  by  an  offset  process  and  contains  a  35-page  article 
on  mosquito  behaviour,  an  editorial,  and  a  book  review.  Subscription  rates  are  the 
same  for  institutions,  libraries,  and  individuals,  $4.00  per  volume  of  4  issues,  single 
issues  $1.00.  An  abstract  edition  is  available,  printed  on  one  side  of  paper  and  on 
one  or  both  sides  (according  to  length)  of  3x5  inch  index  cards  (at  $1.00  per  volume) 
or  on  5x8  inch  standard  single  row  punched  cards  ($1.50  per  volume).  Subscriptions 
and  enquiries  should  be  sent  to  the  address  given  above.  The  Bulletin  wishes 
Quaestiones  Entomologicae  a  long,  happy,  and  fruitful  life. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


73 


REVISION  OF  ORUS.  II.  SUBGENERA  ORUS,  PYCNORUS 

AND  NIVORUS 

(COLEOPTERA:  STAPHYLINIDAE) 

By  Lee  H.  Herman,  Jr.1 

The  Paederinae  genus  Orus  Casey,  1884,  was  erected  to  include  .  . 
the  minute  forms  .  .  Scopaeus  exiguus  Erichson,  Orus  picipes  Casey  and 
Orus  punctatus  Casey.  The  species  Orus  picipes  Casey  and  Orus  exiguus 
(Erichson)  were  removed  to  a  new  genus,  Leptorus  Casey,  1886,  now  a 
junior  synonym  of  Scopaeus  Erichson.  Five  additional  species,  Orus  guate- 
malenus  Sharp,  1886,  Orus  parallelus  Casey,  1886,  and  three  by  Fall  in 
1901,  Orus  fraternus,  Orus  montanus  and  Orus  femoratus,  increased  the 
number  of  species  to  six.  To  this  point,  but  for  Orus  parallelus,  the  species 
were  described  from  at  least  one  male.  In  1905  Casey  described  six  species, 
each  from  a  female:  O.  boreellus,  O.  longicollis,  O.  pugetanus,  O.  robustu- 
lus,  O.  pinalinus  and  O.  deceptor;  six  additional  species  were  described 
from  males:  O.  sonamae,  O.  pallidus,  O.  filius,  O.  distinctus,  O.  shastanus 
and  O.  cervicula.  From  a  single  female  specimen,  O.  provensis  Casey  was 
described  and  O.  cervicula  was  moved  (Casey,  1910)  to  Pseudorus  Casey, 
a  new  genus  which  is  now  a  junior  synonym  of  Scopaeus  Erichson. 

Described  as  new  genera  in  1905  were  Leucorus  Casey,  treated  by 
Herman  (1965),  and  Pycnorus  Casey.  Pycnorus  was  erected  to  include 
Scopaeus  dentiger  LeConte,  1880,  Scopaeus  armiger  Fall,  1902,  and 
Pycnorus  iowanus,  a  new  species  described  from  one  female.  Bernhauer 
and  Schubert  (1912)  considered  Orus,  Pycnorus,  and  Leucorus  as  sub¬ 
genera  of  Scopaeus  which  resulted  in  Scheerpeltz’s  renaming  the  preoccu¬ 
pied  Scopaeus  (Orus)  longicollis  (Casey)  to  Scopaeus  caseyianus.  Leng 
( 1920)  listed  Orus,  Leucorus  and  Pycnorus  as  separate  genera;  Blackwelder 
separated  as  genera  Scopaeus  and  Orus  including  Leucorus  and  Pycnorus 
as  subgenera  of  Orus.  Blackwelder’s  (1939a)  interpretation  is  followed 
here,  using  as  a  basis  of  separation  of  Orus  and  Scopaeus  the  thicker  neck 
of  Orus. 

Two  additional  species,  Orus  volans  and  Orus  cameroni,  were  described 
and  included  in  the  subgenus  Leucorus  by  Blackwelder  (1943);  later  these 
species  were  set  aside  in  a  separate  subgenus  Nivorus  and  Orus  guatema- 
lenus  was  placed  in  the  subgenus  Leucorus  by  Herman  (1965). 

The  measurements  used  here  were  described  previously  by  Herman 
(1965). 

Acknowledgements.  I  thank  the  following  for  loan  of  specimens  and/or 
use  of  holotypes:  Mr.  O.  L.  Cartwright  and  Dr.  P.  J.  Spangler,  U.  S. 
National  Museum;  Dr.  C.  H.  Seevers  and  Dr.  R.  W.  Wenzel,  Chicago 
Natural  History  Museum;  Dr.  H.  J.  Grant,  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences 
of  Philadelphia;  Miss  C.  M.  R.  von  Hayek,  British  Museum  (Natural  His¬ 
tory);  Dr.  M.  W.  Sanderson,  Illinois  State  Natural  History  Survey;  Mr.  I. 
Moore,  San  Diego  Natural  History  Museum;  Dr.  H.  F.  Howden  and  Mr. 


1  Department  of  Biology,  Catholic  University  of  America,  Washington,  D.  C.  20017. 


74 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


W.  J.  Brown,  Canada  Department  of  Agriculture;  Dr.  J.  A.  Powell,  Uni¬ 
versity  of  California;  Mr.  H.  B.  Leech,  California  Academy  of  Science; 
Dr.  G.  W.  Byers,  University  of  Kansas;  Dr.  L.  L.  Pechumen,  Cornell 
University;  Dr.  P.  J.  Darlington,  Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology. 


Genus  Orus  Casey 

Orus  Casey,  1884:136;  1885:315;  1886:221,  226-228;  Fall,  1901:223- 
224;  Casey  1905:191,  196-203;  1910:190;  Bernhauer  and  Schubert 
1912:245-251;  Gibson  and  Treherne  1916:56;  Treherne  1916:141- 
143;  Leng  1920:  104;  Scheerpeltz  1933:1265;  Blackwelder  1936:52, 
62,  91;  1939a:98,  105,  120;  1939b:24;  1943:230,  277-279; 
1944:119;  Clark  1949:21;  Blackwelder  1952:278,  420;  Hatch 
1957:150,  159,  160,  343;  Arnett  1961:244,  269;  Herman  1965:112- 
121. 

TYPE-SPECIES:  Orus  punctatus  Casey,  1884.  Fixed  by  Blackwelder 
(1939a)  by  subsequent  designation. 

Four  subgenera,  Orus,  Pycnorus,  Leucorus,  and  Nivorus  are  distin¬ 
guished. 

DESCRIPTION.  Piceous,  castaneous  or  testaceous,  moderately  pubescent.  Head: 
quadrilateral  to  rectangular  in  dorsal  aspect,  sides  broadly  arcuate,  truncate  posteri¬ 
orly,  dorsum  and  venter  punctate;  gula  with  feeble  to  strong  microrecticulate  ground 
sculpturing;  labrum  edentate,  bidentate  or  quadridentate,  long  setae  on  anterior 
portion,  with  median  emargination;  mandibular  dentition  variable;  eye  feebly  to 
strongly  tapered  posteriorly;  postorbital  setigerous  fovea  or  furrow  present.  Thorax: 
neck  usually  Va  or  more  as  wide  as  head2;  prothorax  longer  than  wide;  profemur 
robust,  with  meso-ventrally  directed  ctenidia  on  one  side;  protibia  with  scopae; 
protarsus  expanded;  mesosternal  fovea  present  or  absent;  elytra  indistinctly  punctate, 
epipleuron  margined;  metafemur  modified  or  not;  metatibia  with  ctenidia  on  inner 
side  of  apex.  Abdomen:  punctulate;  sterna  of  female  unmodified;  last  two  visible 
sterna  of  male  variously  modified.  Aedeagus:  median  lobe  bulbous;  parameres  con¬ 
nate,  attenuate;  dorso-basal  median  foramen,  ostium  apical  or  subapical,  dorsal  or 
ventral;  circoforamen  present;  postforamen  present  or  absent. 

DISTRIBUTION:  UNITED  STATES,  CANADA,  MEXICO,  WEST 
INDIES,  GUATEMALA,  SURINAM. 

Key  to  the  Described  Species  of  Orus  and  Pycnorus  (Males) 

1.  Gular  tubercle  prominent  on  males,  prominent  to  feeble  on  females;  gula  impressed, 

with  strong  microreticulate  ground  sculpturing  present  in  both  sexes - (PYCNORUS)  2 

Gular  tubercle  absent  in  both  sexes;  gula  not  impressed  (i.e.  at  same  level  as  adjacent 
postgenae),  microreticulate  ground  sculpturing  absent  or  very  feebly  present  in 
both  sexes  - (ORUS  s.  str.)  3 

2.  Metatibia  with  row  of  spines  on  one  side;  metafemur  usually  with  eleven  denticles 

on  the  distal  end;  east  of  the  Rocky  Mountains - DENTIGER 

Metatibia  without  row  of  spines;  metafemur  usually  with  seven  denticles  on  distal 

end;  Rocky  Mountains  - PARALLELUS 

3.  Last  visible  abdominal  sternum  shallowly  incised  (figs.  3,  8) -  4 

Last  visible  abdominal  sternum  deeply  incised  (fig.  2) -  5 

4.  Fifth  visible  abdominal  sternum  emarginate  (fig.  8);  neck  Vs  width  of  head - M0NTANUS 

Fifth  visible  sternum  sinuo-truncate  (fig.  3);  neck  Va  or  more  the  width  of  the 

head  - SHASTANUS 

5.  Fifth  visible  abdominal  sternum  with  strongly  sinuate  margin  (fig.  7) - SINUATUS 

Fifth  visible  abdominal  sternum  with  margin  lobed  or  emarginate -  6 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


75 


6.  Fifth  visible  abdominal  sternum  with  margin  shallowly  emarginate  (fig.  11) - FRATERNUS 

Fifth  visible  abdominal  sternum  with  margin  lobed -  7 

7.  Fifth  visible  abdominal  sternum  with  a  tubercle -  9 

Fifth  visible  abdominal  sternum  without  a  tubercle -  8 

8.  Parameres  short,  not  extending  beyond  apex  of  median  lobe,  broad,  with  lateral 

margins  straight  in  dorsal  aspect  (figs.  22,  23) - HEMILOBATUS 

Parameres  long,  extending  beyond  end  of  median  lobe,  slender,  lateral  margins  sinuate 
in  dorsal  aspect  (figs.  16,  29) - PUNCTATUS 

9.  Abdominal  tubercle  well-developed,  margined  laterally  by  a  carina  (fig.  9);  metafemur 

carinate  - FEMORATUS 


Abdominal  tubercle  feeble,  not  margined  laterally  by  a  carina;  metafemur  not  carinate 

- DISTINCTUS 


Subgenus  Orus  Casey 

TYPE-SPECIES:  Orus  punctatus  Casey,  1884.  Fixed  by  Blackwelder 
(1939a)  by  subsequent  designation. 

DESCRIPTION.  Orus:  testaceous,  castaneous  or  piceous.  Head:  quadrilateral  in  dor¬ 
sal  aspect;  dorsum  finely  punctate;  venter  with  sparse  more  distinct  punctation,  ground 
sculpture  feeble,  shining;  gula  with  very  feeble  microreticulate  ground  sculpturing, 
not  impressed;  gular  tubercle  completely  absent;  gular  sutures  represented  by  increased 
pigmentation;  labrum  quadridentate;  right  mandible  quadridentate,  left  mandible 
tridentate;  setigerous  postorbital  fovea  present,  continuous  with  feeble  to  prominent 
supraorbital  furrow.  Thorax:  anterior  prothoracic  angles  evident;  pronotal  punctation 
distinct  and  umbilicate,  median  area  impunctate;  mesopleuron  and  mesosternum 
with  reticulate  ground  sculpture;  mesosternal  fovea  present;  metafemur  modified  or 
not.  Abdomen:  last  two  visible  sterna  of  male  modified.  Aedeagus :  ostium  beneath 
parameres;  postforamen  absent,  median  lobe  membranous  ventrally,  ventral  sclerite 
absent. 

DISTRIBUTION.  CANADA:  British  Columbia;  UNITED  STATES: 
Washington,  Oregon,  California,  Arizona,  Nevada,  Idaho,  Montana, 
Wyoming,  Colorado. 

DISCUSSION .  Not  discussed  below  are  Orus  robustulus  Casey,  1905 
(Lake  Tahoe,  California);  Orus  pinalinus  Casey,  1905  (Pinal  Mountains, 
Arizona);  Orus  deceptor  Casey,  1905  (Humboldt  Co.,  California);  each 
was  described  from  a  single  female  specimen.  Each  may  be  distinguished 
from  the  others  by  size  or  facies  but  enough  individual  variation  and 
overlap  exist  for  these  characters  to  make  them  unreliable.  Association 
with  a  male  has  likewise  been  impossible.  The  only  association  possible, 
and  that  on  distribution,  is  of  O.  pinalinus  and  O.  punctatus  both  with  repre¬ 
sentatives  from  Arizona. 


Orus  ( Orus )  punctatus  Casey 

Figs.  2,  4-6,  16,  29,  33 

Orus  punctatus  Casey,  1884:138;  1885:315,  pi.  1,  fig.  7-7c;  Fall  1901:223; 
Casey  1905:200;  Gibson  1916:205;  Gibson  and  Treherne  1916:56; 
Treherne  1916:141-143;  Leng  1920:104;  Blackwelder  1936:52,  62, 
91;  1939a: 105,  120; 1939b:24;  1943:277;  1952:278;  Clark  1949:21, 
Hatch  1957:159-160. 


-The  neck  of  Orus  montanus  is  1/5  the  width  of  the  head. 


76 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


Scopaeus  (Orus)  punctatus  (Casey),  Bernhauer  and  Schubert  1912:251. 
Orus  filius  Casey,  1905:200;  Leng  1920:104;  Blackwelder  1939a:  105; 

1939b:24.  (NEW  SYNONYMY). 

Scopaeus  (Orus)  filius  Casey,  Bernhauer  and  Schubert  1912:  247. 

Orus  pallidus  Casey,  1905:199;  Leng  1920:104;  Blackwelder  1939a:  105; 

1939b:24  (NEW  SYNONYMY). 

Scopaeus  (Orus)  pallidus  (Casey),  Bernhauer  and  Schubert  1912:250. 
Orus  sonomae  Casey,  1905:198;  Leng  1920:104;  Blackwelder  1939a:  105; 

1939b:24.  (NEW  SYNONYMY). 

Scopaeus  (Orus)  sonomae  (Casey),  Bernhauer  and  Schubert  1912:251. 

HOLOTYPE  of  Orus  punctatus  Casey:  California;  U.  S.  National  Mu¬ 
seum;  male.  At  the  Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology  is  a  specimen  of  Orus 
punctatus  labeled  as  “Type.”  In  the  Casey  Collection  of  the  U.  S.  National 
Museum  are  two  specimens  labeled  as  “?Type”  and  “Neotype.”  Each  of 
the  specimens  fits  the  description  of  Orus  punctatus  but  the  original  descrip¬ 
tion  is  of  one  specimen  from  California.  The  neotypic  designation  is  invalid 
and  no  evidence  has  been  found  that  the  holotype  was  deposited  at 
M.C.Z.;  I  therefore  accept  the  specimen  in  the  Casey  Collection  labeled 
as  “?Type”  as  the  holotype. 

HOLOTYPE  of  Orus  filius  Casey:  Mokelumne  Hill,  California;  U.  S. 
National  Museum;  male. 

HOLOTYPE  of  Orus  pallidus  Casey:  California;  U.  S.  National  Mu¬ 
seum;  male.  Paratypes:  5  males,  2  females. 

HOLOTYPE  of  Orus  sonomae  Casey:  California;  U.  S.  National  Mu¬ 
seum;  male. 

DESCRIPTION  OF  THE  HOLOTYPE.  Orus;  (Orus);  piceous;  appendages  castane- 
ous;  male.  Head:  dorsum  uniformly  punctate;  .49  mm.  long,  .43  mm.  wide.  Thorax: 
pronotum  .48  mm.  long,  .42  mm.  wide;  elytra  .63  mm.  long,  .54  mm.  wide.  Abdomen: 
fifth  visible  sternum  with  a  lobed  margin;  lobe  broad  with  the  posterior  margin  arcuate; 
slightly  impressed  medially;  last  visible  sternum  deeply  and  broadly  incised,  mesal 
margins  of  apices  parallel,  convergent  basally  (fig.  2).  Aedeagus:  parameres  in  lateral 
aspect  strongly  acuminate,  in  dorsal  aspect  broad,  lateral  margins  sinuate,  attenuate 
distally;  circoforamen  well-developed  (figs.  16,  29). 

VARIATION .  Body  coloration  may  be  castaneous,  testaceous  or  piceous. 
Ground  sculpturing  of  the  head  and  pronotum  may  be  feebly  to  strongly 
microreticulate  or  absent;  the  gula  may  be  slightly  impressed,  but  without 
a  tubercle.  Greatest  variation  is  of  the  lobe  of  the  penultimate  sternum, 
examples  of  which  are  shown  in  figs.  2,  4-6;  all  degrees  of  intergradation 
of  this  character  exist  and  from  any  one  locality,  in  collections  of  the  same 
date,  several  different  lobed  conditions  may  be  found. 

Size  variation  is  as  follows:  head  .50  mm. -.56  mm.  long,  .44  mm.-. 47 
mm.  wide;  pronotum.  50  mm.-. 56  mm.  long;  .40  mm.-. 45  mm.  wide;  elytra 
.58  mm. -.70  mm.  long,  .54  mm. -.66  mm.  wide.  The  length  of  the  parameters 
may  vary  slightly. 

DISTRIBUTION  (fig.  33).  BRITISH  COLUMBIA:  Terrace  (Nov. 
24,  1923);  CALIFORNIA:  Calveras  Co.:  Mokelumne  Hill  (July  18, 
1910);  San  Diego  Co.:  San  Diego  (June  5,  1950),  Lakeside;  Alameda 
Co.:  Dimond  (May  15,  1910),  Oakland  (Sept.  27,  1908,  June  7,  1908); 
Santa  Cruz  Co.:  Mount  Hermon  (July  28,  1922),  Watsonville  (July  3, 
1936);  Sonoma  Co.:  Duncan  Mills  (July  21,  1908);  Sacramento  Co.: 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


77 


Folsom;  Los  Angeles  Co.:  Mount  Wilson;  Fresno  Co.:  Fresno;  Riverside 
Co.:  Palm  Springs  (May  30,  1905);  Mendocino  Co.:  Rancheria  Creek 
5.5  miles  SE  Boonville  (June  15,  1950),  Ukiah  (Sept.  30,  1906);  Marin 
Co.:  Taylorville  (Dec.  28,  1919);  Santa  Clara  Co.:  Los  Gatos  (June  4, 
7,  1910);  Humboldt  Co.:  Willow  Creek  (June  14,  15,  1916);  Lake  Co  • 
Lakeport  (June  4,  1922),  McNeill’s  pond,  3  miles  N.  Lakeport  (Aug.  3, 
1955);  Sugar  Pine;  Shasta  Springs  (July  6,  1904);  San  Mateo  Co.;  Contra 
Costa  Co.;  Orange  Co.:  Foster.  MONTANA:  Hill  Co.:  Bearpaw  Moun¬ 
tain  (Nov.  3,  4,  1917);  Flat  Head  Co.:  Kalispell  (June  13,  1920).  ARI¬ 
ZONA:  Coconino  Co.:  Williams  (June  9,  13),  Flagstaff.  OREGON:  Mult¬ 
nomah  Co.:  Portland  (July  12,  1898).  WASHINGTON:  Thurston  Co  * 
Tenino;  Spokane  Falls;  Yakima  Co.:  Yakima.  COLORADO:  Summit  Co  • 
Breckenridge  (July  15-18,  1896,  at  9600-10,000  feet  elevation).  NEVA¬ 
DA:  Ormsby  Co.:  Lake  Tahoe. 

BIOLOGY.  This  species  has  been  reported  as  a  predator  of  Hylemya 
brassicae  (Bouche),  the  cabbage  maggot;  experiments  showed  50-100% 
of  the  eggs  and  young  maggots  were  eaten  when  offered.  In  captivity  Orus 
punctatus  lived  for  3-87  days.  (Gibson  1916,  Gibson  and  Treherne  1916 
Treherne  1916.) 

Wherever  there  is  a  rivulet  or  a  pond  this  species  may  be  gathered 
in  multitudes  amongst  the  rubbish  along  the  bank”  (Casey,  1886)  at 
various  times  during  May  through  December. 

DISCUSSION.  The  variation  of  the  sternal  character  (figs.  2,  4,  5,  6) 
makes  it  impossible  to  separate  the  specimens  and  the  aedeagus  is  virtually 
identical  in  all  the  specimens  examined.  The  holotypes  of  O.  filius,  O. 
pallidus  and  O.  sonomae  are  represented  within  the  range  of  variation  and 
are  considered  to  be  variants  of  Orus  punctatus. 


Orus  (Orus)  shastanus  Casey 
Figs  3,  17,  30,  33 

Orus  shastanus  Casey,  1905:201;  Leng  1920: 104;  Blackwelder  1939a-105- 
1939b:24.  '  ’ 

Scopaeus  (Orus)  shastanus  (Casey),  Bernhauer  and  Schubert  1912:251. 
Orus  pugetanus  Casey,  1905 : 198;  Leng  1920: 104;  Blackwelder  1939a- 105* 
1939b:24.  (NEW  SYNONYMY) 

Scopaeus  (Orus)  pugetanus  (Casey),  Bernhauer  and  Schubert  1912:250. 

HOLOTYPE  of  Orus  shastanus  Casey:  Siskiyou  County,  California; 
U.  S.  National  Museum;  male.  Paratypes:  1  male,  2  females. 

HOLOTYPE  of  Orus  Pugetanus  Casey:  Spokane,  Washington;  U.  S. 
National  Museum;  female. 

DESCRIPTION  OF  THE  HOLOTYPE.  Orus;  (Orus);  castaneous,  appendages 
pa  tr,  male.  Hecid.  dorsum  with  sparse  and  feeble  punctation,  dense  microreticulate 
ground  sculpturing;  .50  mm.  long,  .44  mm.  wide.  Thorax:  pronotum  with  sparse 
punctation.  moderately  distinct,  with  dense  microreticulate  ground  sculpturing;  pro- 
notum  .47  mm.  long,  .40  mm.  wide;  elytra  .60  mm.  long,  .54  mm.  wide.  Abdomen : 
ntth  visible  sternum  with  margin  sinuo-truncate,  margin  becoming  acute  at  middle, 
sternum  with  broad,  shallow,  median  impression;  last  visible  sternum  broadly  and 
shallowly  incised,  anterior  margin  and  apices  of  incision  broadly  rounded  (fig.  3). 
Aedeagus;  parameres  in  dorsal  aspect  attenuate,  in  lateral  aspect  base  broad  and 
becoming  attenuate  distally  (figs.  17,  30). 


78 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


VARIATION .  Size:  head  .50  mm.-. 54  mm.  long,  .44  mm.-. 47  mm.  wide; 
pronotum  .47  mm. -.54  mm.  long,  .40  mm.-. 45  mm.  wide;  elytra  .68  mm.- 
.72  mm.  long,  .56  mm. -.67  mm.  wide. 

DISTRIBUTION  (fig.  33).  CALIFORNIA:  Siskiyou  Co.:  Shasta  Re¬ 
treat  (July,  at  2416  feet  elevation);  Shasta  Co.:  Crag  Castle  (July  26, 
1896).  NEVADA:  Ormsby  Co.:  Lake  Tahoe. 


Orus  ( Orus)  sinuatus  Herman,  NEW  SPECIES 

Figs.  7,  19,  26,  33 

HOLOTYPE:  Duncan  Mills,  Sonoma  County,  California;  F.  E.  Blais- 
dell  collector;  July  21,  1908;  male;  to  be  deposited  in  the  California 
Academy  of  Science.  Paratypes:  6  males,  4  deposited  with  the  holotype,  2 
in  the  Chicago  Natural  History  Museum. 

DESCRIPTION  OF  THE  HOLOTYPE.  Orus;  (Orus);  male;  piceous.  Head:  dorsum 
with  sparse,  feeble  punctation,  ground  sculpturing  absent;  .50  mm.  long,  .44  mm. 
wide.  Thorax:  pronotum  with  moderate,  distinct  punctation,  ground  sculpturing 
absent;  pronotum  .48  mm.  long,  .39  mm.  wide;  elytra  .61  mm.  long,  .54  mm.  wide. 
Abdomen:  fifth  visible  sternum  with  posterior  margin  sinuate  and  with  slight,  median, 
oval  depression;  last  visible  sternum  with  broad,  deep  incision;  mesal  margins  of 
incision  convergent,  not  parallel  at  any  portion  (fig.  7).  Aedeagus:  apical  third  of 
parameres  reduced  to  a  carina,  carina  not  triangular  dorso-ventrally  (figs.  19,26). 

VARIATION .  Size:  head  .49  mm. -.54  mm.  long,  .42  mm. -.48  mm. 
wide;  pronotum  .47  mm. -.54  mm.  long,  .36  mm. -.46  mm.  wide;  elytra  .61 
mm. -68  mm.  long,  .54  mm. -.62  mm.  wide. 

DISTRIBUTION  (fig.  33) .  CALIFORNIA:  Sonoma  Co.:  Duncan  Mills 
(July  21,  1908).  WASHINGTON:  King  Co.:  Baring  (July). 


Orus  ( Orus )  montanus  Fall 
Figs.  8,  20,  27,  33 

Orus  montanus  Fall,  1901:223;  Casey  1905:198;  Leng  1920:  104;  Black- 
welder  1939a: 105,  1939b:24. 

Scopaeus  (Orus)  montanus  (Fall),  Bernhauer  and  Schubert  1912:249. 

HOLOTYPE :  San  Bernardino  Mountains,  California;  Museum  of  Com¬ 
parative  Zoology;  male.  Paratype:  1  female. 

DESCRIPTION  OF  THE  HOLOTYPE.  Orus;  (Orus);  piceous;  male.  Head:  .57 
mm.  long;  .57  mm.  wide;  neck  1/5  as  wide  as  head.  Thorax:  pronotum  .61  mm.  long, 
.48  mm.  wide;  elytra  .66  mm.  long,  .67  mm.  wide.  Abdomen:  margin  of  fifth  visible 
sternum  with  broad,  shallowly  v-shaped  emargination;  margin  of  last  visible  sternum 
shallowly  incised  (fig.  8).  Aedeagus:  parameres  reduced  to  carina,  carina  dorso- 
ventrally  triangular  (figs.  20,  27). 

One  specimen  examined.  Distribution  in  fig.  33. 


Orus  (Orus)  femoratus  Fall 
Figs.  9,  18,  21,  33 

Orus  femoratus  Fall,  1901:224;  Casey  1905:202;  Leng  1920:104. 
Scopaeus  (Orus)  femoratus  (Fall),  Bernhauer  and  Schubert  1912:247. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


79 


HOLOTYPE:  Marin  County,  California;  Museum  of  Comparative 
Zoology;  male. 

DESCRIPTION  OF  THE  HOLOTYPE.  Orus;  ( Or  us);  piceous;  male.  Head:  dorsum 
with  anterior  median  region  impunctate,  shining;  .50  mm.  long,  .46  mm.  wide;  gula 
slightly  depressed.  Thorax:  pronotum  with  distinct  punctation,  median  area  impunc¬ 
tate,  shining,  without  ground  sculpturing;  pronotum  .50  mm.  long,  .42  mm.  wide; 
elytra  .63  mm.  long,  .54  mm.  wide;  metafemur  robust  with  a  carina  on  dorsal' 
posterior  edge.  Abdomen:  fifth  visible  sternum  with  lobed  posterior  margin,  with  a 
large  median  tubercle,  deep  depression  before  tubercle;  tubercle  with  strong,  arcuate 
carina  laterad;  last  visible  sternum  deeply  incised;  incision  with  anterior  margin 
broadly  rounded,  broader  medially  than  apically;  apices  turned  mesally  (fig.  9). 
Aedeagus:  parameres  narrower  basally  than  medially  in  dorsal  aspect,  not  extending 
beyond  posterior  margin  of  median  lobe;  circoforamen  large,  well-developed  (figs. 
18,  21). 

One  specimen  examined.  Distribution  in  fig.  33. 


Orus  (Orus)  hemilobatus  Herman,  NEW  SPECIES 

Figs.  10,  22,  23,  33 

HOLOTYPE:  Mokelumne  Hill,  Calaveras  County,  California;  F.  E. 
Blaisdell  collector;  male;  to  be  deposited  in  the  California  Academy  of 
Science.  Paratypes:  15  males;  13  to  be  deposited  with  the  holotype;  2  to  be 
deposited  at  the  U.  S.  National  Museum. 


DESCRIPTION  OF  THE  HOLOTYPE.  Orus;  (Orus);  piceous;  male.  Head:  dorsum 
with  dense,  distinct  punctation;  ground  sculpturing  obscure;  .50  mm.  long,  .45  mm. 
wide.  Thorax:  pronotum  with  distinct  punctation;  microreticulate  ground  sculpturing; 
pronotum  .50  mm.  long,  .42  mm.  wide;  elytra  .67  mm.  long,  .60  mrn.  wide.  Abdomen: 
fifth  visible  sternum  with  margin  feebly  lobed  and  slightly  sinuate,  with  a  feeble 
median  depression;  last  visible  sternum  with  incision  similar  to  that  of  Orus  punctatus 
(fig.  10).  Aedeagus:  parameres  short,  not  extending  to  posterior  margin  of  median 
lobe,  broad,  side  margins  straight  in  dorsal  aspect,  apex  directed  dorsally;  circoforamen 
u-shaped  (figs.  22,  23). 

VARIATION.  Head  .47  mm.-. 54  mm.  long,  .40  mm.-. 46  mm.  wide; 
pronotum  .47  mm.-.50  mm.  long,  .37  mm.-.45  mm.  wide;  elytra  .60  mm.- 
.67  mm.  long,  .54  mm. -.67  mm.  wide. 

DIS TRIBUTION  (fig.  33).  CALIFORNIA:  Calaveras  Co.:  Mokelumne 
Hill  (July  25,  27;  Oct.);  Sacramento  Co.:  Folsom;  Butte  Co.:  Oroville 
(June  24,  1927);  Amador  Co.:  Sutter  Creek  (Aug.  4,  1904);  Siskiyou 
Co.:  Sissons  (June) ;  Fresno  Co.:  Fresno. 


Orus  ( Orus)  fr at  emus  Fall 
Figs.  11,  24,  32,  33 

Orus  fraternus  Fall ,  1901:223;  Casey  1905:201;  Leng  1920:104-  Black- 
welder  1939a:  105;  1939b:24. 

Scopaeus  (Orus)  fraternus  (Fall),  Bernhauer  and  Schubert  1912:247. 

HOLOTYPE:  Pomona,  California;  Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology; 
male.  Paratypes:  1  male,  5  females. 

DESCRIPTION  OF  THE  HOLOl  YPE.  Orus;  (Orus);  piceous;  male.  Head:  dorsum 
with  uniform  punctation.  with  dense  microreticulate  ground  sculpturing;  .48  mm. 
long,  .49  mm.  wide.  Thorax:  pronotum  with  distinct,  umbilicate  punctation,  with 
microreticulate  ground  sculpturing;  pronotum  .48  mm.  long,  .40  mm.  wide-  elytra 


80 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


Figures  1-13,  Orus  spp.,  apical  abdominal  sterna  of  males.  1 — den  tiger.  2,  4,  5,  6 — 
punctatus,  variation  of  the  lobe  of  the  penultimate  abdominal  sternum.  3 — shastanus. 
7 — sinuatus.  8 — montanus.  9 — femoratus.  10 — hemilobatus.  11 — fraternus.  12 — 
aistinctus.  13 — surinamensis. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


81 


.56  mm  long,  .52  mm.  wide.  Abdomen:  fifth  visible  sternum  with  margin  broadly 
and  shallowly  emargmate;  sternum  with  median,  longitudinal,  shallow  depression 
margined  laterally  by  low  broadly  rounded  ridges;  last  visible  sternum  incised  as  on 
Or  us  p  nnc  tat  us  (fig.  11).  Aedeagus:  parameres  broader  medially  than  basally  in 
dorsal  aspect,  attenuate  distally,  median  lateral  margins  reflexed;  circoformen  large 
well-developed  (figs.  24,  32).  &  ’ 

Distribution  in  fig.  33. 


Orus  (Orus)  distinctus  Casey 
Figs.  12,  33 

Orus  distinctus  Casey,  1905:201,  Leng  1920:  104;  Blackwelder  1939a-105- 
1939b:24. 

Scopaeus  (Orus)  distinctus  (Casey),  Bernhauer  and  Schubert  1912:247. 

HOLOTYPE:  Santa  Cruz  Mountains,  California;  U.  S.  National  Mu¬ 
seum;  male.  Paratypes:  2  males,  3  females. 

DESCRIPTION  OF  THE  HOLOTYPE.  Orus;  (Orus);  piceous;  appendages  casta- 
neous;  male  Head:  dorsum  with  posterior  portion  uniformly  and  distinctly  punctate 
punctation  becoming  weak  anteriorly,  with  very  feeble  microreticulate  ground  sculp¬ 
turing;  .5_  mm.  long,  .46  mm.  wide.  Thorax:  pronotum  with  feeble  mircoreticulate 
ground  sculpturing;  pronotum  .50  mm.  long,  .41  mm.  wide;  elytra  .64  mm  long  64 
mm.  wide.  Abdomen:  fifth  visible  sternum  with  feebly  lobed  margin,  with  slight 
16b<29)e  ^  middle  near  apex  12 )•  Aedeagus:  similar  to  O.  punctatus  (see  figs. 

VARIATION.  Head  .50  mm.-. 54  mm.  wide,  .44  mm.-. 47  mm.  wide; 
pronotum  .49  mm. -.54  mm.  long,  .40  mm. -.43  mm.  wide;  elytra  .62  mm.- 
.68  mm.  long,  .58  mm. -.67  mm.  wide. 

DISTRIBUTION  (fig.  33).  CALIFORNIA:  San  Mateo  Co.;  Santa  Cruz 
Co.:  Santa  Cruz  Mountains;  Humboldt  Co.:  Willow  Creek  (June  15 

1916);  Marin  Co.:  Fairfax  (June  13,  1905).  BRITISH  COLUMBIA- 
Gale. 

DISCUSSION .  Though  the  lobing  of  the  penultimate  sternum  of  O. 
punc  tatus  and  the  aedeagi  of  both  species  are  virtually  identical,  the  speci¬ 
mens  are  separable  by  the  presence  or  absence  of  the  small  median  tubercle. 
This  tubercle  was  seen  on  6  specimens. 

Subgenus  Pycnorus  Casey 

PycnorusC asey,  1905:191,  192,  194;  Blatchley  1910:433,  434.  Bernhauer 
and  Schubert  1912:245-248;  Leng  1920: 104;  Blackwelder  1939a-98 
105,  121;  1 939b: 24;  1943:277;  1944:119;  1952:333,  420;  Hatch 
1957:159-160;  Arnett  1961:245,  269;  Herman  1965:112,  113. 

ryPE-SPECIES:  Orus  (Pycnorus)  dentiger  (LeConte),  1880.  Fixed  bv 
Blackwelder  (1939a,  p.  121)  by  subsequent  designation. 

DESC  RIP1  ION.  Orus;  testaceous,  castaneous  or  piceous.  Head:  rectangular  in 
dorsal  aspect;  dorsum  finely,  uniformly  punctate;  venter  with  ground  scupture 
obscured  by  dense,  prominent  punctation;  gula  with  very  strong,  reticulate  ground 
sculpturing;  labrum  quadndentate;  right  mandible  tridentate,  left  mandible  quadri- 
dentate  in  male;  right  mandible  quadndentate,  left  tridentate  in  females;  basal  tooth 
on  both  mandibles  of  male  largest  and  separated  from  next  denticle  by  about  twice 
the  distance  separating  the  other  denticles;  gula  depressed,  with  prominent  tubercle 


82 


THE  COLEOPTERiSTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


Figures  14-32,  Orus  spp.,  aedeagi;  in  the  following,  the  first  figure  is  the  lateral 
view,  the  second  figure  is  the  dorsal  view.  14,  28 — dentiger.  15 — parallelus.  16,29 — 
punctcitus.  17,  30 — shcistcinus.  19,  26 — sinuatus.  20,  27 — montanus.  21,  18 — femora- 
tus.  22,  23 — hemilobatus.  24,  32 — fraternus.  25,  31 — surinamensis. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


83 


on  anterior  portion  in  males,  distinct  to  feeble  in  females;  gular  sutures  well- 
developed;  venter  flat,  not  as  convex  as  in  Orus  s.  str.;  eye  slightly  tapered  posteriorly 
postorbital  fovea  with  setigerous  tubercle  continuous  with  prominent  supraorbital 
furrow.  Thorax:  an  tenor  prothoracic  angles  not  evident  or  slightly  so;  pronotal  punc- 
tation  distinct  and  umbilicate,  median  area  impunctate;  mesopleuron  and  mesosternum 
with  reticulate  ground  sculpturing;  mesosternal  fovea  present;  metafemur  of  male 
serrate  on  inner,  posterior  surface,  concave  on  inner  face,  tuft  of  long,  appressed 
setae  arising  near  trochanter.  Abdomen:  first  four  visible  sterna  of  male  each  with  a 
depression  forming  a  trough  on  the  abdomen,  the  depression  surrounded  by  and/or 
containing  setae;  posterior  margin  of  fifth  visible  sternum  broadly  and  shallowlv 
emaiginate,  posterior  margin  of  last  visible  sternum  broadly  and  shallowly  incised 
edeagus:  ostium  beneath  the  parameres;  postforamen  absent;  median  lobe  membra¬ 
nous  ventrally,  oval  sclente  absent. 


ii^TPn  mice'  LANAPA:  Quebec’  Manitoba,  British  Columbia. 
UNITED  STATES:  Massachusetts,  New  York,  New  Jersey,  Michigan 

California,  Idaho,  Washington,  Iowa,  Illinois,  Georgia(?).  ’ 

DISCUSSION.  In  studying  Pycnorus  and  Orus  it  was  found  that  the 
females  were  not  adequately  defined  subgenerically. 

All  ol  the  females  of  Orus  (Pycnorus)  dentiger  examined  have  a  feeble 
to  prominent  gular  tubercle,  microreticulate  gular  ground  sculpturing,  a 
depressed  gula  and  well-defined  gular  sutures;  the  same  is  true  for^the 
males  of  both  species  of  Pycnorus  in  addition  to  the  invariably  prominent 
gular  tubercle.  All  140  males  of  Orus ,  described  or  undescribed,  have  a 
shining  gula  (i.e.  at  best  with  very  feebly  microreticulate  ground  sculpture), 
are  without  evidence  of  a  gular  tubercle,  have  feeble  gular  sutures,  which 
are  better  noted  by  increased  pigmentation  in  the  vicinity,  and  have  the 
gu  a  not  depressed.  The  females  from  the  Rocky  Mountains,  presumably 
representing  those  of  Orus  ( Pycnorus )  parcdlelus  and  Orus  s.  str.,  can  be 
separated  by  the  characters  of  the  gula  noted  above  for  the  males.  The 
tern  ales  with  the  tuberculate,  microreticulate  depressed  gular  with  well 
denned  gular  sutures  I  place  in  the  subgenus  Pycnorus.  The  holotypes  of 
O  parcillelus  O.  boreellus,  O.  caseyianus,  and  O.  provensis,  all  females 
exhibit  the  gular  modifications  as  described  for  Pycnorus;  the  western  forms 
ot  Pycnorus  are  all  considered  variations  of  O.  parcdlelus 


Orus  (Pycnorus)  dentiger  (LeConte) 

Figs.  1,  14,  28,  33 

Scopaeus  dentiger  LeConte,  1880:179;  Blatchley  1910:434. 

Pycnorus  dentiger  (LeConte),  Casey  1905:195,  196;  Leng  1920-104 

Scopaeus  (Pycnorus)  dentiger  (LeConte),  Bernhauer  and  Schubert 
1 9 1  ^  2  4*  7  • 

Orus  (Pycnorus)  dentiger  (LeConte),  Blackwelder  1939a- 105  121* 

1939b:24;  1952:333.  *  ’ 

Pycnorus  iowanus  Casey,  1905:196;  Leng  1920*104  (NEW  SYN 
ONYMY)  *  v 

Scopaeus  (Pycnorus)  iowanus  (Casey),  Bernhauer  and  Schubert  1912:248. 
Orus  (Pycnorus)  iowanus  (Casey),  Blackwelder  1939a:  105;  1939b~24. 

HOLOTYPE  of  Scopaeus  dentiger  LeConte:  Massachusetts;  Museum  of 
Comparative  Zoology;  male. 

HOLOTYPE  of  Pycnorus  iowanus  Casey:  Iowa;  U.  S.  National  Museum- 
female.  ’ 


84 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


Figure  33,  Distribution  of  Orus  spp. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


85 


DESCRIPTION.  Or  us;  (Pycnorus);  piceous;  male.  Head:  .61  mm.  long,  .54  mm. 
wide.  Thorax:  pronotum  .67  mm.  long,  .53  mm.  wide;  elytra  .59  mm.  long,  .64  mm! 
wide,  metatibia  deticulate  mesally;  metafemur  with  eleven  denticles  on  distal  portion 
Aedeagus:  apical  portion  of  parameres  slightly  longer  than  in  O.  parallelus  (fig.  14)! 

VARIATION.  Head  .58  mm.-. 67  mm.  long,  .47  mm.-.57  mm.  wide; 
pronotum  .60  mm.-.72  mm.  long,  .47  mm.-. 60  mm.  wide;  elytra  .57  mm.- 
.67  mm.  long,  .57  mm. -.67  mm.  wide. 

DISTRIBUTION  (fig.  33).  MASSACHUSETTS:  Middlesex  Co.: 
Natick  (May  30,  1930);  Framingham  (Mar.  25,  1944,  Nov.  8,  1941 )  * 
Cambridge;  Tewksbury.  NEW  YORK:  Warren  Co.:  Pike.  NEW  JERSEY: 
Union  Co.:  Roselle  Park  (Mar.  22,  1925) ;  Elizabeth.  MICHIGAN:  Wayne 
Co.:  Detroit;  Chippewa  Co.:  White  Fish  Point.  ILLINOIS;  IOWA;  GEOR¬ 
GIA!?)3.  INDIANA:  Kosciusko  Co.  (June  24,  in  Blatchley  1910:434) 
QUEBEC:  Duparquet  (Apr.  26,  1940,  Sept.  15,  1935,  May  10,  1936)’ 
MANITOBA:  Stony  Mountain  (Apr.  21,  1916);  Winnepeg. 

BIOLOGY .  This  species  has  been  collected  from  sphagnum  moss  at  the 
edge  of  a  Tamarack  Marsh  (Blatchley  1910:434),  under  stones,  soil 
samples  and  on  lake  shores  during  March,  April,  May,  June  and  November. 

DISCUSSION.  Casey’s  Pycnorus  iowanus,  described  from  one  female 
specimen,  is  distinguished  by  the  presence  of  a  prominent  gular  tubercle. 
On  examination  of  4 1  females  of  O.  dentiger,  it  was  found  that  the  holotype 
of  O.  iowanus  is  merely  one  end  of  the  range  of  individual  variation  of  the 
gular  tubercle.  Specimens  from  the  eastern  United  States  and  eastern 
Canada  generally  have  a  feebly  developed  tubercle  with  more  specimens 
from  the  West  having  a  prominent  tubercle. 


Orus  (Pycnorus)  parallelus  Casey 
Figs.  15,  33 

Orus  parallelus  Casey,  1886:227;  Fall  1901:223;  Casey  1905:197-  Lens 
1920:104;  Blackwelder  1939a:  105;  1939b:24. 

Scopaeus  (Orus)  parallelus  (Casey),  Bernhauer  and  Schubert  1912:250. 
Scopaeus  armiger  Fall,  1901:225.  (NEW  SYNONYMY) 

Pycnorus  armiger  (Fall),  Casey  1905:195,  196;  Leng  1920:104. 

Scopaeus  (Pycnorus)  armiger  Fall,  Bernhauer  and  Schubert  1912:246. 

Orus  (Pycnorus)  armiger  (Fall),  Blackwelder  1939a;  Hatch  1957:160 
Orus  boreellus  Casey,  1905:197;  Leng  1920:104;  Blackwelder  1939a*  105- 
1939b:24.  (NEW  SYNONYMY) 

Scopaeus  (Orus)  boreellus  (Casey),  Bernhauer  and  Schubert  1912:246 
Orus  longicollis  Casey,  1905: 197;  Leng  1920: 104;  Blackwelder  1939a-105 
(NEW  SYNONYMY) 

Scopaeus  (Orus)  longicollis  (Casey),  Bernhauer  and  Schubert  1912:249 
Scopaeus  (Orus)  caseyianus  Scheerpeltz,  1933:1265  (nom.  nov.  for  longi¬ 
collis  (Casey),  1905,  nom.  preoccup.  nec.  Fauvel,  1874). 

Orus  caseyianus  (Scheerpeltz),  Blackwelder  1939b:24. 

3  One  specimen  from  the  Horn  Collection  bears  the  label  “Ga.”  I  have  seen  no 
other  specimens  from  as  far  south. 


86 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


Orus  provensis  Casey,  1910: 190;  Leng  1920: 104;  Blackwelder  1939a:  105; 

1939b:24  (NEW  SYNONYMY). 

Scopaeus  (Orus)  provensis  (Casey),  Bernhauer  and  Schubert  1912:250. 

HOLOTYPE  of  Orus  parallelus  Casey:  California;  U.  S.  National  Mu¬ 
seum4;  female. 

HOLOTYPE  of  Scopaeus  armiger  Fall:  Pomona,  California;  Museum 
of  Comparative  Zoology;  female. 

HOLOTYPE  of  Scopaeus  (Orus)  caseyianus  Scheerpeltz:  Lake  Tahoe, 
California;  U.  S.  National  Museum;  female. 

HOLOTYPE  of  Orus  boreellus  Casey;  Coeur  d’Alene,  Idaho;  U.  S. 
National  Museum;  female. 

HOLOTYPE  of  Orus  provensis  Casey:  Provo,  Utah;  U.  S.  National 
Museum;  female. 

DESCRIPTION.  Orus ;  (Pycnorus);  piceous;  male.  Head:  .60  mm.  long,  .54  mm. 
wide.  Thorax:  pronotum  .67  mm.  long,  .52  mm.  wide;  elytra  .70  mm.  long,  .70  mm. 
wide;  metatibia  not  denticulate  on  mesal  surface;  metafemur  with  seven  denticles  on 
distal  portion.  Aedeagus:  apical  portion  of  parameres  slightly  shorter  than  that  of 
O.  dentiger  (fig.  15). 

VARIATION .  Size:  head  .54  mm.-. 60  mm.  long,  .47  mm. -.54  mm. 
wide;  pronotum  .56  mm. -.67  mm.  long;  .44  mm. -.53  mm.  wide;  elytra  .67 
mm. -.74  mm.  long,  .60  mm.-. 74  mm.  wide. 

DISTRIBUTION  (fig.  33).  CALIFORNIA:  Los  Angeles  Co.:  Redondo 
(March),  Pomona,  Pasadena  (Aug.,  Nov.  6,  1909);  San  Diego  Co.:  San 
Diego;  Lake  Co.:  Nice  (June  8,  1940);  Calaveras  Co.:  Murphys  (May  23, 
1936,  at  2500  feet  elevation);  Madera  Co.:  Bass  Lake  (Aug.  2,  1934); 
Tulare  Co.:  Woodlake  (June  23,  1936);  Sonoma  Co.:  Guerneville  (June 
26,  1908) ;  Napa  Co.:  St.  Helena.  IDAHO:  Bonner  Co.:  Priest  River  (June 
21);  Kootenai  Co.:  Coeur  d’Alene.  UTAH:  Utah  Co.:  Provo. 


Subgenus  Nivorus  Herman 

Since  the  recent  publication  (Herman,  1965)  on  the  subgenus  Nivorus 
additional  specimens  have  been  received.  They  represent  a  new  species. 
A  description  of  that  new  species  and  a  new  key  are  presented  below. 


Key  to  the  Described  Species  of  Nivorus 

1.  Postorbital  furrow  contiguous  with  eye -  2 

Postorbital  furrow  separated  from  eye - V0LANS 

2.  Second  and  third  visible  abdominal  sterna  with  a  transverse  impression  containing  a 

ctenidium  -  CAMERONI 

Second  and  third  visible  abdominal  sterna  without  a  transverse  impression  containing 

a  ctenidium - SURINAMENSIS 


4  In  the  original  publication  mention  is  made  of  three  additional  specimens  from 
Napa  and  Sonoma  Counties  that  are  used  for  the  description;  only  the  holotype  is 
in  the  Casey  Collection. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


87 


Or  us  (Nivorus)  surinamensis  Herman,  NEW  SPECIES 

Figs.  13,  25,  31,  33 


HOLOTYPE:  Moengo,  Cottica  River,  Surinam;  collected  by  Boven  on 
May  27,  1927;  male;  to  be  deposited  with  2  paratypes,  a  male  and  female, 
at  the  Cornell  University  Museum. 

DESCRIPTION  OF  THE  HOLOTYPE.  Orus;  (Nivorus);  testaceous;  male.  Head: 
rectangular  in  dorsal  aspect;  dorsum  finely,  indistinctly  punctate,  minutely  sculptured- 
eye  slightly  tapered  posteriorly;  postorbital  furrow  distinct  and  contiguous  with 
posterior  margin  of  eye;  .37  mm.  long,  .33  mm.  wide.  Thorax:  pronotum  finely  punc¬ 
tate,  .37  mm.  long,  .30  mm.  wide;  mesopleuron  and  mesosternum  with  microreticulate 
giound  sculpturing;  elytra  .40  mm.  long,  .40  mm.  wide.  Abdomen:  second  and  third 
visible  sterna  without  a  transverse  impression  containing  a  ctenidium;  penultimate 
sternum  emarginate,  with  a  slight,  median  depression;  depression  with  numerous 
short,  stout  setae;  last  visible  sternum  deeply  and  narrowly  incised  (fig.  13).  Aedeagus: 
parameres  obtusely  attenuate  in  lateral  aspect,  broad  in  dorsal  aspect;  postforamen 
well-developed  (figs.  25,  31). 

DISCUSSION .  Further  differences  between  O.  surinamensis  and  O. 

cameroni  may  be  noted  by  reference  to  the  description  and  illustrations 
Herman,  1965. 


Catalogue  of  Orus 


Orus  Casey,  1884:136 
Orus  s.  str. 

punctatus  Casey,  1884:138 


B.  C.  Cal.  Mont.  Ariz. 
Or.  Wash.  Nev. 


filius  Casey,  1905:200 
pallidus  Casey,  1905 : 109 


sonornae  Casey,  1905 : 198 
shastanus  Casey,  1905:201 


Cal.  Nev. 


pugetanus  Casey,  1905:198 
sinuatus  Herman,  1965:000 
montanus  Fall,  1901:223 
femoratus  Fall,  1901:223 
hemilobatus  Herman,  1965:000 
fraternus  Fall,  1901:223 
distinctus  Casey,  1905:201 
robustulus  Casey,  1905:1995 
pinalinus  Casey,  1905: 1995 
deceptor  Casey,  1905:200'’ 


Cal.  Wash. 


B.  C.  Cal. 


Cal. 

Ariz. 

Cal. 


Cal. 

Cal. 

Cal. 

Cal. 


Pyncorus  Casey,  1 905 : 1 9 1 


dentiger  (LeConte),  1880:179 


Mass.  N.  Y.  Mich.  N.  J.  Ill. 
Ia.  Ind.  Ga.(?)  Que.  Man. 


iowanus  (Casey),  1905:196 


0  Unidentified 


88 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


parallelus  Casey,  1886:227  Cal.  Ida.  Ut. 

armiger  (Fall),  1901:225 
boreellus  Casey,  1905 : 197 
provensis  Casey,  1910:190 
casey ianus  Scheerpeltz,  1933: 1265 

Leucorus  Casey,  1905:191 

rubens  (Casey),  1905:194  Ill.  Kan.  Ia.  Tex.6  Ariz.  N.  Mex.6 

ferrugineus  (Casey),  1905:193  Colo.  Ut.  S.Cal.  N.Mex.  Ariz. 

luridus  (Casey),  1905:193 
ochrinus  (Casey),  1905:193 

guatemalenus  Sharp,  1886  Guat. 

Nivorus  Herman,  1965 : 1 19 

cameroni  Blackwelder,  1943:278  W.I. 

volans  Blackwelder,  1943:277  W.I. 

surinamensis  Herman,  1965:000  Surinam 

Addenda 

I  recently  received  20  specimens  of  Orus  (Leucorus)  rubens  (Casey) 
collected  from  caves  in  Texas  and  New  Mexico  by  James  Reddell,  Bill 
Russell  and  David  McKenzie.  Collections  were  made  from  the  following 
localities:  TEXAS:  Travis  Co.:  Ireland’s  Cave,  15  mi.  SW  Austin  (B. 
Russell,  Apr.  10,  1964);  Tooth  Cave,  15  mi.  NW  Austin  (J.  Reddell,  D. 
McKenzie,  Mar.  15,  1964);  Kretschmarr  Fluted  Sink,  15  mi.  NW  Austin 
(J.  Reddell,  B.  Russell,  Sept.  15,  1963);  Beckett’s  Cave,  1  mi.  S.  Oak 
Hill  (B.  Russell,  Dec.  5,  1964).  San  Saba  Co.:  Gorman  Cave,  6  mi.  SE 
Bend,  Colorado  River  (J.  Reddell,  D.  McKenzie,  Mar.  15,  1963,  in  organic 
debris  several  hundred  feet  from  the  entrance).  Real  Co.:  Skeleton  Cave, 
15  mi.  NW  Leaky  (J.  Reddell,  D.  McKenzie,  Aug.  18,  1963).  Hays  Co.: 
Morton’s  Cave  5  mi.  N.  San  Marcos  (B.  Russell,  D.  McKenzie,  Sept.  9, 
1963).  NEW  MEXICO:  Eddy  Co.:  Milliped  Cave,  20  mi.  N.  Carlsbad 
(J.  Reddell,  B.  Russell,  Dec.  31,  1964,  in  organic  debris). 

Included  on  the  distribution  maps  (fig.  33)  are  records  for  the  species 
of  (Leucorus)  and  (Nivorus). 

On  a  recent  trip  to  California  additional  specimens  and  biological  data 
were  gathered  including  range  extension  for  Orus  (Leucorus)  ferrugineus 
(Casey)  and  Orus  (Orus)  sinuatus  Herman,  locality  data  for  an  undescribed 
species  of  Orus  and  previously  unknown  habitat  data  for  Orus  (Pycnorus) 
parallelus  Casey.  Most  significant  is  that  Orus  punctatus  and  Orus  sinuatus 
may  be  collected  along  the  same  stream  in  apparently  the  same  habitat 
(shore  debris)  and  that  Orus  (Pycnorus)  parallelus  has  been  collected  from 
fungus  whereas  Orus  (Pycnorus)  dentiger  has  been  taken  only  in  soil 
samples. 

Orus  (Pycnorus)  parallelus  Casey.  CALIFORNIA:  Butte  Co.:  Chico 
(March  12,  1960;  from  bracket  and  gill  fungus,  D.  H.  Kistner). 


6  See  addenda. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


89 


Orus  ( Pycnorus )  dentiger  (LeC.).  INDIANA:  La  Porte  Co.:  Smith 
Station  (May  23,  1953,  May  5,  1956,  D.  H.  Kistner) . 

Orus  (Orus)  punctatus  Casey.  WASHINGTON:  Spokane  Co.:  Deep 
Creek  Canyon  (Aug.  12,  1956,  in  debris  at  edge  of  stream,  R.  A.  Ward). 

The  following  collections  were  made  by  the  author. 

Orus  (Orus)  sinuatus  Herman.  CALIFORNIA:  Tuolumne  Co.:  8  miles 
S.W.  Dardanelle  (in  debris  along  shore  of  small  stream  intersecting  Cal. 
rt.  108,  July  13,  1965);  Mariposa  Co.:  0.5  miles  N.  Fish  Camp  at  Big 
Creek  (in  debris  along  shore,  elevation  4982  feet,  July  14,  1965);  Madera 
Co.:  near  Bass  Lake  on  Pine  Creek  (debris  along  shore,  elevation  3425 
feet,  July  16,  1965). 

Orus  (Leucorus)  jerrugineus  (Casey).  CALIFORNIA:  Siskiyou  Co.: 
5  miles  E.  McCloud  (in  flight  between  6:50  and  7:30  P.M.  PDT,  June  29 
1965). 

Orus  (Orus)  punctatus  Casey.  CALIFORNIA:  Siskiyou  Co.:  5  miles 
E.  McCloud  (in  flight  between  7:15  and  8:30  P.M.  PDT,  June  28,  1965); 
Mariposa  Co.:  0.5  miles  N.  Fish  Camp  at  Big  Creek  (in  debris  along  shore, 
elevation  4982,  July  14,  1965);  Madera  Co.:  near  Bass  Lake  on  Pine 
Creek  (under  moss  on  rocks,  elevation  3425,  July  16,  1965);  Tulare  Co.: 
5  miles  S.  Pine  Flats  at  White  River  Camp  on  White  River  (under  pine 
needle  debris  on  shore,  July  19,  1965,  elevation  4146  feet). 

Orus  (Orus)  n.  sp.  CALIFORNIA:  Siskiyou  Co.:  McCloud  (in  debris 
along  shore  of  stream,  June  29,  1965). 


Literature  Cited 


Arnett,  R.  H. 

1961.  The  beetles  of  the  United  States.  Part  II.  Fascicle  15.  Staphylinidae.  The 
Catholic  University  of  America  Press,  Washington,  D.  C.  1112  pp.,  illus. 
Bernhauer,  M.  and  K.  Schubert 

1912.  Staphylinidae  III.  Coleopterorum  Catalogus.  Pars.  40.  Berlin.  Pp.  191-288. 
Blackwelder,  R.  E. 

1936.  Morphology  of  the  coleopterous  family  Staphylinidae.  Smiths.  Misc.  Coll. 
94(13):  1-102,  illus. 

1939a.  A  generic  revision  of  the  staphylinid  beetles  of  the  tribe  Paederini.  Proc. 
U.  S.  Nat.  Mus.  87:93-125. 

1939b.  Fourth  supplement  1933  to  1938  (inclusive)  to  the  Leng  Catalogue  of 
Coleoptera  of  America,  north  of  Mexico.  Mount  Vernon,  N.  Y.  146  pp 

1943.  Monograph  of  the  West  Indian  beetles  of  the  family  Staphylinidae.  Bull. 
U.  S.  Nat.  Mus.  182:1-658,  illus. 

1944.  Checklist  of  the  coleopterous  insects  of  Mexico,  Central  America,  the 
West  Indies  and  South  America.  Bull.  U.  S.  Nat.  Mus.  1 85 ( 1 ):  1-188. 

1952.  The  generic  names  of  the  beetle  family  Staphylinidae  with  an  essay  on 
genotypy.  Bull.  U.  S.  Nat.  Mus.  200:1-483. 

Blatchley,  W.  S. 

1910.  The  Coleoptera  or  beetles  of  Indiana.  Bull.  Indiana  Dept.  Geol.  Nat. 
Res.  1 : 1-1386,  illus. 

Casey,  T.  L. 

1884.  Contributions  to  the  descriptive  and  systematic  coleopterology  of  North 
America  2:61-198. 

1885.  New  genera  and  species  of  Californian  Coleoptera.  Bull.  Calif.  Acad 
Sci.  1:283-336. 


90 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


1886.  Descriptive  notes  of  North  American  Coleoptera.  I.  Bull.  Calif.  Acad. 
Sci.  2(6):  157-264,  illus. 

1905.  A  revision  of  the  American  Paederini.  Trans.  Acad.  Sci.  St.  Louis 
15:17-248. 

1910.  Synonymic  and  descriptive  notes  and  the  Paederini  and  Pinophilini. 
Mem.  Coleop.  1:184-201. 

Clark,  M.  E. 

1949.  An  annotated  list  of  the  Coleoptera  taken  at  or  near  Terrace,  British 
Columbia.  II.  Proc.  Ent.  Soc.  British  Columbia  45:21-24. 

Fall,  H.  C. 

1901.  List  of  the  Coleoptera  of  Southern  California,  with  notes  on  habits  and 
distribution  and  descriptions  of  new  species.  Occ.  Pap.  Calif.  Acad.  Sci. 
8:1-282. 

Gibson,  A. 

1916.  The  entomological  record,  1915.  46th  Ann.  Rep.  Ent.  Soc.  Ontario 
1915:194-230. 

Gibson,  A.  and  R.  C.  Treherne 

1916.  The  cabbage  root  weevil  and  its  control  in  Canada.  Canadian  Dept.  Agr. 
Ent.  Bull.  12:1-58.  (Not  seen) 

Hatch,  M.  H. 

1957.  The  beetles  of  the  Pacific  Northwest.  II.  Staphyliniformia.  University  of 
Washington  Press,  Seattle.  384  pp.,  illus. 

Herman,  Jr.,  L.  H. 

1965.  A  revision  or  Orus  Casey.  I.  Subgenus  Leucorus  Casey  and  a  new  sub¬ 
genus.  Coleoptera:  Staphylinidae.  Coleop.  Bull.  1964  [1965]  18(4) :  1 12-121, 
illus. 

LeConte,  J.  L. 

1880.  Short  studies  of  North  American  Coleoptera.  Trans.  Amer.  Ent.  Soc. 
8:163-218. 

Leng,  C.  W. 

1920.  Catalogue  of  the  Coleoptera  of  America,  north  of  Mexico.  Mount 
Vernon,  N.  Y.  470  pp. 

SCHEERPELTZ,  O. 

1933.  Staphylinidae  VII.  Coleopterorum  Catalogus.  Pars.  129.  Berlin.  Pp. 
989-1500. 

Sharp,  D.  S. 

1886.  Staphylinidae.  Biol.  Centr.-Amer.  Ins.  Coleop.  1883-1887,  1  (2) :  145-747, 
pis.  5-19. 

Treherne,  R.  C. 

1916.  The  cabbage  maggot  in  British  Columbia.  46th  Ann.  Rept.  Ent.  Soc. 
Ontario  1915:140-145. 


BEETLE  TALK 

The  L.  J.  Bottimer  collection  of  approximately  150,000  beetles  was  acquired  in 
March  1965  by  the  Entomology  Research  Institute,  Ottawa.  Specimens  of  New  World 
Bruchidae,  about  40,000,  are  the  outstanding  feature. 

ON  CICINDELA  TUBERCULATA:  The  Maori  name  is  kui,  the  larvae  being  the 
personification  of  the  mythical  Kui  who  lived  in  the  ground  and  was  the  original 
possessor  of  the  land. — David  Miller,  1955,  Native  Insects,  Nature  in  New  Zealand. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


91 


LARVAE  OF  SIX  SPECIES  OF  GENUS  APHODIUS  FROM 

EASTERN  NIGERIA 
(COLEOPTERA:  SCARABAEIDAE) 

By  M.  L.  Jerath  and  K.  L.  Unny1*  2 

The  coprophagus  beetles  of  the  genus  Aphodius,  which  has  world-wide 
distribution,  are  represented  in  West  Africa  by  many  species.  The  larvae 
are  completely  unknown  from  West  Africa. 

In  this  paper  larvae  of  six  species  of  the  genus  Aphodius  are  described 
and  keys  presented  for  their  identification.  The  larvae  of  five  species  were 
collected  in  small  dung  cells  usually  about  3-6  inches  deep  in  the  soil  under 
dung.  Larvae  of  one  Aphodius  species,  however,  were  collected  from  a 
cabbage  bed  in  Obudu  Plateau  (at  an  altitude  of  6,000  ft.)  where  the 
larvae  were  feeding  on  the  cabbage  roots. 

Aphodius  larvae  from  Nigeria  agree  in  essential  characters  with  those  of 
British  Aphodius  characterized  by  Van  Emden  (1941)  and  American  and 
Australian  species  described  by  Jerath  (1960).  The  Nigerian  species,  how¬ 
ever,  differ  from  those  of  America  and  Australia  in  having  only  one  row 
of  setae  on  the  tenth  abdominal  segment.  The  terminology  used  in  this 
work  is  the  same  as  in  the  writer’s  earlier  work  on  Aphodiinae  (Jerath 

l  Q  r\(  I  \ 


Aphodius  Illiger 

LARVAL  DESCRIPTION:  Frons,  on  each  side,  with  two  short  posterior  frontal 
setae  and  a  microsensilla,  a  short  anterior  frontal  seta  and  a  microsensilla,  a  lone 
exterior  frontal  seta  and  a  microsensilla,  and  a  long  seta  at  the  anterior  angle.  First 
antennal  segment  apparently  subdivided.  Clypeus  marked  into  pre-  and  post-clvpeus 
and  with  three  setae  on  either  side.  Scissorial  area  of  left  mandible  with  Srb,  S3  and  S4 
and  of  right  mandible  with  Srf2  and  S.-rK,  Each  mandible  dorsally  with  two  or  three 
se  ae  and  ventra  ly  with  three  or  four  setae.  Galea  dorsally  with  more  than  four 
setae.  Abdominal  segments  1-8,  each  with  three  dorsal  annulets;  dorsa  of  segments 
nine  and  ten  not  divided.  Lower  anal  lobe  emarginate. 


1. 

2. 

3. 


Key  to  Known  Larvae  of  Aphodius  of  Nigeria 


Raster  without  palidia -  2 

Raster  with  palidia;  maxillary  stridulatory  area  with  15-18  teeth;  galea  ventrally 

with  7  short  and  one  long  seta;  raster  with  23-25  tegillar  setae - DETRUNCATUS 

Third  antennal  segment  with  a  flattened  sensory  area  at  apex _  3 

Third  antennal  segment  with  a  conical  sensory  structure  at  apex -  4 

Epipharynx  with  tormae  unequal;  maxillary  stridulatory  teeth  absent  on  palpifer; 
galea  ventrally  with  a  row  of  7  short  setae;  raster  with  18-19  tegillar  setae _ - 


c  .  .  'T"  APHODIUS  SP. 

Epipharynx  with  tormae  more  or  less  equal  in  size  and  shape;  maxillary  stridulatory 

teeth  present  on  palpifer;  galea  ventrally  with  a  row  of  9-11  short  setae-  raster 
with  21-27  tegillar  setae - ' _ NOVUS 


1  Agriculture  Research  Station,  Umudike-Umuahia,  Nigeria. 

r;rt“  aJeT?cex!°  Dr  PauI  °.-  Kdcher  of  Oregon  State  University  and  Mr.  O.  L. 
Uartwright  of  U.S.N.M.  for  reading  this  paper  and  making  valuable  criticisms. 


92 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


4.  Stridulatory  area  with  nine  or  more  conical  teeth;  galea  ventrally  with  a  row  of 

27  or  more  setae -  5 

Stridulatory  area  with  5-6  stridulatory  teeth;  galea  ventrally  with  a  row  of  10-12 

short  setae;  raster  with  34-43  tegillar  setae - VENALIS 

5.  Palpifer  without  teeth,  galea  ventrally  with  a  row  of  34-36  short  setae;  raster  with 

42-48  tegillar  setae  - SENEGALENSIS 

Palpifer  with  two  teeth,  galea  ventrally  with  a  row  of  27-29  short  setae,  raster  with 
58-62  tegillar  setae  - MACULICOLLIS 


Aphodius  (Blackburneus)  detruncatus  Schmidt 

(Fig.  8) 

MATERIAL  STUDIED:  Three  third-instar  larvae  collected  in  soil  at 
Obudu  on  May  28,  1962,  by  M.  L.  Jerath.  Reared  adults  determined  by 
Mr.  R.  D.  Pope  of  Commonwealth  Institute  of  Entomology,  London. 

DESCRIPTION:  Maximum  width  of  head  capsule  of  third-stage  larva  1.24-1.42 
mm.  Cranium  yellowish-brown,  surface  smooth  except  for  three  depressions,  on 
each  side  on  the  frons;  3-4  dorso-epicranial  setae  on  each  side.  Second  and  third 
antennal  segments  subequal,  first  longer  than  second  or  third.  Third  antennal  segment 
apically  with  a  conical  sensory  process. 

Epipharynx  with  protophoba  bistichous  on  left  and  monostichous  on  right;  proto¬ 
phoba  with  19-20  microsensillae.  Tormae  similar  in  size  and  shape  and  both  tormae 
produced  cephalad  and  caudad.  Crepide  subcircular.  Epitorma  asymmetrical  and 
short. 

Maxillary  stridulatory  area  with  an  irregular  row  of  9-11  conical  teeth.  Galea, 
ventrally  with  a  long  seta  and  a  longitudinal  row  of  seven  setae,  dorsally  with  four 
setae.  Lacinia,  dorsally  with  a  row  of  five  long  setae  near  the  mesal  edge  and  one 
short  seta  posteriorly. 

Dorsal  annulets  of  abdominal  segments  1-5  with  setation  as  follows:  each  prescu¬ 
tum  with  six  short  setae,  each  scutum  with  4-5  small  and  3-4  long  setae  on  each  side, 
each  scutellum  with  eight  short  setae.  Each  abdominal  spiracle-bearing  area  with 
1-2  setae  dorsally. 

Raster  with  two  short,  longitudinal  palidia,  surrounded  on  the  sides  by  scattered 
23-25  tegillar  setae.  Each  palidium  with  4-5  caudomesally  directed  spine-like  setae. 

Aphodius  sp. 

(Figs.  1,  3,  4,  7,  9) 

MATERIAL  STUDIED:  Ten  third-instar  larvae,  being  a  part  of  several 
larvae  collected  in  cabbage  bed  at  Obudu  on  May  28,  1962,  by  M.  L. 
Jerath.  This  is  a  new  species  and  the  adults  will  be  described  separately. 

DESCRIPTION:  Maximum  width  of  head  capsule  of  third-stage  larva  1.04-1.24 
mm.  Cranium  light-yellow,  surface  smooth  except  two  depressions,  on  each  side  on 
frons.  Second  and  third  antennal  segments  subequal  but  each  shorter  than  the  first. 
Third  antennal  segment  with  a  round  sensory  area  apically. 

Epipharynx  with  protophoba  bistichous  on  left  and  monostichous  on  right;  proto¬ 
phoba  with  16-18  microsensillae.  Tormae  not  similar  in  size  and  shape,  dexiotorma 
produced  cephalad  and  caudad;  laeotorma  only  produced  cephalad.  Crepide  small; 
epitorma  asymmetrical,  flattened  apically  and  slightly  bent  towards  laeophoba. 

Maxillary  stridulatory  area  with  two  irregular  rows  of  5-9  conical  teeth;  palpifer 
with  teeth.  Galea,  ventrally  with  a  long  seta  and  a  longitudinal  row  of  7  short  setae, 
dorsally  with  3-4  setae.  Lacinia,  dorsally  with  a  row  of  five  long  setae  near  the 
mesal  edge  and  one  short  seta  posteriorly. 

Abdominal  segments  1-5,  each  with  three  dorsal  annulets;  each  prescutum  with 
6-8  short  setae;  each  scutum  with  5-6  short  setae  and  1-2  long  setae,  on  each  side; 
and  each  scutellum  with  10-12  short  setae.  Each  abdominal  spiracle-bearing  area 
with  2-3  setae. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


93 


Raster  with  teges  of  18-19  short  setae  arranged  in  four  rows  of  5-6 
rows  and  3-4  setae  in  the  outer  rows. 


setae  in  inner 


Ligures  1-9,  Larvae  of  Aphodius  spp. 

Aphodius  sp.  1— Head  capsule.  3— Last  antennal  segment.  4— Left  mandible 
dorsal  view.  7— Raster.  9 — Lateral  view  of  8th  to  10th  abdominal  segments. 

A.  senegalensis.  2 — Last  antennal  segment.  5 — Maxilla,  ventral  view. 

A.  maculicolis.  6 — Epipharynx. 

A.  detruncatus.  8 — Raster. 


Symbols:  A — Antenna.  AA- — Seta  of  anterior  frontal  angle.  AC — Acia.  ACP 

Acanthoparia.  ACR — Acroparia.  AF — Anterior  frontal  seta.  BR — Brustia.  CAR 

Cardo.  CL — Clithrum.  CLP — Clypeus.  DES — Dorsoepicranial  setae.  DX — Dexio- 
orma.  EPS— Exterior  frontal  seta.  FS— Frontal  suture.  G— Galea.  H— Hyptomerum. 

wrLirr!;  LA — Lacinia-  LAL —  Lower  anal  lip.  LT — Laeotorma.  M — Molar  area 
MP— Maxillary  palpus.  MPH— Mesophoba.  PA— Palidium.  PFS— Posterior  frontal 
^a-  xf4LA~Pladl.L1Jm;  s— 1 Scissorml  teeth.  SE— Sensory  organ.  SP— Sensory  pegs. 
M — Maxillary  stndulatory  area.  T — Teges. 


94 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


Aphodius  ( Black burneus )  novus  Schmidt 

MATERIAL  STUDIED:  Five  third-instar  larvae,  associated  with  adults, 
collected  under  dung  at  Obudu  on  May  28,  1962,  by  M.  L.  Jerath.  The 
associated  adults  determined  by  Mr.  R.  D.  Pope  of  Commonwealth  Insti¬ 
tute  of  Entomology,  London. 

DESCRIPTION:  Maximum  width  of  head  capsule  of  third-stage  larva  1.08-1.20 
mm.  Cranium  light-yellow,  surface  smooth  except  for  three  depressions  on  either 
side.  Second  and  third  antennal  segments  subequal,  first  longer  than  second  or  third. 
Third  antennal  segment  apically  with  a  sensory  spot. 

Epipharynx  with  protophoba  bistichous  on  left  and  monostichous  on  right,  proto¬ 
phoba  with  22-24  microsensillae.  Tormae  similar  in  size  and  shape  and  both  produced 
cephalad  and  caudad.  Crepide  sub-triangular.  Epitorma  asymmetrical,  slender  and 
slightly  flattened  apically. 

Maxillary  stridulatory  area  with  a  row  of  6-7  conical  teeth,  palpifer  with  2-3 
conical  teeth.  Galea,  ventrally  with  a  long  seta  and  a  longitudinal  row  of  9-11  short 
setae,  dorsally  with  four  setae.  Lacinia,  dorsally  with  a  row  of  five  long  setae  near 
the  mesal  edge  and  one  short  seta  posteriorly. 

Dorsal  annulets  of  abdominal  segments  1-5  with  setation  as  follows:  each 
prescutum  with  6-8  short  setae,  each  scutum  with  4-5  short  and  2  long  setae  on 
each  side,  each  scutellum  with  8-10  short  setae.  Each  abdominal  spiracle-bearing 
area  with  1-2  setae  dorsally. 

Raster  with  teges  of  21-27  short  setae  arranged  irregularly  in  rows  of  4-6  setae. 


Aphodius  (Nialus)  venalis  Schmidt 

MATERIAL  STUDIED:  Fifteen  third-instar  larvae,  associated  with 
several  larvae,  reared  to  adult  stage.  Larvae  collected  under  dung  at  Ajali 
Cashew  Plantation  on  May  15,  1963,  by  M.  L.  Jerath. 

DESCRIPTION:  Maximum  width  of  head  capsule  of  third-stage  larva  1.06-1.14 
mm.  Cranium  light-yellow,  surface  smooth  except  for  three  depressions  on  each 
side  on  frons;  1-2  dorso-epicranial  setae  on  each  side.  First  and  second  antennal 
segments  subequal,  third  slightly  shorter  than  first  or  second.  Third  antennal  segment 
apically  with  sensory  conical  process. 

Epipharynx  with  protophoba  bistichous  on  left  and  monostichous  on  right.  Proto¬ 
phoba  with  15-17  microsensillae.  Tormae  more  or  less  similar  in  size  and  shape, 
and  both  produced  cephalad  and  caudad.  Crepide  subtriangular.  Epitorma  asym¬ 
metrically  flattened  and  bent  towards  the  laeophoba. 

Maxillary  stridulatory  area  with  a  row  of  5-6  conical  teeth,  palpifer  with  one 
tooth.  Galea  ventrally  with  a  long  setae  and  a  longitudinal  row  of  10-12  short 
setae,  dorsally  with  five  setae.  Lacinia  dorsally  with  a  row  of  five  long  setae  near 
the  mesal  edge  and  one  short  seta  posteriorly. 

Dorsal  annulets  of  abdominal  segments  1-5  with  setation  as  follows:  each 
prescutum  with  6  short  setae,  each  scutum  with  4-5  short  setae  and  2-3  long  setae 
on  each  side,  each  scutellum  with  10  short  setae.  Setae  are  very  minute  and  insignifi¬ 
cant.  Each  abdominal  spiracle-bearing  area  with  one  seta  dorsally  and  1-2  setae 
ventrally. 

Raster  with  teges  of  34-43  short  setae  scattered  irregularly  on  the  venter  of  10th 
abdominal  segment. 

Aphodius  ( Colohopterus)  senegalensis  Klug 

(Figs.  2,  5) 

MATERIAL  STUDIED:  Three  third-instar  larvae  collected  with  adults 
at  School  of  Agriculture,  Umudike,  under  cow  dung,  during  April  1961, 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


95 


by  M.  L.  Jerath.  Associated  adults  determined  by  Mr.  R.  D.  Pope  of 
Commonwealth  Institute  of  Entomology,  London. 

DESCRIPTION:  Maximum  width  of  head  capsule  of  third-stage  larva  2.42-2.83 
mm.  Cranium  light-yellow,  surface  smooth  except  two  depressions  on  each  side  on 
the  frons,  with  3-4  dorso-epicranial  setae  and  three  microsensillae  on  each  side 
Second  and  third  antennal  segments  subequal  but  each  shorter  than  first.  Third 
antennal  segment  apically  bears  a  conical  sensory  process. 

Epipharynx  with  protophoba  bistichous  and  with  21-23  microsensillae.  Tormae 
similar  in  shape,  both  pioduced  cephalad  and  caudad.  Crepide  semicircular.  Epitorma 
asymmetrical,  short  and  membranous  apically. 

Maxillary  stridulatory  area  with  15-18  conical  teeth  arranged  in  a  row;  palpifer 
without  teeth.  Galea,  ventrally  with  a  long  seta  and  a  longitudinal  row  of  34-36 
closely  placed  setae,  dorsally  with  4-5  long  and  1-2  short  setae.  Lacinia,  dorsally 
with  a  row  of  5-6  long  setae  near  the  mesal  edge  and  one  short  seta  posteriorly. 

Abdominal  segments  1-5,  each  with  three  dorsal  annulets;  each  prescutum  with 
H-L3  short  setae,  each  scutum  with  14-16  short  setae  and  2-3  long  setae  on  each 
side,  each  scutellum  with  14-15  setae.  Each  abdominal  spiracle-bearing  area  with 
1-2  short  setae  dorsally. 

Raster  with  teges  of  42-48  short  setae  arranged  in  two  groups,  one  on  either  side. 


Aphodius  ( Colobopterus )  maculicollis  Reiche 

(Fig.  6) 

MATERIAL  STUDIED:  Three  third-instar  larvae  and  cast  skins  of 
two  third-instar  larvae  reared  to  the  adult  stage.  Larvae  collected  under 
cow  manure  at  School  of  Agriculture,  Umudike,  by  M.  L.  Jerath,  during 
Jtily,  1962.  Reared  adults  determined  by  Mr.  R.  D.  Pope  of  Commonwealth 
Institute  of  Entomology,  London. 


DESCRIPTION:  Maximum  width  of  head  capsule  of  third-stage  larva  1.77-1.94 
rnm  Cranium  light-yellow,  surface  smooth  except  for  two  depressions  on  each  side 
on  trons.  Second  and  third  antennal  segments  subequal,  first  segment  longer  than 
second  or  third.  Third  antennal  segment  with  a  conical  sensory  process. 

Epipharynx  with  protophoba  bistichous  and  with  14-15  microsensillae.  Tormae 
similar  in  size  and  shape  both  produced  cephalad  and  caudad.  Crepide  semicircular 
epitorma  with  a  flattened  base  but  conical  apically. 

Maxillary  stridulatory  area  with  a  row  of  11-13  conical  teeth  and  two  near  the 
rase  ot  palpifer.  Galea,  ventrally  with  a  long  seta  and  a  longitudinal  row  of  27-29 
closely  pressed  short  setae,  dorsally  with  five  long  and  one  short  setae.  Lacinia 

dorsally  with  a  row  of  five  long  and  one  short  setae  near  the  mesal  edge  and  one 

short  seta  posteriorly. 

,  •50JS?naiInulets  of  abdominal  segments  1-5  with  setation  as  follows:  each  prescutum 
with  8-10  short  setae,  each  scutum  with  10-11  short  setae  and  4-5  long  setae  on  each 

u/th  oan,d  each  scute,lJum  w,th  10"13  setae.  Each  abdominal  spiracle-bearing  area 

with  2-3  setae  ventrally  and  2  setae  dorsally. 

'>o*HSter«  W'th  tugeS  58-62  short  setae  arranged  more  or  less  in  two  groups  of 
setae;  each  group  of  more  or  less  irregular  rows. 


Literature  Cited 


Jerath,  M.  L. 

1960  Notes  on  larvae  of  nine  genera  of  Aphodiinae  in  the  United  States 
(Coleoptera:  Scarabaeidae).  Proc.  U.  S.  National  Museum  111  (3425  )• 
43-94. 

Emden,  F.  I.  Van 

1941.  Larvae  of  British  beetles  II.  A  key  to  the  British  Lamellicornia  larvae. 
Ent.  Mo.  Mag.  77:117-127,  181-192,  illus. 


96 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


LITERATURE  NOTICE 

A  REVISION  OF  THE  GENUS  ZARHIPIS  LECONTE  (COLEOPTERA:PHEN- 
GODIDAE).  By  D.  D.  Linsdale.  Wasmann  Jour.  Biol.  22(2)  :225-260,  3  figs.  1964. — 
The  number  of  species  is  reduced  from  eight  to  three.  All  occur  in  western  North 
America.  The  revision  is  based  on  males. 

SEXUAL  BEHAVIOR  IN  BLISTER  BEETLES  ( COLEOPTERA  rMELOIDAE). 

I.  THE  GENUS  PYROTA.  By  R.  B.  Selander.  Canadian  Ent.  96(8) :  1037-1082,  31 
figs.  1964. — Courtship  patterns  and  methods  of  coupling  are  rarely  studied  in  the 
Coleoptera.  Here  they  are  described  and  used  in  the  classification  of  both  higher  and 
lower  taxa. 

A  COMPARATIVE  ACCOUNT  OF  THE  FEEDING  METHODS  OF  THE 
BEETLES  NEBRIA  BREVICOLLIS  (F.)  (CARABIDAE)  AND  PHILONTHUS 
DECORUS  (GRAV.)  (STAPHYLINIDAE) .  By  M.  E.  G.  Evans.  Trans.  Roy.  Soc. 
Edinburgh  66(5 ): 9 1-109,  18  figs.  1964.  THE  FEEDING  METHOD  OF  CICIN- 
DELA  HYBRIDA  L.  (COLEOPTERAiCICINDELIDAE).  By  M.  E.  G.  Evans, 
Proc.  Ent.  Soc.  London  40(4-6)  :61-66,  6  figs.  1965. — These  are  detailed  accounts 
of  chewing,  swallowing,  filtering,  regurgitation,  and  internal  and  external  digestion; 
only  the  parts  anterior  to  the  mid-gut  are  discussed.  The  works  are  ‘musts’  for 
students  of  predaceous  beetles.  They  are  morphology  at  its  finest. 

THE  TYPE  MATERIAL  OF  I.  C.  FABRICIUS.  By  Ella  Zimsen.  Munksgaard, 
Copenhagen.  656  pp.,  1  pi.  1964. — Includes  4112  beetle  species  names  with  litera¬ 
ture  citations,  number  of  specimens,  their  museum  locations,  and  occasionally  other 
notations.  A  good  introduction  on  the  life  of  Fabricius,  the  Fabrician  collection,  and 
other  collections  are  most  helpful. 

KLUCZE  DO  OZNACZANIA  OWAKOW  POLSKI,  XIX— COLEOPTERA,  98a— 
CURCULIONIDAE:  APIONINAE.  By  S.  Smreczynski.  Polski  Zwiazek  Entomo- 
logiczny,  Nr.  45  serii  kluczy,  pp.  1-80,  157  figs.  1965. — This  is  the  latest  in  the  series 
of  keys  to  the  insects  of  Poland.  It  contains  a  key  to  the  subfamilies  of  the  Curcu- 
lionidae,  a  description  of  the  subfamily  Apioninae,  keys  to  the  subgenera  and  species 
of  Apion,  and  short  notes  on  the  habits  and  distribution  of  each  species.  Previously 
published  parts  in  this  Polish  series  treated  the  beetle  families  Catopidae,  Silphidae, 
Bostrichidae,  Lyctidae,  Lymexylonidae,  Byrrhidae,  Nosodendridae,  Dermestidae, 
Coccinellidae,  Pyrochroidae,  Scolytidae,  and  Platypodidae. 

A  REVISION  OF  THE  GENUS  TRICORYNUS  OF  NORTH  AMERICA 
(COLEOPTERA:  ANOBIIDAE).  By  R.  E.  White.  Misc.  Publ.  Ent.  Soc.  Amer.  \ 
4(7)  :283-368,  153  figs.  1965. — This  genus,  formerly  known  as  Catorama,  now  con¬ 
tains  in  North  America  82  species,  with  25  of  them  being  new.  Almost  all  species  are 
placed  in  1 5  species  groups.  Keys,  descriptions,  illustrations,  and  biological  notes  make 
up  this  long  needed  revision. 

ILLUSTRATED  INSECT  LARVAE  OF  JAPAN.  Edited  by  T.  Esaki,  T.  Kawada, 

N.  Yuasa,  N.  Ishii,  and  T.  Motoki.  Hokuryukan  Co.  Ltd.,  Tokyo.  774  pp.,  1307  figs., 

4  pis.  1959. — This  manual  is  seldom  cited  in  literature  even  though  it  has  been  in 
existence  for  six  years.  It  consists  of  good  illustrations  of  whole  larvae  and  often 
parts  of  larvae  with  a  description  of  each  in  Japanese.  The  section  on  Coleoptera, 
pages  392-545,  is  authored  by  A.  Fukuda,  K.  Kurosa,  and  N.  Hayashi.  Larvae  of 
298  species  of  beetles  are  treated,  some  for  the  first  time. 


—BACK  ISSUES- 

The  Coleopterists'  Bulletin 

Per  Single 

Volume  Issue 


Vol.  3,  1949,  6  issues  (Nos.  i  &  2  o.p.)  $5.00  $1.00 

Vol.  4,  1950,  6  issues  5.00  1.00 

Vol.  5,  1951,  6  issues  5.00  1.00 

Vol.  6,  1952,  4  issues  5.00  1.25 

Vol.  7,  1953,  6  issues  5.00  1.00 

Vol.  8,  1954,  6  issues  5.00  1.00 

Vol.  9,  1955,  6  issues  5.00  1.00 

Vol.  10,  1956,  6  issues  5.00  1.00 

Vol.  11,  1957,  2  issues  5.00  3.00 

Vol.  12,  1958,  1  issue  5.00  5.00 

Vol.  13,  1959,  4  issues  5.00  1.25 

Vol.  14,  1960,  4  issues  5.00  1.25 

Vol.  15,  1961,  4  issues  5.00  1.25 

Vol.  16,  1962,  4  issues  5.00  1.25 

Vol.  17,  1963,  4  issues  5.00  1.25 

Vol.  18,  1964,  4  issues  5.00  1.25 

(above  prices  Postpaid) 

. ATTENTION  READERS! . 

From  time  to  time  we  receive  requests  from  our  subscribers  who 
wish  to  complete  their  holdings  of  the  Bulletin.  We  would  appre¬ 
ciate  it  if  any  readers  possessing  copies  of  Vol.  3,  No.  1,  with  which 
they  are  willing  to  part,  would  inform  the  Bulletin. 


★ 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 

620  Michigan  Avenue,  N.E. 
Washington,  D.  C.  20017 


Send  today  for  your  copy  of— 

“PYGMIES  AND  PYGMOIDS: 
TWIDES  OF  TROPICAL  AFRICA* 

BY 

Martin  Gusinde,  S.V.D. 

JANUARY  1955  ISSUE  OF 
ANTHROPOLOGICAL  QUARTERLY 

•  This  interesting  and  educational  article  is 
based  on  the  author’s  original  observations, 
and  includes  a  complete  bibliography  on  the 
“PYGMIES.” 

Price:  $1.00  Postpaid 
Anthropological  Quarterly 
620  Michigan  Avenue,  N.E.,  Washington,  D.  C.  20017 


Now  in  its  38th  year — 

Anthropological  Quarterly 

(formerly  Primitive  Man) 

Issued  January,  April,  July  and  October 

Some  Recent  Contents: 

Grasshoppers  as  Food  in  Buhaya . P.  O.  Mors 

A  Pygmy  Group  Newly  Discovered  in  New  Guinea.  .Martin  Gusinde 

Eskimo  Reindeer  Herding . Robert  T.  Anderson 

Rock  Paintings  of  South  Africa . Abbe  Henri  Breuil 

The  Assinboin  Horse  Medicine  Cult . John  C.  Ewers 

Treatment  of  Disease  in  the  New  Guinea  Highlands 

Louis  J.  Luzbetak 

( Articles  on  Physical  and  Cultural  Anthropology) 

Subscription  Price  $4.00  a  year  Single  Issues  $1.00 

Anthropological  Quarterly 

620  Michigan  Ave.,  N.E.  Washington,  D.  C.  20017 


THE 


iz 


*7^ 


// 


COLEOPTERIS 

BULLETIN 


05 

J; 


\ 


/ 


VOLUME  12  DECEMBER  /  (No. <4)  1965 

PAM  27 196b  v —  ^  jmw  i!  j  o 

ANOBIIDAE:  Notes,  by  White . • .! -3  km [i  Y  H3 

BRUCHIDAE:  On  Abutiloneus,  6y  Kingsolver .  125 

CARABIDAE:  On  Pterostichus,  by  Ball .  104 

CARABIDAE:  On  Amara,  by  Zimmerman .  123 

EROTYLIDAE:  On  ecology,  by  Graves .  117 

STAPHYLINIDAE:  On  Staphylininae,  by  Moore .  97 

Beetle  Talk  .  124 

Literature  Notice  . 103,  116,  122,  128 


THE  CATHOLIC  UNIVERSITY  OF  AMERICA  PRESS 
WASHINGTON,  D.C.  20017 


A  Quarterly  Publication  Devoted 
to  the  Study  of  Beetles 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS’  BULLETIN 

Founded  1947  by  Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr. 

The  Coleopterists’  Bulletin  is  published  by  The  Catholic  University  of  America 
Press,  Washington,  D.  C.  20017  and  edited  by  T.  J.  Spilman.  It  is  issued  four  times  a 
year  beginning  with  March.  All  business  matters  should  be  addressed  to  The  Cole¬ 
opterists’  Bulletin  at  the  Press.  Manuscripts  and  other  editorial  matter  should  be 
addressed  to  the  editor,  U.  S.  National  Museum,  Washington,  D.  C.  20560. 


Subscriptions:  The  subscription  price  for 
each  annual  volume  of  four  numbers  is 
S5.00  payable  in  advance.  All  sub¬ 
scriptions  begin  with  the  first  issue  of 
the  year  and  those  subscribing  later  in 
the  year  will  receive  the  back  issues  of 
the'-volume. 


Back  volumes:  A  stock  of  back  volumes 
is  maintained  and  may  be  purchased  as 
follows:  3  to  date,  $5.00  ea.;  single  num¬ 
bers,  $1.25  each;  all  prices  postpaid. 
Missing  numbers:  Issues  lost  in  the  mail 
will  be  supplied  free  of  charge  if  notified 
within  three  months  after  mailing. 


Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr.,  Ph.D. 

Department  of  Biology 
Catholic  University  of  America 

O.  L.  Cartwright 

U.  S.  National  Museum 
Washington,  D.  C.  20560 

Eugene  J.  Gerberg,  Ph.D. 

Insect  Control  and  Research,  Inc. 
Baltimore,  Md. 


EDITORIAL  BOARD 

James  A.  Magner,  Ph.D.,  S.T.D. 

Business  Manager  of  the  Bulletin 
Catholic  University  of  America 

Theodore  J.  Spilman 

U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture 
Washington,  D.  C.  20560 

Eileen  R.  Van  Tassell 

Department  of  Biology 
Catholic  University  of  America 


NOTICE  TO  AUTHORS 


Manuscripts  will  be  considered  ONLY 
FROM  SUBSCRIBERS.  Authors  should 
consult  STYLE  MANUAL  FOR  BIO¬ 
LOGICAL  JOURNALS,  prepared  by  the 
Committee  on  Form  and  Style  of  the  Con¬ 
ference  of  Biological  Editors,  and  pub¬ 
lished  by  the  American  Institute  of  Bio¬ 
logical  Sciences,  2000  P  St.,  N.W.,  Wash¬ 
ington,  D.  C.  20006.  The  Bulletin  requires 
that  all  manuscripts  be  prepared  according 
to  instructions  in  the  Style  Manual.  Illus¬ 
trations  should  be  sent  mounted,  and 
numbered.  The  manuscript  should  be 
marked  to  indicate  the  location  of  text 
figures  or  the  position  of  full  page  plates. 

Manuscripts  will  be  acknowledged  upon 
receipt.  As  soon  as  possible  thereafter  the 
author  will  be  notified  as  to  acceptance 
after  review  by  the  Editorial  Board.  If 
the  manuscript  is  accepted,  a  tentative 
date  of  publication  will  be  set.  In  general, 


all  papers  will  be  published  in  their  order 
of  receipt,  but  the  editor  reserves  the  right 
to  use  articles  out  of  order  in  the  interest 
of  a  balanced  magazine. 

The  editor  will  make  no  text  changes 
without  advanced  notice  to  the  author. 
Galley  proof  will  be  sent  for  correction. 
These  galleys  are  sent  out  well  in  advance 
and  do  NOT  indicate  the  date  or  order  of 
publication. 

Twenty-five  tear  sheets  of  one  page 
notes  will  be  supplied  free  to  the  author  if 
requested  when  returning  galley  proofs. 
Reprints  of  articles  printed  free  of  extrane¬ 
ous  matter  will  be  supplied  with  or  with¬ 
out  covers  at  cost.  Reprints  MUST  be 
ordered  on  the  form  provided  when  re¬ 
turning  galley  proofs.  The  approximate 
cost  of  reprints  will  be  supplied  with  this 
form. 


EDITORIAL  POLICY 


Any  article,  note,  or  news  items  likely 
to  be  of  interest  to  readers  of  the  Bulletin 
will  be  considered.  Articles  with  illustra¬ 
tions  are  particularly  desired,  and  in  all 


cases,  descriptions  of  new  species  must  be 
illustrated.  Descriptions  of  new  species  or 
genera  MUST  contain  keys  or  be  corre¬ 
lated  with  existing  keys. 


A  QUARTERLY  PUBLICATION  DEVOTED  TO  THE  STUDY  OF  BEETLES 

The  Coleopterists’  Bulletin 

Volume  19  December  (No.  4)  1965 


THE  GENERA  OF  THE  STAPHYLININAE  OF  AMERICA 

NORTH  OF  MEXICO 
(COLEOPTERA:  STAPHYLINIDAE) 

By  Ian  Moore1 


The  subfamily  Staphylininae  is  treated  in  this  paper  in  the  restricted 
sense  recently  suggested  by  Moore,  1964.  It  includes  only  those  genera 
grouped  in  the  old  tribe  Staphylinini. 

In  the  following  key  certain  characters  are  employed  in  the  Nearctic 
literature  for  the  first  time.  Sharp  (1885:  395)  stated  concerning  Philon- 
thus,  “The  European  species  are  numerous  and  have  recently  been  studied 
by  C.  J.  Thomson  and  C.  L.  Rey,  as  well  as  by  Fauvel,  and  a  result  of  their 
studies  has  been  that  no  European  species  in  which  the  longer  lateral  seta  of 
the  prothorax  is  distant  from  the  margin  remains  in  the  genus.  This  char¬ 
acter  is  certainly  of  great  importance,  for  the  seta,  remaining  as  a  fixed  point 
at  the  outer  side  of  the  thorax,  serves  as  a  mark  to  indicate  whether  the 
lateral  raised  margin  is  deflexed  to  the  underside  of  the  thorax  or  not.”  Cam¬ 
eron  (1932:55)  and  others  have  utilized  this  character.  This  is  an  entirely 
satisfactory  character  for  the  separation  of  Cafius  from  Philonthus  and  its 
allies,  those  characters  used  by  Horn  (1884)  and  subsequent  American 
authors  being  illusory. 

The  separation  of  Gabrius  and  Gabronthus  from  Philonthus  follows 
recent  European  usage,  but  the  key  characters  used  differ  from  those  of 
some  other  students. 

Key  to  the  Genera  of  the  Nearctic  Staphylininae 

1.  Superior  lateral  line  of  pronotum  not  deflexed  in  front,  the  large  lateral  setigerous 
puncture  on  it  or  separated  from  it  at  most  by  little  more  than  the  width  of 

the  puncture  (fig.  l) -  2 

Superior  lateral  line  of  pronotum  deflexed  in  front  so  that  the  large  setigerous 

puncture  is  distant  from  it  by  at  least  three  times  the  width  of  the  puncture  (fig.  2)  4 

Last  segment  of  labial  palpi  not  or  very  little  narrower  than  penultimate,  subfusiform 
or  aciculate  (fig.  3);  anterior  tarsi  usually  with  pale  spatulate  setae  beneath 

-  - PHILONTHUS  Curtis 

Last  segment  of  labial  palpi  narrower  than  penultimate,  cylindrical  (fig.  4);  tempora 

longer  than  eyes,  subparallel;  pronotum  elongate - 1 _  3 

Anterior  tarsi  dilated,  with  dense  pale  spatulate  setae  beneath;  pronotum  with  a  series 

of  four  discal  punctures  on  each  side - GABRONTHUS  Tottenham 

Anterior  tarsi  slender,  without  pale  spatulate  setae  beneath;  pronotum  with  a  series 

of  five  discal  punctures  on  each  side - GABRIUS  Curtis 


1  Associate  in  Entomology,  San  Diego  Natural  History  Museum. 


98 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


4. 

5. 

6. 
7. 


8. 


9. 

10. 


Prosternum  strongly,  longitudinally  carinate -  9 

Prosternum  not  carinate -  5 

Basal  impressions  of  anterior  tergites  much  more  coarsely  punctured  than  rest  of 

tergite -  NEOBISNIUS  Ganglbauer 

Basal  impressions  of  tergites  not  more  coarsely  punctured  than  rest  of  tergite -  6 

First  segment  of  posterior  tarsi  shorter  than  last - ERICHSONIUS  Fauvel 

First  segment  of  posterior  tarsi  as  long  as  last -  7 

Anterior  tarsi  dilated,  second  segment  wider  than  long,  with  dense,  pale,  spatulate 

setae  beneath  -  8 

Anterior  tarsi  slender,  second  segment  longer  than  wide,  without  pale,  spatulate  setae 

beneath;  posterior  femora  of  male  usually  spinose  beneath - BELONUCHUS  Nordman 

Last  segment  of  maxillary  palpi  not  more  than  three  times  as  long  as  wide 

(fig.  7) - CAFIUS  Curtis 

Last  segment  of  maxillary  palpi  more  than  four  times  as  long  as  wide  (fig.  8) - 

- HESPERUS  Fauvel 

Mesosternum  longitudinally  carinate - ONTHOLESTES  Ganglbauer 

Mesosternum  not  carinate -  10 

Last  segment  of  labial  palpi  subfusiform  (fig.  5);  head  and  pronotum  densely, 

umbilicately  punctured  - STAPHYLINUS  Linne 

Last  segment  of  labial  palpi  securiform  (fig.  6);  head  and  pronotum  not  densely, 
umbilicately  punctured  - OCYPUS  Leach 


Figures  1-2,  Pronota,  lateral  view;  a,  large  lateral  setigerous  puncture.  1 — Philon- 
llius  politus  politus  (Linne).  2 — Belonuchus  punctiventris  Casey. 

Figures  3-6,  Apices  of  labial  palpi.  3 — Philonthus  politus  (Linne).  4 — Gabrius 
nigritulus  (Gravenhorst).  5 — Staphylinus  virdanus  Horn.  6 — Ocypus  olens  (Muller). 

Figures  7-8,  Apices  of  maxillary  palpi.  7 — Cafius  seminitens  Horn.  8 — Hesperus 
baltimorensis  (Gravenhorst). 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


99 


Notes 

Philonthus.  Members  of  Philonthus,  Gabrius  and  Gabronthus  have  the 
superior  lateral  line  of  the  prothorax  not  deflected  in  front,  so  that  the  large 
anterior  lateral  puncture  is  on  or  very  near  the  superior  lateral  line.  In 
other  members  of  this  subfamily,  the  puncture  is  removed  from  the  superior 
lateral  line  by  at  least  three  times  its  diameter.  The  first  segment  of  the 
posterior  tarsi  is  as  long  as  or  longer  than  the  last  segment.  Members  of 
this  genus  range  from  small  to  moderately  large.  They  are  usually  somber 
in  color,  although  a  few  are  marked  with  blue,  red  or  yellow. 

After  removing  those  species  listed  here  under  Gabrius  and  Gabronthus, 
this  is  still  a  very  large  genus  in  America  north  of  Mexico.  The  Leng  cata¬ 
logue  and  its  supplements  list  most  of  these.  Hatch  (1947)  has  added  a 
number  of  species  from  the  Pacific  Northwest.  Species  of  this  genus  are 
abundantly  distributed  throughout  the  world. 

Fall  (1916:13)  described  an  insect  from  the  sea-beach  at  Seattle,  Wash¬ 
ington,  under  the  name  Cafius  johnsoni.  Koch  (1936:72)  reduced  this  to 
a  subspecies  of  the  Japanese  Cafius  nudus  Sharp.  I  have  examined  series 
of  specimens  from  both  Japan  and  Washington  and  find  that  this  species 
is  a  true  Philonthus.  The  superior  lateral  line  is  not  deflexed  in  front,  so 
that  the  large  anterior  lateral  puncture  is  removed  from  it  by  less  than 
the  width  of  the  puncture;  the  disc  of  the  pronotum  is  polished  and  impunc- 
tate  except  for  a  series  of  four  punctures  on  each  side.  Koch’s  differentiation 
of  the  two  subspecies  was  based  on  a  single  specimen  from  Washington 
and  some  Japanese  material.  He  separated  johnsoni  from  nudus  by  the  fact 
that  the  former  was  supposed  to  have  the  abdomen  more  sparsely  punctured. 

I  am  unable  to  make  this  distinction  in  my  material.  This  species  should 
be  listed  as  Philonthus  nudus  Sharp  (NEW  COMBINATION)  synonvm 
johnsoni  Fall  (NEW  SYNONYM). 

New  keys  to  the  species  of  America  north  of  Mexico  are  needed,  as 
Horns  keys  (1884)  are  not  easy  to  use  and  new  species  have  been 
described. 

Gabronthus.  The  last  segment  of  the  labial  palpi  is  narrower  than  the 
penultimate  and  subcylindrical.  The  head  is  quadrate-elongate  with  small 
eyes.  The  pronotum  is  nearly  parallel-sided,  with  a  discal  series  of  four 
punctures  on  each  side.  The  anterior  tarsi  are  dilated,  with  a  dense  mat 
of  pale  setae  beneath.  The  species  are  small,  dark  and  very  similar  in 
appearance. 

Twenty-three  species  are  at  present  placed  in  this  genus,  sixteen  from 
Africa  and  seven  from  Asia.  Two  species  are  reported  as  being  nearly 
cosmopolitan.  Members  of  the  genus  are  rare  in  American  collections. 

Tottenham  (1955:178)  erected  this  genus  for  a  small  group  of  species 
formerly  placed  in  Philonthus.  The  type  species  is  maritimus  (Motschul- 
sky).  The  only  record  from  America  north  of  Mexico  is  “thermarum 
Aube"  by  Horn  (1884:198).  Tottenham  (1955:178)  stated,  “There  has 
been  much  confusion  amongst  species  of  this  group;  many  different  species 
have  been  confused  under  the  names  thermarum  Aube  and  maritimus 
Motschulsky.  .  .  .”  In  his  revision,  Tottenham  indicated  that  it  is  necessary 


100 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


to  study  the  male  genitalia  in  order  to  make  identifications.  This  has  not 
been  done  with  Nearctic  material,  consequently  Horn’s  record  is  in  doubt. 

Gabrius.  The  penultimate  segment  of  the  labial  palpi  is  swollen  so  that 
the  last  segment,  which  is  subcylindrical,  is  narrower.  The  head  is  elongate 
— oval  with  long  tempora.  The  pronotum  is  elongate,  parallel-sided,  with 
five  discal  punctures  on  each  side.  The  anterior  tarsi  are  slender  and 
spinous  beneath,  without  pale  spatulate  setae.  The  species  are  moderately 
small  and  of  somber  color. 

The  type  species,  G.  nigritulus  (Gravenhorst),  is  nearly  cosmopolitan. 
Including  nigritulus ,  twenty-six  species  are  known  from  America  north  of 
Mexico. 

This  group  has  usually  been  treated  as  a  subgenus  of  Philonthus.  In 
recent  years,  some  students  have  given  it  generic  rank  (see  Smetana, 
1958:134,  and  Tottenham,  1959:178).  Because  of  the  large  number  of 
species  involved,  separation  of  the  two  genera  is  desirable. 

The  following  species  have  been  listed  in  the  Nearctic  literature  under 
the  name  Philonthus;  all  these,  except  nigritulus,  are  now  NEW  COMBI¬ 
NATIONS:  Gabrius  approximatus  (Hatch),  bernardensis  (Fall),  biden- 
tatus  (Horn),  cephalicus  (Casey),  clunalis  (Horn),  cushmani  (Hatch), 
decipiens  (Horn),  downei  (Hatch),  femineus  (Hatch),  fenderi  (Hatch), 
horni  (Bernhauer  &  Schubert),  linearis  (Casey),  lopezi  (Hatch),  malkini 
(Hatch),  microphthalmus  (Horn),  nanellus  (Casey),  nigritulus  (Graven¬ 
horst),  oceanus  (Hatch),  ottawaensis  (Hatch),  ovaliceps  (Fall),  picipen- 
nis  (Maklin),  punctatellus  (Horn),  seattlensis  (Hatch),  shulli  (Hatch), 
virilis  (Horn),  and  wawawai  (Hatch). 

Neobisnius.  The  bases  of  the  anterior  abdominal  tergites  are  deeply 
impressed  and  strongly  sculptured  with  large  deep  punctures  separated 
by  intermediate  ridges.  The  second  antennomere  is  not  wider  than  the 
third.  As  in  Erichsonius,  the  first  segment  of  the  posterior  tarsi  is  shorter 
than  the  last.  The  species  are  medium  sized,  active  insects  found  near 
water.  Some  are  dark,  but  others  have  colored  sections  of  bright  ferrugineus 
or  yellow. 

Sixteen  species  are  known  from  America  north  of  Mexico,  nearly  twice 
as  many  from  America  south  of  the  United  States,  and  a  few  from  other 
parts  of  the  world. 

Most  of  the  Nearctic  species,  as  well  as  those  of  Erichsonius,  are  treated 
in  Horn’s  key  (1884:223)  under  the  name  Actobius. 

Erichsonius.  Members  of  this  genus  are  unique  among  members  of  the 
subfamily  in  that  the  apex  of  the  second  antennal  segment  is  dilated.  It  is 
about  one-third  wider  than  the  third  segment.  This  character  is  not  striking, 
but  appears  to  be  constant.  The  first  segment  of  the  posterior  tarsi  is 
shorter  than  the  last.  The  species  resemble  members  of  Neobisnius  but 
differ  in  the  fine  uniform  puncturation  of  the  basal  abdominal  tergites. 
They  are  moderately  small  insects  of  somber  color  and  rather  uniform 
appearance. 

Nine  species  are  known  from  America  north  of  Mexico,  and  three 
or  four  times  that  number  from  other  parts  of  the  world.  No  species  are 
known  from  Australia  or  the  Neotropics. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


101 


The  only  key  which  treats  all  of  the  American  species  is  that  of  Horn 

(  ^84:  u23)'  H°m  included  both  Erichsonius  and  Neobisnius  in  one  genus 
under  the  name  Actobius.  New  keys  to  the  species  of  these  two  genera 
would  be  useful. 

Belonuchus.  The  presence  of  a  single  or  double  row  of  spines  on  the 
femora  of  the  male  (particularly  the  posterior  femora)  has  generally  been 
used  to  distinguish  members  of  this  genus  from  other  staphilininids.  How¬ 
ever  in  some  species  the  spines  are  absent.  The  species  are  mostly  medium 

sized  to  large.  The  body  is  usually  marked  in  well-defined  sections  of  black 
and  terrugineus. 

Several  species  are  known  from  the  southwestern  United  States  and 
one  from  the  Atlantic  coast.  Many  species  have  been  described  from  the 
American  tropics  and  from  other  tropical  regions. 

The  genus  needs  revision. 

Cafius.  The  deflexed  superior  lateral  line  of  the  prothorax  easily  sepa¬ 
rates  members  of  this  genus  from  those  of  Philonthus.  The  form  of  the 
maxillary  palpi  differs  little  from  that  of  certain  large  species  of  Philonthus 
The  species  are  medium  sized. 

Species  of  Cafius  are  found  throughout  the  world.  They  are  confined  to 
the  seashores  and  the  margins  of  rivers  near  the  sea.  Two  species  are  known 
from  the  Atlantic  coast  of  the  United  States  and  eight  from  the  Pacific.  On 
t  e  Pacific  coast,  these  insects  are  found  in  masses  of  decaying  seaweed 
sometimes  in  large  numbers.  6 

Cafius  nudus  Sharp  is  removed  in  this  paper  to  Philonthus.  (See  notes 
under  that  genus.) 

Hespei us.  This  genus  is  quite  distinct  from  Philonthus,  not  only  in  the 
strongly  deflexed  superior  lateral  line  of  the  prothorax,  but  in  the  very 
elongate  palpi.  The  species,  moderately  large  for  members  of  this  family 
are  sometimes  brightly  colored.  ’ 

There  are  four  Nearctic  species. 

The  Nearctic  species  were  revised  by  Moore,  1958. 

Ontholestes.  Members  of  this  genus  are  distinctive  in  having  the  anterior 
angles  of  the  pronotum  produced  well  ahead  of  the  central  anterior  margin 
1  he  species  are  large  and  colorful. 

Two  species  are  found  in  the  eastern  United  States  and  Canada.  A  few 
other  species  are  known  from  the  Palaearctic  and  Asiatic  regions.  The 
Nearctic  species,  very  active  predators,  are  found  near  dung. 

Staphylinus.  The  punctures  of  the  head  and  pronotum  are  large,  umbili- 
cate  and  crowded,  with  the  interspaces  generally  very  narrow  so  that  the 
surface  has  a  rough  appearance.  The  abdomen  is  often  very  densely  pubes¬ 
cent.  Most  species  are  somberly  colored  in  black  and  shades  of  brown  but 
a  few  are  brilliantly  marked. 

Specimens  are  found  under  cover  in  a  variety  of  situations  and  may 

sometimes  be  taken  in  flight.  These  large  insects  are  distributed  throughout 
the  world. 

This  name  is  used  here  in  the  same  sense  that  it  was  used  in  the  Leng 
catalogue.  Blackwelder  (1952:357)  demonstrated  that  under  a  strict  appli- 


102 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


cation  of  the  rules,  because  of  previously  unrecognized  type  designation, 
this  genus  should  be  called  Platydracus.  However,  in  1959  the  International 
Commission  on  Zoological  Nomenclature,  in  Opinion  #546,  set  aside  all 
previous  type  designations  and  designated  erythropterus  Linne  the  type. 
This  action  conserved  the  name  in  the  sense  that  it  had  been  used  for 
more  than  200  years.  Thus  the  correct  name  is  Staphylinus  with  Platydracus 
as  a  subgenus. 

Ocypus.  The  last  segment  of  the  labial  palpi  is  said  to  be  securiform. 
This  character  is  not  pronounced  in  some  species,  but  the  last  segment  is 
shorter  and  blunter  than  that  of  Staphylinus.  The  punctures  of  the  head 
and  pronotum  are  small,  simple  and  relatively  sparse,  with  the  interspaces 
generally  much  wider  than  the  punctures,  and  shining.  These  are  all  large, 
dark  insects. 

A  large  number  of  species  has  been  described  from  Europe  and  a  few 
from  other  parts  of  the  world.  No  member  of  this  genus  is  known  to  be 
indigenous  to  the  Western  Hemisphere.  The  following  have  been  introduced 
into  the  Nearctic  region:  O.  aeneocephalus  (DeGeer),  ater  (Gravenhorst), 
globulijer  Fourcroy  and  olens  (Muller) . 

The  only  key  to  the  Nearctic  species,  that  of  Hatch  (1957:173),  includes 
three  of  these  species  as  well  as  the  members  of  Staphylinus  of  the  Pacific 
Northwest. 


Literature  Cited 


Blackwelder,  R.  E. 

1939.  Fourth  supplement  1933  to  1938  (inclusive)  to  the  Leng  catalogue  of 
Coleoptera  of  America,  north  of  Mexico,  146  pp.  Mount  Vernon,  N.  Y. 
1952.  The  generic  names  of  the  beetle  family  Staphylinidae  with  an  essay  on 
genotypy.  Bull.  U.  S.  Nat.  Mus.  No.  200:i-iv,  1-483. 

Blackwelder,  R.  E.,  and  R.  M.  Blackwelder 

1948.  Fifth  supplement  1939  to  1947  (inclusive)  to  the  Leng  catalogue  of 
Coleoptera  of  America,  north  of  Mexico,  87  pp.  Mount  Vernon,  N.  Y. 

Cameron,  M. 

1932.  The  fauna  of  British  India,  including  Ceylon  and  Burma.  Coleoptera, 
Staphylinidae,  3 : i-xiii,  1-443,  7  figs.,  3  pis.  London. 

Fall,  H.  C. 

1916.  Three  new  Coleoptera  from  Washington  state.  Bull.  Brook.  Ent.  Soc. 
11:13-14. 


FIatch,  M. 

1957.  The  beetles  of  the  Pacific  Northwest.  Part  II.  Staphyliniformia,  384  pp., 
37  pi.  Univ.  Wash.  Press,  Seattle. 

Horn,  G.  H. 

1884.  Synopsis  of  the  Philonthi  of  Boreal  America.  Trans.  Amer.  Ent.  Soc. 
11:177-244. 

International  Commission  on  Zoological  Nomenclature 

1959.  Opinion  546.  Designation  under  the  Plenary  Powers  of  the  type  species 
in  harmony  with  accustomed  usage  for  the  genus  “Staphylinus”  Linnaeus, 
1758  (Class  Insecta,  Order  Coleoptera)  and  validation  under  the  same 
powers  of  the  emendation  of  the  specific  name  of  the  species  so  desig¬ 
nated. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


103 


Koch,  C. 

1936.  Wissenschaftliche  Ergebnisse  der  entomologischen  Expeditionen  Seiner 
Durchlaucht  der  Fursten  Alessandro  C.  della  Torre  e  Tasso  naeh 
Aegypten  und  auf  die  Halbinsel  Sinai.  XIII.  Staphylinidae.  Pubbl.  Mnseo 
Ent.  Pietro  Rossi  1 : 115-232,  figs.  1-12. 

Leng,  C.  W. 

1920.  Catalogue  of  the  Coleoptera  of  America,  north  of  Mexico.  470  pp  Mount 
Vernon,  N.  Y. 

Leng,  C.  W.,  and  A.  J.  Mutchler 

1 927.  Supplement  1919-1924  (inclusive)  to  catalogue  of  the  Coleoptera  of 
America,  north  of  Mexico,  78  pp.  Mount  Vernon,  N.  Y. 

1933.  Second  and  third  supplements  1925  to  1932  (inclusive)  to  catalogue  of 
the  ^Coleoptera  of  America,  north  of  Mexico,  112  pp.  Mount  Vernon, 

Moore,  I. 

1958.  The  North  American  species  of  Hesperus  Fauvel  with  descriptions  of 
two  new  species  (Coleoptera:  Staphylinidae).  Trans.  San  Diego  Soc. 
Nat.  Hist.  12:311-318. 

1964.  A  new  key  to  the  subfamilies  of  the  Nearctic  Staphylinidae  with  notes 
on  their  classification.  Coleop.  Bull.  18:83-91,  13  figs. 

Sharp,  D. 

1885.  Biologia  Centrali-Americana,  Insecta,  Coleoptera,  1:393-536,  pis.  1-13. 

Smetana,  A. 

1958.  Fauna  Csr,  svazek  12,  drabcikoviti-Staphylinidae,  I,  Staphylininae  (Rad: 
brouci-Coleoptera) ,  436  pp.,  Prague. 

Tottenham,  C.  E. 

1955.  Studies  in  the  genus  Philonthus  Stephens  (Coleoptera:  Staphylinidae). 
Part  IV.  The  species  of  the  thermarium-% roup  ( Gabronthus  gen.  n  ) 
Trans.  Ent.  Soc.  London  100:178-195,  figs.  31-48. 


LITERATURE  NOTICE 


A  REVISION  OF  THE  NODINI  AND  A  KEY  TO  THE  GENERA  OF 
EUMOLPIDAE  OF  AFRICA  (COLEOPTERA:  EUMOLPIDAE).  By  B  J  Selman 
Bull.  Brit.  Mus.  (N.  H.)  Ent.  16(3 ):  143-174,  27  figs.  1965.— Tribes  and  genera  of 
Nodim  are  described.  64  genera  of  these  chrysomeloids  are  keyed. 


INSECTS  OF  MICRONESIA,  COLEOPTERA:  COCCI  NELLI  DAE.  By  E  A 
Chapm.  Vol.  16,  No.  5,  pp.  189-254,  49  figs.  1965.— COLEOPTERA :  ANTHI- 
CIDAE.  By  F.  G.  Werner.  Vol.  16,  No.  5,  pp.  255-269,  5  figs. — 48  species  of 
coccinelhds  and  only  9  species  of  anthicids  occur  in  Micronesia.  Up  to  this  date  17 
families  of  beetles  have  been  reported  on  in  this  series. 


104 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


TWO  NEW  SUBGENERA  OF  PTEROSTICHUS  BONELLI 
FROM  WESTERN  UNITED  STATES,  WITH  NOTES  ON 
CHARACTERISTICS  AND  RELATIONSHIPS  OF  THE 
SUBGENERA  PARAFERONIA  CASEY  AND 
FERONINA  CASEY  (COLEOPTERA:  CARABIDAE) 

By  George  E.  Ball1 
Introduction 

The  North  American  fauna  of  the  tribe  Pterostichini  is  varied  and 
taxonomically  complex.  Consequently,  the  relationships  of  the  various 
elements  are  hardly  understood.  As  knowledge  of  this  tribe  increases, 
many  of  the  genus-group  taxa  presently  recognized  will  be  modified  in 
composition,  and  many  will  be  differently  ranked.  In  particular,  the 
organization  of  the  largest  genus  of  the  tribe,  Pterostichus  Bonelli,  will 
be  altered. 

In  the  course  of  a  revision  of  the  North  American  species  of  the  sub¬ 
genus  Cryobius  Chaudoir,  I  had  occasion  to  examine  groups  which  con¬ 
tained  species  similar  to  those  included  in  Cryobius.  Among  these  were 
the  subgenera  Paraferonia  Casey  and  Feronina  Casey.  This  paper  deals 
with  the  composition  of  these  groups  and  their  relationships,  judged  on 
the  basis  of  external  morphology  of  the  adults,  and,  in  particular,  on  the 
basis  of  the  structure  of  the  male  genitalia. 

This  study  is  a  contribution  to  the  task  of  defining  the  North  American 
subgenera  of  Pterostichus. 

For  purposes  of  discussion,  I  will  refer  to  these  groups  collectively  as 
the  “ Feronina  complex,”  and  add  to  this  the  species  Pterostichus  shulli 
Hatch. 

Acknowledgements 

The  material  on  which  this  study  is  based  was  loaned  to  me  by  Philip 
J.  Darlington,  Jr.  (Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology,  Cambridge,  Massa¬ 
chusetts),  Hugh  B.  Leech  (California  Academy  of  Sciences,  San  Francisco, 
California),  and  Donald  R.  Whitehead  (University  of  Alberta). 

The  manuscript  was  read  and  criticized  by  Brian  Hocking,  Richard 
Freitag,  Donald  R.  Whitehead,  and  Carl  H.  Lindroth. 

The  final  copy  of  the  manuscript  was  typed  by  Miss  Joan  C.  Shore, 
Secretary  of  the  Department  of  Entomology,  University  of  Alberta.  I 
am  grateful  to  those  whose  names  are  listed  above  for  their  assistance. 

Classification  and  Descriptions 

The  “Feronina  complex.”  The  species  included  share  the  following 
characteristics:  generic  characteristics  of  Pterostichus ;  size  small  (total 
length  less  than  11.5  mm);  articles  1  and  2  of  middle  and  hind  tarsus 


1  Department  of  Entomology,  University  of  Alberta,  Edmonton,  Alberta,  Canada. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


105 


with  a  longitudinal  ridge  on  outer  side,  article  5  with  ventral  surface 
glabrous;  plica  of  elytron  normally  developed;  scutellar  stria  present, 
interval  3  with  two  or  three  setigerous  punctures;  metepisternum  with 
anterior  margin  as  long  as  lateral  margin,  hind  wings  reduced  to  short 
stubs.  The  male  genitalia  are  varied,  but  the  internal  sac  does  not  possess 
large,  band-like  sclerites.  All  of  the  species  inhabit  forested,  montane 
regions,  and  are  found  in  damp  situations.  They  do  not  occur  in  the 
alpine  zone,  nor  are  they  northern:  for  example,  none  are  known  from 
Canada  or  Alaska.  They  are  rarely  encountered  by  collectors. 

The  species  of  Cryobius  are  distinguished  from  the  members  of  this 
complex  by  the  setae  on  the  ventro-lateral  margins  of  the  claw-bearing 
articles  of  the  tarsi,  and  by  the  band-like  sclerite  or  sclerites  of  the 
internal  sac  of  the  male  genitalia.  The  species  are  arctic-alpine  in  distri¬ 
bution. 

Historical  aspects.  LeConte  (1873:306)  placed  the  species  lubricus 
LeConte,  1852,  in  a  group  by  itself  (division  3A),  within  the  genus 
Pterostichus,  thereby  showing  implicitly  that  this  species  was  without 
close  relatives. 

Schaeffer  (1910:  393-394)  described  the  species  palmi  from  North 
Carolina,  declaring  it  to  be  very  similar  to  lubricus,  but  because  of  a 
difference  in  number  of  elytral  punctures,  he  implicitly  erected  a  new 
group  for  palmi. 

Casey  erected  the  genus  Feronina  for  palmi  (1918:  365),  and  the 
genus  Paraferonia  for  lubricus  (1918:376),  recognizing  formally  the 
distinctiveness  of  these  species. 

Van  Dyke  (1926)  described  the  species  Pterostichus  ( Cryobius ) 
pacificus,  and  P.  (C.)  lanei.  Subsequently  (1943:23),  he  changed  the 
name  of  pacificus  to  humidulus,  and  placed  this  species  and  land  in  the 
subgenus  Feronina. 

Csiki  (1930:  675  and  677)  changed  the  status  of  Feronina  and  Para¬ 
feronia  to  that  of  a  section  of  the  subgenus  Pterostichus. 

Hatch  (1949:  81)  described  the  species  Platysma  ( Cryobius )  shulli. 
In  his  treatment  of  Pterostichus  (1953:114),  Hatch  returned  humidulus 
Van  Dyke  to  Cryobius,  but  retained  land  in  Feronina.  This  arrangement 
was  made  on  the  basis  of  form  of  the  posterior  lateral  impressions  of  the 
pronotum:  single  and  narrow  in  Feronina,  double  in  Cryobius.  However, 
both  conditions  occur  in  Cryobius,  so  this  difference  is  hardly  diagnostic. 

In  summary,  the  arrangement  of  these  species  in  1953  was: 

Subgenus  Pterostichus  Bonelli,  1809 
Section  Paraferonia  Casey,  1918 
lubricus  LeConte,  1852 

Subgenus  Feronina  Casey,  1918 
palmi  Schaffer,  1910 
lanei  Van  Dyke,  1926 

Subgenus  Cryobius  Chaudoir,  1838 
humidulus  Van  Dyke,  1943 
shulli  Hatch,  1 949 


106 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


Ball  (1960:124)  following  Van  Dyke,  included  lanei  and  humidulus 
in  Feronina,  and  changed  the  rank  of  Parajeronia  to  subgenus,  but 
neglected  to  consider  shulli.  Now,  these  classifications  are  in  part  supported 
by  genitalic  and  other  characteristics,  but  in  the  main  the  genitalic 
characteristics  suggest  a  different  arrangement. 

The  eastern  species,  lubricus  and  palmi,  although  more  similar  to  one 
another  than  to  any  other  member  of  the  complex,  seem  to  be  too  different 
to  be  included  in  the  same  subgenus.  The  western  species,  lanei  and 
humidulus,  are  also  similar  to  one  another  in  structure  of  the  male 
genitalia,  but  they  are  radically  different  from  palmi  (type  species  of 
Feronina),  and  from  the  species  of  Cryobius.  They  cannot  be  included 
in  any  subgenus  known  to  me,  so  a  new  one  will  be  proposed. 

The  species  shulli  Hatch,  superficially  similar  to  the  above  western 
species  and  to  the  species  of  Cryobius,  cannot  be  placed  with  either  group 
on  the  basis  of  genitalic  characteristics,  so  I  will  propose  a  new  subgenus 
for  this  species.  These  groups,  Parajeronia,  and  Feronina  are  characterized 
below. 

Subgenus  Parajeronia  Casey 

This  subgenus  includes  the  species  P.  lubricus  LeConte,  1852. 

External  characteristics.  A  member  of  the  “Feronia  complex.”  Eyes  rather  small 
(length  of  temple/length  of  eye:  0.31-0.43).  Mandibles  modified:  left  mandible  with 
a  dorsal  protuberance,  scrobe  extending  to  ventral  surface  anteriorly;  right  mandible 
with  a  transversely  directed  groove  in  dorsal  surface.  Pronotum  with  posterior  lateral 
impressions  on  each  side  single,  more  or  less  linear,  and  deep;  posterior-lateral 
setigerous  punctures  on  lateral  bead;  prosternum  between  front  coxae  with  apex 
finely  margined.  Dorsal  surface  of  elytra  strongly  iridescent;  striae  shallow,  5  faint, 
6  and  7  almost  effaced,  except  at  apex;  interval  3  with  three  setigerous  punctures. 
Abdominal  sternum  6  of  male  with  a  prominent  projection  medio-ventrally. 

Male  genitalia.  Median  lobe  cylindrical,  basal  portion  forming  an  acute  angle  with 
shaft  (fig.  1A),  apical  portion  in  ventral  aspect  abruptly  narrowed  before  apex  (fig. 
IB),  apex  a  narrow  lobe.  Left  paramere  very  broad,  apex  rounded  (fig.  1C).  Right 
paramere  about  one-half  the  length  of  median  lobe,  with  apical  portion  sharply 
recurved,  apex  broadly  rounded  (fig.  ID).  Internal  sac  emerging  on  left  side  of 
median  lobe,  extended  dorsally  when  everted;  two  medial  sclerites  (figs.  IE  and  F), 
gonopore  terminal. 

Material  examined.  Three  males,  five  females  of  Pterostichus  lubricus 
from  the  following  localities:  NORTH  CAROLINA.  Balsam  Gap,  Balsam 
Mts.;  Highlands;  Linville;  and  Tryon  (Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology); 
Devil’s  Courthouse,  Balsam  Mts.,  Haywood  Co.  (G.  E.  Ball  Coll.). 
TENNESSEE.  Monroe  Co.;  Unaka  Mts.  (Museum  of  Comparative 
Zoology).  “SOUTHERN  STATES.”  A  single  male  from  the  LeConte 
Collection,  labelled  as  follows:  orange  disc;  lubricus  2. 


Subgenus  Feronina  Casey 

This  subgenus  includes  a  single  species,  Pterostichus  palmi  Schaeffer, 
1910. 

Externa!  characteristics.  A  member  of  the  “Feronina  complex.”  Eyes  markedly 
reduced  (length  of  temple/length  of  eye:  0.60-0.74).  Mandibles  average  for  Pterosti¬ 
chus,  without  special  grooves  or  protuberances,  scrobe  of  left  mandible  completely 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


107 


separated  from  ventral  surface  by  a  distinct  ridge.  Pronotum  with  posterior-lateral 
impressions  on  each  side  single,  narrow,  linear;  posterior  lateral  setigerous  punctures 
on  lateral  bead;  tip  of  prosternum  between  front  coxae  margined  or  not.  Elytra 
iridescent,  striae  of  moderate  depth,  all  equally  impressed;  interval  3  with  two  setiger¬ 
ous  punctures.  Male  with  sternum  6  of  abdomen  without  a  median  ventral  protub¬ 
erance. 

Male  genitalia.  Median  lobe  cylindrical,  with  basal  portion  meeting  shaft  at  an 
obtuse  angle  (fig.  2A);  apical  portion  in  ventral  aspect  tapering  gradually,  apex 
broadly  rounded  (fig.  2B).  Left  paramere  broad,  apex  subtruncate  (fig.  2C).  Right 
paramere  slender,  elongate,  with  parallel  sides,  over  one  half  the  length  of  median 
lobe  (fig.  2D).  Internal  sac  extended  dorsally  when  everted,  with  two  sclerites 
near  gonopore  (fig.  2E);  gonopore  terminal. 

Material  examined.  One  male,  three  females  of  Pterostichus  palmi 
from  the  following  localities:  VIRGINIA.  Stone  Creek,  Lee  Co.;  and 
Pennington  Gap  (Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology).  NORTH  CARO¬ 
LINA.  Mt.  Mitchell  (Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology);  Fork  Ridge 
BRP  445  (D.  R.  Whitehead  Coll.). 


Subgenus  Psendoferonina  Ball,  NEW  SUBGENUS 

This  subgenus  includes  humidulus  Van  Dyke;  and  lanei  Van  Dyke, 
here  designated  as  TYPE-SPECIES.  The  derivation  of  the  name  is 
obvious. 

Externa!  characteristics.  Member  of  the  “Feronina  complex.”  Eyes  of  about 
average  size  (length  of  temple/length  of  eye:  0.20-0.30).  Mandibles  average  for 
Pterostichus,  without  special  grooves  or  protuberances;  scrobe  of  left  mandible  com¬ 
pletely  separated  from  ventral  surface  by  a  ridge.  Pronotum  with  posterior-lateral 
impressions  on  each  side  basin-like,  single,  and  impunctate  (lanei),  or  double  and 
punctate  (humidulus);  posterior  lateral  setigerous  punctures  not  on  lateral  bead; 
tip  of  prosternum  between  front  coxae  not  margined.  Elytra  feebly  iridescent,  striae 
of  moderate  depth  (lanei)  or  shallow  (humidulus),  all  of  about  equal  depth  for  a 
given  specimen;  interval  3  with  two  setigerous  punctures.  Sternum  6  of  male  without 
a  median  ventral  protuberance. 

Male  genitalia.  Median  lobe  compressed,  basal  portion  forming  an  obtuse  angle 
with  shaft  (figs.  3 A  and  4A);  shaft  with  apical  portion  separated  from  basal  portion  by 
a  lightly  sclerotized  or  membranous  diagonal  strip  (figs.  3B  and  4B);  apex  broad 
(lanei)  or  narrow  (humidulus).  Left  paramere  broad,  apex  rounded,  more  (humidulus, 
fig.  4C)  or  less  (lanei,  fig.  3C).  Right  paramere  short,  about  one-third  of  the  length 
of  median  lobe  (figs.  3D  and  4D — note,  both  damaged  in  dissection).  Internal  sac 
(studied  in  detail  for  lanei  only)  protruding  ventrally  when  everted,  with  a  single 
sclerite  near  gonopore;  gonopore  basal,  with  a  large  membranous  lobe  apically  (fig. 
3A);  internal  sac  ventro-apically  with  a  large  microtrichial  field. 

Notes.  The  characteristics  of  the  internal  sac  and  median  lobe  of  this 
subgenus  are  most  peculiar.  Usually,  in  carabids,  the  gonopore  is  terminal 
in  position,  not  basal,  and  in  the  everted  position,  the  internal  sac  is 
directed  dorsad  rather  than  ventrad.  The  shaft  of  the  median  lobe  in 
carabids  is  usually  completely  sclerotized  on  the  ventral  surface. 

In  lanei,  the  membranous  strip  seems  to  serve  as  a  hinge,  the  apical 
part  of  the  shaft  moving  on  the  basal  portion.  I  am  not  prepared  to 
speculate  on  the  functional  aspects  of  these  interesting  modifications, 
but  will  point  out  that  a  rudimentary  joint  in  the  form  of  a  deep  notch 
toward  the  apex  and  on  the  right  side  of  the  median  lobe  is  present  in 
Pterostichus  (Pherypes)  tarsalis  LeConte.  Perhaps,  then,  Pherypes  and 
Psendoferonina  are  more  closely  related  than  we  have  suspected  previously. 


108 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


109 


Figure  1,  Male  genitalia  of  Pterostichus  lubricus  LeConte,  Tryon,  North  Carolina 
(MCZ).  A — Median  lobe,  left  lateral  aspect.  B — Median  lobe,  apical  portion,  ventral 
aspect  C— Left  paramere,  ventral  aspect.  D— Right  paramere,  ventral  aspect.  E— 
Internal  sac,  everted,  left  lateral  aspect.  F — Internal  sac,  everted,  ventral  aspect. 

Figure  2,  Male  genitalia  of  Pterostichus  palmi  Schaeffer,  Fork  Ridge,  North 
Carolina  (Whitehead).  A — Median  lobe,  left  lateral  aspect.  B — Median  lobe,  apical 
portion,  ventral  aspect.  C — Left  paramere,  ventral  aspect.  D — Right  paramere,  ventral 
aspect.  E — Internal  sac,  right  lateral  aspect. 

Figure  3,  Male  genitalia  of  Pterostichus  lanei  Van  Dyke.  A — Median  lobe  left 
lateral  aspect,  with  internal  sac  everted.  B — Median  lobe,  right  lateral  aspect  ’  C— 

Left  paramere,  ventral  aspect.  D— Right  paramere,  ventral  aspect.  E— Internal  sac 
everted,  ventral  aspect. 

Figure  4,  Male  genitalia  of  Pterostichus  humidulus  Van  Dyke.  A— Median  lobe 
left  lateral  aspect.  B— Median  lobe,  apical  portion,  ventral  aspect.  C — Left  paramere, 
ventral  aspect.  D — Right  paramere,  apical  portion,  ventral  aspect. 

Figure  5.  Male  genitalia  of  Pterostichus  shulli  Hatch.  A— Median  lobe  left  lateral 
aspect.  B— Median  lobe,  apical  portion,  ventral  aspect.  C— Left  paramere  ventral 
aspect.  D— Right  paramere,  ventral  aspect.  E— Internal  sac,  everted,  left  lateral 
aspect.  F — Internal  sac  everted,  right  lateral  aspect. 


no 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


Material  examined.  Pterostichus  lanei  Van  Dyke,  male,  holotype, 
Wawawai,  Washington.  Pterostichus  humidulus  Van  Dyke,  one  male, 
Cannon  Beach,  Oregon.  Both  specimens  are  in  the  collection  of  the 
California  Academy  of  Sciences. 

Subgenus  Melvilleus  Ball,  NEW  SUBGENUS 

This  group  contains  the  single  species,  Pterostichus  shulli  Hatch,  1949, 
which  is  here  designated  as  TYPE-SPECIES. 

The  name  of  the  subgenus  is  derived  from  the  given  name  of  the 
describer  of  shulli,  Melville  H.  Hatch. 

External  characteristics.  Member  of  the  “Feronina  complex.”  Eyes  of  average  size 
(length  of  temple/length  of  eye:  0.25).  Mandibles  average  for  Pterostichus,  without 
special  grooves  or  protuberances,  scrobe  of  left  mandible  completely  separated  from 
ventral  surface  by  a  ridge.  Pronotum  with  posterior  lateral  impressions  on  each 
side  double;  posterior  lateral  setigerous  punctures  not  on  lateral  bead;  apex  of 
prosternum  between  front  coxae  not  margined.  Elytra  iridescent,  striae  shallow,  all 
about  equally  impressed,  interval  3  with  two  setigerous  punctures;  sternum  6  of 
abdomen  of  male  without  a  protuberance. 

Male  genitalia.  Median  lobe  more  or  less  cylindrical,  not  compressed,  basal  portion 
short,  forming  with  shaft  an  obtuse  angle  (fig.  5A);  apex  in  ventral  aspect  broadly 
rounded,  asymmetrical  (fig.  5B).  Left  paramere  with  apex  broadly  rounded  (fig.  5C). 
Right  paramere  short,  apical  margin  subtruncate,  less  than  half  the  length  of  the 
median  lobe  (fig.  5D).  Internal  sac  extended  dorsally  in  everted  position,  with 
a  large  lobe  toward  apical  margin,  and  a  finger-like  projection  and  two  small 
sclerites  near  gonopore  (figs.  5E  and  F). 

The  species  shulli  is  most  similar  to  the  species  of  Pseudoferonina, 
but  the  males  are  readily  separated  on  the  basis  of  the  genitalic  character¬ 
istics  described  above.  The  diagnostic  external  characteristics  are:  shulli, 
palpi  and  antennae  rufous,  posterior  lateral  impressions  of  pronotum 
punctate,  posterior  lateral  angles  of  pronotum  obtuse,  sides  curving  out 
almost  directly  from  base,  total  length  less  than  10  mm.;  humidulus, 
palpi  and  antennae  rufous,  posterior-lateral  impressions  of  pronotum 
punctate,  hind  angles  of  pronotum  acute,  sides  sinuate  in  front  of  hind 
angles,  total  length  less  than  10  mm.;  lanei,  palpi  and  antennae  black, 
posterior-lateral  impressions  of  pronotum  impunctate,  total  length  greater 
than  10.5  mm. 

Material  examined.  One  male  of  Pterostichus  shulli  from  Harvard, 
Idaho  (California  Academy  of  Sciences). 


Key  to  Nine  North  American  Subgenera  of  Pterostichus  Bonelli 

(Modified  from  Ball,  1960:78) 

15  (14).  Left  mandible  swollen  toward  apex;  right  mandible  with  a  transverse  groove  in 

dorsal  surface;  apex  of  prosternum  between  front  coxae  margined;  elytra 

with  dorsal  surface  iridescent - PARAFER0NIA 

Left  mandible  not  swollen  toward  apex;  right  mandible  without  a  transverse 

groove  in  dorsal  surface  -  16 

16  (15).  Pronotum  almost  rectangular  (slightly  wider  at  base  than  at  apex),  sides  not 

sinuate  posteriorly - ABACIDUS 

Pronotum  subcordate,  at  least  narrowed  posteriorly,  base  and  apex  subequal  in 
width  - 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


111 


17  (16). 

18  (17). 
18A  (17). 
18B  (18A). 

18C  (18B). 

18D  ( 1 8 B ). 

18E  (18D). 
18F  (18D). 


Fifth  article  of  hind  tarsus  with  a  row  of  setae  on  each  ventro-lateral  margin--  18 
Fifth  article  of  hind  tarsus  without  setae  on  each  ventro-lateral  margin -  18A 


Total  length  less  than  10.0  mm.  - CRYOBIUS  (Part) 

Total  length  greater  than  10.5  mm. - EUFERONIA  (Part) 

Range — western  North  America,  west  of  Montana -  18B 

Range — North  America,  east  of  Montana -  18D 


Palpi  and  antennae  black,  posterior-lateral  impressions  of  pronotum  impunctate, 

total  length  10.5  mm.,  or  more - PSEUDOFERONINA  (Part) 

Palpi  and  antennae  rufous,  pronotum  with  posterior-lateral  impressions  punctate, 
total  length  less  than  10.0  mm. - 1  lor 


Pronotum  with  hind  angles  obtuse,  sides  curving  out  almost  directly  from  base 


- MELVILLEUS 

Pronotum  with  hind  angles  acute,  sides  subparallel  in  front  of  hind  angles - 

- _____ - - PSEUDOFERONINA  (Part) 

Pronotum  with  sides  coarsely  margined,  posterior-lateral  impressions  on  each  side 

broad  - - -  18£ 

Pronotum  with  sides  finely  margined,  posterior-lateral  impressions  on  each  side 


linear  -  18p 

Elytron  with  two  or  three  setigerous  punctures  on  disc - EUFERONIA  (Part) 

Elytron  with  four  setigerous  punctures  on  disc - REFONIA 

Eyes  small,  temples  prominent - FERONINA 

Eyes  normal,  temples  small - MONOFERONIA  (Part) 


Relationships 

The  eastern  subgenera,  Paraferonia  and  Feronina,  are  more  closely 
related  to  one  another  than  they  are  to  the  western  groups.  Further, 
the  presence  of  a  long  right  paramere  allies  them  with  other  eastern 
subgenera,  and  suggests  that  they  are  derived  from  an  eastern  ancestor. 

As  mentioned  previously,  the  subgenus  Pseudoferonina  shows  some 
affinity  with  the  western  Pherypes.  Melvilleus,  on  the  other  hand,  does 
not  appear  to  be  closely  related  to  any  other  subgenus  of  Pterostichus. 

If  the  facts  are  correctly  interpreted,  the  similarities  shared  by  the 
eastern  and  western  species  of  the  “Feronina  complex”  are  the  result  of 
parallelism,  or  convergence,  or  of  the  retention  of  characteristics  from 
a  remote  common  ancestry — characteristics  that  are  at  most  indicative 
of  patristic  rather  than  cladistic  affinity  (Cain  and  Harrison,  1960). 

Finally,  I  want  to  consider  in  a  general  way  the  relationships  of  the 
flightless,  montane  subgenera  of  Pterostichus  of  temperate  eastern  and 
western  North  America.  There  are  no  such  subgenera  occurring  in  both 
areas.  (Lindroth  has  indicated  in  a  personal  communication  that  the 
species  P .  adoxus  Say,  1825,  assigned  to  the  subgenus  Hypherpes,  is  not 
related  to  the  western  members  of  this  group.)  This  suggests  that  there 
has  been  no  recent  interchange.  The  east  is  very  rich  in  distinct,  endemic 
subgenera,  while  the  west  has  a  less  diverse  fauna.  Probably  the  history 
of  these  groups  is  intimately  tied  to  that  of  the  Arcto-Tertiary  flora. 
However,  more  data  on  relationships  of  the  subgenera  of  Pterostichus 
are  required  before  it  will  be  profitable  to  pursue  this  question  futrher. 

Summary 

1.  Two  new  subgenera  of  Pterostichus  are  proposed  for  species  from 
western  United  States,  and  are  characterized:  Pseudoferonia,  type-species 
Pterostichus  lanei  Van  Dyke;  and  Melvilleus,  type-species  Pterostichus 
shull i  Hatch. 


112 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


2.  The  species  of  the  monotypic  subgenera  Paraferonia  Casey  and 
Feronina  Casey  are  characterized. 

3.  The  male  genitalia  of  the  species  of  the  subgenera  mentioned  above 
are  illustrated. 

4.  The  relationships  of  these  subgenera  are  discussed,  and  it  is  con¬ 
cluded  that  the  similarities  among  these  groups  are  not  the  result  of 
direct  common  ancestry. 

5.  The  relationships  of  the  montane,  flightless  Pterostichus  faunas  of 
eastern  and  western  North  America  are  discussed  briefly.  No  subgenera 
are  shared,  so  it  is  concluded  that  the  relationships  are  at  least  pre- 
Pleistocene. 


Literature  Cited 


Ball,  G.  E. 

1960  Carabidae,  Fascicle  4.  In  ARNETT,  R.  H.,  The  beetles  of  the  United 
States  (A  manual  for  identification).  The  Catholic  University  of  Amer¬ 
ica  Press,  Washington,  D.  C.  Pp.  55-210.  58  figs. 

Cain,  A.  J.,  and  G.  A.  Harrison 

1960.  Phyletic  weighting.  Proc.  Zool.  Soc.  London.  135:1-31. 

Casey,  T.  L. 

1918.  Studies  among  some  of  the  American  Amarinae  and  Pterostichinae.  Mem. 
Coleop.  8:224-393. 

Csiki  E. 

1930.  Harpalinae  IV,  pars  112,  pp.  529-737.  In  JUNK,  W.,  and  S.  SCHENK- 
LING,  Coleopterorum  Catalogus.  Berlin  and  ’s-Gravenhage. 

Hatch,  M.  H. 

1949.  Studies  on  the  Coleoptera  of  the  Pacific  Northwest  III.  Carabidae: 
Harpalinae.  Bull.  Brooklyn  Ent.  Soc.  44:80-88. 

1953  The  beetles  of  the  Pacific  Northwest.  Part  I:  Introduction  and  Adephaga. 
vii  340  pp.,  37  plates,  2  text-figs.  University  of  Washington  Press, 

Seattle. 

LeConte,  J.  L. 

1852.  Synopsis  of  the  species  of  Pterostichus  and  allied  genera.  Jour.  Acad.  Nat. 
Sci.  Philadelphia  (2)2:225-256. 

1873.  The  Pterostichi  of  the  United  States.  Proc.  Acad.  Nat.  Sci.  Philadelphia, 
1873:302-320. 

Schaeffer,  C. 

1910.  Additions  to  the  Carabidae  of  North  America  with  notes  on  species  al¬ 
ready  known.  Mus.  Brooklyn  Inst.  Arts  Sci.  Sci.  Bull.  1  ( 1 7 ) : 39 1-405. 

Van  Dyke,  E.  C. 

1926.  New  species  of  Carabidae  from  western  North  America.  Pan-Pacific  Ent. 
2:113-126. 

1943  New  species  and  subspecies  of  North  American  Carabidae.  Pan-Pacific 
Ent.  19(1):  17-30. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


113 


TAXONOMIC  AND  DISTRIBUTION  NOTES 
ON  ANOBIIDAE  (COLEOPTERA) 

By  Richard  E.  White1 


The  nomenclatural  changes  and  extensions  of  known  ranges  offered 
below  result  from  my  recent  work  on  the  Anobiidae. 


Hemicoelus  LeConte 
Hemicoelus  LeConte,  1861 :204. 

Cacotemnus  LeConte,  1861:204.  (NEW  SYNONYMY.) 

The  genus  Hadrobregmus  Thomson  was  synonymized  with  Coelostethus 
LeConte  by  Knutson  (1963:178).  The  North  American  species  formerly 
placed  in  Hadrobregmus  were  assigned  by  Knutson  to  Hemicoelus,  Caco¬ 
temnus  (both  previously  ranked  as  synonyms  of  Hadrobregmus) ,  and 
Desmatogaster  (described  as  new).  The  differences  given  by  the  above 
author  for  the  separation  of  Hemicoelus  and  Cacotemnus  do  not  stand 
up.  The  primary  character  (gibbosity  of  the  pronotal  disk)  I  find  un¬ 
reliable.  In  reference  to  this  character,  the  species  Cacotemnus  defect  us 
(Fall)  clearly  fits  Hemicoelus,  as  can  be  seen  from  examining  Knutson’s 
description  of  the  species.  Some  specimens  of  C.  defectus  exhibit  the 
pronotal  gibbosity  to  an  even  greater  extent  than  does  Hemicoelus  pusillus 
(Fall).  In  addition,  there  exists  no  sharp  dividing  line  between  those 
species  with  the  pronotum  gibbous  and  those  in  which  the  pronotum 
is  supposedly  not  gibbous.  The  additional  wing  and  genital  characters 
given  are  not  of  sufficient  strength  to  serve  as  a  base  for  generic  separation. 
These  internal  characters  are  in  marked  contrast  to  the  generally  strong 
external  characters  serving  to  distinguish  other  anobiid  genera. 

The  generic  names  Hemicoelus  and  Cacotemnus  first  appeared  in  print 
on  the  same  page  of  LeConte’s  “Classification  of  the  Coleoptera.”  The 
morphological  distinction  presented  by  LeConte  (whether  the  antennae 
are  10-  or  1 1-segmented)  is  unreliable  as  has  been  indicated  by  Knutson. 
The  name  Hemicoelus  appears  earlier  on  the  page  and  should  now  be 
accepted  as  the  correct  name  for  the  genus. 


Lioolius  Gorham 

Lioolius  Gorham,  1883:203  (type,  L.  punctatus  Gorham,  by  present 
designation) . 

Nevermannus  Fisher,  1927:116;  1927:49  (type,  N.  dorcatomoides  Fisher 
by  monotypy) .  (NEW  SYNONYMY.) 

A  comparison  of  the  types  representing  these  two  generic  names 
shows  them  to  be  congeneric  but  specifically  distinct.  L.  dorcatomoides 


1  Entomology  Research  Division,  Agr.  Res.  Serv.,  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture, 
Washington,  D.C. 


114 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


differs  from  punctatus  in  having  the  dorsal  surface  very  dark  reddish 
black  (steely  blue  in  punctatus )  and  in  lacking  elytral  striae  (two  present 
at  apical  half  on  each  side  in  punctatus) . 


Dorcatoma  falli  White,  NEW  SPECIES 
Dorcatoma  dresdensis  Fall,  1905:262,  ( nec  Herbst). 

The  European  D.  dresdensis  Herbst  (1792:104)  does  not  occur  in 
North  America.  The  species  designated  under  this  name  by  Fall  is  actually 
unnamed.  I  hereby  propose  the  name  falli  for  this  species  in  honor  of 
one  of  our  greatest  coleopterists.  Fall’s  description  and  key  to  species 
of  the  genus  occur  on  the  above  page,  and  a  figure  can  be  found  in 
White  (1962:49). 

D.  dresdensis  Herbst  (vide  Dominick)  differs  from  falli  in  that  the 
metasternum  is  deeply  foveate  anteriorly,  not  longitudinally  sulcate  as  in 
falli.  Also,  the  8th  and  9th  antennal  segments  of  the  male  of  dresdensis 
Herbst  are  distinctly  triangular,  not  branched  as  in  falli.  D.  dresdensis 
Herbst  resembles  D.  pallicornis  LeConte  in  the  metasternal  characters, 
but  the  male  of  the  latter  bears  branched  8th  and  9th  antennal  segments 
similar  to  those  of  falli. 

The  holotype  of  falli  (male)  was  collected  at  Plummers  Island,  Mary¬ 
land,  on  April  26,  1910,  by  H.  S.  Barber.  It  is  deposited  in  the  U.  S. 
National  Museum  and  bears  type  number  68109.  The  allotype  and 
three  paratypes  (all  females)  bear  the  same  data  and  are  also  in  the 
U.  S.  National  Museum. 

Actenobius  pleuralis  (Casey) 

Euceratocerus  pleuralis  Casey,  1898:65;  Actenobius  pleuralis ,  Fall, 

1905:156. 

Euceratocerus  macer  Casey,  1898:65;  Actenobius  macer,  Fall,  1905:156. 

(NEW  SYNONYMY.) 

Euceratocerus  saginatus  Casey,  1898:65;  Actenobius  saginatus,  Fall, 

1905:157.  (NEW  SYNONYMY.) 

Examination  of  the  respective  type  series  in  the  Casey  collection  has 
shown  that  the  above  names  apply  to  a  single  species  as  suspected  by 
Fall  (1905:156).  The  characters  selected  by  Casey  for  distinguishing 
his  categories,  that  is,  depth  of  the  pleural  sulcus,  proportion  of  elytral 
length  to  width,  and  proportion  of  eye  width  to  distance  separating 
eyes,  are  of  little  or  no  taxonomic  value.  The  series  of  16  individuals 
before  me  exhibit  a  nearly  continuous  range  from  one  extreme  to  the 
other  regarding  these  characters.  Casey’s  types  represent  extremes  of 
these  ranges  with  one  exception.  The  type  and  single  individual  of  A. 
saginatus  bears  elytra  distinctly  shorter  than  those  of  any  other  individual. 
However,  the  noticeably  undulating  elytral  surfaces  and  poorly  fitting 
median  sutures  indicate  a  malformed  individual. 

All  three  of  Casey’s  species  were  described  on  the  same  page;  the 
name  E.  pleuralis  appears  first  so  I  select  it  as  the  name  for  this  species 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


115 


due  to  its  precedence  of  position.  The  specimen  in  Casey’s  series  bear¬ 
ing  the  data  “Sta  Cruz  Mts  Cal,”  USNM  type  label  48851,  and  Casey’s 
determination  label  is  hereby  designated  as  the  lectotype  of  this  species. 


Tricorynus  lepesmei  White,  NEW  NAME 
Catorama  estriatus  Lepesme  1947:228,  ( nec  Horn.) 

C.  estriatus  Lepesme  is  preoccupied  by  Hemiptychus  estriatus  Horn 
(1895:390).  Tricorynus,  Catorama,  and  Hemiptychus  are  synonymic 
(White,  1965:300).  I  propose  the  name  lepesmei  as  a  substitute  for  the 
preoccupied  name  Catorama  estriatus  Lepesme  in  honor  of  the  original 
describer  of  the  species. 


Distribution  Data 

Identification  of  anobiids  from  various  collections  have  provided 
locality  records  representing  marked  or  notable  expansion  of  known 
ranges.  These  are  as  follows: 

Euceratocerus  gibbifrons  White.  This  species  was  collected  at  Florence, 
South  Carolina,  on  May  12,  1959,  by  V.  M.  Kirk.  This  is  a  new  State 
record. 

Desmatogaster  subconnatus  (Fall).  I  have  seen  a  single  individual 
taken  at  Greenville,  Maine,  on  July  22,  1943,  by  Rita  Conley.  This  is  a 
new  record  for  the  United  States. 

Ozognathus  floridanus  LeConte.  Three  individuals  taken  at  Kentucky 
Lake  State  Park,  Kentucky,  on  May  28,  1957,  by  Robert  E.  Woodruff 
have  been  examined.  This  is  a  new  State  record  and  is  a  marked  ex¬ 
pansion  of  the  known  range. 

Euvrilletta  brevis  White.  This  was  taken  at  Poinsett  State  Park,  South 
Carolina  on  June  3,  1962,  by  V.  M.  Kirk.  In  addition,  I  have  seen  a 
series  of  41  individuals  taken  at  Brookings,  Fort  Thompson,  Elk  Point, 
Hills  City,  Vermillion,  Hecla,  and  Spearffsh,  South  Dakota  during  June, 
July,  and  August  in  the  years  of  1942  to  1946.  H.  C.  Severin  collected 
most  of  these,  some  were  taken  by  N.  P.  Larson,  and  one  by  D.  T. 
Murdock.  Both  of  these  are  new  State  records;  the  species  was  previously 
known  only  from  Ohio. 

Eutylistus  incomptus  (LeConte).  I  collected  this  species  in  Franklin 
Co.,  Ohio,  on  July  4,  1962,  and  it  was  taken  in  Tuscarawas  Co.,  Ohio,  in 
June  and  July  of  1962,  by  Bob  Giles.  These  constitute  a  new  State 
record. 

Caenocara  lateralis  LeConte.  Two  males  which  I  collected  in  Ohio 
are  new  State  records  and  the  most  northerly  records  to  date.  One  is 
from  Scioto  Co.,  May  11,  1963,  and  the  other  from  Hocking  Co.,  May 
24,  1963.  They  agree  well  with  males  from  Florida  except  that  the 
antennae  are  slightly  shorter,  with  the  seventh  segment  less  produced. 


116 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


Literature  Cited 

Casey,  T.  L. 

1898.  Studies  on  the  Ptinidae,  Cioidae,  and  Sphindidae  of  America.  Jour.  N.  Y. 
Ent.  Soc.  6(2) :  6 1  -93 . 

Fall,  H.  C. 

1905.  Revision  of  the  Ptinidae  of  Boreal  America.  Trans.  Amer.  Ent.  Soc. 
31:97-296. 

Fisher,  W.  S. 

1927.  A  new  genus  and  species  from  a  termite  nest  in  Costa  Rica  (Family 
Anobiidae).  Proc.  Ent.  Soc.  Wash.  29(3):49-50. 

1927.  A  change  of  name  in  Anobiidae  (Coleoptera).  Proc.  Ent.  Soc.  Wash. 
29(5) :  116. 

Gorham,  H.  S. 

1883.  Ptinidae.  Biol.  Centr.-Amer.,  Ins.,  Coleop.  3 (2) :  194-209. 

Herbst,  J.  F.  W. 

1792.  Natursystem  aller  bekannten  .  .  .  Insecten  .  .  .  (Kafer).  Berlin.  4:1-197. 
Horn,  G.  H. 

1895.  The  Coleoptera  of  Baja  California.  Proc.  Calif.  Acad.  Sci.  4:302-449. 
Knutson,  L.  V. 

1963.  Revision  of  the  genus  Hadrobregmus  of  North  America  (Coleoptera: 
Anobiidae).  Proc.  Ent.  Soc.  Wash.  65(3 ):  177-195. 

LeConte,  J.  L. 

1861.  Classification  of  the  Coleoptera  of  North  America.  Part  1.  Smith.  Misc. 
Coll.  3:1-286. 

Lepesme,  P. 

1947.  Bostrychoidea.  In  E.  Fleutiaux,  C.  Legros,  P.  Lepesme,  and  R.  Paulian, 
Faune  Emp.  Fran$ais,  VII  Coleop.  Antilles  1:194-233. 

White,  R.  E. 

1962.  The  Anobiidae  of  Ohio  (Coleoptera).  Bull.  Ohio.  Biol.  Surv.,  New  Ser 
1(4) :  1-58. 

1965.  A  revision  of  the  genus  Tricorynus  of  North  America  (Coleoptera: 
Anobiidae).  Misc.  Publ.  Ent.  Soc.  Amer.  4(7)  :285-368. 


LITERATURE  NOTICE 

GENERA  INSECTORUM.  COLEOPTERA.  FAM.  COPTONOTIDAE.  By  K.  E. 
Schedl.  Fasc.  215e,  13  pp.,  1  pi.  1962. — The  three  included  genera  are  keyed,  de¬ 
scribed,  and  illustrated.  Citations  to  the  four  species  are  given;  all  are  from  Latin 
America. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


117 


OBSERVATIONS  ON  THE  ECOLOGY,  BEHAVIOR  AND 
LIFE  CYCLE  OF  THE  FUNGUS-FEEDING  BEETLE, 
CYPHEROTYLUS  CALIFORNICUS,  WITH  A 
DESCRIPTION  OF  THE  PUPA  (COLEOPTERA: 

EROTYLIDAE). 

By  Robert  C.  Graves1 


Little  is  known  concerning  the  habits  of  Cypherotylus  californicus 
(Lacordaire,  1842),  the  only  species  of  Erotylinae  known  from  America 
north  of  Mexico.  The  larva  is  described  and  illustrated  (as  C.  boisduvali 
Chev.)  in  Peterson  (1951),  who  also  notes:  “Larvae  associated  with 
fungi  on  fallen  logs  from  Arizona.”  Smyth  (1934),  as  quoted  by  Boyle 
(1956),  comments  as  follows:  “I  at  one  time  collected  a  very  large 
number  of  them  in  one  day,  grouped  around  fungi  on  the  undersides 
of  decayed  logs  in  a  damp,  shady  spot  among  pine  and  alder  trees  in 
Oak  Creek  Canyon,  south  of  Flagstaff,  Arizona  in  August,  1904.” 
Boyle  (1956)  observed  this  species  in  southern  Arizona,  “its  range 
apparently  correlating  well  with  that  of  .  .  .  Pinus  ponderosa ”  He 
further  states  that  “the  gut  content  of  a  dissected  specimen  consisted  of 
bits  of  fungus-riddled,  apparently  coniferous  wood.” 

On  August  7,  1964,  I  discovered  several  hundred  larvae  and  pupae 
of  Cypherotylus  californicus  at  Black  Canyon  Campground  (U.  S.  Forest 
Service  camp  adjoining  Hyde  State  Park),  Santa  Fe  National  Forest, 
Santa  Fe  County,  New  Mexico.  The  elevation  is  8,500  feet.  The  host 
fungus  was  Polyporus  adustus  Willd.  ex  Fries. 

Both  larvae  and  pupae  were  suspended  from  the  underside  of  a  fallen 
aspen  log  about  25  feet  long.  The  larvae  and  pupae  were  grouped  into 
clumps  of  4,  35,  46,  60,  etc.  individuals  each.  One  such  clump  is 
shown  by  fig.  1.  This  log  was  held  roughly  1  foot  above  the  forest 
floor  by  its  branches. 

Larvae  and  pupae  which  hang  freely  in  the  air  may  be  a  modification 
associated  with  high  rainfall  of  the  habitat.  During  my  stay  at  Black 
Canyon  it  rained  daily  and  the  weather  was  damp  and  cold  at  that  altitLide. 
On  Aug.  6  there  was  a  severe  hailstorm.  Under  such  conditions  pupae 
sheltered  by  the  underside  of  a  log  and  roofed  by  shelf  fungi  would  be 
reasonably  well  protected.  Excess  water  drains  from  pendulous  pupae 
and  they  dry  more  rapidly  as  air  circulates  on  all  sides.  This  may  be  of 
advantage  in  reducing  growth  of  molds. 

No  adults  were  found  at  the  site,  but  one  was  captured  crawling  on  a 
pile  of  firewood  in  another  part  of  the  campground.  This  individual  had 
striking  blue  elytra  which  faded  to  grey  after  death.  All  reared  specimens 
were  grey.  Perhaps  unnatural  conditions  in  my  rearing  cartons  prevented 
the  normal  development  of  the  blue  color.  Boyle  (1956)  mentions  a 
“purplish”  color  of  living  specimens. 


1  Department  of  Biology,  Flint  Community  College,  Flint,  Michigan  48503. 


118 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


Figure  1,  Section  of  aspen  log  showing  (A)  roof-like  layer  of  Polyporus  adustus, 
(B)  larvae  ready  to  pupate,  and  (C)  newly-emerged  pupae.  Several  similar  clumps 
of  C.  calif ornicus  larvae  and  pupae  were  located  on  both  sides  of  the  log.  Pupae  are 
suspended  by  the  cast  larval  exuvium. 

Figure  2,  Adult  Cypherotylus  californicus  feeding  (in  typical  upside-down  position) 
beneath  a  fruiting-body  of  Polyporus  versicolor. 

Figure  3,  Adult  Cypherotylus  californicus  feeding  on  fresh,  growing  edge  of 
Polyporus  versicolor.  The  beetles  almost  always  assumed  a  position  beneath  the  spore- 
fruit. 

Figures  4  and  5,  Dorsum  and  venter  of  the  pupa  of  Cypherotylus  californicus 
(Lacordaire).  (A)  mid-dorsal  white  line;  (B)  yellow  humeral  spot. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


119 


Methods  and  Materials 

Larvae  and  pupae  were  freed  carefully  from  the  log  to  which  they  were 
lirmly  attached  apparently  by  some  sort  of  anal  secretion.  Fifty  larvae 
and  pupae  were  collected  for  rearing  and  placed  in  paper  ice-cream 
cartons  with  tight-fitting  lids.  A  few  small  holes  were  punched  in  these 
for  ventilation  and  pieces  of  fungus  from  the  original  log  were  enclosed 
and  moistened  daily  to  prevent  desiccation.  All  larvae  were  nearly  ready 
to  pupate,  and  all  had  pupated  by  the  following  day  (August  8).  There 
were  no  fatalities  during  pupation. 

Specimens  of  larvae  and  pupae  were  also  collected  and  preserved  in 
95%  ethanol.  These  served  for  the  description  of  the  pupa  (see  below). 

Adults  all  emerged  on  August  15  (none  had  emerged  by  evening  of 
August  14).  Although  four  individuals  had  malformed  elytra,  there 
was  100%  emergence,  even  in  the  abnormal  situation  of  the  bottom  of 
an  ice-cream  carton.  None  had  any  difficulty  in  freeing  themselves  from 
the  pupal  exuvium.  (At  the  time  of  emergence  I  was  located  at  Moab, 
Utah.) 

The  newly  emerged  adults  soon  devoured  the  original  fungus  and  this 
was  replaced  by  other  fungi  collected  at  intervals  along  the  route. 

Five  adults  had  died  by  the  time  of  my  return  to  Flint,  Michigan,  on 
September  10.  The  remaining  beetles  were  then  housed  in  a  large 
terrarium  and  provided  with  decaying  logs  covered  with  fresh  Polyporus 
versicolor  L.  ex  Fries.  Feeding  continued  (see  below)  but  the  individuals 
gradually  died;  the  last  survived  until  November  27,  1964. 


Behavior  of  Adults 

The  adults  were  observed  regularly  from  August  15  to  September  10 
in  the  ice-cream  cartons,  and  from  September  10  to  November  27,  1964 
in  the  terrarium.  It  was  not  possible  to  observe  normal  activity  in  the 
cartons  without  disturbing  the  beetles  but  the  terrarium  was  most  satis¬ 
factory. 

Non-feeding  behavior.  Tenerals  were  quiescent  for  about  two  days 
following  emergence,  but,  as  the  cuticle  hardened,  they  became  more 
active,  walking  about  in  a  methodical,  mechanical  fashion  if  disturbed. 
If  not  disturbed,  resting,  feeding  activity  (see  below),  and  slow  move¬ 
ments  were  the  only  behavior.  C.  californicus  is  not  an  active  species 
but  individuals  can  crawl  rather  rapidly  when  irritated.  The  long 
ungainly-appearing  legs  are  beautifully  adapted  for  carrying  the  animals 
over  the  rough  bark  of  logs  and  fungus  fruiting-bodies  which  form  their 
habitat.  When  walking,  the  body  is  held  well  away  from  the  substrate; 
when  resting  upright  or  in  a  crevice,  the  legs  are  drawn  up  and  the 
body  is  appressed  closely  to  the  substrate. 

These  beetles  spend  a  great  portion  of  their  time  on  the  dark,  under¬ 
sides  of  logs.  There,  whether  feeding  or  resting,  they  hang  in  a  character¬ 
istic  upside-down  position  (fig.  2).  In  this  common  posture  they 
frequently  hang  by  only  three  or  four  legs.  Again  the  long  legs  serve  the 
purpose  well,  allowing  air  to  circulate  freely  around  the  body.  As 


120 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


is  the  case  with  larvae  and  pupae,  this  may  be  an  adaptation  to  the 
rainy  climate,  allowing  water  to  drain  and  permitting  more  rapid  drying. 

No  mating  activity  was  observed.  None  of  the  individuals  were  seen 
to  fly.  Rarely,  during  the  day,  one  would  crawl  to  the  top  of  the  log, 
elevate  the  elytra  and  stretch  the  metathoracic  wings  as  if  to  take  off.  The 
wings  appear  perfectly  capable  of  flight  which  undoubtedly  occurs  under 
the  correct  conditions. 

On  numerous  occasions  in  the  terrarium,  smaller  arthropods  such  as 
ants,  spiders,  isopods,  etc.  crawled  over  Cypherotylus  individuals  without 
eliciting  any  noticeable  response.  Once  a  small  spider  ran  up  a  leg 
and  onto  the  elytra;  it  was  wiped  off  by  leg  action.  The  body  is  frequently 
scraped  clean  by  the  long  legs  and  the  legs  are  rubbed  together  during 
cleaning  activity. 

Most  activity  consisted  of  feeding  (see  below)  and  resting  motionless 
for  long  periods.  General  activity  lessened  progressively  with  age. 

Feeding  activity.  In  no  case  was  there  cannibalism,  nor  were  there 
any  attacks  on  one  another  and  no  appendages  were  lost.  Even  in  the 
crowded  ice-cream  cartons,  individuals  lived  in  complete  peace,  crawling 
over  each  other  with  no  sign  of  aggressive  behavior.  Dead  or  moribund 
beetles  were  not  molested. 

Feeding  was  limited  to  soft  polypores  (Basidiomycetes:  Polyporaceae) 
similar  to  those  found  in  such  abundance  on  the  original  log.  Soft  agarics 
were  presented  but  refused  after  inspection  with  the  antennae.  The  beetles 
fed  first  on  the  tender  young  “nubbins”  (“stage  I”  of  Graves,  1960), 
next  on  the  fresh,  growing  edges  of  the  older  conks  (always  feeding  from 
the  underside  of  the  shelf-fungus,  fig.  3).  Young  sporocarps  were  com¬ 
pletely  devoured  down  to  the  bark  of  the  tree;  in  the  case  of  older  conks 
the  pore  layers  were  completely  destroyed  but  the  tough,  leathery  caps 
were  not  eaten. 

Feeding  was  voracious  and  the  colony  consumed  an  enormous  amount 
of  fungi.  C.  calijornicus  may  be  of  some  value  in  the  control  of  wood¬ 
damaging  fungi  as  they  rapidly  destroy  the  sporocarps  before  spore 
production  occurs.  I  know  of  no  other  polypore  feeder  which  is  effective 
in  this  manner  (Graves,  1960).  It  is  still  difficult  to  believe  that  such 
an  inactive  species  should  require  so  much  food.  Perhaps  the  fungi  are 
of  little  nutritional  value  or  the  beetles’  digestion  is  not  efficient.  Farge 
amounts  of  feces  were  produced,  identical  in  color  to  the  conk  and 
quite  fine  and  dry,  resembling  sawdust.  Dry  or  hard  fungi  were  not 
eaten,  nor  was  wood. 


Fife  Cycle 

C.  californicus,  like  other  erotylids,  is  closely  associated  with  fungi, 
and  must  be  termed  a  “mycetobiont”  or  “obligative  mycetocole”  (see 
Graves,  1960).  I  did  not  observe  oviposition,  nor  find  early  larval  stages 
although  I  took  the  log  apart.  When  sifted  over  hardware  cloth  onto 
a  sheet,  the  fungi  yielded  Collembola,  Cisidae  and  several  beetle  larvae, 
but  no  Cypherotylus.  It  seems  apparent  that  this  species  does  not  have 
overlapping  broods. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


121 


The  life  cycle  may  be  reconstructed  from  the  available  data.  Eggs 
are  laid  on  or  near  the  host  fungi  and  the  larvae  feed  on  these  fungi 
throughout  their  development.  The  black,  mature  larvae  leave  the  fungi, 
attach  to  the  underside  of  the  log  and  pupate.  The  larval  exuvium  splits 
dorsally  but  is  not  completely  shed,  remaining  attached  to  the  posterior 
end  of  the  pupa.  The  pupa  is  thus  suspended  freely  from  the  log  by 
the  old  larval  exuvium,  and,  therefore,  hangs  lower  than  the  larvae. 
In  all  cases,  both  larvae  and  pupae  hang  with  the  ventral  side  facing 
the  log,  presenting  the  dark  dorsal  side  to  view. 

The  pupal  stage  of  the  Black  Canyon  specimens  lasted  one  week  but 
the  time  undoubtedly  varies  with  local  conditions.  The  adults  emerge, 
move  into  the  fungus,  mate,  oviposit  and  the  life  cycle  is  repeated.  The 
close  timing  of  emergence  indicates  that  all  developed  from  eggs  laid 
at  approximately  the  same  time.  This  would  ensure  no  difficulty  in 
finding  mates.  After  mating,  a  number  of  females  probably  fly  to  oviposit 
on  suitable  fungi  in  other  parts  of  the  forest. 

Had  it  been  possible  to  provide  the  original  conditions,  the  captured 
beetles  probably  would  have  oviposited  in  late  August  or  September. 
The  young  larvae  probably  hibernate  in  the  fungus  and  develop  rapidly 
during  the  following  spring  and  early  summer,  pupating  in  early  August. 
Adults  emerge  in  mid-August.  Although  the  captured  adults  fed  readily, 
none  survived  November,  so  it  is  likely  that  the  adults  do  not  hibernate. 


Description  of  Pupa 
(Figs.  4  and  5) 

Total  length  15  mm.;  width  6  mm.  With  numerous  stiff  spines  or  styli  (sometimes 
branched)  which  bear  a  small  seta  at  tip.  Color:  white  (with  dark  brown  styli)  in 
recently  pupated  specimens,  becoming  dark  brown  with  age,  except  for  sternites,  a 
distinct  white  line  from  clypeus  onto  mesonotum  (fig.  4),  and  two  elliptical  yellow 
humeral  spots  (fig.  4). 

Head  with  two  pairs  of  large  styli  between  eyes,  two  pairs  of  large  supraorbital 
styli  (somewhat  variable),  a  number  of  scattered  medium  and  small  styli  on  vertex. 
Small  styli  border  lateral  margins  of  eyes. 

Pronotum  bordered  with  numerous  large  styli  which  are  often  curved  and  some¬ 
times  branched.  Mesonotum  with  a  few  large  styli  on  disc  and  others  along  elytral 
buds.  Metanotum  with  large  and  small  styli  scattered  on  disc.  Thoracic  and  ab¬ 
dominal  tergites  with  pairs  of  “central  styli”  on  discs;  these  are  usually  (but  not  al¬ 
ways)  larger  than  surrounding  discal  styli  and  are  often  bifid  or  trifid;  they  can  be 
identified  by  their  position,  forming  two  distinct  dorsal  rows. 

Abdomen  with  first  four  visible  tergites  having  prominent  papillate  spiracles  and 
very  large  laterally-projecting  dendritic  styli.  Posterior  segments  with  greatly  reduced, 
scarcely  visible  spiracles,  without  dendritic  styli.  Last  segment  with  two  urogomphi 
(much  shorter  than  those  of  larva,  which  are  almost  half  body  length). 

Legs  and  antennae  flattened  against  body.  Legs  with  a  few  styli  at  femoro-tibial 
joint.  Venter  glabrous. 

While  all  the  abdominal  spiracles  are  prominent  in  the  larva  and 
adult,  only  the  first  four  appear  to  be  functional  in  the  pupa.  Also  the 
large  dendritic  spines  laterad  to  the  spiracles  are  present  on  abdominal 
segments  1-8  in  the  larva  but  only  on  segments  1-4  in  the  pupa.  Are 
these  protective  to  the  spiracles,  perhaps  keeping  them  separated  from 
foreign  surfaces? 


122 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


The  last  larval  exuvium  continues  to  cover  the  posterior  half  of  the 
abdomen,  so  it  is  doubtful  that  the  posterior  abdominal  spiracles,  even  if 
functional,  would  be  of  much  use. 

Acknowledgement 

I  wish  to  thank  Dr.  Josiah  L.  Lowe  of  the  State  University  College  of  Forestry, 
Syracuse,  N.  Y.,  for  his  determinations  of  the  host  fungi. 


Literature  Cited 

Boyle,  W.  Wayne 

1956.  A  revision  of  the  Erotylidae  of  America  north  of  Mexico  (Coleoptera). 
Bull.  Amer.  Mus.  Nat.  Hist.  110  (2 ) :  6 1  - 172. 

Graves,  Robert  C. 

1960.  Ecological  observations  on  the  insects  and  other  inhabitants  of  woody 
shelf  fungi  (Basidiomycetes:  Polyporaceae)  in  the  Chicago  area.  Ann. 
Ent.  Soc.  Amer.  53:61-78. 

Smyth,  E.  Graywood 

1934.  The  gregarious  habit  of  beetles.  Jour.  Kans.  Ent.  Soc.  7 : 102-1 19. 

Peterson,  Alvah 

1951.  Larvae  of  insects.  Part  II.  Coleoptera,  Diptera,  Neuroptera,  Siphonaptera, 
Mecoptera,  Trichoptera.  Columbus,  Ohio.  416  pp. 


LITERATURE  NOTICE 

LOWER  CALIFORNIA  GUIDEBOOK.  By  Peter  Gerhard  and  Howard  E.  Gulick. 
Arthur  H.  Clark  Co.,  Glendale,  California.  3rd  edition.  243  pp.,  21  maps,  illus.  1964. 
— Baja  California  has  always  been  of  interest  to  entomologists,  and  that  interest 
seems  to  be  increasing  recently.  Therefore,  this  book  could  be  of  value  to  many.  It 
is  a  descriptive  traveler’s  guide,  composed  mostly  of  short  descriptions  of  places  along 
all  roads,  with  consecutive  mileage  marked  for  each  place.  It  is  not  a  scientific 
description  of  the  peninsula — only  1 1  pages  are  devoted  to  descriptions  of  some 
game  animals  and  distinctive  plants — but  interested  scientists  will  make  good  use  of 
it  as  a  guide  and  gazetteer;  more  than  800  localities  are  listed.  A  good  index  and 
very  good  maps  round  out  the  contents;  taxonomists  with  difficult  locality  labels  from 
Baja  will  like  that. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


123 


ILLUSTRATIONS  OF  THREE  HIMALAYAN  AMARA 
(COLEOPTERA:  CARABIDAE) 

By  Elwood  C.  Zimmerman1 


Many  years  ago,  I  acquired  part  of  the  library  of  the  late  H.  E. 
Andrewes,  former  specialist  on  the  Carabidae  at  the  British  Museum 
(Natural  History).  Amongst  the  literature  were  a  number  of  original 
illustrations  of  Carabidae,  including  those  used  by  Andrewes  in  his  contri¬ 
butions  to  The  Fauna  Of  British  India.  Most  of  the  illustrations  have 
been  published,  but  the  material  includes  an  envelope  containing  three 
drawings  of  Amara  from  Tibet  and  Sikkim,  and  on  which  there  is  the 
following  note  by  Andrewes: 

“They  represent  3  species  of  Amara  (all  unique)  described  by  me  in 
Trans.  Ent.  Soc.  Lond.  1930,  pp.  25  [and  28],  &  were  prepared  in  order 
to  assist  Mr.  A.  Baliani  in  preparing  his  paper  on  the  Himalayan  species 
(Mem.  Soc.  Ent.  Ital.  XII.  1933  [1934],  pp.  187-208).  It  was  supposed 
that  he  would  prepare  a  key  to  the  species,  &  publish  these  figures,  but 
he  did  neither.  It  is  my  intention  at  some  future  date  to  try  and  prepare 
a  key  myself,  &  at  the  same  time  publish  these  drawings,  but  I  may 
never  succeed  in  doing  this.  Feb.  15,  1934.” 

It  is  unfortunate  that  Andrewes,  who  had  such  an  expert  knowledge 
of  the  Oriental  Carabidae,  was  unable  to  prepare  his  proposed  illustrated 
key  to  the  Himalayan  Amara,  and  I  believe  that  the  drawings  under 
discussion  should  be  rescued  from  oblivion  and  made  available  to  science. 


Figures  1-3.  Holotypes  of  Himalayan  Carabidae.  1 — Amara  alecto  Andrewes; 
length:  6.0  mm.  2 — Amara  (Brady tus)  mitis  Andrewes;  length:  7.5  mm.  3 — Amara 
histrio  Andrewes;  length:  5.3  mm.  Drawn  by  O.  F.  Tassart. 


1  Bishop  Museum,  Honolulu,  Hawaii. 


124 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


Herewith,  therefore,  the  illustrations  are  reproduced.  These  drawings 
were  made  in  1933  at  the  British  Museum  (Natural  History)  by  the  late 
Miss  O.  F.  Tassart.  Each  of  them  represents  the  holotype  which  is 
stored  in  the  Museum.  The  specimens  were  collected  by  Major  R.  W.  G. 
Hingston  during  the  British  Third  Mount  Everest  Expedition  in  1924. 
The  species  are  as  follows: 

1.  Amara  alecto  Andrewes  (fig.  1).  Kampa  Dzong,  Tibet;  holotype 
male. 

2.  Amara  ( Bradytus )  mitis  Andrewes  (fig.  2).  Rongshar  Valley,  Tibet; 
holotype  male.  It  is  stated  in  the  original  description  that  the  length  is 
“8  mm.,”  but  the  artist  has  stated  that  the  length  is  7.5  mm. 

3.  Amara  histrio  Andrewes  (fig.  3).  Deutang,  Sikkim;  holotype  male. 
The  length  given  in  the  original  description  is  “5.5  mm.,”  but  the  artist’s 
measurement  is  5.3  mm. 

These  drawings,  together  with  other  Andrewes’  illustrations,  are  to 
be  deposited  in  the  library  of  the  Entomology  Department  of  the  British 
Museum. 


'9 


BEETLE  TALK 

Boundaries  of  political  divisions,  usually  Territories,  in  the  western  United  States 
before  1865  were  very  different  from  the  present  boundaries  of  the  States.  This  often 
creates  problems  or  misleads  when  one  tries  to  interpret  type  localities  of  species 
described  or  collected  before  1865.  For  example,  a  specimen  collected  between  1854 
and  1861  and  having  the  locality  label  Nebraska  might  have  come  from  the  far 
northwestern  corner  of  the  present  state  of  Montana.  Also,  between  1850  and  1861 
the  locality  Utah  included  all  of  the  present  States  of  Nevada  and  Utah  and  the 
western  half  of  the  present  State  of  Colorado.  These  facts  can  be  important  to 
coleopterists  because  LeConte  described  many  of  his  western  species  in  those  early 
days;  half  of  his  articles  were  published  before  1865.  A  special  effort  to  correlate 
early  localities  and  boundaries  with  present  boundaries  on  the  basis  of  dates  should  be 
made  in  critical  cases.  Several  books  on  the  territorial  growth  of  the  United  States 
are  available.  Very  detailed  accounts  are  given  in  “Boundaries,  areas,  geographic 
centers  and  altitudes  of  the  United  States  and  the  several  states  with  a  brief  record 
of  important  changes  in  their  territory  and  government,”  by  Edward  M.  Douglass, 
United  States  Geological  Survey  Bulletin  817,  265  pp.,  12  pis.,  26  figs.,  1932. 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


125 


ON  THE  GENUS  ABUTILONEUS  BRIDWELL 
(COLEOPTERA:  BRUCHIDAE) 

By  John  M.  Kingsolver1 

The  genus  Abutiloneus  Bridwell  was  erected  in  1946  for  the  new  species 
idoneus  Bridwell  described  in  the  same  paper.  The  generic  description 
was  indicated  only  by  collective  key  couplets  and  a  very  short  description 
of  the  species.  No  illustrations  were  included. 

Bridwell  was  apparently  uncertain  whether  idoneus  was  the  same  as  a 
species  described  from  Mexico  by  Sharp  (1885)  as  Bruchus  flavicornis. 
Recent  comparison  of  a  male  and  a  female  from  the  type  series  of 
flavicornis  with  the  holotype  of  idoneus  confirmed  that  the  two  species 
are  identical,  thus  idoneus  becomes  a  junior  synonym  of  flavicornis. 

The  purpose  of  this  paper  is  to  give  an  extended  description  of  the 
type-species  with  illustrations  of  diagnostic  characters.  This  should  assist 
future  workers  in  the  identification  of  the  species  and  genus,  and  in  its 
placement  in  the  classification  of  the  Bruchidae. 


Genus  Abutiloneus  Bridwell 
A butiloneus  Bridwell,  1946:55 

Type-species:  Abutiloneus  idoneus  Bridwell,  1946:55  (By  monotypy.) 

=  Buchus  flavicornis  Sharp,  1885:480. 

Since  only  the  one  known  species  is  representative  of  the  genus,  a 
description  of  the  species  will  also  serve  as  a  description  of  the  genus  at 
this  time. 


Abutiloneus  flavicornis  (Sharp),  NEW  COMBINATION 

Bruchus  flavicornis  Sharp,  1885:480;  Schaeffer,  1907:296. 
Acanthoscelides  flavicornis  (Sharp):  Blackwelder,  1946:759. 

Abutiloneus  idoneus  Bridwell,  1946:55.  (NEW  SYNONYMY.) 

Color. — Body  black,  densely  clothed  above  with  glossy,  hairlike,  ochreous  scales, 
below  and  on  pygidium  with  similar  silvery  gray  scales.  Antennae,  labrum,  labial  and 
maxillary  appendages,  and  all  legs  bright  yellow. 

Head  (fig.  1). — Short  and  broad;  interocular  distance  equal  to  width  of  eye;  frons 
densely,  finely  punctate,  sparsely  clothed  with  gray  hairs;  frontal  carina  obsolete  but 
marked  by  an  impunctate  line;  vague  transverse  sulcus  between  upper  limits  of  eyes; 
frontoclypeal  suture  arcuate,  depressed;  clypeolabral  suture  nearly  straight;  labrum 
subtriangular;  eyes  deeply  cleft  by  setose  vertical  sulcus  above  bases  of  antennae; 
postocular  lobe  represented  by  narrow  fringe  of  setae;  antennae  similar  in  the  two 
sexes  (fig.  5). 

Prothorax  (fig.  2). — Disk  campanulate,  sparsely  punctate,  each  puncture  bearing  a 
recumbent  seta,  surface  densely  punctulate  between  punctures;  basal  margin  with 
median  lobe  covering  base  of  scutellum;  prosternum  triangular;  front  coxae  con¬ 
tiguous  apically;  front  legs  not  modified. 


1  Entomology  Research  Division,  Agric.  Res.  Serv.,  U.  S.  Department  of  Agricul¬ 
ture,  Washington,  D.  C. 


126 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


Meso-  and  metathorax. — Elytra  (fig.  2)  short  and  broad,  arcuate  laterally;  striae 
well  marked,  obscurely  punctate,  nearly  evenly  spaced  throughout  length;  first  and 
second  striae  slightly  bent  laterad  at  bases;  striae  2  to  5  each  with  small,  black, 
setiferous  tubercle  at  base;  scutellum  rectangular,  slightly  longer  than  wide;  mes- 
epimeron  reduced  to  small,  triangular,  dorsal  sclerite  by  posterior  margin  of  mesepi- 
sternum;  mesepimeron  and  mesepisternum  finely  punctulate;  posterior  legs  (fig.  10, 
a  &  b)  with  femora  attenuate  basally,  expanded  medially  and  constricted  apically, 
ventral  margin  devoid  of  carinae  or  serrulations,  sometimes  with  minute  denticle  at 
!4  distance  from  apex  (fig.  10b);  tibia  bent  basally,  apex  with  4  to  5  teeth  externally, 
ventral  spur  short,  slender  and  acute,  tarsi  normal. 

Abdomen. — First  ventral  segment  not  modified,  nearly  twice  length  of  remaining 
4  segments  in  male,  1  Vi  times  as  long  in  female;  fifth  ventral  segment  in  male  nearly 
divided  by  apex  of  pygidium,  only  shallowly  emarginate  in  female;  pygidium  (figs. 
3  &  4)  convex  in  both  sexes,  strongly  bent  under  in  male. 

Male  genitalia  (figs.  6,  7,  8,  9). — Parameres  flattened,  usually  crossed  apically, 
apex  with  slender  fleshy  lobe  arising  from  inner  margin  (fig.  9);  ventral  strut  sinuate; 
median  lobe  clavate  in  ventral  view,  deeply  emarginate  at  apex,  lateral  apical 
processes  enclosing  base  of  ogival  ventral  valve;  aedeagal  apodemes  expanded  into 
hoodlike,  thinly  sclerotized  basal  lobe;  internal  sac  armed  with  paired  clusters  of  fine 
spicules  near  apex  of  median  lobe,  a  pair  of  dark  spines  at  middle  and  a  pair  of 
longer  spines  near  base;  median  lobe  in  lateral  view  arcuate,  slightly  expanded  near 
apex;  ventral  valve  falcate  in  lateral  view. 

Female  genitalia  without  discernible  diagnostic  characteristics. 

Length  of  body,  1.5  to  1.8  mm.;  width,  1.0  to  1.2  mm. 

Type  specimens  of  idoneus  in  collection  of  the  U.S.N.M.  Type  specimens  of 
fiavicornis  in  the  British  Museum. 

Discussion 

The  key  characteristics  leading  to  the  genus  and  the  species  description 
of  idoneus  may  be  found  in  Bridwell’s  paper  (1946).  The  type  locality 
of  idoneus  is  Brownsville,  Texas,  and  additional  paratype  localities  are 
San  Diego  and  Corpus  Christi,  Texas,  and  Guerrero,  Coahuila,  and 
Reynosa,  Tamaulipas,  Mexico.  The  type  locality  of  fiavicornis  is  Guana¬ 
juato,  Guanajuato,  Mexico.  The  specimens  Schaeffer  correctly  listed  as 
fiavicornis  from  Brownsville  and  San  Diego,  Texas,  are  probably  the  same 
as  those  designated  by  Bridwell  as  paratypes  of  idoneus  from  the  same 
localities. 

Two  of  the  final  three  key  characters  which  Bridwell  used  to  distinguish 
Abutiloneus,  “elytra  with  striae  5  and  6  abbreviate  at  apex,  hind  femora 
entirely  without  carinae  or  denticles  beneath,”  are  variable.  The  striae 
in  Abutiloneus  are  all  abbreviated  to  some  extent  (fig.  2)  and  are  variable 
in  their  comparative  lengths.  Differences  are  noted  in  this  character  even 
in  the  right  and  left  elytra  of  several  paratype  specimens  of  idoneus. 

While  the  hind  femora  of  Abutiloneus  are  entirely  without  carinae, 
several  specimens  examined  (including  the  specimens  of  fiavicornis) ,  con¬ 
trary  to  the  statement  in  the  key,  do  possess  a  minute  denticle  (fig.  10b) 
visible  with  120X  magnification,  but  others  are  devoid  of  any  armature. 

In  the  7  paratype  males  of  idoneus  dissected,  and  in  the  specimen 
of  fiavicornis  examined,  no  variation  in  the  form  or  placement  of  genital 
armature  was  detected.  Apparently,  in  this  species,  as  in  most  of  the 
Bruchidae,  the  male  genitalia  will  provide  the  most  reliable  characters 
for  identification  at  the  species  level.  Whether  genitalia  will  be  critical 
in  generic  delimitation  remains  to  be  seen.  In  external  appearance, 


1965 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


127 


Figures  1-10,  Abutiloneus  flavicornis  (Sharp).  1 — Head,  cephalic  aspect.  2 — 
Body,  dorsal  aspect.  3 — Pygidium,  male,  lateral  aspect.  4 — Pygidium,  female,  lateral 
aspect.  5 — Left  antenna.  6 — Parameres,  dorsal  aspect.  7 — Median  lobe,  ventral 
aspect.  8 — Median  lobe  and  tegmen,  lateral  aspect.  9 — Right  paramere,  caudal  aspect. 
10 — Posterior  leg;  a,  left  leg,  lateral  aspect;  b,  right  femur,  inner  face. 


128 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  19 


flavicornis  resembles  the  members  of  a  large  complex  of  very  small 
acanthoscelidine  Bruchidae  which  includes  Acanthoscelides  aequalis 
(Sharp),  A.  schrankiae  (Horn),  A.  griseolus  (Fall),  and  many  other 
described  and  undescribed  American  species.  The  armature  of  the  hind 
femora  in  this  group  usually  consists  of  one  short  acute  spine  and  2 
denticles  on  the  inner  ventral  margin.  The  condition  found  in  flavicornis 
probably  represents  a  reduction  of  this  combination.  No  other  species  I 
have  seen  can  be  placed  near  flavicornis  on  the  basis  of  genitalia  or  on 
the  femoral  armature.  For  these  reasons,  I  believe  that  Abutiloneus 
should  retain  generic  status  until  further  studies  can  be  made  at  the 
generic  level. 

I  wish  to  thank  Dr.  R.  T.  Thompson  of  the  British  Museum  staff  for 
arranging  the  loan  of  specimens  of  flavicornis. 

Literature  Cited 

Blackwelder,  R.  E. 

1946.  Checklist  of  the  coleopterous  insects  of  Mexico,  Central  America,  the 
West  Indies  and  South  America.  U.  S.  National  Museum  Bull.  185(4): 
757-763. 

Bridwell,  J.  C. 

1946.  The  genera  of  beetles  of  the  family  Bruchidae  in  America  north  of 
Mexico.  Jour.  Wash.  Acad.  Sci.  36(2) :  52-57. 

Schaeffer,  C. 

1907.  New  Bruchidae,  with  notes  on  known  species  and  list  of  species  known 
to  occur  at  Brownsville,  Texas,  and  in  the  Huachuca  Mountains,  Arizona. 
Brooklyn  Inst.  Arts  Sci.,  Science  Bull.  1  ( 10) : 29 1-306. 

Sharp,  D. 

1885.  Bruchidae.  Biologia  Centrali-Americana,  Insecta,  Coleoptera.  5:437-504. 


Literature  Notice 

NAVAHO  INDIAN  ETHNOENTOMOLOGY.  By  L.  C.  Wyman  and  F.  L. 
Bailey.  Univ.  New  Mexico  Publ.  Anthropology  No.  12,  158  pp.,  illus.  1964. — An 
interesting  account  of  the  importance  and  use  of  insects  in  Navaho  mythology, 
medicine,  and  daily  life.  The  Navaho  system  of  insect  classification  and  nomen¬ 
clature  is  presented  and  explained.  Some  names  are  very  odd;  among  the  beetles 
are  ear  traveler  for  carabid,  rain  beetle  for  cerambycid,  corn  louse  for  coccinellid, 
fire  bug  for  lampyrid,  big  rock  beaver  for  scarabaeid,  fast  running  bug  for  cicindelid, 
soil  blower  for  curculionid,  and  urine  squirter  for  tenebrionid. 


—BACK  ISSUES— 


The  Coleopterists'  Bulletin 


Per 

Single 

Volume 

Issue 

Vol. 

3, 

1949,  6  issues  (Nos.  l  &  2  o.p.) 

$5.00 

$1.00 

Vol. 

4, 

1950,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol. 

5, 

1951,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol. 

6, 

1952,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol. 

7, 

1953,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol. 

8, 

1954,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol. 

9, 

1955,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol. 

10, 

1956,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol. 

11, 

1957,  2  issues 

5.00 

3.00 

Vol. 

12, 

1958,  1  issue 

5.00 

5.00 

Vol. 

13, 

1959,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol. 

14, 

1960,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol. 

15, 

1961,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol. 

16, 

1962,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol. 

17, 

1963,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol. 

18, 

1964,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

(above  prices  Postpaid) 


. ATTENTION  READERS! . 

From  time  to  time  we  receive  requests  from  our  subscribers  who 
wish  to  complete  their  holdings  of  the  Bulletin.  We  would  appre¬ 
ciate  it  if  any  readers  possessing  copies  of  Vol.  3,  No.  1,  with  which 
they  are  willing  to  part,  would  inform  the  Bulletin. 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS1  BULLETIN 

620  Michigan  Avenue,  N.E. 
Washington,  D.  C.  20017 


Japanese  and  Formosan 


Coleoptera 


Price  list  on  request 


J.  Ohkura 


P.O.  Box  No.  2  Shakujii, 
Nerimaku,  Tokyo,  Japan. 


Now  in  its  38th  year — 

Anthropological  Quarterly 

(formerly  Primitive  Man) 

Issued  January,  April,  July  and  October 

(TfO 

Some  Recent  Contents: 

Grasshoppers  as  Food  in  Buhaya . P.  O.  Mors 

A  Pygmy  Group  Newly  Discovered  in  New  Guinea. . Martin  Gusinde 

Eskimo  Reindeer  Herding . Robert  T.  Anderson 

Rock  Paintings  of  South  Africa . Abbe  Henri  Breuil 

The  Assinboin  Horse  Medicine  Cult . John  C.  Ewers 

Treatment  of  Disease  in  the  New  Guinea  Highlands 

Louis  J.  Luzbetak 

( Articles  on  Physical  and  Cultural  Anthropology) 

Subscription  Price  $5.00  a  year  Single  Issues  $1.00 

Anthropological  Quarterly 

620  Michigan  Ave.,  N.E.  Washington,  D.  C.  20017 


The  Coleopterists’  Bulletin 


^  QUARTERLY  PUBLICATION  DEVOTED  TO  THE  STUDY  OF  BEETLES 


VOLUME  20,  1966 


Published  by 


THE  CATHOLIC  UNIVERSITY  OF  AMERICA  PRESS 
WASHINGTON,  D.  C.  20017 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS’  BULLETIN 

Founded  1947  by  Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr. 


The  Coleopterists’  Bulletin  is  published  by  The  Catholic  University  of  America 
Press,  Washington,  D.  C.  20017  and  edited  by  T.  J.  Spilman.  It  is  issued  four  times  a 
year  beginning  with  March.  All  business  matters  should  be  addressed  to  The  Cole¬ 
opterists’  Bulletin  at  the  Press.  Manuscripts  and  other  editorial  matter  should  be 
addressed  to  the  editor,  U.  S.  National  Museum,  Washington,  D.  C.  20560. 


Subscriptions:  The  subscription  price  for 
each  annual  volume  of  four  numbers  is 
$5.00  payable  in  advance.  All  sub¬ 
scriptions  begin  with  the  first  issue  of 
the  year  and  those  subscribing  later  in 
the  year  will  receive  the  back  issues  of 
the  volume. 


Back  volumes:  A  stock  of  back  volumes 
is  maintained  and  may  be  purchased  as 
follows:  3  to  date,  $5.00  ea.;  single  num¬ 
bers,  $1.25  each;  all  prices  postpaid. 
Missing  numbers:  Issues  lost  in  the  mail 
will  be  supplied  free  of  charge  if  notified 
within  three  months  after  mailing. 


EDITORIAL  BOARD 


Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr.,  Ph.D. 

Department  of  Biology 

Catholic  University  of  America 

O.  L.  Cartwright 

U.  S.  National  Museum 

Washington,  D.  C.  20500 

Eugene  J.  Gerberg,  Ph.D. 

Insect  Control  and  Research,  Inc. 

Baltimore,  Md. 

NOTICE  TO 

Manuscripts  will  be  considered  ONLY 
FROM  SUBSCRIBERS.  Authors  should 
consult  STYLE  MANUAL  FOR  BIO¬ 
LOGICAL  JOURNALS,  prepared  by  the 
Committee  on  Form  and  Style  of  the  Con¬ 
ference  of  Biological  Editors,  and  pub¬ 
lished  by  the  American  Institute  of  Bio¬ 
logical  Sciences,  2000  P  St.,  N.W.,  Wash¬ 
ington,  D.  C.  20006.  The  Bulletin  requires 
that  all  manuscripts  be  prepared  according 
to  instructions  in  the  Style  Manual.  Illus¬ 
trations  should  be  sent  mounted,  and 
numbered.  The  manuscript  should  be 
marked  to  indicate  the  location  of  text 
figures  or  the  position  of  full  page  plates. 

Manuscripts  will  be  acknowledged  upon 
receipt.  As  soon  as  possible  thereafter  the 
author  will  be  notified  as  to  acceptance 
after  review  by  the  Editorial  Board.  If 
the  manuscript  is  accepted,  a  tentative 
date  of  publication  will  be  set.  In  general, 


James  A.  Magner,  Ph.D.,  S.T.D. 

Business  Manager  of  the  Bulletin 
Catholic  University  of  America 

Theodore  J.  Spilman 

U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture 
Washington,  D.  C.  20560 

Eileen  R.  Van  Tassell 

Department  of  Biology 
Catholic  University  of  America 

AUTHORS 

all  papers  will  be  published  in  their  order 
of  receipt,  but  the  editor  reserves  the  right 
to  use  articles  out  of  order  in  the  interest 
of  a  balanced  magazine. 

The  editor  will  make  no  text  changes 
without  advanced  notice  to  the  author. 
Galley  proof  will  be  sent  for  correction. 
These  galleys  are  sent  out  well  in  advance 
and  do  NOT  indicate  the  date  or  order  of 
publication. 

Twenty-five  tear  sheets  of  one  page 
notes  will  be  supplied  free  to  the  author  if 
requested  when  returning  galley  proofs. 
Reprints  of  articles  printed  free  of  extrane¬ 
ous  matter  will  be  supplied  with  or  with¬ 
out  covers  at  cost.  Reprints  MUST  be 
ordered  on  the  form  provided  when  re¬ 
turning  galley  proofs.  The  approximate 
cost  of  reprints  will  be  supplied  with  this 
form. 


EDITORIAL  POLICY 

Any  article,  note,  or  news  items  likely  cases,  descriptions  of  new  species  must  be 
to  be  of  interest  to  readers  of  the  Bulletin  illustrated.  Descriptions  of  new  species  or 
will  be  considered.  Articles  with  illustra-  genera  MUST  contain  keys  or  be  corre- 
tions  are  particularly  desired,  and  in  all  lated  with  existing  keys. 


BIOLOGY 


TABLE  OF  CONTENTS 

Volume  20,  1966 

Ball,  G.  E.,  Bembidion  ( Amerizus )  oblongulum  Maimerheim  in  New  Mexico 
(Coleoptera:  Carabidae)  with  notes  on  transcontinental  dispersal  in  Pleisto¬ 
cene  time .  39 

Balsbaugh,  E.  U.,  Jr.,  Taxonomic  notes  on  four  species  of  Lexiphanes  (Cole¬ 
optera:  Chrysomelidae)  from  Middle  America .  117 

Bell,  R.  T.,  Trachypachus  and  the  origin  of  the  Hydradephaga  (Coleoptera)...,..  107 

Bouseman,  J.  K.,  Gnathium  minimum  (Say)  in  Illinois  (Coleoptera:  Maloidae)....  59 

Burke,  H.  R.,  Elytral  interval  polymorphism  in  Anthonomus  grandis  Boheman 

and  Anthonomus  vestitus  Boheman  (Coleoptera:  Curculionidae) .  104 

Dogger,  J.  R.,  and  C.  A.  Olson,  Larval  characteristics  of  some  North  Dakota 

carabids  (Coleoptera:  Carabidae) .  91 

Ford,  E.  J.,  Jr.,  and  J.  M.  Kingsolver,  Description  and  biological  notes  on  the 

larvae  of  Phradonoma  tricolor  (Coleoptera:  Dermestidae) .  27 

Howden,  H.  F.,  Entomological  ramblings  in  Mexico .  19 

Jerath,  M.  L.,  Larvae  of  two  species  of  genus  Heteronychus  from  Nigeria  (Dy- 

nastinae:  Scarabaeidae:  Coleoptera) .  113 

Kissinger,  D.  G.,  Notes  on  Hypera  maritima  (Titus).  (Coleoptera:  Curculionidae)  90 

- - Cyrtobagous  Hustache,  a  genus  of  weevils  new  to  the  United 

States  fauna  (Coleoptera:  Curculionidae:  Bagoini) .  125 

Lawrence,  J.  F.,  and  H.  Reichardt,  The  systematic  position  of  Plaumanniola 

Costa  Lima  (Coleoptera:  Scydmaenidae) .  39 

Leech,  H.  B.,  Were  they  hydrophilids?  (Coleoptera) .  128 

Lloyd,  J.  E.,  Two  cryptic  new  firefly  species  in  the  genus  Photinus  (Coleoptera: 

Lampyridae) .  43 

- Signals  and  mating  behavior  in  several  fireflies  (Coleoptera: 

Lampyridae) .  34 

Moore,  I.,  Notes  on  the  Nearctic  Anthophagini  with  a  key  to  the  genera  (Cole¬ 
optera:  Staphylinidae) .  47 

Reichardt,  H.,  Bostrichidae  (Coleoptera)  7:  A  new  Xylothrips  from  China .  81 

Russell,  L.,  A  new  species  of  Collops  from  Washington  State  (Coleoptera: 

Melyridae) .  8 

Spangler,  P.  J.,  A  new  species  of  Derovatellus  from  Guatemala  and  a  description 

of  its  larva  (Coleoptera:  Dytiscidae) .  11 

- Changes  in  nomenclature  and  reassignment  of  Platydessus 

perforatus  (Coleoptera:  Dytiscidae) .  57 

— - - A  description  of  the  larva  of  Derallus  rudis  Sharp  (Coleoptera: 

Hydrophilidae) .  97 

Spilman,  T.  J.,  A  new  species  of  Martinius  from  Cuba  (Coleoptera:  Limnichidae).. 


123 


Suter,  W.  R.,  Techniques  for  the  collection  of  Microcoleoptera  of  the  families 

Pselaphidae,  Ptiliidae,  and  Scydmaenidae .  33 

W  arner,  R.  E.,  A  review  of  the  Hylobius  of  North  America,  with  a  new  species 

injurious  to  slash  pine  (Coleoptera:  Curculionidae) .  65 

White,  R.  E.,  A  new  genus  and  new  species  of  Anobiidae  from  Jamaica  with  a 

larval  description  (Coleoptera) .  60 


Whitehead,  D.  R.,  Two  remarkable  new  South  American  species  of  Schizogenius 


Putzeys  (Coleoptera:  Carabidae) . . .  1 

Beetle  Talk .  26,  59,  90 

Book  Review .  64 


Literature  Notice .  7,  10,  18,  32,  38, 

42,  103,  106,  122 

Notice .  32,  58,  64,  128 


LIST  OF  NEW  TAX  A  PROPOSED  IN  VOLUME  20,  1966 


Collops  climorphicus  Russell,  n.  sp.  (Melyridae) .  8 

Derovcitellus  ibarrai  Spangler,  n.  sp.  (Dytiscidae) .  11 

Hylobius  aliradicis  Warner,  n.  sp.  (Curculionidae) .  65 

Martmius  ripisaltator  Spilman,  n.  sp.  (Limnichidae) .  124 

Mathrilaeum  Moore,  n.  gen.  (Staphylinidae) .  53 

Parobius  White,  n.  gen.  (Anobiidae) .  60 

Parobius  globulus  White,  n.  sp.  (Anobiidae) .  61 

Photinus  macdermotti  Lloyd,  n.  sp.  (Lampyridae) .  43 

Photinus  tanytoxus  Lloyd,  n.  sp.  (Lampyridae) .  44 

Schizogenius  carinatus  Whitehead,  n.  sp.  (Carabidae) .  2 

Schizogenius  grossus  Whitehead,  n.  sp.  (Carabidae) .  3 

Xylothrips  cathaicus  Reichardt,  n.  sp.  (Bostrichidae) .  82 


DATES  OF  PUBLICATION  OF  VOLUME  20,  1966 

March  (No.  1),  pp.  1-32,  April  26,  1966. 

June  (No.  2),  pp.  33-64,  June  30,  1966. 

September  (No.  3),  pp.  65-96,  October  21,  1966. 

December  (No.  4),  pp.  97-128,  December  22,  1966. 


In  the  future,  the  Bulletin  will  be  published  by  Department  of  Entomology,  Purdue 
University,  Lafayette,  Indiana  47907.  Dr.  Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr.,  will  be  the  Editor. 


VOLUME  20  MARCH  /(No.  1)  1966 

MAY  131963  " - y 

r 

CARABIDAE:  New  Schizogenius,  by  Whitehead .  1 

CARABIDAE:  On  Bembidion  oblongulum,  by  Ball .  30 

COLLECTING:  In  Mexico,  by  Howden .  19 

DERMESTIDAE:  Phradonoma  tricolor  larva, 

by  Ford  and  Kingsolver .  27 

DYTISCIDAE:  On  Derovatellus,  by  Spangler .  11 

MELYRIDAE:  New  Collops,  by  Russell.  .  . .  8 

Bp  "“-i hA;;'/ Qf  Jij. 

- - — — — _ 

■'  L  IS 66 

fay**  -p. 

Beetle  Talk  . v; . . . ><%••••  26 

Literature  Notice . . .  .7,  10,  18,  32 

Notice  .  32 


THE  CATHOLIC  UNIVERSITY  OF  AMERICA  PRESS 
WASHINGTON,  D.C.  20017 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS*  BULLETIN 


Founded  1947  by  Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr. 

The  Coleopterists’  Bulletin  is  published  by  The  Catholic  University  of  America 
Press,  Washington,  D.  C.  20017  and  edited  by  T.  J.  Spilman.  It  is  issued  four  times  a 
year  beginning  with  March.  All  business  matters  should  be  addressed  to  The  Cole- 
opterists’  Bulletin  at  the  Press.  Manuscripts  and  other  editorial  matter  should  be 
addressed  to  the  editor,  U.  S.  National  Museum,  Washington,  D.  C.  20560. 


Subscriptions:  The  subscription  price  for 
each  annual  volume  of  four  numbers  is 
$5.00  payable  in  advance.  All  sub¬ 
scriptions  begin  with  the  first  issue  of 
the  year  and  those  subscribing  later  in 
the  year  will  receive  the  back  issues  of 
the  volume. 


Back  volumes:  A  stock  of  back  volumes 
is  maintained  and  may  be  purchased  as 
follows:  3  to  date,  $5.00  ea.;  single  num¬ 
bers,  $1.25  each;  all  prices  postpaid. 
Missing  numbers:  Issues  lost  in  the  mail 
will  be  supplied  free  of  charge  if  notified 
within  three  months  after  mailing. 


EDITORIAL  BOARD 


Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr.,  Ph.D. 

Department  of  Biology 

Catholic  University  of  America 

O.  L.  Cartwright 

U.  S.  National  Museum 

Washington,  D.  C.  20560 

Eugene  J.  Gerberg,  Ph.D. 

Insect  Control  and  Research,  Inc. 

Baltimore,  Md. 

NOTICE  TO 

Manuscripts  will  be  considered  ONLY 
FROM  SUBSCRIBERS.  Authors  should 
consult  STYLE  MANUAL  FOR  BIO¬ 
LOGICAL  JOURNALS,  prepared  by  the 
Committee  on  Form  and  Style  of  the  Con¬ 
ference  of  Biological  Editors,  and  pub¬ 
lished  by  the  American  Institute  of  Bio¬ 
logical  Sciences,  2000  P  St.,  N.W.,  Wash¬ 
ington,  D.  C.  20006.  The  Bulletin  requires 
that  all  manuscripts  be  prepared  according 
to  instructions  in  the  Style  Manual.  Illus¬ 
trations  should  be  sent  mounted,  and 
numbered.  The  manuscript  should  be 
marked  to  indicate  the  location  of  text 
figures  or  the  position  of  full  page  plates. 

Manuscripts  will  be  acknowledged  upon 
receipt.  As  soon  as  possible  thereafter  the 
author  will  be  notified  as  to  acceptance 
after  review  by  the  Editorial  Board.  If 
the  manuscript  is  accepted,  a  tentative 
date  of  publication  will  be  set.  In  general, 


James  A.  Magner,  Ph.D.,  S.T.D. 

Business  Manager  of  the  Bulletin 
Catholic  University  of  America 

Theodore  J.  Spilman 

U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture 
Washington,  D.  C.  20560 

Eileen  R.  Van  Tassell 

Department  of  Biology 
Catholic  University  of  America 

AUTHORS 

all  papers  will  be  published  in  their  order 
of  receipt,  but  the  editor  reserves  the  right 
to  use  articles  out  of  order  in  the  interest 
of  a  balanced  magazine. 

The  editor  will  make  no  text  changes 
without  advanced  notice  to  the  author. 
Galley  proof  will  be  sent  for  correction. 
These  galleys  are  sent  out  well  in  advance 
and  do  NOT  indicate  the  date  or  order  of 
publication. 

Twenty-five  tear  sheets  of  one  page 
notes  will  be  supplied  free  to  the  author  if 
requested  when  returning  galley  proofs. 
Reprints  of  articles  printed  free  of  extrane¬ 
ous  matter  will  be  supplied  with  or  with¬ 
out  covers  at  cost.  Reprints  MUST  be 
ordered  on  the  form  provided  when  re¬ 
turning  galley  proofs.  The  approximate 
cost  of  reprints  will  be  supplied  with  this 
form. 


EDITORIAL  POLICY 

Any  article,  note,  or  news  items  likely  cases,  descriptions  of  new  species  must  be 
to  be  of  interest  to  readers  of  the  Bulletin  illustrated.  Descriptions  of  new  species  or 
will  be  considered.  Articles  with  illustra-  genera  MUST  contain  keys  or  be  corre- 
tions  are  particularly  desired,  and  in  all  lated  with  existing  keys. 


A  QUARTERLY  PUBLICATION  DEVOTED  TO  THE  STUDY  OF  BEETLES 


The  Coleopterists’  Bulletin 

Volume  20  March  (No.  1)  1966 


TWO  REMARKABLE  NEW  SOUTH  AMERICAN 
SPECIES  OF  SCHIZOGENIUS 
PUTZEYS  (COLEOPTERA:  CARABIDAE). 

By  Donald  R.  Whitehead1 


Neotropical  members  of  the  scaritine  genus  Schizogenius  are  very 
poorly  understood,  and,  indeed,  it  is  impossible  to  recognize  many  of 
the  described  species  from  their  descriptions.  Because  of  inadequate 
material,  to  revise  them  now  would  be  impractical;  and  isolated  descriptions 
of  new  taxa  without  a  firm  basis  for  classification  certainly  would  be 
undesirable.  In  a  proposed  revision  of  North  American  Schizogenius, 
however,  I  plan  to  develop  a  classification  of  the  genus.  Consequently 
I  wish  now  to  provide  names  for  two  very  aberrant  and  highly  distinctive 
new  species  for  future  reference.  These  two  unrelated  South  American 
species  are  unique  in  their  lack  of  discal  setae  on  the  elytra  coupled 
with  possession  of  short  but  conspicuous  paramedian  pronotal  sulci. 

Measurements  were  made  with  an  eyepiece  micrometer  mounted  in 
a  stereoscopic  microscope  at  50  and  150  magnifications,  as  follows.  TL — 
total  length,  represented  as  the  sum  of  the  head  length  from  base  of 
eye  to  antero-lateral  angle  of  clypeus,  plus  pronotal  length  (LP)  along 
midline,  plus  length  of  left  elytron  (LE)  along  suture  from  base  of  sutural 
tubercle  to  apex.  (The  LE  measurement  is  the  most  convenient  indi¬ 
cation  of  size.)  WH — maximum  width  of  head  through  eyes.  WF — 
minimum  width  of  frons  between  eyes.  PS — distance  from  apex  of  para¬ 
median  pronotal  sulcus  to  base  of  pronotum.  WP — maximum  width  of 
pronotum.  WE — maximum  width  across  both  elytra.  Ta — length  of 
hind  tarsus,  excluding  claws.  Ti — length  of  hind  tibia.  The  length  of 
the  aedoeagus  (LA)  is  the  straight  line  distince  from  the  dorsal  margin 
of  the  basal  orifice  to  the  apex. 

The  habitus  drawings  were  made  with  the  aid  of  a  camera  lucida. 
An  ocular  grid  was  used  in  preparation  of  the  other  drawings. 

Material  used  in  this  study  was  provided  through  the  kindness  of  Dr. 
Philip  J.  Darlington,  Jr.  (Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology),  Mr.  Hugh 
B.  Leech  (California  Academy  of  Sciences)  and  Dr.  Paul  J.  Spangler 
(United  States  National  Museum).  I  am  also  grateful  to  Dr.  George 
E.  Ball  of  the  University  of  Alberta  for  reading  and  criticising  the  manu¬ 
script. 


1  Department  of  Entomology,  University  of  Alberta,  Edmonton,  Alberta,  Canada. 


2 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


Schizogenius  carinatus  Whitehead,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  1,3-7) 

The  carinate  intervals  and  lack  of  discal  setae  on  the  elytra  and  the 
well  developed  submarginal  carinae  of  the  pronotum  are  sufficient  to 
distinguish  this  species  from  all  other  known  Schizogenius. 

HOLOTYPE.  “BRAZIL:  Matto  Grosso  side  of  Rio  Araguaia,  Santa 
Isabel”  and  “VIII-10  to  20-57,  Borys  Malkin.”  To  be  deposited  in  the 
California  Academy  of  Sciences. 

DESCRIPTION  OF  HOLOTYPE.  Male  (fig.  1).  Body  cylindrical.  Color  dark 
piceus,  without  metallic  luster;  antennae,  maxillae,  labial  palpi,  legs,  apical  margin 
of  elytra  and  apical  fourth  of  sternum  six  dark  testaceus. 

Integument.  Smooth,  shiny.  Coarse  isodiametric  microsculpture  limited  to  median 
and  paramedian  fields  of  clypeus,  median  field  and  all  paramedian  sulci  of  frons, 
genae,  mentum,  submentum  and  a  pair  of  small  paralateral  patches  on  sternum  two. 
Finer  microsculpture  on  the  anterior  part  of  gula,  a  small  median  patch  on  proster¬ 
num,  front  legs  except  posterior  surfaces  of  femora,  middle  legs,  hind  legs  except 
coxae  and  anterior  surfaces  of  femora,  sternum  one,  most  of  sternum  two  including 
median  field,  sternum  three  in  part  and  sternum  six. 

Head.  Labrum  weakly  biemarginate,  fringed  with  six  pairs  of  lateral  setae.  Clypeus 
strongly  tridentate  apically;  paramedian  carinae  straight,  convergent  on  and  attaining 
median  tooth;  median  field  triangular,  slightly  wider  at  base  than  greatest  width  of 
median  field  of  frons.  Clypeal  suture  deep  and  sharp  behind  median  field  of 
clypeus.  Frons  with  median  field  bisected  by  a  low,  partly  broken,  longitudinal  carina, 
not  limited  in  front  by  a  transverse  carina;  paramedian  sulci  subequal  in  width, 
narrower  than  median  field;  frons  with  five  pairs  of  straight  longitudinal  carinae,  all 
narrow  at  base,  the  first  (paramedian)  and  fourth  broader  and  more  strongly  elevated, 
the  fifth  short  but  well  developed.  Eyes  large  (WF/WH,  0.60),  globose,  coarsely 
faceted,  the  facets  all  subequal  in  size.  Neck  densely  and  coarsely  punctate.  Genae 
strongly  rugose.  Gula  at  narrowest  point  approximately  0.23  width  of  mentum. 
Submentum  lacking  numerous,  scattered  setae.  Mentum  deeply  incised  at  middle  and 
with  antero-lateral  angles  of  epilobes  acutely  produced;  median  tooth  small,  slender, 
sharp.  Labial  palpi  with  penultimate  article  bisetose.  Antennae  (fig.  3)  with  articles 
four  to  ten  moderately  elongate;  scape  with  a  single  subapical  dorsal  seta,  ecarinate, 
lacking  a  dorsal  tubercle;  pedicel  with  a  single  subapical  ventral  seta;  articles  three 
to  eleven  pubescent. 

Pronotum.  Very  convex,  transverse  (LP/WP,  0.87),  greatest  width  near  middle. 
Sides  broadly  rounded  into  base,  hind  angles  completely  obsolete;  sides  with  only 
the  two  standard  pairs  of  setae.  Submarginal  carinae  strongly  developed,  parallel  to 
sides,  extending  from  apex  of  pronotum  to  level  of  posterior  setae.  Basal  carina 
strongly  elevated  above  and  distant  from  margin,  basal  transverse  impression  sharply 
discontinuous  with  marginal  grooves.  Paramedian  sulci  short  (PS/LP,  0.46),  shallow 
apically,  deep  and  broadly  hooked  basally  where  terminated  abruptly  by  forward 
extensions  of  basal  carina;  paralateral  sulci  absent.  Anterior  transverse  impression 
punctate. 

Legs.  Front  tarsi  strongly  dilated  and  with  dense  ventral  pubescence;  middle  tarsi 
moderately  dilated;  hind  tarsi  slender,  short  (Ta/Ti,  0.68).  Paronychia  conspicuous, 
about  half  as  long  as  tarsal  claws.  Front  tibiae  (fig.  4)  with  four  evident  external 
teeth,  distal  tooth  nearly  straight,  penultimate  tooth  slender  and  elongate  (seta 
subapical);  apical  and  subapical  spurs  straight  and  slender,  subequal  in  length, 
both  shorter  than  penultimate  tooth;  front  tibiae  narrowed  evenly  to  base,  where 
much  narrower  than  at  level  of  subapical  spur;  posterior  ventral  margin  with  three 
setae  proximad  to  subapical  spur.  Middle  and  hind  tibiae  with  apical  spurs  very 
slender,  very  little  thicker  than  other  setae. 

Elytra.  Discal  setigerous  punctures  absent,  except  one  near  base  of  interval  three. 
Striae  deep  and  sharply  engraved  throughout,  finely  punctate  in  basal  2/3.  Intervals 
three  to  eight  conspicuously  carinate,  the  second  less  so;  intervals  two  to  eight  all 
free  at  apex,  interval  one  attaining  margin  of  elytron.  Lateral  channel  lacking  con¬ 
spicuous  subapical  pits. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


3 


Hind  wings.  Macropterous,  wings  probably  functional. 

Abdomen.  Sternum  two  with  median  field  delimited  by  a  pair  of  straight,  diverging 
paramedian  carinae.  Sterna  three,  four  and  five  each  with  a  single  pair  of  paramedian 
ambulatory  setae.  Sternum  six  with  a  pair  of  paramedian  ambulatory  setae  and  two 
pairs  ot  equidistant  marginal  setae.  Pygidium  with  apical  margin  entire. 

Male  genitalia.  See  figs.  5-7.  Median  lobe  markedly  asymmetric  (fig.  5),  apex 
of  the  shaft  forming  a  flange  at  approximately  45  degrees  to  left  of  center;  in  lateral 
view  (fig.  6)  median  lobe  appears  arcuate,  apical  third  not  abruptly  bent  downward. 
Internal  sac  (fig.  7)  with  apical  brush  large  and  complex,  with  distinct  but  short 
and  slender  basal  collar  spines,  and  with  a  well  developed  and  possibly  articulated, 
weakly  sclerotized  dorsal  cap  sclerite  (which  in  repose  forms  a  cap  over  the  brush). 

Measurements.  TL,  3.85  mm.  LE,  2.38  mm.  WH,  0.81  mm.  WP,  1.12  mm.  WE, 
1.32  mm.  LA,  0.73  mm. 

V  ARIA!  ION.  Unknown.  Female  will  probably  be  found  to  lack  paramedian 
ambulatory  setae  of  sternum  six,  front  tarsi  should  be  more  slender  and  less  densely 
pubescent,  and  margin  of  pygidium  may  be  either  crenulate  or  entire. 

DISTRIBUTION .  S.  carinatus  is  known  only  from  the  holotype,  from 
central  Brazil. 

REMARKS.  Some  characteristics  of  S.  carinatus  which  are  absent  or 
infrequent  elsewhere  in  the  genus  are  as  follows.  1.  The  median  longi¬ 
tudinal  carina  and  coarse  microsculpture  of  the  median  field  of  the 
frons  (found  also  in  certain  species  of  the  riparius-darlingtoni  complex). 

2.  The  strongly  raised  submarginal  carinae  of  the  pronotum  (these  carinae 
are  also  well  developed  in  S.  strigicollis  Putzeys,  less  so  in  a  few  others). 

3.  The  complete  loss  of  hind  angles  of  the  pronotum.  4.  The  carinate 
elytral  intervals  (said  to  pertain  also  to  S.  impressicollis  Putzeys,  a  species 
1  haven't  seen),  all  of  which  terminate  independently  at  the  apex.  5.  The 
lack  of  discal  setae  on  the  elytra  (this  condition  occurs  also  in  some 
members  ol  the  optimus-clivinosides-dyschirioides  complex,  and  in  S. 
gross  us,  n.  sp.) . 

I  am  unable  to  deduce  any  reasonable  interpretation  of  relationships 
from  these  data.  I  suspect  that  all  of  these  characteristics  are  specializa¬ 
tions  which  have  probably  evolved,  independently,  more  than  once. 
Clearly,  however,  S.  carinatus  belongs  in  a  group  by  itself. 


Schizogenius  grosses  Whitehead,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  2,  8-13) 

The  very  large  size  and  maculate  elytra,  the  shallow  striae  and  lack 
of  discal  setae  on  the  elytra,  the  presence  of  ten  or  more  pairs  of  laterally 
frmging  setae  on  the  labrum,  and  the  reduced  pubescence  of  antennal 
articles  three  and  four  will  all  serve  to  separate  this  species  from  other 
known  Schizogenius. 

HOLOTYPE.  “Rio  Madeira,  Brazil.  Mann  &  Baker”  and  “BROOK¬ 
LYN  MUSEUM  COLL  1929.”  To  be  deposited  in  the  United  States 
National  Museum,  USNM  68012. 

DESCRIPTION  OF  HOLOTYPE.  Male  (fig.  2).  Body  very  stout,  subcylindrical. 
Color  dark  castaneus,  without  metallic  luster;  legs  paler;  antennae,  maxillae,  labial 
pa’pi  and  elytra  (except  for  a  large,  dark  castaneus  medio-sutural  maculation)  dark 
testaceus. 


4 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


Integument.  Smooth,  slightly  dulled  by  very  weak,  imperfectly  isodiametric  micro- 
sculpture.  Genae,  elytra  and  abdomen  with  distinct  isodiametric  microsculpture,  their 
surfaces  strongly  dulled.  Coarse  microsculpture  absent  from  paramedian  frontal  sulci, 
and  absent  from  small  paralateral  patches  on  sternum  two. 

Head.  Labrum  weakly  biemarginate,  fringed  with  ten  pairs  of  lateral  setae.  Clypeus 
with  lateral  apical  teeth  strong  and  blunt,  median  tooth  subobsolete,  margin  thus 
bisinuate;  paramedian  carinae  nearly  straight,  convergent  toward  median  tooth,  ob¬ 
solete  in  apical  half;  median  field  triangular,  width  at  base  more  than  1.5  greatest 
width  of  median  field  of  frons.  Clypeal  suture  obsolete.  Frons  with  median  field 
smooth,  lacking  median  carina,  closed  in  front  by  a  transverse  carina;  paramedian 
sulci  decreasing  in  width  outward  from  median  field,  the  broadest  only  slightly  nar¬ 
rower  than  median  field;  frons  with  four  pairs  of  well-developed  longitudinal 
carinae  between  eyes,  fourth  (outer)  broader  and  more  strongly  elevated,  fifth  nearly 
obsolete,  second  and  third  bowed  outwards  at  middle,  all  narrow  and  somewhat 
abbreviated  at  base.  Eyes  small  (WF/WH,  0.75),  subglobose,  facets  all  small  and 
equal  in  size.  Neck  finely  and  sparsely  punctate  at  middle,  obliquely  rugose,  and  rugae 
convergent  basally.  Genae  finely  rugose  in  front,  smooth  behind.  Gula  at  narrowest 
point  approximately  0.09  width  of  mentum.  Submentum  lacking  numerous,  scattered 
setae.  Mentum  shallowly  incised  at  middle  and  with  anterolateral  angles  of  epilobes 
acutely  produced;  median  tooth  short,  blunt,  broad.  Labial  palpi  with  penultimate 
article  bisetose.  Antennae  (fig.  8)  with  articles  four  to  ten  moniliform,  slightly 
transverse;  scape  with  a  single  subapical  dorsal  seta,  carinate  dorsally  beyond  seta, 
lacking  a  dorsal  tubercle;  pedicel  short,  with  a  single  submedian  ventral  seta;  articles 
three  and  four  plurisetose  (not  pubescent),  most  of  setae  short  and  fringing  around 
apex;  articles  five  to  eleven  pubescent. 

Pronotum.  Very  convex  and  transverse  (LP/WP,  0.74),  greatest  width  near  middle. 
Hind  angles  short  but  sharp,  interrupting  lateral  grooves;  side  margins  broad,  sharply 
emarginate  at  anterior  seta,  lobate  in  front;  sides  with  only  the  two  standard  pairs 
of  setae.  Submarginal  carinae  absent.  Basal  carina  moderately  elevated  above  margin, 
basal  transverse  impression  not  continuous  with  posterior  marginal  grooves.  Para¬ 
median  sulci  rather  short  (PS/LP,  0.62),  shallow  apically,  deep  and  broadly  hooked 
basally  where  terminated  abruptly  by  forward  extensions  of  basal  carina;  paralateral 
sulci  absent.  Anterior  transverse  impression  shallow  and  impunctate,  but  somewhat 
irregular  due  to  slight  rugosity  of  pronotal  disc. 

Legs.  Front  and  middle  tarsi  slender,  lacking  dense  ventral  pubescence;  hind  tarsi 
slender,  very  elongate  (Ta/Ti,  1.10).  Paronychia  very  short  and  inconspicuous, 
subequal  in  length  to  basal  width  of  tarsal  claws.  Front  tibiae  (fig.  9)  with  three 
evident  external  teeth,  distal  tooth  broadly  curved,  penultimate  tooth  short  and  stout 
(seta  subbasal);  apical  and  subapical  spurs  straight  and  slender,  both  longer  than 
penultimate  tooth,  subapical  spur  much  longer  and  subequal  in  length  to  distal  tooth; 
front  tibiae  narrowed  evenly  to  base,  where  much  narrower  than  at  level  of  subapical 
spur;  posterior  ventral  margin  with  four  setae  proximad  to  subapical  spur.  Middle  and 
hind  tibiae  with  apical  spurs  much  thicker  than  and  distinct  from  other  setae. 

Elytra.  Discal  setigerous  punctures  lacking,  except  one  near  base  of  interval  three. 
Striae  shallowly  engraved  (especially  toward  apex),  finely  punctate  in  basal  2/3. 
Intervals  two  to  seven  moderately  convex,  eighth  narrow  but  carinate  only  toward 
apex;  intervals  three  and  five  broadly  joined  with  interval  seven  at  apex,  interval  one 
attaining  margin  of  elytron.  Lateral  channel  lacking  conspicuous  subapical  pits. 

Hind  wings.  Sternum  two  with  median  field  limited  by  a  pair  of  straight,  diverging 
paramedian  carinae.  Sterna  three,  four  and  five  each  with  a  single  pair  of  paramedian 
ambulatory  setae.  Pygidium  with  apical  margin  entire. 

Male  genitalia.  See  figs.  10-13.  Median  lobe  nearly  symmetric  (fig.  10);  apical  por¬ 
tion  of  shaft  compressed  and  abruptly  bent  downward  (fig.  12),  with  paired  carinate 
margins  ventro-laterally  (figs.  10-11).  Internal  sac  (fig.  13)  with  apical  brush  marked¬ 
ly  reduced,  lacking  collar  spines  or  any  other  evidently  enlarged  sclerites  or  enlarged 
spine-like  structures,  and  also  apparently  lacking  dorsal  cap  sclerite.  (I  am  not  per¬ 
fectly  certain,  however,  that  the  internal  sac  was  properly  everted;  because  of  very  con¬ 
siderable  reduction  in  visibly  sclerotized  structures,  no  satisfactory  reference  point 
was  found.) 

Measurements.  TL,  7.02  mm.  LE,  4.32  mm.  WH,  1.80  mm.  WP,  2.48  mm.  WE, 
2.55  mm.  LA,  1.32  mm. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


5 


ALLO'l  YPE.  “Bolivia  Prov.  Sara  Steinbach”  (handwritten)  and 
“Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology.”  Te  be  deposited  in  the  Museum  of 
Comparative  Zoology. 

DESCRIPTION  OF  ALLOTYPE.  Female.  Specimen  lacks  outer  three  articles  of 
left  antenna  and  outer  article  of  right  antenna,  shows  wear  or  loss  of  tarsal  claws, 
and  is  somewhat  darkened  (due  probably  to  immersion  in  some  fluid).  Secondary 
sexual  characters  lacking  in  S.  grossus,  so  allotype  differs  appreciably  from  the  holo- 
type  only  in  mensural  characters.  Eyes  slightly  larger  (WF/WH,  0.72),  pronotum 
slightly  less  transverse  (LP/WP,  0.75),  paramedian  pronotal  sulci  proportionately 
shorter  (PS/LP,  0.60),  and  hind  tarsi  slightly  shorter  (Ta/Ti,  1.07). 

Measurements.  TL,  6.66  mm.  LE,  4.18  mm.  WH,  1.62  mm.  WP,  2.26  mm.  WE, 
2.52  mm. 


PARATYPES.  BOLIVIA:  Comatindi  (one  female);  Tiguipa  (one 
female).  BRAZIL:  Rio  Madeira  (one  male).  All  of  these  will  be  de¬ 
posited  in  the  United  States  National  Museum. 

VARIATION.  The  chief  observed  variations  are  in  size  (LE,  3.90-4.90,  mean 
4.44  mm.)  and,  to  a  lesser  degree,  in  proportions  (WF/WH,  0.69-0.75,  mean  0.72; 
LP/WP,  0.73-0.75,  mean  0.74;  PS/LP,  0.60-0.68,  mean  0.63;  Ta/Ti,  1.07-1.12, 
mean  1.09).  Some  other  variations  worthy  of  record  are:  male  genitalia  (see  figs.  10- 
11);  size  of  sutural  macula  (extends  to  interval  three  in  male  paratype,  to  interval 
four  in  other  specimens);  fringing  setae  of  labrum  (thirteen  pairs  in  the  Comatindi 
specimen);  and  rugosity  of  pronotum  (quite  rugose  in  allotype  and  male  paratype). 
Certain  secondary  sexual  characters  which  frequently  are  present  in  other  species  are 
not  found  in  S.  grossus;  thus,  male  front  tarsi  unmodified,  female  pygidium  entire 
and  both  sexes  lack  paramedian  ambulatory  setae  on  sternum  six. 


DISTRIBUTION .  S.  grossus  is  represented  by  the  five  specimens  listed 
as  type  material.  All  are  from  the  Amazon  Basin  of  Bolivia  and  Brazil. 

REMARKS.  Several  characteristics  of  S.  grossus  are  unknown  in  other 
Schizogenius,  as  follows.  1.  The  narrow  gula.  2.  The  sparsely  setose 
third  and  fourth  antennal  articles.  3.  The  shallow  emargination  of  the 
mentum.  4.  The  unusually  large  number  of  fringing  setae  of  the  labrum. 

5.  The  additional  (fourth)  basal,  postero-ventral  seta  of  the  front  tibiae. 

6.  The  shallow  elytral  striae.  7.  The  remarkably  elongate  tarsi.  8.  The 
reduced  apical  brush  of  the  male  genitalia. 

Some  affinity  with  the  optimus-clivinoides-dyschirioides  complex  may 
be  suggested  by  a  general  similarity  in  most  other  respects,  including 
the  absence  of  secondary  sex  characters.  However,  species  of  that  group 
lack  well  developed  paramedian  pronotal  sulci,  and  they  have  a  sharply 
and  deeply  emarginate  labrum.  As  in  the  case  of  S.  carinatus,  this  species 
is  not  closely  allied  with  any  others  and  belongs  in  a  group  of  its  own. 

S.  grossus  is  the  largest  known  Schizogenius  (hence  its  name).  Of  the 
next  largest  species,  the  relatively  slender  S.  quadripunctatus  Putzeys 
from  Brazil,  only  the  largest  examples  (maximum  LE,  3.93  mm.)  are 
within  the  size  range  of  grossus.  One  very  large  Guatemalan  specimen 
of  the  heavy-bodied  S.  optimus  Bates  (LE,  3.76  mm.)  is  nearly  as  large 
as  the  smallest  S.  grossus,  so  perhaps  they  too  overlap. 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


Key  to  Major  Elements  of  Schizogenius 

Lateral  channel  of  elytra  with  one  or  more  deep  subapical  pits - 

- CRENULATUS-TENUIS-QUINQUESULCATUS  COMPLEX 

Lateral  channel  of  elytra  without  deep  subapical  pits -  2 

Pronotum  lacking  paramedian  longitudinal  sulci - 

- OPTIMUS-CLIVINOIDES-DYSCHIRIOIDES  COMPLEX 

Pronotum  with  deep  paramedian  longitudinal  sulci -  3 

Articles  three  and  four  of  antennae  plurisetose - GROSSUS  Whitehead 

Articles  three  and  four  of  antennae  pubescent -  4 

Elytral  intervals  lacking  setigerous  punctures - CARINATUS  Whitehead 

Elytral  intervals  three,  five  and  usually  seven  each  with  a  row  of  setigerous  punctures 
(only  on  interval  three  in  quadripunctatus)  -  REMAINING  SPECIES  OF  SCHIZOGENIUS 


Figure  1,  Schizogenius  carinatus.  Body,  dorsal  view. 
Figure  2,  Schizogenius  grossus.  Body,  dorsal  view. 


Figures  3-7,  Schizogenius  carinatus.  3 — Antenna,  basal  articles.  4 — Front  tibia, 
posterior  view.  5 — Aedoeagus,  ventral  view.  6 — Aedoeagus,  lateral  view,  7 — Internal 
I  sac  (bs — basal  collar  spines;  ds — dorsal  cap  sclerite). 

Figures  8-13,  Schizogenius  grossus.  8 — Antenna,  basal  articles.  9 — Front  tibia, 
posterior  view.  10 — Aedoeagus,  ventral  view  (holotype).  1 1-Apex  of  same  (paratype). 
12 — Aedoeagus,  lateral  view.  13 — Internal  sac. 

(The  line  scales  represent  0.10  mm.) 


LITERATURE  NOTICE 

EXTERNAL  CHARACTERS  OF  SIBLING  SPECIES  TRECHUS  OBTUSUS 
|TR.  AND  T.  QUADRISTRIATUS  SCHRK.  (COLEOPTERA).  By  P.  J.  den  Boer. 
Iijdschr.  Ent.  108(9)  :2 19-239,  i  1 1  us.  1965. — Morphological  structures  are  analyzed 
■tatistically  in  these  two  European  species.  It  seems  to  be  quite  thorough. 


8 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


A  NEW  SPECIES  OF  COLLOPS  FROM  WASHINGTON  STATE 

(COLEOPTERA:  MELYRIDAE) 

By  Loren  Russell1 


Collops  dimorpbicus  Russell,  NEW  SPECIES 

MALE:  Elongate-oblong,  depressed  for  the  genus,  widest  at  apical  third  of 
elytra.  Head,  pronotum  and  femora  black;  tibiae  and  tarsi  rufous  to  black;  labrum, 
apical  half  of  clypeus,  maxillae  and  mandibles  testaceous  to  rufous;  tips  of 
mandibles  darker,  palpi  black;  antennae  piceous  with  true  second  segment  and 
posterior  surfaces  of  first  and  third  segments  testaceous.  Elytra  shining  violaceous 
to  greenish  black,  with  testaceous  maculation  at  lateral  and  apical  margins  as 
figured,  this  maculation  in  one  specimen  extending  narrowly  along  suture  to  mid- 
elytral  level.  Lower  surface  of  body  piceous,  paler  in  membranous  areas,  shining. 
Entire  body  surface  alutaceous,  most  densely  so  on  pronotum. 

Head  with  front  flattened,  densely  and  confluently  punctured.  Antennae  11-seg- 
mented,  long,  exceeding  pronotum  by  four  to  five  segments  with  head  partly 
deflexed,  strongly  serrate;  first  segment  expanded  apically;  second  segment  much 
reduced,  obscured  by  first  segment  in  direct  dorsal  view;  third  segment  flattened, 
irregularly  triangular  in  outline,  anterior  margin  arcuately  expanded,  not  excavated 
or  deformed  as  in  most  Collops  males. 

Pronotum  transverse,  about  1.6  times  as  wide  as  long,  widest  behind  middle, 
transversely  convex,  all  angles  broadly  rounded.  Faint  callosities  evident  near 
hind  angles  in  some  specimens.  Pubescence  of  head  and  pronotum  similar,  of 
sparse,  dark,  erect  setae  intermixed  with  abundant,  fine,  light,  forwardly  decumbent 
hairs. 

Elytral  apices  divergent,  subrectangular,  surface  somewhat  scabrous,  with  sparse 
erect  setae  intermixed  with  more  abundant  fine  semierect  hairs.  Hind  wings  of 
normal  length.  One  or  two  abdominal  tergites  exposed  by  elytra,  terminal  segment 
triangular,  its  apex  truncate  and  sometimes  minutely  emarginate.  Protarsi  four- 
segmented,  other  tarsi  five-segmented;  claws  with  membranous  appendages. 

FEMALE:  Similar  to  male  except  in  following  characters.  Body  larger,  abdomen 
considerably  expanded  laterally;  elytra  narrower,  narrowed  slightly  apically  from 
basal  fourth,  apices  separately  arcuately  rounded,  abbreviated  to  expose  three  or 
four  apical  tergites  and  lateral  portions  of  additional  segments;  lateral  abdominal 
vesicles  very  prominent.  Wings  vary  from  almost  as  long  as  elytra  to  nearly 
absent.  Antennae  slightly  serrate,  shorter,  second  segment  obvious  in  dorsal  view; 
third  segment  slightly  enlarged,  similar  in  shape  to  fourth  segment.  First  three 
antennal  segments  testaceous  except  anterior  apical  quadrant  of  first  segment 
and  apical  half  of  third  segment.  Eyes  relatively  much  smaller  and  less  convex, 
front  somewhat  more  transverse.  All  tarsi  five-segmented. 

LENGTH:  male,  3. 0-3. 3  mm.;  female,  3. 6-4. 5  mm. 

Holotype  male,  allotype  female  and  three  male  and  twelve  female 
paratypes,  all  “Grand  Coulee,  Wash.  /  Dry  Falls  /  V-8-1965  /  on  Eriogo- 
num  L.  Russell.”  The  type  series  was  picked  from  the  flowers  of  these  very 
low  plants,  all  within  a  thirty  yard  radius.  None  were  present  in  sweepings 
taken  in  the  same  area.  The  holotype  and  allotype  are  in  the  author’s 
collection;  paratypes  are  there  and  in  the  University  of  Washington  col¬ 
lection. 


1  Thomas  Burke  Memorial  Museum  and  Department  of  Zoology,  University  of 
Washington,  Seattle,  Washington. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


9 


Among  North  American  Collops  only  the  central  Californian  C.  simplex 
Marshall  resembles  the  present  species  in  the  undistorted  triangular  third 
antennal  segment  of  the  male  and  in  the  marked  sexual  dimorphism  in 
head  shape  and  eye  size.  The  simplex  male  type  lacks  elytra!  maculation, 
and  its  presumptive  female  possesses  normal  elytra.  The  abbreviated, 
apically  narrowed  elytra  of  female  dimorphicus  seem  unique  in  Collops. 
Among  North  American  species  C.  cribrosus  LeC.  and  C.  crusoe  Fall 
are  flightless  in  both  sexes,  but  these  possess  full  length  elytra  with  narrow 
humeri,  as  well  as  the  usual  modifications  of  the  male  antennae.  If 
simplex  and  dimorphicus  are  accepted  as  species  of  Collops,  that  genus 
should  be  defined  by  the  reduced  second  antennal  segment,  rather  than 
by  the  usual  statement,  “antennae  apparently  10-segmented,  third  segment 
distorted  in  male.” 

The  following  key  separates  dimorphicus  and  simplex  from  the  species 
included  in  Fall’s  key  to  North  American  Collops  (1912:251). 

1.  True  third  antennal  segment  of  male  very  large,  excavated  dorsal ly  and  appendiculate; 

pronotum  usually  smooth  and  shining;  elytra  of  normal  length - Groups  A,  B,  C  of  Fall 

Third  antennal  segment  of  male  triangular,  enlarged  but  not  excavated  or  appenicu- 

late;  pronotum  alutaceous -  2 

Female  elytra  short,  widest  near  humeri;  elytra  maculate  and  pronotum  immaculate 

in  both  sexes - DIMORPHICUS  n.  sp. 

Elytra  normally  long,  exposing  only  pygidium;  elytra  and  pronotum  maculate  in 
female  allotype,  male  type  immaculate - SIMPLEX  Marshall 


Figures  1,  2.  Collops  dimorphicus  n.  sp.  1 — male.  2 — female. 


10 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


Literature  Cited 

Fall,  H.  C. 

1912.  A  review  of  the  North  American  species  of  Collops.  Jour.  New  York 
Ent.  Soc.  20:249-274. 

Marshall,  M.  Y. 

1951.  Studies  in  the  Malachiidae  III.  Proc.  Calif.  Acad.  Sci.  27(4)77-132. 
1954.  Studies  in  the  Malachiidae  V.  Bull.  Brooklyn  Ent.  Soc.  49:66-80. 


1 VVP 


LITERATURE  NOTICE 

NORTH  DAKOTA  WATER  BEETLES.  By  R.  D.  Gordon  and  R.  L.  Post. 
North  Dakota  Insects,  Publ.  No.  5,  53  pp.,  illus.  1965. — This  is  a  manual  with 
keys,  descriptions,  and  distributions  for  135  species  in  10  families. 

NOTAS  SOBRE  ANOBIDOS  (COLEOPTERA).  By  F.  Espanol.  Eos  41  (1): 
45-58,  22  figs.  1965. — Concerning  Ptilinus,  its  characteristics,  relationships,  place¬ 
ment,  relatives,  and  reassignment  of  some  of  its  species  into  old  and  new  genera. 

STAPH YLININI  UND  QUEDIINI  VON  CANADA  UND  ALASKA  (COL. 
STAPHYLINIDAE).  By  A.  Smetana.  Acta  Universitatis  lundensis,  Sectio  II, 
Medica,  Mathematica,  Scientiae  rerum  naturalium,  No.  13,  18  pp.,  9  figs.  1965. — 
A  report  on  specimens  collected  by  Lindroth,  mostly  locality  records  and  general 
notes  on  distributions,  with  a  new  subspecies.  (This  recently  new  magazine  is  a 
continuation  of  Lunds  Universitets  Arsskrift,  N.  F.  Avd.  2.) 

A  TAXONOMIC  STUDY  OF  LOUISIANA  CARABIDAE  (INSECTA:  COLE¬ 
OPTERA).  By  R.  T.  Allen.  Proc.  Louisiana  Acad.  Sci.  28:56-85,  29  figs.  1965. — 
Contains  keys  to  all  species  and  parish  records  of  capture.  Some  parts  and  whole 
beetles  are  illustrated. 

A  KEY  TO  NORTH  AMERICAN  STATIRA  (COLEOPTERA:  LAGRIIDAE). 
By  C.  T.  Parsons.  Psyche  72(3 )  :241-254,  12  figs.  1965. — Sixteen  species  are  in¬ 
cluded  with  the  key  and  locality  records.  A  new  species,  from  Florida,  is  described. 

VERGLEICHEND-MORPHOLOGISCHE  UNTERSUCHUNGEN  DER  AEDE- 
AGI  DER  MITTELEUROPAISCHEN  MELIGETHINI  (COL.,  NITIDULIDAE) . 
By  F.  Blazejewski.  Polskie  Pismo  Ent.  35(2)  :267-390,  83  figs.  1965. — Parameres  and 
penes  of  62  species  are  described  in  detail.  The  evolution  of  various  aedegal  types 
in  the  Meligethini  are  discussed. 

REVISION  OF  DIAPERINI  OF  AMERICA  NORTH  OF  MEXICO  WITH 
NOTES  ON  EXTRALIMITAL  SPECIES  (COLEOPTERA:  TENEBRIONIDAE). 
By  C.  A.  Triplehorn.  Proc.  U.  S.  Nat.  Mus.  1 17(3515)  :349-458,  illus.  1965.— This 
revision  will  be  welcomed  by  anyone  having  trouble  identifying  members  of  the 
tribe;  the  excellent  keys,  descriptions,  and  illustrations  are  the  reason.  Though 
the  work  stresses  species  of  the  United  States,  it  shows  many  of  the  relationships 
of  those  species  with  the  Latin  American  species.  34  species  in  9  genera  are  in¬ 
cluded,  with  one  species  and  genus  being  given  incertis  sedae  status.  Triplehorn 
has  done  a  good  job. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


11 


A  NEW  SPECIES  OF  DEROVATELLUS  FROM  GUATEMALA 
AND  A  DESCRIPTION  OF  ITS  LARVA 
(COLEOPTERA:  DYTISCIDAE) 

By  Paul  J.  Spangler1-  2 


The  genus  Derovatellus  in  the  Western  Hemisphere  presently  includes 
D.  lentus  (Wehncke),  D.  lentus  floridanus  Fall  and  D.  bruchi  Zimmerman. 
These  species  are  similar  in  shape  and  color.  D.  lentus  was  described 
from  Puerto  Rico  by  Wehncke  (1876)  and  has  been  reported  from  the 
following  localities:  Santa  Rita  and  Santa  Cruz  [Brazil]  by  Sharp  (1882); 
Dominican  Republic,  Haiti,  Trinidad  and  Colombia  by  Young  (1954). 
The  subspecies  D.  lentus  floridanus  is  known  only  from  Florida,  and  D. 
bruchi  is  reported  only  from  the  type  locality  in  Argentina. 

During  the  summer  of  1965  I  collected  a  series  of  an  interesting 
Derovatellus  from  Guatemala.  The  specimens  were  very  similar  to  those 
of  D.  lentus  that  I  collected  in  Puerto  Rico  but  the  elytral  maculae  seemed 
more  distinct.  The  Guatemalan  specimens  were  also  interesting  even  if 
they  were  D.  lentus  and  not  a  new  species  because  they  represented  the 
first  record  of  the  genus  from  Central  America.  When  1  compared  the 
Guatemalan  specimens  with  those  from  Puerto  Rico,  I  found  that  the 
Guatemalan  series  did  indeed  represent  a  new  species.  The  species  is 
described  below  and  is  dedicated  to  my  friend  Dr.  Jorge  Ibarra,  Founder 
and  Director  of  the  National  Museum  of  Natural  History  of  Guatemala. 
Dr.  Ibarra  kindly  helped  me  in  many  ways  during  my  field  activities  in 
Guatemala  and  made  my  collecting  there  much  more  fruitful. 

This  new  species  is  very  similar  to  D.  lentus  (figs.  7-12)  but  may 
be  distinguished  from  it  by  the  alutaceous  sculpture  of  head  restricted 
to  the  area  behind  the  posterior  margin  of  the  eyes,  by  the  moderately 
coarse  and  sparse  pronotal  punctures,  by  the  very  fine,  almost  indistinguish¬ 
able  elytral  punctures  and  by  differences  in  the  male  genitalia  (figs.  4,  5,  6). 


Derovatellus  ibarri  Spangler,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  1-6) 

Length  of  holotype  male,  4.0  mm.,  greatest  width  1.8  mm.  Color  of  head 
testaceous;  pronotum  testaceous  except  small  fuscous  basal  area;  elytra  black 
except  for  three  transversely  arranged,  testaceous,  postmedian  maculae  and  another 
macula  laterad  along  apical  margin  on  each  elytron;  venter  dark  reddish  brown 
except  last  abdominal  segment  lighter  brown;  antennae,  mouthparts  and  legs 
testaceous.  Head  finely,  sparsely  punctate  and  faintly  alutaceous  between  eyes  and 
pronotum;  punctures  very  fine  and  sparse  on  clypeus;  clypeus  curved  downward 
and  backward  and  arcuately  emarginate;  labrum  finely  sparsely  punctate,  deeply 
emarginate  medially  and  dense  fringe  of  golden  setae  in  emargination.  Antenna 
1 1-segmented;  basal  and  ultimate  segments  largest,  subequal;  second  segment  slightly 


1  Department  of  Entomology,  United  States  National  Museum,  Smithsonian  Insti¬ 
tution.  Washington,  D.  C. 

-This  study  was  made  possible  in  part  by  grant  GB-1697  from  the  National 
Science  Foundation. 


12 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


shorter  than  first  segment;  third  segment  small,  about  two-thirds  as  long  as  second 
segment;  fourth  segment  smallest,  about  one-third  as  long  as  second  segment; 
additional  segments  subequal  in  length.  Maxillary  palpus  four-segmented,  basal  two 
segments  subequal  in  length;  ultimate  segment  largest,  swollen  and  longer  than  basal 
three  combined.  Labial  palpus  three-segmented,  basal  two  segments  small,  sub¬ 
equal;  ultimate  segment  swollen  and  four  times  longer  than  penultimate  segment. 

Pronotum  moderately  coarsely,  moderately  densely  punctate;  punctures  on  disk 
separated  by  a  distance  almost  equal  to  their  width  and  each  puncture  bears  a 
long,  fine  golden  hair;  lateral  punctures  denser  than  those  on  disk;  surface  smooth 
between  punctures  or  at  most  vaguely  alutaceous;  lateral  margin  arcuate  but  not 
forming  continuous  arc  with  elytra;  finely,  evenly  margined  laterally;  base  bisinuate; 
anterolateral  angles  produced  anteriorly;  posterolateral  angles  obtuse.  Prosternum 
with  process  narrow  between  procoxae  but  expanded  and  three  times  wider  behind 
coxae;  expanded  posterior  portion  with  distinct  longitudinal  ridge  in  posterior  half; 
process  not  attaining  metasternum. 

Elytra  finely,  sparsely  punctate;  punctures  separated  by  a  distance  equal  to  twice 
their  width  and  each  with  a  long,  fine  golden  hair;  surface  between  punctures 
with  vague,  transverse  strigae.  Scutellum  not  visible. 

Ventral  surface  of  metathorax  alutaceous;  with  coarse,  shallow,  sparse  punctures;  t 
punctures  separated  by  one  or  one  and  a  half  times  their  width;  metasternal  wings 
very  short  and  feebly  curved  posteriorly;  metacoxal  processes  diverge  anteriorly, 
converge  and  then  expand  posteriorly,  conjointly  emarginate  medially  and  sulcate 
longitudinally. 

Abdominal  segments  with  surface  alutaceous.  First  abdominal  segment  with 
two  indefinite  rows  of  coarse  punctures,  one  medial  and  one  along  hind  margin; 
second  and  third  segments  twice  as  long  as  first  segment,  with  numerous  coarse 
punctures  separated  by  a  distance  equal  to  one  or  one  and  a  half  times  their  width; 
fourth  and  fifth  segments  each  with  coarse  median  puncture  bearing  a  tuft  of  long 
setae  and  each  with  a  transverse  row  of  coarse  punctures  along  anterior  and 
posterior  margins  of  segments  and  few  punctures  scattered  between  rows;  last 

abdominal  segment  with  a  few  coarse  punctures  laterally  and  medially,  a  flattened 
tonguelike  medial  process  with  short  golden  setae  on  hind  margin  at  apex  (difficult 
to  distinguish  on  dry  specimens  but  indicated  by  marginal  groove  and  golden  setae). 

Legs  smooth.  Proleg  with  coxa  globular;  trochanter  about  one-fifth  as  long  as 
femur  and  with  small  tuft  of  golden  pubescence  beneath  at  apex;  femur  swollen, 
almost  parallel  sided  in  basal  two-thirds,  feebly  notched  below  at  apex  and  short 
fringe  of  golden  hairs  in  notch;  tibia  slender,  inner  margin  almost  straight,  outer 
margin  arcuate,  upper  surface  with  a  longitudinal  series  of  coarse  seta-bearing 

punctures  on  distal  half;  tarsus  five-segmented  but  appears  tetramerous;  first  and 
second  tarsal  segments  expanded,  notched  apically,  subequal  in  size  and  both  with 
dense  pubescent  pad  beneath;  third  tarsal  segment  slightly  longer  than  second, 

about  half  as  wide  and  with  pubescent  pad  beneath;  fourth  tarsal  segment  very 
small  and  hidden  in  notched  apex  of  third  segment;  last  tarsal  segment  about  as 
long  as  third,  with  two  small  arcuate  claws  apically.  Middle  leg  with  coxa  globular; 
trochanter  about  one-fifth  as  long  as  femur  and  densely  pubescent  beneath  at  apex; 
femur  narrower  than  profemur  and  almost  parallel  sided,  ventral  surface  with 

dense  tuft  of  hairs  along  basal  three-fifths;  tibia  similar  to  protibia  but  upper 
surface  with  stride  on  distal  three-fifths  bearing  dense  row  of  short  golden  setae; 
tarsal  segments  similar  to  those  of  protarsus.  Hind  leg  with  trochanter  slightly 
more  than  one-third  as  long  as  metafemur;  femur  almost  parallel  sided  but  tapered 
distally;  tibia  slender,  feebly  arcuate,  with  several  rows  of  coarse  seta-bearing 


Figures  1-6,  Derovatellus  ibarrai  n.  sp.,  holotype.  1 — Habitus  view.  2 — Punc- 
tation,  elytral  disk.  3 — Head,  punctures  and  alutaceous  sculpture.  4 — Right 
paramere,  male  genitalia.  5 — Apex  of  median  lobe,  male  genitalia,  ventral  view. 
6 — Median  lobe,  male  genitalia,  lateral  view. 

Figures  7-12,  Derovatellus  lentus  (Wehncke).  7 — Punctation  elytral  disk. 
8 — Habitus  view.  9 — Head,  punctures  and  alutaceous  sculpture.  10 — Right  paramere, 
male  genitalia.  11 — Apex  median  lobe,  male  genitalia,  ventral  view.  12 — Median 
lobe,  male  genitalia,  lateral  view. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


13 


14 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


punctures  on  upper  and  lower  margins,  a  fringe  of  golden  natatory  hairs  on  lower 
surface  and  two  spurs  at  apex,  outer  spur  twice  as  long  as  inner  spur;  tarsal  seg¬ 
ments  slender,  first  segment  longest,  twice  as  long  as  second  segment;  second, 
third  and  last  segments  subequal  in  length;  fourth  segment  slightly  shorter  than 
third  segment;  tarsal  claws  short,  thick  and  blunt  apically,  inner  claw  almost  twice 
as  long  as  outer  claw;  all  five  tarsal  segments  with  fringe  of  golden  natatory  hairs. 
Male  genitalia  as  illustrated  (figs.  4,  5,  6). 

Female.  Allotype  similar  to  male  except  basal  two  segments  of  pro-  and  mesotarsus 
not  broadly  expanded,  trochanters  of  fore  and  middle  legs  and  ventral  surface  of 
mesofemur  without  dense  tuft  of  golden  setae. 

Holotype.  Guatemala,  [Izabal]  1  Mi.  N.  Morales  (Km.  239,  Atlantic 
Hwy.),  VIII-16-18-1965,  Paul  J.  Spangler.  Type  No.  68918,  deposited  in 
the  U.  S.  National  Museum.  Allotype.  Same  data  as  holotype.  Paratypes. 
12  $  S  ,  28  $  $  ,  same  data  as  holotype.  One  pair  deposited  in  the  Cali¬ 
fornia  Academy  of  Sciences  and  one  pair  in  the  collection  of  Dr.  Frank 
N.  Young. 

Variations.  The  type  series  varies  in  the  size  of  the  testaceous  elytral 
maculae.  In  some  specimens,  there  are  four  instead  of  three  transverse 
postmedian  maculae  on  each  elytron,  and  the  lateral  macula  along  the 
apical  margin  is  larger  and  more  distinctly  delimited.  In  a  few  specimens, 
the  postmedian  maculae  are  confluent  and  form  a  distinct  transverse 
band.  The  alutaceous  sculpture  on  the  base  of  the  head  is  less  distinct 
on  some  specimens  and  especially  on  those  that  are  teneral. 

Key  to  the  Species  of  Derovatellus 

1.  Size  5.0  mm.;  sides  of  pronotum  strongly  rounded  and  widest  at  midlength  then 

distinctly  constricted  at  base;  Argentina - BRUCHI  Zimmerman 

Size  less  than  4.1  mm.;  sides  of  pronotum  moderately  arcuate  and  widest  at  base, 

not  constricted  at  base -  2 

2.  Punctures  of  elytral  disk  fine  (fig.  2);  alutaceous  sculpture  of  head  restricted  to 

area  behind  eyes  (fig.  3);  apex  of  median  lobe  of  male  genitalia  with  two  long 

needlelike  projections  (fig.  5);  Guatemala - IBARRAI  n.  sp. 

Punctures  of  elytral  disk  coarse  (fig.  7);  alutaceous  sculpture  of  head  more 
extensive,  occurring  posteriorly  from  midlength  of  eyes  (fig.  9);  apex  of  median 
lobe  of  male  genitalia  with  two  short  spinous  projections  (fig.  11) -  3 

3.  Size  3.5  mm. -4.0  mm.;  Antilles  and  South  America - LENTUS  LENTUS  (Wehncke) 

Size  3.9  mm. -4.1  mm.;  Florida - LENTUS  FLORIDANUS  Fall 

Habitat.  On  Aug.  16,  1965,  a  single  specimen  of  Derovatellus  was 
found  after  about  a  half  hour  of  collecting  among  emergent  vegetation 
in  the  shallow  water  of  a  small  pond  (fig.  13)  in  a  pasture.  On  Aug.  18, 
1965,  I  returned  to  the  same  pond  to  look  for  more  specimens  of  Derova¬ 
tellus  and  collected  for  4  hours.  During  the  first  3  hours,  no  Derovatellus 
were  found  as  I  collected  in  the  pond  at  the  water’s  edge  and  I  began 
searching  for  other  habitat  niches.  Adjacent  to  the  pond  in  dense  grass 
there  were  depressions  containing  water  less  than  3  inches  deep.  In 
these  depressions  (fig.  14)  and  in  nearby  water-filled  hoof  prints,  1 
was  able  to  collect  41  specimens  of  Derovatellus  within  an  hour. 

A  close  lookout  was  kept  for  unusual  larvae  that  might  be  Derovatellus 
because  the  larva  of  this  genus  was  unknown.  Fortunately,  a  single, 
distinctive  larva  closely  resembling  the  larva  of  Macrovatellus  was  found 
and  is  described  below. 

This  larva  was  not  reared  to  confirm  its  identity,  but  it  is  assumed 
to  be  correctly  identified  through  association,  elimination  of  known  larvae, 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


15 


Figure  13,  Pond  at  type  locality  near  Morales,  Izabal,  Guatemala. 


Figure  14,  Habitat  niche  beside  pond  at  type  locality 


16 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


and  similarity  to  the  larva  of  Macrovatellus  mexicanus  Sharp  described 
by  Spangler  ( 1963) .  The  larvae  of  Derovatellus  and  Macrovatellus  have  the 
elongate  nasale  and  are  as  distinct  from  larvae  of  other  dytiscid  genera 
as  the  adults.  Derovatellus  and  Macrovatellus  along  with  a  third  genus, 
Vatellus,  comprise  the  very  distinctive  tribe  Vatellini.  Probably  when 
the  larva  of  Vatellus  is  discovered  it  also  will  have  the  elongate  nasale. 

Description  of  the  Larva 
(Figs.  15-21) 

Length  7.5  mm.,  greatest  width  of  pronotum  .85  mm.  Color  of  integument  white; 
dorsal  sclerites  of  thorax  and  abdomen  fusco-testaceous  except  small,  gray,  transverse 
macula  laterally  on  pronotum  as  illustrated  (fig.  18).  Head  also  fusco-testaceous 
except  for  spatulate  apex  of  nasale,  a  spot  at  base  of  nasale,  along  ecdysial  cleavage 
line  and  its  arms  and  around  ocelli  cream  colored;  ventral  surface  of  head  and 
mouthparts  more  nearly  testaceous.  Legs  white  except  extreme  base  of  coxae  at 
point  of  articulation  black. 

Head  subquadrate,  slightly  narrower  posteriorly,  with  distinctive  trifurcate  nasale 
as  long  as  length  of  head.  Median  branch  of  nasale  narrow  and  parallel  sided  to 
broadly  spatulate  apex;  dorsal  surface  glabrous  (fig.  19)  except  spatulate  apex 
with  ten  fine  hairs  along  anterior  margin;  ventrolateral  surface  with  two  large  spines 
on  each  side  on  anterior  half;  ventrally  with  group  of  20  to  23  small  spines  directly 
behind  spatulate  apex;  spatulate  apex  of  nasale  margined  ventrally  with  setae  as 
illustrated  (fig.  21).  Lateral  branches  of  nasale  about  two-thirds  as  long  as 
median  branch.  Each  lateral  branch  of  nasale  with  small  Y-shaped  fork  at  apex; 
five  ventrolateral  spines.  Ecdysial  cleavage  line  united  at  base  and  forked  at  basal 
third  of  head;  frontal  arms  curve  laterally  and  terminate  between  base  of  nasale 
and  antenna.  Dorsal  surface  of  head  glabrous  except  for  four  or  five  short 
stout  setae  laterally  in  a  line  below  eye  and  five  or  six  long  hairs  around  ocular 
area.  Ventral  surface  of  head  glabrous  except  two  posterior  tentorial  pits  at  about 
midlength  of  head.  Ocular  area  with  six  ocelli  in  two  close  vertical  rows  of 
three  ocelli  each.  Antenna  (fig.  16)  four-segmented;  second  and  third  segments 
longest,  subequal;  ultimate  segment  smallest,  slightly  less  than  half  as  long  as 
penultimate  segment  and  appendage  at  base  about  one-third  as  long  as  ultimate 
segment;  segments  glabrous.  Mandible  long,  slender,  falciform,  curved  upward 
and  inward  apically,  grooved  along  inner  surface  and  a  small  seta  ventrolaterally 
at  base.  Maxillary  stipes  rudimentary.  Maxillary  palpus  (fig.  15)  slender,  elongate, 
four-segmented;  first  and  third  segments  subequal  in  length;  second  segment  almost 
twice  as  long  as  first  segment;  ultimate  segment  slightly  more  than  half  as  long 
as  penultimate  segment;  first  segment  with  one  long  hair  anterolaterally,  other 
segments  glabrous.  Labium  small,  subrectangular,  with  one  slender  hair  and  two 
long  slender  spines  apically  between  palpi  (fig.  17);  ligula  absent;  labial  palpus 
very  slender,  two-segmented. 

Pronotum  subquadrate,  wider  basally,  with  five  or  six  long  hairs  laterally  and  a 
few  small  setae  along  hind  margin.  Mesonotum  slightly  wider  than  and  half  as 
long  as  pronotum,  with  numerous  setae  along  lateral  and  posterior  margins  of 
sclerite  and  a  few  setae  scattered  on  disk;  a  spiracular  opening  present  in  pleural 
region  below  anterolateral  angle  of  sclerite.  Metanotum  slightly  wider  than  and 
about  as  long  as  mesonotum;  setation  similar  to  mesonotum. 

Legs  elongate;  five-segmented;  coxa  long;  trochanter  about  one-third  as  long 
as  coxa;  femur  as  long  as  tibia  and  tarsus  combined;  tarsus  with  two  elongate, 
slender  claws,  outer  claw  slightly  shorter  than  inner  claw.  Coxa  with  two  short 
anterolateral  setae.  Trochanter  with  three  small  setae  on  ventral  surface.  Femur 
with  four  short  setae  on  anterior  (upper)  surface  and  two  long  setae  on  posterior 


— ^ 

Figures  15-21,  Derovatellus  ibarrai  n.  sp.,  larva.  15 — Right  maxillary  palpus, 
ventral  view.  16 — Right  antenna,  dorsal  view.  17 — Labium,  ventral  view. 
18 — Habitus  view.  19 — Nasale,  dorsal  view.  20 — Abdominal  segments  6  and  7, 
ventral  view.  21 — Apex  of  median  lobe  of  nasale,  anteroventral  view. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


1 


21 


18 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


edge.  Tibia  with  four  or  five  short  setae  on  anterior  surface  and  numerous  setae 
on  posterior  edge.  Tarsus  with  few  setae  on  anterior  surface  and  numerous  setae 
on  posterior  edge. 

Abdomen  with  eight  distinct  segments;  segments  1  through  6  with  dorsal 
sclerites;  segments  7  and  8  completely  sclerotized,  ringlike  (fig.  20).  Terga  of 
segments  1  through  7  with  setae  on  lateral  margins,  across  hind  margins,  and  a  few 
scattered  over  surface.  Segment  8  setose  over  surface,  prolonged  posteriorly 
into  a  long,  slender  cercus  beneath  which  arise  two  cerci  of  similar  shape  and  color. 
All  cerci  are  broken  but  apparently  were  unsegmented  and  all  have  numerous  coarse 
setae  throughout  their  length.  Lateral  margins  of  segments  1  through  7  each 
with  a  spiracle.  Mesopleura,  metapleura  and  pleural  folds  of  segments  1  through 
6  each  with  one  to  five  setae  arising  from  integument. 

Although  this  larva  resembles  the  larva  of  Macrovatellus  mexicanus, 
it  differs  in  the  following  ways:  dorsal  surface  of  median  branch  of  nasale 
glabrous;  each  lateral  branch  of  nasale  with  five  ventrolateral  spines; 
second  and  third  antennal  segments  longest,  subequal;  ultimate  antennal 
segment  slightly  less  than  half  as  long  as  penultimate  segment;  antennal 
segments  glabrous;  first  and  third  segments  of  maxillary  palpus  subequal 
in  length,  second  segment  almost  twice  as  long  as  first  segment,  first 
segment  with  one  long  hair  anterolaterally,  other  segments  glabrous. 

The  following  couplet  will  distinguish  the  larvae  of  the  two  genera. 

Second  and  third  antennai  segments  longest  and  subequal;  ultimate  segment  smallest, 

slightly  less  than  half  as  long  as  penultimate  segment - DEROVATELLUS 

First  and  third  antennal  segments  longest,  subequal;  ultimate  segment  smallest,  about 

one-seventh  as  long  as  penultimate  segment - MACROVATELLUS 


Literature  Cited 

Sharp,  D. 

1882.  Haliplidae,  Dytiscidae,  Gyrinidae,  Hydrophilidae,  Heteroceridae,  Parni- 
dae,  Georissidae,  Cyathoceridae.  Biologia  Centrali-Americana,  Insecta, 
Coleoptera  1(2):  1-144. 

Spangler,  P.  J. 

1963.  A  Description  of  the  Larva  of  Macrovatellus  mexicanus  Sharp  (Cole¬ 
optera:  Dytiscidae).  Coleop.  Bull.  17(4)  :97-100. 

Wehncke,  E. 

1876.  Neue  Dytisciden.  Stettiner  Ent.  Zeitung  37:356-360. 

Young,  F.  N. 

1954.  The  Water  Beetles  of  Florida.  Univ.  Florida  Studies  Biol.  Sci.  Ser., 
V  (1):  x  +  238  pp. 


LITERATURE  NOTICE 

KLUCZE  DO  OZNACZANIA  OWAKOW  POLSKI,  XII— COLEOPTERA,  24c— 
STAPHYLINIDAE:  EUAESTHETINAE— PAEDERINAE.  By  A.  Szujecki. 
Polski  Zwiazek  Entomologiczny,  Nr.  48  serii  klucyz,  pp.  1-74,  202  figs.  1965. — 
Another  in  the  series  of  keys  to  the  insects  of  Poland.  Besides  keys  and  illustrations, 
it  has  a  synonymical  checklist  of  genera  and  species  of  the  subfamilies  concerned. 

THE  GENERA  OF  THE  CHILOCORINI  (COLEOPTERA,  COCCINELLIDAE). 
By  E.  A.  Chapin.  Bull.  Mus.  Comp.  Zool.  133(4) : 227-271,  18  figs.  1965.— A  key 
to  and  characteristics  of  the  18  world  genera  are  included  in  this  important  paper 
in  a  much  neglected  family.  It  is  hoped  that  this  paper  will  help  stimulate 
interest  in  the  taxonomy  of  the  Coccinellidae. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


19 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  RAMBLINGS  IN  MEXICO 

By  Henry  F.  Howden1 

Introduction 

The  purpose  of  this  paper  is  to  describe  a  few  localities  in  Mexico,  visited 
between  1958  and  1964,  which  I  found  interesting  entomologically,  and 
to  give  road  information  and  some  details  on  lodging  for  the  areas 
mentioned.  In  many  areas  changes  can  be  rapid,  often  showing  improve¬ 
ment  on  the  main  routes  and  deterioration  in  less  traveled  areas.  In  general, 
the  American  Automobile  Association  catalog  on  Mexico  and  Central 
America  is  reliable,  and  hence  I  have  omitted  lodging  information  in  most 
cases  when  it  is  included  in  the  book.  Camping  is  difficult  in  most  areas 
and  there  are  no  established  campsites.  In  central  and  southern  Mexico 
camps  should  be  guarded  as  there  is  a  distinct  tendency  for  unwatched 
items  to  disappear.  For  anyone  collecting  off  of  the  major  tourist  routes, 
a  smattering  of  Spanish  is  desirable  and  in  some  places  essential. 

Since  a  meaningful  description  of  the  biotic  areas  would  be  lengthy  be¬ 
cause  of  the  extremely  varied  topography,  I  recommend  the  discussion  of 
the  biota  in  the  book  by  Leopold  (1959).  Goldman’s  (1951)  description 
of  his  collecting  from  1892  to  1906  is  also  worth  reading,  if  for  nothing 
else  than  to  compare  some  of  the  habitats  described  with  their  condition 
today. 

If  any  general  statement  can  be  made  concerning  insect  collecting  in 
Mexico,  it  is  that  the  best  collecting  comes  with  the  advent  of  the  spring 
rains.  These  begin  as  early  as  April  on  the  eastern  escarpment,  in  late 
June  in  the  central  plateau  and  in  the  western  mountain  ranges,  and  in 
mid-July  on  the  west  coast.  The  varied  topography  is  advantageous;  if 
collecting  is  poor  in  one  area,  one  can  often  move  30  or  40  miles  and  find 
better  conditions. 

Monterrey  to  Linares 

This  is  the  old  “main”  route  (Rt.  85)  to  Mexico  City;  there  are  a  number 
of  good  places  to  stay  but  really  modern  motels  are  scarce.  Most  are  10 
or  more  years  old  and  few,  even  in  the  lowlands,  are  air-conditioned.  The 
road  is  in  fair  condition,  but  is  not  “fast.” 

Monterrey,  Nuevo  Leon  (1800  ft.),  is  a  good  base  (Map  1).  It  is  one 
of  the  larger  cities  in  Mexico  and  has  many  modern  stores.  On  the  south 
side  of  the  city  is  the  Insituto  Tecnologico  y  de  Estudios  Superiores  de 
Monterrey,  with  an  active  group  of  entomologists  and  botanists  headed 
by  Dr.  D.  Enkerlin.  Just  across  the  street  from  the  Insituto  is  a  modern 
supermarket  and  5  miles  south  on  Rt.  85  is  the  Motel  Siesta.  This  is  an 
excellent  motel  for  families — kitchenettes,  two  swimming  pools,  and  good, 
safe  drinking  water.  The  motel  grounds  cover  6  acres  and  there  is  good 


1  Entomology  Research  Institute,  Research  Branch,  Canada  Department  of  Agri¬ 
culture,  Ottawa,  Ontario. 


20 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


thorn-scrub  all  around,  with  excellent  collecting.  From  the  southwest  edge 
of  Monterrey  a  paved  toll  road  goes  up  the  mountain  to  5000  feet,  ending 
at  Chipinque  Mesa.  This  area  has  many  species  of  oak  and  pine,  elements 
of  the  southeastern  forest  (for  example,  red  bud),  and  the  insect  fauna  is 
rich  and  varied.  It  represents  the  northern  limit  for  many  of  the  mesic 
forest  insects  (both  genera  and  species).  One  can  hire  burros  on  the 
mesa  and  reach  approximately  8000  feet  in  several  hours  if  one  can  stand 
the  ride!  In  the  low  country  within  a  20  mile  radius  of  Monterrey,  there 
are  many  varied  desert  habitats.  The  Instituto  has  a  desert  experiment 
station  on  Rt.  30  northeast  of  Monterrey,  near  the  town  of  Apodaca,  and 
entomologists  are  welcome.  Collecting  in  the  desert  area  is  best  in  April 
and  September,  but  it  is  good  on  the  Chipinque  Mesa  and  in  El  Diente 
Canyon  (behind  the  Siesta  Motel)  most  of  the  summer. 


Linares  to  Saltillo 

The  road  south  to  Linares  (Rt.  85)  traverses  mostly  desert  thorn-scrub 
country.  At  Linares  a  new,  very  good  paved  road  (Rt.  60)  goes  west 


Map  1.  Vicinity  of  Monterrey,  Nuevo  Leon. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


21 


to  Galeana  (Map  1)  and  to  the  Central  Highway  (Rt.  57).  The  highway 
passes  just  south  of  Galeana.  If  one  takes  the  road  to  Galeana  and  then 
west  to  Cerro  Potosi,  one  of  the  highest  mountains  in  Nuevo  Leon 
(12,500  ft.),  it  is  possible  to  drive  up  the  mountain  to  10,300  feet  on  a 
good  gravel  road  (any  car  could  make  it — at  least  in  1963)  where  it 
ends  at  a  telephone  microwave  tower.  At  this  altitude  there  is  a  beautiful 
pine  forest  and  areas  of  “alpine  type”  meadows.  Here  it  is  possible  to  camp 
(no  houses  and  only  a  few  people  tending  cattle).  The  peak  is  isolated 
and  the  fauna  seemed  almost  insular  and  depauperate,  but  very  interesting. 
After  returning  to  Rt.  60  from  Galeana,  if  one  goes  westward  and  then 
north  on  Rt.  57,  the  road  traverses  several  interesting  arid  areas.  Almost 
24  miles  south  of  Saltillo,  Coahuila,  a  paved  road  goes  in  an  easterly 
direction  to  the  town  of  San  Antonio  (Map  1).  (The  road  is  unmarked, 
but  was  the  only  paved  road  in  1963  leaving  the  main  highway  between  Rt. 
60  and  the  mountain  pass,  18  miles  southeast  of  Saltillo).  Follow  the 
San  Antonio  road  for  approximately  1 1  miles,  then  turn  north  on  a  good 
dirt  road  which  eventually  reaches  the  village  of  Jame.  The  area  around 
Jame  ranges  in  elevation  from  7000  to  9000  feet  and  contains  a  great 
variety  of  pine-oak  habitats.  Many  of  the  beetles  collected  in  the  area  were 
closely  related  or  identical  with  species  occurring  in  southeastern  Arizona. 
Good  camp  spots  are  frequent,  but  food  and  water  should  be  brought 
in.  The  area  is  easily  accessible  from  Saltillo  (1  hour  drive),  and  several 
motels  and  a  supermarket  make  Saltillo  a  good  base. 


Linares  to  Mexico  City 

If  one  goes  south  from  Linares  on  Rt.  85  instead  of  turning  off  to 
Galeana,  one  continues  through  lowland  thorn  forest  which  is  occasionally 
broken  by  wet  valleys  with  larger  trees  (cypress  along  the  rivers,  etc.) .  Near 
Ciudad  Mante,  Tamaulipas  (several  motels  here),  is  a  large  sugar  cane 
area,  and  tropical  elements  begin.  One  can  turn  on  to  Rt.  80  at  Antiguo 
Morelos  (Map  2).  After  a  drive  westward  of  about  22  miles  over  two 
low  ranges,  turn  right  onto  a  dirt  road  which  goes  north  seven  miles 
to  El  Salto  de  Agua,  San  Luis  Potosi.  El  Salto  is  a  large,  beautiful 
waterfall,  the  spray  from  the  fall  supporting  lush  tropical  vegetation  (a 
hydro-electric  development  may  change  this).  One  can  camp  near  the 
falls  or  use  a  small  native  motel  there  (food  and  water  should  be  carried 
in).  The  area  represents  the  approximate  northern  limit  for  many  tropical 
forms,  and  collecting  is  good  at  almost  any  time  of  the  year.  From  El 
Salto  it  is  an  easy  drive  on  Rts.  80  and  57  to  San  Luis  Potosi  (desert  with 
the  season  good  in  July  and  August)  or  on  Rt.  85  to  Tamazunchale.  The 
latter  is  in  a  valley  at  the  base  of  the  Sierra  Madre  Oriental  and  has  a 
distinctly  tropical  fauna  and  flora.  The  Hotel  San  Antonio  is  best,  and 
the  owners  are  helpful  in  directing  one  to  nearby  ranches.  Continuing 
south  on  Rt.  85  one  reaches  Jacala  (a  scrub  pine-oak  area)  after  3  or 
more  hours  of  tortuous  mountain  driving.  Simpson’s  Motel  in  Jacala  was 
a  good  base  (1960)  for  collecting  in  the  surrounding  mountains.  From 
Jacala  it  is  a  full  day’s  drive  to  Mexico  City,  where  one  has  a  choice 
of  many  types  of  lodging. 


22 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


East  of  Mexico  City 

East  of  Mexico  City  are  many  interesting  areas.  A  good  base  with 
much  of  archeological  interest  can  be  found  at  Tehuacan  in  a  deep  desert 
valley.  Teziutlan  at  the  eastern  edge  of  the  mountains  had  one  of  the 
few  remnants  of  easily  accessible  cloud  forest.  The  city  of  Veracruz  on 
the  lowland  coastal  plain  has  large  sandy  areas  south  of  the  city.  The  first 
two  cities  mentioned  each  have  one  small  hotel  while  Veracruz  has  a  num¬ 
ber  of  acceptable  old  hotels.  Each  is  approximately  one  day’s  drive  from 
Mexico  City. 

San  Andres  Tuxtla  is  an  easy  day’s  drive  south  of  the  city  of  Veracruz 
on  Rt.  180.  There  is  a  ferry  crossing  at  Alvarado  that  may  cause  some 
delay.  At  Catemaco  one  can  turn  left  on  a  dirt  road  by  the  school  and 
drive  around  the  north  side  of  Lake  Catemaco.  About  3.5  miles  from 
the  town  is  the  Hotel  Playa  Azul,  which  provides  good  accommodation 


Map  2.  Vicinity  of  El  Salto  de  Agua,  San  Luis  Potosi. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


23 


including  separate  cabins  if  desired.  The  lake  is  surrounded  by  an  old 
volcanic  rim  and  large  tracts  of  tropical  rain  forest.  The  area  represents 
the  northern  limits  of  many  Central  American  species,  including  howler 
monkeys.  Collecting  is  good  most  of  the  year  and  it  would  take  a  pro¬ 
tracted  visit  to  do  a  good  job  of  collecting  in  the  area. 


South  and  West  of  Mexico  City 

A  day’s  drive  south  of  Mexico  City  will  take  you  to  Acapulco  (ex¬ 
pensive!)  or  Oaxaca.  If  going  to  the  Acapulco  area,  Chilpancingo  makes 
a  good  base  with  two  fairly  good  (in  1961)  hotels.  From  there  one  can 
collect  in  the  unusual  Rio  Balsas  thorn  forest,  the  high  country  near 
Chilpancingo,  or  the  coastal  area  at  Acapulco.  The  fauna  of  the  area  is 
varied  and  contains  many  endemics. 

Toluca  is  two  hours’  drive  west  of  Mexico  City  on  Rt.  15.  The  road 
goes  through  some  beautiful  stands  of  pine  and  fir  before  leveling  out 
into  the  high  grassland  surrounding  Toluca.  The  Hotel  Rex  (45  pesos 
for  two  in  1958)  in  the  center  of  the  city  offered  good  accommodations 
and  a  fair  restaurant,  but  cars  had  to  be  put  in  a  garage  four  blocks  away. 
West  of  Toluca  on  Rt.  15  are  the  high  pine  forests  of  Michoacan.  Lodging 
can  be  found  at  Morelia,  Patzcuaro,  Uruapan  and  Zamora,  but  in  some 
cases  the  lodging  is  expensive.  Continuing  north  on  Rt.  15,  Guadalajara  and 
Tepic  have  excellent  places  to  stay,  but  the  country  surrounding  both  cities 
has  been  badly  cut  over.  However,  some  good  pine  areas  can  be  reached 
from  Guadalajara  (near  Tequila),  and  some  of  the  side  roads  near  Tepic 
are  well  worth  exploring. 


North  of  Mexico  City — Rt.  57 

Near  Queretaro  and  northward  to  the  United  States  border,  the  central 
plateau  is  either  grassland  or  desert  thorn-scrub,  with  the  topography 
fragmented  by  numerous  small  mountain  ranges.  Both  major  routes 
(45  and  57)  traverse  largely  desert  regions  where  collecting  is  best 
in  July  and  August.  Rt.  57  is  the  major  tourist  route  to  Mexico  City 
and  offers  the  more  modern  accommodations.  Queretaro  has  at  least 
one  modern  motel  on  the  new  highway  on  the  west  side  of  the  city.  San 
Luis  Potosi,  approximately  100  miles  north  of  Queretaro  on  Rt.  57, 
has  several  new  (1959)  motels  near  the  main  road  junction.  The  sur¬ 
rounding  country  has  a  variety  of  desert  vegetation  and  is  seemingly  near 
the  southern  limit  of  mesquite  on  the  central  plateau. 

Matehuala  is  the  next  town  north  of  San  Luis  Potosi  offering  modern 
accommodations.  A  large  modern  motel  (1958)  just  north  of  town  ap¬ 
peared  to  be  an  excellent  base  for  desert  collecting,  as  areas  of  grassland, 
mesquite,  acacia,  yucca,  and  creosote  bush  were  within  a  few  miles. 
Saltillo,  which  has  already  been  mentioned  (Map  1),  is  the  next  sizeable 
city  north  of  Matehuala. 


24 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


North  of  Mexico  City — Rt.  45 

The  cities  on  the  western  side  of  the  central  plateau,  Aguascalientes, 
Zacatecas,  Durango,  Hidalgo  de  Parral,  and  Chihuahua,  all  have  some 
good  accommodations,  but  motels  are  not  numerous.  Route  45  is  not  a 
main  tourist  route,  and  even  in  a  city  of  the  size  of  Durango  there  are 
only  two  places  listed  by  the  American  Automobile  Association.  The 
country  near  Aguascalientes  and  Zacatecas  has  been  so  intensively  farmed 
and  grazed  that  general  collecting  is  difficult.  Durango  makes  a  better 
base  (Campo  Mexico  Court),  and  collecting  to  the  west  of  the  city  on 
Rt.  40  is  good.  The  roads  between  Durango  and  Chihuahua,  either  via 
Torreon  or  via  Hidalgo  de  Parral,  traverse  a  number  of  desert  habitats, 
with  the  area  near  Rodeo,  Durango,  on  Rt.  45  having  a  rich  desert  flora. 
A  variety  of  habitats  can  be  reached  from  Chihuahua,  the  first  city  with 
accommodations  (Santa  Rita  Motel)  south  of  El  Paso  and  Ciudad  Juarez. 
Twenty-two  miles  north  of  Chihuahua  on  Rt.  45  a  dirt  road  runs  westward 
20  miles  to  the  Majalca  national  forest,  composed  mainly  of  oak  and 
pinyon  pine.  The  road  reaches  an  elevation  of  7000  feet  and  a  passenger 
car  can  usually  make  it!  Between  Chihuahua  and  El  Paso  near  Villa 
Ahumada  is  an  interesting  and  extensive  sand  dune  area,  reminding  one 
of  White  Sands,  New  Mexico.  The  fauna  is  scanty  but  interesting,  some 
Scarabaeidae  at  least  being  endemic  to  the  area. 


The  West  Coast,  Tepic  to  Mazatlan 

Just  north  of  Tepic,  Rt.  46  (the  route  signs  are  often  lacking)  runs 
from  Rt.  15  to  the  town  of  San  Bias  on  the  coast.  Several  hotels  (of 
dubious  quality)  are  in  or  near  the  town.  Nearby  are  thick  groves  of 
palm,  fig,  and  mangrove,  and  collecting  can  be  excellent  in  July.  On  Rt.  15 
north  of  San  Bias  much  of  the  land  is  cut-over  thorn-scrub.  Near 
Mazatlan  (Map  3)  some  good  areas  of  the  Sinaloan  thorn  forest 
still  exist.  On  the  north  side  of  Mazatlan  there  are  a  number  of 
good  (but  relatively  expensive)  motels  and  hotels  along  a  beautiful  sand 
beach  (the  Motel  Sands  at  $8.00  for  two  people  was  good  in  1964). 
North  of  most  of  the  motels  there  is  a  traffic  circle  and  Rt.  15  turns  sharply 
inland.  If  one  continues  along  the  coast  north  of  the  traffic  circle,  first  on  a 
paved,  then  on  a  dirt  road  for  five  miles,  several  low  hills  can  be  seen 
to  the  right.  A  dirt  road  leads  to  a  small  quarry  at  the  base  of  the  first 
hill.  Several  dirt  roads  radiate  from  the  quarry  through  the  thorn-scrub. 
In  mid-July,  1964,  ten  days  after  the  first  heavy  rain,  nearly  100  species 
of  Cerambycidae  were  collected  near  the  base  of  the  hill  in  a  five  day 
period.  Other  groups  showed  nearly  as  much  diversity,  but  by  early 
August  the  number  of  species  active  in  the  area  was  appreciably  reduced. 


Mazatlan  to  Durango 

At  Villa  Union,  17  miles  south  of  Mazatlan  on  Rt.  15,  Rt.  40  extends 
eastward  to  the  city  of  Durango  (a  full  day’s  drive).  For  the  first  30 
miles  the  road  winds  through  dense  thorn  forest.  The  road  then  starts 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


25 


to  climb  and  becomes  extremely  sinuous  (hairpin  curves!).  Eight  miles 
west  of  El  Palmito,  near  the  state  line  of  Sinaloa  and  Durango,  there  are 
several  “pull-offs”  where  one  can  camp  (there  are  only  three  or  four  places 
where  this  is  possible  in  60  or  more  miles  of  the  road)  at  an  elevation 
of  approximately  6000  feet.  Mixed  pine-oak  forest  extends  from  this 
area  to  within  25  miles  of  the  city  of  Durango.  East  of  El  Palmito  the 
road  continues  upward  through  some  of  the  most  spectacular  scenery  in 
Mexico.  After  some  700  sharp  curves  the  top  of  the  escarpment  is  reached 
at  Buenos  Aires  (approximately  9000  ft.).  Between  Buenos  Aires  and 
El  Salto  (altitude  varying  from  8000  to  9000  ft.)  there  are  many  possible 
campsites.  The  best  one  is  10  miles  west  of  El  Salto,  just  east  of  Las 
Adjuntas.  Rt.  40  at  Km.  1080  crosses  an  abandoned  railroad  bed  which 
is  now  used  as  a  road.  Turn  north  onto  the  road  bed  and  after  100  yards 
turn  north  again  into  a  small  pine  grove  which  is  a  good  campsite.  There 
are  some  good  springs  at  the  base  of  a  steep  hill  across  a  large  meadow. 


Map.  3. 


Vicinity  of  Mazatlan,  Sinaloa. 


26 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


The  road  bed  stays  firm,  even  in  the  rainy  season.  The  climate  is  cool,  75° 
being  the  highest  temperature  recorded  for  the  summer  of  1964.  However, 
the  insects  came  in  numbers  to  a  blacklight  at  temperatures  of  50°,  and 
there  was  often  more  insect  activity  on  rainy  nights  than  on  dry  ones!  From 
El  Salto  (some  food  and  gas  can  be  obtained  here)  it  is  a  two  and  a  half 
hour  drive  to  the  City  of  Durango  (first  good  lodgings  after  leaving 
Mazatlan). 


Mazatlan  to  Nogales 

North  of  Mazatlan  the  size  and  density  of  the  thorn  forest  is  gradually 
reduced.  Ciudad  Obregon,  approximately  a  nine  hour  drive  from  Mazatlan 
on  Rt.  15,  lies  in  the  middle  of  the  Sonoran  desert  and  makes  an  excellent 
base.  There  are  several  good  dirt  roads  leading  to  the  coast  (directions 
need  to  be  obtained  locally  as  the  roads  are  unmarked  and  frequently 
changed)  as  well  as  several  good  collecting  spots  along  the  Rio  Yaqui, 
particularly  along  the  road  leading  to  the  Obregon  dam  (turnoff  at 
Esperanza  just  north  of  Cd.  Obregon).  If  one  follows  the  Obregon  dam 
road  for  approximately  seven  miles  it  is  possible  to  turn  right  and  follow 
a  fairly  good  dirt  road  to  the  foothills  of  the  Sierra  Madre.  In  this  area 
there  are  many  good  collecting  spots  and  campsites  are  not  difficult  to 
find.  North  of  Ciudad  Obregon,  Guaymas  and  Hermosillo  have  good 
accommodations,  and  the  road  passes  through  country  similar  to  areas  in 
southwestern  Arizona.  However,  some  of  the  fauna,  at  least  around 
Hermosillo,  does  not  extend  into  Arizona,  and  in  a  few  instances  shows 
a  distinct  relationship  with  the  fauna  of  central  Baja  California. 


Literature  Cited 

Goldman,  E.  A. 

1951.  Biological  investigations  in  Mexico.  Smithsonian  Misc.  Coll.  115:1-476. 
Leopold,  A.  S. 

1959.  Wildlife  of  Mexico — The  game  birds  and  mammals.  Univ.  of  Calif. 
Press,  Berkeley,  556  pp. 


BEETLE  TALK 


The  following  proposals  concerning  the  scientific  names  of  beetles  were  placed 
before  the  International  Commission  on  Zoological  Nomenclature. 

Criocerus  sexpunctata  Fabricius,  1792  (Insecta,  Coleoptera):  Proposed  rejection 
as  a  nomen  oblitum.  R.  F.  Smith,  1965,  Bull.  Zool.  Nomenclature  22(4) : 246. 

Xyleborus  Bowdich,  1825  (Insecta,  Coleoptera):  Proposed  suppression  under  the 
plenary  powers.  R.  T.  Thompson,  1965,  Bull.  Zool.  Nomenclature  22(4)  :269. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


27 


DESCRIPTION  AND  BIOLOGICAL  NOTES  ON  THE  LARVAE 

OF  PHRADONOMA  TRICOLOR 
(COLEOPTERA:  DERMESTIDAE) 

By  E.  J.  Ford,  Jr.1  and  J.  ML  Kingsolver2 


Specimens  of  a  Dermestid  beetle  which  appeared  to  be  a  species  of 
Trogoderma  were  collected  from  the  hold  of  a  ship  in  the  Middle  and 
Far  East  trade  at  Baltimore,  Maryland,  May,  1965,  by  E.  J.  Ford,  Jr. 
and  G.  M.  Prall.  These  insects  were  found  in  debris  containing  cumin  seed 
(Cuminum  odoratum),  sesame  seed  (Sesamum  indicum),  peanut  shells 
(Arachis  hypogaea),  other  insects,  burlap  strands,  paper  bits,  etc.,  and 
consisted  of  2  male  adults,  1  pupa,  1  larva,  and  16  cast  skins.  All 
specimens  were  collected  in  a  small  area  suggesting  they  were  the  same 
species.  Further  examination  in  the  laboratory  verified  this  association 
as  follows:  the  2  males  were  identified  as  Phradonoma  tricolor  (Arrow), 
the  pupa  found  in  the  last  larval  skin  (typical  of  the  Anthrenini )  had 
matured  enough  to  be  determined  as  a  female  of  P.  tricolor;  this  larval 
skin  agreed  in  all  important  characters  with  the  16  cast  skins  and  the  larva. 

Examination  of  other  insects  in  the  debris  indicated  that  some  organism 
had  been  feeding  on  the  dead  specimens.  Assuming  that  the  organism 
was  the  larvae  of  Phradonoma  suggests  that  Phradonoma  is  not  likely  to 
be  a  pest  of  stored  foods  but  may  be  found  associated  with  these  products 
when  they  are  infested  with  other  insects. 

The  genus  Phradonoma  Jacquelin  du  Val  is  very  closely  related  to 
Trogoderma  Berthold  and  distinguished  in  adults  only  by  the  presence 
of  a  row  of  strong  teeth  on  the  outer  margin  of  the  fore  tibiae  in 
Phradonoma  (figs.  9  &  10).  An  additional  character  which  may  show 
some  variation  is  that  in  the  mesocoxal  lines  in  Phradonoma,  the  lines 
extend  nearly  to  the  postero-lateral  corners  of  the  metasternum,  but  in 
the  species  of  Trogoderma  seen,  these  lines  extend  only  half  that  distance. 

The  morphology  of  the  larva  of  Phradonoma  reflects  the  proximity  of 
Trogoderma  in  that  no  consistent  characters  were  found  which  are  ex¬ 
clusively  those  of  either  genus.  The  interdigitation  of  characters  suggests 
that  Phradonoma  might  eventually  be  considered  a  species  group  of 
Trogoderma. 

The  following  is  apparently  the  first  description  of  the  larva  of  a  species 
of  Phradonoma. 


Phradonoma  tricolor  (Arrow) 

Mature  larva:  Length — 6  mm.,  color  light  clear  yellow  to  mahogany  brown 
with  anterior  half  of  each  thoracic  and  abdominal  sternite  slightly  darker  in  the 
lightly  colored  specimens.  Typical  Trogoderma- like  shape,  legs  and  sternites 
as  in  Trogoderma.  Erect  spicasetae  of  each  tergite  mixed  long  and  short,  tending 


1  Plant  Quarantine  Division,  Agric.  Res.  Serv.,  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture, 
Baltimore,  Maryland. 

2  Entomology  Research  Division,  Agric.  Res.  Serv.,  U.  S.  Department  of  Agri¬ 
culture,  Washington,  D.  C. 


28 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


to  be  single-ranked;  acrotergal  setae  long,  !4  to  Vi  as  long  as  tergite,  all  extending 
across  acrotergal  suture  (fig.  2),  no  fine  spicasetae  anterior  of  medial  row  of  erect 
spicasetae,  no  spicasetae  inserted  on  posterior  margins  of  tergites;  hastisetal  tufts 
dense  on  newly  emerged  larvae,  but  are  easily  abraded.  Acrotergal  sutures  strong 
on  all  abdominal  tergites  and  meso-  and  metathoracic  tergites.  Antennae  with 
second  segment  nearly  twice  as  long  as  first,  terminal  segment  short  (fig.  3a), 
occasionally  bent  at  an  angle  (fig.  3b);  inner  face  of  basal  segment  with  4-7  short, 
curved  setae  scarcely  extending  beyond  base  of  second  segment  which  itself 
is  devoid  of  setae  in  all  specimens  examined.  Labrum  as  in  fig.  1;  distal  sensory 
papillae  as  in  figs.  5  or  6;  proximal  sensory  pores  8  or  9. 

Specimens  deposited  in  U.  S.  National  Museum. 

Larvae  of  Phradonoma  tricolor  have  been  intercepted  several  times  in 
eastern  United  States  ports  of  entry.  It  apparently  has  not  become  estab¬ 
lished  outside  of  the  Middle  East. 

Comparative  notes:  The  larvae  of  Phradonoma  tricolor  can  be  distin¬ 
guished  from  the  species  of  Trogoderma  with  a  long  second  antennal 
segment  by  the  following  emendation  to  the  key  included  by  Beal,  1960 
(p.  3,  couplet  3,  second  choice) : 

Spicasetae  of  seventh  and  eighth  abdominal  tergites  not  noticeably  stouter  than 
spicasetae  of  anterior  tergites;  submedian  row  of  large  spicasetae  on  these 
tergites  more  or  less  continuous;  spicasetae  not  in  compact  separated  groups 

of  two  or  three -  3a 

3a  Sclerotized  area  on  seventh  abdominal  tergum  that  bears  hastisetal  tuft  separated 
from  rest  of  tergum  by  narrow  membranous  area  (somewhat  as  in  Anthrenus) 

- TROGODERMA  PRIMUM  (Jayne) 

Sclerotized  area  bearing  hastisetal  tuft  not  separated  from  rest  of  tergum -  3b 

3b  Distal  sensory  papillae  arranged  in  a  circular  cup  (fig.  7);  third  segment  of  antennae 

nearly  as  long  as  second  (fig.  4) - TROGODERMA  ANGUSTUM  (Solier) 

Distal  sensory  papillae  as  in  fig.  5  or  6;  third  antennal  segment  less  than  V2  as 

long  as  the  second - PHRADONOMA  TRICOLOR  (Arrow) 

Only  two  known  New  World  species  of  Trogoderma,  primum  and 
ballfinchae  Beal,  share  the  distinctive  arrangement  of  distal  papillae  found 
in  P.  tricolor,  but  these  can  easily  be  distinguished  by  the  characters  in 
the  emended  key  above.  Two  species  doubtfully  referred  to  Trogoderma 
by  Beal  (l.c.,  p.  24),  boganense  Armstrong  and  carteri  Armstrong,  have 
the  same  papillar  arrangement  but  can  easily  be  separated  from  other 
Trogoderma  by  the  distinctive  fiscisetae  (Beal,  l.c.,  fig.  7). 

Trogoderma  simplex  Jayne  is  separated  in  the  original  Beal  key. 

Trogoderma  angustum  (Solier)  perhaps  most  resembles  P.  tricolor  in 
general  appearance  but  can  easily  be  distinguished  by  the  arrangement  of 
the  distal  papillae  of  the  labrum,  the  relative  lengths  of  the  second  and 
third  antennal  segments,  the  presence  or  absence  of  setae  on  the  second 
antennal  segment,  and  the  relative  length  of  the  acrotergal  setae.  All 
of  these  characteristics  are  illustrated  in  the  plate. 

Orphinus  fulvipes  (Guerin)  also  has  a  “four  plus  two”  arrangement  of 
the  distal  papillae,  but  the  segment  containing  four  papillae  is  circular 
instead  of  C-shaped.  This  species  is  easily  separated  from  the  other 
species  mentioned  in  this  paper  by  the  short  second  segment  of  the 
antennae  and  the  separate  sclerites  bearing  hastisetal  tufts  in  the  mem¬ 
brane  posterior  to  the  seventh  abdominal  tergite. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


29 


Literature  Cited 


Beal,  R.  S.,  Jr. 

1954.  Biology  and  taxonomy  of  the  nearctic  species  of  Trogoderma  (Cole- 
optera:  Dermestidae).  Univ.  Calif.  Pubs.,  Ent.  10:35-102. 

1960.  Descriptions,  biology  and  notes  on  the  identification  of  some  Trogoderma 
larvae  (Coleoptera:  Dermestidae).  U.  S.  Dept.  Agric.  Tech.  Bull. 
1228:1-26. 

Hinton,  H.  E. 

1945.  A  monograph  of  the  beetles  associated  with  stored  products,  Vol.  1, 
pp.  viii,  1-441.  British  Museum  (Natural  History),  London. 


Figures  1-3,  5,  6,  Phradonoma  tricolor,  larva.  1 — labrum.  2 — abdominal  tergite  2. 
3a  b — antenna.  5 — normal  distal  sensory  papillae  of  labrum.  6 — fractured  arrange¬ 
ment  of  sensory  papillae  of  labrum. 

Figures  4,  7,  Trogoderma  angustum,  larva.  4 — antenna.  7 — distal  papillae. 
Figure  8,  Orphinus  fulvipes,  larva.  Distal  papillae. 

Figure  9,  Phradonoma,  adult.  Fore  tibia. 

Figure  10,  Trogoderma,  adult.  Fore  tibia. 


30 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


BEMBIDION  (AMERIZUS)  OBLONGULUM  MANNERHEIM 
IN  NEW  MEXICO  (COLEOPTERA:  CARABIDAE)  WITH 
NOTES  ON  TRANSCONTINENTAL  DISPERSAL  IN 

PLEISTOCENE  TIME. 

By  George  E.  Ball1 

A  NEW  RECORD.  Specimens  of  this  species  were  collected  by  me 
in  two  localities  in  the  Sangre  de  Cristo  Mountains  (the  Las  Vegas  Range 
of  Fall  and  Cockerell,  1907: 148),  San  Miguel  County,  New  Mexico:  two 
males,  Mosimann  Ranch,  15.7  mi.  west  of  Sapello,  N.  M.  Route  266, 
June  20,  1963;  one  female,  Holy  Ghost  Canyon,  14  mi.  north  of  Pecos, 
N.  M.  Route  63,  June  24,  1959.  The  former  locality  is  in  the  “Beulah 
District’'  (Fall  and  Cockerell,  1907:145),  and  its  position  is  shown 
on  the  Santa  Fe,  New  Mexico  sheet  (U.  S.  Geological  Survey,  NI  13-2). 
The  collections  were  made  at  an  elevation  of  about  8,200  feet,  in  damp 
litter,  in  Canadian  Zone  forest  consisting  of  aspen,  alder,  Douglas  Fir, 
Engelmann  and  Colorado  Blue  Spruce.  Adults  of  oblongulum  were  not 
found  in  August,  although  1  searched  for  them.  The  presence  of  adults 
early  in  the  summer  and  their  absence  later  suggests  that  this  species,  like 
the  similar  eastern  Bembidion  wingatei  Bland,  is  an  imaginal  hibernator 
(Lindroth,  1955:77). 

Previously,  oblongulum  was  known  only  from  the  Pacific  Northwest 
(Lindroth,  1963:404).  Probably  it  occurs  throughout  the  Rocky  Moun¬ 
tains  at  high  elevations,  from  Idaho  southward,  but  has  not  been 
collected  in  this  area  because  individuals  are  small  and  inconspicuous,  and 
not  readily  found  because  of  the  habitat,  and  because  adults  are  not 
present  at  the  height  of  the  collecting  season. 

INTRASPECIFIC  COMPARISONS.  I  have  compared  the  New 
Mexico  specimens  with  five  specimens  of  oblongulum  collected  at  Tele¬ 
graph  Point,  near  Kwinitsa,  British  Columbia.  The  eyes  of  the  New 
Mexico  specimens  are  slightly  flatter.  The  two  groups  also  differ  in  total 
length:2  New  Mexico  males,  4.52-4.88  mm.,  females,  4.80  mm.;  British 
Columbia  males,  4.18-4.25  mm.,  females,  4.18-4.32  mm.  This  difference 
is  not  surprising  in  view  of  the  small  size  of  the  samples,  and  considerable 
difference  in  latitude  between  the  two  areas. 

INTERSPECIFIC  COMPARISONS.  The  species  oblongulum  and  the 
species  wingatei  are  very  similar  to  one  another,  and  Lindroth  (1963:406) 
suggested  that  the  two  might  be  geographically  isolated  subspecies  of  a 
single  species  ( wingatei  ranges  from  Newfoundland  to  northern  Michigan 
and  south  in  the  mountains,  to  North  Carolina).  The  New  Mexico  record 
extends  the  range  of  oblongulum  about  400  miles  eastward,  and  hence 
closer  to  wingatei.  Therefore,  it  is  worth  comparing  the  New  Mexico 


1  Department  of  Entomology,  University  of  Alberta.  Edmonton,  Alberta,  Canada. 

2  Total  length  is  the  sum  of  three  measurements:  distance  from  base  of  mandible 
to  posterior  margin  of  compound  eye;  distance  from  anterior  to  posterior  margin  of 
pronotum,  along  mid-line;  and  distance  from  basal  transverse  line  to  apex,  of  longest 
elytron. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


31 


specimens  with  representatives  of  wingatei  to  see  if  the  former  are 
morphologically  as  well  as  geographically  intermediate  between  the  two 
nominal  species. 

The  New  Mexico  specimens  are  like  wingatei  in  form  of  the  eyes, 
but  differ  in  form  of  the  pronotum  and  of  the  median  lobe  of  the  male. 
They  are  also  larger  in  size.  These  specimens  are  more  like  wingatei 
than  are  the  western  specimens  of  oblongulum,  but  the  New  Mexico 
group  cannot  be  regarded  as  an  intergrading  population.  Therefore,  1 
continue  to  regard  the  eastern  and  western  segregates  of  this  complex 
as  distinct  species. 

ZOOGEOGRAPHIC AL  CONSIDERATIONS.  The  greater  number  of 
species  of  Amerizus  in  the  west  and  the  presence  there  of  the  related  sub¬ 
genus  Lionepha  Casey  suggests  that  Amerizus  is  of  western  origin.  The 
marked  similarities  between  oblongulum  and  wingatei  suggests  that  these 
two  species  are  closely  related,  that  is,  they  shared  a  relatively  recent 
common  ancestry.  Of  the  two,  wingatei  seems  to  be  the  more  derivative. 
Further,  both  forms  are  relatively  cold-adapted,  for  they  occur  either  in 
cool  sheltered  situations  in  lowlands,  or  else  at  high  elevations.  (For  ex¬ 
ample,  Carl  H.  Lindroth  and  I  collected  specimens  of  oblongulum  in 
northern  British  Columbia,  on  a  mountainside,  at  an  elevation  of  about 
2,000  feet,  in  an  area  just  recently  cleared  of  snow,  and  close  to  a  snow 
patch.  Even  though  the  ground  and  air  were  cool,  the  beetles  were  very 
active.) 

These  facts  suggest  that  the  common  ancestor  of  oblongulum  and 
wingatei  originated  in  the  west,  and  could  have  spread  eastward  across  the 
continent  during  a  glacial  period,  in  the  boreal  forest  south  of  the  ice.  As 
warming  occurred  in  an  interglacial  period,  the  ancestral  species  survived 
in  cooler  and  damper  areas.  In  the  mountainous  east  and  west,  the  species 
was  able  to  spread  southward  at  high  elevations,  but  in  the  central  part  of 
the  continent,  the  populations  had  to  spread  northward,  as  the  ice  melted, 
to  find  suitable  habitats.  Clinal  differentiation  may  have  taken  place,  so 
that  the  geographically  extreme  populations  became  quite  different  from 
one  another.  A  later  glaciation  may  have  eliminated  the  populations  in  the 
central  part  of  the  continent.  With  the  retreat  of  the  ice,  the  surviving 
populations  in  the  east  and  west  moved  northward,  repopulating  part,  but 
not  all,  of  the  terrain  that  had  been  ice-covered,  and  giving  rise  to  the  pres¬ 
ent  disjunct  distribution. 

This  hypothesis  requires  a  minimum  of  two  glacial  periods  to  produce 
the  distribution  pattern  of  the  oblongulum-wingatei  stock.  Assuming  that 
only  two  glacial  periods  were  involved,  and  that  they  were  the  last  two 
(Iowan  and  Wisconsin — Karlstrom,  1961 ),  the  entire  process,  from  spread¬ 
ing  to  differentiation  and  partial  extinction,  required  a  time  span  of  about 
70,000  years. 

A  number  of  species  or  species  pairs  of  northern  carabids  show  a  dis¬ 
tribution  pattern  similar  to  the  one  described  above,  and  the  development 
of  these  patterns  can  be  explained  in  the  same  way. 

For  a  more  detailed  account  of  range  change  of  an  insect  group  during 
and  since  the  Pleistocene,  see  Ricker  (1964).  See  especially  page  67  for  a 
consideration  of  east-west  disjuncts. 


32 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


Literature  Cited 

Fall,  H.  C.,  and  T.  D.  A.  Cockerell 

1907.  The  Coleoptera  of  New  Mexico.  Trans.  Amer.  Ent.  Soc.  33: 145-272. 
Karlstrom,  T.  N.  V. 

1961.  Glacial  history  of  Alaska:  its  bearing  on  paleoclimatic  theory.  New  York 
Acad.  Sci.  Ann.  95,  Art.  1:290-340. 

Lindroth,  C.  H. 

1955.  The  carabid  beetles  of  Newfoundland,  including  the  French  islands  St. 
Pierre  and  Miquelon.  Opusc.  Ent.  Suppl.  22:1-168,  58  figs. 

1963.  The  ground  beetles  of  Canada  and  Alaska.  Part  3.  Opusc.  Ent.  Suppl.  24: 
201-408,  figs.  102-207. 

Ricker,  W.  E. 

1964.  Distribution  of  Canadian  stoneflies.  Gewasser  und  Abwasser,  Heft  34/35 
s.  50-51,  Verh.  3  Int.  Symp.  Plecopteren  (1964)  Bagel,  Diisseldorf. 


LITERATURE  NOTICE 

BIOGEOGRAPHY  OF  THE  SOUTHERN  END  OF  THE  WORLD.  By  P.  J.  Dar¬ 
lington,  Jr.  Harvard  University  Press,  Cambridge,  Mass,  vii,  236  pp.,  illus.  1965. — The 
southern  tip  of  South  America,  Tasmania  with  the  southeastern  corner  of  Australia, 
and  New  Zealand  share  many  special  groups  of  plants  and  animals  in  spite  of 
the  fact  that  these  places  are  now  separated  by  wide  ocean  gaps.  Darlington 
describes  these  distributions  and  tries  to  explain  them  on  evidence  from  climates 
past  and  present,  geological  history,  paleontology,  modes  of  dispersal,  and  ecology. 
As  with  his  previous  book,  Darlington’s  unusually  lucid  and  candid  style  of  writing 
makes  the  usually  difficult  subject  of  biogeography  rather  understandable. 

A  NEW  GENUS  OF  AUSTRALIAN  CLAVICORN  COLEOPTERA,  PROBABLY 
OF  A  NEW  FAMILY.  By  R.  A.  Crowson.  Proc.  Linn.  Soc.  New  South  Wales 
89(2)  :241-245,  17  figs.  1964. — The  larva  and  adult  of  Cavognatha  pullivora,  n.g., 
n.sp.,  are  fully  described  and  illustrated.  Larvae  were  collected  from  nestlings  of 
a  bird  and  were  reared  to  adulthood.  The  adults  go  to  couplet  12  in  Crowson’s  1955 
key  to  clavicorn  families,  but  they  can  not  be  placed  in  either  the  Cucujidae  or 
Silvanidae.  The  most  distinctive  feature  of  this  beetle  is  on  the  mandibles;  the 
lateral  surface  is  deeply  channeled  and  has  an  opening  by  a  narrow  passage  into 
a  large  ovate  internal  cavity.  Crowson  suggests  that  the  cavity  might  harbor  bac¬ 
terial  spores  as  do  the  mandibular  cavities  of  some  sphindids. 


NOTICE 

In  1965  the  Journal  of  Stored  Products  Research  began.  It  is  a  quarterly 
dealing  with  the  biology,  ecology,  physiology,  behaviour,  genetics,  or  control  of 
stored  products  organisms.  The  editors  are  at  the  Pest  Infestation  Laboratory, 
Slough,  England,  a  first-class  organization  in  the  study  of  stored  products  pests; 
their  advisory  board  is  international.  Most  articles  in  the  first  issue  concern  beetles, 
and  we  can  probably  look  forward  to  many  more  like  articles  because  most  of  such 
pests  are  beetles.  Annual  subscription  rates  are  TblO  or  $30.00  for  libraries,  govern¬ 
ment  departments,  industrial  establishments,  etc.,  and  Ib5  or  $15.00  for  individuals. 
The  publisher  is  Pergamon  Press,  Headington  Hill  Hall,  Oxford,  England,  or  44-01 
21st  Street,  Long  Island  City,  N.  Y.  11101,  U.  S.  A. 


—  BACK  ISSUES— 


The  Coleopterists'  Bulletin 


Per 

Single 

V  ohtme 

Issue 

Vol. 

3, 

1949,  6  issues 

(Nos.  I  &  2  o.p.)  $5.00 

$1.00 

Vol. 

4, 

1950,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol. 

5. 

1951,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol. 

6, 

1952,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol. 

7, 

1953,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol. 

8, 

1954,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol. 

9, 

1955,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol. 

10, 

1956,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol. 

11, 

1957,  2  issues 

5.00 

3.00 

Vol. 

12, 

1958,  1  issue 

5.00 

5.00 

Vol. 

13, 

1959,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol. 

14, 

1960,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol. 

15, 

1961,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol. 

16, 

1962,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol. 

17, 

1963,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol. 

18, 

1964,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

(above  prices  Postpaid) 


. ATTENTION  READERS! . 

From  time  to  time  we  receive  requests  from  our  subscribers  who 
wish  to  complete  their  holdings  of  the  Bulletin.  We  would  appre¬ 
ciate  it  if  any  readers  possessing  copies  of  Vol.  3,  No.  1,  with  which 
they  are  willing  to  part,  would  inform  the  Bulletin. 


★ 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS1  BULLETIN 

620  Michigan  Avenue/  N.E. 
Washington,  D.  C.  20017 


Japanese  and  Formosan  Coleoptera 


Price  list  on  request 


J.  Ohkura 


P.O.  Box  No.  2  Shakujii, 
Nerimaku,  Tokyo,  Japan. 


Now  in  its  38th  year — 

Anthropological  Quarterly 

(formerly  Primitive  Man) 

Issued  January,  April,  July  and  October 

CT'fO 

Some  Recent  Contents: 

Grasshoppers  as  Food  in  Buhaya . P.  O.  Mors 

A  Pygmy  Group  Newly  Discovered  in  New  Guinea.  .Martin  Gusinde 

Eskimo  Reindeer  Herding . Robert  T.  Anderson 

Rock  Paintings  of  South  Africa . Abbe  Henri  Breuil 

The  Assinboin  Horse  Medicine  Cult . John  C.  Ewers 

Treatment  of  Disease  in  the  New  Guinea  Highlands 

Louis  J.  Luzbetak 

( Articles  on  Physical  and  Cultural  Anthropology) 

Subscription  Price  $5.00  a  year  Single  Issues  $1.00 

Anthropological  Quarterly 

620  Michigan  Ave.,  N.E.  Washington,  D.  C.  20017 


VOLUME  20  JUNE  /(No.  2)  1966 

JUL  14  rjoe 

ANOBIIDAE:  N.  gen.,  n.  sp.,  from  Jamaica,  by  White .  60 

DYTISCIDAE:  On  Platydessus  perforatus,  by  Spangler .  57 

LAMPYRIDAE:  New  cryptic  Photinus,  by  Lloyd .  43 

MELOIDAE:  Gnathium  minimum  in  Illinois,  by  Bouseman .  59 

MICROCOLEOPTERA:  Collecting  techniques,  by  Suter .  33 

SCYDMAENIDAE:  On  Plaumanniola,  by  Lawrence  and  Reichardt  39 
STAPHYLINIDAE:  On  Nearctic  Anthophagini,  by  Moore .  47 

Beetle  Talk .  59 

Book  Review  .  64 

Literature  Notice .  38,  42 

Notice  .  58, 64 

THE  CATHOLIC  UNIVERSITY  OF  AMERICA  PRESS 
WASHINGTON,  D.C.  20017 


A  Quarterly  Publication  Devoted 
to  the  Study  of  Beetles 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS’  BULLETIN 

Founded  1947  by  Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr. 

The  Coleopterists’  Bulletin  is  published  by  The  Catholic  University  of  America 
Press,  Washington,  D.  C.  20017  and  edited  by  T.  J.  Spilman.  It  is  issued  four  times  a 
year  beginning  with  March.  All  business  matters  should  be  addressed  to  The  Cole¬ 
opterists’  Bulletin  at  the  Press.  Manuscripts  and  other  editorial  matter  should  be 
addressed  to  the  editor,  U.  S.  National  Museum,  Washington,  D.  C.  20560. 


Subscriptions:  The  subscription  price  for 
each  annual  volume  of  four  numbers  is 
$5.00  payable  in  advance.  All  sub¬ 
scriptions  begin  with  the  first  issue  of 
the  year  and  those  subscribing  later  in 
the  year  will  receive  the  back  issues  of 
the  volume. 


Back  volumes:  A  stock  of  back  volumes 
is  maintained  and  may  be  purchased  as 
follows:  3  to  date,  $5.00  ea.;  single  num¬ 
bers,  $1.25  each;  all  prices  postpaid. 
Missing  numbers:  Issues  lost  in  the  mail 
will  be  supplied  free  of  charge  if  notified 
within  three  months  after  mailing. 


EDITORIAL  BOARD 


Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr.,  Ph.D. 

Department  of  Biology 
Catholic  University  of  America 

O.  L.  Cartwright 

U.  S.  National  Museum 
Washington,  D.  C.  20560 

Eugene  J.  Gerberg,  Ph.D. 

Insect  Control  and  Research,  Inc. 
Baltimore,  Md. 


James  A.  Magner,  Ph.D.,  S.T.D. 

Business  Manager  of  the  Bulletin 
Catholic  University  of  America 

Theodore  J.  Spilman 

U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture 
Washington,  D.  C.  20560 

Eileen  R.  Van  Tassell 

Department  of  Biology 
Catholic  University  of  America 


NOTICE  TO  AUTHORS 


Manuscripts  will  be  considered  ONLY 
FROM  SUBSCRIBERS.  Authors  should 
consult  STYLE  MANUAL  FOR  BIO¬ 
LOGICAL  JOURNALS,  prepared  by  the 
Committee  on  Form  and  Style  of  the  Con¬ 
ference  of  Biological  Editors,  and  pub¬ 
lished  by  the  American  Institute  of  Bio¬ 
logical  Sciences,  2000  P  St.,  N.W.,  Wash¬ 
ington,  D.  C.  20006.  The  Bulletin  requires 
that  all  manuscripts  be  prepared  according 
to  instructions  in  the  Style  Manual.  Illus¬ 
trations  should  fee  sent  mounted,  and 
numbered.  The  manuscript  should  be 
marked  to  indicate  the  location  of  text 
figures  or  the  position  of  full  page  plates. 

Manuscripts  will  be  acknowledged  upon 
receipt.  As  soon  as  possible  thereafter  the 
author  will  be  notified  as  to  acceptance 
after  review  by  the  Editorial  Board.  If 
the  manuscript  is  accepted,  a  tentative 
date  of  publication  will  be  set.  In  general, 


all  papers  will  be  published  in  their  order 
of  receipt,  but  the  editor  reserves  the  right 
to  use  articles  out  of  order  in  the  interest 
of  a  balanced  magazine. 

The  editor  will  make  no  text  changes 
without  advanced  notice  to  the  author. 
Galley  proof  will  be  sent  for  correction. 
These  galleys  are  sent  out  well  in  advance 
and  do  NOT  indicate  the  date  or  order  of 
publication. 

Twenty-five  tear  sheets  of  one  page 
notes  will  be  supplied  free  to  the  author  if 
requested  when  returning  galley  proofs. 
Reprints  of  articles  printed  free  of  extrane¬ 
ous  matter  will  be  supplied  with  or  with¬ 
out  covers  at  cost.  Reprints  MUST  be 
ordered  on  the  form  provided  when  re¬ 
turning  galley  proofs.  The  approximate 
cost  of  reprints  will  be  supplied  with  this 
form. 


EDITORIAL  POLICY 

Any  article,  note,  or  news  items  likely  cases,  descriptions  of  new  species  must  be 
to  be  of  interest  to  readers  of  the  Bulletin  illustrated.  Descriptions  of  new  species  or 
will  be  considered.  Articles  with  illustra-  genera  MUST  contain  keys  or  be  corre- 
tions  are  particularly  desired,  and  in  all  lated  with  existing  keys. 


A  QUARTERLY  PUBLICATION  DEVOTED  TO  THE  STUDY  OF  BEETLES 


The  Coleopterists’  Bulletin 

Volume  20  June  (No.  2)  1966 


TECHNIQUES  FOR  THE  COLLECTION  OF 
MICROCOLEOPTERA  OF  THE  FAMILIES  PSELAPHIDAE, 
PTILIIDAE,  AND  SCYDMAENIDAE 

By  Walter  R.  Suter1 

The  following  account  of  collecting  techniques  employed  on  a  series 
of  field  trips  was  initiated  because  the  data  accumulated  might  make 
future  efforts  more  profitable  by  increasing  efficiency.  In  general,  the  same 
basic  technique  are  almost  equally  effective  for  the  capture  of  repre¬ 
sentatives  of  the  families  Pselaphidae,  Pitliidae,  and  Scydmaenidae;  in  fact, 
the  normal  pattern  of  occurence  of  these  in  essentially  the  same  or 
equivalent  habitats  makes  it  almost  impossible  to  collect  one  of  them 
while  missing  the  other  two.  Few,  if  any,  of  the  methods  in  the  following 
discussion  are  completely  original,  since  my  work  has  relied  heavily 
upon  discussions  and  suggestions  of  many  people,  chief  of  which  have 
been  Professor  Orlando  Park  of  Northwestern  University,  Rupert  Wenzel 
and  Henry  Dybas  of  the  Chicago  Natural  History  Museum,  and  Harrison 
R.  Steeves,  Jr.  of  Birmingham,  Alabama.  To  these  go  my  thanks  for 
making  collection  of  these  microcoleoptera  possible  and  more  profitable. 

Previous  work  in  this  field  by  specialists  has  involved  a  number  of 
techniques.  Some  of  the  more  common  of  these  would  include  hand¬ 
picking  of  various  kinds  of  debris,  especially  under  bark  of  trees,  stones, 
or  boards  on  suitable  habitats;  sifting  material  onto  a  white  sheet  through 
a  screen;  examination  of  the  nests  of  ants  and  termites  (Park,  1929,  1932, 
1949,  1949,  1965) ;  light  trapping;  and  liberal  use  of  the  Berlese  funnel  and 
its  modifications.  Certainly  all  these  methods  have  produced  in  the  past; 
in  fact,  they  are  historically  responsible  for  most  of  the  material  already 
collected  and  described.  Moreover,  although  these  families  are  not  un¬ 
common,  their  representatives  are  small  enough  and  localized  enough  that 
accidental  captures  are  relatively  infrequent.  Even  in  the  past,  most  of 
the  material  on  which  classical  research  was  done  has  been  collected  by 
a  few  workers  who  amassed  impressive  samples  of  material,  usually  from 
restricted  areas.  The  names  of  Schmitt,  Casey,  Brendel,  Ulke,  LeConte, 
Fender,  and  many  others  are  perpetuated  in  species  names  in  these  families 
for  just  this  reason. 

Three  basic  techniques  seem  to  be  important  in  the  collection  of  these 
miniatures  of  the  insect  world,  namely:  selection  of  suitable  material 


1  Biology  Department,  Carthage  College,  Kenosha,  Wisconsin. 


34 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


usually  from  particular  habitats;  concentration  or  examination  of  large 
quantities  of  this  material;  and  use  of  as  many  methods  of  automatic 
extraction  as  possible. 

Unfortunately,  the  first  of  these  prerequisites  has  proven  to  be  the 
most  difficult  to  fulfill,  since  recognition  of  proper  or  at  least  promising 
habitats  usually  comes  only  through  the  slow  acquisition  of  experience, 
often  after  an  exorbitant  expenditure  of  at  least  time  if  not  also  money. 
A  few  generalizations  apply  often  enough,  nevertheless,  to  aid  the  novice 
as  well  as  the  more  experienced  collector.  The  three  families  are  all 
basically  forest  groups,  probably  arising  in  the  not  too  distant  geological 
past  as  members  of  floor  communities  and  radiating  from  these  to  their 
present  distribution  (Park,  1947,  1965).  This  coupled  with  the  fact  that 
they  have  a  relatively  low  vagility  and  are  almost  exclusively  nocturnal 
leads  the  collector  through  an  oft-times  futile  search  for  the  most  stable, 
dark,  humid  habitats  that  could  be  construed  as  forest-like.  The  five 
types  of  communities  which  have  been  most  productive  are  bogs,  forests, 
prairies,  caves,  and  debris  piles,  and  in  almost  all  cases  the  stratum  in¬ 
habited  is  the  floor  or  its  extensions. 

A  bog  can  be  defined  as  an  area  with  little  or  no  drainage,  a  situation 
which  often  leads  to  extensive  development  of  mosses  as  floor  cover.  These 
mosses,  notably  Sphagnales  in  the  northern  United  States,  are  the  most 
important  habitat  for  microcoleoptera  in  these  situations.  The  general 
pattern  of  collecting  usually  employed  has  been  a  systematic  sifting  of 
material  with  manual  collection  from  the  debris  until  an  aggregation  is 
found  which  warrants  the  use  of  the  Berlese  funnel.  The  groups  appear 
to  migrate,  especially  seasonally,  so  that  a  variety  of  situations  may 
have  to  be  tested  to  find  a  suitable  aggregation,  but  once  this  is  accomplished 
the  Berlese  funnel  can  usually  be  used  to  advantage.  In  any  case,  a  few 
species  are  too  minute  for  manual  collection  and  must  be  collected 
automatically.  In  general,  hummocks  of  mosses  will  yield  proportionally 
more  material  than  the  areas  between  them,  except  during  very  dry 
periods;  and  the  smaller  animals,  notably  Bibloplectus  among  the  Pselaphi- 
dae,  may  be  found  most  commonly  in  the  masses  of  fern  rhizomes  laid 
down  by  the  genus  Osmunda.  Occasionally  the  animals  tend  to  extreme 
aggregation,  so  that  poor  yields  in  moss-covered  areas  may  be  supplemented 
by  worth-while  yields  from  isolated  or  peripheral  hummocks.  In  these 
situations  completely  isolated  clumps  of  moss  around  shrub  bases  or 
litter  accumulations  in  bush  forks  often  yield  exceptionally  well,  especially 
in  flooded  situations. 

Work  in  forests  cannot  be  limited  to  such  a  small  number  of  habitats, 
probably  because  the  families  in  question  evolved  in  forest  situations 
and  have  adaptively  radiated  to  a  greater  degree  in  the  greater  length 
of  time  available.  But  a  few  situations  yield  well  enough  to  mention  in 
the  interests  of  efficiency:  tree  holes  and  forks  (Park,  Auerbach,  and 
Corley,  1950;  Park  and  Auerbach,  1954),  log  mold  (especially  that  pro¬ 
tected  by  bark),  ant  nests,  tree  buttress  debris  or  its  equivalent,  and 
moist  pockets  on  the  floor,  especially  those  next  to  rotting  logs  on  slopes. 
Also  the  size  of  the  population  and  the  number  of  species  present  often 
depends  on  the  successional  stage  of  the  major  community;  for  example, 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


35 


in  the  Chicago  area  the  best  yields  of  species  and  individuals  come  from 
pre-climax  oak  or  climax  beech-sugar  maple  forests.  The  collector  should 
be  aware  of  habitat  specificity  even  within  the  general  forest  community. 
In  tree  holes  and  forks,  large  cavities  close  to  the  ground  generally  have 
larger  populations,  and  those  with  a  cover  of  leaves  or  wood  chips  are 
better  than  unprotected  ones.  Tree  forks  generally  do  not  support  a 
large  population  except  for  basal  forks  in  pine  forests  in  the  Gulf  states, 
possibly  because  of  the  paucity  of  tree  holes,  but  axillary  debris  from 
palmetto  yields  exceptionally  well  in  the  south.  Finally,  collection  of 
debris  from  the  floor  should  take  into  account  depth,  protection,  moisture 
supply,  and  any  other  factors  which  would  give  the  greatest  stability 
to  the  habitat.  Some  of  the  most  interesting  collections  have  been  obtained 
from  litter  interlaced  with  fungal  hyphae  under  conifers  or  in  pseudoforks 
(accumulations  between  intertwined  buttresses  of  adjacent  trees)  in  southern 
forests,  and  from  mixtures  of  debris  under  rhododendron  in  the  southern 
Appalachians.  Generally  destructive  flooding  or  burning  eliminates  the 
possibility  of  good  yields,  but  “islands”  in  swamp  situations  often  yield 
exceptionally  well. 

Prairie  species  are  probably  the  least  well  known  for  a  variety  of 
reasons,  some  of  which  may  be  the  apparent  dissimilarity  between  prairie 
and  forest,  the  need  for  different  collecting  techniques,  and  the  rapid 
disappearance  of  natural  prairie  through  the  efforts  of  man.  There  are, 
nevertheless,  a  number  of  species  which  are  restricted  to  this  community 
and  which  are  only  slightly  more  difficult  to  find  than  the  prairies  them¬ 
selves.  In  the  midwestern  United  States  prairie  relicts  can  often  be  found 
by  spotting  a  trio  of  biotic  indicators,  namely:  compass  plant,  rosin 
weed,  and  rattlesnake  master.  Good  yields  have  been  obtained  from 
three  collecting  methods.  First  the  “trapping”  of  beetles  is  done  by 
supplying  a  cover  of  isolated  boards  to  the  floor.  Examination  of  these 
boards,  especially  after  a  spring  fire,  often  gives  good  yields,  but  aestivation 
of  the  populations  may  lead  to  their  apparent  absence  during  the  summer. 
Ant  nests  also  yield  some  species  and  Berlese  extraction  from  floor 
clumps,  piles  of  grasses,  or  debris  often  gives  good  results  (Park,  Auer¬ 
bach,  and  Wilson,  1949,  1953). 

Caves  offer  a  rather  restricted  group  of  Pselaphidae  which  are  especially 
important  in  a  study  of  speciation  (Park,  1951),  but  the  other  two 
families  are  either  uncommon  or  absent.  In  these  interesting  situations 
the  majority  of  animals  will  be  found  under  rocks  near  the  entrance,  but 
at  least  one  genus  has  retreated  out  of  this  twilight  zone  to  the  darkness 
of  the  interior.  Small  limestone  caves  with  small  openings,  dampness  but 
no  stream  seem  to  yield  best.  In  the  United  States,  the  vast  majority  of 
records  have  come  from  older  caves  in  the  southern  Appalachians  and  its 
extensions  into  Alabama  and  Tennessee. 

The  search  for  microcoleoptera  has  so  far  been  channeled  to  natural, 
stable  communities,  but  one  group  of  unnatural  habitats  yield  some  species 
in  good  number.  The  yield  in  these  situations  is  enhanced  by  a  surrounding 
natural  area,  but  these  microseres  attain  enough  stability  of  their  own 
with  time  to  support  flourishing  populations.  These  are  basically  piles  of 
debris,  and  yield  increases  with  size  and  age,  although  aggregations  of  some 


36 


THE  COLEOPTER1STS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


species  in  larger  piles  may  make  finding  them  more  difficult,  and  extreme 
age  leads  to  the  disappearance  of  the  pile.  Three  major  types  are  im¬ 
portant,  namely:  accumulations  of  grasses,  sawdust  piles,  and  piles  of 
horse  manure  (Wagner,  1962).  The  last  of  these  might  at  first  glance 
seem  the  least  likely  to  produce  because  of  the  origins  and  habits  of  the 
families,  but  a  few  species  have  successfully  adapted  to  this  habitat  and 
in  many  cases  attained  a  nearly  world-wide  distribution,  possibly  because 
of  a  lack  of  serious  competition.  Grass  accumulations  take  the  form 
of  compost  heaps,  hay  stacks,  and  grass  cuttings  on  the  periphery  of 
natural  communities,  especially  swamps.  So  Ions  as  moisture  is  retained 
and  temperature  extremes  are  avoided  yields  may  be  surprising.  Finally, 
sawdust  piles  often  prove  to  be  a  mecca  to  the  microcoleopterologist,  with 
the  majority  of  species  therein  apparently  adapted  to  life  in  buttresses 
or  subcortical  log  mold  of  forests.  The  Berlese  funnel  should  always 
be  used  if  the  sawdust  is  over  ten  years  old  because  of  the  small  size  of 
many  of  the  species.  Piles  of  leaves  or  bark  chips  on  the  sawdust  may 
be  especially  rich,  but  interesting  yields  of  larger  forms  come  from  under 
slabs  of  wood  laying  on  the  sawdust  or  buried  in  it.  Concentrations  of 
Coleoptera  seem  to  occur  near  the  periphery  of  the  piles,  which  may  be 
a  consequence  of  heat  accumulation  nearer  the  center  or  a  reflection  of 
aggregation  and  thinness  of  the  pile  near  its  edge,  but  which  is  enhanced 
by  encroachment  of  natural  vegetation  (and  protection).  These  three 
types  have  yielded  well  in  the  past,  but  there  are  many  similar  situations 
which  yield  on  occasion,  so  that  it  might  pay  to  watch  for  suitably  aged 
and  protected  debris  piles  in  general. 

One  distressing  fact  of  the  distribution  of  these  microcoleoptera  has 
been  recently  discussed  by  Dybas  (1966).  The  small  size  of  the  animals 
reduces  their  fecundity  directly  by  limiting  the  number  of  eggs  carried 
by  the  female.  This  affects  collecting  because  the  animals  cannot  breed 
fast  enough  to  “fill”  an  extensive  forest,  leading  to  the  anomalous  situation 
of  small  stands  yielding  better  than  extensive  ones.  And  situations  of 
restricted  size  may  arrise  naturally  in  “tension  areas”  such  as  the  Chicago 
area  where  forest,  bog,  and  prairie  interdigitate,  or  Highlands  County, 
Florida,  where  the  one  hundred  foot  plateau  drops  off  into  cypress  and 
magnolia  swamps,  giving  maximum  variability  and  with  it  maximum 
collecting  efficiency. 

With  the  exception  of  the  Ptiliidae,  most  microcoleoptera  are  not 
common,  although  few  are  truly  rare.  The  collector  who  does  not  need 
exact  quantitative  data,  therefore,  should  attempt  to  concentrate  his 
samples  to  obtain  both  large  numbers  of  species  and,  more  important, 
large  series  of  most  of  the  species.  For  work  with  light  traps  this  involves 
simply  the  enclosure  of  the  apparatus  in  a  screen  with  openings  of  one-half 
inch  or  smaller  so  larger  flying  insects,  notably  Lepidoptera,  do  not 
clutter  the  collections.  In  this  case  the  importance  of  the  concentration 
lies  with  the  sorting,  which  becomes  infinitely  easier.  Dybas  has  also 
used  a  very  fine  mesh  net  to  advantage  for  collecting  which  might  be 
considered  a  method  of  light  trapping.  This  is  mounted  on  a  regulation 
hoop  and  handle  from  an  insect  net  and  held  out  the  side  of  a  slowly 
moving  car  while  driving  at  dusk  in  forested  areas  with  the  lights  on 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


37 


bright.  Yields  from  this  system  depend  on  the  same  physical  conditions 
as  does  light  trapping,  with  highest  yields  on  warm,  humid  nights.  Floatation 
of  organic  material  in  water  with  subsequent  drying  and  Berlesing  has 
also  been  suggested,  but  1  have  done  little  of  this.  My  most  effective 
method  was  shaking  down  litter  with  a  riddle  or  other  mounted  screen 
followed  by  Berlese  extraction.  This  increases  the  floor  area  sampled 
by  eliminating  material  which  had  not  aged  enough  to  provide  habitats 
for  microcoleoptera  and  breaks  up  some  materials  from  which  they 
could  not  otherwise  be  dislodged.  This  system  has  only  limited  applicability 
when  dealing  with  prairie  sod,  tree  hole  mold,  manure,  and  sawdust,  but 
it  becomes  especially  important  in  concentrating  leaf  litter,  subcortical 
log  mold,  and  straw  piles,  and  the  riddle  alone  is  grossly  effective  when 
used  on  mosses  in  swamps  and  bogs. 

Generally,  methods  other  than  automatic  can  only  be  justified  as  a 
means  of  testing  habitats  for  possible  subsequent  treatment  with  Berlese 
funnels.  One  type  of  this  apparatus  is  diagrammed  in  Peterson  (1964, 
164:  1,  2,  and  3),  but  my  funnel  utilizes  a  single  slope,  detachable 
brackets,  quarter-inch  mesh  screens  supplemented  with  cheesecloth,  and 
simple  wire  harnesses  developed  by  Mr.  Steeves  for  bottle  attachment. 
For  maximum  (but  non-quantitative)  yields  100  watt  bulbs  are  used 
and  the  funnels  allowed  to  run  for  only  six  to  ten  hours,  depending  upon 
the  water  content  of  the  sample,  since  tests  indicated  that  microcoleoptera 
react  immediately  to  heat  even  though  the  majority  of  soil  arthropods 
are  vagile  or  resistant  enough  to  be  dislodged  only  by  the  slower  drying 
of  the  samples.  Using  this  timing,  which  allows  for  three  batches  of  litter 
a  day,  and  running  banks  of  ten  to  twenty  funnels  hundreds  of  localities 
and  thousands  of  habitats  can  be  run  through  in  a  year’s  time. 

In  any  case,  expect  to  be  surprised  both  favorably  and  unfavorably  in 
your  collecting  efforts  directed  to  microcoleoptera.  The  methods  outlined 
herein  have  been  used  to  collect  as  many  as  a  thousand  or  more  a  day 
under  favorable  conditions,  and  as  few  as  two  or  three  a  day  in  unfavorable 
ones,  but  the  lesson  to  be  learned  from  the  efforts  expended  is  some  idea 
of  the  basic  ecology  of  these  animals.  The  more  information  you  derive 
from  your  successes  and  failures  about  the  habitats  and  habits  of  these 
animals,  the  easier  it  will  be  to  find  them  in  the  future. 


Literature  Cited 


Dybas,  h.  s. 

1966.  Evidence  for  parthenogenesis  in  the  featherwing  beetles,  with  a  taxo¬ 
nomic  review  of  a  new  genus  and  six  new  species.  Fieldiana,  Zool. 
(IN  PRESS). 

Park,  O. 

1929.  Ecological  observations  upon  the  myrmecocoles  of  Formica  ulkei 
Emery,  especially  Leptinus  testaceus  Mueller.  Psyche  36:195-215. 


1932.  The  myrmecocoles  of  Lasius  umbratus  mixtus  aphidicola  Walsh.  Ann. 
Ent.  Soc.  Amer.  25:77-88. 


38 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


1947.  The  pselaphid  at  home  and  abroad.  Scientific  Monthly  65:27-42. 


1949a.  The  genus  Connodontus  (Coleoptera:  Pselaphidae).  Bull.  Chicago 
Acad.  Sci.  8:251-265. 


1949b.  New  species  of  Nearctic  pselaphid  beetles  and  a  revision  of  the  genus 
Cedius.  Bull.  Chicago  Acad.  Sci.  8:315-343. 


1951.  Cavernicolous  pselaphid  beetles  of  Alabama  and  Tennessee,  with  obser¬ 
vations  on  the  taxonomy  of  the  family.  Geol.  Survey  of  Alabama, 
Museum  Paper  3 1 : 1-107. 


1965.  Revision  of  the  genus  Batriasymmodes  (Coleoptera:  Pselaphidae). 
Trans.  Amer.  Micros.  Soc.  84:184-201. 

Park,  O.  and  S.  Auerbach 

1954.  Further  study  of  the  tree-hole  complex  with  emphasis  on  quantitative 
aspects  of  the  fauna.  Ecology  35:208-222. 

Park,  O.,  S.  Auerbach,  and  G.  Corley 

1950.  The  tree-hole  habitat  with  emphasis  on  the  pselaphid  beetle  fauna. 
Bull.  Chicago  Acad.  Sci.  9: 19-57. 

Park,  O.,  S.  Auerbach,  and  M.  Wilson 

1949.  Pselaphid  beetles  of  an  Illinois  prairie:  the  fauna,  and  its  relationship 
to  the  Prairie  Peninsula  Hypothesis.  Bull.  Chicago  Acad.  Sci.  8:267-276. 


1953.  Pselaphid  beetles  of  an  Illinois  prairie:  the  population.  Ecol.  Monog. 
23:1-15. 

Peterson,  A. 

1964.  Entomological  Techniques.  Ann  Arbor:  Edwards  Brothers. 

Wagner,  J.  A. 

1962.  The  biology  of  the  Euplectus  complex:  Pselaphidae:  Coleoptera,  includ¬ 
ing  generic  revisions  of  nearctic  species  north  of  Mexico.  Evanston 
(Ill.),  Ph.D.  Dissertation,  Northwestern  University  (unpublished). 


LITERATURE  NOTICE 

STUDIES  ON  THE  BEETLES  LEPTINILLUS  VALIDUS  (HORN)  AND 
PLATYPSYLLUS  CASTORS  RITSEMA  (COLEOPTERA:  LEPINIDAE) 
FROM  BEAVER.  By  D.  M.  Wood.  Proc.  Ent.  Soc.  Ontario  1964  [1965]  95:33-63, 
35  figs.  1965. — The  egg,  larva,  and  pupa  of  both  species  and  the  adult  of  the 
first  species  are  described  and  illustrated.  Life  histories,  including  host  relationships, 
activities,  food  getting,  temperature  requirements,  laboratory  rearing,  mating,  and 
egg  laying,  are  described  and  discussed.  These  ectoparasitic  beetles  are  fascinating, 
and  so  is  this  study. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


39 


THE  SYSTEMATIC  POSITION  OF  PLAUMANNIOLA 
COSTA  LIMA  (COLEOPTERA:  SCYDMAENIDAE) 

By  John  F.  Lawrence1 
and  Hans  Reichardt2-3 

The  genus  Plaumanniola  was  proposed  for  the  Brazilian  species  P. 
sanctaecatharinae  and  was  made  the  type  of  a  distinct  subfamily  of  Ptinidae, 
the  Plaumanniolinae  (Costa  Lima,  1962).  Because  of  the  peculiar  struc¬ 
ture  of  the  head  and  antennae,  it  was  assumed  that  the  beetle  lives  with 
ants,  and  several  references  were  made  in  the  description  to  the  similarities 
between  this  species  and  the  Australian  myrmecophile  Ectrephes  calvatus 
Mjoberg.  In  connection  with  the  preparation  of  a  forthcoming  paper 
on  myrmecophilous  Ptinidae,  the  authors  had  the  opportunity  of  obtaining 
for  study  a  male  paratype  of  Plaumanniola  sanctaecatharinae.  A  careful 
examination  of  the  specimen  confirmed  our  suspicions  that  the  species 
is  not  a  ptinid  at  all,  but  rather  belongs  to  the  family  Scydmaenidae. 

The  following  characters  of  Plaumanniola  clearly  indicate  its  inclusion 
within  the  Scydmaenidae:  1)  3rd  segment  of  maxillary  palp  enlarged, 
the  terminal  segment  small,  acuminate,  and  partly  buried  in  the  apex 
of  the  3rd  (fig.  1).  2)  Procoxal  cavities  open  behind,  the  coxae  conical 
and  projecting,  contiguous,  and  the  trochantins  hidden.  3)  Mesepisternum 
elevated  above  the  plane  of  the  metasternum.  4)  Metacoxae  well 
separated  but  not  distant.  5)  Hindwing  with  reduced  venation,  the  anal 
lobe  (Forbes,  1926)  and  the  medio-cubital  loop  (Crowson,  1955) 
absent.  6)  Abdomen  with  6  freely-articulated  visible  sternites;  tergites 
completely  covered  by  elytra,  the  first  4  membranous  and  the  last  2 
sclerotized.  7)  Aedeagus  similar  to  Stenichnus  collaris  Mull.  (Sharp 
and  Muir,  1912:508,  fig.  56)  with  a  short,  thick  median  lobe,  which 
is  curved  ventrad  at  the  base  to  form  a  narrow,  flat  process,  narrow 
lateral  lobes  attached  dorsally,  and  a  complex  internal  sac  bearing 
sclerotized  plates. 

The  wing  venation  is  undoubtedly  staphylinoid  (Crowson,  1955:12, 
fig.  6)  with  the  medio-cubital  loop  entirely  absent.  Within  the  Staphy- 
linoidea,  the  Pselaphidae  and  Staphylinidae  never  have  more  than  2 
tergites  membranous,  while  the  Leptinidae  and  Anisotomidae  lack  the 
procoxal  characters.  The  hidden  trochantins  and  the  structure  of  the 
abdomen  separate  Plaumanniola  from  the  Silphidae  and  Scaphidiidae. 
The  raised  mesepisternum  and  the  structure  of  the  maxillary  palp  appear 
to  be  found  only  in  the  Scydmaenidae.  The  general  structure  of  the 
aedeagus  is  not  uncommon  among  staphylinoids,  but  the  dorsal  articulation 
of  the  lateral  lobes  is  unique  to  the  Scydmaenidae. 


1  Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology,  Harvard  University,  Cambridge,  Mass. 

2  Departamento  de  Zoologia,  Secretaria  da  Agricultura,  Sab  Paulo,  Brazil;  presently 
at  Harvard  University. 

•^Acknowledgements.  We  gratefully  acknowledge  the  assistance  of  M.  A.  Vulcano, 
Departamento  de  Zoologia,  Sab  Paulo,  Brazil,  for  the  loan  of  the  paratype  specimen. 
(This  specimen  was  bought  by  Hans  Reichardt  from  Fritz  Plaumann  and  deposited 
in  the  collection  at  Sab  Paulo.) 


40 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


Aside  from  the  peculiar  structure  of  the  head  and  pronotum,  both 
of  which  are  broad  and  flattened,  the  most  aberrant  character  of  Plau- 
manniola  is  the  structure  of  the  antenna,  which  is  enlarged  apically 
forming  a  5-segmented  club  (fig.  2).  Even  this,  however,  is  not  without 
precedent  among  the  Scydmaenidae.  Crowson  (1955:37)  mentions  that 
Cephennium  and  its  allies  have  a  distinctly  anisotomid-like  club,  while 
several  scydmaenids  figured  by  Schaufuss  (1866),  Sharp  (1897),  and 
Reitter  (1909)  have  the  last  2  to  5  antennal  segments  variously  enlarged. 
The  sensory  vesicles  present  in  the  antenna  of  Eutheia  (Crowson,  1955:30, 
37,  fig.  30)  could  not  be  seen  in  the  specimen  of  Plaumanniola. 

The  position  of  the  genus  within  the  Scydmaenidae  is  somewhat  more 
difficult  to  ascertain,  since  the  family  is  badly  in  need  of  revision.  Accord¬ 
ing  to  the  characters  used  by  Casey  (1897),  Arnett  (1961),  and  Marsh 
(1962),  for  the  North  American  fauna,  Plaumanniola  may  be  tentatively 
placed  near  the  tribe  Euconnini,  sharing  with  its  members  the  following 
characters:  1)  4th  segment  of  maxillary  palp  acuminate.  2)  Antennal 
insertions  fairly  widely  separated.  3)  Neck  short  and  abruptly  con- 


Figures  1-2,  Plaumanniola  sanctaecatharinae  Costa  Lima.  1 — Last  3  segments  of 
maxillary  palp.  2 — Antenna. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


41 


strictcd.  4)  Eyes  placed  slightly  anterad  of  middle  of  head.  5)  Proster- 
nLim  deeply  emarginate  before  the  coxae.  6)  Mesosternum  distinctly 
carinate.  7)  Hind  coxae  distinctly  separated,  transverse,  attaining  the 
sides  of  the  body.  8)  Scutellum  not  visible. 

The  tribe  Euconnini  is  fairly  well  represented  in  the  Neotropical  region, 
with  the  majority  of  species,  according  to  Blackwelder  (1944),  belonging 
to  the  genus  Euconnus.  Because  of  the  specialized  character  of  Plauman- 
niola  and  the  uncertain  nature  of  the  present  scydmaenid  classification, 
we  think  that  the  genus  should  remain  in  a  separate  tribe  of  the  Scydmaeni- 
nae,  the  Plaumanniolini,  which  might  be  placed  near  the  Euconnini  and 
the  Scydmaenini.  A  more  detailed  treatment  of  the  generic  relationships 
must  await  a  thorough  revision  of  the  family. 

The  supposition  that  Plaumanniola  sanctaecatharinae  may  be  myrme- 
cophilous  is  not  supported  by  evidence  at  present,  since  Costa  Lima’s 
specimens  were  collected  by  Fritz  Plaumann  among  dry  leaves  on  the 
forest  floor.  It  is  not  improbable,  however,  that  the  species  lives  in 
association  with  ants,  since  myrmecophily  appears  to  be  fairly  common 
among  the  Scydmaenidae.  Wasmann  (1894)  lists  32  species  of  scydmae- 
nids  which  have  been  collected  with  various  ant  species.  It  is  hoped 
that  a  further  investigation  of  this  remarkable  species  will  shed  light 
both  on  its  taxonomic  relationships  and  on  its  habits. 


Literature  Cited 


Arnett,  R.  H. 

1961.  The  Beetles  of  the  United  States.  Part  II.  Fasc.  23.  Catholic  Univ.  Amer. 
Press,  Washington,  D.C.,  pp.  357-362,  1  fig. 

Bl  ACKWELDER,  R.  E. 

1944.  Checklist  of  the  coleopterous  insects  of  Mexico,  Central  America,  the 
West  Indies,  and  South  America.  Bull.  U.  S.  Nat.  Mus.  185,  xii  4-  188  pp. 

Casey,  T.  L. 

1897.  Coleopterological  notices.  VII.  Ann.  New  York  Acad.  Sci.  9:285-684. 
Costa  Lima,  A.  da 

1962.  Micro-coleoptero  representante  da  nova  subfamilia  Plaumanniolinae 
(Col.,  Ptinidae).  Rev.  Brasil.  Biol.  22(4) : 4 1 3-4 1 8,  4  figs. 

Crowson,  R.  A. 

1955.  The  Natural  Classification  of  the  Families  of  Coleoptera.  N.  Lloyd, 
London.  187  pp.,  212  figs. 

Forbes,  W.  T.  M. 

1926.  The  wing  folding  patterns  of  the  Coleoptera.  Jour.  New  York  Ent.  Soc. 
34:42-68,  91-139,  pis.  7-18. 

Marsh,  G.  A. 

1957.  Family  Scydmaenidae.  In  Melville  H.  Hatch,  The  Beetles  of  the  Pacific 
Northwest.  Part  II.  Staphyliniformia.  Univ.  Wash.  Publ.  Biol.  16,  ix  + 
348  pp.,  37  pis.  (pp.  271-280,  pi.  36,  figs.  3-7). 

Reitter,  E. 

1909.  Fauna  Germanica.  Die  Kafer  des  deutschen  Reiches.  Band  II.  Lutz, 
Stuttgart.  392  pp.,  pis.  41-80. 


42 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


SCHAUFUSS,  L.  W. 

1866.  Monographic  der  Scydmaeniden  Central-  und  Siidamerika’s  Verh.  Kaisl. 
Leop. -Carol,  deut.  Akad.  Naturforsch.  33(6).  103  pp.,  4  pis. 

Sharp,  D. 

1897.  Fam.  Scydmaenidae.  In  F.  D.  Godman  and  O.  Salvin,  edit.  Biologia 
Centrali-Americana.  Insecta.  Coleoptera.  Vol  2,  Part  1  (1897-1905). 
Godman  and  Salvin,  London,  xii  +  717  pp.,  19  pis.  (pp.  46-71,  pi.  2). 

Sharp,  D.  and  F.  Muir 

1912.  The  comparative  anatomy  of  the  male  genital  tube  in  Coleoptera.  Trans. 
Ent.  Soc.  London  1912:  477-642,  pis.  42-78. 

Wasmann,  E. 

1894.  Kritisches  Verzeichniss  der  myrmekophilen  und  termitophilen  Arthropo- 
den.  F.  L.  Dames,  Berlin,  xiii  +  231  pp. 


LITERATURE  NOTICE 

A  CASE  OF  MULLERIAN  MIMICRY  OF  SOUND.  By  C.  Lane  and  M.  Roths¬ 
child.  Proc.  Ent.  Soc.  London  (A)  40 (10-12) :  156-158,  4  pis.  1965. — Stridulation 
and  behaviour  displayed  by  Necrophorus  investigator  (Silphidae)  is  described  and 
compared  with  that  exhibited  by  the  bumble  bee  when  disturbed  in  a  semi-torpid 
state.  It  is  suggested  that  this  display  of  mimicry  by  the  beetle  is  directed  against 
crepuscular  ground  predators  as  well  as  birds.  A  short  but  very  interesting  paper. 

THE  TYPES  OF  ADAPTATIONS  OF  LEGS’  STRUCTURE  OF  DESERT 
DARKLING  BEETLES  (COLEOPTERA,  TENEBRIONIDAE.  [In  Russian.]  By 
G.  S.  Medvedev.  Ent.  Obozr.  44(4) : 803-826,  29  figs.  1965. — Another  article  by 
Medvedev  on  morphological  adaptations  of  tenebrionids.  He  had  previously  written 
on  the  mouthparts. 

ESTUDIO  MORFOLOGICO  DE  DOS  COLEOPTEROS  ACUATICOS  CHI- 
LENOS:  RHANTHUS  SIGNATUS  ( D  YTISCIDAE )  Y  TROPISTERNUS 
SETIGER  (HYDROPHILIDAE).  By  M.  Etcheverry  and  W.  Brunner.  Publ.  Centro. 
Est.  Ent.  (Santiago  de  Chile)  No.  7:1-28,  68  figs.  1965. — The  text  contains  general 
information  on  the  habits  of  both  families,  a  list  of  Chilean  species  of  both  families, 
and  only  two  pages  of  morphological  descriptions  of  the  two  species.  Most  of  the 
article  is  made  up  of  illustrations. 

MORE  NEW  GALERUCINE  BEETLES  WITH  EXCISED  MIDDLE  TIBIAE 
IN  THE  MALE  and  A  REVIEW  OF  THE  BEETLES  OF  THE  GENUS  NEOBRO- 
TICA  AND  SOME  CLOSELY  RELATED  GENERA.  By  D.  H.  Blake.  Proc.  U.  S. 
Nat.  Mus.  118:233-266,  35  figs.,  and  267-372,  104  figs.,  respectively.  1966. — A  key 
to  genera  treated  in  each  paper,  a  key  to  the  North  and  Central  American  species 
of  Neobrotica  in  the  second,  and  descriptions  and  illustrations  of  both  new  and  old 
species  make  up  these  two  papers. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


43 


TWO  CRYPTIC  NEW  FIREFLY  SPECIES  IN  THE  GENUS 
PHOTINUS  (COLEOPTERA:  LAMPYRIDAE) 

By  James  E.  Lloyd12-1 * 3 


Studies  on  the  mating  behavior  of  Photinus  fireflies  have  resolved  each 
of  three  familiar  species  into  a  cryptic  species-pair.  For  each  pair  one  sibling 
le quires  formal  characterization  and  a  name.  Two  of  the  necessary  de¬ 
scriptions  are  furnished  here;  description  of  the  third  species  is  deferred 
until  critical  observations  can  be  made. 

Photinus  macdermotti  Lloyd,  NEW  SPECIES 

DIAGNOSIS:  This  species  has  previously  been  confused  with  Photinus 
consanguineus  LeConte.  Male  flash  pattern  with  two  flashes  approximatelv 
two  seconds  apart  (versus  two  flashes  one-half  second  apart  in  con¬ 
sanguineus ).  Procoxae  with  anterior  surfaces  fuscous  or  piceous  (versus 
pale  in  consanguineus).  Mesocoxae  with  anterior  surfaces  fuscous  or 
piceous  without  pale  areas  (versus  pale  or  with  pale  areas  in  consanguin¬ 
eus) .  Less  constant  characters  are  1)  the  coloration  of  the  anterior  sur¬ 
faces  of  the  metafemora,  completely  or  nearly  completely  dark  in  mac¬ 
dermotti  and  bicolored  in  consanguineus,  and  2)  the  frequent  presence 
of  a  median  longitudinal  pronotal  sulcus  in  macdermotti  (versus  a  median 
carinula  in  consanguineus).  Specimens  of  macdermotti  collected  in  Gaines¬ 
ville,  Florida,  are,  on  the  average,  1.3  mm.  shorter  than  those  of  con¬ 
sanguineus  from  Gainesville. 

HOL°TYPE:  Male.  Form  as  in  figure  1.  Length  9.0  mm.  Eyes  large,  separated 
medially  above  by  less  than  diameter  of  eye.  Pronotum  with  median  longitudinal 
sulcus,  with  median  piceous  brown  vitta  about  .27  of  width  of  pronotum  and  attain¬ 
ing  base  but  not  apex,  diffusely  entering  anterior  coarsely  punctate  area;  rectangular 
area  each  side  of  vitta  rosy.  Scutellum  piceous  black.  Mesonotal  areas  black.  Elytra 
piceous  black;  sutural  bead  flavate,  continuously  around  apex,  wider  than  explanate 
margin.  Procoxae  with  anterior  surfaces  fuscous.  Mesocoxae  with  anterior  surfaces 
piceous  brown.  Metafemora  with  anterior  surfaces  concolorous,  piceous  brown 
Ventral  abdominal  segments  2-5  piceous  brown,  6  and  7  yellow  and  luminous,  8 
translucent,  9  fuscous.  Pygidium  brown  and  truncate.  Aedeagus  as  in  consanguineus 
(see  Green,  1956).  Flash  pattern  composed  of  two  short  flashes  approximately  two 
seconds  apart;  repeated  every  four  to  seven  seconds  of  flight. 

TYPE  LOCALITY:  Gainesville,  Alachua  County,  Florida,  12  May, 
1964,  J.  E.  Lloyd.  Mesophytic  woods.  Attracted  to  a  flashlight  flashed  in 
a  manner  to  simulate  the  female  flash-response.  Deposited  in  the  collection 
at  Cornell  University. 

VARIATION :  Length  8.0-10.5  mm.  Width  of  pale  elytral  border  varies  from 
barely  wider  to  much  wider  than  explanate  margin.  Anterior  surfaces  of  procoxae 


1  Department  of  Entomology,  Cornell  University,  Ithaca,  New  York. 

-  This  investigation  was  supported  by  U.  S.  Public  Health  Service  Predoctoral 
Fellowship  No.  1-F1-GM-22, 196-01,  the  Sigma  Xi-RESA  research  fund,  and  the 
Bache  Fund,  Grant  No.  481. 

3 1  thank  Dr.  William  L.  Brown  of  Cornell  University  for  his  helpful  comments 
and  criticisms  of  the  manuscript. 


44 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


sometimes  piceous  brown.  Anterior  surfaces  of  metafemora  occasionally  bicolored. 
Pronotal  median  longitudinal  sulcus  occasionally  absent  and  rarely  a  carinula  is 
present. 

FEMALES:  Length  7. 5-9.0  mm.  Alate,  similar  to  males  in  form  and  coloration.  Eyes 
small,  separated  medially  above  by  more  than  diameter  of  eye.  Ventral  abdominal 
segment  6  yellow  and  luminous  in  median  third  of  width,  pale  each  side;  segments 
2-5,  7  and  8  piceous  brown.  Pygidium  brown  and  narrowly  rounded.  Female  flash- 
response  a  single  short  flash  emitted  about  one  and  one-half  seconds  after  the  be¬ 
ginning  of  the  second  pulse  of  the  male  flash  pattern. 

DISTRIBUTION:  P.  macdermotti  was  observed  and  behavior  voucher 
specimens  collected  during  May  1964  and  April  and  May  1965  at  Gaines¬ 
ville,  Florida  (Holotype,  61  males,  9  females),  and  June  1963  and  1964 
at  Pisgah  Mountain,  North  Carolina  (3  males,  3  females). 

NOTES:  This  species  is  named  in  honor  of  Mr.  Frank  A.  McDermott 
of  Wilmington,  Delaware. 

P.  consanguineus  was  observed  and  behavior  voucher  specimens  col¬ 
lected  during  May  1964  and  April  and  May  1965  at  Gainesville,  Florida 
(48  males,  4  females),  June  1963  at  Fife,  Goochland  County,  Virginia  (5 
males,  4  females),  and  May  1965  at  Otter  Creek,  Levy  County,  Florida 
(2  males). 

The  morphological  characters  given  to  distinguish  macdermotti  from 
consanguineus  permit  correct  identification  of  over  95  percent  of  the 
voucher  specimens  of  both  species  collected  at  Gainesville,  Florida. 

There  apparently  is  no  type  of  consanguineus.  The  LeConte  Collection 
(Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology)  contains  several  specimens  of  this 
species,  and  only  the  first  specimen  bears  LeConte’s  determination  label. 
I  have  labeled  this  specimen  “nomenifer  P.  consanguineus”  in  order  to 
avoid  freezing  a  type  selection  among  specimens  possibly  not  of  LeConte’s 
type  series.  In  any  case,  the  series  in  the  LeConte  Collection  at  Ftarvard 
is  mixed  (see  Green).  The  nomenifer  measures  12.0  mm.  Pronotal  carinula 
present.  Pro-  and  mesocoxae  pale.  Metafemora  bicolored,  although  not 
markedly  so.  Locality  W.  Va.  (West  Virginia). 

Photinus  tanytoxus  Lloyd,  NEW  SPECIES 

DIAGNOSIS:  This  species  has  previously  been  confused  with  Photinus 
collustrans  LeConte.  Male  flash  pattern  a  single  flash  approximately  one- 
half  second  long  (versus  one-quarter  second  in  collustrans).  Flying  and 
flashing  period  of  males  beginning  after  40  minutes  past  sunset  (versus 
beginning  about  15  minutes  past  sunset  and  ending  by  45  minutes  after 
sunset  in  collustrans) .  Apical  one-third  to  one-half  of  elytral  sutural  bead 
black  (versus  elytral  sutural  bead  fulvous  throughout  in  collustrans),  (see 
fig.  3). 

HOLOTYPE:  Male.  Form  as  in  fig  2.  Length  8.0  mm.  Eyes  large,  separated 
medially  above  by  less  than  diameter  of  eye.  Pronotum  slightly  wider  than  long, 
broadly  rounded  in  front;  disk  rufous,  with  deeply  impressed  longitudinal  sulcus; 
anterior  punctate  area  piceous  black,  diffusely  so  anteriorly.  Scutellum  and  mesonotal 
areas  fulvous  and  rufous  respectively.  Elytra  piceous  black;  basal  one-half  of  sutural 
bead  fulvous,  apical  one-half  black,  continuously  around  apex;  narrow  explanate 
margin  flavous,  becoming  fuscous  apically.  Each  elytron  tapering  posteriorly  with 
lateral  and  sutural  margins  feebly  converging  to  near  apex.  Ventral  abdominal  seg- 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


45 


n«e?tS  o'*  pic,eous  black,  6  and  7  yellow  and  luminous,  8  translucent  with  white 
spots,  9  translucent;  pygidium  black,  apex  bisinuately  subtruncate.  Aedeagus  as  in 
collustrans  (see  Green).  Flash  pattern  a  single  long  flash  about  one-half  second  in 
duration;  emitted  every  two  to  four  seconds  of  flight. 


n  ^  LOCALITY.-  Route  26,  3.7  miles  west  of  Gainesville,  Alachua 
County  Florida,  24  May,  1964,  J.  E.  Lloyd.  Pasture,  probably  originally 
a  xerophytic  hammock.  Attracted  to  a  female  caged  in  a  glass  container. 
Deposited  in  the  collection  at  Cornell  University. 


TIC!N:  LenSjh  7.0-9. 5  mm.  Piceous  pronotal  coloration  frequently  extends 
posteriorly  along  midline  (see  fig.  3).  Color  of  elytral  apical  margin  frequently 

half  nf 'i  0Ttu0nf  °f  elyf2  SLltural  bead  colored  black  varies  from  one-third  to  one^ 
Halt  of  length  of  sutural  bead. 

]^]Mt^ES'  cLength  CO’11-0  mm.  Dissimilar,  elongate,  brachypterous,  of  soft 
Prnnnt  7  UrJ'  ,Etyes,  small,  separated  medially  above  by  more  than  diameter  of  eye. 
Pronotal  and  elytral  coloration  as  in  males  except  elytral  sutural  bead  usually  entirely 
black,  continuously  around  apex,  occasionally  basal  one-fourth  fulvous.  Ventral  ab- 
dommal  segment  6  luminous  in  median  third  of  width.  Other  abdominal  segments, 
both  dorsal  and  ventral,  fulvous,  rosy  laterally.  Female  flash-response  a  single  long 

be^inniif^o^ma^e^ash011^  m  duration  and  emitted  approximately  one  second  after 


DISTRIBUTION.  P.  tanytoxus  was  observed  and  behavior  voucher 
specimens  collected  during  May  1964  and  April  and  May  1965  at  Gaines¬ 
ville,  Florida  (33  males,  1  female),  and  3.7  miles  west  of  Gainesville  on 
route  26  (Holotype,  64  males,  25  females). 


Figures  1-3,  Photinus  spp.  1 — Form  of  macdermotti  n.  sp.  2 — Form  of  tanytoxus 
n.  sp.  3— Composite  drawing;  pronotum  showing  dark  coloration  extending  posteriorly 
along  midline  as  found  in  some  individuals  of  tanytoxus  n.  sp.  and  collustrans 
LeConte;  left  elytron  with  sutural  bead  as  in  tanytoxus,  right  elytron  with  sutural 
bead  as  in  collustrans. 


46 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


NOTES:  This  species  is  named  for  the  appearance  of  the  flight  path  of 
flashing  males — a  long  arc. 

P.  collustrans  was  observed  and  behavior  voucher  specimens  collected 
during  May  1964  and  April  and  May  1965  at  Gainesville,  Florida  (42 
males,  12  females),  May  1964  and  1965  at  Highlands  Hammock  State 
Park,  Highlands  County,  Florida  (21  males),  May  1965  on  route  26,  10 
miles  west  of  Gainesville  (19  males),  and  14  May,  1965  at  the  collustrans 
type  locality,  Enterprise,  Volusia  County,  Florida  (21  males). 

The  morphological  character  given  to  distinguish  tanytoxus  males  from 
those  of  collustrans  permits  the  correct  identification  of  over  95  percent 
of  the  voucher  specimens  of  both  species. 

The  type  of  collustrans,  in  the  LeConte  Collection  at  Harvard  University, 
has  a  well  marked  fulvous  elytral  bead. 

Upon  the  completion  of  this  study,  behavior  voucher  specimens  will  be 
deposited  in  the  collections  at  Cornell  University,  the  California  Academy 
of  Sciences,  the  United  States  National  Museum,  the  University  of  Florida, 
Harvard  University,  and  the  University  of  Michigan. 

The  following  additions  to  Green’s  1965  key  are  made;  Couplet  20, 
page  567,  first  alternative,  in  place  of  “(17)  P.  collustrans  LeConte”  intro¬ 
duce  the  following  couplet. 

Elytral  sutural  bead  black  in  apical  one-third  to  one-half - P.  TANYTOXUS  Lloyd 

Elytral  sutural  bead  fulvous  throughout - P.  COLLUSTRANS  LeConte 

Couplet  25,  page  568,  second  alternative,  in  place  of  “(25)  P.  consanguin- 
eus  LeConte”  introduce  the  following  couplet. 

Procoxae  with  anterior  surfaces  fuscous  or  piceous.  Mesocoxae  with  anterior  surfaces 

fuscous  or  piceous  without  pale  areas - P.  MACDERMOTTI  Lloyd 

Procoxae  with  anterior  surfaces  pale.  Mesocoxae  with  anterior  surfaces  pale  or  with 

pale  areas  - P.  CONSANGUINEUS  LeConte 


Literature  Cited 


Green,  J.  W. 

1965.  Revision  of  the  nearctic  species  of  Photinus  (Lampyridae:  Coleoptera). 
Proc.  Calif.  Acad  Sci.  28 ( 15) : 56 1-6 13,  19  figs. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


47 


NOTES  ON  THE  NEARCTIC  ANTHOPHAGINI  WITH  A 

KEY  TO  THE  GENERA 
(COLEOPTERA:  STAPHYLINIDAE) 

By  Ian  Moore1-  2 


Considerable  confusion  exists  in  the  Nearctic  literature  concerning;  the 
charactemation  of  a  number  of  genera  of  the  Anthophagini,  the  largest 
tribe  of  the  subfamily  Omaliinae.  In  the  present  paper  I  am  presenting  the 
results  of  some  studies  of  the  group,  partly  in  order  to  correct  some 
existing  errors,  but  largely  in  order  to  present  a  new  key  to  the  Nearctic 
genera.  Members  of  all  the  genera  have  been  examined. 

The  Omaliinae  can  be  distinguished  from  all  other  Nearctic  staphylinids 
except  the  Leptotyphlinae  by  the  presence  of  a  pair  of  pale  mounds 
on  the  upper  surface  of  the  head  near  a  line  drawn  through  the  posterior 
margin  of  the  eyes.  ( Vellica  longipennis  Casey  lacks  these  structures 
but  is  obviously  a  member  of  the  tribe.)  These  mounds  have  generally 
been  called  ocelli  ”  Coiffait,  1959,  demonstrated  that  they  are  not  true 
ocelli  as  found  m  the  Orthoptera  and  Hymenoptera,  but  mark  the  point  of 
attachment  of  the  posterior  arm  of  the  tentorum.  He  proposed  the  name 
frontal  calluses  for  these  structures.  The  Omaliinae  differ  from  the 

Leptotyphlinae  in  having  five-segmented  tarsi,  whereas  a  lesser  number 
is  present  in  the  latter  subfamily. 

The  Anthophagini  may  be  briefly  characterized  as  follows:  last  segment 
of  maxillary  palpi  longer  than  width  of  penultimate,  usually  not  narrower 
than  penultimate;  tarsi  with  first  four  segments  not  wider  than  fifth  seg¬ 
ment;  last  segment  of  posterior  tarsi  shorter  than  first  four  together 
segments  two  through  four  usually  decreasing  in  length. 

Members  of  this  tribe  are  known  largely  from  the  Holarctic  region 
have  been  found  in  Australia,  New  Zealand  and  the  Andean  areas 
ot  Chi  e  and  Argentina.  Most  of  the  few  known  tropic  species  were 
probably  collected  at  high  altitudes. 


Although  the  key  to  the  genera  which  follows  is  clear,  the  use  of  it 
involves  considerable  difficulty  due  to  the  fact  that  the  generic  differences 
in  this  tribe  are  often  slight  and  not  easy  to  observe.  This  is  particularly 
evident  in  the  palpal  and  tarsal  structure.  The  terminal  segments  of  the 
maxillary  palpus  and  the  posterior  tarsus  of  a  member  of  each  genus  are 
illustrated  to  facilitate  identification.  Members  of  each  genus  usuallv 
conform  to  a  characteristic  facies  which  is  difficult  to  define.  Consequents 
an  outline  drawing  of  a  member  of  each  genus,  as  seen  from  above  is 
given  as  a  further  aid  to  identification. 


fornkiSSOCiate  ^  Entomology’  San  DieS°  Natural  History  Museum,  San  Diego,  Cali- 

my  gratitude  to  Horace  Last,  Jacques  R.  Heifer 
H  gh  B.  Leech,  Charles  H.  Seevers,  William  O.  Steel  and  Rupert  L  Wenzel  for 
loan  or  gift  of  specimens  and  for  other  favors.  P  zei  IOr 


48 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


Key  to  the  Nearctic  Genera  of  the  Anthophagini 


1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

14. 

15. 

16. 


20. 


21. 


2 
7 

3 
5 

4 

LeConte 

bilobed - - - PELECOMALIUM  Casey 

not  bilobed - AMPHICHROUM  Kraatz 


First  segment  of  posterior  tarsi  about  as  long  as,  or  longer  than  last  segment - 

First  segment  of  posterior  tarsi  shorter  than  last  segment - 

Last  segment  of  maxillary  palpi  not  more  than  twice  as  long  as  penultimate - 

Last  segment  of  maxillary  palpi  more  than  twice  as  long  as  penultimate - 

Last  segment  of  maxillary  palpi  not  distinctly  narrower  than  penultimate - 

Last  segment  of  maxillary  palpi  distinctly  narrower  than  penultimate  OROBANUS 
Penultimate  tarsomere 
Penultimate  tarsomere 


Head  with  impressed  nuchal  line - UNAMIS  Casey 

Head  without  nuchal  line -  6 

Head  with  a  pair  of  frontal  calluses  between  eyes - PHLAEOPTERUS  Motschoulsky 

Head  without  frontal  calluses - - - VELLICA  Casey 

Last  segment  of  maxillary  palpi  narrower  than  apex  of  penultimate -  8 

Last  segment  of  maxillary  palpi  not  narrower  than  apex  of  penultimate - 

Last  segment  of  maxillary  palpi  slender,  parallel  sided - MICROEDUS  LeConte 

Last  segment  of  maxillary  palpi  fusiform - GEODROMICUS  Redtenbacher 

All  antennomeres  densely  pubescent  -  10 

First  four  antennomeres  glabrous  except  for  a  few  long  setae -  11 

Penultimate  segment  of  maxillary  palpi  one-half  longer  than  wide - ARTOCHIA  Casey 

Penultimate  segment  of  maxillary  palpi  not  longer  than  wide - LESTEVA  Latreille 

Second  antennomere  twice  as  long  as  third - PORRHODITES  Kraatz 

Second  antennomere  not  longer  than  third -  -  12 

First  segment  of  posterior  tarsi  one-half  longer  than  second - ACIDOTA  Stephens 

First  segment  of  posterior  tarsi  not  or  very  little  longer  than  second - 

Head  with  well-impressed  nuchal  line;  last  segment  of  maxillary  palpi  seldom 

longer  than  penultimate - 

Nuchal  line  absent  or  feeble;  last  segment  of  maxillary  palpi  usually  longer  than 

penultimate  - 

Base  of  pronotum  tumid,  reflexed - PARADELIPHRUM 

Base  of  pronotum  not  tumid,  not  refiexed - 

Tarsi  with  a  small  membranous  bilobed  pad  at  base  of  ungues 

Tarsi  without  pad  at  base  of  ungues - 

not  more  than  one-half 


13 


14 


Last  segment 
penultimate 
Last  segment 
mate - 


of  maxillary  palpi 


of  maxillary  palpi  more  than  twice  as  long 


17. 

Pronotum  not  widest  at  base 

18. 

Pronotum  widest  at  base  - 

Mesosternum  carinate - 

- MATHRILAEUM  NEW 

19. 

Mesosternum  not  carinate 

Gular  sutures  united  (or  extremely  approximate) 

Gular  sutures  distinctly  separate - 

_ OLOPHRUM  E 

17 
Hatch 

-  15 

ANTHOPHAGUS  Gravenhorst 

-  16 

longer  than 
ARPEDIUM  Erichson 
as  penulti- 
XYLODROMUS  Heer 

18 
21 

N  US 
19 

Erichson 


20 

Head  abruptly  constricted  behind  eyes  to  form  a  distinct  neck;  tempora  much  shorter 
than  eyes _ ANTHOBIUM  Leach 

Head  not  constricted  behind  eyes;  tempora  longer  than  eyes - OROCHARES  Kraatz 

Head  produced  in  a  beak  which  anterior  to  eyes  is  one-half  longer  than 

wide _ TANYRRHINUS  Mannerheim 

Head  anterior  to  eyes  not  longer  than  wide - TRIGONODEMUS  LeConte 


Discussions 

OROBANUS.  Members  of  this  genus  are  distinctive  within  this  tribe 
in  that  the  last  segment  of  the  maxillary  palpi  is  shorter  and  much  narrower 
than  the  preceding  segment.  In  Microedus  and  Geodromicus  a  similar  but 
much  less  pronounced  condition  occurs.  In  the  latter  two  genera,  the 
first  segment  of  the  posterior  tarsus  is  much  shorter  than  the  last  segment, 
whereas  in  Orobanus  the  first  segment  is  longer  than  the  last. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


49 


Seven  species  are  known  from  the  Western  United  States  and  British 
Columbia.  The  genus  was  revised  by  Mank,  1934. 

PELECOMALIUM.  The  bilobed  penultimate  tarsomere  is  a  unique 
character  within  the  tribe,  as  also  is  the  strongly  sexually  dimorphic 
maxillary  palpus. 

Twelve  species  are  at  present  recognized  in  this  genus.  Eleven  of  these 
are  known  from  the  Western  United  States,  British  Columbia  and  Alaska. 
The  other  is  from  Pennsylvania. 

Some  of  Casey’s  species  appear  to  be  weakly  separated  from  scutatum 
and  opaculum ;  the  color  is  variable  and  other  differences  given  seem  light. 

AMPHICROUM.  Members  of  this  genus  resemble  those  of  Pele- 
comalium  but  differ  in  palpal  and  tarsal  structure. 

Three  Nearctic  species  are  known  from  Southern  California  to  Alaska. 
Seven  species  have  been  described  from  the  Palaearctic  region  and  two 
from  India. 

UNAMIS.  There  is  no  single  outstanding  character  to  distinguish 
these  small  dark  insects.  They  resemble  members  of  Phlaeopterus,  from 
which  they  differ  in  having  a  transverse  impressed  line  across  the  upper 
surface  of  the  head,  just  behind  the  frontal  calluses. 

The  four  known  species  are  found  on  the  Pacific  coast  from  British 
Columbia  to  middle  California.  Hatch,  1957,  gives  a  key  to  the  species. 

PHLAEOPTERUS.  These  are  moderate-sized  dark  insects  which  are 
usually  rather  strongly  flattened  dorso-ventrally. 

The  fourteen  described  species  are  from  the  Western  United  States, 
Western  Canada  and  Alaska.  All  but  three  of  these  are  treated  by  Hatch 
1957. 

VELLICA.  The  single  species,  longipennis  Casey,  is  remarkable  in 
lacking  frontal  calluses.  Structurally  it  resembles  Phlaeopterus  and  Unamis, 
but  is  small  and  not  depressed.  It  is  apparently  not  common  in  Northern 
California. 

Vellica  is  an  example  of  the  exception  so  often  encountered  in  taxonomy. 
The  outstanding  characteristic  of  the  group  is  lacking,  but  the  insect  is 
otherwise  so  similar  to  others  of  the  group  that  it  cannot  be  excluded 
merely  because  it  lacks  frontal  calluses.  Conversely,  Brathinus  must  be 
excluded  from  the  family  Staphylinidae  (as  explained  later),  although 
it  has  frontal  calluses. 

MICROEDUS.  These  small,  dark  insects  are  structurally  similar  to 
members  of  Geodromicus,  but  differ  in  palpal  structure.  The  last  segment 
of  the  maxillary  palpus  is  somewhat  narrower  than  the  preceding  and  is 
nearly  parallel-sided  for  most  of  its  length.  In  Geodromicus,  the  last 
segment  is  thickened  centrally  and  gradually  narrowed  to  base  and  to 
apex.  In  members  of  both  of  these  genera  the  fourth  posterior  tarsomere 
has  beneath,  extending  distally  from  its  apex,  a  small,  membranous 
appendage,  the  apex  of  which  bears  a  pair  of  long  setae  which  extend 
between  the  ungues.  I  have  not  observed  this  structure  in  other  members 
of  the  tribe. 


50 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


Six  species  are  known  from  the  western  United  States  and  British 
Columbia,  and  one  of  these  is  also  found  in  Newfoundland.  Hatch,  1957, 
treated  all  of  the  species. 

GEODROMICUS.  These  moderate-sized  beetles  are  sometimes  marked 
with  patterns  of  red  or  yellow.  An  unusual  appendage  on  the  underside 
of  the  posterior  tarsus  is  described  in  the  notes  under  Microedus. 

Twelve  species  are  reported  from  the  Nearctic  region,  two  of  which 
are  also  known  from  Europe.  Twenty-five  other  species  have  been 
described  from  the  Palaearctic  region  and  sixteen  from  India. 

ARTOCHIA.  The  elongation  of  the  front  of  the  head  is  unusual  in  this 
subfamily.  A  much  more  pronounced  elongation  of  the  head  occurs  in 
Tanyrrhinus,  but  the  palpal  structure  and  the  facies  will  readily  distinguish 
them.  The  form  of  the  maxillary  palpi  (as  illustrated)  will  aid  in  identifi¬ 
cation  of  members  of  the  genus. 

The  two  known  species,  both  from  California,  are  apparently  rare. 
The  elytra  of  productijrons  are  as  long  as  wide,  whereas  in  calijornica 
they  are  much  longer  than  wide. 

LESTEVA.  The  palpal  structure  is  the  most  distinguishing  character¬ 
istic  of  species  of  this  genus.  The  very  short  penultimate  segment  and  the 
very  long  last  segment  is  an  unusual  combination. 

Two  species  are  known  from  the  Northern  United  States,  Canada  and 
Alaska.  Twenty-four  other  species  have  been  described  from  the  Palae¬ 
arctic  region  and  four  from  India. 

Casey,  1893,  erected  the  genus  Tevales  for  a  new  species,  cribratulus. 
At  the  same  time,  he  proposed  the  generic  name  Pseudolesteva  for 
Lesteva  pallipes  LeConte,  later  changing  the  generic  name  to  Paralesteva 
on  the  assumption  that  Pseudolesteva  was  preoccupied.  Steel,  1952, 
showed  that  the  two  species  for  which  Casey  has  established  these  two 
genera  were  not  sufficiently  distinct  to  warrant  separate  genera  for  them. 
He  united  them  with  Lesteva. 

Blackwelder,  1952,  demonstrated  that  the  type-species  of  Lesteva  is 
in  the  genus  called  Anthophagus,  which  name  (under  a  strict  application 
of  the  rules)  it  should  replace.  Since  this  left  the  genus  without  a  name, 
he  proposed  the  name  Lesta  for  it.  Blackwelder  was  unaware  of  Steel’s 
study  of  the  same  year,  which  synonymized  Tevales,  Pseudolesteva  and 
Paralesteva  with  Lesteva.  If  a  strict  application  of  the  rules  is  to  be 
accepted,  the  correct  name  to  apply  to  this  genus  would  be  Tevales  Casey. 
However,  much  confusion  would  exist  if  this  name  were  changed.  Subse¬ 
quent  students  have  continued  to  use  the  names  Lesteva  and  Anthophagus 
in  their  original  sense.  It  is  reasonable  to  assume  that  the  International 
Commission  on  Zoological  Nomenclature  will  conserve  these  older  names. 
Consequently,  I  am  using  the  older  name,  Lesteva,  for  this  genus,  and 
Anthophagus  for  the  genus  which  has  long  been  known  by  that  name. 
Assuming  that  the  International  Commission  on  Zoological  Nomenclature 
will  conserve  the  name  Lesteva  in  its  original  sense,  the  American  species 
should  be  listed  as  follows:  Lesteva  Latreille,  1896,  with  Tevales  Casey, 
1893,  Pseudolesteva  Casey,  1893,  Paralesteva  Casey,  1905,  and  Lesta 
Blackwelder,  1952,  as  synonyms,  and  with  two  species,  cribratulus 
(Casey),  1893,  and  pallipes  LeConte,  1863. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


51 


PORRHODITES.  A  second  antennomere,  twice  as  long  as  the  third 
is  unique  within  the  tribe.  In  other  members  of  the  tribe  this  segment  is 
not  longer  than  the  third  and  often  much  shorter. 

A  single  circumpolar  species  of  this  genus  has  been  reported  from 
Labrador,  Michigan,  Colorado,  British  Columbia,  Alaska  and  Europe. 

ACIDOTA.  There  is  no  single  character  to  distinguish  members  of  this 
genus  from  others  of  the  tribe.  They  are  coarsely  sculptured,  with  shining 
integuments. 

The  three  known  American  species  are  northern  in  distribution.  Two 

of  the  American  species  and  five  other  species  are  found  in  the  Palaearctic 
region. 

PARADELIPHRUM.  The  tumid,  reflexed  base  of  the  pronotum  is  not 
pronounced  but  is  an  unusual  character. 

Hatch,  1957,  described  this  genus  and  two  species,  tumiduwi  from 
British  Columbia  and  Oregon,  and  inflation  from  British  Columbia.  I  have 
seen  specimens  of  the  latter  from  California  and  Colorado. 

ANTHOPHAGUS.  As  this  genus  has  not  previously  been  reported 
from  America,  a  generic  description  follows: 

Head  oval,  strongly  constricted  behind  to  form  a  neck;  with  a  definite  nuchal 
constriction  across  the  dorsal  surface;  with  a  discrete  longitudinal  impression  each 
side  before  the  frontal  calluses.  Labrum  tranverse,  shallowly  emarginate  in  front. 
Mandibles  stout,  pointed.  Maxillary  palpi  four-segmented;  first  segment  small- 
second  elongate,  curved,  widest  at  apex;  third  about  as  long  as  second,  apex  wider 
than  second,  fourth  a  little  longer  and  almost  as  wide  as  third,  narrowed  apically 
Outer  lobe  of  maxillae  longer  than  inner  lobe,  curved  at  apex,  which  is  densely 
pubescent;  inner  lobe  hooked  at  apex,  inner  margin  setose  and  pubescent.  Ligula 
triangularly  emarginate  at  apex.  Labial  palpi  three-segmented;  first  segment  short- 
second  longer,  swollen  apically;  third  about  as  long  as  second,  narrower"  cylindrical’ 
Gular  sutures  united  at  middle,  widely  divergent  behind. 

Pronotum  about  as  wide  as  head,  constricted  behind.  Prosternal  process  pointed 
extending  halfway  between  the  coxae.  Mesosternum  not  carinate,  its  process  short 
and  pointed.  Middle  coxae  contiguous.  Elytra  wider  than  pronotum. 

Tibiae  pubescent,  with  a  few  spines  externally.  Posterior  tarsi  with  first  four 
segments  short,  subequal,  fifth  a  little  shorter  than  the  first  four  together.  With 
a  small  bilobed  membranous  pad  between  the  ungues. 

This  genus  differs  from  all  other  omaliinids  in  the  presence  of  the  small 
bilobed  membranous  pad  between  the  claws. 

The  use  of  this  name  rather  than  Lesteva  for  this  genus,  as  proposed 
by  Blackwelder,  1952,  has  been  discussed  in  the  notes  under  the  genus 
Lesteva. 

A  series  of  specimens  very  similar  to  the  European  A.  caraboides  Linne 
was  collected  at  Prairie  Creek,  California,  by  Van  Dyke  in  August, 
1939.  These  are  now  being  studied  by  William  O.  Steel. 

Thirty-two  species  of  this  genus  are  known  from  Europe,  and  three 
species  from  Japan. 

ARPEDIUM.  Members  of  this  genus  vary  considerably  in  facies.  The 
distinguishing  generic  characters  are  not  pronounced. 

Of  the  nine  species  reported  from  America,  at  least  three  are  also 
known  from  the  Palaearctic  region.  Fourteen  other  species  have  been 


52 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


Figures  1-9.  Neartic  Anthophagini,  one  species  of  each  genus;  outline  drawings 
of  the  body,  as  seen  from  above,  the  last  three  segments  of  the  maxillary  palpus,  and 
the  posterior  tarsus..  1 — Orobanus  densus  Casey.  2 — Pelecomalium  puberulum 
Fauvel.  3 — Amphicroum  fioribundum  LeConte.  4 — Unamis  truncata  Casey. 
5 — Phlaeopterus  fusconiger  Motschoulsky.  6 — Vellica  longipennis  Casey.  7 — Micro- 
edus  ewingi  Hatch.  8 — Geodromicus  plagiatus  (Fabricius).  9 — Artochia  calif ornica 
Bernhauer. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


53 


described  from  the  Palaearctic  region  and  one,  a  doubtful  member  of 
the  genus,  from  India.  The  American  species  are  difficult  to  identify 
from  the  existing  literature. 

XYLODROMUS.  The  American  species  tend  to  be  parallel  in  form 
with  moniliform  antennae. 

Although  I  have  not  seen  Casey’s  types,  his  descriptions  are  in  sufficient 
detail  to  lead  me  to  believe  that  the  synonomy  in  the  following  list  of 
the  three  Nearctic  species  is  correct. 

capito  (Casey)  NEW  COMBINATION.  (Omalium) 
concinnus  (Marsham) 

lacustre  Casey  NEW  SYNONYMY.  (Omalium) 
depressus  (Gravenhorst) 

Capito  was  described  from  Wisconsin.  The  other  two  species  are  widely 
distributed  in  the  northern  part  of  the  continent  and  also  in  the  Palaearctic 
region,  from  which  seven  other  species  are  known. 

MATHRILAEUM  Moore  NEW  GENUS. 

Head  wider  than  long;  somewhat  produced  in  front,  the  anterior  margin  vaguely 
tumid;  irregularly  impressed  before  the  frontal  calluses;  eyes  large,  prominent;  sides 
with  a  strongly  reflexed  border  behind  the  eyes,  thence  abruptly  narrowed  to  a 
broad  neck.  Antennae  incrassate.  Labrum  transverse,  emarginate  in  front.  Mandibles 
stout,  base  thickened,  abruptly  flattened  in  apical  third,  strongly  arcuate  and  hooked 
at  apex.  Maxillary  palpi  four-segmented;  first  segment  short;  second  elongate, 
arcuate,  widest  at  apex;  third  shorter  than  and  about  as  wide  as  second;  fourth 
wider  and  longer  than  second,  gradually  narrowed  to  apex.  Outer  lobe  of  maxillae 
longer  and  wider  than  inner  lobe,  externally  at  apex  with  a  row  of  spines,  internally 
densely  pubescent;  inner  lobe  hooked  at  tip,  setose  internally.  Ligula  tranverse, 
apex  emarginate,  with  a  central  chitonous  rod.  Labial  palpi  three-segmented;  first 
segment  longer  than  wide;  second  a  little  narrower  than  first,  tranverse;  third 
narrower  than  second,  longer  than  wide,  subcylindrical.  Mentum  large,  trapezoidal. 
Gular  sutures  united  at  the  middle,  widely  divergent  behind. 

Pronotum  transverse,  subquadrate,  side  margins  crenulate.  Prosternum  tumid 
in  the  middle,  its  process  long  and  pointed.  Mesosternum  strongly,  longitudinally 
carinate,  its  process  long,  pointed,  extending  more  than  halfway  between  the 
coxae.  Metasternal  process  short,  rounded,  not  meeting  the  mesosternal  process. 
Elytra  covering  most  of  the  abdomen;  with  impressed  longitudinal  striae. 

Tibiae  without  spines  on  the  outer  edge.  Hind  tarsi  with  the  first  four  segments 
short,  progressively  decreasing  a  little  in  length;  fifth  segment  shorter  than  first 
four  together. 

Type-species:  Lathrimaeum  pictum  Fauvel. 

Also  included  in  this  genus  is  Lathrimaeum  subcostatum  Maklin.  These  two  species 
have  always  been  placed  in  the  genus  now  called  Anthobium.  In  Anthobium  the 
mesosternum  is  not  carinate,  the  gular  sutures  are  separated  and  the  tibiae  usually 
have  a  few  spines  externally. 

The  two  known  species  are  found  in  fungus  from  British  Columbia  to  middle 
California. 


Key  to  the  Species  of  Mathrilaeum 

Elytra  with  three  to  five  rows  of  punctures  between  suture  and  first  raised  inter¬ 
space  - - - SUBCOSTATUM  (Maklin) 

Elytra  with  single  row  of  punctures  between  suture  and  first  raised  inter¬ 
space  - PICTUM  (Fauvel) 


Figures  10-18.  Nearctic  Anthophagini,  one  species  of  each  genus;  outline  drawings 
of  the  body,  as  seen  from  above,  the  last  three  segments  of  the  maxillary  palpus 
and  the  posterior  tarsus.  10 — Lesteva  cribratulus  (Casey).  11 — Porrhodites  fenestralis 
(Zetterstedt).  12 — Acidota  quadrata  Zetterstedt.  13 — Paradeliphrum  inflatum  Hatch. 
14 — Anthophagus  sp.  15 — Arpedium  quadrum  (Gravenhorst).  16 — Xylodromus 
depressus  (Gravenhorst).  17 — Mathrilaeum  pictum  (Fauvel).  18 — Olophrum 
obtectum  Erichson. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


55 


OLOPHRUM.  It  has  usually  been  stated  that  members  of  this  genus 
lack  spines  on  the  outer  edge  of  the  tibiae,  a  character  which  has  been 
used  to  differentiate  several  related  genera.  This  character  is  variable 
within  this  genus,  some  species  having  no  spines,  others  a  few  and  some 
quite  a  number.  The  character  cannot  be  employed  advantageously  in  this 
section  of  the  tribe. 

I  have  seen  specimens  of  Olophrum  nigropiceum  Motschoulsky  from 
Alaska,  previously  known  only  from  Siberia. 

Thirteen  Nearctic  species  are  known,  four  of  which  are  also  reported 
from  the  Palaearctic  region.  Thirty-six  other  Palaearctic  species,  and  one 
species  from  India,  have  been  described. 

ANTHOBIUM.  Members  of  this  genus  have  no  single  outstanding 
character  for  their  easy  recognition.  It  has  usually  been  stated  that  the 
tibiae  of  members  of  this  genus  are  not  spinose  on  the  outer  edge,  one 
of  the  characters  used  to  separate  the  genus  from  Deliphrum.  The  type- 
species,  melanocephalum  (Gyllenhal),  and  a  number  of  other  species  have 
a  distinct  series  of  small  spines  interspersed  with  the  pubescence  on  the 
outer  edge  of  the  tibiae.  As  with  Olophrum,  this  is  not  a  dependable 
character.  I  can  find  no  character  of  importance  to  separate  the  type- 
species  of  Deliphrum,  tectum  (Paykull),  from  Anthobium  melanocephalum 
(Gyllenhal),  so  I  am  uniting  the  two  genera  (NEW  SYNONYMY). 

Anthobium  pictum  (Fauvel)  and  subcostatum  (Maklin)  have  been 
removed  in  this  paper  to  the  new  genus  Mathrilaeum. 

The  Nearctic  species  are  as  follows:  Anthobium  aequicolle  (Casey) 
NEW  COMBINATION  (Deliphrum),  atrocephalum  (Gyllenhal),  clarki 
Hatch,  crenulatum  Hatch,  expansum  (LeConte)  NEW  COMBINATION 
(Deliphrum),  fimetarium  (Mannerheim),  marginatum  (Kirby  &  Spence), 
nigropiceum  (Casey),  occiduum  (Casey)  NEW  COMBINATION  (Deli¬ 
phrum),  reflexicolle  (Casey),  sinuosum  Hatch,  and  spretum  Hatch. 


Figures  19-22.  Nearctic  Anthophagini,  one  species  of  each  genus;  outline  drawings 
of  the  body,  as  seen  from  above,  the  last  three  segments  of  the  maxillary  palpus 
and  the  posterior  tarsus.  19 —Anthobium  atrocephalum  (Gyllenhal).  20 — Orochares 
angustata  (Erichson).  21 — Tanyrrhinus  singularis  Mannerheim.  22 — Trigonodemus 
striatus  LeConte. 


56 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


Of  the  above  twelve  species,  only  one,  atrocephalum,  is  reported  from 
the  Palaearctic  region.  Twenty-eight  other  species  have  been  described 
from  the  Palaearctic  region  and  eight  from  India. 

OROCHARES.  The  only  known  species,  the  European  angustata 
(Erichson),  has  been  reported  from  Massachusetts.  Although  this  record 
appears  to  be  in  doubt,  its  inclusion  here  will  facilitate  its  recognition 
should  it  be  found  to  be  established  in  this  country. 

TANYRRHINUS.  Aside  from  its  unusual  facies  with  the  elongate 
head,  there  is  little  to  distinguish  the  single  species  of  this  genus  from 
other  genera  of  the  Anthophagini.  It  is  known  from  Alaska  to  middle  Cali¬ 
fornia. 

TRIGONODEMUS.  The  species  are  very  similar  to  Tanyrrhinus  singu¬ 
lars  Mannerheim,  but  lack  the  long  beak.  Only  two  species  are  known, 
both  from  the  Nearctic  region. 

BRATHINUS  LeConte.  Some  authors  have  treated  this  genus  as  a 
member  of  this  tribe.  Others  have  put  it  in  a  family  by  itself.  I  am  ex¬ 
cluding  it  from  the  Staphylinidae  because  the  first  four  tergites  (dorsal 
segments  three  through  six)  are  membranous. 

EUNONIA  Casey.  I  have  seen  two  specimens  in  the  Bernhauer  col¬ 
lection  labeled  “Eunonia  keeninana  Casey,”  collected  near  Prince  Rupert, 
British  Columbia,  by  Keen.  They  answer  perfectly  to  Casey’s  description 
of  this  species  except  for  the  absence  of  frontal  calluses.  They  are  speci¬ 
mens  of  a  species  of  Syntomium,  either  identical  with  or  very  similar  to 
Syntomium  malkini  Hatch.  The  head  is  very  roughly  sculptured  in  this 
species,  which  probably  led  Casey  to  believe  that  he  detected  “ocelli.” 
Thus,  Eunonia  Casey,  1904,  equals  Syntomium  Curtis,  1828  (NEW 
SYNONYMY);  the  genus  belongs  in  the  Oxytelinae. 

REVELSTOKEA.  Revelstokea  hopping  Hatch  is  being  treated  by 
William  O.  Steel. 


Literature  Cited 

Blackwelder,  Richard  Eliot 

1952.  The  generic  names  of  the  beetle  family  Staphylinidae  with  an  essay  on 
genotypy.  Bull.  United  States  Nat.  Mus.  200: 1-483. 

Casey,  Thomas  Lincoln 

1893.  Coleopterological  notices,  V.  Ann.  New  York  Acad.  Sci.  7:281-606,  1  pi. 
1904.  On  some  new  Coleoptera,  including  five  new  genera.  Can.  Ent. 
36:3 12-324. 

Coiffait,  Henri 

1959.  Monographic  de  Leptotyphlites  (Col.  Staphylinidae).  Rev.  Franc.  Ent. 
26:237-437,  808  figs. 

Hatch,  Melville  Harrison 

1957.  The  beetles  of  the  Pacific  Northwest.  Part  II:  Staphyliniformia.  Univ. 
Washington  Publ.  Biol.  16:  i-x;  1-384,  37  pis. 

Mank,  Edith 

1934.  New  species  of  Orobanus.  Pan-Pac.  Ent.  10: 121-124,  18  figs. 

Steel,  William  O. 

1952.  Notes  on  Omaliinae  (Col.  Staphylinidae).  Ent.  Mo.  Mag.  88:8-9,  5  figs. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


57 


CHANGES  IN  NOMENCLATURE  AND  REASSIGNMENT  OF 

PLATYDESSUS  PERFORATUS 
(COLEOPTERA:  DYTISCIDAE) 

By  Paul  J.  Spangler12 


While  trying  to  identify  and  describe 
some  South  American  bidessine  bee¬ 
tles,  it  was  necessary  to  examine  the 
type  of  the  monotypic  genus  Platydes¬ 
sus  described  and  assigned  to  the  tribe 
Bidessini  by  Guignot  (1955).  Through 
the  kindness  of  Mr.  G.  Frey,  Museum 
G.  Frey,  Munich,  Germany,  I  was 
able  to  borrow  the  female  type  of 
Platydessus  perforatus  Guignot  for 
study. 

As  I  suspected  when  I  read  that  the 
type  specimen  was  5  mm.  long  (un¬ 
usually  large  for  a  bidessine),  the 
type  does  not  belong  to  the  tribe 
Bidessini.  I  have  examined  the  meta- 
thoracic  episterna  of  perforatus  and 
found  that  they  are  excluded  from  the 
middle  coxal  cavities  by  the  meso- 
sternal  epimera;  therefore,  the  species 
is  excluded  from  the  Bidessini.  Also, 
the  prosternal  process  is  short  and  does 
not  attain  the  metasternum  so  the  spe¬ 
cies  belongs  to  the  Vatellini.  The  meso- 
sternum  is  mostly  visible  too,  as  is 
characteristic  of  the  genus  Macrovatel- 
lus  described  by  Sharp  (1882).  I  have 

.  compared  perforatus  with  Macrovatel- 

aaovatellus  perforatus  (Guignot).  ius  mexicanus  Sharp  and  M.  haagi 

Wehncke  and  found  it  is  congeneric  with  them.  Consequently,  the  follow¬ 
ing  changes  are  necessary. 


M acrovatellus  Sharp 

Macrovatellus  Sharp,  1882,  Sci.  Trans.  Roy.  Dublin  Soc.  2(2):282. 
Type,  by  subsequent  designation,  Macrovatellus  marginalis  Sharp  (F. 
Guignot,  1946,  Rev.  Frangais  Ent.  13(3):  112). 

Platydessus  Guignot,  1955,  Bull.  Inst.  Roy.  Sci.  nat.  Belgique  31(27) : 3. 
Type,  by  monotypy,  Platydessus  perforatus  Guignot  (NEW  SYNONYMY). 


1  Department  of  Entomology,  United  States  National  Museum,  Smithsonian  Insti¬ 
tution,  Washington,  D.  C. 

f  This  study  was  made  possible  in  part  by  grant  GB-1697  from  the  National 
Science  Foundation. 


58 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


Macrovatellus  perforatus  (Guignot)  NEW  COMBINATION 

Platydessus  perforatus  Guignot,  1955,  Bull.  Inst.  Roy.  Sci.  nat.  Belgique 
31(27)  :4.  Type  female:  “Bolivia”;  in  the  G.  Frey  Museum,  Munich, 
Germany. 

Because  Guignot’s  perforatus  has  never  been  illustrated,  a  dorsal  view 
(fig.  1)  of  his  type  specimen  is  included.  The  distinctive  habitus  of  species 
belonging  to  the  genus  Macrovatellus  is  characteristic  for  most  of  the 
Vatellini. 

Literature  Cited 

Guignot,  F. 

1955.  Description  de  Nouveaux  Dytiscidae  Principalement  de  L’Amerique  du 
Sud.  Bull.  Inst.  Roy.  Sci.  nat.  Belgique  3 1(27):  1-12. 

Sharp,  D. 

1882.  On  Aquatic  Carnivorous  Coleoptera  or  Dytiscidae.  Sci.  Trans.  Roy. 
Dublin  Soc.  2(2) :  179-1003. 


NOTICE 

In  the  March  issue  of  the  Bulletin,  Vol.  20,  No.  1,  on  page  11.  Spangler’s  new 
species  of  Derovatellus  is  spelled  ibarri.  It  should  have  been  spelled  ibarrai.  The 
name  is  spelled  correctly  in  all  other  parts  of  the  article. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


59 


GNATHIUM  MINIMUM  (SAY)  IN  ILLINOIS 
(COLEOPTERA:  MELOIDAE) 

By  John  K.  Bouseman1’  2 


On  August  11  and  12,  1962,  while  collecting  in  an  area  of  sand- 
prairie  along  the  Mississippi  River  three  miles  south  of  Savanna,  Illinois, 
I  found  many  adults  of  Gnathium  minimum  (Say)  on  flowers  of  Helianthus. 
Most  of  the  beetles  were  on  flowers  of  Helianthus  petiolaris,  but  a  few  were 
on  H.  occidentalis  and  H.  rigidus.  Seventy-three  specimens  were  collected 
on  the  two  days.  On  August  19,  1962,  I  returned  to  the  sand-prairie  and 
found  G.  minimum  on  H.  petiolaris  three  miles  north  of  Fulton,  Illinois.  At 
this  locality  egg  masses  of  the  beetle  were  present  on  H.  petiolaris.  Females 
oviposit  at  the  base  of  the  bracts  of  the  host  plant.  Two  egg  masses  from  the 
bracts  of  a  single  flower  yielded  a  total  of  290  larvae.  Six  egg  masses  de¬ 
posited  in  the  laboratory  by  caged  females  hatched  in  six  or  seven  days. 

MacSwain  (1952,  Wasmann  Jour.  Biol.  10:205-224)  has  summarized 
the  known  distributions  of  the  species  of  Gnathium  occurring  in  the  United 
States.  My  records  of  G.  minimum  are  of  especial  interest  as  they  are  not 
only  the  first  for  Gnathium  in  Illinois,  but  are  also  new  northeastern  limital 
records  for  the  genus.  Further,  they  are  the  first  records  at  this  latitude 
for  G.  minimum  east  of  Nebraska. 

Gnathium  minimum  is  probably  a  member  of  that  group  of  insects 
which  find  their  easternmost  distributional  limits  in  the  xeric  sand-prairies 
of  western  Illinois.  It  is  of  interest  to  note  that  Helianthus  petiolaris  is 
believed  to  be  adventive  in  Illinois  from  the  western  United  States  (Jones, 
1963,  Amer.  Midland  Natur.  Monogr.  No.  7:1-401).  G.  minimum  might 
also  be  a  recent  migrant  to  the  state. 


1  Department  of  Entomology,  University  of  Illinois,  Urbana. 

2  Thanks  are  due  to  Barbara  A.  Bouseman  and  John  M.  Campbell  for  their 
assistance  in  the  field  and  to  Richard  B.  Selander  who  verified  the  determination 
of  the  beetles. 


BEETLE  TALK 

The  G.  H.  Dieke  collection  of  beetles  and  entomological  library  was  acquired  by 
the  U.  S.  National  Museum  in  1965.  Dieke  was  chairman  of  the  Physics  Department 
of  Johns  Hopkins  University  in  Baltimore.  His  special  entomological  interest  was  the 
Coccinellidae,  and  the  collection  is  especially  rich  in  specimens  (about  14,000)  of 
that  family.  Furthermore,  the  predominance  is  in  the  Epilachninae,  Dieke's  favorites. 

A  large  part  of  the  synoptic  collection  of  Anastase  Alfieri  was  acquired  by  the 
U.  S.  National  Museum  in  1966.  Alfieri,  of  Cairo,  is  Secretary  General  of  Societe 
Entomologique  d’Egypte.  The  collection  contains  Coleoptera,  Hymenoptera,  Neu- 
roptera,  and  a  smattering  of  other  orders.  It  is  not  a  huge  collection,  consisting 
of  a  few  specimens  of  many  species,  but  all  are  identified,  some  being  type  material, 
and  all  are  from  Egypt  or  nearby.  The  Coleoptera  are  most  numerous,  with  3805 
specimens  of  1929  species. 


60 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


A  NEW  GENUS  AND  NEW  SPECIES  OF  ANOBIIDAE  FROM 
JAMAICA  WITH  A  LARVAL  DESCRIPTION 

(COLEOPTERA) 

By  Richard  E.  White1 

An  undescribed  species  of  Anobiidae  has  several  times  been  intercepted 
in  coconut  palms  from  Jamaica;  it  is  sufficiently  distinct  from  described 
genera  to  warrant  a  new  generic  name.  The  larval  description  is  from 
specimens  associated  with  adults. 

Parobius  White,  NEW  GENUS 

General:  Body  quite  elongate,  nearly  paralled-sided,  nearly  cylindrical  in  form; 
pronotum  sharply  margined,  fully  as  wide  as  elytra;  pubescence  fine,  appressed, 
moderate  in  density,  evenly  distributed;  surfaces  granulate-punctate. 

Head:  Eyes  distinctly  bulging,  more  strongly  so  in  male;  antennae  1 1-segmented, 
14  to  14  length  of  body,  segments  4  to  8  inclusive  nearly  equal  in  size  and  shape, 
last  3  segments  enlarged,  together  nearly  as  long  as  all  preceding;  clypeus  and 
labrum  distinct;  maxillary  and  labial  palpi  similar,  basal  segment  moderate  in 
length.  2nd  shortest,  3rd  longest  and  widest,  pointed  at  apex. 

Dorsal  surfaces:  Pronotum  wider  than  long,  broadest  anteriorly,  punctures  largest, 
most  distinct  on  disk;  scutellum  nearly  square,  a  little  wider  than  long;  elytra  lacking 
striae  and  grooves,  granules  indistinct,  punctures  nearly  evenly  distributed. 

Ventral  surfaces:  Prosternum  distinctly  wider  than  long,  length  before  coxae  about 
equal  to  longitudinal  coxal  diameter,  prolonged  between  coxae,  front  coxae  rather 
small,  oval,  narrowly  separated;  mesosternum  similar  in  form  to  prosternum;  meso- 
coxae  oval,  narrowly  separated,  a  little  larger  than  front  coxae;  metasternum  rather 
long,  not  declivous  in  front,  longitudinally  sulcate  posteriorly;  metepisternum 
distinctly  widest  anteriorly;  metacoxae  narrowly  separated  at  center,  distinctly 
transversely  grooved  near  center,  more  open  laterally;  first  abdominal  suture  not  as 
distinct  as  others,  curving  posteriorly  at  center,  others  nearly  straight,  segment  1 
longest,  2  and  3  moderate,  nearly  equal,  4  shortest,  5  moderate;  legs  rather  stout; 
tarsi  short,  broad,  2nd  and  3rd  segments  prolonged  ventrally,  4th  segment  broad, 
flat,  5th  segment  arising  near  base  of  4th,  claws  simple. 

Type-species:  Parobius  globulus  White,  sp.  nov. 

The  genus  Parobius  is  a  member  of  the  subfamily  Dryophilinae  and, 
among  North  American  genera,  is  most  similar  in  general  form  to  Ernobius 
Thomson  and  Xarifa  Fall.  Parobius  is  readily  distinguished  from  Ernobius 
in  that  the  front  coxae  are  oval,  moderate  in  size,  not  prominent,  and 
narrowly  separated  (they  are  conical,  prominent,  and  touching  in  Erno¬ 
bius).  Parobius  differs  from  Xarifa  in  that  the  pronotum  is  sharply 
margined  laterally;  in  Xarifa  the  pronotum  lacks  a  margin.  In  Fall’s  key 
to  the  Dryophilinae  (1905,  p.  131)  Parobius  keys  with  some  difficulty 
to  Xestobium;  in  the  latter  genus  the  prosternum  before  the  coxae  is  equal 
to  about  !/3  the  maximum  coxal  diameter,  whereas  in  Parobius  it  is  about 
equal  to  the  maximum  coxal  diameter.  In  reference  to  the  world  genera 
of  Dryophilinae  (including  the  Ernobiinae  of  some  classification  schemes), 
Parobius  is  most  similar  to  the  European  and  North  African  genus 
Ochina  Stephens.  The  latter  genus  differs  from  Parobius  in  that  the 

1  Entomology  Research  Division,  Agr.  Res.  Serv.,  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture, 
Washington,  D.  C. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


61 


prosternum  is  very  short  before  the  coxae  (equal  to  about  y3  maximum 
coxal  diameter)  and  antennal  segments  4  to  8  inclusive  are  serrate.  In 
Parobius  the  prosternum  before  the  coxae  is  about  equal  to  the  maximum 
coxal  diameter,  and  antennal  segments  4  to  8  inclusive  are  nearly  globular. 

Parobius  globulus  White,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Fig.  1) 

General:  Quite  elongate,  nearly  parallel-sided,  body  2.3  to  2.7  times  longer 
than  wide;  color  nearly  uniformly  light  reddish  brown  to  rather  dark  reddish  brown, 
usually  legs,  antennal  club,  abdomen  and  sometimes  elytral  suture  noticeably  lighter 
than  remainder;  pubescence  very  light  yellowish,  nearly  evenly  distributed,  moderate 
in  length  and  density  (somewhat  finer  on  ventral  surface),  appressed,  that  of  frons 
and  apex  of  abdomen  faintly  or  somewhat  (  $  )  to  distinctly  (  $  )  lengthened  and 
bristling;  surfaces  rather  finely  granulate-punctate. 

Head:  Frons  normal  (  $  )  or  rather  protuberant  (  $  ),  in  latter  instance  clypeus 
appearing  depressed;  surface  of  head  finely,  evenly  granulate-punctate;  bristling 
pubescence  converging  toward  midline;  eyes  separated  by  1.9  to  2.1  times  (  $  )  or 
2.2  to  2.5  times  (  $  )  their  vertical  diameter,  more  bulging  in  $  ;  antennae  about 
14  (  9  )  or  about  Vi  (  $ ;  )  length  of  body,  1st  segment  moderate  in  length,  curving, 
2nd  short,  nearly  as  wide  as  long,  3rd,  4th,  and  5th  rather  similar,  longer  than 
wide,  segments  6,  7,  and  8  similar,  progessively  rather  smaller,  segments  1  to  8 
rather  shining,  with  rather  long,  bristling  pubescence;  segments  9,  10,  and  11 
lengthened,  somewhat  broader  than  preceding  segments  and  less  shining,  club 
nearly  to  quite  as  long  as  all  preceding,  9th  and  10th  segments  similar,  widest 
apically,  11th  segment  longest,  widest  near  or  just  beyond  middle;  terminal  segment 
of  maxillary  palpus  elongate,  apex  pointed,  widest  before  middle;  terminal  seament 
of  labial  palpus  rather  elongate,  pointed  apically,  widest  at  middle. 

Dorsal  surface:  Pronotum  somewhat  flattened  at  center,  lateral  margin  sharp,  even, 
with  a  series  of  backward  projecting  hairs,  punctate,  disk  shining,  with  punctures 
large,  well  developed,  granules  obsolete,  with  feeble,  flat  carina  posteriorly;  elytra 
finely,  irregularly  granulate  and  punctate. 

Ventral  surface:  Prosternal  process  between  coxae  rather  narrow,  elongate,  some¬ 
what  broadened  apically;  short,  broad  intercoxal  process  of  anterior  margin  of 
metasternum  sulcate  at  base,  posteriorly  with  distinct,  rather  narrow,  longitudinal 
groove,  this  about  Vi  length  of  metasternum;  1st  abdominal  segment  longest,  4th 
shortest,  2nd,  3rd,  and  5th  moderate,  5th  longer  than  3rd  or  about  equal  to  it,  5th 
segment  of  9  with  2  small  posteriorly  directed  pits  near  apex,  that  of  $  simple. 

Length:  2.8  to  4.5  mm. 


Figure  1,  Parobius  globulus  sp.  nov.,  lateral  view,  $  paratype;  line  equals  actual 
size. 


62 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


This  species  is  described  from  13  individuals  (7  3  3,  6$  $)  which 
were  intercepted  in  palm  pedicels,  fronds,  and  branches  from  Jamaica. 
The  data  on  the  holotype  (  3  ,  USNM  type  number  68627)  are  as  follows: 
Ex  Jamacia  WI,  Miami  No.  6726,  58-11329,  in  coconut  pedicel  and 
frond.  The  allotype  and  3  paratypes  (2  3  3,1  $  )  bear  the  same  data. 
Two  paratypes  (1  3,1  $  )  bear  the  following  data:  Ex  Jamaica  WI, 
Miami  No.  6738,  58-11331  in  coconut  pedicel.  One  paratype  ($) 
bears  the  following:  Ex  Jamaica,  at  JFKIA  00040,  64-4246,  in  dry  palm 
branch,  Cocos  sp.  Six  paratypes  (3  3  3,3$  $)  bear  the  following:  Ex 
Jamaica,  WI,  intercepted  San  Juan,  PR.,  January  5,  1963,  63-7400,  in 
palm  branch.  In  addition  to  the  13  specimens  in  the  type  series,  I  have  seen 
3  individuals  with  the  same  data  as  the  holotype;  one  incomplete  due  to 
dissection,  the  other  2  incompletely  formed  tenerals.  The  latter  3  individ¬ 
uals  are  not  included  in  the  type  series.  All  of  the  above  specimens  are  in 
the  U.  S.  National  Museum  collection.  The  specific  name  refers  to  the 
nearly  globular  intermediate  antennal  segments.  The  abbreviation  JFKIA 
refers  to  the  J.  F.  Kennedy  International  Airport,  New  York,  N.  Y.  The 
numbers  of  the  data  refer,  respectively,  to  the  USDA  interception  and  lot 
numbers. 


Figures  2-7,  Pcirobius  globulus  sp.  nov.,  last  instar  larva.  2 — lateral  view,  line 
equals  actual  size.  3 — anterior  view  of  head.  4 — thoracic  spiracle.  5 — abdominal 
spiracles.  6 — maxilla.  7 — epipharynx. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


63 


Last  Instar  Larva 
(Figs.  2-7) 

Length:  4.1  to  4.8  mm. 

Read:  (fig.  3)  Oval,  a  little  higher  than  broad,  widest  just  below  middle,  vague 
frontal  lines  evident,  in  shape  of  an  inverted  y;  pigmented  field  behind  epistoma 
narrow,  not  sharply  set  off  posteriorly,  nearly  transversely  parallel,  with  numerous 
fairly  long  setae,  cranium  with  intermixed,  fairly  dense,  long  and  short  setae,  these 
distinctly  sparser  dorsally,  anterior  margin  of  epistoma  with  about  10  moderate 
to  long  setae;  antennae  minute,  apparently  not  segmented,  a  projecting  membrane 
beneath;  anteclypeus  lacking  setae. 

Labrum:  Transverse,  over  2  times  wider  than  long,  evenly  rounded  at  sides; 
surface  with  dense  setae,  paired  marks  present. 

Epipharynx:  Two  short  coryphal  setae  present  anteriorly,  acanthoparial  setae 
stout,  blunt,  moderate  in  length,  about  10  each  side;  5  or  6  stout  chaetoparial 
setae  each  side,  in  a  line;  tormae  short,  stout,  curved  inwardly  at  base,  crepidal 
field  with  fine  pubescence. 

Mandible:  With  2  nearly  equal  teeth  at  apex,  cutting  edge  extending  to  and 
including  tooth  or  ridge-like  elevation  between  2nd  tooth  and  base  of  mandible, 
marginal  brush  present,  directed  backward;  aboral  surface  with  proximal  patch 
of  4  to  6  long  to  short  setae,  distal  patch  of  4  or  5  rather  short  setae. 

Maxilla.  Lacinia  over  Vi  size  of  galea,  with  about  8  stout,  rather  short  setae 
arising  near  apex;  galea  with  about  9  rather  short,  quite  stout  setae,  apex  blunt, 
also  with  4  to  5  hair-like  setae;  palpi  3 -segmented,  first  2  segments  with  sparse,’ 
slender  setae,  last  segment  pointed,  lacking  setae. 

Body:  In  lateral  view  narrowest  at  level  of  4th  and  5th  abdominal  segments, 
broadest  at  level  of  7th  and  8th  segments.  Prodorsal  asperites  on  each  side  of 
segments  as  follows:  abdominal  segment  1  with  8  to  12  in  one  irregular  to  very 
irregular  row;  segment  2  with  6  to  11  in  one  fairly  even  row;  segment  3  with  5  to  8 
in  one  irregular  row;  segment  4  with  5  to  8  in  one  irregular  row;  segment  6  with  0 
to  4  in  one  regular  row;  segment  9  with  5  to  12  in  a  lateral  patch;  other  segments 
lacking  asperites. 

Spiracles:  Narrow  elongate,  nearly  parallel-sided;  thoracic  spiracle  4  to  5  times 
longer  than  wide;  abdominal  spiracles  2  to  3  times  longer  than  wide. 

Leg.  Pretarsus  54  to  %  length  of  tibio-tarsus,  claw  short,  slender,  arolium  present. 

This  description  is  from  specimens  bearing  the  same  data  as  the  6 
adult  paratypes  which  were  intercepted  in  Puerto  Rico. 

Appreciation  is  extended  to  T.  J.  Spilman  for  calling  the  adult  and 
larval  specimens  to  my  attention. 


Fall,  H. 
1905. 


Literature  Cited 


Revision  of  the  Ptinidae  of  Boreal  America. 
31:97-296. 


Trans.  Amer.  Ent.  Soc. 


64 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


BOOK  REVIEW 

KEYS  TO  THE  INSECTS  OF  THE  EUROPEAN  PARTS  OF  THE  U.S.S.R.  VOL. 
2,  COLEOPTERA  AND  STREPSIPTERA.  By  O.  Kryzhanovskij  and  others.  668 
pp.,  172  plates.  Moscow,  1965.  [In  Russian] 

The  first  of  five  volumes  on  the  insects  of  Russia  under  the  general  editorship  of 
G.  Y.  Bey-Bienko,  this  book  is  well  printed  and  bound.  Many  good  line  drawings 
and  habitus  sketches  serve  as  useable  illustrations.  The  format  is  simple,  consisting 
solely  of  keys  to  families,  genera,  and  species  after  a  short  introduction  to  beetle 
anatomy. 

The  text  states  that  there  are  20,000  species  of  beetles  recorded  from  all  of 
Russia  (including  Siberia),  but  fails  to  mention  the  total  number  included  in  this 
work.  It  is  presumed  to  be  complete  for  European  Russia,  but  the  fauna  seems  very 
limited  if  this  is  so.  Of  course,  European  Russia  does  not  have  the  variation  in  habitats 
that  we  are  used  to  in  this  country. 

The  keys  are  simple  and  compact,  made  possible  by  the  liberal  use  of  abbreviations 
as  is  the  European  tradition  in  faunal  works  of  this  sort.  Eighty-four  families  are 
included,  following  a  notably  conservative  classification.  Each  family  is  numbered 
and  a  brief  account  of  the  family  is  given  which  includes  habitat  information,  the 
approximate  number  of  species  in  the  area  covered  as  well  as  the  number  for  all 
of  Russia.  Except  for  the  large  families,  for  example,  Scarabaeidae,  no  keys  to 
the  subfamilies  of  tribes  are  included.  Separate  keys  to  genera  precede  the  generic 
treatment.  Each  genus  has  a  brief  account  and  the  number  of  species  that  occur  in 
all  of  Russia  is  given.  There  follows  a  key  to  the  species.  The  part  of  the  couplet 
leading  to  the  specific  name  contains  a  fuller  account  of  the  characters  of  the  species 
than  does  the  alternative.  Comments  on  the  habitats  of  larvae  and  adults  and  the 
distribution  of  the  species  is  also  included  in  this  part  of  the  couplet. 

A  limited  knowledge  of  the  language  and  the  fauna  prevents  me  from  commenting 
on  the  usefulness  of  the  book  or  the  number  of  errors.  I  have  only  two  criticisms: 
1 )  the  authors  did  not  attempt  to  bring  the  nomenclature  up  to  date,  2 )  no  refer¬ 
ences  or  bibliography  of  any  kind  appear  in  the  book.  There  are  not  even  references 
to  general  works  on  the  beetles  of  Russia.  However,  I  am  sure  the  book  has  a  very 
practical  value  to  those  working  with  this  fauna. — Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr.,  American 
Entomology  Institute. 


A  KEY  TO  THE  GENERA  OF  THE  SUBFAMILY  NITIDULINAE  (COLEOP¬ 
TERA:  NITIDULIDAE).  By  Lorin  R.  Gillogy.  Calif.  Dept,  of  Agric.,  Bur.  Ent. 
Occasional  Papers  No.  8,  24  pp.  1965. 

Coleopterists  wishing  to  do  taxonomic  studies  of  the  Nitidulidae  have  been  handi¬ 
capped  for  a  long  time  by  the  lack  of  adequate  diagnostic  tools.  There  are  relatively 
good  keys  for  the  fauna  of  the  Palearctic  and  Nearctic  Regions,  but  this  is  not  true 
of  the  rest  of  the  world.  Lorin  R.  Gillogly  has  a  project  underway  designed  to  alleviate 
this  situation.  The  first  publication  resulting  from  this  effort  was  released  in  Novem¬ 
ber  1965.  It  considers  the  largest  and  most  varied  of  the  five  subfamilies,  which 
it  indicates  contains  96  genera.  This  is  a  welcome  addition  to  the  literature  on 
Nitidulidae  and  it  is  hoped  that  this  project  will  soon  be  producing  additional 
material  of  this  nature. — W.  A.  Connell,  Univ.  of  Delaware,  Newark,  Delaware. 


NOTICE 

Mark  Robinson,  of  Philadelphia,  died  on  October  9,  1965.  A  man  of  broad  interests, 
he  is  best  known  among  coleopterists  for  his  work  on  the  Scarabaeidae. 

Charles  H.  Seevers,  of  Chicago,  died  on  December  4,  1965.  He  was  the  outstand¬ 
ing  authority  on  the  termitophilous  and  myrmecophilous  Staphylinidae. 

Harold  J.  Grant,  Jr.,  died  on  February  27,  1966.  Grant  was  known  to  all  sys- 
tematists  as  the  Curator  of  Insects  at  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia. 


—BACK  ISSUES— 

The  Coleopterists'  Bulletin 


Per 

Single 

Volume 

Issue 

Vol. 

3,  1949,  6  issues  (Nos.  i  &  2  o.p.; 

$5.00 

$1.00 

Vol. 

4,  1950,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol. 

5,  1951,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol. 

6,  1952,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol. 

7,  1953,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol. 

8,  1954,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol. 

9,  1955,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol. 

10,  1956,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol. 

11,  1957,  2  issues 

5.00 

3.00 

Vol. 

12,  1958,  1  issue 

5.00 

5.00 

Vol. 

13,  1959,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol. 

14,  1960,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol. 

15,  1961,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol. 

16,  1962,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol. 

17,  1963,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol. 

18,  1964,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol. 

19,  1965,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

(above  prices  Postpaid) 


. ATTENTION  READERS! . 

From  time  to  time  we  receive  requests  from  our  subscribers  who 
wish  to  complete  their  holdings  of  the  Bulletin.  We  would  appre¬ 
ciate  it  if  any  readers  possessing  copies  of  Vol.  3,  No.  1,  with  which 
they  are  willing  to  part,  would  inform  the  Bulletin. 


* 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 

620  Michigan  Avenue,  N.E. 
Washington,  D.  C.  20017 


Japanese  and  Formosan 


Coleoptera 


Price  list  on  request 


J.  Ohkura 


P.O.  Box  No.  2  Shakujii, 
Nerimaku,  Tokyo,  Japan. 


Now  in  its  38th  year — 

Anthropological  Quarterly 

(formerly  Primitive  Man) 

Issued  January,  April,  July  and  October 

<r*o 

Some  Recent  Contents: 

Grasshoppers  as  Food  in  Buhaya . P.  O.  Mors 

A  Pygmy  Group  Newly  Discovered  in  New  Guinea.  Martin  Gusinde 

Eskimo  Reindeer  Herding . Robert  T.  Anderson 

Rock  Paintings  of  South  Africa . Abbe  Henri  Breuil 

The  Assinboin  Horse  Medicine  Cult . John  C.  Ewers 

Treatment  of  Disease  in  the  New  Guinea  Highlands 

Louis  J.  Luzbetak 

(Articles  on  Physical  and  Cultural  Anthropology) 

Subscription  Price  $5.00  a  year  Single  Issues  $1.00 

Anthropological  Quarterly 

620  Michigan  Ave.,  N.E.  Washington,  D.  C.  20017 


COLEOPTERIS 


BULLETIN 


SEPTEMBER 


(No.  3)  1966 


BOSTRICHIDAE:  New  Xylothrips,  by  Reichardt  .  81 

CARABIDAE:  North  Dakota  larvae,  by  Dogger  &  Olson .  91 

CURCULIONIDAE :  Hylobius  review,  by  Warner  Jv.o.b. .  65 

CURCULIONIDAE:  On  Hypera  maritima,  by  Kissinger  : . .  90 

-  ■  •  •  ') 

LAMPYRIDAE:  On  Behavior,  by  Lloyd  .  84 

Beetle  Talk .  90 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS*  BULLETIN 

Founded  1947  by  Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr. 

The  Coleopterists’  Bulletin  is  published  by  The  Catholic  University  of  America 
Press,  Washington,  D.  C.  20017  and  edited  by  T.  J.  Spilman.  It  is  issued  four  times  a 
year  beginning  with  March.  All  business  matters  should  be  addressed  to  The  Cole- 
opterists’  Bulletin  at  the  Press.  Manuscripts  and  other  editorial  matter  should  be 
addressed  to  the  editor,  U.  S.  National  Museum,  Washington,  D.  C.  20560. 

Back  volumes:  A  stock  of  back  volumes 
is  maintained  and  may  be  purchased  as 
follows:  3  to  date,  $5.00  ea.;  single  num¬ 
bers,  $1.25  each;  all  prices  postpaid. 
Missing  numbers:  Issues  lost  in  the  mail 
will  be  supplied  free  of  charge  if  notified 
within  three  months  after  mailing. 


Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr.,  Ph.D. 

Department  of  Biology 
Catholic  University  of  America 

O.  L.  Cartwright 

U.  S.  National  Museum 
Washington,  D.  C.  20560 

Eugene  J.  Gerberg,  Ph.D. 

Insect  Control  and  Research,  Inc. 
Baltimore,  Md. 


EDITORIAL  BOARD 

James  A.  Magner,  Ph.D.,  S.T.D. 

Business  Manager  of  the  Bulletin 
Catholic  University  of  America 

Theodore  J.  Spilman 

U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture 
Washington,  D.  C.  20560 

Eileen  R.  Van  Tassell 

Department  of  Biology 
Catholic  University  of  America 


Subscriptions:  The  subscription  price  for 
each  annual  volume  of  four  numbers  is 
$5.00  payable  in  advance.  All  sub¬ 
scriptions  begin  with  the  first  issue  of 
the  year  and  those  subscribing  later  in 
the  year  will  receive  the  back  issues  of 
the  volume. 


NOTICE  TO  AUTHORS 


Manuscripts  will  be  considered  ONLY 
FROM  SUBSCRIBERS.  Authors  should 
consult  STYLE  MANUAL  FOR  BIO¬ 
LOGICAL  JOURNALS,  prepared  by  the 
Committee  on  Form  and  Style  of  the  Con¬ 
ference  of  Biological  Editors,  and  pub¬ 
lished  by  the  American  Institute  of  Bio¬ 
logical  Sciences,  2000  P  St.,  N.W.,  Wash¬ 
ington,  D.  C.  20006.  The  Bulletin  requires 
that  all  manuscripts  be  prepared  according 
to  instructions  in  the  Style  Manual.  Illus¬ 
trations  should  be  sent  mounted,  and 
numbered.  The  manuscript  should  be 
marked  to  indicate  the  location  of  text 
figures  or  the  position  of  full  page  plates. 

Manuscripts  will  be  acknowledged  upon 
receipt.  As  soon  as  possible  thereafter  the 
author  will  be  notified  as  to  acceptance 
after  review  by  the  Editorial  Board.  If 
the  manuscript  is  accepted,  a  tentative 
date  of  publication  will  be  set.  In  general, 


all  papers  will  be  published  in  their  order 
of  receipt,  but  the  editor  reserves  the  right 
to  use  articles  out  of  order  in  the  interest 
of  a  balanced  magazine. 

The  editor  will  make  no  text  changes 
without  advanced  notice  to  the  author. 
Galley  proof  will  be  sent  for  correction. 
These  galleys  are  sent  out  well  in  advance 
and  do  NOT  indicate  the  date  or  order  of 
publication. 

Twenty-five  tear  sheets  of  one  page 
notes  will  be  supplied  free  to  the  author  if 
requested  when  returning  galley  proofs. 
Reprints  of  articles  printed  free  of  extrane¬ 
ous  matter  will  be  supplied  with  or  with¬ 
out  covers  at  cost.  Reprints  MUST  be 
ordered  on  the  form  provided  when  re¬ 
turning  galley  proofs.  The  approximate 
cost  of  reprints  will  be  supplied  with  this 
form. 


; 


EDITORIAL  POLICY 

Any  article,  note,  or  news  items  likely  cases,  descriptions  of  new  species  must  be 
to  be  of  interest  to  readers  of  the  Bulletin  illustrated.  Descriptions  of  new  species  or 
wall  be  considered.  Articles  with  illustra-  genera  MUST  contain  keys  or  be  corre- 
tions  are  particularly  desired,  and  in  all  lated  with  existing  keys. 


A  QUARTERLY  PUBLICATION  DEVOTED  TO  THE  STUDY  OF  BEETLES 

The  Coleopterists’  Bulletin 


Volume  20 


September  (No.  3) 


1966 


A  REVIEW  OF  THE  HYLOBIUS  OF  NORTH  AMERICA, 
WITH  A  NEW  SPECIES  INJURIOUS  TO  SLASH  PINE 
(COLEOPTERA:  CURCULIONIDAE) 

By  Rose  Ella  Warner* 

Members  of  the  weevil  genus  Hylobius  are  of  economic  importance 
because  they  damage  trees.  This  review  of  the  North  American  species 
brings  together  and  summarizes  information  on  their  life  histories  and 
distribution  from  scattered  sources.  A  new  species  from  southeastern 
North  America  is  described,  and  keys  to  males  and  females  of  the  North 
American  species  are  presented. 


Hylobius  aliradicis  Warner,  NEW  SPECIES 
(Figs.  37,  38,  48) 

This  species  is  closely  related  to  Hylobius  rhizophagus  but  differs  in 
morphology  and  in  some  details  of  life  history.  I  am  describing  this 
apparently  native  Hylobius  from  adults  reared  from  larvae  found  in  slash 
pine,  Pinus  elliottii  Engelm.  The  larvae  were  found  in  tunnels  in  the  roots 
of  slash  pine  in  the  area  of  Homerville,  Georgia,  during  the  investigations 
into  the  cause  of  the  poor  condition  and  dying  of  slash  pine.  The  reared 
specimens  were  submitted  for  identification  by  Mr.  Bernard  H.  Ebel,  U.  S. 
Department  of  Agriculture  Forest  Sciences  Laboratory,  Athens,  Georgia. 

HOLOTYPE.  Female.  Length  10.4  mm.;  body  dark  brown;  coarsely 
punctured;  tan  setae  distributed  over  the  surface,  patches  of  coarse 
setae  more  dense  on  pronotum,  elytra,  and  laterally  on  visible  abdominal 
sterna  2,  3,  4,  and  5  and  medially  on  sterna  3  and  4,  scutellum  covered 
with  setae. 

HEAD.  Rostrum  feebly  arcuate,  0.9  mm.  wide  at  apex,  0.8  mm.  wide  at  base,  0.7 
mm.  wide  in  middle,  3.0  mm.  long  from  apex  to  interocular  fovea;  densely  punc¬ 
tured,  punctures  decreasing  distally,  large  coalescing  punctures  forming  shallow, 
lateral  grooves  in  front  of  eyes,  punctures  of  head  large,  separate;  vestiture  of 
rostrum  from  base  anteriorly  to  antennal  insertion  of  suberect,  curved,  tan  setae, 
thicker,  more  abundant,  and  less  curved  next  to  eyes  on  sides  of  interocular  fovea! 
from  antennal  insertion  to  apex  with  minute  setae  from  each  puncture,  vertex  with 
a  patch  of  coarse  setae;  antennal  segment  1  as  long  as  next  two  combined  (0.37 
mm.),  slightly  more  than  twice  as  long  as  wide  (0.37  mm.-0.16  mm.). 


1  Entomology  Research  Division,  Agricultural  Research  Service,  U.  S.  Depart¬ 
ment  of  Agriculture,  Washington,  D.  C. 


66 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


THORAX.  Pronotum  in  dorsal  view  wider  than  long  (3.0-2. 6  mm.);  punctation 
dense,  strigose  on  either  side  of  a  smooth  median  carina;  vestiture  of  coarse,  tan 
setae,  setae  coarser  laterally,  in  a  small  patch  medially  each  side  of  carina,  and  in 
front  of  scutellum.  Prosternum  with  coarse,  large  punctures,  apex  of  intercoxal 
process  densely  covered  with  appressed  orangish,  coarse  setae;  mesothoracic  and 
metathoracic  sterna  and  pleura  coarsely  punctured,  each  puncture  with  a  coarse 
tan  seta;  intercoxal  process  of  mesosternum  elevated,  apex  pointed,  densely  covered 
with  orange  setae;  scutellum  densely  covered  with  orange  setae. 

LEGS  Femora  with  large  tooth,  capped  with  a  tuft  of  setae;  each  puncture  with 
a  seta;  tibiae  straight  along  dorsal  border,  ventral  border  sinuate  and  carinate  near 
base,  a  row  of  setae  on  each  side  of  carina;  tarsi  normal. 

ELYTRA.  Length  7.3  mm.;  width  at  humeri  3.7  mm.;  vestiture  of  fine  and  coarse 
setae,  sutural  interval  flat,  more  finely  punctured,  other  intervals  coarsely  punctured. 
Elytron  at  half  length  with  coarse  setae  forming  diagonal  bars,  one  short,  directed 
anteriorly  toward  suture  and  extending  from  interval  10  to  7,  one  long,  directed 
posteriorly  toward  suture  and  extending  from  interval  7  to  2,  one  short,  directed 
anteriorly  toward  suture  and  extending  from  intersection  with  long  bar  at  interval 
4  to  2;  across  declivity  with  broad,  horizontal  bar  extending  from  interval  10  to  2, 
with  smaller,  short  bar,  directed  anteriorly  toward  suture  and  extending  from  inter¬ 
section  with  horizontal  bar  at  interval  4  to  2.  Bars  which  reach  interval  2  form 
diamond  at  half  length  and  triangle  across  top  of  declivity  on  middle  of  combined 
elytron.  Elytra  with  scattered  patches  of  setae  between  bars  but  not  forming  definite 
patterns. 

ABDOMEN.  1st  and  2nd  visible  abdominal  sterna  shiny,  finely  and  sparsely 
punctate,  posterior  half  of  2nd,  all  of  3rd,  4th,  and  5th  coriaceous,  not  as  shiny,  5th 
coarsely  densely  punctured,  laterally  impressed.  Each  puncture  with  seta,  setae 
broader,  thicker,  and  forming  patches  on  lateral  margins  of  sterna  1-5  and  medially 
on  sterna  3  and  4. 

TYPE  LOCALITY.  Homerville,  Georgia,  USA.  Collected  as  larvae  in 
the  roots  of  young  slash  pine  ( Pinus  elliottii  Engelm.),  October  23,  1964, 
by  Bernard  H.  Ebel.  Emerged  November  9,  1964,  USDA  Forestry  Sciences 
Laboratory,  Athens,  Georgia.  U.S.N.M.  type  number  69023. 

ALLOTYPE.  Male.  Slightly  larger  and  more  slender  than  holotype.  Patches  of 
setae  on  elytral  intervals  arranged  in  more  exact  bars  with  the  diamond  and  tri¬ 
angular  spaces  more  pronounced  than  in  holotype.  Rostrum  stouter.  First  and  2nd 
visible  abdominal  sterna  medially  concave,  5th  medially  impressed  with  fine  erect 
setae  in  the  impressed  area.  Collected  in  Athens,  Georgia,  10-19-43,  by  P.  W. 
Fattig.  This  specimen  was  selected  as  the  allotype  rather  than  one  from  the  reared 
material  from  which  the  holotype  was  selected  because  two  males  of  that  series  are 
ter.eral,  and  one  has  the  5th  visible  abdominal  sternum  very  convex  before  the 
impression.  The  three  male  specimens  from  a  third  series,  Hopkins  no.  45725, 
collected  in  1961,  were  used  in  genetic  studies  before  being  submitted  for  identifi¬ 
cation  and  are  in  very  poor  condition. 

PARATYPES.  Three  males,  Homerville,  Georgia,  August  31,  1961, 
collected  as  larvae  in  roots  of  4-year-old  slash  pine;  reared  at  Olustee, 
Florida,  November  25,  1961;  Hopkins  no.  45725.  Two  females  collected 
near  Homerville,  Georgia,  August  31,  1961,  as  larvae,  B.  H.  Ebel,  reared 
ex  2-  to  4-year-old  slash  pine  roots,  November  29,  1961;  Hopkins  no. 
45724.  Five  females  and  three  males,  Homerville,  Georgia,  October  23, 
1964,  B.  H.  Ebel,  in  roots  of  young  slash  pine,  emerged  November  4-9, 
1964,  at  Athens,  Georgia.  One  male,  Olustee,  Florida,  Baker  Co.,  April 
4-10,  in  pine  bolt  trap  with  H.  pales. 

Other  material  examined  includes  specimens  from  the  following  local¬ 
ities:  One  female  from  fruit  fly  trap,  1953,  C.  L.  Smith;  one  female,  Florida 
[probably  Valparaiso],  Wakely,  May  8,  1931,  injurious  to  Pinus  palustris 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


67 


Mills,  seedlings.  [ Pinus  palustris,  the  name  generally  accepted  for  longleaf 
pine,  is  the  name  used  by  Small  (1933)  and  others  for  slash  pine].  One 
female,  Hockly  [sic],  Texas,  I.  W.  Thuron.  Two  females,  Bolton,  North 
Carolina,  November  1965,  by  H.  Laymen;  Hopkins  no.  50506-F. 

H.  aliradicis  can  be  separated  from  the  other  Nearctic  species  of  Hylobius 
by  the  characters  in  the  key.  Two  characters,  the  shape  of  the  7th  tergum 
and  the  arrangement  of  the  stridulatory  tubercles  on  the  7th  tergum, 
not  previously  used  in  separating  the  species  of  Hylobius,  are  used  here. 
Although  the  number  of  tubercles  varies  to  a  considerable  degree  and  is 
unreliable  for  separating  the  species,  the  arrangement  of  the  tubercles  is 
of  taxonomic  value.  Only  in  pales  are  the  stridulatory  tubercles  arranged 
in  two  divergent  lines  and  not  intermingled  with  the  dense  split  setae 
covering  the  tergum  (fig.  5).  The  stridulatory  ridges  are  very  evident 
in  pales  and  can  be  seen  easily  with  low  magnification.  In  radicis, 
rhizophagus,  and  aliradicis  the  stridulatory  tubercles  are  intermixed  with 
the  vestiture  of  the  7th  tergum  and  are  not  easily  discernible.  In  pales 
and  congener  the  posterior  margin  of  the  7th  tergum  is  retuse  (figs.  5,  6); 
in  aliradicis  it  is  rounded  (fig.  9);  in  radicis  it  is  slightly  retuse  (fig.  7); 
and  in  rhizophagus  it  is  truncated  (fig.  8).  A  compound  microscope  was 
used  to  study  the  cleared  7th  tergum  mounted  in  glycerine. 

A  Key  to  the  Species  of  the  Nearctic  Hylobius  (Males) 

1.  Femoral  tooth  well  developed -  2 

Femoral  tooth  absent  or  inconspicuous -  6 

2.  Scutellum  glabrous  or  with  a  few  fine  setae;  basal  third  of  posterior  surfaces  of 

metafemur  medially  carinated  and  grooved;  ventral  edge  of  protibia  with  a  fringe 
of  long  white  setae;  apex  of  uncus  of  metatibia  broadly  rounded  (fig.  1);  stridula¬ 
tory  tubercles  on  7th  tergum  prominent  (fig.  6);  median  lobe  of  genitalia  as 

figured  (fig.  12);  length  6. 4-9.0  mm. - CONGENER 

Scutellum  covered  with  scale-like  setae;  metafemur  not  carinated  and  grooved; 
protibia  without  a  fringe  of  long  white  setae;  apex  of  uncus  of  metatibia  broadly 
rounded  or  acute  -  3 

3.  Apex  of  uncus  of  metatibia  broadly  rounded;  head  usually  with  a  patch  or  line  of 

broad  setae  on  vertex;  punctures  immediately  behind  interocular  fovea  coalescent, 
forming  short,  irregular  rugae;  stridulatory  tubercles  of  7th  tergum  in  2  very 
prominent  divergent  rows;  posterior  margin  of  7th  tergum  retuse  (fig.  5);  median 

lobe  of  genitalia  as  figured  (fig.  13);  length  5.8-11.3  mm. - PALES 

Apex  of  uncus  of  metatibia  acute  (figs.  2,  3,  4);  head  not  usually  with  a  patch 
or  line  of  broad  setae  on  vertex;  punctures  immediately  behind  interocular 
fovea  separated;  stridulatory  tubercles  on  7th  tergum  not  immediately  evident; 
posterior  margin  of  7th  tergum  retuse  or  not -  4 

4.  Body  dull  reddish  brown;  vestiture  of  fine  setae;  elytra  with  irregularly  placed  spots 

of  yellow  setae,  better  developed  on  even  intervals  and  rarely  forming  submedian 
or  subapical  bars,  the  general  effect  tessellate;  lateral  setae  on  visible  abdominal 
sterna  1-2  diffused,  not  condensed  into  spot;  stridulatory  tubercles  in  2  broken 
lines;  posterior  margin  of  7th  tergum  slightly  retuse  (fig.  17);  median  lobe 


of  genitalia  as  figured  (fig.  14);  length  9.7-12.0  mm. - RADICIS 

Body  black  or  piceous -  5 


5.  Body  shining  black;  antennae  and  tarsi  brown;  white  setae  distributed  on  surface, 
with  dense  patches  scattered  over  dorsal  surface  of  elytra,  fine  setae  below 
interocular  fovea  suberect;  stridulatory  tubercles  usually  in  2  broken  lines;  posterior 
margin  of  7th  tergum  more  or  less  truncate  (fig.  8);  median  lobe  of  genitalia  as 
figured  (fig.  15);  length  8.9-10.0  mm. - RHIZOPHAGUS 


2  In  all  previous  keys  this  surface  has  wrongly  been  referred  to  as  the  anterior 
surface. 


68 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


Body  piceous;  elytra  with  regularly  placed  spots  of  coarse  yellow  setae  forming  2 
prominent  bars,  one  diagonal,  directed  posteriorly  toward  suture  and  extending 
from  interval  7  to  2,  a  broad  horizontal  one  across  declivity  extending  from  in¬ 
terval  10  to  2,  stridulatory  tubercles  in  2  broken  lines;  posterior  margin  of  7th 
tergum  rounded  (fig.  9);  median  lobe  of  genitalia  as  figured  (fig.  16);  length  8.7- 

11.4  mm.  - ALIRADICIS 

6.  Femoral  tooth  absent  or  inconspicuous;  rostrum  rather  stout,  less  than  2.6  times 
as  long  as  wide,  noticeably  wider  distally;  apical  umbones  of  elytra  obscure  or 
entirely  undefined;  body  color  very  dark  brown  to  blackish,  with  white  to  pale 
yellow  slender  setae  forming  irregular  small  spots  on  elytra;  median  depression 
of  visible  abdominal  sterna  1-2  large,  deep;  metathoracic  wings  very  short,  not 
extending  beyond  the  posterior  margin  of  the  first  visible  abdominal  sternum; 

median  lobe  of  genitalia  as  figured  (fig.  10);  length  12.5-13.5  mm. - WARRENI 

Femoral  tooth  small  but  distinct;  rostrum  slender,  more  than  2.9  times  as  long  as 

wide,  not  wider  distally;  apical  umbones  of  elytra  prominent;  body  color  appears 
grayish,  with  indefinite,  almost  confluent  patches  of  white  or  yellowish  spots  of 
slender  setae  on  elytra;  median  depression  of  visible  abdominal  sterna  1-2 
small,  shallow;  metathoracic  wings  long,  extending  well  beyond  elytral  apex, 
median  lobe  of  genitalia  as  figured  (fig.  11);  length  10.7-13.2  mm. - PINICOLA 


A  Key  to  the  Species  of  Nearctic  Hylobius  (Females) 

1.  Femoral  tooth  well  developed -  2 

Femoral  tooth  absent  or  inconspicuous -  6 

2.  Scutellum  glabrous  or  with  a  few  fine  setae;  basal  third  of  posterior  surface  of 

metafemur  carinate  and  grooved;  spermatheca  and  8th  sternum  as  figured  (figs. 

22,  26);  length,  6. 5-9. 4  mm.  - CONGENER 

Scutellum  covered  with  scale-like  setae;  metafemur  not  carinate  and  grooved -  3 

3.  Body  black,  antennae  and  tarsi  dark  brown;  fine  white  setae  distributed  over  surface, 

with  dense  patches  scattered  irregularly  over  dorsal  surface  of  elytra;  pronotum 
with  median  smooth  carina  on  anterior  three-fourths;  very  fine  white  setae  present 
in  most  of  the  punctures;  patches  of  coarser  setae  on  both  sides  of  carina  and 

mediolaterally  on  sides  of  prothorax;  spermatheca  and  8th  sternum  as  figured 

(figs.  23,  29);  length,  9.8-11.6  mm. - RHIZOPHAGUS 

Body  brown  or  piceous  -  4 

4.  Body  brown;  vestiture  fine,  elytra  with  irregularly  placed  spots  of  pale  yellow  setae, 

better  developed  on  even  intervals  and  rarely  forming  submedian  or  subapical 
bars,  the  general  effect  tessellate;  lateral  setae  on  visible  abdominal  sterna 
diffused,  usually  not  condensed  into  spots;  spermatheca  and  8th  sternum  as  figured 

(figs.  19,  30);  length,  9.5-12.5  mm.  - RADICIS 

Body  piceous -  5 

5.  Rostrum  slender,  2.6  mm.,  very  little  wider  beyond  antennal  insertion;  punctures 

immediately  behind  interocular  fovea  separated;  rostral  setae  white,  conspicuous, 
dense,  suberect;  spermatheca  and  8th  sternum  as  figured  (figs.  17,  28);  length, 

9.5-12.8  mm.  - ALIRADICIS 

Rostrum  stout,  2.1  mm.,  noticeably  wider  beyond  antennal  insertion;  punctures  im¬ 
mediately  behind  interocular  fovea  coalescent,  forming  short,  irregular  rugae; 
rostral  setae  brownish,  not  very  conspicuous,  fine  (sometimes  coarser  near  inter¬ 
ocular  fovea),  sparse,  not  erect;  spermatheca  and  8th  sternum  as  figured  (figs.  21, 

27);  length,  7.4-10.3  mm. - PALES 

6.  Apical  umbones  of  elytra  obscure  to  entirely  undefined;  body  color  very  dark  brown 

to  blackish,  white  to  pale  yellow  setae  forming  irregular  small  spots  on  elytra; 
spermatheca  and  8th  sternum  as  figured  (figs.  20,  24);  length,  12.0-15.1  mm.  WARRENI 
Apical  umbones  of  elytra  prominent;  body  color  appears  grayish,  with  indefinite, 
almost  confluent  patches  of  white  or  yellow  spots  of  slender  setae;  spermatheca 
and  8th  sternum  as  figured  (figs.  18,  25);  length,  11.0-14.5  mm. - PINICOLA 


Because  three  species  that  attack  root  systems,  radicis,  rhizophagus,  and 
aliradicis,  are  so  similar,  the  following  table  (table  1)  of  contrasting  biolog¬ 
ical  data  will  be  helpful  in  separating  those  species. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


69 


Table  1.  Contrasting  Biological  Habits  of  Three  Morpho¬ 
logically  Similar  Species  of  Hylobius  that  Attack  Root  Systems 

rhizophagus3 4 

1.  Larvae  tunnel  in  roots 
from  smaller  end  towards 
base,  usually  found  in  roots 
under  half  inch  in  di¬ 
ameter;  pupation  occurs 
in  pupal  cells  in  the  roots. 

2.  Activity  of  insect  results 
in  very  light  resin  flow 
which  rarely  saturates  soil 
more  than  one  inch  away. 

3.  Adult  oviposition  site 
not  known,  but  circum¬ 
stantial  evidence  suggests 
the  region  of  the  root  tips. 

4.  Infests  primarily  closed 
plantations  of  pole-sized 
pines  on  formerly  culti¬ 
vated  land.  In  advanced 
infestations,  reproduction 
pines  may  also  be  infested. 


Hylobius  pales  (Herbst) 

(Figs.  34,  41) 

Curculio  pales  Herbst.  1797.  Natursyst.  Ins.  Kaf.  7:31. 

The  species  pales,  the  pales  weevil,  has  been  reported  feeding  on  a 
number  of  pines  ( Pinus )5  including  white  pine  (P.  strobus  L.),  pitch 
pine  (P.  rigidia  Mill.),  ponderosa  pine  (P.  ponderosa  Laws.),  mugho 
pine  (P.  mugo  Turra.),  Mexican  pinyon  pine  (P.  cembroides  Zucc.), 
Scotch  pine  (P.  sylvestris  L. ),  red  pine  (P.  resinosa  Ait.),  loblolly  pine 
(P.  taeda  L.),  shortleaf  pine  (P.  echinata  Mill.),  longleaf  pine  (P.  palus- 
tris  Mill.),  Austrian  pine  (P.  nigra  Arn.),  and  jack  pine  (P.  banksiana 
Lamb.).  White  pine  is  the  preferred  host  plant.  White  pine,  pitch  pine, 
ponderosa  pine,  mugho  pine,  and  Mexican  pinyon  pine  have  been  named 
specifically  as  probable  hosts  of  the  immature  stages  (Peirson,  1937; 
Wells,  1926).  In  southern  Ontario,  Canada,  adults  were  reared  from 
red,  jack,  scotch,  and  white  pine  (Finnegan,  1959).  Other  conifers  listed 
as  hosts  are  tamarack  (Larix  laricina  (Du  Roi)  Koch),  balsam  fir  (Abies 
balsamea  (L.)  Mill.),  red  spruce  ( Picea  rubra  (Du  Roi)  Dietr.),  Nor- 


3  Millers,  Benjamin,  and  Warner,  1963. 

4  Ebel,  personal  communication,  subject  to  modification  by  more  detailed  obser¬ 
vation. 

5  All  scientific  and  common  names  of  the  host  trees  were  checked  in  Little  (1953). 


radicis3 

1.  Larvae  tunnel  in  bark 
and  cambium  of  root  col¬ 
lar  region;  pupation  occurs 
in  nearby  soil.  Larvae 
found  not  more  than  12 
inches  from  root  collar. 

2.  Activity  of  insect  causes 
abundant  resin  flow  and 
root  collar  is  surrounded 
with  pitch-infiltrated,  black¬ 
ened  soil. 

3.  Adult  oviposition  in  or 
on  bark  in  root  collar  re¬ 
gion. 

4.  Infests  primarily  open¬ 
growing,  young  pines. 
Trees  over  1  inch  in  di¬ 
ameter  at  ground  line  are 
susceptible  to  attack. 


aliradicis’t 

1.  Larvae  tunnel  in  both 
lateral  roots  and  the  outer 
part  of  the  upper  tap  root, 
completely  boring  the 
smaller  roots  and  more  or 
less  spiraling  around  the 
larger  ones;  pupation  oc¬ 
curs  in  cells  in  the  roots, 
often  in  the  upper  tap  root 
area  under  the  bark. 

2.  Activity  of  the  insect 
results  in  moderate  resin 
flow  which  causes  the  soil 
to  adhere  loosely  in  the 
infested  roots. 

3.  Oviposition  site  un¬ 
known;  association  of  in¬ 
festation  with  pine  roots 
in  loose  soil  suggests  the 
upper  tap  root  area  as  a 
logical  oviposition  site. 

4.  Infests  young  pines,  pen¬ 
cil-sized  to  about  2  inches 
in  root  collar  diameter;  as¬ 
sociated  with  young  pines 
growing  in  loose  soil. 


70 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


way  spruce  ( P .  abies  (L.)  Karst.),  eastern  hemlock  ( Tsuga  canadensis 
(L.)  Carr.),  Douglas  fir  ( Pseudotsuga  menziesii  (Mirb.)  Franco),  east¬ 
ern  red  cedar  ( Juniperus  virginiana  L.),  common  juniper  (/.  communis 
L.),  Arizona  cypress  ( Cupressus  arizonica  Green),  northern  white- 
cedar  ( arborvitae )  ( Thuja  occidentalis  L.),  as  well  as  gray  birch  {Betula 
alleghaniensis  Britton)  and  white  ash  ( Fraxinus  americana  L.)  (Carter, 
1916;  Peirson,  1921). 

The  adults  hibernate  beneath  stones,  in  litter,  or  in  soil  at  the  base 
of  the  seedlings,  becoming  active,  depending  on  the  locality  and  altitude, 
from  April  to  June,  during  which  time  they  feed  on  the  tender  bark  of  the 
twigs  of  saplings  and  at  the  base  of  seedlings.  The  eggs  are  laid  singly, 
in  the  inner  bark  of  freshly  cut  pine  logs  or  the  roots  of  freshly  cut  pine 
stumps.  They  hatch  in  about  two  weeks.  Larvae  feed  for  about  two  weeks 
in  the  cambial  area  of  the  roots  and  stumps.  They  pupate  in  “chip 
cocoons”  constructed  in  the  stump  lying  below  the  surface  and  in  the 
root  system  where  roots  are  over  one-quarter  of  an  inch  in  diameter. 
The  new  adults  emerge  in  about  a  month,  and  it  is  at  this  time  they 
feed  on  the  pine  seedlings.  H.  pales  is  typically  a  nocturnal  feeder.  The 
susceptibility  of  the  young  seedlings  seems  to  depend  upon  the  nature 
of  the  bark,  those  seedlings  having  relative  thin,  tender  bark,  being  favored 
for  food.  Injury  likely  to  cause  death  is  confined  to  trees  under  three  feet 
in  height.  In  southern  Ontario,  Canada,  H.  pales  is  associated  mostly 
with  Christmas  tree  plantations  where  selective  cutting  is  practiced  and 
a  continuous  supply  of  breeding  material  is  available.  (Beal  and  McClin- 
tock,  1943;  Carter,  1916;  Finnegan,  1959;  Peirson,  1921;  and  Wells, 
1926). 

DISTRIBUTION0  (fig.  45):  Hylobius  pales  is  found  in  most  of  the  eastern  half 
of  the  United  States  from  Maine  to  Florida  and  west  to  Texas  and  in  Canada  from 
Nova  Scotia  to  Manitoba.  MAINE:  Cumberland  Co.;  Kittery  Point;  Mt.  Katahdin, 
Camp  Kennedy.  NEW  HAMPSHIRE:  Canbie  Lake;  Durham;  White  Mts.;  Webster; 
Manchester.  CONNECTICUT:  Stamford.  VERMONT:  Brattleboro.  MASSACHU¬ 
SETTS:  Springfield;  Cambridge;  Chicopee;  Petersham;  Berlin;  Stoughton;  Hum- 
merock;  Tynsboro;  North  Saugus;  Ipswich;  Marshfield;  Framington.  RHODE 
ISLAND:  Watch  Hill.  NEW  YORK:  Bellport;  Long  Island;  Greenwood  Lake; 
Cranberry  Lake;  West  Point;  Haverhill;  Islip;  Buffalo;  Ithaca;  Albany;  Ballston 
Spa.  NEW  JERSEY:  Malaga;  Seaside  Hts.;  Greenwood  Lake;  Lakehurst;  Newark; 
Ocean  City;  Orange;  Barnegat;  Bayhead;  New  Lisbon;  Rancocas  Park;  Whitesbag. 
MARYLAND:  Beltsville;  Berwyn  Heights;  Piney  Point;  Bladensburg;  Hagerstown; 
Hyattsville;  Plum  Point;  Plummers  Island;  Bethesda;  Branchville.  WEST  VIRGINIA: 
Driscoll;  White  Sulphur  Springs;  Kanawha  Station.  VIRGINIA:  Mount  Vernon; 
Falls  Church;  Rosslyn;  Warrenton;  Chester;  Nelson  Co.;  St.  Elmo;  Maywood; 
Bostin;  Bland  Co.;  King  and  Queen  Co.;  Ft.  Monroe;  Herndon.  NORTH  CARO¬ 
LINA:  Durham;  Southern  Pines;  Ellenboro;  Tyron;  Biltmore;  Atkinson;  Mount 
Mitchell;  Black  Mts.;  Asheville;  Raleigh;  Roundtop;  Pisgah  Ridge;  Pink  Beds;  Beau¬ 
fort.  GEORGIA:  Clayton;  Miller;  Richmond  Hill;  Thomasville;  Homerville.  SOUTH 
CAROLINA:  Myrtle  Beach;  Florence;  Fort  Mill;  Clemson.  FLORIDA:  Palatka; 
St.  Nicholas;  Orange  Co.;  Lake  City;  Foley;  Villa  Tassa;  Key  West;  Olustee,  Baker 
Co.;  Valparaiso.  ALABAMA:  Birmingham;  Montgomery;  Lamar;  Lasca;  Mobile; 
Jena.  LOUISIANA:  Bogalusa;  Hodge;  Sardis.  MISSISSIPPI:  Saucier;  Meridian; 
Gulfport;  Paris;  Durant;  A&M  College.  ARKANSAS:  Crossed;  Benton;  Hot 
Springs;  Star  City;  Kingsland.  TEXAS:  Call;  Deweyville;  Nacogdoches.  MISSOURI: 


6  From  specimens  in  the  Canadian  National  Collection  and  the  United  States 
National  Museum  Collection  unless  otherwise  stated. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


71 


St.  Louis.  WISCONSIN:  Sparta;  Cranmoor,  Wood  Co.  OHIO:  Hocking  Co.  MICHI¬ 
GAN:  Port  Huron.  MINNESOTA:  Bemidji;  Itasca  Park;  Collegeville.  PENNSYL¬ 
VANIA:  State  College;  Morrisville;  Glenside;  Lehigh  Gap;  Holiday;  Twin  Lakes; 
Monroe  Co.  DISTRICT  OF  COLUMBIA:  Rock  Creek  [Park].  CANADA.  QUE¬ 
BEC:  Norway  Bay;  Ft.  Coulonge;  Covey  Hill;  Montreal;  Wright.  ONTARIO: 
Marmora;  Petawawa;  Go  Home  Bay;  Maple;  Kerr  Lake;  now  occurring  (Finnegan, 
1959)  in  epidemic  numbers  in  Simcoe  Co.,  Durham  Co.,  and  generally  in  the  area 
west  of  a  line  drawn  through  Port  Severn  and  Trenton;  Ottawa;  Constance  Lake; 
Grand  Bend;  Mount  Hope. 


Hylobius  pinicola  (Couper) 

(Fig.  32) 

Curculio  pinicola  Couper,  1864.  Trans.  Lit.  Hist.  Soc.  Quebec,  n.s. 
2:65. 

Larvae  of  this  species  attack  the  root  systems  of  most  coniferous  trees, 
including  members  of  the  genera  Pinus,  Abies,  and  Larix,  specifically 
tamarack  (eastern  larch)  ( Larix  laricina  (DuRoi)  K.  Koch)  and  white 
spruce  ( Picea  glauca  (Moench)  Voss)  when  they  occur  on  moist  to  wet 
sites.  (Wood,  1957;  Warren,  1960). 

DISTRIBUTION6  (fig.  43):  CANADA:  NEWFOUNDLAND:  St.  John;  Port 
au  Basque.  LABRADOR:  Cartwright;  George  River.  NEW  BRUNSWICK:  Bathurst. 
QUEBEC:  Perce;  Natashquan;  Little  Mecatina  Is.;  Knob  Lake;  Chicoutimi;  Mont¬ 
morency;  Gaspe;  Trinity  Bay;  Abitibi;  Great  Whale  River;  Cascapedia.  ONTARIO: 
Petawawa;  Stittsville;  Sudbury.  MANITOBA:  Awame;  Churchill;  Onah.  SAS¬ 
KATCHEWAN:  Prince  Albert;  Christopher  Lake;  Dorentosh.  ALBERTA:  Mitsue 
BRITISH  COLUMBIA:  Dome  Creek.  YUKON  TERRITORY:  Swin  Lakes. 
UNITED  STATES:  MAINE:  East  Branch;  Center  Mt.;  Chesuncook;  Kennedy 
Camp,  Mt.  Katahdin.  VERMONT:  Mt.  Mansfield.  NEW  HAMPSHIRE:  Carter 
Dome,  White  Mts.  NEW  YORK:  White  Face  Mt.  Trail;  Top  of  Slide  Mountain, 
Ulster  Co.;  Mt.  Marcy;  Ithaca.  MICHIGAN:  Marquette;  Grand  Isle;  Seney.  WIS¬ 
CONSIN:  Cranmoor,  Wood  Co.;  Mamie  Lake.  NORTH  CAROLINA:  Mount 
Mitchell,  Black  Mts. 


Figures  1-4,  Hylobius  spp.,  metatibial  unci  of  males.  1 — congener  and  pales. 

2 — radicis.  3 — rhizophagus.  4 — aliradicis. 


Figures  5-9,  Hylobius  spp.,  dorsal  view  of  7th  tergum  of  males.  Dotted  lines 
represent  arrangement  of  stridulatory  tubercles.  5 — pales.  6 — congener.  7 — 
radicis.  8 — rhizophagus.  9 — aliradicis. 


72 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


Figures  10-16,  Hylobius  spp.,  median  lobe  of  male  genitalia,  top  row,  dorsal  view; 
middle  row,  ventral  view;  bottom  row,  lateral  view.  10 — warreni.  11 — pinicola. 
12 — congener.  13 — pales.  14 — radicis.  15 — rhizophagus.  16 — aliradicis. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


73 


Hylobius  congener  Dalla  Torre,  Schenkling,  and  Marshall 

(Fig.  33) 

Hylobius  congener  Dalla  Torre,  Schenkling,  and  Marshall,  1932. 
Coleopterorum  Catalogus,  pars  122:15. 

Hosts:  Red  pine  ( Pinus  resinosa  Ait.),  white  pine  (P .  strobus  L.), 
and  Scotch  pine  (P.  sylvestris  L.).  The  following  is  from  Martin  (1964). 
The  adults  deposit  their  eggs  singly  in  the  shallow  cavities  excavated 
in  the  bark  of  logs  and  stumps,  usually  at  the  margin  of  branch  or 
mechanical  scars  and  often  at  the  end  of  logs.  The  entrances  to  the 
cavities  are  filled  with  bark  chips  and  frass.  Oviposition  begins  during 
the  last  week  of  May  and  continues  into  June.  The  eggs  hatch  in  about 
10  days.  Newly  hatched  larvae  excavate  small  irregular  cavities  in  the 
bark  at  the  oviposition  site.  Second  instar  larvae  begin  more  or  less 
regular  tunnels  following  the  grain  of  the  wood.  Feeding  is  restricted  to 
the  phloem,  and  brown  frass  fills  the  tunnel  behind  the  larvae.  The  larvae 
reach  maturity  in  about  65  to  70  days.  After  feeding  is  completed,  the 
larvae  begin  to  excavate  pupal  pits.  They  tear  out  coarse  wood  chips 
and  make  short  tunnels,  about  5  mm.  in  depth,  at  right  angles  to  the 
surface  of  the  wood.  At  this  depth,  the  larvae  turn  at  right  angles  again 
and  excavate  their  pupal  cells  parallel  to,  but  several  millimeters  below, 
the  surface  of  the  wood.  The  wood  chips  are  packed  with  frass  in  the 
old  feeding  tunnels.  The  larvae  enter  the  prepupal  stage  from  mid-August 
until  late  September  and  remain  in  this  stage  throughout  the  winter. 
After  emergence  from  the  pupal  cells  during  late  July  and  August,  the 
adults  feed  on  the  inner  bark  of  logs  and  slash.  After  feeding  intermit¬ 
tently  for  several  weeks,  they  enter  the  duff  and  overwinter.  The  weevils 
come  out  of  the  litter  the  following  spring  about  mid-May  and  resume 
feeding.  A  flight  period  of  one  to  two  weeks  occurs  at  this  time.  Follow¬ 
ing  the  flight  period,  breeding  begins,  and  the  adults  adopt  a  nocturnal 
habit  and  travel  mostly  by  crawling  on  the  ground. 


DISTRIBUTION6  (fig.  44):  CANADA:  LABRADOR:  Goose  Bay.  NEW¬ 
FOUNDLAND:  Gander;  Corner  Brook.  NOVA  SCOTIA:  Kentville;  South  Ohio; 
Yarmouth;  Dartmouth;  Beaver  Bank;  Wayerley;  Grosses  Goques;  Halifax;  Parrs- 
boro;  Pt.  Maitland.  NEW  BRUNSWICK:  French  Lake;  New  Castle;  Bathurst; 
Tabusintac.  QUEBEC:  Duparquet;  Ft.  Coulonge;  Indian  House  Lake;  Hemming- 
ford-  Mistassini  Lake;  Seven  Isle;  Mt.  Laval;  Wright;  Cascapedia;  Gaspe;  Forest- 
ville;  Knob  Lake;  Laniel;  Bradore  Bay;  Natashquan;  Trinity  Bay;  Thunder  River; 
Duchesnay;  lie  Montreal;  Mt.  St.  Hilaire;  Great  Whale  River;  Aylmer.  ONTARIO: 
One  Side  Lake;  Ojibway;  Ottawa;  Arnprior;  Constance  Bay;  Kerr  Lake;  Dryden; 
Petawawa;  Ogoki;  Sudbury;  Frater;  Trentor;  Algoma  District  (Martin,  1962).  MANI¬ 
TOBA:  The  Pas;  Makinak;  Rennie;  Riverton;  Pine  Falls.  SASKATCHEWAN: 
Prince  Albert.  ALBERTA:  McMurray;  Edmonton.  BRITISH  COLUMBIA:  Inver¬ 
ness*  Massed,  Queen  Charlotte  Island;  Vancouver;  Trinity  Valley.  NORTHWEST 
TERRITORIES:  Fort  Smith.  UNITED  STATES:  MAINE:  Passadunkeag;  Cum¬ 
berland  Co.  NEW  HAMPSHIRE:  Pike;  White  Mts.;  Rumney;  Hampton;  Mt.  Wash¬ 
ington.  VERMONT:  Brattleboro.  RHODE  ISLAND:  Watch  Hill.  MASSACHU¬ 
SETTS:  East  Otis;  Framington;  Ipswich.  NEW  YORK:  Cranberry  Lake;  Peru, 
Clinton  Co.;  Buffalo;  Ithaca;  Greene  Co.  NEW  JERSEY:  Menantico;  Newark. 
MICHIGAN:  Agri.  College;  Marquette;  Port  Huron;  Escanaba;  Eagle  Harbor; 
Michipicten.  WISCONSIN:  Oshkosh;  Apostle  Island;  Lake  St.  Germaine;  Bayfield; 
Iron  River  MINNESOTA:  Lake  Itasca  Park;  Two  Harbors;  Duluth;  Little  Winne- 
begosish.  ALASKA:  Ft.  Wrangle.  NORTH  CAROLINA:  Mt.  Guyot,  Great  Smoky 

Mts. 


74 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


Hylobius  radicis  Buchanan 
(Figs  35,40) 

Hylobius  radicis  Buchanan,  1935.  Proc.  Ent.  Soc.  Wash.  36(8-9)  1934 
[1935]:252 

The  species  radicis,  the  pine  root-collar  weevil,  attacks  the  root  crown 
of  living  Scotch  pine  ( Pinus  sylvestris  L.),  Austrian  pine  (P.  nigra  Arn.), 
lodgepole  pine  (P.  contorta  Dough),  Corsican  pine  (P.  nigra  poiretiana 
Schneid),  eastern  white  pine  (P.  strobus  L.),  Mugho  pine  (P.  mugo 
Turra.),  jack  pine  (P.  banksiana  Lamb.),  pitch  pine  (P.  rigida  Mill.), 
and  red  pine  (P.  resinosa  Ait.).  The  adults  that  hibernate  resume  activity 
early  in  the  spring.  They  feed  at  night  on  the  inner  bark  of  the  trunk  in 
the  vicinity  of  the  root  collar  and  the  tree  crown  where  they  eat  the 
tender  bark  of  twigs  and  small  branches.  The  eggs  are  placed  in  the 
adult  feeding  wounds  in  the  inner  bark  of  the  root  collar  but  often  are 
laid  in  the  soil  as  far  as  two  inches  from  the  tree.  Larvae  are  found  not 
more  than  twelve  inches  from  the  root  collar.  Larvae  tunnel  in  the  bark 
and  cambium  of  the  root  collar  region  at  or  below  the  ground  level 
completely  girdling  the  trunk  and  also  basal  portions  of  the  large  lateral 
roots.  Activity  of  the  insect  causes  abundant  resin  flow,  and  the  root 
collar  is  surrounded  with  pitch-infiltrated,  blackened  soil.  A  layer  of 
pitch-infiltrated  soil  2-3  inches  thick  may  form  near  the  feeding  area. 


Figures  17-23,  Hylobius  spp.,  spermatheca.  17 — aliradicis.  18 — pinicola.  19 
— radicis.  20 — warreni.  21 — pales.  22 — congener.  23 — rhizophagus. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


75 


Pupation  occurs  in  the  tunnels  in  the  pitch-saturated  soil  or  in  enlarged 
cells  in  the  bark  of  the  root  collar  of  the  infested  trees;  the  pupal  cells 
are  not  lined  with  shredded  wood  fibers  such  as  are  characteristic  of 
the  pupal  cells  of  the  pales  weevil.  The  weevil  overwinters  in  the 
adult  and  larval  stages  and  occasionally  in  the  pupal  stage.  Adults  that 
emerge  late  in  the  summer  hibernate  in  the  duff  or  litter  under  the  trees. 
The  larvae  that  have  hibernated  pupate  and  emerge  in  July  and  August. 
In  Ontario,  Canada,  eggs  laid  early  in  the  spring  may  produce  adults 
in  late  September,  but  eggs  laid  during  the  remainder  of  the  growing 
season  produce  larvae  that  overwinter  and  pupate  the  following  July. 
The  weevil  infests  primarily  open-growing  young  pines,  the  larvae  rather 
than  the  adults  causing  the  severe  injury,  and  large  as  well  as  small  trees 
are  attacked.  (Finnegan,  1962;  Millers,  Benjamin,  Warner,  1963;  Warren, 
1956b;  Schaffner  and  McIntyre,  1944;  Wallace,  1954.) 

DISTRIBUTION0  (fig.  46):  UNITED  STATES:  NEW  YORK:  Ballston  Spa, 
Saratoga  Co.;  Albany;  Glen  Head,  Long  Island;  Sea  Cliff.  CONNECTICUT:  New 
Canaan;  Greenwich;  Stamford;  Old  Lyme;  New  London.  MASSACHUSETTS:  Wes¬ 
ton  MICHIGAN:  Muskegon  Co.  MINNESOTA:  Cass  Lake.  KENTUCKY:  Boone- 
ville.  WISCONSIN:  Glacial  Lake,  Adams  Co.,  (Brown  and  Young,  1955).  CANADA: 
(Elliott  and  Hildahl,  1961;  Sipple,  MacDonald,  and  Rose,  1961).  ONTARIO: 
Simcoe  Co.;  Lake  Simcoe  District;  Westmeath  Township,  Pembroke  District; 
McAuley  Township,  Parry  Sound  District;  Essa  Township;  Sunmdale  Township; 
Tosorontio  Township;  Tiny  Township;  Gibson;  Balm  Beach  W.  of  Penetanguishene, 
W.  of  Barrie;  Angus  area.  MANITOBA:  Sandilands  Forest  Reserve,  Renfrew  Co.; 
Sault  Ste.  Marie. 


Hylobius  warreni  Wood 
(Fig.  31) 

Hylobius  warreni  Wood,  1957.  Canadian  Ent.  89(1). 40. 

This  species  attacks  the  inner  bark  and  cambium  of  the  root  systems 
of  coniferous  trees.  Among  the  hosts  are  white  spruce  {Pice a  glauca 
(Moench)  Voss),  Scotch  pine  {Pinus  sylvestris  L.),  jack  pine  (P.  banks- 
iana  Lamb.),  lodgepole  pine  (P.  contorta  Dougl.),  white  pine  (P.  strobus 
L.),  red  pine  (P.  resinosa  Ait.),  western  white  pine  (P.  monticola 
Dough),  balsam  fir  {Abies  balsamea  (L.)  Mill.),  alpine  fir  {A.  lasiocarpa 
(Hook)  Nutt.),  tamarack  (eastern  larch)  {Larix  laricina  (DuRoi)  k. 
Koch),  Norway  spruce  {Picea  rubens  Sarg.)  and  black  spruce  (P.  mariana 
(Mill.)  B.S.P.).  (Wood,  1957;  Warren,  1956a;  Warren,  1960). 

The  adults  feed  on  the  bark  of  small  roots  and  twigs  and  on  the 

needles  of  the  host,  but  the  most  serious  damage  is  caused  by  the  larvae. 

The  newly  hatched  larvae  bore  into  the  bark  and  along  the  cambium 

of  roots  and  root  collars  of  the  host.  This  boring  causes  resinosis, 

producing  noticeable  exudations  similar  to  the  pitch  tubes  formed  by 
scolytids.  Using  the  exudation,  a  feeding  larva  forms  a  tube-like  cover¬ 
ing.  This  covering  increases  in  size  and  hardness  as  the  larvae  grows.  A 
number  of  mature  larvae,  feeding  close  together,  usually  cause  a  copious 
resin  flow  and  a  solid  mass  of  hardened  tubes.  (Warren,  1956a) 

Boring  larvae  may  be  found  either  on  roots  or  root  collars  but 
appear  to  prefer  root  crotches.  Small  trees  may  be  completely  girdled 


76 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


at  the  collar,  but  their  main  roots  may  be  girdled  or  severely  debarked 
at  or  adjacent  to  crotches.  A  root  is  considered  susceptible  to  attack 
when  it  is  more  than  one  inch  in  diameter  at  the  base.  When  larger  roots 
of  a  tree  are  4  or  5  inches  in  diameter  at  the  base,  the  distal  portions 
less  than  2  inches  in  diameter  are  seldom  damaged.  Roots  smaller  than 
2  inches  on  a  larger  tree  are  usually  free  from  attack.  The  degree  of 
insect  damage  is  related  to  differences  in  the  moisture  content  of  sites. 
Damage  is  greater  when  the  trees  occur  on  wet  or  moist  sites.  (Warren, 
1956a.) 

DISTRIBUTION6  (fig.  42):  CANADA:  MANITOBA:  Clear  Lake  Trail,  Riding 
Mountain  National  Park;  Pine  Falls;  Wasagaming;  Winnipeg.  ALBERTA:  Cold 
Lake;  Colinton;  Strachan;  Cypress  Hills  (near  Robb)  (Brown,  Robins,  and  Steven- 


Figures  24-30,  Hylobius  spp.,  8th  sterna  of  females.  24 — warreni.  25 — 
pinicola.  26 — congener.  27 — pales.  28 — aliradicis.  29 — rhizophagus.  30 — 
radicis. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


77 


son,  1961).  BRITISH  COLUMBIA:  Mi.  65  Alaska  Highway;  Golden;  McLeod 
Meadows  in  Kootenay  Park;  Longworth;  Summit  Lake,  Prince  George;  Fish  Trap 
Creek,  Barriere.  NEW  BRUNSWICK:  Nashwaaksis.  NOVA  SCOTIA:  Little  River; 
Manchester;  Halifax.  ONTARIO:  Chapeau;  Cochrane;  Moose  Factory;  Cobalt. 
QUEBEC:  Anse  St.  Jean;  Baie  St.  Paul;  Cascapedia;  Gaspe  County;  Islet  Caribou; 
Laniel;  Macamic;  Maniwaki;  Parke  Reserve;  Riviere  Musquoro;  Sanaur  [Sanmovy]; 
St.  Vianney;  Trios  Pistoles;  Temiscaming;  Trinity  Bay,  Abitibi.  NEWFOUNDLAND: 
Burin  Peninsula,  Salmonier  Line  (prob.  this  species,  Carroll  and  Parrott,  1961). 
UNITED  STATES:  MAINE:  Bridgewater;  Danforth;  Rangeley;  Seboomook;  St. 
Francis;  Sorrento;  Capsuptic.  MICHIGAN:  Marquette;  Vermilion.  NEW  YORK: 
Raybrook;  Wallface  Mt.;  Essex  Co.  NORTH  CAROLINA:  Black  Mountain. 


Figures  31-37,  Hylobius  spp.  31 — warreni.  32 — pinicola.  33 — congener. 

34 — pales.  35 — radicis.  36 — rhizophagus.  37 — aliradicis. 

Figures  38-41,  Hylobius  spp.,  pronotum.  38 — aliradicis.  39 — rhizophagus. 
40 — radicis.  41 — pales. 


78 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


Figures  42-48,  Hylobius  spp.,  distribution  maps.  42 — warreni.  43 — pinicola. 
44 — congener.  45 — pales.  46 — radicis.  47 — rhizophagus.  48 — aliradicis. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


79 


Hylobius  rbizophagus  Millers,  Benjamin,  and  Warner 

(Figs.  36,  39) 

Hylobius  rhizophagus  Millers,  Benjamin,  Warner,  1963.  Canadian  Ent. 

95(1) : 18. 

This  species,  the  “root  tip  weevil,”  attacks  the  roots  of  jack  pine 
( Pinus  banksiana  Lamb.),  red  pine  (P.  resinosa  Ait.),  and  Scotch  pine 
(P.  sylvestris  L.).  Roots  of  seedlings  are  tunneled  by  larvae  which  leave 
behind  tightly  packed  frass  enclosed  by  the  scaly  sheath  of  the  root.  On 
larger  pines,  lateral  roots  are  sometimes  tunneled.  Frequently,  all  roots  in 
the  upper  foot  of  soil  and  beyond  a  6  foot  radius  are  damaged.  Weevil 
larvae  tunnel  in  the  proximal  ends  of  the  roots,  with  the  frass  tunnels 
extending  to  the  root  tips.  Hence  the  weevil  is  referred  to  by  the  com¬ 
mon  name,  “root  tip  weevil.”  Activity  of  the  insect  results  in  very  light 
resin  flow,  which  rarely  saturates  soil  more  than  an  inch  away.  Larvae 
overwinter  in  the  roots  and  resume  feeding  the  following  spring.  Pupa¬ 
tion  takes  place  in  early  August  within  pupal  cells  constructed  in  the 
roots.  Adults  emerge  a  few  weeks  later  and  feed  on  the  lateral  branches. 
Root  tip  weevil  eggs  are  slightly  smaller  than  the  eggs  of  the  pine  root- 
collar  weevil.  The  species  infests  primarily  closed  plantations  of  pole¬ 
sized  pines  in  formerly  cultivated  land.  In  advanced  infestations,  repro¬ 
duction  pines  may  also  be  infested.  Larvae  were  reported  leading  to 
the  death  of  3-foot  red  pines  planted  among  older  jack  pines.  (Millers, 
Benjamin,  1961;  Millers,  Benjamin,  and  Warner,  1963). 

DISTRIBUTION6  (fig.  47):  WISCONSIN:  Lone  Rock,  Sauk  Co.;  Big  Flats, 
Adams  Co.;  Wild  Rose,  Waushara  Co.;  Black  River  Falls,  Jackson  Co.  MICFIIGAN: 
Alcona  Co.  (larvae  only,  Anonymous,  1965). 


Acknowledgments 

My  special  thanks  are  extended  to  Bernard  H.  Ebel,  USDA  Forest  Science  Labora¬ 
tory,  Athens,  Georgia,  for  providing  the  reared  and  collected  specimens  of  the  type 
series  of  a  new  species  and  for  the  biological  data  pertaining  to  it.  I  wish  to  thank 
Dr.  Edward  C.  Becker,  Canada  Department  of  Agriculture,  Research  Branch.  Ento¬ 
mology  Research  Institute,  Ottawa,  Canada,  for  supplying  the  distribution  data  of 
the  Hylobius  specimens  in  the  Canadian  National  Collection.  The  photographs  are 
the  special  work  of  Dr.  David  G.  Kissinger,  Atlantic  Union  College,  South  Lan¬ 
caster,  Massachusetts,  who  so  generously  gave  of  his  time  during  one  of  his  visits 
to  the  U.  S.  National  Museum  to  study  Apion.  My  thanks  go  also  to  Mr.  Elbert  L. 
Little,  Jr.,  Forester,  Division  of  Dendrology  and  Range  Forage  Investigations,  U.  S. 
Forest  Service,  for  help  with  the  scientific  and  common  names  of  the  host  trees. 


Literature  Cited 

Anonymous 

1965.  U.  S.  Dept.  Agri.  Coop.  Econ.  Ins.  Rept.  15(26)  :689. 

Beal,  J.  A.,  and  K.  B.  McClintock. 

1943.  The  pales  weevil  in  southern  pines.  J.  Econ.  Ent.  36(5) : 792-794. 

Brown,  C.  E.,  J.  K.  Robins,  and  R.  E.  Stevens 

1961.  Province  of  Alberta,  For.  Ins.  Surv.  Cand.  Dept.  For.  Ann.  Rept.  For. 
Ins.  Disease  Surv.  pp.  92-101. 


80 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


Brown,  R.  T.,  and  E.  P.  Young 

1955.  Insect  attacks  on  native  and  plantation  pines  in  Central  Wisconsin. 
Ecology  36(3) : 522-523 . 

Carroll,  W.  J.,  and  W.  C.  Parrott 

1961.  Providence  of  Newfoundland,  For.  Ins.  Surv.,  Canad.  Dept.  For.  Ann. 
Rept.  For.  Ins.  Disease  Surv.  pp.  9-16. 

Carter,  E.  E. 

1916.  Hylobius  pales  as  a  factor  in  the  reproduction  of  conifers  in  New 
England.  Proc.  Soc.  Amer.  Foresters  1 1  (2)  :297-307. 

Elliott,  K.  R.,  and  V.  Hildahl 

1961.  Province  of  Manitoba  and  Saskatchewan,  For.  Ins.  Surv.  Canad.  Dept. 
For.  Ann.  Rept.  For.  Ins.  Disease  Surv.  pp.  77-89. 

Finnegan,  R.  J. 

1959.  The  pales  weevil,  Hylobius  pales  (Hbst.),  in  southern  Ontario.  Canad. 
Ent.  91(10) : 664-670. 

1961.  A  field  key  to  the  North  American  species  of  Hylobius  (Curculionidae). 
Canad.  Ent.  93  (7) :  501-502. 

1962.  The  pine  root-collar  weevil,  Hylobius  radicis  Buchanan,  in  southern 
Ontario.  Canad.  Ent.  94(1):  11-17. 

Little,  E.  L.,  Jr. 

1953.  Check  list  of  native  and  naturalized  trees  of  the  United  States  (including 
Alaska).  Agriculture  handbook  no.  41.  U.  S.  For.  Serv.  pp.  1-472.  U.  S. 
government  printing  office,  Washington,  D.  C. 

Martin,  J.  L. 

1962.  Hylobius  congener  Dalla  Torre  on  Pinus  spp.  in  Ontario.  Canad.  Dept. 
For.  Bi-Monthly  Prog.  Rept.  18(4)  :1. 

1964.  The  insect  ecology  of  red  pine  plantations  in  central  Ontario.  Canad. 
Ent.  96(11):  1408-1417,  illus. 

Millers,  I.,  and  D.  M.  Benjamin 

1961.  A  new  Hylobius  problem  in  Jack  pine  plantations.  Proc.  North  Central 
Branch  Ent.  Soc.  Amer.  16:88-89. 

Millers,  I.,  D.  M.  Benjamin,  and  R.  E.  Warner 

1963.  A  new  Hylobius  weevil  associated  with  Jack  pine  deterioration  (Cole- 
optera: Curculionidae).  Canad.  Ent.  95(1):  18-22. 

Peirson,  H.  B. 

1921.  The  life  history  and  control  of  the  pales  weevil  ( Hylobius  pales).  Har¬ 
vard  Forest  Bull.  3:1-33. 

1937.  The  pales  weevil  ( Hylobius  pales  Hbst.).  Mass.  For.  Park  Assoc.  Tree 
Pest  Leaf.  13:1-4. 

Schaffner,  J.  V.,  and  H.  L.  McIntyre 

1944.  The  pine  root-collar  weevil.  J.  Forestry  42(4)  :269-275,  illus. 

Sippell,  W.  J.,  J.  E.  MacDonald,  and  A.  H.  Rose 

1961.  Province  of  Ontario,  For.  Ins.  Surv.  Canad.  Dept.  For.  Ann.  Rept.  For. 
Ins.  Disease  Surv.  pp.  55-72. 

Small,  J.  K. 

1933.  Manual  of  the  Southeastern  Flora.  1554  pp.  illus.  New  York.  Published 
by  the  author. 

Wallace,  D.  R. 

1954.  The  pine  root-collar  weevil  in  Ontario.  Canad.  Dept.  Agri.  For.  Biol. 
Div.  Bi-Monthly  Rept.  10(3 ):2. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


81 


Warren,  G.  L. 

1956.  Root  injury  to  conifers  in  Canada  by  species  of  Hylobius  and  Hypomolyx 
(Coleoptera:Curculionidae).  For.  Chron.  32(1): 7-10. 

1956a.  The  effect  of  some  site  factors  on  the  abundance  of  Hypomolyx  pice  us 
(Coleoptera:  Curculionidae).  Ecology  37(1) :  132-139. 

1956b.  Observations  on  the  origin  of  infestations  of  the  pine  root-collar  weevil 
in  plantations.  Canad.  Dept.  Agri.  Div.  For.,  Bi-Monthly  Prog.  Rept. 
12(3 ) : 2-3 . 

1960.  External  anatomy  of  the  adult  of  Hylobius  warreni  Wood  (Coleoptera: 
Curculionidae)  and  comparison  with  H.  pinicola  (Couper).  Canad. 
Ent.  92(5) : 32 1-341. 

Wells,  A.  B. 

1926.  Notes  on  Hylobius  pales  (Herbst)  and  Pissodes  strobi  Peck  as  nursery 
pests.  J.  Econ.  Ent.  19(2)  :412. 

Wood,  S.  L. 

1957.  The  North  American  allies  of  Hylobius  piceus  (DeGeer)  (Coleoptera: 
Curculionidae).  Canad.  Ent.  89(1). 37-43. 


BOSTRICHIDAE  (COLEOPTERA)  7:  A  NEW  XYLOTHRIPS 

FROM  CHINA 

By  Hans  Reichardt1-  2 


Study  of  the  Bostrichidae  in  the  collection  of  the  Museum  of  Comparative 
Zoology  has  revealed  an  interesting  new  Chinese  species  of  the  Old 
World  genus  Xylothrips  Lesne.  Very  few  bostrichids  have  been  reported 
from  China,  so  that  this  new  species  is  an  interesting  addition  to  the 
family.  Details  of  synonymy  and  distribution  of  two  of  the  previously 
described  species  of  Xylothrips  are  given  by  Chujo  (1958);  the  third  a 
previously  described  species,  is  the  enigmatic  X.  geofjroyi  (Montrouiser), 
known  only  from  the  type-specimen  (Lesne,  1900:626)  and  a  subsequently 
collected  female  (Chujo,  1961:5),  both  from  New  Caledonia.  Lack  of 
knowledge  of  this  species  precludes  its  inclusion  in  the  key  presented 

below. 


1  Departamento  de  Zoologia,  Secretaria  da  Agricultura  Sao  Paulo,  Brazil; 
presently  at  the  Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology,  Harvard  University,  Cambridge, 

Mass. 

2  Number  6  in  this  series  of  articles  appeared  in  Rev.  Bras.  Ent.  11:37-42. 


82 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


Xylothrips  cathaicus  Reichardt,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  1-2) 

Description  of  female.  Prothorax  and  elytra  reddish-brown,  the  latter  darkened 
at  apex;  head  dark  brown,  almost  black;  anterior  legs  with  reddish-brown  coxae, 
trochanters  and  basal  %  of  femora;  tibiae  and  apices  of  femora  of  anterior  legs 
as  well  as  the  median  and  posterior  legs  dark  brown;  abdomen  dark  brown, 
with  last  segment  somewhat  reddish.  Head  as  in  other  species  of  the  genus,  with 
dense,  yellow  pubescence  on  front;  antennae  10-segmented,  with  three  apical 
segments  (club)  typically  much  longer  than  wide.  Pronotum  wider  than  long, 
widest  behind  the  middle;  anterior  angles  ending  in  a  strong  hook;  anterior  half 
densely  and  sharply  denticulate,  the  denticules  being  much  larger  laterally;  posterior 
and  lateral  parts  of  pronotum  very  sparsely  punctate;  covered  anteriorly  and 
laterally  with  yellow  pubescence;  ridges  at  sides  of  basal  half  only  vaguely  indi¬ 
cated.  Elytra  very  indistinctly  punctate-rugose,  including  apical  declivity;  suture 
elevated  at  declivity;  sides  of  declivity  limited  by  four  very  weak  and  rounded, 
impunctate  tubercules  on  each  side,  the  lower  one  touching  lateral  margin,  but 
distinctly  separated  from  it,  as  in  religiosus.  Ventral  side  of  thorax  and  abdomen 
very  densely  punctate  and  shortly  pubescent.  Measurements:  length,  6. 3-7. 6  mm.; 
width,  2.75-3.2  mm. 

Male  unknown. 

Examined  material.  CHINA:  Hopeh,  Peiping,  G.  Liu  col.  (holotype  $ 
and  1  paratype  $  ,  Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology  n.  31194);  Honan, 
Kaifeng,  IV.  1932,  G.  Liu  col.  (2  paratypes  $  ,  Museum  of  Comparative 
Zoology  n.  31194;  1  paratype  $,  Departamento  de  Zoologia,  Sao  Paulo, 
Brazil). 

Discussion.  The  basilateral  ridges  of  the  pronotum  are  an  important 
character  for  proper  identification  of  Xylothrips  in  Lesne’s  generic  key 
(1900:474).  These  ridges  are  only  vaguely  indicated  in  cathaicus,  but 
there  is  no  doubt  about  the  generic  placement  of  the  species,  since  all 
the  other  characters  agree  with  those  of  the  type-species,  X.  flavipes 
(Illiger).  X.  cathaicus  is  easily  distinguished  from  flavipes  because  the 
apical  ridge  of  the  declivity  is  not  connected  to  the  apico-lateral  border 
of  the  elytra.  X.  religiosus  agrees  with  cathaicus  in  this  character,  but 
the  marginal  tubercles  of  religiosus  declivity  are  well  developed,  and  the 
declivity  itself  is  deeply  foveolate,  especially  on  its  upper  part.  In  cathaicus 
the  marginal  tubercles  are  very  weakly  developed,  and  the  declivity  is 
indistinctly  punctured.  In  flavipes,  the  declivity  and  its  marginal  tubercles 
are  sculptured  as  in  religiosus. 

X.  cathaicus  is  the  only  species  of  the  genus  presently  known  from 
China.  The  only  other  species  of  Xylothrips  on  the  Asian  mainland 
is  flavipes,  which  is  restricted  to  India  and  Southeast  Asia. 

The  three  better  known  species  of  Xylothrips  can  be  distinguished 
as  follows  : 

1.  Apical  declivity  of  elytra  ridged  at  lower  half  of  lateral  border  and  ridge  completely 

fused  into  apico-lateral  border - FLAVIPES  (Illiger) 

Apical  declivity  of  elytra  ridged  as  in  flavipes,  but  ridge  short  and  not  connected 

to  apico-lateral  border -  2 

2.  Tubercles  of  elytral  declivity  well  developed;  declivity  deeply  foveolate 

- RELIGIOSUS  (Boisduval) 

Tubercles  of  elytral  declivity  very  poorly  developed;  declivity  indistinctly  punctured 

- CATHAICUS,  n.  sp. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


83 


Literature  Cited 


Chujo,  m. 

1958.  Coleoptera:  Bostrychidae.  In  Insects 
figs. 

1961.  Bostrychid-Beetles  of  New  Caledonia. 
13:5-6. 


of  Micronesia,  16(2)  :85-104,  3 
Bull.  Osaka  Mus.  Nat.  Hist., 


Lesne,  P. 
1900. 


Revision  des  coleopteres  de  la  famille  des  bostrychides.  4e.  memoire. 
Ann.  Soc.  Ent.  France,  69:473-639,  illus. 


Figures  1-2.  Xylothrips  cathaicus,  new  species,  holotype.  1— lateral  view 

2 — dorsal  view. 


84 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


SIGNALS  AND  MATING  BEHAVIOR  IN  SEVERAL 
FIREFLIES  (COLEOPTERA:  LAMPYRIDAE)1  2 

By  James  E.  Lloyd1 2 3-4 

During  the  summers  of  1963-65  while  investigating  flash  communi¬ 
cation  in  Photinus  fireflies  (Lloyd,  1966),  I  also  studied  several  species 
in  six  other  genera.  Some  of  these  observations  have  already  been  re¬ 
ported  (Lloyd,  1965a,  b).  This  paper  presents  data  on  other  species. 
Recording  and  field  techniques  have  been  described  in  detail  elsewhere 
(Lloyd,  1966).  Distribution  maps  are  given  for  each  species  where 
possible,  as  it  is  essential  to  correlate  behavior  with  geographic  distri¬ 
bution. 


Lampyris  ( =Pleotomodes )  knulli  (Green) 

Few  lampyrid  beetles  described  from  North  America  are  rarer  than 
this  Florida  species  (Map  3).  Probably  no  more  than  two  dozen  are  in 
collections,  and  until  these  observations  females  had  not  been  found,  or 
at  least  had  not  been  recognized  as  knulli  females.  During  May  1964 
and  1965,  five  females  were  collected  at  the  same  site  at  Gainesville, 
Florida,  and  observations  were  made  on  their  behavior. 

Observation  dates  were  between  2  and  16  May.  Females  were  found 
glowing  along  a  mowed  roadside  adjacent  to  a  mesic  woods.  Their  glows, 
visible  at  distances  of  3  or  more  meters,  appeared  bright  green.  Captive 
females  were  placed  in  the  site  in  open  plastic  boxes  (8x8x3  cm).  They 
began  glowing  28-37  minutes  after  sunset  and  stopped  glowing  60-68 
minutes  after  sunset.  Prior  to  glowing  each  evening  they  crawled  from 
beneath  the  grass  in  their  cages  and  exposed  themselves  in  open  areas 
or  on  perches.  After  each  glowing  period  they  retreated  to  cover.  On 
May  4,  1965,  midway  through  the  normal  glow  period  one  female 
stopped  glowing;  investigation  disclosed  she  had  attracted  a  male  and 
was  mating  with  him.  On  May  8  a  free  female  was  seen  glowing,  but 
before  she  could  be  reached  she  dimmed  and  then  extinguished  her 
light.  She  was  found  mating  with  a  male. 

Males  have  a  small  luminous  area  on  the  ventral  surface  of  the 
abdomen.  None  were  seen  glowing  in  nature  even  though  over  40  nights 
were  spent  working  in  the  site  where  females  were  found.  When  chem¬ 
ically  stimulated  (ethyl  acetate,  see  Seliger  et  al.  1964)  one  male  glowed 
from  this  light  organ  (J.  Buck,  personal  comm.). 


1  This  investigation  was  supported  by  U.  S.  Public  Health  Service  Predoctoral 
Fellowship  No.  1-F1-GM-22,  196-01,  the  Sigma  Xi-RESA  research  fund,  and  the 
Bache  Fund,  Grant  No.  481. 

2  This  is  Appendix  II  of  a  thesis  presented  to  the  Graduate  School  of  Cornell 
University  in  partial  fulfillment  of  the  degree  Doctor  of  Philosophy. 

3  Present  address,  Dept,  of  Entomology,  University  of  Florida,  Gainesville,  Florida. 

4  I  thank  Dr.  Thomas  Eisner  of  Cornell  University  for  his  assistance  in  obtaining 
funds  for  this  investigation.  I  thank  Dr.  William  L.  Brown  of  Cornell  University  for 
his  helpful  comments,  criticisms,  and  suggestions  during  the  preparation  of  the 
manuscript. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


85 


Micronaspis  floridana  Green 

For  the  distribution  of  this  rare  species  see  Map  4.  Two  males  were 
collected  at  Coconut  Grove,  Florida,  May  15,  1965.  They  were  found 
within  100  meters  of  the  ocean  flying  among  low  weeds  and  frequently 
being  blown  to  the  ground  by  the  moderate  wind.  They  emitted  single 
flashes,  estimated  to  be  0.13-0.18  seconds  in  duration  (estimated  by 
comparison  with  flashes  of  known  duration  produced  by  an  electronic 
flasher  (see  Lloyd,  1966)  at  one  second  intervals  (78°F.)). 


Pyractomena  borealis  (Randall) 

For  distribution  see  Map  5.  My  observations  are  in  agreement  with 
those  of  McDermott  (1917).  This  species  was  found  in  a  mesic  woods 
in  Gainesville,  Florida,  and  in  a  stand  of  red  maple  4.3  miles  west  of 
Otter  Creek,  Florida,  from  February  28  to  March  2,  1965.  Moderately 
large  populations  were  seen,  suggesting  that  this  is  a  cold-weather  (in 
Florida  a  winter- adapted)  species. 

Flashing  activity  began  about  32  minutes  after  sunset  and  lasted  for 
approximately  50  minutes.  Males  flew  among  the  leafless  branches  2-8 
meters  above  the  ground.  Their  flash-pattern  was  a  single  flash  estimated 
to  be  0.30-0.35  seconds  in  duration  at  50°  and  0.20-0.25  seconds  at 
65°.  They  flew  slowly,  traversing  1-2  meters  between  flash-patterns  and 
4-10  centimeters  during  each  pulse.  Two  males  emitted  the  double  flash 
described  by  McDermott;  a  normal  flash  followed  by  a  less  intense  after¬ 
flash  of  approximately  the  same  duration  as  the  first.  The  pulse  interval 
(time  duration  between  beginning  of  first  pulse  and  beginning  of  second 
pulse)  of  these  two  flashes  in  one  male  measured  0.6  seconds  (stop 
watch)  at  65°.  Mean  flash-pattern  interval  at  68°  was_3.6  seconds  and 
varied  inversely  with  temperature;  x  =  4.2  (65°)  and  x  =  8.4  seconds 
(50°). 

Three  females  were  collected.  These  were  2,  4,  and  6  meters  above  the 
ground  on  tree  trunks.  Another  answered  the  flashlight  from  a  perch 
over  10  meters  above  the  ground.  They  responded  to  male,  flashlight,  and 
electronic-flasher  flashes  with  single  pulses  at  slight  time  delays.  Delays 
of  two  females  measured  with  stop  watch  at  65°  averaged  1.0  seconds. 
The  response  flashes  of  one  female  were  analyzed  by  means  of  a  portable 
transducer:  her  flashes  turned  on  an  audio  oscillator,  and  the  resulting 
tone  was  recorded  on  tape  and  later  analyzed  with  an  oscilloscope  (see 
Lloyd,  1966).  Her  mean  pulse  length  at  67°  was  0.56  seconds  (range 
0.49)!  mean  delay  time  (beginning  of  male  pulse  to  beginning  of  response 
pulse)  was  0.69  seconds  (range  0.09). 

Several  males  were  attracted  to  caged  females  and  to  the  flashlight 
when  it  was  flashed  in  a  manner  simulating  female  responses  in  length 
and  delay.  One  approach  to  a  free  female  was  observed;  after  four  flash 
exchanges  the  male  was  on  the  tree  beside  her. 

One  important  difference  was  noted  between  the  approaches  of  males 
of  this  species  and  males  of  Pyractomena  dispersa  Green.  P .  borealis  males 
approach  females  as  do  Photinus  males;  they  remain  in  flight  after  each 


86 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


Map  2.  Distribution  of  Pyractomena  dispersa  Green. 

Map.  3.  Distribution  of  Lampyris  ( —Pleotomodes )  knulli  (Green). 
Map  4.  Distribution  of  Micronaspis  floridana  Green. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


87 


exchange,  not  landing  until  very  near  the  female.  P.  dispersa  males  drop 
to  the  ground  immediately  after  the  first  exchange  and  do  not  flash  for  a 
minute  or  more  (Lloyd,  1964).  This  is  obviously  out  of  the  question  for 
borealis ,  an  “upper  story”  species. 


Pyractomena  dispersa  Green 

For  distribution  see  Map  2.  Since  the  behavior  of  this  species  was  des¬ 
cribed  (Lloyd,  1964),  additional  observations  have  been  made.  Previously, 
males  were  not  attracted  to  the  flashlight. 

Males  were  seen  flying  at  Durham,  Pennsylvania,  June  8,  1963.  over  a 
field  adjacent  to  a  small  stream.  Several  were  attracted  with  4-  or  5-pulsed 
flashes,  similar  to  those  described  for  females.  They  were  also  attracted 
to  2-pulse  flashes.  For  attraction  it  was  necessary  for  the  flashlight  to  be 
flashed  from  a  position  in  front  of  and  below  them.  Immediately  after  the 
flashlight  response  males  dropped  to  the  ground.  A  minute  or  more  passed 
before  their  next  flash-pattern. 


Pyractomena  marginalis  Green 

For  distribution  see  Map  6.  This  species  was  seen  in  Lake  Lure,  North 
Carolina,  June  24,  1963,  in  a  grassy  grove  adjacent  to  a  stream.  A  few 
males  were  observed  flying  about  40  minutes  after  sunset.  They  flew 
within  2  meters  of  the  ground,  emitting  single  short  flashes  at  5-7  seconds 

intervals  at  65°. 


Pyractomena  angulata  (Say) 

For  distribution  see  Map  1.  This  species  was  seen  in  nearly  every 
locality  visited  during  the  extensive  Photinus  investigation.  Usually  only 
one  or  two  males  were  seen  at  one  time.  These  flew  2-15  meters  above  the 
ground,  usually  at  the  tips  of  tree  branches,  with  winding,  leisurely  courses 
while  emitting  their  flickering  rusty-yellow  flashes.  The  flash-pattern  was 
a  rapidly-modulated  emission,  approximately  0.8  seconds  in  duration  at 
67°.  There  appeared  to  be  9-15  modulations  in  each  flash.  Flash-pattern 
intervals  at  67°  averaged  4.3  seconds.  Their  rapidly  modulated,  distinc¬ 
tively  colored  flashes  made  angulata  easily  recognizable. 

I  was  unable  to  attract  males  of  this  species  to  the  flashlight,  and  I 
failed  to  find  either  dense  breeding  aggregations  or  females. 


Pyractomena  linearis  LeConte  (complex) 

For  distribution  of  this  complex  see  Map  6.  The  marsh-pasture  habitat 
of  the  species  in  this  complex  is  similar  to  that  of  Photinus  ardens  LeConte 
(Lloyd,  1966),  and  one  member  of  the  complex  was  found  with  each 
ardens  deme  studied  in  the  Photinus  investigation.  The  season  of  activity 
was  also  similar  to  that  of  ardens,  about  two  or  three  weeks  in  duration 
and  ending  by  the  third  week  in  June. 


88 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


Map  5.  Distribution  of  Pyractomena  borealis  (Randall). 

Map  6.  Distribution  of  Pyractomena  linearis  LeConte  complex  (circles).  Distribu¬ 
tion  of  Pyractomena  marginalis  Green  (dots). 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


89 


Long-pulsed  linearis:  This  species  was  observed  at  Oneida  and  Milford 
Center,  New  York.  Activity  began  40-50  minutes  after  sunset  and  con¬ 
tinued  for  about  an  hour.  Males  flashed  while  flying  slightly  downward 
1-2  meters  above  the  ground;  20-50  centimeters  were  traversed  during  their 
flash- pattern,  a  steady  emission  estimated  to  be  0.5  seconds  in  duration 
at  66°.  Mean  flash-pattern  interval  at  63°  was  5.9  seconds.  Flight  paths 
of  some  males  consisted  of  a  series  of  angularly  displaced  segments.  Dur¬ 
ing  each  flash-pattern  they  flew  in  straight  lines;  between  flashes  they 
moved  laterally  1-2  meters  and  rotated  a  few  degrees.  As  a  result  during 
the  next  flash-pattern  they  scanned  a  different  area. 

Several  females  were  found  in  the  grass  within  1  meter  of  the  ground. 
They  responded  to  male  and  flashlight  flashes  with  single  flashes  1  second 
or  less  in  duration,  at  short  time  delays. 

Attractions  of  males  to  free  and  caged  females  and  to  the  flashlight 
were  similar.  After  receiving  response  flashes  from  in  front  of  or  below 
them,  males  dropped  immediately  to  the  ground,  usually  within  1  meter 
of  responding  lights. 

4-pulsed  linearis:  This  species  was  observed  at  McLean  Bog,  McLean, 
New  York.  Activity  began  about  50  minutes  after  sunset.  Male  flight  paths, 
including  angular  displacement,  were  similar  to  those  described  for^long- 
pulsed  linearis.  Male  flash-patterns  were  similar  to  those  described  lor  P. 
dispersa  (Lloyd,  1964).  Flash-pattern  interval  at  60°  averaged  5.1  seconds 

Females  were  found  on  grass  stems  within  1  meter  of  the  ground;  they 
answered  male  and  flashlight  flashes  with  4-  or  5-pulsed  emissions,  similar 
to  those  of  males,  at  short  time  delays. 

Male  approaches  were  similar  to  those  described  for  long-pulsed 
linearis  and  dispersa,  in  contrast  to  those  described  for  borealis  and 
Phctinus  species. 

Delay ed-linear is:  On  July  12,  1963,  considerably  later  than  the  season 
for  the  two  prevously  discussed  members  of  this  complex,  three  males 
emitting  flashes  similar  to  those  described  for  long-pulsed  linearis  were  seen 
at  the  4-pulsed  linearis  site  at  McLean,  New  York.  One  responsive  female 
was  found  in  the  grass.  She  emitted  single-pulsed  responses  approxi¬ 
mately  1  second  in  duration  at  an  average  delay  of  1.4  seconds  (stop¬ 
watch)  at  58°.  This  is  possibly  a  third  species  in  the  linearis  complex, 
considering  that  ( 1 )  female  delay  was  much  longer  than  that  of  long- 
pulsed  linearis,  and  (2)  long-pulsed  linearis  had  never  been  observed  in 
this  site  during  several  nights  of  early  summer  observation. 


Literature  Cited 

Lloyd,  J.  E. 

1964.  Notes  on  flash  communication  in  the  firefly  Pyractomena  dispersa 
(Coleoptera:  Lampyridae).  Ann.  Ent.  Soc.  America  57(2):  260-261. 

1965a  Observations  on  the  biology  of  three  luminescent  beetles  (Coleoptera: 
Lampyridae,  Elateridae).  Ann.  Ent.  Soc.  America  58(4):  588-591. 

1965b.  Aggressive  mimicry  in  Photuris :  Firefly  femmes  fatales.  Science  149 
(3684):  653-654. 

1966.  Studies  on  the  flash  communication  system  in  Photinus  fireflies.  Ph.D. 
Thesis,  Cornell  University,  201  pp.,  6  tables,  8  figs.,  46  maps.  (In  press, 
Univ.  of  Michigan  Mus.  Zool.  Misc.  Publ.  No.  130.) 


90 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


McDermott,  F.  A. 

1917.  Observations  on  the  light  emission  of  American  Lampyridae.  The  photo¬ 
genic  function  as  a  mating  adaptation.  Fifth  paper.  Canadian  Ent.  49: 


53-61. 


Seliger,  H.  H.,  J.  B.  Buck,  W.  G.  Fastie,  and  W.  D.  McElroy 

1964.  The  spectural  distribution  of  firefly  light.  Journ.  Gen.  Physiol.  48(1): 
95-104. 


NOTES  ON  HYPERA  MARITIMA  (TITUS).  (COLEOPTERA: 

CURCULIONIDAE ) 

At  present  this  species  is  known  to  occur  only  in  Massachusetts:  it  was  originally 
described  from  Nantucket  Island,  Martha’s  Vineyard  Island,  and  Chatham.  The 
late  C.  A.  Frost  collected  several  specimens  at  Harwich  Port,  which  like  Chatham  is 
located  on  the  Nantucket  Sound  side  of  Cape  Cod. 

Investigation  at  Harwich  Port  resulted  in  the  discovery  of  three  adults  in  early 
July;  the  following  year  larvae  were  found  in  early  June  feeding  in  the  buds  of 
Beach-Pea,  Lathyrus  maritimus  (L.)  Bigel  according  to  Gleason  (1958,  The  new 
Britton  and  Brown  illustrated  flora  .  .  .)  or  L.  japonicus  Willd.  according  to  Fernald 
(1950,  Gray’s  Manual  of  botany,  8th  ed.).  Adults  were  reared  from  the  larvae. 

The  host  plant  is  widely  distributed  in  the  cooler  parts  of  Eurasia  and  North 
America  according  to  Gleason.  In  view  of  this  Mr.  R.  T.  Thompson,  British  Museum 
(N.  H.  ),  conducted  a  brief,  preliminary  study  of  H.  maritima  and  is  of  the  opinion 
that  it  is  distinct  from  the  European  Hypera  in  the  British  Museum;  I  am  grateful  for 
his  aid. 

The  existence  of  a  species  of  Hypera  apparently  native  to  the  United  States  and 
with  such  a  singularly  limited  distribution  as  H.  maritima  is  of  great  interest.  This 
work  was  aided  by  grant  GB  1442  from  National  Science  Foundation. — D.  G. 
Kissinger,  Atlantic  Union  College,  South  Lancaster,  Mass. 


BEETLE  TALK 

The  following  proposals  concerning  the  scientific  names  of  beetles  were  placed 
before  the  International  Commission  on  Zoological  Nomenclature: 

Trypetesinae  and  Trypetesini  (Lacordaire) :  Proposed  emendation  of  family-group 
names  under  the  plenary  powers  (Insecta,  Coleoptera).  By  C.  W.  Sabrosky  and  E.  C. 
Zimmerman,  1966,  Bull.  Zool.  Nomenclature  23(1):  46-47. 

Galerita  Gouan,  1770  (Pices):  Proposed  addition  to  the  Official  Index  together 
with  addition  of  Galerita  Fabricius,  1801,  to  the  Official  List.  By  H.  Reichardt,  1966, 
Bull.  Zool.  Nomenclature  23(1):  60-61. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


91 


LARVAL  CHARACTERISTICS  OF  SOME  NORTH  DAKOTA 
CARABIDS  (COLEOPTERA:  CARABIDAE) 

By  J.  R.  Dogger  and  C.  A.  Olson1-  2 


Records  of  adult  Carabid  beetles  collected  in  North  Dakota  indicate 
that  at  least  164  species  occur  within  the  boundaries  of  the  state.  Adult 
specimens  in  the  collection  of  the  Department  of  Entomology,  North 
Dakota  State  University  at  Fargo,  were  examined  and  identified  by  Dr. 
W.  C.  Stehr  of  Ohio  University  at  Athens,  Ohio,  in  1959. 

The  larvae  of  only  a  few  of  these  ground  beetles  have  been  described. 
These  include  Calosoma  obsoletum  Say  and  C.  calidum  (Fab.)  by  Burgess 
and  Collins  (1917);  Poecilus  lucublandus  Say,  Chlaenius  sericeus  (Forst.), 
and  Galerita  janus  Fab.  by  Dimmock  and  Knab  (1904) ;  Harpalus  pennsyl- 
vanicus  (DeG.)  figured  by  Quaintance  and  Jenne  (1912);  H.  herbivagus 
Say  figured  by  Lugger  (1899);  and  H.  compar  Lee.,  Chlaenius  pennsyl- 
vanicus  Say,  and  Stenelophus  conjunctus  Say  by  Chu  (1945). 

Van  Emden  (1942)  in  England  made  a  comprehensive  study  of  the 
Carabid  larvae  and  prepared  a  descriptive  key  to  the  tribes  and  genera. 
This  work  serves  as  the  chief  source  of  background  material  for  the 
present  study,  aiding  in  the  recognition  of  larvae  and  providing  descriptive 
terms  for  significant  structures. 

Because  the  larvae  of  the  majority  of  the  Carabid  species  are  undescribed, 
the  objective  of  this  study  was  to  contribute  to  the  knowledge  of  this  group. 

METHODS  AND  PROCEDURE 
Collecting 

A  portion  of  the  material  used  in  the  study  was  obtained  by  field 
collecting.  This  was  confined  mainly  to  Cass  County.  Attempts  at  col¬ 
lecting  early  in  the  season  (June  8-22)  met  with  little  success.  During  the 
period  July  1  to  July  20,  larvae  were  more  abundant.  Best  results  were 
obtained  in  wooded  areas  near  water.  Larvae,  pupae,  and  adults  were 
found  in  such  situations  under  fallen  logs  and  other  debris.  One  of  the 
most  productive  areas  was  near  a  bridge  construction  site  where  the 
ground  was  littered  with  debris.  Larvae  were  difficult  to  find  in  cultivated 

fields  early  in  the  season. 

Use  of  a  posthole  digger  for  sampling,  particularly  in  cultivated  fields, 
did  not  prove  successful.  The  most  satisfactory  collecting  equipment 
proved  to  be  a  hand  trowel  and  a  glass  jar.  Under  logs  and  debris  larvae 
were  fairly  close  to  the  soil’s  surface,  but  some  were  found  at  a  depth 
of  four  to  six  inches  in  damp  soil  with  an  abundance  of  humus.  A  light 


1  Professor  of  Entomology  and  National  Science  Foundation  Teacher  Research 
Participant  respectively,  North  Dakota  State  University. 

2  Published  with  the  approval  of  the  Director,  N.  D.  Agr.  Expt.  Sta.  as  Paper 
No.  76  of  the  Journal  Series. 


92 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


forceps  was  first  used  to  pick  up  the  insects,  but  injury  may  have  been 
sustained  by  some  that  did  not  survive.  Picking  them  up  with  the  point 
of  a  trowel  along  with  some  soil  was  a  better  method.  Considering  the 
active  nature  of  the  carabid  larvae,  an  advantage  of  this  method  was  that 
one  hand  could  be  used  for  both  digging  and  collecting.  Care  was  taken 
to  separate  larvae  into  individual  containers  as  soon  as  possible.  Can¬ 
nibalism  frequently  occurred  within  an  hour  after  collecting. 

An  attempt  was  made  to  collect  two  or  more  larvae  of  each  apparent 
species  so  that  some  could  be  reared  and  some  preserved  as  life-like 
as  possible  for  study.  Larval  exuviae  were  retrieved  and  preserved  as  an 
additional  check  on  the  identity  of  preserved  larvae,  once  the  identity 
of  a  reared  adult  had  been  established. 

In  order  to  study  specimens  they  were  first  placed  under  refrigeration 
at  45  degrees  F.  for  two  hours  in  individual  salve  boxes.  After  this  period 
their  activity  was  sufficiently  reduced  to  make  microscopic  examination 
possible.  When  two  larvae  were  determined  to  be  identical,  one  was  boiled 
in  water  and  preserved  in  80  per  cent  ethyl  alcohol  and  the  other  one 
was  returned  to  the  culture  box  for  rearing. 

Rearing 

Each  larva  was  placed  in  a  two-ounce  tin  salve  box  containing  damp 
soil.  Though  moisture  was  essential,  if  the  soil  became  too  wet,  the 
insects  did  not  survive.  A  few  drops  of  water  added  about  every  three 
days  provided  sufficient  moisture  if  the  culture  was  initially  damp. 

Soil  from  the  natural  habitat  of  the  larva  was  used  in  most  cases 
and  proved  satisfactory.  However,  in  several  boxes,  larvae  were  placed 
in  soil  mixed  for  greenhouse  use.  The  mixture  was  not  sterilized  and  in 
nearly  every  culture  the  pupa  was  destroyed  by  mites. 

Food  for  the  larvae  was  gathered  by  sweeping  alfalfa  and  grasses 
for  lepidopterous  larvae.  Several  species,  mostly  noctuids,  were  consumed 
as  well  as  very  small  earthworms  which  existed  in  the  natural  environment 
of  the  Carabidae.  One  lepidopterous  larva  every  two  or  three  days  pro¬ 
vided  sufficient  food  to  maintain  the  carabid  larva  to  pupation  period. 
In  many  cases  mature  larvae  pupated  within  a  few  days  after  collection. 

For  recording  purposes,  the  living  larvae,  identical  preserved  specimens, 
cast  skins  and  reared  adults  were  all  assigned  the  same  number. 


Material  and  Descriptions 

Descriptions  of  identified  larvae  were  based  on  insects  taken  as  larvae 
and  reared  to  the  adult  stage.  The  species  reared  and  the  numbers  in¬ 
volved  are  reported  with  their  descriptions. 


Micromaseus  femoralis  (Kirby) 

The  description  is  based  on  one  reared  specimen  and  one  preserved 
specimen,  both  taken  in  Cass  County  in  July.  The  reared  insect  remained 
in  the  pupal  stage  only  4  days. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


93 


Head.  Slightly  broader  than  long  and  slightly  narrower  than  prothorax  and  not 
strongly  constricted  posteriorly.  Antennae  extending  forward  beyond  mandibles, 
first  2  segments  cylindrical,  second  about  three-fourths  length  of  first,  third  with 
exterior  margin  angular  and  subequal  in  length  to  first,  fourth  about  one-halt 
the  length  of  third.  Sensorial  appendage  of  third  antennal  segment  conical  with 
diameter  of  base  subequal  to  height.  Mandible  with  small  triangular  retinaculum 
located  about  two-fifths  distance  from  base  to  apex.  First  segment  of  labial  palps 
with  single  seta  on  inner  margin.  Maxillary  palps  with  each  segment  smaller  in 
diameter  than  the  preceding  from  base  to  apex,  first  and  fourth  subequal  in  length, 
second  and  third  subequal  in  length,  first  about  as  broad  as  long,  fourth  much 
longer  than  broad.  Outer  lobe  of  maxilla  with  first  segment  about  one  and  one-fourth 
times  as  long  as  second.  Inner  lobe  an  apparently  unsegmented  projection  with 
strong  terminal  seta.  Nasale  concave,  without  regular  denticulation  and  with 
projecting  outer  limits.  Fronto-clypeal  area  with  single  pair  of  prominent  setae. 
Six  ocelli  on  each  side  arranged  in  transverse  arcs  with  a  pigmented  area  just 
caudad  of  anterior  3,  prominent  seta  just  anterior  to  uppermost  of  posterior  3  and 
another  anterior  to  second  of  this  group.  Ocellar  grooves  and  ceivical  grooves 
prominent,  former  curving  parallel  with  frontal  sutures,  latter  paralleling  cervical 
margin  of  head.  Stem  of  epicranial  suture  short,  about  one-seventh  as  long  as 
fronto-clypeal  area.  Cervical  triangle  large  and  lightly  sclerotized. 


Figures  1-6,  Dorsal  aspects  of  head  (upper  row)  and  abdominal  segments  8 
through  10  (lower  row)  of  some  carabid  larvae.  1-2,  Micromaseus  femoral  is 
(Kby.).  3-4,  Amara  cupreolata  (Ptzys.).  5-6,  Anadaptus  discoideus  (Dej.). 


94 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


Thorax.  Tergites  margined  anteriorly,  pronotum  completely  margined.  Prothorax 
approximately  one  and  one-half  times  as  long  as  mesothorax  which  is  subequal  to 
metathorax;  tergum  with  4  prominent  setae  along  each  lateral  margin  and  an 
additional  seta  dorsad  of  the  most  anterior  on  each  side;  mesal  longitudinal  groove 
prominent,  lateral  furrows  straight,  running  perpendicularly  to  meson  one-third  of 
distance  from  anterior  margin  of  tergum  to  posterior.  Pleural  sclerites  long  and 
contiguous  with  pronotum,  divided  into  2  triangular  plates  on  meso-  and  metathorax. 
Prosternum  forming  a  subtriangular  plate.  Legs  of  medium  length  with  two  equal 
claws.  Femora  with  double  row  of  5  to  7  irregular  spines  on  ventral  surface. 

Abdomen.  Segments  gradually  tapering  caudally.  Tergites  covering  most  or  all 
of  dorsal  surface,  margined  anteriorly  and  laterally  for  anterior  half.  Tergites  with 
single  prominent  seta  at  each  posterolateral  corner.  Epipleurites  1,  2,  3,  and  8  each 
with  1  large  and  2  small  setae,  fourth  through  seventh  with  1  large  and  1  small. 
First  and  second  hypopleurites  with  2  large  and  1  small  setae,  third  through  eighth 
with  a  single  large  seta.  Ninth  segment  two-thirds  as  long  as  eighth.  Cerci  twice 
as  long  as  ninth  segment,  non-articulating,  at  first  diverging  then  converging  with 
tips  almost  parallel.  Nine  setae  present  on  each  cercus  with  all  but  first  and 
last  two  on  a  distinct  nodule.  Tenth  segment  approximately  as  long  as  ninth  and 
visible  dorsally,  extending  caudally  for  about  half  length  of  cerci.  Length  of 
extended  full  grown  larvae,  12  mm. 


Amara  cupreolata  (Putzeys) 

Two  specimens  collected  in  July,  pupated  ten  days  later  and  emerged 
as  adults  six  days  after  pupation.  The  following  description  is  based 
on  these  specimens  and  a  preserved  complete  larva.  All  were  taken  in 
Cass  County. 

Head.  Slightly  longer  than  broad,  of  approximately  same  width  as  prothorax, 
not  constricted  posteriorly.  Antennae  extending  forward  slightly  beyond  mandibles, 
first  2  segments  subcylindrical,  second  about  one-half  times  length  of  first,  their 
apical  diameters  subequal.  Third  antennal  segment  has  exterior  margin  angular 
and  is  subequal  in  length  to  first.  Sensorial  appendage  of  third  segment  is  conical 
with  height  one-half  times  diameter  of  base.  Fourth  segment  is  cylindrical  and  sub¬ 
equal  in  length  to  second.  Third  segment  bears  3  setae,  2  on  outer  margin  caudad 
to  sensorial  appendage,  third  on  inner  margin  near  the  apical  end  of  segment. 
Fourth  bears  3  setae  apically  and  another  at  about  middle  of  inner  side.  Mandible 
without  teeth  but  with  small  triangular  retinaculum  located  on  basal  third.  Labial 
palps  with  first  segment  longer  than  second,  first  subcylindrical,  second  cylindrical 
tapering  to  a  rounded  apex,  basal  diameter  of  second  about  one-half  that  of  first. 
Ligula  absent  or  reduced  with  2  strong  setae.  Stipes  of  maxillae  with  2  prominent 
setae,  1  on  outer  margin  slightly  below  middle,  second  located  dorsally  on  apical 
fourth.  Inner  lobe  of  maxilla  reduced  to  an  apparently  unsegmented  projection 
bearing  strong  terminal  seta.  Outer  lobe  with  first  segment  cylindrical,  second 
subconical  with  a  rounded  apex,  about  three-fourths  length  of  first  and  with 
basal  diameter  one-half  that  of  first.  Maxillary  palps  with  second  segment  two 
and  one-half  times  length  of  first  and  subequal  to  combined  lengths  of  third  and 
fourth.  Basal  diameter  of  third  segment  is  one-half  that  of  second  and  twice  that 
of  fourth.  Nasale  slightly  concave  and  with  dense  row  of  setae  along  concave 
margin.  Adnasales  not  prominent  but  each  bearing  strong  seta.  Frontal  clypeal 
area  with  3  pairs  of  darkened  ridges,  2  curving  obliquely  backward  from  antero¬ 
lateral  margins,  third  parallel  with  mesal  line  and  adjacent  to  sutures  of  posterior 
portion  of  fronto-clypeal  area.  With  single  pair  of  setae  near  inner  end  of  median 
ridge  on  either  side.  Frontal  piece  not  touching  hind  margin  of  head,  epicranial 
suture  short.  Six  ocelli  on  each  side  arranged  in  2  transverse  arcs  just  posterior  to 
base  of  antenna  with  a  darker  pigmented  area  between  ocelli.  One  strong  seta  located 
within  ocellar  area  on  either  side.  Ocellar  and  cervical  groove  present,  former  parallel 
to  frontal  sutures,  latter  running  parallel  to  hind  margin  of  head.  Two  strong  setae  lo¬ 
cated  one  on  either  side  of  frontoclypeal  area  mesad  to  caudal  end  of  ocellar  groove. 
Another  seta  located  on  either  side  of  outer  margin  of  head  just  anterior  to  seta 
just  described. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


95 


Thorax.  Meso-  and  metatergites  margined  anteriorly,  mesal  longitudinal  line 
prominent.  Prothorax  only  slightly  longer  than  other  segments.  Pronotum  with 
3  setae  on  each  side,  1  in  antero-lateral  corner,  a  second  midway  along  lateral 
margin,  and  third  located  obliquely  dorsad;  others  near  posterior  rnargin.  Two 
additional  small  setae  located  in  a  line  dorsad  of  anterior  seta  and  1  small  seta 
located  ventrad  of  posterior  seta.  Meso-  and  metanota  differ  in  that  so-called  posterior 
seta  is  located  almost  directly  dorsad  of  median  seta  and  additional  small  posterior  seta 
is  lacking.  Pleural  sclerites  are  contiguous  with  pronotum  faintly  sclerotized  but 
separate  from  meso-  and  metanota,  bearing  1  seta  each.  Legs  of  medium  length  with 
2  equal  claws.  Femur  and  tibia  each  with  a  transverse  row  of  3  or  4  spines  on 
ventral  side. 

Abdomen.  Segments  gradually  tapering  caudally.  Tergites  covering  most  of  the 
dorsal  surface,  margined  anteriorly;  mesal  longitudinal  groove  prominent,  with 
single  prominent  seta  on  each  postero-lateral  corner  of  each  segment,  another 
smaller  seta  at  posterior  ends  of  marginal  groove  and  another  small  seta  near  large 
posterior  seta.  Epipleurites  with  1  large  and  2  small  setae  Hypopleuntes  with 
1  prominent  seta  and  an  additional  small  seta  on  some.  Ninth  and  tenth  segments 
subequal  in  length.  Cerci  approximately  two  and  one-half  times  length  of  ninth 
segment,  non-articulating,  diverging  for  basal  third,  then  almost  parallel  to  tips. 
Five  setae  present  on  each  cercus. 

Anadaptus  discoideus  (Dejean) 

Six  larvae,  collected  in  Cass  County,  were  reared  to  maturity  on  July 
18-20.  These  remained  in  the  pupal  stage  for  six  days.  In  addition  to  the 
six  exuviae,  sixteen  other  larvae  were  examined  and  considered  identical. 
All  were  from  Cass  County  and  were  taken  during  the  period  June  20 

to  August  5. 

Overall  appearance.  Larva  appearing  brown,  head,  meso-  and  metanota  and 
abdominal  tergites  testaceous,  pronotum  deep  brown,  almost  black.  Remaining 
sclerites  and  legs  are  paler,  the  non-sclerotized  area  near  white.  Extended  length 
of  the  full  grown  larva  is  18.6  mm. 

Head  Slightly  broader  than  long,  slightly  narrower  than  prothorax  and  distinctly 
constricted  posteriorly.  Width  2.2  mm.  Antennae  extending  forward  as  far  as 
mandibles,  first  segment  cylindrical,  second  subcylindncal,  and  three-fourths  as  long 
as  first,  third  as  long  as  second  with  outer  margin  excavated  for  apical  third,  fourth 
about  one-half  length  of  third  and  more  slender.  Sensorial  appendage  on  third 
segment  is  conical  with  diameter  of  base  subequal  to  height.  Three  setae  arise 
from  third  and  4  from  fourth  segment,  3  of  them  prominent,  fourth  less  evident 
Mandible  strong  and  somewhat  flattened  with  prominent  pointed  retinaculum  located 
nearly  midway  between  base  and  apex  and  1  seta  extending  from  midpoint  of 
lateral  margin.  First  segment  of  labial  palps  cylindrical,  second  less  than  one-halt 
length  of  first  and  very  slender,  tapering  toward  apex,  mentum  with  several 
scattered  setae,  2  prominent  setae  extending  ventrally,  ligula  broadly  triangular 
with  2  closely  parallel  setae.  Stipes  of  maxillae  rather  slender  with  a  fringe  of  long 
hair  along  median  margin  and  3  or  4  setae  on  lateral  margin.  Maxillary  palps  with 
each  segment  smaller  in  diameter  than  preceding  from  base  to  apex.  First  segment 
of  palps  short,  nearly  as  broad  as  long.  Second  segment  one  and  one-half  times 
as  long  as  third  and  tapering  toward  apex.  Outer  lobe  of  maxilla  with  first  segment 
about  one  and  one-fourth  times  length  of  second  and  with  a  prominent  seta  on 
apical  third;  second  slender  and  tapering  toward  apex.  Inner  lobe  an  apparently 
unsegmented  projection  with  strong  terminal  seta.  Nasale  projecting  forward  with 
blunt  central  tooth  and  4  prominent,  pointed  teeth  on  either  side.  Adnasales 
prominent,  projecting  nearly  as  far  anteriorly  as  central  tooth  of  nasale.  Fronto- 
clypeal  area  with  prominent  seta  on  either  side  posterior  to  inner  end  of  clypeal 
groove,  a  somewhat  less  prominent  seta  behind  junction  of  frontal  and  clypeal 
grooves  on  each  side  and  a  similar  pair  along  each  margin  caudo-laterally  from 
adnasale,  and  3  pairs  of  shorter  setae  extending  backwards  from  nasale  in  two 
diverging  arcs.  Additional  finer  setae  also  present.  Six  ocelli  arranged  in  2  transverse 
areas  on  each  side  with  a  pigmented  area  and  a  prominent  seta  between  them. 


96 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


Ocellar  furrow  lacking,  cervical  groove  prominent,  extending  obliquely  forward 
for  about  two-fifths  of  the  distance  between  epicranial  suture  and  ocelli,  then 
bending  backward  in  a  straight  line  perpendicular  to  longitudinal  axis  of  head, 
though  not  parallel  with  sinuate  hind  margin  of  head.  Epicranial  suture  short, 
about  one-sixth  as  long  as  fronto-clypeal  area.  Cervical  triangle  large,  lightly 
sclerotized  and  with  broadly  rounded  apex.  Strong  seta  located  on  either  side  of 
head  just  antero-laterad  of  bend  in  cervical  groove;  2  short  setae  present  on  either 
side,  1  just  behind  antenna,  a  second  in  line  with  this  and  midway  between  it 
and  strong  seta.  A  second  prominent  seta  found  on  side  of  head  laterad  of  strong 
seta  and  2  small  setae  found  on  either  side  just  anterior  to  cervical  groove,  one 
near  frontal  suture,  other  midway  between  bend  and  side  of  head. 

Thorax.  Pronotum  margined  on  all  sides;  meso-  and  metanota  margined  an¬ 
teriorly.  Prothorax  almost  twice  as  long  as  either  of  other  segments.  Pronotum 
with  2  rows  of  3  setae  on  each  side,  one  row  posterior  to  anterior  margin,  other 
anterior  to  posterior  marginal  line.  Meso-  and  metatergites  with  large  seta  midway 
along  lateral  margin  and  2  unequal  lesser  setae  at  antero-lateral  corner  on  each 
side,  4  regularly  spaced  setae  varying  in  size  in  a  transverse  line  plus  an  occasional 
additional  anterior  seta  on  each  side  and  three  setae  in  a  transverse  line  posteriorly 
on  each  side,  2  outer  setae  large,  mesal  small.  Sternites  lightly  sclerotized  with  2 
rows  of  short  setae  coverging  posteriorly.  Mesothoracic  spiracle  elliptical  and 
prominent.  Legs  of  a  uniform  light  color.  Coxae  with  double  row  of  setae  on 
outer  surface  plus  2  additional  setae  forming  a  ring  of  4  at  distal  end.  Tarsus  with 
2  unequal  claws  subtended  by  2  short,  stout  setae. 

Abdomen.  First  5  segments  rather  broad;  segments  6  through  9  tapering  caudally. 
Tergites  covering  one-half  to  two-thirds  of  dorsal  surface,  margined  anteriorly,  with 
2  transverse  rows  of  setae.  These  consist  of  3  well-spaced  prominent  setae  on  either 
side  of  mesal  line  anteriorly  and  2  well-spaced  prominent  setae  posteriorly  plus 
a  small  seta  in  line  on  either  side  of  upper  seta  posteriorly,  a  small  seta  between 
2  rows  on  lateral  margin  on  first  5  tergites  and  several  small  setae  appearing 
irregularly  in  association  with  large  anterior  setae.  First  epipleurite  with  3  or  4 
setae,  second  through  eighth  with  4  or  5  setae,  ninth  pleurite  with  3  setae.  First 
hypopleurite  apparently  subdivided  with  seta  on  each  part;  remaining  hypopleurites 
with  3  or  4  setae.  Ninth  segment  two-thirds  as  long  as  eighth.  Cerci  more  than 
twice  as  long  as  ninth  segment,  at  first  diverging  and  then  continuing  almost  parallel 
to  apex,  non-anticulating  at  base  with  8  setae  on  each  cercus  and  all  but  first 
and  last  2  on  a  distinct  nodule.  Tenth  segment  slightly  longer  than  ninth,  cylindrical 
and  directed  ventrally  at  about  a  30  degree  angle. 


Literature  Cited 

Burgess,  A.  F.  and  C.W.  Collins 

1917.  The  genus  Calosoma.  U.  S.  Dept.  Agric.  Bull.  417,  pp.  98-103. 

Chu,  H.  F. 

1945.  Larvae  of  the  Harpalinae  Unisetose  (Coleoptera:  Carabidae).  Jour. 
Brooklyn  Ent.  Soc.  (n.s.).  1:1-71. 

Dimmock,  G.  and  F.  Knab 

1904.  Early  stages  of  Carabidae.  Springfield  Mus.  Nat.  Hist.,  Bull.  1:3-55. 
Lugger,  O. 

1899.  Beetles:  Injurious  to  our  fruit  producing  plants.  Minn.  Agr.  Expt.  Sta. 
Bull.  66:107. 

Quaintance,  A.  L.,  and  E.  L.  Jenne 

1912.  The  Plum  Curculio.  U.  S.  Dept.  Agric.  Div.  Ent.  Bull,  (n.s.)  103:153. 
Van  Emden,  F.  I. 

1942.  A  Key  to  the  Genera  of  Larval  Carabidae  (Col.)  Trans.  Ent.  Soc.  of 
London.  92(1):  1-99.  100  figs. 


[ 


—  BACK  ISSUES— 


The  Coleopterists'  Bulletin 


Vol.  3, 
Vol.  4, 
Vol.  5, 
Vol.  6, 
Vol.  7, 
Vol.  8, 
Vol.  9, 
Vol.  10, 
Vol.  11, 
Vol.  12, 
Vol.  13, 
Vol.  14, 
Vol.  15, 
Vol.  16, 
Vol.  17, 
Vol.  18, 
Vol.  19, 


1949,  6  issues  (Nos.  i  &  2 

1950,  6  issues 

1951,  6  issues 

1952,  4  issues 

1953,  6  issues 

1954,  6  issues 

1955,  6  issues 

1956,  6  issues 

1957,  2  issues 

1958,  1  issue 

1959,  4  issues 

1960,  4  issues 

1961,  4  issues 

1962,  4  issues 

1963,  4  issues 

1964,  4  issues 

1965,  4  issues 


Per 

Single 

Volume 

Issue 

$5.00 

$1.00 

5.00 

1.00 

5.00 

1.00 

5.00 

1.25 

5.00 

1.00 

5.00 

1.00 

5.00 

1.00 

5.00 

1.00 

5.00 

3.00 

5.00 

5.00 

5.00 

1.25 

5.00 

1.25 

5.00 

1.25 

5.00 

1.25 

5.00 

1.25 

5.00 

1.25 

5.00 

1.25 

THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 

620  Michigan  Avenue,  N.E.  Washington,  D.  C.  20017 


Now  in  its  38th  year — 

Anthropological  Quarterly 

(formerly  Primitive  Man) 

Issued  January,  April,  July  and  October 

<r*o 


Some  Recent  Contents: 

Grasshoppers  as  Food  in  Buhaya. . P-  O.  Mor» 

A  Pygmy  Group  Newly  Discovered  in  New  Guinea.  Martin  Gusinde 

Eskimo  Reindeer  Herding . Robert  T.  Anderson 

Rock  Paintings  of  South  Africa . Abbe  Henri  Breuil 

The  Assinboin  Horse  Medicine  Cult . John  C.  Ewers 

Treatment  of  Disease  in  the  New  Guinea  Highlands 

Louis  J.  Luzbetak 


(Articles  on  Physical  and  Cultural  Anthropology ) 

Subscription  Price  $5.00  a  year  Single  Issues  $1.00 

Anthropological  Quarterly 

620  Michigan  Ave.,  N.E.  Washington,  D.  C.  20017 


Separate  Sections  available  from 


THE  BEETLES  OF  THE  UNITED  STATES* 

by 

Dr.  Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr. 

An  Introduction  to  the  Study  of  Beetles  $1.00 

Section  1 — Cupedidae,  Rhysodidae,  Cicindelidae,  Carabidae  by 
George  E.  Ball,  Amphizoidae,  Haliplidae,  Dytiscidae, 
Noteridae,  Gyrinidae  $3.00 

Section  2 — Sphaeriidae,  Hydroscaphidae,  Hydrophilidae,  Limne- 
biidae,  Georyssidae,  Staphylinidae,  Pselaphidae,  Sil- 
phidae,  Leptodiridae,  Leptinidae,  Leiodidae,  Ptiliidae, 
Limulodidae,  Scydmaenidae,  Scaphidiidae,  Brathinidae  $3.00 

Section  3 — Histeridae,  Sphaeritidae,  Lucanidae,  Passalidae,  Scara- 
baeidae,  Clambidae,  Dascillidae,  Helodidae,  Eucine- 
tidae,  Byrrhidae,  Psephenidae,  Ptilodactylidae,  Chelo- 
nariidae,  Heteroceridae,  Limnichidae,  Dryopidae, 
Elmidae,  Buprestidae,  Rhipiceridae,  Cebrionidae, 
Elateridae,  Throscidae,  Cerophytidae,  Perothopidae, 
Eucnemidae  $3.00 

Section  4 — Not  Available 

Section  5 — Tenebrionidae,  Lagriidae,  Alleculidae,  Monommidae, 
Othniidae,  Salpingidae,  Pyrochroidae,  Melandryidae, 
Cephaloidae,  Oedemeridae,  Pedilidae,  Anthicidae, 
Euglenidae,  Nitidulidae,  Rhizophagidae,  Sphindidae, 
Cucujidae,  Cryptophagidae,  Biphyllidae,  Byturidae, 
Languriidae,  Endomychidae,  Coccinellidae,  Erotylidae, 
Phalacridae,  Cisidae,  Orthoperidae,  Lathridiidae,  Coly- 
diidae,  Mycetophagidae  $3.00 

Section  6 — Cerambycidae,  Chrysomelidae,  Bruchidae,  Anthribi- 

dae,  Brentidae,  Curculionidae,  Platypodidae,  Scolytidae  $3.00 

INDEX  $2.00 

*  Complete  book  is  out  of  print. 

Send  your  order  today!! 

The  Catholic  University  of  America  Press 
620  Michigan  Avenue,  N.E. 

Washington,  D.  C.  20017 


MA 


THE 


COLEOPTERISi 


BULLETIN 


VOLUME  20 


1  &  L  f 

dhU  <D  too/ 


DECEMBER 


(No.  4) 


CHRY SOMELID AE :  On  Lexiphanes,  by  Balsbaugh  . 

CURCULIONID AE :  Polymorphism  in  Anthonomus,  by  Burke  . 
CURCULIONIDAE:  Cyrtobagous  in  the  U.  S.,  by  Kissinger  .  . 

HYDRADEPHAGA:  Origin,  by  Bell  . 

HYDROPHILIDAE :  Larva  of  Derallus  rudis,  by  Spangler  .  .  . 
HYDROPHILIDAE:  A  question,  by  Leech . 

LIMNICHIDAE:  New  Martinius,  by  Spilman  . 

SCARAB AEIDAE:  Heteronychus  larvae,  by  Jerath  . 


\Vi  Ubiliifti  01  w 


Literature  Notice  4  1967 .  103,  106,  122 

Notice  . •  Ill|l,0rn .  128 

L  •*»  •* 

THE  CATHOLIC  UNIVERSITY  OF  AMERICA  PRESS 

WASHINGTON,  D.C.  20017  BIOLOGY  LIBRA! 

mt  fS i  : •  -- 


A  Quarterly  Publication  Devoted 
to  the  Study  of  Beetles 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS*  BULLETIN 

Founded  1947  by  Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr. 

The  Coleopterists’  Bulletin  is  published  by  The  Catholic  University  of  America 
Press,  Washington,  D.  C.  20017  and  edited  by  T.  J.  Spilman.  It  is  issued  four  times  a 
year  beginning  with  March.  All  business  matters  should  be  addressed  to  The  Cole¬ 
opterists’  Bulletin  at  the  Press.  Manuscripts  and  other  editorial  matter  should  be 
addressed  to  the  editor,  U.  S.  National  Museum,  Washington,  D.  C.  20560. 


Subscriptions:  The  subscription  price  for 
each  annual  volume  of  four  numbers  is 
$5.00  payable  in  advance.  All  sub¬ 
scriptions  begin  with  the  first  issue  of 
the  year  and  those  subscribing  later  in 
the  year  will  receive  the  back  issues  of 
the  volume. 


Back  volumes:  A  stock  of  back  volumes 
is  maintained  and  may  be  purchased  as 
follows:  3  to  date,  $5.00  ea.;  single  num¬ 
bers,  $1.25  each;  all  prices  postpaid. 
Missing  numbers:  Issues  lost  in  the  mail 
will  be  supplied  free  of  charge  if  notified 
within  three  months  after  mailing. 


EDITORIAL  BOARD 


Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr.,  Ph.D. 

Department  of  Biology 
Catholic  University  of  America 

O.  L.  Cartwright 

U.  S.  National  Museum 
Washington,  D.  C.  20560 

Eugene  J.  Gerberg,  Ph.D. 

Insect  Control  and  Research,  Inc. 
Baltimore,  Md. 


James  A.  Magner,  Ph.D.,  S.T.D. 

Business  Manager  of  the  Bulletin 
Catholic  University  of  America 

Theodore  J.  Spilman 

U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture 
Washington,  D.  C.  20560 

Eileen  R.  Van  Tassell 

Department  of  Biology 
Catholic  University  of  America 


NOTICE  TO  AUTHORS 


Manuscripts  will  be  considered  ONLY 
FROM  SUBSCRIBERS.  Authors  should 
consult  STYLE  MANUAL  FOR  BIO¬ 
LOGICAL  JOURNALS,  prepared  by  the 
Committee  on  Form  and  Style  of  the  Con¬ 
ference  of  Biological  Editors,  and  pub¬ 
lished  by  the  American  Institute  of  Bio¬ 
logical  Sciences,  2000  P  St.,  N.W.,  Wash¬ 
ington,  D.  C.  20008.  The  Bulletin  requires 
that  all  manuscripts  be  prepared  according 
to  instructions  in  the  Style  Manual.  Illus¬ 
trations  should  be  sent  mounted,  and 
numbered.  The  manuscript  should  be 
marked  to  indicate  the  location  of  text 
figures  or  the  position  of  full  page  plates. 

Manuscripts  will  be  acknowledged  upon 
receipt.  As  soon  as  possible  thereafter  the 
author  will  be  notified  as  to  acceptance 
after  review  by  the  Editorial  Board.  If 
the  manuscript  is  accepted,  a  tentative 
date  of  publication  will  be  set.  In  general, 


all  papers  will  be  published  in  their  order 
of  receipt,  but  the  editor  reserves  the  right 
to  use  articles  out  of  order  in  the  interest 
of  a  balanced  magazine. 

The  editor  will  make  no  text  changes 
without  advanced  notice  to  the  author. 
Galley  proof  will  be  sent  for  correction. 
These  galleys  are  sent  out  well  in  advance 
and  do  NOT  indicate  the  date  or  order  of 
publication. 

Twenty-five  tear  sheets  of  one  page 
notes  will  be  supplied  free  to  the  author  if 
requested  when  returning  galley  proofs. 
Reprints  of  articles  printed  free  of  extrane¬ 
ous  matter  will  be  supplied  with  or  with¬ 
out  covers  at  cost.  Reprints  MUST  be 
ordered  on  the  form  provided  when  re¬ 
turning  galley  proofs.  The  approximate 
cost  of  reprints  will  be  supplied  with  this 
form. 


EDITORIAL  POLICY 

Any  article,  note,  or  news  items  likely  cases,  descriptions  of  new  species  must  be 
to  be  of  interest  to  readers  of  the  Bulletin  illustrated.  Descriptions  of  new  species  or 
will  be  considered.  Articles  with  illustra-  genera  MUST  contain  keys  or  be  corre- 
tions  are  particularly  desired,  and  in  all  lated  with  existing  keys. 


A  QUARTERLY  PUBLICATION  DEVOTED  TO  THE  STUDY  OF  BEETLES 


The  Coleopterists’  Bulletin 

Volume  20  December  (No.  4)  1966 


A  DESCRIPTION  OF  THE  LARVA  OF  DERALLUS 
RUDIS  SHARP  (COLEOPTERA:  H YDROPHILIDAE ) 1 

By  Paul  J.  Spangler2 

For  many  years  the  placement  of  Derallus,  Regimbartia  and  Globaria 
in  the  tribe  Berosini  was  questioned  by  systematists  but  probably  not 
changed  becaused  the  larvae  were  not  definitely  known.  However,  Bertrand 
(1962)  described  a  hydrophilid  larva  (his  Type  D)  from  Africa  which 
he  assigned  to  the  Derallus  group  and  which  he  included  in  the  subfamily 
Hydrobiinae.  Bertrand  stated  that  he  placed  his  African  larva  in  the  Deral¬ 
lus  group  of  hydrophilid  larvae  at  the  suggestion  of  J.  Balfour-Browne  of 
the  British  Museum  who,  when  he  examined  the  African  larva,  associated 
it  with  American  larvae  that  he  believed  to  be  Derallus. 

For  several  years  I  looked  for  larvae  associated  with  Derallus  adults  that 
might  represent  the  genus.  On  August  10,  1964,  at  Alvarado,  Veracruz, 
Mexico,  I  found  larvae  new  to  me  and  which  were  associated  with  adults 
of  Derallus.  I  suspected  that  these  were  Derallus  larvae  and  six  were  kept 
alive  for  rearing  and  twelve  others  were  preserved  for  study.  Five  of  the 
six  larvae  kept  for  rearing  died  from  excessive  heat  while  enroute  to  Wash¬ 
ington,  D.  C.  The  larva  that  survived  pupated  in  my  office  sometime 
during  my  absence  on  September  16  and  17,  1964.  When  I  discovered 
the  pupa  on  Friday,  September  18,  the  eyes  were  dark  red  indicating  that 
eclosion  probably  would  occur  during  the  weekend.  Therefore,  I  made 
a  few  hasty  notes  on  the  number  of  styli  on  the  head  and  pronotum  and 
rushed  the  pupa  to  the  photo  lab  to  obtain  a  photographic  record  of  the 
pupal  stage.  Unfortunately,  eclosion  occurred  while  the  specimen  was  lying 
on  the  stage  as  the  camera  was  being  adjusted.  As  a  result,  only  a  photo 
of  the  teneral  adult  and  cast  off  pupal  skin  (fig.  1)  was  obtained.  The 
larva  definitely  proved  to  be  the  immature  stage  of  Derallus. 

The  similarity  of  the  Derallus  larva  to  that  of  Bertrand’s  African  larva 
(either  Regimbartia  or  Globaria )  is  striking  and  supports  the  separation 
of  these  three  genera  from  the  Berosini.  It  also  indicates  that  Balfour- 
Browne  correctly  assigned  the  American  larva  to  Derallus. 

Because  this  is  apparently  the  first  Derallus  larva  reared  to  confirm  its 
identity,  the  larva  is  described  below. 

1  This  study  was  made  possible  in  part  by  Grant  GB-1697  from  the  National 

Science  Foundation.  .  ,  „  .  .  _  _  c  ... 

2  Department  of  Entomology,  United  States  National  Museum,  Smithsonian 

Institution,  Washington,  D.  C. 


98 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


Figure  1 — Derallus  rudis  Sharp,  teneral  adult  and  pupal  skin 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


99 


Description  of  Last-Instar  Larva  of  Derallus  rudis  Sharp 

(Figs.  2-11) 

Total  length,  5.8  mm.;  width  of  prothoracic  segment  1.0  mm.  Color  creamy 
yellow  with  sclerotized  portions  light  yellowish  brown.  Integument  covered  with 
minute,  irregularly  arranged  asperities. 

Head  quadrangular  (fig.  8);  0.65  mm.  wide;  0.45  mm.  from  labroclypeus  to 
occipital  foramen.  Frontoclypeal  suture  absent.  Ecdysial  cleavage  lines  present, 
arising  near  outer  angle  of  cervical  sclerites  and  curving  gently  to  bases  of  antennae. 
Frons  broadly  U-shaped.  Cervical  sclerites  present,  subrectangular  in  shape.  Dorsal 
surface  of  head  glabrous  except  2  short  setae  each  side  of  midline  on  a  line  between 
bases  of  antennae.  Ventral  surface  of  head  glabrous  except  for  2  long  setae  below 
each  ocular  area  and  1  long  seta  each  side  of  midline  at  midlength;  gula  triangular;  2 
tentorial  pits  in  gular  suture  (fig.  9). 

Labroclypeus  (fig.  6)  symmetrical;  with  3  minute  (magnified  90x)  teeth  medially 
and  3  minute  teeth  on  inner  side  of  feeble  anterolateral  projections  of  epistoma; 
each  tooth  separated  by  a  small  seta. 

Ocular  areas  with  6  ocelli  arranged  in  2  oblique  rows;  anterior  row  of  4  ocelli, 
3  large  and  1  (innermost)  small;  posterior  row  of  2  large  ocelli. 

Antenna  moderately  long,  subcylindrical,  slightly  longer  than  length  of  stipes.  First 
segment  sinuate,  longer  than  remaining  2  segments  combined  and  with  a  small, 
seta-bearing  appendage  on  inner  apical  angle.  Penultimate  segment  curved  inward, 
bearing  a  stout  seta  as  long  as  ultimate  segment  on  outer  apical  angle  and  2  fine 
setae  on  inner  apical  angle.  Ultimate  segment  almost  a  fourth  as  long  as  penultimate 
segment  and  bearing  3  setae  on  apex. 

Mandibles  symmetrical,  prominent,  slender,  sharply  pointed  apically.  Each 
mandible  with  1  large  and  1  medium  tooth.  Molar  area  smooth  and  gently  rounded. 

Maxilla  with  stipes  slender,  elongate  and  nearly  parallel-sided,  tapering  distally 
and  bearing  row  of  4  slender  setae  on  inner  and  4  slender  setae  on  outer 
margin.  Palpifer  about  as  long  as  penultimate  segment,  with  slender  appendage 
about  half  as  long  as  first  segment  of  palpus  on  inner  apical  angle  and  a  long,  slender, 
terminal  seta.  Palpus  tapering  distally;  first  segment  short  and  only  a  third  as  long 
as  second  segment;  penultimate  segment  3  times  longer  than  ultimate  segment,  with 
a  long  slender  seta  on  outer  apical  angle;  ultimate  segment  at  base  with  1  long 
slender  seta  on  inner  side  and  2  short  setae  on  apex. 

Labium  extending  as  far  forward  as  palpifer.  Penultimate  segment  of  palpus 
short.  Ultimate  segment  4  times  as  long  as  penultimate  segment,  with  2  terminal 
setae  of  unequal  length.  Ligula  distinct,  twice  as  long  as  penultimate  segment  of 
palpus,  with  2  slender  setae  arising  from  midlength.  Palpiger  rectangular,  ventrally 
2  setae  arising  just  beyond  midlength.  Mentum  wider  than  palpiger,  with  2  setae  on 
each  anterolateral  angle  and  I  seta  each  side  of  midline. 

Prothorax  broader  than  long,  with  sides  emarginate  at  apical  two-thirds,  widest  at 
midlength.  Anterior  and  lateral  margins  fringed  with  slender  setae.  Sagittal  line 
present.  Prosternal  sclerite  broader  than  long,  without  sagittal  line,  with  numerous 
setae  scattered  over  surface.  Mesothorax  slightly  wider  than  and  about  as  long  as 
prothorax;  with  2  small,  nearly  triangular,  anterior  sclerites  and  2  large,  almost  pear- 
shaped  posterior  sclerites;  lateral  margins  each  with  prominent  spiracular  tubercle, 
minute  setose  tubercle  and  3  large,  setiferous  gills  (fig.  11).  Metathorax  as  wide  as 
mesothorax;  with  2  large  sclerites,  each  bearing  a  stout  seta;  and  3  large  setiferous 
gills  as  illustrated  (fig.  3). 

Legs  4-segmented,  a  fourth  longer  than  width  of  prosternal  sclerite;  coxae  widely 
separated;  transverse  trochanter  about  half  as  long  as  coxa;  femur  about  as  long  as 
tibiotarsus;  tarsal  claw  single,  slender  seta  arising  at  middle  and  extending  to  or 
slightly  beyond  apex  of  claw. 

Abdomen  with  8  distinct  segments;  ninth  and  tenth  segments  reduced.  Segment 
1  with  pair  of  small  oval  sclerites  anteriorly.  Other  segments  without  sclerites 
and  separated  by  intersegmental  membrane.  First  segment  with  distinct  spiracular 
tubercle  and  3  large  setiferous  gills  laterally  and  1  small  setose  tubercle  on  each  side 


100 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


Figures  2-7- — Derallus  rudis  Sharp,  larva.  2 — Left  maxillary  palpus,  dorsal 
view.  3 — Habitus  view.  4 — Left  mandible,  dorsal  view.  5 — Labium,  dorsal  view. 
6 — Labroclypeus,  dorsal  view.  7 — Left  antenna,  dorsal  view. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


101 


Figures  8-11 — Derallus  rudis  Sharp,  larva.  8 — Head,  dorsal  view.  9 — Head 
ventral  view.  10 — Atrium,  dorsal  view.  11 — Mesothoracic  segment,  right  side, 
dorsal  view. 


102 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


of  midline  on  hind  margin.  Segments  2  through  6  each  with  2  folds;  first  fold 
with  1  small  setose  tubercle  and  1  large  setiferous  gill  laterally;  second  fold  with  3 
large  setiferous  gills  laterally  and  1  small  setose  tubercle  on  each  side  of  midline  on 
hind  margin  laterally.  Eighth  tergum  represented  by  superior  valve  of  stigmatic 
atrium,  a  large  subquadrangular  sclerite  with  4  appendages  on  caudal  margin  as 
illustrated  (fig.  10).  Ninth  tergum  trilobed;  middle  lobe  rectangular,  with  4  long 
setae  on  caudal  margin;  lateral  lobes  less  distinct,  with  3  setae  on  each  posterolateral 
angle.  Spiracles  present.  Mesocerci  prominent,  conical,  with  1  seta  arising  ventrally 
at  apex.  Paracerci  present,  flattened,  apices  incurved,  unsegmented  and  each  with  1 
large  and  1  minute  seta  on  apex. 

Habitat:  Derallus  larvae  were  collected  with  adult  Derallus  in  dense 
emergent  vegetation  in  a  temporary  pond  (fig.  12)  close  to  the  beach  at 
Alvarado,  Mexico. 

Other  genera  of  water  beetles  associated  with  Derallus  were:  Hydro- 
philidae — Enochrus,  Hydrophilus,  Paracymus,  Tropisternus;  Dytiscidae — 
Copelatus,  Hydrovatus,  Laccophilus,  Megadytes,  Pachydrus,  Thermonectus; 
Noteridae — Hydrocanthus,  Suphisellus ;  Dryopidae — Pelonomus. 

The  larva  of  Derallus  runs  to  the  second  rubric  of  couplet  5  in  Leech  and 
Chandler’s  (1956:339-340)  larval  key  because  the  first  antennal  segment 
is  distinctly  longer  than  the  following  two  segments  combined  (other  char¬ 
acters  in  the  rubric  are  not  all  valid  for  Derallus).  The  following  couplet 
will  separate  Derallus  from  the  other  genera  that  run  to  the  second  rubric 
in  couplet  5. 


Figure  12 — Habitat  of  Derallus  rudis  Sharp  at  Alvarado,  Veracruz,  Mexico. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


103 


Mesothorax,  mstathorax  and  abdominal  sogmont  1  each  with  3  setifsrous,  lateral 
gills;  abdominal  segments  2  through  6  each  with  four  moderately  long,  setiferous, 

lateral  gills;  femur  without  fringe  of  long  swimming  hairs - DERALLUS 

Gills  absent  or,  if  present,  with  only  a  single  lateral  gill  on  each  side  of  abdominal 

segments;  femur  with  fringe  of  long  swimming  hairs - Leech  and  Chandler's 

couplet - - -  22 

Because  of  the  urgent  need  to  get  the  Derallus  pupa  to  the  photo  lab  I 
hesitated  only  long  enough  to  count  the  styli  on  the  head  and  pronotum. 
The  pupa  had  2  styli  along  the  inner  margin  of  each  eye  and  24  styli  on 
the  pronotum. 

I  am  indebted  to  Mr.  J.  Balfour-Browne  of  the  British  Museum  for 
lending  a  male  of  Derallus  rudis  from  Sharp’s  type  series.  My  reared  male 
agrees  very  well  with  the  cotype  in  sculpture  and  in  the  distinctive  shape  of 
the  male  genitalia. 


Literature  Cited 

Bertrand,  H. 

1962.  Contribution  a  l’etude  des  premiers  etats  des  Coleopteres  aquatiques  de 
la  region  ethiopienne  (4e  note).  Famille:  Hydrophilidae  s.  lat.  (Palpi- 
corma  auct.).  Bull.  Inst.  Francais  Afr.  Noire,  Vol.  24,  Ser.  A,  No  4, 
pp.  1065-1114. 

Leech,  H.  B.  and  H.  P.  Chandler 

1956.  In  Usinger,  Aquatic  Insects  of  California  with  keys  to  North  American 
Genera  and  California  species,  ix  +  508  pp. 


LITERATURE  NOTICE 

ITINERARIES  OF  THE  WHEELER  SURVEY  NATURALISTS:  HENRY 
WETHERBEE  HENSHAW.  By  F.  M.  Brown.  lour.  Lepid.  Soc.  20(2):  71-82,  8 
tables.  1966. — Many  species  of  insects  were  collected  on  the  U.  S.  Geographical 
Surveys  West  of  the  100th  Meridian  and  were  then  described  as  new  by  entomolo¬ 
gists.  Brown  has  realized  the  importance  of  determining  more  exact  localities  than 
given  in  the  reports  or  descriptions  and  has  researched  the  itineraries.  He  previously 
reported  on  the  Wheeler  Survey  itineraries  of  Theodore  L.  Mead  (Lepid.  News 
9:185-190,  1956)  and  Ferdinand  Bischoff  (Jour.  New  York  Ent.  Soc.  65:219-234 
1957). 

CYTOLOGICAL  SPECIES-SEPARATION  IN  ASIATIC  EXOCHOMUS  (CO- 
LEOPTERA:  COCCINELLIDAE).  By  S.  G.  Smith.  Canad.  Jour.  Genetics  and  Cy¬ 
tology  7:363-373,  22  figs.  1965. — Chromosomes  of  two  species  were  studied.  The 
chromosomes  indicate  that  three  species  exist.  The  three  species  are  externally  very 
similar  or  identical.  This  study  is  a  portent  of  things  to  come — the  new  systematics. 


104 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


ELYTRAL  INTERVAL  POLYMORPHISM  IN 
ANTHONOMUS  GRANDIS  BOHEMAN  AND 
ANTHONOMUS  VESTITUS  BOHEMAN 
(COLEOPTERA:  CURCULIONIDAE)1  2 

By  Horace  R.  Burke1 2 3 

Polymorphism  of  the  4th  elytral  interval  of  Anthonomus  vestitus 
Boheman  in  Peru  was  observed  during  a  recent  taxonomic  study  of  this 
species.  Similar  polymorph  variants  were  later  found  among  specimens 
of  the  cotton  boll  weevil,  Anthonomus  grandis  Boheman,  from  North  and 
South  America.  A  preliminary  survey  of  available  material  of  these  two 
species  indicated  that  in  a  given  population  the  modifications  of  the  interval 
may  either  be  present  in  varying  degrees  or  entirely  absent.  Furthermore, 
there  is  a  definite  correlation  of  the  frequency  of  the  polymorphic  forms 
with  certain  geographic  areas.  Although  much  has  been  written  on  various 
kinds  of  polymorphism  in  insects  and  other  animals,  no  previous  mention 
of  elytral  interval  polymorphism  in  any  curculionids  appears  to  have  been 
made  in  the  literature. 

The  elytral  intervals  of  A.  grandis  and  A  vestitus  are  typically  slightly 
convex,  usually  about  equal  in  width,  and  are  clearly  delimited  by  rows 
of  punctures  commonly  called  striae  (fig.  1).  In  these  two  species  the  4th 
interval  may  also  either  be  narrowed  (fig.  2)  or  completely  interrupted 
(figs.  3,  4)  near  the  base.  Sometimes  the  striae  delimiting  the  4th  interval 
coalesce  (fig.  3)  pinching  off  the  interval,  while  in  other  cases  these  two 
striae  are  themselves  interrupted  (fig.  4)  for  a  short  distance.  In  the  latter 
instance  a  slightly  elevated  bridge  connects  the  3rd  and  5th  intervals.  The 
effect  produced  by  either  of  the  latter  two  modifications  is  a  complete 
interruption  of  the  4th  interval.  Both  elytra  of  an  individual  are  usually 
similarly  affected  whenever  there  is  any  deviation  from  the  normal  form. 
However,  many  instances  were  noted  where  the  4th  interval  of  one  elytron 
was  interrupted  while  the  same  interval  on  the  opposite  elytron  was  only 
narrowed  or,  less  frequently,  normal.  Striae  bordering  the  4th  interval 
may  coalesce  on  one  elytron  and  be  completely  interrupted  on  the 
opposite  elytron.  The  frequency  of  occurrence  of  these  morphs  was 
observed  to  be  approximately  the  same  in  both  sexes. 

In  the  following  discussion  on  A.  grandis  only  interrupted  interval 
morphs  are  considered.  Narrowed  interval  morphs  do  not  appear  to  be  as 
common  in  this  species  as  in  certain  populations  of  A.  vestitus.  It  should 
be  noted  here  that  an  individual  was  counted  as  an  interrupted  interval 
morph  if  it  had  either  one  or  both  4th  intervals  interrupted. 

The  highest  incidence  of  elytral  interval  interruption  in  A.  grandis 
occurs  in  Texas,  the  southeastern  United  States,  and  Venezuela.  All  samples 

1  Technical  contribution  No.  5349,  Department  of  Entomology,  Texas  Agricul¬ 
tural  Experiment  Station,  Texas  A&M  University,  College  Station,  Texas. 

2  This  study  was  financed  in  part  by  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture  Research 
and  Service  Contract  #12-14-100-7733(33). 

3  Department  of  Entomology,  Texas  A&M  University,  College  Station,  Texas. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


105 


examined  from  these  areas  contained  some  interrupted  interval  morphs, 
although  the  frequency  of  these  morphs  varied  considerably  between  the 
various  localities.  Percentages  of  interrupted  interval  morphs  collected 
on  cultivated  cotton  from  localities  within  these  areas  are  as  follows  (num¬ 
ber  of  specimens  examined  in  parentheses):  Orangeburg  Co.,  S.  C.,  20.8 
(72) ;  Issaquena  Co.,  Miss.,  12.3  (57) ;  Fayetteville,  Ark.,  27.4  (73);  Okla¬ 
homa,  22.6  (31);  Dickens  Co.,  Tex.,  17.9  (56);  Falls  Co.,  Tex.,  9.7 
(103);  Collingsworth  Co.,  Tex.,  12.9  (70);  Runnels  Co.,  Tex.,  5.7  (70); 
Hardeman  Co.,  Tex.,  9.8  (61);  El  Paso,  Tex.,  40.0  (15);  Brownsville, 
Tex.,  3.2  (62);  and  Venezuela,  20.5  (44).  A  sample  of  12  weevils  reared 
from  Cienjuegosia  sulphured  in  Nueces  Co.,  Tex.,  contained  33.3%  inter¬ 
rupted  interval  morphs.  The  frequency  of  interrupted  interval  morphs  in 
a  sample  from  Venezuela  is  comparable  with  that  found  in  some  areas 
in  the  southeastern  United  States.  This  along  with  certain  other  similar¬ 
ities  in  weevils  from  these  two  areas  suggests  that  probably  weevils  now 
attacking  cotton  in  Venezuela  developed  from  one  or  more  fairly  recent 
introductions  from  the  southeastern  United  States. 


Considerably  fewer  interrupted  interval  morphs  were  usually  found 
in  samples  from  northeastern  and  north-central  Mexico  as  compared  with 
the  frequency  of  this  variant  in  most  populations  in  adjacent  Texas.  The 
percentages  of  interrupted  interval  morphs  collected  on  cultivated  cotton 
from  various  localities  in  these  areas  in  Mexico  are  as  follows: Valadeces, 
Tamps.,  11.1  (36);  Tampico,  Tamps.,  3.6  (56);  near  Monterry,  N.  L., 
4.1  (74);  Rio  Nazas,  Dgo.,  1.5  (67);  and  Delicias  area,  Chih.,  0.0  (69). 
It  is  of  interest  that  the  study  of  other  characters  of  the  species,  such  as 
the  spermatheca,  scutellum,  metepisternum  and  pronotal  setae,  indicates 


Figures  1-4 — Anthonomus  grandis  Boheman,  left  elytron  of  elytral  interval  morphs 
from  Fayetteville,  Arkansas.  1 — Normal  4th  elytral  interval.  2 — Narrowed  4th 
elytral  interval.  3 — Interrupted  4th  elytral  interval,  with  striae  coalescing.  4 — 
Interrupted  4th  elytral  interval,  with  striae  interrupted. 


106 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


that  northeastern  and  north-central  Mexico  apparently  represents  a  transi¬ 
tional  zone  between  weevils  farther  south  in  Mexico  and  those  of  Texas. 

Several  samples  of  weevils  from  cultivated  cotton  in  Arizona,  Sonora, 
and  Sinaloa  were  examined  but  only  three  of  these  contained  individuals 
with  interrupted  intervals.  The  percentages  of  these  morphs  in  the  three 
samples  are:  Hyder,  Ariz.,  4.7  (86);  Caborca,  Son.,  1.3  (80);  and 
Guasave,  Sin.,  1.5  (69).  No  interrupted  interval  morphs  occurred  in  two 
samples  totaling  185  weevils  collected  on  Gossypium  thurberi  in  Arizona. 
Available  material  from  cultivated  cotton  in  El  Salvador,  Honduras  and 
Nicaragua  also  did  not  include  any  of  these  morphs. 

Interrupted  interval  morphs  of  Anthonomus  vestitus  Boheman  constitute 
only  a  small  proportion  of  weevils  examined  from  cultivated  cotton  in  the 
Peruvian  departments  of  Lima  and  La  Libertad,  and  appear  not  to  occur 
at  all  in  the  more  northern  departments  of  Piura,  Amazonas  and  Lam- 
bayeque.  The  percentages  of  these  morphs  in  material  examined  were  re¬ 
corded  as  follows:  Canete,  Lima,  6.0  (100);  Pativilca,  Lima,  2.2  (45); 
and  La  Libertad,  2.6  (38).  Narrowed  interval  morphs  were  observed 
by  H.  R.  Burke  and  W.  H.  Cross  (unpublished  data)  to  occur  in  all  of 
the  Peruvian  departments  from  which  sufficient  samples  were  available, 
but  the  frequency  of  these  variants  was  much  higher  in  the  more  southern 
departments  of  Lima  and  lea.  The  percentages  of  narrowed  interval  morphs 
in  samples  from  departments  arranged  from  north  to  south  in  Peru  are: 
Piura,  1.8  (56);  Amazonas,  28.0  (25);  Lambayeque,  5.2  (19);  La 
Libertad,  8.6  (35);  Lima,  65.3  (95);  and  lea,  57.1  (14). 

Small  numbers  of  a  few  other  species  of  Anthonomus  were  examined 
but  Anthonomus  fulvus  LeConte  was  the  only  one  of  these  found  to  possess 
elytral  interval  polymorphism.  Two  out  of  25  specimens  of  the  latter 
species  exhibited  the  same  type  of  polymorphism  as  A.  grandis  and  A. 
vestitus. 

The  foregoing  account  of  elytral  interval  polymorphism  in  A.  grandis 
and  A.  vestitus  is  preliminary.  The  objectives  here  were  to  show  that 
such  polymorphism  exists  and  to  point  out  the  correlation  between  inci¬ 
dence  of  these  polymorph  variants  and  geographic  areas.  Elytral  interval 
polymorphism  is  presently  being  used  by  the  author  as  an  additional 
factor  in  evaluating  geographic  variation  in  the  two  species  and  may  be 
of  some  value  in  future  studies  on  their  genetics.  Information  derived 
from  field  and  laboratory  studies  is  now  needed  as  a  basis  for  attempting 
to  determine  the  nature  and  significance  of  this  phenomenon. 


LITERATURE  NOTICE 

EGG  BURSTERS  AND  HATCHING  IN  THE  CERAMBYCIDAE  (COLEOP- 

TERA).  By  L.  M.  Gardiner.  Canad.  Jour.  Zool.  44:  199-212,  57  figs.  1966. _ Form 

and  occurrence  of  so-called  egg  bursters  on  first  instar  larvae  of  40  species  are  dis¬ 
cussed.  Studies  of  these  structures  in  relation  to  hatching  show  that  they  perform  an 
important  ambulatory,  as  well  as  egg  bursting,  function.  It  is  proposed  that  they 
should  be  more  appropriately  termed  “hatching  spines.” 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


107 


TRACHYPACHUS  AND  THE  ORIGIN  OF  THE 
HYDRADEPHAGA  (COLEOPTERA)1 

By  Ross  T.  Bell2-3 

The  specialized  aquatic  families  of  the  Suborder  Adephaga  have  often 
been  united  to  form  a  Superfamily  Hydradephaga,  while  the  terrestrial 
families  are  included  in  a  contrasting  Superfamily  Geadephaga.  Basic 
to  an  understanding  of  the  phylogeny  of  the  Adephaga  is  a  decision  as 
to  whether  this  separation  is  a  natural  one.  In  other  words,  have  the 
Hydradephaga  arisen  from  a  primitive  adephagan  different  from  that 
which  gave  rise  to  the  Geadephaga,  or  are  the  Hydradephaga  simply 
Geadephaga  modified  for  an  aquatic  existence? 

Available  evidence  overwhelmingly  supports  the  latter  view.  Crowson 
(1955)  held  that  the  basic  features  of  the  adephagan  metasternum,  hind 
coxae,  and  abdomen  were  originally  adaptations  for  life  beneath  bark; 
while  Bell  and  Bell  (1962)  suggested  that  they  were,  instead,  adaptations 
for  cursorial  locomotion.  In  either  case,  there  is  nothing  in  the  structure 
of  Hydradephaga  to  preclude  descent  from  early  geadephagans.  More¬ 
over,  the  characters  supposedly  distinguishing  the  two  groups  are  not 
entirely  constant.  All  Hydradephaga  lack  pubescence  on  the  outer  anten¬ 
nal  segments,  but  it  is  also  lacking  in  the  terrestrial  Trachypachini 
( Trachypachus  Motschulsky  and  Systolosoma  Sober).  Hydradephaga  are 
often  said  to  lack  a  transverse  sulcus  on  the  metasternum.  In  Hygrobiidae, 
however,  there  is  a  remnant  of  the  sulcus,  while  in  Haliplidae  it  is  repre¬ 
sented  by  a  row  of  coarse  punctures.  On  the  other  hand,  the  aberrant, 
bark-inhabiting  Rhysodini  (usually  accorded  family  rank,  but  regarded 
as  modified  Carabidae  by  Bell  and  Bell,  1962)  lack  a  transverse  sulcus. 
The  sulcus  is  the  external  opening  to  an  internal  ridge,  evidently  serving 
for  muscle  attachments;  and  its  tendency  to  disappear  in  Hydradephaga 
and  Rhysodini  is  probably  a  reflection  of  changes  in  methods  of  loco¬ 
motion. 

All  Hydradephaga  have  hind  coxal  cavities  of  the  interrupted  type,  in 
which  the  hind  coxa  extends  laterally  to  the  margin  of  the  body,  eliminating 
contact  between  the  metathoracic  pleurites  and  the  first  abdominal 
sternite.  Coxal  cavities  of  this  type  occur  also  in  Trachypachini  and  in 
Gehringia  among  terrestrial  Adephaga.  In  the  latter  genus,  this  feature 
seems  to  be  connected  with  the  lateral  displacement  of  the  hind  legs, 
while  in  Trachypachini  and  the  Hydradephaga  it  is  necessitated  by  the 
great  enlargement  of  the  coxae  themselves. 

Hydradephaga  universally  lack  an  antenna-cleaning  organ  on  the 
anterior  tibia.  A  secondary  loss  of  this  structure  would  be  expected,  how- 


1  This  research  was  supported  by  Grant  No.  G 19378  from  the  National  Science 
Foundation. 

2  Department  of  Zoology,  University  of  Vermont,  Burlington,  Vermont  05401. 

3  I  am  indebted  to  Philip  J.  Darlington,  Jr.,  George  E.  Ball,  and  J.  Gordon 
Edwards  for  the  specimens  used  in  this  study,  and  to  my  wife,  Joyce  R.  Bell,  for  the 
dissections  and  drawings. 


108 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


ever,  in  the  aquatic  environment,  where  antennae  are  unlikely  to  become 
soiled.  It  has  also  been  lost  in  the  terrestrial  Paussini,  which  have  highly 
modified  antennae  unsuited  to  an  antenna  cleaner.  Specialized  tactile 
setae  are  apparently  universal  among  Geadephaga,  while  they  are  some¬ 
times  said  to  be  absent  in  Hydradephaga.  Loss  of  tactile  setae  is  a 
change  that  one  would  expect  in  a  geadephagous  beetle  adapted  for  life 
in  water,  since  such  setae  would  increase  friction  during  swimming.  In 
Haliplus  triopsis  Say,  however,  there  is  a  pair  of  well-developed  tactile 
setae  on  the  mentum,  much  like  those  of  most  Carabidae.  Remnants  of 
the  system  of  tactile  setae  should  be  searched  for  in  the  other  families 
of  Hydradephaga. 

If  it  is  concluded  that  Hydradephaga  have  arisen  from  the  Geadephaga, 
the  next  question  is  whether  they  represent  a  single  invasion  of  the 
aquatic  habitat,  or  multiple  invasions.  In  other  words,  are  the  Hydra¬ 
dephaga  a  monophyletic  group?  Strong  contrasts  in  the  adaptations  for 
aquatic  life  in  both  larvae  and  adults  suggest  that  three  separate  invasions 
occurred.  (Crowson,  1955,  and  Leech  and  Chandler,  1956,  discuss  these 
adaptations.)  Dytiscidae,  Hygrobiidae,  Amphizoidae,  and  Noteridae 
(often  included  in  Dytiscidae)  seem  to  form  a  monophyletic  group.  In 
these  families  the  larva  has  lost  the  apical  portion  of  the  abdomen,  the 
ninth  segment  being  vestigial  or  absent.  In  most  species,  the  larva 
breathes  air  at  the  surface  through  the  enlarged  spiracles  of  the  eighth 
abdominal  segment.  (In  Noteridae,  the  abdomen  is  secondarily  adapted 
for  piercing  air  spaces  in  the  stems  of  aquatic  plants;  in  Hygrobiidae  and 
in  the  dytiscid  Coptotomus  Say,  there  are  tracheal  gills  on  the  abdomen; 
in  Hydroporinae  neither  gills  nor  functional  spiracles  are  present,  and 
respiration  is  apparently  cutaneous.  All  of  these  exceptional  groups  have 
an  abbreviated  abdomen,  suggesting  derivation  from  a  species  which 
breathed  at  the  surface.) 

In  Gyrinidae,  in  striking  contrast,  the  larval  abdomen  is  much  like 
that  of  Carabidae,  the  tenth  segment  forming  a  well-developed  pygopod 
armed  with  hooks.  The  urogomphi  are  well  developed.  Each  abdominal 
segment  (except  the  tenth  and,  sometimes,  the  ninth)  has  a  pair  of 
lateral  tracheal  gills.  The  spiracles  of  the  eighth  segment  are  not  en¬ 
larged,  and  the  spiracles  are  not  used  at  all  except,  perhaps,  when  the 
larva  emerges  on  land  to  pupate.  The  larvae  have  a  strong  similiarity 
to  those  of  Corydalidae  (Order  Megalop tera) .  For  this  reason,  Bradley 
(1930)  suggested  that  the  Gyrinidae  should  be  regarded  as  the  most 
primitive  living  beetles.  It  seems  more  likely,  in  view  of  the  highly 
specialized  nature  of  adult  Gyrinidae,  that  the  larvae  show  a  strong  de¬ 
gree  of  evolutionary  convergence  with  those  of  Corydalidae.  Gyrinid 
larvae,  in  any  case,  show  no  convincing  evidence  of  relationship  to  the 
preceding  families  (which  will  be  referred  to  for  brevity  as  the  “dytiscoid” 
families). 

In  the  Haliplidae,  the  spiracles  are  not  used  in  larval  respiration, 
oxygen  being  obtained  directly  through  the  skin,  in  some  cases  supple¬ 
mented  by  scattered,  rodlike  outgrowths  of  the  body  wall.  Although  the 
tip  of  the  abdomen  is  somewhat  reduced  (the  urogomphi  are  absent,  and 
the  tenth  segment,  if  present,  is  only  a  vestige,  not  forming  a  pygopod), 
it  is  less  so  than  in  the  dytiscoid  families.  The  spiracles  of  the  eighth 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


109 


segment  are  not  enlarged.  The  spiracles,  according  to  Crowson,  are  not 
used  except  possibly  in  the  last  instar  of  some  species.  The  haliplid 
larva,  like  the  gyrinid  one,  appears  far  more  likely  to  have  evolved 
directly  from  a  terrestrial  form  than  from  a  larva  of  the  dytiscoid  type. 

The  aquatic  adaptations  of  the  adult  Hydradephaga  support  the  thesis 
of  three  separate  invasions.  The  Haliplidae  are  unique  in  having  large 
platelike  extensions  of  the  hind  coxae,  which  more  or  less  conceal  the 
abdominal  sternites,  and  which  form  an  air  storage  chamber.  On  the 
other  hand,  the  legs  of  Haliplidae  are  scarcely  modified  for  swimming, 
except  for  the  presence  of  a  row  of  swimming  hairs  on  the  tibia. 

In  the  dytiscoid  families,  with  the  exception  of  Amphizoidae,  the 
front  and  middle  legs  play  no  part  in  swimming,  being  adapted  for  cling¬ 
ing  to  objects,  grasping  prey,  and  climbing  emergent  vegetation  prepara¬ 
tory  to  flight.  The  hind  legs  are  highly  adapted  as  paddles,  being 
elongate,  more-or-less  compressed,  and  fringed  with  stiff  swimming  hairs. 
In  Amphizoidae,  the  legs  are  closer  to  a  typical  geadephagous  type.  The 
hind  tarsi  are  scarcely  compressed,  and  their  claws  are  large  and  diver¬ 
gent.  All  three  pairs  of  legs  are  used  in  walking  on  the  bottom  of  cold, 
swift  mountain  streams.  According  to  Edwards  (1951),  the  hind  legs 
show  vestiges  of  swimming  hairs,  suggesting  derivation  from  a  swimming 
dytiscoid  ancestor.  Since  amphizoids  live  in  a  habitat  where  swimming 
is  hazardous,  a  secondary  loss  of  swimming  adaptations  would  not  be 
surprising. 

The  Gyrinidae  are  unique  in  that  both  middle  and  hind  legs  are 
adapted  for  swimming,  while  the  front  legs  are  highly  specialized  grasp¬ 
ing  organs.  Moreover,  the  legs  are  adapted  as  paddles  in  a  manner  com¬ 
pletely  different  from  that  of  the  dytiscoids.  Each  tibia  has  a  broad,  thin 
expansion  on  its  outer  margin.  The  distal  margin  of  the  expansion  con¬ 
tains  a  deep  slot  into  which  the  upper  margin  of  the  tarsus  is  fitted.  The 
tarsus,  which  is  extremely  short  and  compressed,  can  be  disengaged  from 
the  slot,  a  feature  which  might  facilitate  its  use  in  terrestrial  locomotion. 

The  anatomy  of  both  adults  and  larvae,  then,  favors  the  theory  of  three 
separate  invasions  of  the  aquatic  habitat.  To  what  group  of  terrestrial 
Adephaga  is  each  of  these  phyletic  lines  most  closely  related?  Among 
the  Carabidae,  the  Trachypachini  show  the  most  points  in  common  with 
the  Hydradephaga.  It  is  worth  considering,  therefore,  whether  this  tribe 
is  really  related  to  any  or  all  of  the  Hydradephaga.  There  have  been  two 
sharply  contrasting  theories  about  the  relationships  of  Trachypachini 
in  recent  years.  Jeannel  (1941)  placed  Trachypachini  with  Metriini, 
Ozaenini,  Paussini,  and  Gehringiini  in  a  major  subdivision  of  the  Cara¬ 
bidae,  the  Series  Isochaeta.  (Jeannel  ranked  the  above  tribes  as  families, 
and  elevated  the  Carabidae  to  the  rank  of  superfamily.  Since  most  other 
workers  have  not  accepted  the  change  in  ranks,  it  will  minimize  con¬ 
fusion  if  his  rank  changes  are  not  adopted  in  this  discussion.)  Crowson 
(1955),  on  the  other  hand,  has  given  the  Trachypachini  family  status 
and  has  regarded  it  as  intermediate  between  the  Geadephaga  and  Hydra¬ 
dephaga. 

Jeannel’s  theory  is  supported  by  the  structure  of  the  antenna  cleaner 
of  Trachypachus.  It  is  of  the  typical  isochaetous  type,  in  the  form  of  an 


no 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


emargination  of  the  inner  face  of  the  anterior  tibia,  with  both  tibial  spurs 
distal  to  it.  (In  the  vast  majority  of  Carabidae  the  antenna  cleaner  lies 
between  the  tibial  spurs,  and  the  posterior  spur  is  more  or  less  displaced 
proximally.)  It  agrees  closely  with  the  antenna  cleaner  of  Metriini  and 
Ozaenini.  (Paussini,  despite  the  absence  of  a  well-developed  antenna 
cleaner,  are  placed  in  the  Isochaeta  because  there  is  other  evidence  for  a 
relationship  with  Ozaenini — see  Darlington  (1950);  Gehringiini  do  not 
have  a  typical  isochaetous  antenna  cleaner  and  are  probably  not  Isochaeta 
at  all — see  Bell  (1964).)  A  further  point  of  similarity  between  Trachy- 
pachini  and  the  other  Isochaeta  is  the  presence  of  about  twelve,  rather 
than  six,  tactile  setae  on  the  labrum  (Bell,  1964).  To  my  knowledge,  a 
doubling  of  the  labral  setae  has  not  occurred  in  any  other  group  of 
Adephaga  in  which  the  mouthparts  are  unspecialized.  It  does  occur 
among  Cicindelini,  or  at  least  some  of  them.  In  the  latter  group,  how¬ 
ever,  the  mouthparts,  including  the  labrum,  are  strikingly  different  from 
those  of  other  Adephaga.  At  any  rate,  the  doubling  of  the  labral  setae 
is  not  obviously  functionally  related  to  the  structure  of  the  antenna 
cleaner,  and  the  two  characters  together  make  a  strong  case  for  placing 
Trachypaclms  among  the  Isochaeta. 

Two  functionally  unrelated  characters,  the  absence  of  antennal  pubes¬ 
cence  and  the  presence  of  hind  coxal  cavities  of  the  interrupted  type, 
make  a  case  for  relating  Trachypaclms  to  the  Hydradephaga.  The  first 


Figures  1-4.  Left  anterior  coxal  cavity,  viewed  obliquely.  1 — Haliplus  triopsis  Say 
(Haliplidae).  2 — Amphizoa  insolens  Lee.  (Amphizoidae).  3 — Dineutes  discolor  Aube 
(Gyrinidae).  4 — Trachypaclms  gibbsi  Lee.  (Carabidae). 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


111 


character  is  iestricted  to  the  groups  mentioned;  the  second  is  shared 
only  with  the  Gehringiini.  I  have  discovered  a  third  character  to  be  added 
to  the  list:  in  Trachypachus,  as  in  all  Hydradephaga  so  far  dissected 
(Haliplus,  Amphizoa,  Agabus,  Laccophilus,  and  Dineutes ),  there  is  a 
similar  type  of  anterior  coxal  cavity  (figs.  1-4).  All  have  a  postcoxal 
budge,  a  thin  bridge  of  sclerotized  exoskeleton  immediately  posterior  to 
the  opening  between  the  prothorax  and  coxa.  This  structure  should  not 
be  confused  with  a  postcoxal  bar,  which  is  found  in  those  Adephaga  with 
closed  coxal  cavities.  A  bridge  is  part  of  the  primary  body  wall  and  there¬ 
fore  consists  of  a  single  thickness  of  exoskeleton.  It  is  entirely  hidden 
unless  the  coxa  is  removed  from  the  cavity.  A  bar  consists  of  two  tubular 
outgrowths  of  the  body  wall  united  at  their  tips,  one  from  the  proepimeron 
and  the  other  from  the  prosternum.  It  is  heavily  sclerotized  and  is  visible 
externally.  (I  shall  publish  an  extensive  paper  on  the  coxal  cavities  of 
Adephaga  in  the  near  future;  a  preliminary  report  (Bell,  1965)  on  this 
work  has  already  been  published.)  Many  Carabidae  have  both  a  bridge 
and  a  bar  (Carabidae  Biperforatae  as  defined  by  Sloane,  1923);  but 
Trachypachus  is  the  only  carabid  in  which  the  bridge  occurs  without  the 
bar,  i.e.,  with  open  coxal  cavaties.  Thus  there  are  three  apparently 
unrelated  characters  shared  by  Trachypachus  and  the  Hydradephaga, 
indicating  the  likelihood  of  a  common  ancestry. 

Lindroth  (1960)  discovered  the  larva  of  Trachypachus  gibbsi  Lee.  It 
is  a  typical  terrestrial  adephagous  larva,  living  in  dry  sand  and  without 
any  aquatic  adaptations.  The  only  feature  it  seems  to  share  with  the 
larvae  of  Hydradephaga  is  the  absence  of  a  ligula  on  the  labium.  A  ligula 
is  also  absent  in  various  terrestrial  larvae,  including  Brachinus,  Lebia, 
Gehringia,  and  Rhysodini.  Lindroth  considered  that  the  terrestrial  nature 
of  the  larva  precluded  any  relationship  with  the  Hydradephaga,  and  that 
the  absence  of  the  ligula,  together  with  the  incomplete  hind  coxal  cavities 
of  the  adult,  was  evidence  of  relationship  to  Gehringia.  For  reasons 
stated  above,  I  doubt  the  relationship  of  Gehringia  to  the  Isochaeta,  and 
that  the  absence  of  a  ligula  is  significant  evidence  for  it,  since  the  ligula 
has  been  lost  in  many  groups  of  Adephaga.  The  terrestrial  character  of 
the  larva  does  not  preclude  relationship  to  the  Hydradephaga,  but  it 
does  suggest  that  Trachypachus  is  not  descended  from  fully  aquatic  an¬ 
cestors.  This  is  consistent  with  the  evidence  previously  presented,  that 
the  Hydradephaga  made  three  separate  invasions  of  the  water. 

The  most  reasonable  explanation  of  the  origin  and  relationships  of 
the  Hydradephaga  is  as  follows: 

L  The  Hydradephaga  do  not  constitute  an  independent  phyletic  line 
of  Adephaga,  but  are  Isochaeta  modified  for  an  aquatic  existence.  As  in 
the  case  of  the  Paussini,  this  is  not  indicated  by  the  possession  of  obvious 
isochaetous  characters,  but  rather  by  clear  indications  of  relationship 
to  an  undoubted  member  of  the  Isochaeta. 

2.  The  Hydradephaga  represent  three  phyletic  lines:  the  Haliplidae, 
Gyrinidae,  and  the  complex  of  dytiscoid  families.  Each  of  these  lines  be¬ 
came  adapted  for  aquatic  life  independently.  Each  of  these  lines  is  as 
closely  related  to  Trachypachini  as  it  is  to  the  other  lines.  Hydra¬ 
dephaga  is  therefore  not  a  natural  group  unless  it  is  defined  so  as  to  in- 


112 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


elude  Trachypachini.  In  this  case,  the  name  is  inappropriate  and  mis¬ 
leading.  I  suggest  the  substitution  of  “Glabricornia,”  based  on  the  lack 
of  antennal  pubescence,  the  most  obvious  common  character  of  the  group. 

3.  The  common  ancestor  of  the  Glabricornia  was  a  terrestrial,  iso- 
chaetous  adephagan,  with  open,  bridged  anterior  coxal  cavities  and  in¬ 
complete  posterior  ones,  and  with  glabrous  antennal  segments.  In  all 
important  characters  it  resembled  the  modern  Trachypachus.  The  larva 
was  a  typical  terrestrial  adephagous  larva  (except,  perhaps,  in  having 
lost  the  ligula).  Although  both  adult  and  larva  were  certainly  not  aquatic, 
they  may  have  been  more  hygrophilous  than  the  living  species  of  Trachy¬ 
pachus. 

4.  Trachypachus  is  an  extraordinary  phylogenetic  relict,  having  sur¬ 
vived  almost  unchanged  from  the  time  of  origin  of  the  Glabricornia.  The 
Chilean  Systolosoma  should  be  investigated  to  see  if  it  is  really  closely 
related  to  Trachypachus,  or  if  it  represents  an  independent  line  of  per¬ 
sistently  terrestrial  Glabricornia. 

It  would  require  a  wholesale  rearrangement  of  the  formal  classification 
of  the  Adephaga  to  make  it  express  accurately  the  interrelationships  of 
the  Isochaeta  and  the  Glabricornia.  Eventually  it  will  be  desirable  to  do 
so.  At  present,  the  interrelationships  of  terrestrial  Adephaga  are  poorly 
understood  and  frequently  debated.  I  decline,  therefore,  to  propose  any 
changes  in  family  boundaries  at  the  present  time. 


Literature  Cited 

Bell,  R.  T. 

1964.  Does  Gehringia  belong  to  the  Isochaeta?  Coleop.  Bull.  18(2):  59-61. 

1965.  Coxal  cavities  and  the  phylogeny  of  the  Adephaga.  Proc.  XII  Int.  Congr. 
Ent.:  80-81. 

Bell,  R.  T.,  and  J.  R.  Bell. 

1962.  The  taxonomic  position  of  the  Rhysodidae.  Coleop.  Bull.  16(4):  99-106. 
Bradley,  J.  C. 

1930.  Manual  of  Genera  of  Beetles  in  America  North  of  Mexico.  Ithaca,  N.  Y. 
360  pp. 

Crowson,  R.  A. 

1955.  The  Natural  Classification  of  the  Families  of  Coleoptera.  N.  Lloyd  Co., 
Ltd.,  London.  187  pp. 

Darlington,  P.  J.,  Jr. 

1950.  Paussid  beetles.  Trans.  Amer.  Ent.  Soc.  76:  47-142. 

Edwards,  J.  G. 

1951.  Amphizoidae  of  the  world.  Wasmann  Jour.  Biol.  8:  303-332. 

Jeannel,  R. 

1941.  Coleopteres  carabiques.  Faune  de  France,  39:  1-571. 

Leech,  H.  B.,  and  H.  G.  Chandler. 

1956.  Coleoptera,  pp.  293-371.  In  R.  L.  Usinger,  Aquatic  Insects  of  California, 
University  of  California  Press,  508  pp.,  Berkeley  and  Los  Angeles. 

Lindroth,  C.  H. 

1960.  The  larvae  of  Trachypachus,  Gehringia,  and  Opisthius.  Opusc.  Ent.  25: 
30-42. 

Sloane,  T.  G. 

1923.  The  classification  of  the  family  Carabidae.  Trans.  Roy.  Soc.  London 
1923:  234-250. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


113 


LARVAE  OF  TWO  SPECIES  OF  GENUS  HETERONYCHUS 
FROM  NIGERIA  (DYNASTINAE:  SCAR AB AEIDAE : 

COLEOPTERA) 

By  M.  L.  Jerath1’  2 


Several  species  of  the  genus  Heteronychus  are  of  great  importance  to 
the  agriculturist  in  many  parts  of  Africa  and  Australia.  Extensive  damage 
to  sugar  cane,  maize,  rice,  wheat  and  many  other  crops  caused  by  adults, 
and  sometimes  by  larvae,  has  been  reported  by  several  writers  (Le  Pelley 
and  Goddard,  1952;  Valle  y  March,  1954;  Jepson,  1956  and  Britten, 
1959).  The  adults  usually  spend  a  greater  part  of  their  life  underground 
and  damage  the  tap  roots,  stem  bases,  tubers  (potatoes)  and  the  cuttings, 
young  shoots  and  ratoon  canes  of  sugar  cane. 

In  Nigeria,  H.  licas  (Klug)  damage  yams  ( Dioscoria  spp.)  and  sugar 
cane.  The  damage  to  sugar  cane  is  very  severe  at  Bacita,  Northern  Nigeria, 
and  is  caused  by  both  adults  and  larvae. 

African  Dynastid  larvae  are  rather  poorly  known  as  the  only  Dynastid 
larvae  described  to  date  are  Oryctes  boas  (F.),  Temnorhynchus  coronatus 
(F.),  (Oberholzer,  1959  and  1963)  and  Heteroligus  meles  (Billb.) 
(Jerath  and  Unny,  1963). 

In  this  paper,  the  biology  of  Heteronychus  spp.  is  briefly  outlined, 
the  larvae  of  H.  licas  and  H.  fossor  Reiche  described,  a  key  presented 
for  the  separation  of  the  larvae  of  two  species  of  Heteronychus  characterized 
and  compared  with  other  Dynastid  larvae. 


Biology 

In  Nigeria,  Heteronychus  licas  and  H.  oryzae  cause  damage  to  sugar 
cane  at  Bacita,  Northern  Nigeria,  where  a  10,000  acre  sugar  cane 
plantation  is  being  established.  The  beetles  chew  the  sugar  cane  stem 
and  cause  dead  hearts.  The  attack  is  severe  in  newly  planted  cane  fields. 
Larvae  usually  feed  on  the  grass  and  sugar  cane  roots. 

In  Nigeria,  Heteronychus  spp.  have  one  generation  with  two  nocturnal 
flight  periods  a  year.  The  first  flight  or  post-teneral  flight  occurs  during 
the  period  April  to  early  June  when  the  beetles  distribute  themselves  in 
the  field  and  are  commonly  seen  feeding  at  ground  level  on  the  young  tillers. 

During  June  to  August  beetles  usually  burrow  to  a  depth  of  12  to  18 
inches  and  rest.  They  again  come  up  in  September  and  feed  on  the  new 


1  Federal  Department  of  Agricultural  Research,  Moor  Plantation,  Ibadan,  Nigeria. 

2  Thanks  are  due  to  Mr.  G.  E.  O.  Okiy,  Director  of  Agricultural  Research, 
for  his  keen  interest  in  this  work  and  also  to  Mr.  J.  E.  Y.  Hardcastle,  Ag.  Director, 
for  permission  to  publish  the  paper. 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


1  14 

tillers.  By  this  time  many  beetles  are  seen  mating.  The  second  flight  or 
pre-reproductive  flight  occurs  during  the  period  October  to  December. 
Oviposition  begins  by  mid-September  and  eggs  are  laid  in  the  wet  soil 
around  the  sugar  cane  stool.  The  eggs  hatch  in  9  to  12  days  and  the 
larval  stages  are  commonly  found  from  late  September  until  late  February 
or  early  March  when  newly  emerged  adults  make  their  appearance. 


Larval  Taxonomy 

Larvae  of  the  genus  Heteronychus  may  be  characterized  as  follows:  Surface  of 
cranium  reticulate.  Ocelli  present.  Lateral  margin  of  labrum  (and  epipharynx) 
angulate  posteriorly  especially  on  the  left  side.  Antenna  four-segmented,  first 
and  third  segments  subequal  and  each  smaller  than  second  segment;  the  fourth 
segment  fusiform  and  bearing  a  single  sensory  spot  dorsally  and  two  sensory  spots 
ventrally.  Left  mandible  with  S1+9,  Ss  and  S4  and  right  mandible  with  S1+9 
and  S3+4.  Stipes  of  maxilla  with  a  longitudinal  row  of  7  to  9  blunt,  truncate,  stridula- 
toiy  teeth  and  a  distal  blunt  tubercle.  Abdominal  spiracles  on  segments  one  to  seven 
inclusive  equal  in  size  and  that  of  segment  eight  much  smaller.  Abdominal 
segments  1  to  6,  each  with  three  dorsal  annulets  and  dorsa  of  segments 
7  to  10  undivided;  dorsa  of  segments  1  to  6  with  numerous  rows  of  setae;  those 
of  segment  7  to  9  are  with  two  rows  of  setae,  one  row  placed  anteriorly  and  the 
other  posteriorly.  Raster  with  a  teges  consisting  of  a  broad  patch  of  prominent 
hamate  setae;  lower  anal  lip  with  similar  hamate  setae;  palidia  absent.  Two  setae 
on  each  claw. 

The  larvae  of  genus  Heteronychus  agree  with  the  American  Dynastid 
larvae  in  the  essential  characters  given  by  Richter  (1944).  However,  the 
larvae  of  Heteronychus  differs  from  Oryctes  boas  and  Heteroligus  meles 
in  having  one  dorsal  sensory  spot  on  the  last  antennal  segment,  and  also 
differs  from  Temnorhynchus  coronatus,  in  that  the  last  abdominal  spiracle 
is  much  smaller  than  the  other  spiracles. 


Key  to  the  Larvae  of  the  Two  Species  of  Heteronychus 

Right  and  left  chaetoparia  of  epipharynx  with  many  rows  of  setae;  lateral  face  of 

each  mandible  with  7  to  8  setae,  scrobis  with  one  to  two  setae  (fig.  4) - LICAS 

Left  chaetoparia  with  one  row  of  setae  (fig.  8);  lateral  face  of  each  mandible 
with  four  setae;  scrobis  with  one  to  two  setae  (fig.  5) - F0SS0R 

Heteronychus  licas  (Klug).  Third-stage  larva. 

(Figs.  1-5,  7,  9,  12  and  13) 

Material  studied:  (a)  Two  third-stage  larvae  collected  from  sugar  cane 
fields  at  Bacita  during  December  1964.  The  reared  adults  were  identified 
by  the  Commonwealth  Institute  of  Entomology,  London. 

(b)  Three-stage  larvae  reared  from  the  eggs  laid  in  the  laboratory  by 

beetles  collected  from  sugar  cane  fields  at  Bacita,  Northern  Nigeria  during 
1964.  ’  0 

Description:  Maximum  width  of  head  capsule  of  third-stage  larvae  ranging  from 
•.u  IS  5-31  Cranium  reddish  brown  with  many  pits.  Frons,  on  each  side, 

with  thiee  anterior  frontal  setae,  one  long  and  three  short  posterior  frontal  setae, 
one  short  and  two  long  setae  in  each  anterior  angle  and  one  long  and  two  short 
exterior  frontal  setae.  Epicranium  with  two  long  and  two  short  dorso-epicranial 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


115 


Haptomeral  process  on  epiphyarnx  entire  or  notched.  Left  and  right  chaetoparia 
with  many  rows  of  stout  setae.  Lateral  face  of  mandible  with  7  to  8  setae;  scrobis 
with  1  to  2  setae. 

Thoracic  spiracle  .06  to  .62  mm.  long  and  .40  to  .42  mm.  wide.  Abdominal 
spiracles  of  1st  segment  .60  to  .63  mm.  long  and  .40  to  .42  mm.  wide  and  of  last 
segment  .35  to  .37  mm.  long  and  .27  to  .30  mm.  wide. 

Dorsum  of  abdominal  segment  7  with  an  anterior  row  of  four  long  and  six 
to  eight  short,  rather  stout  setae,  posteriorly  with  a  row  of  sparse,  long,  slender 
setae."  Raster  with  a  teges  of  38  to  40  hamate  setae,  scattered  on  the  posterior 
two  thirds  of  the  tenth  venter. 


Heteronychus  fossor  Reiche.  Third-stage  larva. 

(Figs.  6,  8,  10  and  11) 

Material  studied:  One  third-stage  larva  and  a  cast  skin  of  one  third- 
stage  larva  reared  to  the  adult  stage,  No.  ON  210  (a)  dated  March,  1965, 
collected  at  Onitsha  by  M.  L.  Jerath.  The  reared  adult  was  identified  by 
Commonwealth  Institute  of  Entomology. 

Description:  Maximum  width  of  head  capsule  of  third-stage  larva  3.87  mm. 
Cranium  light  yellowish  brown,  and  with  few  pits.  Frons,  on  each  side,  with  two  long 
anterior  frontal  setae,  one  long  exterior  frontal  seta,  one  short  and  two  long 
setae  in  each  anterior  angle  and  one  long  and  three  short  posterior  frontal 
setae.  Epicranium  with  two  long  and  two  short  dorso-epicranial  setae. 

Haptomeral  process  on  epipharynx  entire,  not  notched.  Right  chaetoparia  with 
many  rows  of  setae;  left  chaetoparia  with  only  one  row  of  stout  setae  near  the 
tormae.  Lateral  face  of  mandible  with  four  setae;  scrobis  with  one  to  two  setae. 

Thoracic  spiracles  .45  to  .47  mm.  long  and  0.30  to  .35  mm.  wide.  Spiracles 
of  first  abdominal  segments  .35  to  .37  mm.  long  and  .27  to  .30  mm.  wide  and  that 
of  last  abdominal  segment  .20  to  .23  mm.  long  and  .16  to  .18  mm.  wide. 

Dorsum  of  abdominal  segment  7  with  an  anterior  row  of  four  long,  slender  setae 
and  14  to  18  short,  rather  stout  setae,  posteriorly  with  a  row  of  sparse,  long, 
slender  setae.  Raster  with  a  teges  of  about  30  short,  slightly  curved  setae,  scattered 
on  the  posterior  one-third  of  the  tenth  venter. 


Literature  Cited 

Britton,  E.  B. 

1959.  Heteronychus  oryzae  sp.  n.  (Coleoptera:  Scarabaeidae)  a  pest  of  Rice  in 
Sierra  Leone.  Ann.  Mag.  Nat.  Hist.  (2)13:169-170,  5  figs. 

Jepson,  W.  F. 

1956.  The  biology  and  control  of  the  sugar-cane  chafer  beetles  in  Tanganyika. 
Bull.  Ent.  Res.  47(2)  :377-397,  6  figs. 

Jerath,  M.  L.  and  K.  L.  Unny 

1963.  Description  of  the  larva  of  Heteroligus  meles  Billb.  (Coleoptera:  Scara¬ 
baeidae).  Res.  Bull.  Punjab  Univ.  (n.s.)  14  (3-4)  :263-271. 

Le  Pelley,  R.  H.,  and  W.  H.  Goddard 

1952.  On  the  control  by  insecticides  of  Heteronychus  consimilis  Kolbe 
(Dynastidae),  a  serious  pest  of  wheat  in  Kenya.  Bull.  Ent.  Res. 
43(2)  :403-406. 

Oberholzer,  J.  J. 

1959.  A  morphological  study  of  some  South  African  Lamellicorn  larvae. 
I,  II.  Descriptions  of  the  third  instar  larvae.  Comparative  morphology. 
South  African  Jour.  Agric.  Sci.  2(1)  :4 1-74,  23  pis.,  75-88. 

1963.  Description  of  the  larva  of  Temnorhynchus  coronatus  F.  (Dynastidae: 
Col.).  South  African  Jour.  Agric.  Sci.  6(l):85-90. 


116 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


RlTCHER,  P.  O. 

1944.  Dynastinae  of  North  America  with  descriptions  of  the  Iravae  and  keys 
to  genera  and  species  (Coleoptera:  Scarabaeidae).  Kentucky  Agric.  Ext> 
Sta.  Bull.  467:1-56,  illus. 

Valle  y  March,  R.  G.  del 

1954.  Escaravelho  preto  do  milho  ( Heteronychus  licas  Klug).  Gazeta  do 
Agricultor  6(62)  :  194-195,  illus. 


11  12 


Figures  1-13.  Larvae  of  Heteronychus  sp. 


H.  licas.  1 — Head  capsule.  2— Last  antennal  segment.  3 — Left  mandible  dorsal 

view.  4— Left  mandible  lateral  view.  5 — Right  mandible  dorsal  view.  7 Maxilla 

ventral  view.  9— 7th  abdominal  segment.  12— Raster.  13— Abdominal  spiracle. 

H.  fossor.  6 — Left  mandible  lateral  view.  8 — Epipharynx.  10 — 7th  Abdominal 
segment.  1 1 — Last  three  abdominal  segments,  side  view. 


Symhoh  Used.  A  =  Antenna;  AA  =  Anterior  frontal  angle;  AC  =  Ada- 
a  C  i  T-  Acanthoparm;  ACR  =  Acroparia;  AFS  =  Anterior  frontal  seta;  ASL  = 
Anal  slit;  BR  —  Brustia;  C  =  Campus;  CAR  =  Cardo;  CO  =  Corypha*  CPA  = 
Chaetoparia,  CR  =  Crepis;  DES  =  Dorsodepicranial  setae;  DIP  =  Dorsal  impressed 
line;  DMS  =  Dorsomolar;  DX  =  Dexiotorma;  E  =  Epicranium,  EFS  =  Exterior 
frontal  setae;  ES=  Epicranial  suture;  EZ  =  Epizygum;  F  =  Frons;  FS  =  Frontal 
suture;  G  —  Galae;  GP  =  Gymnoparia;  HL  =  Haptolachus;  LA  =  Lacinia- 
l £L  =  Lfwer  anDa*  1]P i  LT  =  Laeotorma;  MA  =  Mala;  MO  =  Molar  area,: 
p&^_PDClyP,eUS;  PE  ~  ,Pedlum;  PFS  —  Posterior  frontal  setae;  PRSC  =  Prescutum; 
PSC  —  Postc*yPeusi  PTT  =  Pternotorma;  =  Scissorial  teeth;  SA  =  Scissorial 

tee'th-  In?e  C9nf;  S?u  =  ScuteHum;  SCU  =  Scutum;  SD  =  Stridulatory 

teeth,  SN  —  Scissorial  notch;  SPA  =  Spiracular  area;  SPA  =  Spiracle;  SS  = 

Sensory  sensi  la;  ST  Stipes;  STA  =  Stridulating  area;  T  =  Teges;  UN  =  Uncus; 
VP  =  Ventral  process;  Z  =  Zygum.  ’ 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


117 


TAXONOMIC  NOTES  ON  FOUR  SPECIES  OF 
LEXIPHANES  (COLEOPTERA:  CHR Y SOMELID AE ) 

FROM  MIDDLE  AMERICA1 

By  Edward  U.  Balsbaugh,  Jr.2 

For  his  revision  of  the  Lexiphanes  north  of  Mexico,  Balsbaugh 
(1966)  borrowed  “types”  from  several  European  museums  for  pur¬ 
poses  of  identification.  Some  of  the  specimens  which  he  received  were 
the  Middle  American  species  L.  guatemalensis  (Jacoby),  L.  sculptilis 
(Jacoby),  L.  scaphidioides  (Suffrian),  and  L.  anaglypticus  (Suffrian). 
This  paper  redescribes  these  species  and  designates  lectotypes  for  the 
two  Jacoby  species.  These  descriptions  of  the  Jacoby  species  are  based 
only  upon  their  respective  lectotypes.  No  lectotypes  are  fixed  for  either 
of  the  two  Suffrian  species  for  the  reasons  given  in  the  discussion  under 
these  species. 

Acknowledgments:  For  the  loan  of  this  material  the  author  is  in¬ 
debted  to  J.  Balfour-Browne,  British  Museum  (Natural  History);  Fritz 
Hieke,  Humboldt  Universitat,  Berlin;  and  J.  O.  Hiising,  Martin  Luther 
Universitat,  Halle-Wittenberg,  Deutsche  Demokratische  Republik. 
Appreciation  is  also  expressed  to  Francisco  Pacheco  M.,  Centro  de  In- 
vestigaciones  Agricultural  del  Norte,  Cuidad  Obregon,  Sonora,  Mexico, 
for  the  loan  and  exchange  of  Mexican  specimens.  Research  for  this 
paper  was  conducted  while  the  author  was  in  the  employ  of  the  Penn¬ 
sylvania  Department  of  Agriculture,  Harrisburg,  Pennsylvania. 


Lexiphanes  guatemalensis  (Jacoby) 

Monachus  guatemalensis  Jacoby,  1880:38. 

Lexiphanes  guatemalensis  (Jacoby).  Blackwelder,  1946:  643  (check¬ 
list). 

Lectotype,  here  designated:  Female,  “Zapote,  Guatemale”;  British 
Museum  (Nat.  Hist.). 

Description.  Head  black  with  blue  reflections;  frons  flat,  finely  alutaceous  with  a 
few  punctures.  Eyes  emarginate  around  antennal  bases.  Labrum  fulvous.  Antennae 
with  basal  2  segments  fulvous,  segments  3  and  4  black  and  with  a  few  short  setae 
(segments  5  through  11  of  right  antenna  and  3  through  11  of  left  antenna  missing). 
Pronotum  bluish-black  with  distinct  fine  punctures  evenly  distributed  over  entire 
surface;  disc  evenly  convex.  Prosternum  bluish-black,  alutaceous,  length  two-thirds 
of  width. 

Elytra  bluish-black  with  orange-red  fascia;  fascia  emarginate  posteriorly  around 
humeri,  covering  epipleura,  and  converging  medially  but  not  completely  to  suture. 
Curvature  evenly  convex  except  raised  dorsally  along  elevated  scutellum.  Discal 
striae  indistinct;  strial  punctures  distinct  but  becoming  effaced  posteriorly.  Surface 
finely  alutaceous.  Marginal  striae,  along  with  epipleura,  strongly  curved  ventrally. 


1  Approved  by  the  Director  of  the  South  Dakota  Agricultural  Experiment  Station 
as  Journal  Series  No.  716. 

2  Entomology-Zoology  Department,  South  Dakota  State  University,  Brookings, 
South  Dakota,  57006. 


118 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


Scutellum  nearly  equilaterally  triangular,  base  slightly  shorter  than  sides;  posterior 
apex  elevated  above  level  of  base;  surface  smooth.  Pygidium  bluish-black,  alutace- 
ous.  Abdominal  intercoxal  process  setose.  Fifth  abdominal  segment  of  female  with 
glabrous  fovea  medially.  A  smaller  setose  fovea  on  each  side  of  more  shining 
central  one.  Legs  bluish-black  with  following  parts  missing  from  lectotype:  left 
protibia  and  tarsus,  right  protarsus,  mesotarsal  segments  2  through  5  of  both  legs, 
and  right  hind  leg  including  coxa. 

Measurements.  The  following  measurements  were  taken  from  the  lectotype  (a 
female):  body  length,  3.75  mm.;  body  width,  2.50  mm.;body  thickness,  2.10  mm.; 
pronotal  length,  1.25  mm.;  pronotal  width,  2.25  mm.;  elytral  length,  2.50  mm.; 
epipleural  length,  1.25  mm. 

Discussion:  The  author  examined  3  specimens  of  this  species  (1 
female  and  2  males),  all  from  the  Jacoby  collection,  British  Museum 
(Natural  History).  Jacoby  (1880)  based  his  original  description  pri¬ 
marily  on  the  female  and  only  casually  mentioned  the  males.  Perhaps 
as  an  oversight,  he  failed  to  include  the  female  when  listing  the  type 
localities.  Nevertheless,  I  am  designating  this  female  as  lectotype  be¬ 
cause  it  carries  the  tag  “Type  Sp.  figured”;  it  compares  closely  with 
the  specimen  figured  by  Jacoby;  and  it  was  the  first  specimen  in  the 
series  of  syntypes.  Further,  it  is  the  only  female  in  the  group.  I  there¬ 
fore  consider  that  the  lectotype  is  the  specimen  figured  by  Jacoby 
(1880,  pi.  III.,  fig.  1)  and  the  chief  subject  for  the  original  description. 

Variation  was  observed  between  the  three  syntypes.  One  (Cor¬ 
dova,  Mexico)  has  much  wider  elytral  fasciae.  The  ground  color  of 
this  specimen  is  more  light  purple  rather  than  the  deep  bluish-black 
of  the  other  beetles. 


Lexiphanes  sculptilis  (Jacoby) 

Monachus  sculptilis  Jacoby,  1880:41. 

Lexiphanes  sculptilis  (Jacoby).  Blackwelder,  1946:  644  (checklist). 

Lectotype,  here  designated:  Male,  “Guanajuato,  Mexico,  Salle  Coll.”; 
British  Museum  (Nat.  Hist.). 

Description.  Head  black;  frons  flat,  alutaceous  and  with  a  few  punctures.  Eyes 
emarginate  at  antennal  bases.  Labrum  black  with  fulvous  distal  margin.  Antennae 
with  basal  two  segments  slightly  fulvous;  segments  3  and  4  becoming  darker; 
segments  5  through  11  black,  setose,  and  broader  than  basal  4.  Pronotum  black, 
alutaceous,  with  large  basal  median  punctures  diminishing  laterally  in  number  and 
size,  and  with  some  very  fine  punctures  on  disc  in  front  of  basal  median  punctures; 
disc  evenly  convex.  Prosternum  brownish-black,  alutaceous;  lateral  margins  rug- 
ulose;  subquadrate. 

Elytra  bluish-black,  evenly  convex  except  raised  dorsally  along  elevated  scutel¬ 
lum.  Deeply  striate-punctate,  marginal  and  submarginal  striae  especially  well  im¬ 
pressed;  punctures  large,  becoming  finer  posteriorly;  surface  alutaceous.  Scutellum 
narrowly  triangular,  pointed;  apex  elevated  somewhat  above  level  of  base;  sur¬ 
face  very  finely  alutaceous.  Pygidium  black,  roughly  alutaceous,  with  broad  close 
punctures.  Venter  black,  alutaceous.  Abdominal  intercoxal  process  with  long,  close 
setae.  Fifth  abdominal  segment  of  male  non-foveate  and  with  a  few  setae.  Legs 
black,  alutaceous.  Tarsal  claws  appendiculate. 

Measurements.  The  following  measurements  were  taken  from  the  lectotype  (a 
male):  body  length,  2.62  mm.;  body  width,  1.70  mm.;  body  thickness,  1.50  mm.; 
pronotal  length,  1.00  mm.;  pronotal  width,  1.50  mm.;  elytral  length,  1.62  mm.; 
epipleural  length,  1.00  mm. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


119 


Discussion:  The  lectotype  can  further  be  recognized  by  the  follow¬ 
ing  labels.  On  a  blue  tag:  “ Monachus  sculptilis  Jacoby,”  and  on  a 
white  tag:  “B.C.A.,  Col.  VI,  1.  Monachus  sculptilis  Jac.”  I  removed 
the  lectotype  from  its  mount,  which  was  formerly  glued  by  its  ventrum 
to  a  quadrangular  card,  and  remounted  it  on  its  right  side  to  a  triangular 
point  in  order  to  study  its  ventrum. 

The  second  specimen  of  Jacoby’s  series  was  labeled  as  follows* 
"‘Guanajuato”  “Mexico  Salle  Coll.”  “333”  “B.C.A.  Col.  VI,  1.  Monachus 
sculptilis  Jac.” 

Balsbaugh  (1966)  notes  a  close  relationship,  based  on  genitalic 
similarities,  between  L.  sculptilis  and  L.  mexicanus  (Jacoby). 

Lexiphanes  scaphidioides  (Suffrian) 

Monachus  scaphidioides  Suffrian,  1852:215. 

Lexiphanes  scaphidioides  (Suffrian).  Blackwelder,  1946:  644  (checklist). 

Syntypes:  "In  Yucatan  ( Mus .  Chevrolet)  und  Guatimala  (Mus. 
Deyrolle .)”  (Suffrian,  1852). 

FIRST  SYNTYPE:  Female,  type  number  “24372”;  “Guatimala”; 
Martin  Luther  Universitat,  Halle-Saale,  Deutsche  Demokratische  Re- 
publik. 

Description.  Head  black;  frons  flat,  finely  alutaceous.  Eyes  emarginate  around 
antennal  bases.  Distal  edge  of  labrum  fulvous.  Antenna  with  basal  5  segments 
fulvous,  segments  6  through  11  black  and  with  setae.  Pronotum  dull  black,  finely 
alutaceous;  disc  impunctate,  elevated  so  that  pronotum  is  not  evenly  convex  but 
slightly  lowered  mid-basally;  basal  margin  feebly  rugose  medially.  Prosternum 
subquadrate;  alutaceous  along  anterior  margin;  sparsely,  feebly  punctate. 

Elytra  evenly  convex;  black  with  yellowish-red  fascia;  fascial  width  two-thirds 
length  of  elytra;  the  fascia  emarginate  posteriorly  around  humeri,  covering  epi- 
pleura,  and  converging  medially  but  not  completely  to  suture.  Discal  striae  and 
punctures  obsolete,  only  feeble  “water-soaked’’  spots  in  place  of  strial  punctures 
visible  on  fascia.  Surface  very  finely  alutaceous.  Marginal  striae  impressed  and 
nearly  parallel  with  impressed  submarginal  striae  in  vicinity  of  epipleura.  Scutellum 
long  and  narrow  (base  three-fourths  wide  as  sides  long);  posterior  apex  elevated; 
surface  very  finely  alutaceous  (nearly  glabrous).  Pygidium  black,  alutaceous,  with 
sparse,  relatively  broad  but  shallow  punctures.  Ventrum  black,  alutaceous.  Fifth 
abdominal  segment  of  female  with  medial  fovea;  a  transverse  depression  at  pos¬ 
terior  end  of  segment;  long  setae  bordering  medial  fovea.  Legs  black.  Tarsal  claws 
appendiculate. 

Measurements.  The  following  measurements  were  taken  from  the  first  syntype 
(a  female):  body  length,  2.88  mm.;  body  width,  2.00  mm.;  body  thickness,  1.50 
mm.;  pronotal  length,  1.00  mm.;  pronotal  width,  1.75  mm.;  elytral  length,  1.88  mm.; 
epipleural  length,  1.12  mm. 

SECOND  SYNTYPE:  Male,  type  number  “19690”;  “Guatimala”; 
Martin  Luther  Universitat,  Halle-Saale,  Demokratische  Republik. 

Description.  Head  brownish-black  dorsally,  fulvous  from  antennal  bases  antero- 
ventrally  to  and  including  labrum.  Frons  convex  between  upper  lobes  of  deeply 
emarginate  eyes.  Surface  very  finely  alutaceous.  Labrum  long,  being  slightly  shorter 
than  broad.  Antennae  with  proximal  4  segments  and  basal  part  of  fifth  fulvous; 
segments  6  through  11  brownish-black  and  setose.  Pronotum  dull  black,  alutaceous, 
impunctate,  and  evenly  convex.  Prosternum  wider  than  long  (proportions  not  readily 
discernible  on  syntype  because  of  being  obscured  by  crossed  prolegs);  finely 
alutaceous. 


120 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


Elytra  brownish-black  with  yellowish  fascia;  width  of  fascia  slightly  less  than 
one-half  length  of  elytra,  emarginate  posteriorly  around  humeri,  covering  epipleura, 
and  converging  medially  but  not  completely  to  suture;  evenly  convex.  Discal  striae 
obsolete,  punctures  very  shallow.  Surface  finely  alutaceous.  Marginal  striae  im¬ 
pressed  and  nearly  parallel  with  impressed  submarginal  striae  in  vicinity  of  epipleura. 
Scutellum  with  base  two-thirds  wide  as  sides  long;  base  arched  anteriorly;  posterior 
apex  elevated;  surface  very  finely  alutaceous.  Pygidium  brownish-black,  alutaceous, 
with  relatively  broad  but  shallow  punctures,  each  bearing  a  single  seta.  Fifth  ab¬ 
dominal  segment  of  male  without  fovea  but  setose  medially.  Legs  brownish-black 
but  with  basal  portions  of  pro-  and  mesofemora  fulvous.  Tarsal  claws  appendiculate. 

Measurements.  The  following  measurements  were  taken  from  the  second  syntype 
(a  male):  body  length,  2.38  mm.;  body  width,  1.50  mm.;  body  thickness,  not  ac¬ 
curately  discernible  due  to  multilation  of  the  specimen  by  the  insect  pin; 
pronotal  length,  0.88  mm.;  pronotal  width,  1.33  mm.;  elytral  length,  1.50  mm.; 
epipleural  length,  0.63  mm. 

Discussion:  In  spite  of  Suffrian’s  accreditation  of  Chevrolat  as  author, 
Suffrian  is  the  currently  acknowledged  author  of  L.  scaphidioides,  as 
he  is  the  first  to  have  described  the  species  (Suffrian,  1852).  Lexiphanes 
scaphidioides  of  Chevrolat  is  presently  believed  to  be  a  nomen  nudum. 

Although  Suffrian  (1852)  listed  both  Guatemala  and  Yucatan  as  type 
localities,  only  the  two  Guatemalan  specimens  were  seen  by  this  author. 
These  carried  their  respective  “type”  numbers  and  were  accompanied 
by  a  separate  locality  label:  “Scaphidioides,  Cho.  M.,  Guatimala.”  This 
label  was  purported  by  Dr.  J.  O.  Hiising  of  Martin  Luther  Universitat 
(personal  communication)  to  be  original  with  Suffrian.  The  two  L. 
scaphidioides  redescribed  here  are  believed  to  be  those  Guatemalan  ex¬ 
amples  in  the  original  description  (Suffrian,  1852).  No  specimens  from 
Yucatan — those  supposedly  in  the  Chevrolat  collection — were  examined. 

It  is  difficult  or  impossible  to  specificially  associate  Suffrian’s  descrip¬ 
tion  of  this  species  with  one  or  the  other  of  the  two  specimens  studied 
since  Suffrian  compiled  his  description  of  the  species  from  several  ex¬ 
amples.  After  having  carefully  examined  the  Guatemalan  specimens,  this 
author  believes  that  these  beetles  represent  two  distinct  species.  At  least 
one  of  these  specimens  should  be  described  and  named  as  a  new  species, 
but  this  more  properly  should  be  done  after  the  “Yucatan  ( Mus .  Chevro¬ 
lat)”  specimens  (Suffrian,  1852)  can  also  be  studied.  Then  the  lectotype 
designation  for  L.  scaphidioides  could  be  fixed  more  accurately  and  the 
specimen  determined  which  represents  the  new  species  of  the  Guatemalan 
syntypes. 

The  two  Guatemalan  syntypes  differ  from  one  another  as  follows:  The 
coloration  of  the  fascia  of  the  first  is  a  brighter  yellowish-red,  while  the 
ground  color  of  this  specimen  is  a  darker  black.  The  overall  size  of  the 
two  beetles  varies  greatly,  even  considering  the  differences  in  their  sex. 
Proportions  are  different.  The  uniqueness  of  the  pronotal  conformation 
of  each  is  quite  noticeable.  That  of  the  first  syntype  recurves  posteriorly 
behind  the  disc,  while  the  pronotum  of  the  second  is  more  uniformly 
convex.  The  scutellum  of  the  second  syntype  appears  proportionately 
shorter  than  this  sclerite  of  the  first.  The  pronotal  surface  texture  is  more 
coarsely  alutaceous  in  the  second  specimen  than  that  of  the  first.  The 
author  believes  these  differences  are  too  great  to  be  either  sexual  or  infra¬ 
specific  variations. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


121 


Both  syntypes  of  L.  scaphidioides  differ  from  L.  guatemcdensis  in  having 
an  impunctate  pronotum  and  a  black,  rather  than  bluish-black,  ground 
color.  They  further  differ  from  this  latter  species  in  lacking  a  decided 
curve  in  the  marginal  and  submarginal  striae  near  the  epipleura.  Both 
specimens  of  L.  scaphidioides  can  be  distinguished  from  L.  mexicanus 
(Jacoby)  by  their  elytral  fascia  which  partially  surround  the  humeral 
umbones  in  an  emarginate  manner.  The  fasciae  in  L.  mexicanus  do  not 
surround  these  prominences.  Further,  the  pronotum  of  L.  mexicanus 
usually  has  a  few  medial  basal  punctures,  a  feature  lacking  in  L.  scaph¬ 
idioides. 

All  specimens  of  similarly  marked  beetles  from  Arizona  that  this  author 
has  seen  proved  to  be  L.  mexicanus.  Lexiphanes  scaphidioides  is  known 
to  him  only  by  the  above  two  examples  which  are  from  Guatemala.  He 
therefore  believes  that  Fall  (1934)  misidentified  Arizonan  beetles  of  L. 
mexicanus  as  L.  scaphidioides.  Thus  L.  scaphidioides  could  reasonably 
be  deleted  from  the  North  American  catalogue  of  beetles  (Blackwelder, 
1939). 


Lexiphanes  anaglypticus  (Suffrian) 

Monachus  anaglypticus  Suffrian,  1852:214. 

Lexiphanes  anaglypticus  (Suffrian).  Blackwelder,  1946:  643  (checklist). 

Holotype:  “Von  Chalapa.  ( Mus .  Berol .)”  (Suffrian,  1852). 

Description.  Head  dark  brown,  alutaceous;  epicranium  evenly  rounded  with 
surface  of  eyes;  frons  slightly  convex.  Eyes  emarginate  around  antennal  bases. 
Clypeus  brown,  with  setae.  Labrum  glossy,  light  brown,  with  a  few  setae,  three- 
fourths  as  long  as  wide.  Antennae  with  basal  segment  fulvous;  segments  2  through 
5  darker;  segments  6  through  1 1  dark  brown,  alutaceous,  broader,  and  setose, 
(segments  7  through  11  missing  from  right  antenna).  Pronotum  brownish,  posterior 
part  lighter,  becoming  more  reddish  laterally;  surface  finely  alutaceous;  base  with 
an  impressed,  posteriorly  arching,  medial  line.  Prosternum  brown,  alutaceus,  punc¬ 
tate  at  posterior  corners  and  along  posterior  margins;  length  two-thirds  of  width. 

Elytra  dark  brown,  finely  alutaceous,  punctate-striate,  striae  shallow  and  com¬ 
pletely  effaced  over  apical  half;  marginal  and  submarginal  striae  deeply  impressed  for 
entire  length;  marginal  interstrial  spaces  decidedly  convex.  Scutellum  long  and 
narrow,  sides  twice  as  long  as  base,  very  finely  alutaceous.  Pygidium  dark  brown, 
alutaceous,  with  broad,  shallow  punctures;  impressed  and  glabrous  at  posterior 
corners.  Ventrum  dark  brown,  alutaceous.  Prosternal  episternum  yellowish-orange, 
with  recessed  area  for  reception  of  profemora.  Abdominal  intercoxal  process  broad, 
devoid  of  setae.  Fifth  abdominal  segment  with  glabrous  fovea  medially,  a  few  short 
setae  laterad  of  fovea,  the  fovea  broader  posteriorly.  The  fifth  segment  lighter  brown 
posteriorly.  Legs  dark  brown;  tibiae  of  forelegs  and  all  tarsi  lighter.  Left  proleg 
missing. 

Measurements.  The  following  measurements  were  taken  from  the  study  specimen 
(a  female):  body  length,  2.40  mm.;  body  width,  1.75  mm.;  body  thickness,  1.40  mm.; 
pronotal  length,  0.80  mm.;  pronotal  width,  1.50  mm.;  elytral  length,  1.60  mm. 

Discussion:  The  specimen  described  above  carries  the  “type”  number 
“23568”  and  is  deposited  in  the  Institut  fur  Spezielle  Zoologie  und  Zoo- 
logischen  Museum,  Humboldt-Universitat,  Berlin.  Because  of  a  discrep¬ 
ancy  in  type  locality  indications,  some  doubt  exists  as  to  the  authenticity 
of  this  specimen  as  holotype.  The  type  locality  given  with  the  original 
description  (Suffrian,  1852)  is  listed  here  under  the  nomenclatural 


122 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


synonomy.  The  following  is  from  the  tag  accompanying  the  presumed 
holotype  from  Humboldt-Universitat:  “anaglypticus  Suff.  Jalappa  (sic) 
Depp.”  These  differences  in  spelling  may,  however,  result  only  from  a 
lapsus  calami  in  the  published  citation.  In  checking  various  atlases  the 
locality  “Chalapa”  could  not  be  found,  whereas  Jalapa  is  listed  for 
Mexico,  Guatemala,  and  Nicaragua.  The  holotype  is  likely  from  Mexico. 


Literature  Cited 


Balsbaugh,  Edward  U.,  Jr. 

1966.  Genus  Lexiphanes  of  America  North  of  Mexico  (Coleoptera:  Chrysome- 
hdae).  Proc.  United  States  Nat.  Mus.  117:  655-680. 

Blackwelder,  Richard  Eliot 

1939.  Fourth  supplement  1933-1938  (inclusive)  to  the  Leng  catalogue  of  the 
Coleoptera  of  America,  north  of  Mexico.  Mount  Vernon,  New  York 
146  pp. 

1946.  Checklist  of  the  coleopterous  insects  of  Mexico,  Central  America,  the 
West  Indies,  and  South  America,  part  4.  United  States  Nat.  Mus.  Bull 
185:  iv  +  551-763. 

Fall,  Henry  Clinton 

1934.  A  new  name  and  other  miscellaneous  notes  (Coleoptera).  Pan-Pacific 
Ent.  10:  171-174. 


Jacoby,  Martin 

1880.  Biologia  Centrali-Americana,  Insecta,  Coleoptera  6(1):  1-72. 
Suffrian,  Eduard 

1852.  Zur  Kenntniss  der  nordamerikanischen  Cryptocephalen.  Linn.  Ent.  6: 
198-3 18. 


LITERATURE  NOTICE 


THE  FENNOSCANDIAN,  DANISH  AND  BRITISH  SPECIES  OF  THE  GENUS 
THOMSON  (C°L  ANOBIIDAE).  By  C.  Johnson.  Opusc.  Ent.  31(1-2): 
8  i -92,  30  figs.  1966. — A  key  to  9  species,  with  figures  of  antennae,  pronota,  male 
genitalia,  and  a  few  other  structures,  and  with  notes  on  each  species  are  presented. 
Previous  identification  has  been  difficult  because  of  variation;  male  genitalia  have 
helped  alleviate  this  situation.  Many  species  of  Ernobius  are  of  economic  importance. 

A  CLASSIFICATION  OF  THE  GENERA  AND  HIGHER  TAXA  OF  THE 
MELOID  SUBFAMILY  ELECTICINAE  (COLEOPTERA).  By  R.  B.  Selander. 
Canad.  Ent.  98(5):  449-481,  75  figs.  1966. — 2  tribes,  seven  subtribes  (3  new),  and 
10  genera  (3  new)  are  recognized,  keyed,  and  diagnosed.  Also,  4  new  species  are 
presented.  Members  are  found  in  the  Neotropical,  Ethiopian,  and  Oriental  Regions. 

STAPHYLININI  UND  QUEDIINI  (COL.  STAPH YLINIDAE)  VON  NEW¬ 
FOUNDLAND,  SUDOST-LABRADOR  UND  NOVA  SCOTIA  (59.  BEITRAG  ZUR 
KENNTNIS  DER  STAPH YLINIDEN ) .  By  A.  Smetana.  Acta  Ent.  Fennica  20: 
3-60,  77  figs.,  1  table.  1965. — Contains  mostly  distribution  records  for  59  species 
and  subspecies,  of  which  6  are  new.  Also,  some  new  synonymies  and  a  key  to  the 
nearctic  species  of  the  subgenus  Quedius. 


REVISAO  DOS  LANGURIINAE  NEOTROPICAIS  (COLEOPTERA,  LAN- 
GURIIDAE).  By  U.  R.  Martins  and  F.  S.  Pereira.  Arq.  Zool.  (Brazil)  13:  139-300, 
97  figs.,  4  maps.  1965. — Keys,  descriptions,  distributions,  and  illustrations  of  15 
geneia  (2  new)  and  82  species  (16  new)  are  given.  The  keys  are  also  translated 
into  English  in  the  summary.  This  group  is  now  well  treated  in  the  Western  Hem¬ 
isphere;  in  1948  Vaurie  did  the  Languriidae  of  North  America. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


123 


A  NEW  SPECIES  OF  MARTINIUS  FROM  CUBA 
(COLEOPTERA:  LIMNICHIDAE) 

By  T.  J.  Spilman1 


The  Thaumastodinae  of  the  Limnichidae,  according  to  my  recent  study 
(1959,  Coleop.  Bull.  13(4) :  1 1 1-122,  30  figs.),  included  three  genera  and 
four  species  from  India,  Philippines,  the  Malay  peninsula,  and  Panama. 
The  only  member  from  the  Western  Hemisphere  was  Martinius  tellipontis 
Spilman,  from  Panama.  Now  another  western  member  must  be  added; 
an  undescribed  species  of  this  genus  was  discovered  by  Fernando  de 
Zayas  in  Cuba.  Serior  de  Zayas  generously  sent  the  specimens  for  study. 

A  new  observation  on  the  morphology  of  all  members  of  the  Thaumas¬ 
todinae  should  be  presented  before  describing  the  new  species.  The 
orientation  of  the  metatarsal  claws  of  the  Thaumastodinae  is  odd.  The 
apices  of  the  claws  are  directed  toward  the  morphologically  anterior  surface 
of  the  leg,  not  toward  the  morphologically  ventral  surface,  as  is  usual 
in  most  insects  and  as  is  the  condition  in  the  protarsal  and  mesotarsal 
claws  of  the  Thaumastodinae.  The  reason  for  this  odd  orientation  is  in 
the  attitude  in  which  the  whole  metathoracic  leg  is  positioned  and  moved. 
The  parts  of  the  leg  do  not  rotate  on  the  leg  axis;  the  morphologically 
anterior  surface  always  faces  ventrally  and  the  morphologically  ventral 
surface  faces  posteriorly  or  toward  the  body’s  midline,  depending  on  the 
flexure  of  the  leg  at  any  one  time.  Certainly  the  plate-like,  immobile 
metacoaxe  contribute  to  the  lack  of  rotation,  and  the  coxa-trochanter  and 
trochanter-femur  joints  do  not  appear  capable  of  rotation.  Now,  if  the 
claws  of  these  beetles  were  directed  toward  the  leg’s  morphologically 
ventral  surface,  they  would  not  be  effective  in  gripping  the  surface  of  the 
ground  below  the  beetle.  Because  the  anterior  surface  of  the  metathoracic 
leg  does  face  the  ground,  the  claws  are  directed  in  what  seems  to  be  an 
abnormal  position,  toward  the  morphologically  anterior  surface.  The 
claws  thus  come  into  contact  with  the  ground. 

Perhaps  the  metatarsal  claws  are  not  the  only  parts  of  the  leg  with 
an  odd  orientation;  the  metatarsal  segments  themselves  may  have  their 
morphologically  anterior  surfaces  directed  ventrally.  The  orientation  of 
these  segments  is  not  so  easily  determinable  because  the  segments  are 
cylindrical  and  do  not  have  good  reference  points  of  direction  as  do 
claws.  Yet,  one  characteristic  of  these  segments  might  give  a  slight  clue 
that  the  segments  have  the  same  orientation  as  do  the  claws:  the  long, 
coarse  setae  at  the  apices  of  segments  1-3  are  on  what  appears  to  be  the 
morphologically  anterior  surface,  not  on  the  morphologically  ventral 
surface,  as  one  might  expect  and  as  is  the  case  in  the  protarsal  and 
mesotarsal  segments.  However,  not  much  weight  can  be  attached  to  the 
position  of  these  setae,  because  setae  on  beetle  legs  often  occur  or  develop 
coarseness  without  any  definite  regard  to  morphological  orientation.  The 


1  Entomology  Research  Division,  Agr.  Res.  Serv.,  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture, 
Washington,  D.  C. 


124 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


direction  of  the  setae  on  the  metatarsus  in  the  Thaumastodinae,  that 
is,  orientation  toward  the  surface  of  the  ground  below  the  beetle,  has  the 
same  effect  as  the  position  of  the  claws;  it  provides  a  good  grip  on  the 
ground. 

In  the  two  preceding  paragraphs  I  have  used  the  terms  ‘morphologically 
ventral  surface’  and  ‘morphologically  anterior  surface’  as  if  each  leg 
always  had  its  longitudinal  axis  held  perpendicular  to  the  longitudinal  axis 
of  the  body  and  as  if  the  leg  were  always  completely  extended,  with  the 
femur-tibia  flexure  always  ventral.  Thus,  difficulties  of  determining  correct 
orientation  of  legs  and  of  describing  surfaces  of  those  legs  are  avoided.  It 
is  a  simple  arrangement  used  by  many  entomologists;  unfortunately  it  has 
not  been  commonly  adopted  by  coleopterists.  Such  orientation  would 
avoid  the  impossible  terms  ‘inside’  and  ‘outside’  for  leg  surfaces. 

Martinius  ripisaltator  Spilman,  NEW  SPECIES 

Description.  Similar  to  Martinius  tellipontis,  but  differing  as  follows:  In  dorsal 
view,  lateral  border  of  pronotum  and  lateral  border  of  elytra  in  posterior  half 
slightly  moie  convex  (fig.  1);  pronotal  and  elytral  transverse  convexity  stronger* 
dorsoventral  angulation  of  lateral  borders  of  pronotum  and  elytra  not  so  acute* 
not  tending  toward  being  explanate;  long,  coarse  setae  on  tibiae  and  tarsi  shorter 
and  coarser,  especially  noticeable  on  metatibiae;  generally  smaller,  length  2.35-2.60 
mm.,  width  1.15-1.35  mm.;  female  with  slightly  longer  setae  on  protibia  and  pro¬ 
tarsus,  sexual  dimorphism  thus  not  so  distinct. 

Specimens  examined.  Holotype,  male,  Cuba,  Habana  Province,  sea¬ 
shore  near  Rio  Santana,  Marianao,  June  1951,  F.  de  Zayas.  Allotype, 
female,  same  data  as  holotype.  Paratypes,  32  males,  41  females,  same 
data  as  holotype.  All  specimens  in  United  States  National  Museum;  tvpe 
number  68186. 


Figures  1-2.  Martinius  spp.,  body  outline  in  dorsal  view.  ripisaltator. 
2 — tellipontis. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


125 


The  label  name  Rio  Santana  is  probably  a  contraction  of  Rio  Santa 
Ana.  Senor  de  Zayas  sent  the  following  note  with  the  specimens.  “This 
species  lives  on  the  moist  sand  among  the  mangroves  and  ‘dog-teeth’ 
limestone  in  the  intertidal  zone.  The  locality  is  very  near  the  mouth  of 
the  river,  about  10  miles  west  of  Habana.  The  beetles  are  very  active 
and  jump  like  fleas  and  fly,  so  collecting  them  is  very  difficult.  To  collect 
them  I  made  several  fast  runs  along  the  intertidal  zone,  holding  the  net 
about  an  inch  above  the  ground.” 

The  new  species  described  above  can  be  differentiated  from  the  one 
previously  described  in  the  following  manner. 

Body  outline  in  dorsal  view  as  in  fig.  1;  metatibia  with  longest  seta,  excluding 
setae  on  apex,  not  longer  than  second  metatarsal  segment;  from  Cuba 

- RIPISALTATOR  Spilman 

Body  outline  in  dorsal  view  as  in  fig.  2;  metatibia  with  longest  seta,  excluding 
setae  on  apex,  longer  than  second  metatarsal  segment;  from  Panama 
- TELLIPONTIS  Spilman 


CYRTOBAGOUS  HUSTACHE,  A  GENUS  OF  WEEVILS 
NEW  TO  THE  UNITED  STATES  FAUNA 
(COLEOPTERA:  CURCULIONIDAE:  BAGOINI) 

By  D.  G.  Kissinger12 


The  following  specimens  of  Cyrtobagous  singularis  Hustache  (1929, 
p.  228),  a  monobasic  genus,  were  found  at  the  ultraviolet  collecting  light 
at  the  Archbold  Biological  Station,  near  Lake  Placid,  Highlands  Co., 
Florida:  one,  7  June,  1962;  four,  28  May,  1964.  The  species  was  origin¬ 
ally  described  from  Curumba,  Matto  Grosso,  Brazil.  I  have  an  additional 
specimen  from  Parque  Sooretama,  Linhares,  Espirito  Santo,  Brazil.  One 
specimen  in  the  United  States  National  Museum  collection  was  intercepted 
on  an  airplane  from  Mexico.  Material  in  the  British  Museum  (N.  H.), 
determined  by  R.  T.  Thompson,  was  seen  from  Obidos,  Brazil,  April, 
1963,  F.  D.  Bennett,  on  Salvinia,  and  Ogle  Estate,  British  Guiana, 
October,  12,  1961,  F.  D.  Bennett,  on  Salvinia  auriculata.  The  present  deter- 


1  Atlantic  Union  College,  South  Lancaster,  Mass. 

2  Aided  by  grant  GB  1442  from  the  National  Science  Foundation;  I  am  indebted 
to  Richard  Archbold  for  his  hospitality  during  my  visits  to  the  Archbold  Biological 
Station;  special  thanks  are  due  to  R.  T.  Thompson  for  the  loan  of  specimens  from 
the  British  Museum  (N.H.). 


126 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


mination  is  based  upon  a  study  of  the  original  description  and  material 
from  the  British  Museum  (N.  H.)  determined  by  R  T.  Thompson.  The 
specimens  seen  agree  with  the  original  description  but  have  a  six  instead 
of  a  seven  segmented  funiculus.  It  is  assumed  that  the  description  is  in 
error  on  this  point  because  of  the  unusual  antennae. 

In  using  the  subfamily  key  presented  by  Kissinger  (1964)  some  diffi¬ 
culty  may  be  experienced  in  placing  the  genus.  At  couplet  18  the  genus 
is  correctly  described  by  the  first  statement  except  it  has  the  first  segment 
of  the  antennal  club  nearly  glabrous  and  lacks  both  a  seven  segmented 
funiculus  and  an  apical  channel  on  the  prosternum.  The  alternate  state¬ 
ment  of  couplet  18  refers  to  Rhynchophorinae,  with  which  Cyrtobagous 
could  not  be  confused  due  to  its  lack  of  a  tibial  uncus.  At  couplet  36  a 
decision  is  difficult  because  the  unusual  claws  of  Cyrtobagous  appear 
connate  but  are  free  when  examined  under  a  compound  microscope.  If  the 
connate  claw  choice  is  followed  the  six  segmented  funiculus  will  immedi¬ 
ately  distinguish  Cyrtobagous  from  the  choices  of  five  and  seven  segmented 
funiculi  offered  at  couplet  37.  If  the  free  claw  alternative  at  couplet  36 
is  followed  the  genus  will  come  out  at  couplet  52  to  Hyperinae  due  to  its 
transverse  eyes.  Cyrtobagous  lacks  conspicuous  setosity  on  the  rostrum; 
the  elytra  and  prothorax  are  clothed  with  well  separated,  round,  green 
(or  blue)  submetallic  scales;  the  funiculus  has  six  segments;  the  antennal 
club  has  the  first  segment  elongate  and  largely  glabrous;  and  the  ventral 
parts  of  the  thorax,  femur,  tibia  and  tarsus  are  clothed  with  dense,  grey 
water  repellent  vestiture.  Hyperinae  have  the  rostrum  more  or  less  uni¬ 
formly  setose;  prothorax  and  elytra  with  dense,  narrow,  elongate  scales 
or  setae;  funiculus  with  seven  segments;  antennal  club  uniformly  pubes¬ 
cent;  and  lack  water  repellent  vestiture. 

In  the  key  to  the  genera  of  Erirhininae  of  the  United  States  presented 
by  Kissinger  (1964)  the  genus  will  run  to  couplet  9  because  the  hind  tibia 
is  not  uncinate  and  will  key  to  Stenopelmus  Schoenherr  due  to  the  short 
prosternum  and  nearly  centrally  inserted  front  coxae.  Cyrtobagous  in 
addition  to  features  mentioned  above  has  the  rostrum  slightly  longer  than 
the  dorsal  margin  of  the  prothorax  in  side  view,  scape  not  reaching  eye, 
scrobe  not  extending  below  eye,  and  has  the  tarsal  claws  nearly  straight 
in  side  view.  Stenopelmus  has  a  seven  segmented  funiculus,  dense  vesti¬ 
ture  on  prothorax  and  elytra,  rostrum  about  one-half  as  long  as  prothorax 
in  side  view,  scape  extending  past  middle  of  eye  on  ventral  margin  of  eye, 
scrobe  extends  beneath  eye,  and  tarsal  claws  are  distinctly  curved. 

The  original  description  of  C.  singularis  gives  a  range  of  length  of  2.5 
to  2.8  mm.;  available  material  ranges  from  1.88  to  2.64  mm.  long  by  1.00 
to  1.50  mm.  wide 


Literature  Cited 


Hustache,  a. 

1929.  Nouveaux  curculionides  de  l’Amerique  du  Sud.  Rev.  Soc.  Ent.  Argentina 
2:  227-232. 

Kissinger,  D.  G. 

1964.  Curculionidae  of  America  north  of  Mexico:  a  key  to  the  genera.  143  pp. 
Taxonomic  Publications,  South  Lancaster,  Mass. 


1966 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


127 


Figures  1-4 — Cyrtobagous  singulars  Hustache,  from  Archbold  Biological  Station, 
Lake  Placid,  Florida,  apparently  a  female.  1 — Lateral  view,  scale  equals  0.299  mm. 
2 — Dorsal  view,  scale  equals  0.296  mm.  3 — Dorsal  view  of  head  and  rostrum,  scale 
equals  0.232  mm.  4 — Lateral  view  of  tarsus  3,  scale  equals  0.072  mm. 


128 


THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 


Volume  20 


WERE  THEY  HYDROPHILIDS?  (COLEOPTERA). 

In  1909  (Ent.  News  20(8):  364)  Warren  Knaus  published  a  note  about  two 
hunters  who  shot  into  a  passing  swarm  of  large  insects  with  guns,  and  brought  down 
what  proved  to  be  Hydrophilus  triangularis  Say.  The  beetles  were  flying  eastward  just 
after  6  P.M.  at  the  western  outskirts  of  McPherson,  Kansas. 

This  record  immediately  came  to  mind  upon  reading  the  entry  for  the  night  of 
June  12-13,  1849,  in  Captain  Howard  Stansbury’s  “Exploration  and  survey  of  the 
valley  of  the  Great  Salt  Lake  of  Utah,  including  a  reconnoissance  of  a  new  route 
through  the  Rocky  Mountains.”  There  are  two  editions  of  this  work,  1852  and  1853; 
bibliographically  they  are  separate  items. 

According  to  Stansbury,  then,  p.  25.  [Tuesday,  June  12,  1849]  “After  travelling 
twenty-six  miles,  we  encamped  on  the  level  bank  of  Walnut  Creek — a  tributary  of 
the  Little  Blue,  with  a  tolerable  supply  of  grass  and  water.  ...” 

Wednesday,  June  13. — About  two  o’clock  in  the  morning,  the  camp  was  sud¬ 
denly  aroused  by  the  bursting  upon  it  of  a  most  furious  storm.  The  wind  blew  a 
hurricane,  the  rain  fell  in  torrents,  while  the  thunder  and  lightning  were  terrible 
and  incessant.  Fortunately  the  camp  had  been  pitched  in  a  sheltered  spot,  or  it  must 
have  been  entirely  blown  away  by  the  tempest:  as  it  was,  the  tents  were  prostrated 
by  the  wind,  and  preserved  with  much  difficulty.  Our  men  were  exposed  to  all  its 
fury  for  several  hours.  At  length,  however,  the  sky  partially  cleared,  but  the  lowering 
enemy  seemed  still  to  linger,  as  if  meditating  another  attack.  The  morning  proved 
exceedingly  hot  and  close;  the  barometer  continued  to  fall.  Our  poor  mules  having 
been  picketed  within  the  lines  all  night,  and  consequently  exposed  to  the  storm,  seemed 
dejected,  tired,  and  hollow;  altogether  the  camp  seemed  weary  and  dispirited.  The 
weather  looked  so  very  doubtful  that  we  did  not  move  until  half-past  two  o’clock;  the 
men  being  until  then  engaged  in  drying  their  bedding,  which  had  been  thoroughly 
soaked  by  the  rain.  An  immense  number  of  black  beetles  and  other  insects  swarmed 
around  the  camp  last  evening.  Attracted  by  the  light,  they  annoyed  us  beyond  measure, 
and  could  be  heard  all  night,  pattering  against  the  tent  like  large  drops  of  rain  in 
a  heavy  shower.” 

According  to  the  daily  and  accumulated  mileages  given  in  Appendix  A,  Outward 
Journey  from  Fort  Leavenworth,  their  camp  on  the  night  of  June  12-13  must  have 
been  in  present  day  Jefferson  County,  Nebraska,  close  to  Fairbury.  In  the  Appendix, 
Walnut  Creek  is  equated  with  Emigrants’  [j/c/]  Creek.  On  June  13  they  travelled 
only  five  miles  and  camped  on  the  right  bank  of  the  Little  Sandy,  crossing  the  Big 
Sandy  at  noon  the  next  day. 

Hydrophilus  triangularis  flies  in  the  dark  and  readily  comes  to  light — witness 
B  latch  ley’s  comment  (1910.  Coleoptera  of  Indiana,  p.  255),  “Sometimes  attracted  by 
thousands  to  electric  light  in  Indianapolis  and  the  larger  cities.”  It  seems  a  reasonable 
infeience  that  Captain  Stansbury’s  notes  refer  to  this  species.  Indeed,  his  locality 
cannot  be  very  far  from  that  of  Thomas  Say’s  examples  used  for  the  original  descrip¬ 
tion  of  H.  triangularis.  Say  accompanied  Major  Long  on  his  1819-1820  expedition 
to  the  Rocky  Mountains,  going  via  the  Platte  River  and  returning  by  the  Arkansas;  of 
his  type  series  he  wrote.  It  is  rather  rare  in  Pennsylvania  but  I  obtained  several 
specimens  near  the  Rocky  Mountains.” — Hugh  B.  Leech,  California  Academy  of 
Sciences,  San  Francisco,  California. 


NOTICE 

A  new  scientific  book  series,  Series  Entomologica,  will  contain  all  kinds  of  en¬ 
tomological  publications.  Works  and  catalogues  of  systematic  entomology  will  be 
represented  as  well  as  studies  on  anatomy,  physiology,  bionomy,  biology,  ecology 
and  epidemiology  of  insects,  and  on  the  geographical  distribution  of  insects  or  the 
history  of  entomology.  It  will  also  provide  for  monographs  on  single  species  of  in¬ 
sects.  Special  attention  will  be  given  to  the  treatment  of  entomophagous  insects. 
Volume  1  is  a  revision  of  a  subfamily  of  Braconidae  and  volume  2  is  a  catalogue 
°  ^cnus  of  Zygaenidae.  Dr.  E.  Schimitschik  of  Mtinden,  Germany,  is  the  editor, 

Dr.  W.  Junk,  Publishers,  13  van  Stolkweg,  The  Hague,  The  Netherlands,  is  the 
publisher. 


-BACK  ISSUES- 

The  Col 

eopterists'  Bulletin 

Per 

Single 

Volume 

Issue 

Vol. 

3, 

1949,  6  issues 

(Nos.  1  &  2  o.p.J  $5.00 

$1.00 

Vol. 

4. 

1950,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol. 

5. 

1951,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol. 

6, 

1952,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol. 

7, 

1953,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol. 

8, 

1954,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol. 

9, 

1955,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol. 

10, 

1956,  6  issues 

5.00 

1.00 

Vol. 

11. 

1957,  2  issues 

5.00 

3.00 

Vol. 

12, 

1958,  1  issue 

5.00 

5.00 

Vol. 

13, 

1959,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol. 

14, 

1960,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol. 

is, 

1961,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol. 

16, 

1962,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol. 

17, 

1963,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol. 

18, 

1964,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

Vol. 

19, 

1965,  4  issues 

5.00 

1.25 

THE  COLEOPTERISTS'  BULLETIN 

620  Michigan  Avenue, 

N.E.  Washington,  D. 

C.  20017 

Now  in  its  38th  year — 

Anthropological  Quarterly 

(formerly  Primitive  Man) 

Issued  January,  April,  July  and  October 

Some  Recent  Contents: 

Grasshoppers  as  Food  in  Buhaya  . P.  O.  Mors 

A  Pygmy  Group  Newly  Discovered  in  New  Guinea.  Martin  Gusinde 

Eskimo  Reindeer  Herding . Robert  T.  Anderson 

Rock  Paintings  of  South  Africa  . Abbe  Henri  Breuil 

The  Assinboin  Horse  Medicine  Cult . John  C.  Ewers 

Treatment  of  Disease  in  the  New  Guinea  Highlands 

Louis  J.  Luzbetak 

(Articles  on  Physical  and  Cultural  Anthropology) 

Subscription  Price  $5.00  a  year  Single  Issues  $1.00 

Anthropological  Quarterly 

620  Michigan  Ave.,  N.E.  Washington,  D.  C.  20017 


Separate  Sections  available  from 


THE  BEETLES  OF  THE  UNITED  STATES* 

by 

Dr.  Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr. 

An  Introduction  to  the  Study  of  Beetles  $1.00 

Section  1 — Cupedidae,  Rhysodidae,  Cicindelidae,  Carabidae  by 
George  E.  Ball,  Amphizoidae,  Haliplidae,  Dytiscidae, 
Noteridae,  Gyrinidae  $3.00 

Section  2 — Sphaeriidae,  Hydroscaphidae,  Hydrophilidae,  Limne- 
biidae,  Georyssidae,  Staphylinidae,  Pselaphidae,  Sil- 
phidae,  Leptodiridae,  Leptinidae,  Leiodidae,  Ptiliidae, 
Limulodidae,  Scydmaenidae,  Scaphidiidae,  Brathinidae  $3.00 

Section  3 — Histeridae,  Sphaeritidae,  Lucanidae,  Passalidae,  Scara- 
baeidae,  Clambidae,  Dascillidae,  Helodidae,  Eucine- 
tidae,  Byrrhidae,  Psephenidae,  Ptilodactylidae,  Chelo- 
nariidae,  Heteroceridae,  Limnichidae,  Dryopidae, 
Elmidae,  Buprestidae,  Rhipiceridae,  Cebrionidae, 
Elateridae,  Throscidae,  Cerophytidae,  Perothopidae, 
Eucnemidae  $3.00 

Section  4 — Not  Available 

Section  5 — Tenebrionidae,  Lagriidae,  Alleculidae,  Monommidae, 
Othniidae,  Salpingidae,  Pyrochroidae,  Melandryidae, 
Cephaloidae,  Oedemeridae,  Pedilidae,  Anthicidae, 
Euglenidae,  Nitidulidae,  Rhizophagidae,  Sphindidae, 
Cucujidae,  Cryptophagidae,  Biphyllidae,  Byturidae, 
Languriidae,  Endomychidae,  Coccinellidae,  Erotylidae, 
Phalacridae,  Cisidae,  Orthoperidae,  Lathridiidae,  Coly- 
diidae,  Mycetophagidae  $3.00 

Section  6 — Cerambycidae,  Chrysomelidae,  Bruchidae,  Anthribi- 

dae,  Brentidae,  Curculionidae,  Platypodidae,  Scolytidae  $3.00 

INDEX  $2.00 

*  Complete  book  is  out  of  print. 

Send  your  order  today!! 

The  Catholic  University  of  America  Press 
620  Michigan  Avenue,  N.E* 

Washington,  D*  C.  20017 


UNIVERSITY  OF  ILLINOIS-URBANA 

595. 705COLB  C001 

C 0 LEO PT ER  1ST S ’  BULLETINS  WASHINGTON,  D 

UN,VERSrrY  OF  ILLINOIS-URBANA 


3  0112  122671677